Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
NB 1 ON-ST. PARKING 10-19-92
NEW BUSINESS N0. 1 10-19-92 AGENDA1()_1q_9'?_ DATE: OCTOBER 19 1992 Inter -Com �� S TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION CITIZEN REQUEST FOR MODIFICATIONS TO ON -STREET PARKING SUBJECT: RESTRICTIONS ALONG SIXTH STREET BETWEEN EL CAMINO REAL AND "C" STREET RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Tustin City Council, at their meeting of October 19, 1992, authorize the following: 1. Deny the request to remove the two-hour parking restriction signs along Sixth Street between El Camino Real and "C" Street. 2. Maintain the existing red curb markings in the area of the E1 Camino Real and Sixth Street intersection. BACKGROUND: Mr. Don LeJuene, a resident of Tustin, has requested the Public Works Department consider implementing the following changes to existing parking restrictions in the E1 Camino Real/Sixth Street area: 1. The removal of the two-hour parking zone along Sixth Street between El Camino Real and "C" Street. 2. The reduction of red zone on Sixth Street, at the southwest corner and on the northeast corner of the El Camino Real and Sixth Street intersection. DISCUSSION: The two-hour parking restrictions, along Sixth Street between E1 Camino Real and "C" Street, were authorized by City Council action in June, 1984. Attached are copies of two staff reports and their respective City Council minutes from the May 7, 1984 and June 18, 1984 City Council meetings regarding the parking issue in this area of the City. The existing red curb markings in the area of the El Camino Real/Sixth Street intersection were also authorized by the City Council in conjunction with the installation of the traffic signal at the same intersection. A copy of the staff report and accompanying City Council minutes, from the March 15, 1982 City Council meeting, recommending the installation of red curb markings in the area around the subject intersection, is attached. Citizen Request October 19, 1992 Page 2 The subject red curb markings were recommended to improve intersection visibility and to provide adequate turning radii for vehicular traffic. CONCLUSIONS: Upon review, the Engineering Division concludes the following: 1. The two-hour parking restrictions along Sixth Street, between E1 Camino Real and "C" Street, should remain since there has not been substantial changes in the area to warrant a change in parking restrictions. This would preclude a reoccurrence of concerns that were previously expressed by area residents. 2. The E1 Camino Real/Sixth Street intersection has not been physically modified since the original signal installation in 1984. The same concerns that led to the installation of the existing red curb markings in this area in 1984 are still concerns today. Therefore, it is recommended that the current red curb zones in this area be maintained. Robert S. Ledendecker Director of Public Works/City Engineer RSL:da:PARKING Attachments E'21 2 D WG_ IE: JUNE 13., 1984 TO: WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER BUSINESS 10. 1 6-18-84 Inter —Com APPROVED STAFF= RECOV%'.= N DATION FROM: BOB LEDENDECKER., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: PARKING COMPLAINTS AT 200 BLOCK WEST SIXTH STREET AND 500 BLOCK SOUTH C STREET It RECOMMENDATION: That the Tustin City Council, at their meeting of June 18, 1984, authorize the following: 1. Two hour parking tow away zone, 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.., Monday through Saturday on Sixth St. between "B" Street and 150 + feet .easterly -of E1 Camino Real. 2. Install handicapped parking zones on westerly side of "C" Street and the northerly side of "B" Street. 3. Install red zones at the intersections of Sixth and "C" Street, and Sixth and "B" Street. BACKGROUND: On May 7., 1984, staff presented a report (copy attached) to City Council outlining parking complaints at the 200 block of West Sixth Street and the 500 block of South "C" Street and some suggested actions to help resolve some of the complaints. This report also suggested that a neighborhood meeting be held to discuss the concerns and hopefully resolve some of the indifferences. A neighborhood meeting was held Thursday evening, May 24th, with nine residents/businesspersons in attendance and.a representative of the Tustin News. DISCUSSION: As a result of this neighborhood meeting, several concerns and/or ideas surfaced with respect to the parking complaints as follows: 1. Restricted parking on "C" Street northerly of Sixth Street would pose a hardship both on the residents and anyone else utilizing the street for parking. The dwelling units along the 500 block south of "C" Street have garages, but these garages are either used for storage or the property owner charges additional rent for the use of the garage. IE 13, 1984 ;E 2 2. Individuals delivering groceries, meals, etc. to the senior citizens within the complex at the'500 block of south "C" Street can not find a place to park within a reasonable distance of the point of delivery. 3. The Tustin garage utilizes the on -street parking for employee parking, customer car parking, and parking of inoperable vehicles. 4. A concern of the residents was the industrial development on the Southwesterly corner of Sixth Street and "B" Street was utilizing the underground parking for storage in lieu. of vehicle parking. In March, 1983, the Community Development Department reviewed a similar . complaint and found no storage of materials. Additionally, on June 1, 1984, the underground parking area was investigated with the finding of no material storage and the following vehicle/parking space information: a. Total parking spaces available is 32. b.. Eight vehicles parked in underground parking area. A copy of the March, 1983 Community Development Department staff report is attached -for information. 5. Mr. Chornomund suggested that the City might lease the vacant parcel at 450 E1 Camino Real to his business for use of parking on an interim basis. This suggestion has been reviewed and found not to be feasible. The Redevelopment Agency purchased this parcel for future commercial development and any use for parking would be -very short term with respect to the improvements that.would be required to have it function as a parking lot. 6. It was also suggested that the top level of the parking structure on "C" Street could be utilized for employee parking of the Tustin garage. However, this parking structure should not be utilized for the long term storage of inoperable vehicles. 7. The Chornomund's have requested the resi den -s to n6ti fy them immediately if any of their employees infringe upon the residents private properties, disturbing the peace., repairing vehicles in the street right-of-way-, etc.., and they will attempt to reduce these occurences.- As a first phase reaction to these community complaints, staff suggests the following actions: .1. Modify existing parking zones to read "Two Hour Parking Tow Away Zone, 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M.., Monday through Saturday��on Sixth Street both easterly and westerly of El Camino Real. ^` ONE 13_3, 1984 4G 3 2. Add additional two hour parking zones (as described in No. 1 above) on both sides of Sixth Street between 8��Street and 150 + feet easterly of E1 Camino Real in areas currently unmarked. 3. Install handicapped parking zones on Sixth Street and "C" Street as shown in blue on the attached map. 4. Install additional red curb on all approaches of the "C" Street/Sixth It Street and "B" Street/Sixth Street intersections as shown on the attached map. In addition to these measures., the Police Department is seeking to modify the Tustin Municipal Code to include a section of continuous violations. These modifications would allow violators to be cited on a continual basis, i.e., once every two hours within a two hour parking limit zone. Bob Ledendecker Director of Public Works/City Engineer — BL:jr Attachment Z z X61 "moi ��:G � •. -' • .:_,_. _ � G o 76 70 fl. coo 7 6 coo owo AVE .,. tq F4w � ixm t. R. ` ' .1 Iz PASADENA • c.. �� 7*0 1 C4: <v77w �%�Z v 7/57 o 00 0 0 0 0 7W - MYRTLE Z z X61 "moi ��:G � •. -' • .:_,_. _ � G o 76 70 fl. coo 7 6 coo owo AVE .,. PACIFIC - ST: -+ y Az ss Geo N v PACIFIC S7 s3 3+o m 535 cn = 550 - 436 _ ��f �•� 4 4M 4ZO ' o f, �icsW c9m CAM Im Ogg y� l- 700 - ixm t. R. ` ' .1 Iz PACIFIC - ST: -+ y Az ss Geo N v PACIFIC S7 s3 3+o m 535 cn = 550 - 436 _ ��f �•� 4 4M 4ZO ' o f, �icsW c9m CAM Im Ogg y� l- 700 - = PEPPERTREE .. ARK - 2 ty P • _ ST w v► (n n' O ' o o po8 0 0� oic EL CAMINO REAL Nj \fid � v,� uR � !� •oo • v J'• 4 p O ►� p v M PROSPECT AVE .. Ooo o� •. t. R. ` ' .1 Iz = PEPPERTREE .. ARK - 2 ty P • _ ST w v► (n n' O ' o o po8 0 0� oic EL CAMINO REAL Nj \fid � v,� uR � !� •oo • v J'• 4 p O ►� p v M PROSPECT AVE .. Ooo o� •. ;zf MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JUNE 18, 1984 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kennedy at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Edgar, and the Invocation was given by Councilman Hoesterey. II. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Donald J. Saltarelli Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Approximately 50 in the audience III. PROCLAMATION - 1983 WOMAN OF THE YEAR Mayor Kennedy read and presented a proclamation honoring and recog- nizing Frances Wilcox Logan as the 1983 Woman of the Year, nominated by the Tustin Historical Society. Mrs. Logan expressed her thanks to the Council and the Historical Society, and she introduced family members. z Members of the Tustin Historical Society were invited to stand and 4 received recognition as well. IV. RECESS - CLOSED SESSION; RECONVENED At 7:09 p.m. it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterto recess to a Closed Session or iscussion o legalmatters. ar & 5-0. The City Council meeting was reconvened at 7:32 p.m. with all members present. V. PUBLIC INPUT 1. DRAINAGE PROBLEM - 1422 LANCE DRIVE Retired Major R. A. Campbell, 1422 Lance Drive, complained that stagnant water settles in front of his home as a result of sewage backed up on Andrews. He stated he has complained to the Water and Engineering Departments in the past to no avail, and he will circu- late a petition among area homeowners and contact the County Health Department if the problem is not resolved. Mayor Kennedy assured Mr. Campbell the Director of Public Works -would be in contact with him the next day. 91 2. PROPOSAL - BURGLARY PROTECTION SYSTEM Philip Costanzo, 14422 Grassmere Lane, proposed and demonstrated a low-cost, high technology burglary protection system which he has developed. Mayor Kennedy thanked Mr. Costanzo and requested he direct a letter to Council for evaluation, response and review by the Chief of Police. 82 CITY COUNCIL MINU'i. Page 2, 6-18-84 VI. PUBLIC HEARING 1. APPEAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 84-8 - GEORGETOWN MANOR APARTMENT EXPAN- SION AT 13181-13195 GWYNETH DRIVE The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated June 13, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department. The Community Development Director summarized a letter dated June 14, 1984, from Alice Anderson, 1362 Olwyn Drive, in opposition to the project. The Community Development Director narrated slides of the proposed apartment expansion which were viewed by Council. Mayor Kennedy opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. James Beauchamp, project applicant, spoke in favor of Use Permit No. 84-8 and responded to Council questions. The following persons spoke in opposition to Use Permit No. 84-8: Howard Gorman, 1421 Mauna Loa Edward Chang, 1271 Mauna Loa Charles A. Tamulevich, 13191 Gwyneth Drive, #C, read a letter from Michael/Diana Marchese, 1282 Olwyn Drive, in favor of U.P. #84-8. Kent Sorey, 1321 Mauna Loa, spoke in opposition to Use Permit No. 84-8. The following persons spoke in favor of Use Permit No. 84-8: Tim Hawthorne, 13183 Gwyneth Drive, #A Hugh Daschbach, 13189 Gwyneth Drive, #C, read a letter dated June 7, 1984, signed by three neighbors and himself. William Jones, read a letter from Terry White dated April 12, 1984. Bernard Maye-O'Brien, 13181 Gwyneth Drive, #A The following spoke in opposition to Use Permit No. 84-8: Marsha Sorey, 1321 Mauna Loa James McKahan, 1392 Olwyn Drive Ted Ondracek, 1342 Olwyn Drive, read letter dated June 11, 1984, from Mrs. Ondracek in opposition to Use Permit No. 84-8. Deon Kelly, 1312 Olwyn Drive Chris Gorman, 1421 Mauna Loa Maureen McKahan, 1392 Olwyn Drive The public hearing was closed at 8:37 p.m. by Mayor Kennedy. Council discussion followed, with consensus that the matter be con- tinued to review project modifications, i.e., lowering structure height to one-story, decreasing density through elimination of units, and providing fire access to the complex. It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar. to continue con- sideration ot Use Permit No. 64-6 to July 16, 1984. Motion carried 5-0. 81 VII. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. Councilman Edgar made a correction to the June 4, 1984, Minutes, page 4, item 4, to read as follows: "4. ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING SCHEDULED - BUDGET DISCUSSIONS Council concurred to schedule an adjourned regular meeting on Tuesday, June 5, 1984, at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall Conference Room to discuss the 1984-85 budget." CITI 'CIL MINUTES Page �-18-84 The motion carried 5-0 to approve the Consent Calendar with the noted correction to item No. 1. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 4, 1984 (As corrected) JUNE 59 1984 JUNE 6, 1984 2. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $109,399.24 APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $878,090.18 50 3. RESOLUTION NO. 84-44 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 12018 Adopted Resolution No. 84-44 as recommended by the Community Development Department. 99 4. RESOLUTION NO. 84-45 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, INFORMING THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE STATUS OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS Adopted Resolution No. 84-45 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 54 5. REQUEST FOR RESTRICTED PARKING DURING STREET SWEEPING OPERATIONS - WALNUT PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Authorized the installation of signing to restrict on -street parking during street sweeping hours, 6:00 A.M. to Noon on Monday, on all the streets within the Walnut Park Community development and that warnings be issued in lieu of citations for the first 30 days after sign installation as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 75 6. LOAN TO TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, SOUTH CENTRAL PROJECT AREA _ Authorized the Mayor to sign the subject Agreement loaning the South Central Redevelopment Project Area $125,000 at 145 interest as recommended by the Finance Director. 84-28 VIII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION None. IX. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION None. X. OLD BUSINESS 1. PARKING COMPLAINTS - 200 BLOCK WEST SIXTH STREET AND 500 BLOCK SOUTH -C' STREET As recommended in the inter-com report dated June 13, 1984, pre- pared by the Director of Public Works, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to authorize the following: 1) Two hour parking tow away zone, 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday on Sixth St. between "B" Street and 150 + feet easterly of El Camino Real; 2) Install handicapped parking zones on westerly side of "C" Street and the northerly side of "B" Street; and 3) Install red zones at the intersections of Sixth and "C" Street, and Sixth and "B" Street. In accordance with Councilman Edgar's suggestion, the Director of Public Works was requested to provide a status report six months from implementation of the authorized action. The motion carried 5-0. 75 Leonard Chronomud, 14401 Cloverbrook, owner of Tustin Garage at 560 E1 Camino Real, voiced objections to the two-hour parking tow -away zone on Sixth Street between "B" Street and 150 + feet easterly of El Camino Real. CITY COUNCIL MINUI. Page 4, 6-18-84 Chris Chornomud, 14401 Cloverbrook, spoke in concurrence with Leonard Chornomud's comments and requested that Tustin Garage be provided sufficient timely notice of any changes to be implemented in the parking conditions. AGENDA ORDER OTHER BUSINESS Councilman Greinke extended congratulations to Joyce Bailey, Edison Company representative, upon her election as President of the Tustin Chamber of Com- merce. XI. NEW BUSINESS 1. PUBLIC HEARING - 1984-85 BUDGET It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to conduct a public hearing on July 2, 1984, at 7:00 p.m., regarding the preliminary 1984-85 budget as recommended by the City Manager in his inter-com dated June 12, 1984. Carried 5-0. 29 2. ANNUAL TREE STUMP REMOVAL b GRINDING PROGRAM Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-com dated June 13, 1984, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoestere , to award the Annual Tree Stump Removal and Grinding Program to Edney Tree Service -for $7,175.00 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 86.1 AGENDA ORDER - WALK-ON ITEM CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE COMMUNICOM/UNITED CABLE Bob Guthrie, CommuniCom representative, made a chart presentation show- ing that the system will be completely installed by June 30, 1984, with the exception of three areas. Councilman Greinke reiterated his concerns regarding failure to obtain corporate guarantees from United Cable. He stated he would not support any extension until the City recovers $10,000 in legal fees from United Cable, to which the City Attorney responded it could be a condition of extension. Bob Towe, Vice President of United Cable, explained the confusion sur- rounding completion of system construction. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Greinke, that subject to payment of legal fees in the amount of $10,0001, plus staff time spent or the project, CommuniCom will be given a 30 -day extension for con- struction without the 5500/day penalty and a 90 -day extension for acquisition by United Cable. Councilman Hoesterey was agreeable on the condition that there be updates at 30 -day intervals on how matters are proceeding. Mr. Towe stressed the quality of the system's operation, and requested that acquisition of CommuniCom by United be kept a separate issue. He agreed the City should be reimbursed for additional legal expenses, but noted that staff time is covered by the franchise fee and that it should not be included in ongoing expenses. The City Manager recommended staff be directed to determine future expenses as "reasonable compensation." There was general consensus and further Council discussion. The motion carried 5-0. XI. NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 53 3. BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN FACILITY PROJECTS (FISCAL YEAR 1984-85) The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recom- mendation as contained in his inter-com dated June 11, 1984. CI JNCIL MINUTES Pay. ,` 6-18-84 Following Council/staff discussion, it was moved b Ed ar, seconded b Greinke, to authorize sidewalk construction on the northerly side of McFadden Avenue and 200 + feet easterly of Tustin Village Way and Pasadena Avenue at an estimated cost of $13,300.00, with costs over and above Tustin's allocation of $10,294.00 to be aug- mented from the General Fund. Carried 5-0. 86 4. PROPOSAL TO REPLACE CITY WISHING WELL ENTRANCE SIGNS The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in his inter-com dated June 13, 1984, on subject project. Council discussion followed regarding installation of signs for traffic entering Tustin from southerly points. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to: 1) Authorize staff to obtain competitive bids and expend a maximum of $5,000 from the Beautification Fund to replace three City entrance signs as recommended by the Director of Community Development; and 2) Direct staff to review a City-wide entryway sign plan, includ- ing relocation of existing signs, not necessarily tied to the wishing well design. The motion carried 5-0. 93 XII. REPORTS 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - JUNE 11, 1984 7 It was moved Dy Hoesterey, seconded tX Edgar, to ratify the entire Planning ommission Action Agenda of June 11, 1984. After a brief question -and -answer period, the motion carried 5-0. 80 2. COLUMBUS-TUSTIN WELL PROJECT STATUS REPORT Following a question -and -answer period, it was moved by Edgar, sec- onded by Saltarelli, to receive and file the inter-com report dated une , prepared by the Director of Public Works on subject item. Carried 5-0. 107 3. STATUS REPORT CONCERNING ZONING CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN As recommended in the inter-com dated June 13, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded b Ey dgar, to receive and file subject report. Motion car- ried - 6 4. REVIEW OF CITY'S ZONING b BUILDING CODE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to direct City staff and the City Attorney to prepare the necessary documents for a citation program to enforce Zoning and Building Code violations as recommended by the Community Development Department in the inter- com dated June 13, 1984. Following Council/staff discussion, the motion carried 5-0. 81 5. PARK b CIVIC CENTER BOND REDEMPTION OPTIONS The City Manager presented the staff report as contained in the inter -tom report dated June 13, 1984, prepared by the Finance Director, and responded to Council questions. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded b Saltarelli, to authorize the Finance Director to explore purchasing the bonds (with no increment limitations) and actively pursue same with available fund balances. Motion carried 5-0. 50 CITY COUNCIL MINUT Page 6, 6-18-84 XIII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. REQUEST FOR CONTINUED CLOSED SESSION The City Manager requested a continuance of the Closed Session for discussion of legal matters. 2. NATIONAL AWARDS FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING The City Manager noted with pride that the City has been awarded a Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting, and the Finance Director has been presented an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement, by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA). The City Council requested a press release to that effect be prepared, accompanied by a Council congratulatory letter to appropriate staff members. 50 3. SAW DIEGO CREEK SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN The City Manager responded to Councilman Edgar's inquiry on the San Diego Creek Sedimentation Control Program, stating that the City was not advised of same until most details had been worked out, and the City's position is contrary to that stated in County Supervisor Riley s letter. Staff has no intention of bringing the matter to Council until a response to concerns on the program is received. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION GUIDELINES There was discussion regarding expiration of Planning Commission terms, establishing guidelines for interested applicants, and establishing a logical appointment procedure. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize the Planning Commission to continue in its present form until such time as appointments/reappointments are made. The motion carried 5-0. 80 5. TUSTIN LEGISLATORS Councilman Greinke reported he was in Washington, D.C., a few weeks ago and met with, and was able to express thanks personally to, Congressman Dannemeyer on supporting Tustin on the Bullet Train issue, and to Congressman Badham on assisting in the realignment issue through the USMCAS(H), Tustin. 6. REVIEW OF POLITICAL CAMPAIGN SIGN REGULATIONS Councilman Greinke inquired on the status of Council's direction at its April 16, 1984, meeting to direct staff to review existing sign controls for possible revision to place political signs under same guidelines as those for realtors, etc. The Community Development Director responded that staff hopes to have a report at the July 2. 1984, meeting. 93 1. CONGRATULATIONS TO COUNCILMAN EDGAR Councilman Greinke congratulated Councilman Richard B. Edgar on his joint chairmanship of the 'range County Sanitation District. 8. TUSTIN WATER UTILITY ANNEXATION NO. 131 Councilman Saltarelli expressed thanks to staff and City Council for the excellent follow-up job done in the LAFCO matter regarding Tustin Water Utility Annexation No. 131. 24 9. TUSTIN MEADOWS DRAINAGE PROBLEM Councilman Saltarelli reported a problem in Tustin Meadows with the Bridgeport/Greenmeadow drain causing water backup, and it needs to be flushed out. 91 CI )NCIL MINUTES Pag, ,' 6-18-84 10. CLEANUP OF NORTHBOUND 55 FREEWAY Mayor Kennedy thanked the Director of Public Works for effecting the cleanup of the northbound Costa Mesa 55 freeway by CalTrans. XIV. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT - CLOSED SESSION; ADJOURNMENT At 10:22 p.m., it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency, thence to a Closed Session for discussion of legal matters; and thence adjourn to the next regular meeting on July 2, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. Carried 5-0. MAY I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JUNE 18, 1984 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Kennedy at 10:22 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. 2. ROLL CALL Agency Members Present: Ursula E. Kennedy, Chairperson Frank H. Greinke, Chairperson Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Donald J. Saltarelli Agency Members Absent: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Approximately 10 in the audience 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Ear, to approve the minutes of the June, 1964, meeting. The motion carried 5-0. 4. LOAN TO TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - SOUTH CENTRAL PROJECT AREA As recommended in the inter-com dated June 13, 1984, prepared by the Finance Director, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoestere , to �f authorize the Chairperson to sign subject agreement accepting the loan of $125,000.00 at 12% interest from the City's General Fund. After a brief question -and -answer period, the motion carried 5-0. 81 84-28 5. MISCELLANEOUS Mr. Grei nke reported there are some major cracks in the parking structure ramps which need to be sealed. He requested the Director of Public Works look into the matter. 6. ADJOURNMENT At 10:24 p.m., it was moved by Edgar, seconded b Kennedy, to adjourn to the next regular meeting on July Carried5-0. L� L CHAI �Ol�— /7 U ATE: MAY 2, 1984 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER NES•! SUSINE-SS . NO. 1 5-7-84 Inter -Com Aao N0VED STAFF IRECv BOB LEDENDECKER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER PARKING COMPLAINTS AT 200 BLOCK WEST SIXTH STREET AND 500 BLOCK SOUTH "C" STREET RECOMMENDATION: That the Tustin City Council consider holding a neighborhood meeting to discuss any proposed changes with respect to parking modifications that they desire to implement along Sixth Street, "C" Street, or E1 Camino Real. BACKGROUND: A letter has been received from Mr. and Mrs. Charles Anderson -regarding vehicle parking problems in the 200 block of West Sixth St. and 500 block of South 'C" ..—Street (copy attached). Accompanying this letter was a list of ten signatures of idividuals requesting additions to the existing parking limitations. The parcels ..here these individuals reside are shown in yellow on the attached map. DISCUSSION: The Police Department traffic section has reviewed the concerns outlined in the Anderson letter and have recommended, with concurrence of the Engineering Division, implementation of the following measures: Parking Zones 1. Modify existing parking zones to read "Two Hour Parking Tow Away Zone, 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M., Monday through Saturday" on "B" Street both easterly and westerly of E1 Camino Real and along E1 Camino Real between Main St. and Newport Avenue/I-5 Freeway. 2. Add additional two hour parking zones (as described in No. 1 above) on both sides of Sixth Street between "B" Street and Newport Avenue in areas currently unmarked. 3. Add additional two hour parking zones (as described in No. 1 above) on both sides of "C" Street between Sixth Street and the northerly cul-de-sac terminus in areas not covered by other recommended restrictions. _A. Add additional two hour parking zones (as described in No. 1 above) on both sides of "B" Street between Sixth Street and the southerly cul-de-sac terminus. ARKING COMPLAINTS AT 200 BLCOK WEST SIXTH STREET AND 500 BLOCK SOUTH "C" STREET MAY 2, 1984 PAGE 2 5. Install handicapped parking zones along Sixth Street adjacentto tae esterhownln ly portion of 570 "C" Street and adjacent to 540, 550-560 C blue on the attached map. Red Zones 1. Install additional red curb on all approaches of the "C" Street/Sixth Street and "B" Street/Sixth Street intersections as shown on the attached map to improve intersection vi sabi 1 i ty. In addition to these measures, the Police Department is seeking to modify the Tustin Municipal Code to include a section on continuous violations. These once modifications would allow violators to be cited on a cont every two hours within a. two hour parking 1 imi t zone. None of these additional measures have been discussed with the residents/business persons within the affected neighborhood. It is suggested that prior to any pproval by the City Council, that a meeting be scheduled to notify the neighborhood of said changes. ` Bob Ledendecker Director of Public Works/City Engineer - BL:jr cc: Sgt. Smith, T.P.O. April 24, 1984 TO: THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL FROM: Mr. and Mrs. Charles W. Anderson We want to call your attention to the vehicle parking problem which exists in the 200 block of West Sixth Street and the 500 block of South "C" Street due to the parking of automobiles belonging to the employees and patrons of the garage located on the corner of El Camino Real and West Sixth Street. We have contacted the City Council and Tustin Police many times and have asked for some kind of control over this indiscriminate parking of all types of vehicles, mostly in disrepair, and have received full cooperation within the limits of City control. We contend with unsightly broken-down, junky automobiles, ali sizes of trucks and motor homes lining our streets for days at a time; abusive language from the employees of the garage; men sleeping in these vehicles; litter left from the ..-.men working on the vehicles in the street or eating their lunches in the parkway. nis past Saturday morning, a very large limb was broken from our avocado tree by ine of the employees who was attempting to park a 2 to 2 1/2 ton enclosed box -type truck directly in front of our residence. This same truck had been parked across the street for 10 days and had been ticketed by the police. - Due to the above, we have conducted a survey of the residential and business personnel in the 200 block of West Sixth Street and the 500 block of South "C" Street and the consensus is that the most practical and advantageous thing to do is to ask that the above stated area (diagram attached) be posted for limited parking - i.e. two *(2) hour parking between six (6) a.m. and six (6) p.m. Monday through Saturday. This would greatly enhance the overall appearance of these streets, and thus the community, as well as better utilize the limited on -street parki ng ' for both business and residences. We also request one handicapped parking slot on the north side of West Sixth Street at the easterly boundary line of the Anderson property eastward to the existing driveway to serve the needs of the totally handicapped person residing at the address cf 570-M "C" Street. Attached you will find a list of signatures and addresses of those requesting limited parking posting. NAME : ADDRESS i i,�•r �►'''' / �� NAME: a•— , . NAMES � � ���,f% �_ �1,; -:...: `:• . G ADDREss: ADDRESS (T NAME: NAMES ADDRESS i ill ADDRESS 16 L4 NAME: J _ �• ADDRESS s : - ADDRESS _ . �./r- •X's':.:, �/ � `�„[ yY• •.iii. � / .s• Mc :ar;... NAME I' ADDRESSS ADMESS ...- .�fJ. 411/� .••- /o,"�� NAME •;:{�... _.,.: NAM: /� --� ADDRESS: ADDRESS! h C NAME:- HAMF+ ADDRESS: •-'�!::- ADDRESS s lk fir► . � � .. /,• ti PASADENA . - AVE � 4 W J • •D m 73 67/ t-% o` �• 7�� r� 720 - wizt►. "7-�` O O v 0 M -4MYRTLE ' = AVE � G IPA S.r. 4 404 G�� ¢ z s _ P �► s 600 v v► . GSI o 0 R O PACIFIC .: • ' ST: t PAC ! F ! C : _ ST sss s3 �o rn 535 ., JF r. -550cn R t 4 4 ;; • 4Zo urm� , EMAcam � -© A I- ow"M J • ] 11.1 PEPPERTREE u, PARK • ZZS g . -C ST `S26 5 a 158 w w o 'L 700 Sts *9I N V 540 4t • i5D /4S vt = 0 � � V1 y1 u+ 40 AVX m o Q SSo 70 % N _ un DFc 44-61 0 /O O o IOc EL CAMINO REAL Ln s rn 17-01 X" y `s o 0 0 0 PROSPECT AVE . _ MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA MAY 1, 1984 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kennedy at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Hoesterey, and the Invocation was given by Councilman Edgar. i II. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Pro Tem Richard E. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Donald J. Saltarelli Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Royleen A. White, Dir, of Admin. & Com. Srvcs. Isabelle McClements, Sr. Citizens Leader Approximately 125 in the audience III. PUBLIC INPUT 1. REGULATIONS FOR OFF -SALE LIQUOR OUTLETS Jack Miller, 17352 Parker Drive,, representing the "Parents Who Care" organization, read a letter dated May 4, 1984, addressed to the Council which recommended: 1) A moratorium on issuance of per- mits to alcoholic beverage outlets, except restaurant -type loca- tions, to allow the Planning Commission and City Council time to study the negative impact of such outlets; 2) That the criterion for distance between schools and off -sale outlets be set at 1,000 feet minimum, and 600 feet minimum for on -sale outlets; 3) That the sale of alcoholic beverages and motor vesicle fuel at the same business location be prohibited; and 4) That all off -sale outlets be subject to the CUP process. as required by most other Orange County cities. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to direct the Planning Commission to review how other Orange County cities are dealing with this matter, and report back with recommendations based on that review. Mr. Miller requested that Co.ncil also declare a moratorium on issuance of permits during the review period. In response to Councilman Hoesterey, the City Attorney stated that the Council could adopt a 90 -day moratorium on issuance of any permits; staff could come back to Council with an emergency ordinance of that type, with a condition that a study is to be placed into process with a report for a permanent solution to come back to Council; and the 90 -day moratorium could be extended at a later point. Following Council/staff discussion, the motion was amended b Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to direct staff to prepare an urgency ordinance declaring a 90 -day moratorium on issuance of permits for retail "off -sale" liquor outlets to allow the Planning Commission time to review other Orange County cities' regulations for same, and report back with recommendations based on that review. The amended motion carried 5-0. 81 CITY COUNCIL MINU1. Page 2, 5-7-84 2. IRVINE COMPANY'S PROPOSED AUTO CENTER AT BRYAN b BROWNING AVENUES The following persons spoke in opposition to subject project: Bob Clevenger, 1761 Andrews, voiced concerns about the proposed location of the project to schools, a church, and residential areas. Bruce Carter, no address given, felt the project should be termi- nated without going into public hearings or plan review. Councilman Edgar explained the Environmental Impact Report process and noted that Council is legally required to conduct public hear- ings to receive all evidence and public input. Hubert Clark, 1942 San Juan, stated that the purpose of area resi- dents attending this evening is to make Council aware of their opposition to the present location of the proposed project. Councilman Saltarelli provided additional information pertaining to development of the East Tustin area; he assured the audience that Council will not allow a commercial development 60 feet from exist- ing residential areas; and that whatever is done, there must be residential -type buffers to protect the existing residential areas. Councilman Saltarelli stated he felt the project should be located at the I-5 Freeway and Myford Road. Oscar Barnhardt, 13872 Karen Way, shared photos of Browning Avenue which was flooded during last year's rainstorms. Mayor Kennedy thanked residents in attendance and encouraged all to leave their name, address, and phone number with the City Clerk for mailing of information and public hearing notices. An informal question-and-answer/discussion period followed, and the City Manager once again explained the EIR process. 81 IV. PROCLAMATIONS 1. "FIRE SERVICE RECOGNITION DAY" - MAY 12, 1984 Mayor Kennedy read and presented a proclamation to Battalion Chief Greg Peterson, Orange County Fire Department, designating Saturday, May 12, 1984, as "Fire Service Recognition Day." Chief Peterson thanked the Council on behalf of Fire Chief Holms and the Orange County Fire Department. 84 2. "OLDER AMERICANS MONTH" - MAY, 1984 A proclamation designating the month of May, 1984, as "Older Ameri- cans Month" was read and presented by Mayor Kennedy to Isabelle McClements, Senior Citizens Leader. Mrs. McClements thanked the Council and introduced officers of various senior citizens' clubs. 84 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. AMENDMENTS TO 1979 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE - ORDINANCE NO. 909 The staff report and recommendation was presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated May 7, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department. A brief question -and -answer period followed. The public hearing was opened at 8:05 p.m. There being no speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed. It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordi- nance No. 9 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 909 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 909 be introduced as fol ows: CIT INCIL MINUTES Pag 15-7-84 ORDINANCE NO. 909 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PART 8, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 8103 OF THE TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING AMENDMENTS OF THE 1979 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (Re: Elevators, Escalators, Etc.) Motion carried 5-0. 30 2. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 84-1 - ORDINANCE NO. 911 The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated May 7, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department. Council discussion followed on restricting day care homes with swimming pools. The public hearing was opened at 8:10 p.m. There being no speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Edgar, seconded U Hoestere , that Ordinance No. 911 have--fi riding mit o only. Larri5-0. The City Clerk provided first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 911. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 911 be introduced and amended to exclude day care homes with swimming pools as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 911 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE ALLOWING LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES IN THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 84-1) Following Council/staff discussion, the motion carried 5-0. 109 t VI.' CONSENT CALENDAR t Item No. 7 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Edgar. It was moved by Sal tarelli, seconded b Greinke, to approve the remainder of the Lonsent Ualendar. Carried b -U. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 16, 1984, REGULAR MEETING APRIL 17, 1984, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING 2. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $107,040.90 APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF 51,304,863.24 50 3. RESOLUTION NO. 84-34 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING H.R. 4103 (Cable Television) Adopted Resolution No. 84-34 as requested by the City Council. 53 4. REJECTION OF CLAIM OF WILLIAM ALLEN REID; DATE OF LOSS: 3-8-84; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 3-29-84; CLAIM NO. 84-7 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 5. POLICE VEHICLE REPLACEMENT Authorized exception to Tustin bid procedures and authorized purchase of two Chevrolet Impalas to replace the older, high mileage units in our patrol fleet, at a cost of $22,484.72 as recommended by the Chief of Police. 87 6. RESOLUTION NO. 84-36 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 12138 (2681, 2685, 2691 Dow Avenue) Adopted Resolution No. 84-36 as recommended by the Community Development Department. 99 8. HOMEOWNER REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL - 13572 UTT DRIVE Authorized removal of subject trees under the provision of the current City Tree Removal Policy, Section II, as recommended by the Maintenance Superintendent. 86.1 CITY COUNCIL MINUI Page 4, 5-7-84 9. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS FOR TRACTS NO. 8590 AND NO. 8763 Authorized the following: 1) Execute the amended and restated Jamboree Road Improvement Agreement between the Irvine Company and the City of Tustin; and 2) Release of the following Sub- division Improvement Bonds: Tract No. 8590, #244109 - Faithful Performance in the amount of $318,750.00 and #244109 - Labor and Materials in the amount of $159,375.00 and Tract No. 8763, #2584139 - Faithful Performance in the amount of $498,700.00, and #2584139 - Labor and Materials in the amount of $249,350.00 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 45; 84-26 10. CITIZEN REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL - 14831 BRANBURY CIRCLE 99 Authorized removal of subject tree under provisions of Section II of the current City Tree Removal Policy as recommended by the Maintenance Superintendent. 86.1 11. DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS ITEMS Declared the 45 items listed in subject report as surplus items to the needs of the City as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 85 12. RESOLUTION NO. 84-37 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 84-2 (Walnut Street) Adopted Resolution No. 84-37 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 81 Consent Calendar Item No. 7 Senior Center Consultant Contract - Councilman Edgar expressed concern that a tentative date be fixed for commencement of project. If that date is not feasible, then a report should be made to Council fixing a future date, etc. Council discus- sion followed. It was then moved by Ed_gar, seconded by Hoestere , to approve the following with the condition that Council have a status report at the September 4, 1984, Council meeting: 7. SENIOR CENTER CONSULTANT CONTRACT Approved the Senior Center Consultant Contract with Recreation Systems, Inc., in the amount of 55,000 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement as recommended by the Recreation Superintendent. Motion carried. 45 84-27 VII. ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION 1. NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROCEDURE - ORDINANCE NO. 908 The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com .dated May 7, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department. Council/staff discussion followed regarding Councilman Greinke's concern over prohibiting parking of vehicles on residential lawns. Council concurred to direct staff to present a plan at the May 21, 1984, meeting or abatement/removal of inoperative vehicles and prohibition of parking vehicles on lawns. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Ed ar, that Ordinance No. 908 have first reading by title only. Larried 5-0. Following first reading of Ordinance No. 908 by title only by the City Clerk, it was moved by Ed ar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 908 be introduced as ollows: ORDINANCE NO. 908 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 5, SECTIONS 5500 THROUGH 5510, TO ARTICLE 5 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE, ESTABLISHING NUISANCE ABATE- MENT REGULATIONS Motion carried 5-0. 81 CI' ONCIL MINUTES Pag, 5-7-84 VIII. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION 1. ZONE CHANGE 84-1 - ORDINANCE NO. 910 It was moved by Hoesterey 'seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 910 have secondreadiing by title only. Larried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 910 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoestere , that Ordinance No. 910 be passed and adopted asfollows: ORDINANCE NO. 910 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RE -ZONING OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17361 MCFADDEN AVENUE FROM MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) DISTRICT TO RETAIL COMMERCIAL (C-1) DISTRICT 0^11 X511 vntn- AYES: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli NOES: None ABSENT: None 110 IX. OLD BUSINESS None. X. NEW BUSINESS 1. PARKING COMPLAINTS - 200 BLOCK W. SIXTH STREET b 500 BLOCK S. "Co STREET The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recom- mendation as contained in his report dated May 2, 1984. Charles Anderson, 255 West Sixth Street, relayed vehicle parking problems and incidents related to same. Council/staff discussion followed, and the Chief of Police reported methods they are legally empowered to use to resolve some of the parking problems. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to conduct a neighbor- hood meeting to discuss any proposed changes with respect to park- ing modifications that residents desire to implement along Sixth Street, "C" Street, or El Camino Real. Carried 5-0. 75 2. REPORT ON 40 PLUS ADULT SOFTBALL LEAGUE FEES The staff report and recommendation was presented by the Director of Community and Administrative Services as contained in the inter- com dated May 2, 1984, prepared by the Recreation Superintendent. Following a brief question -and -answer period, it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Saltarelli, to maintain a fee of 225, and eep the same number of games and awards. Carried 5-0. 41 3. LOCAL REGULATION OF FIREWORKS - RESOLUTION NO. 84-38 As recommended in the inter-com dated May 3, 1984, prepared by the City Attorney, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 84-38 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONCEPT OF LOCAL REGULATION OF FIREWORKS Motion carried 5-0. 52 CITY COUNCIL MINUTE. Page 6, 5-7-84 XI. REPORTS 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - APRIL 23, 1984 Mayor Kennedy expressed appreciation to the Planning Commission and staff for their work on Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 84-1 (Large Family Day Care Homes). Councilman Saltarelli reported that Planning Commissioner Kathy Weil has suggested that 1) the Council Chambers have an identifica- tion sign; and 2) an interior board be installed in the Chambers for noting agenda changes, etc. The City Manager indicated staff would investigate same. The Planning Commission Action Agenda of April 23, 1983, was rati- fied by unanimous informal consent. 80 2. TILLER DAYS PROGRESS REPORT It was moved by Hoestere , seconded by Kennedy, that the inter-com on subject item dated April17, 1384 prepared by the Community Services Department be received and filed. Carried 5-0. 34 3. REQUEST FROM PLANNING COMMISSION TO AFFIRM NEED TO INITIATE ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT LIMITING SPECIFIC USES IN THE IMMEDIATE VICIN- ITY OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS Following consideration of the inter-com report dated May 7, 1984, prepared by the Community Development Department, it was moved by Hoestere , seconded by Edgar, to receive and file same. Carried 81 XII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. THIRD QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT OF OPERATIONS The City Manager reported that the Third Quarter Financial Report of Operations has been provided to Council and suggested that it be reviewed in conjunction with a Budget workshop or as an agenda item, whichever Council desires. The budget will be delivered to Council the latter part of the week. 29 2. AUTHORIZED DELEGATE - LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to appoint Council- man Richard B. Edgar as Tustin's authorized voting delegate at the League of California Cities, Orange County Division, meeting to be held on May 10, 1984. Carried 5-0. 73 3. REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION The City Manager requested a Closed Session for discussion of legal matters. 4. OIL LEAKS ON CITY STREETS In response to Councilman Saltarelli 's complaint of an old vehicle parked in Tustin Meadows which leaks a great amount of oil, the Chief of Police requested that he be provided with the address of same. 5. KUDOS TO MAYOR KENNEDY Councilman Saltarelli was joined by Councilman Greinke in commend- ing Mayor Kennedy on conducting her first meeting as Mayor. 6. ABATEMENT OF OVERCROWDED HOUSING Councilman Greinke reported the City of Santa Ana has imposed jail terms on landlords for illegally overcrowded housing and requested that staff work with Santa Ana to see if Tustin can take the same type of action. . CI' INCIL MINUTES Pag` 5-7-84 7. BULLET TRAIN Councilman Hoesterey reported that American High Speed Rail's costly trip to Japan has proven unsuccessful in view of reactions expressed by several legislator's who attended, rode the bullet train, and reviewed economics of the project. 101 8. JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT Councilman Edgar requested that the Council strongly oppose con- tinued increase in air flights out of John Wayne Airport. 9. BID AWARD, COLUMBUS-TUSTIN WELL PROJECT In accordance with Councilman Edgar's concern and following Council/staff discussion, Council concurred to schedule a Redevel- opment Agency meeting on May 15, 199T,__a_t_S:00 p.m. for bid award of the Columbus Tustin Well project, to be followed by a City Coun- cil workshop regarding water deficiencies. 107 10. CONGRATULATIONS TO ENTIRE CITY STAFF Councilman Saltarelli congratulated all City departments and staff for the fine job they have done in the last 90 days which has had the greatest activity in Tustin's history, i.e., elections, bullet train, auto center, etc. 11. ACQUISITION OF RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY Councilman Hoesterey reported that homeowners have expressed inter- est in acquiring abandoned railroad land between the Peppertree and Tustin Meadows subdivisions. He requested that staff work with the homeowners from the standpoint of avoiding potential problems. The Director of Public Works stated he is presently working with the residents. 12. CONFIRMATION OF QUORUM FOR MAY 21, 1984, COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Kennedy reported that two Council members will be out of town on May 21, 1984, and was able to confirm a quorum will be present at subject Council meeting. XIII. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT - CLOSED SESSION; ADJOURNMENT At 9:19 p.m. it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Saltarelli, to recess to the Redevelopment gency, thence to a Closed Session for discussion of legal matters; and thence adjourn to a workshop regarding water deficiencies immediately following the Redevelopment Agency adjourned regular meeting on May 15, 1984, at 5:00 p.m., and thence to the next regular meeting on May 21, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. Carried 5-0. 9,�e�.e -9- .��` R 9 -CITY C4f a L K ACTIMG MAYOR, MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA MAY 7, 1984 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Kennedy at 9:19 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. 2. ROLL CALL Agency Members Present: Ursule E. Kennedy, Chairperson -Frank H. Greinke, Chairperson Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Donald J. Saltarelli Agency Members Absent: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Royleen A. White, Dir. of Admin. & Com. Services Approximately 20 in the audience 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved b Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve the minutes of the AprirT76, 1984, meeting. Carried b - U. 4. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve demands in the amount of $197,273.53 for the months OT Marchand April, 1984, as recom- mended by the Finance Director. Motion carried 5-0. 81 5. 1ST ANNUAL EL CAMINO REAL CHAMPIONSHIP CHILI COOK -OFF Mr. Hoesterey invited everyone to attend the Chili Cookoff to be held on El Camino Real between First and Main Streets on Sunday, June 3, 1984, from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 6. TUSTIN LIONS GARAGE SALE Mr. Greinke announced the Tustin Lions Club is holding the "World's Larg- est Garage Sale" on Saturday, May 12, 1984, at Tustin High School and extended an invitation to everyone to attend/participate. 7. ADJOURNMENT At 9:21 p.m. it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, that the Agency adjourn to an adjourned regular meeting on ay4, at 5:00 p.m., and thence to the next regular meeting on May 21, 1984. Carried 5-0. s" ACTING CHAIRPERSON 7 RECORDING ECRETAR Y Following the Closed Session, the Board of Directors authorized the City Attorney and the City Manager to negotiate the purchase of the Southern Pacific Land Company parcel (approximately 44,660 square feet) situated at the northwest corner of Irvine Blvd. and Newport Avenue for a price not to exceed $110,..30 per square foot. RLX91J.1 Nb � DATE: MARCH 10, 1982 �AtWftJ Inter -Coin TO: WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: BOB LEDENDECKER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WDEKS/CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: PARKING PROHIBITION AT EL CAMINO REAL AND SIXTH STREET RECOMMENDATION: That the Tustin City Council, at their meeting of March 15, 1982, authorize the red zoning of curbs at the intersection of E1 Camino Real at Sixth St., resulting in a loss of thirteen (13) on --street parking spaces, prior to the installation of the forthcoming traffic signal. BACKGROUND: As a result of the closure of "C" Street,, the City Council authorized the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of E1 Camino Real and Sixth Street. The installation of this signal will require the red zoning of curbs to provide improved intersection visibility and adequate turning radii for vehicular traffic. More recently, at their last meeting, the City Council expressed their desire to proceed with the red zoning prior to the signal installation. It is anticipated that the traffic signal plans and specifications will be presented to the City Councii at their April 5, 1982 meeting for authorization to advertise for bids. DISCUSSION: The attached drawing indicates the additional areas that will require parking removal for the forthcoming traffic signal installation. These areas are detailed below: STREET South leg of E1 (westerly side) North leg of El (westerly side) (easterly side) Westerly leg of (northerly side) (southerly side) ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES TO BE REMOVED Camino Real 1 Camino Real -- 2 1 6th St. -- 2 2 --- PARKING PROHIBITION AT EL CAMINO REAL AND SIXTH STREET MARCH 10, 1982 PAGE TWO STREET Easterly leg of 6th St. (northerly side) (southerly side) BOBE. E+ �. « " . DIRECTOR • PUBLIC WORKS/ CITY E- Attachment ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES TO BE REMOVED TOTAL 3 2 13 MINUTES OF A REGULAR METING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TILE CITY OF 7USTIN, CALIFORNIA March 15, 1982 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 3:12 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. 2. ROLL CALL $80,741.56 Agency Members Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp Agency Members Absent: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney Gillespie Construction, Buena Park William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager California Western, Placentia Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Fleming Engineering, Inc., Buena Parr: Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director A. M. Construction, Inc., Wh=ttier Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works R. J. Noble Company, Orange Ronald Nault, Finance Director All American Asphalt, Orange Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Sully -Miller Constracting Company, Orange Ken Fleagle, Planning Consultant Excel Paving Company, Long Beach Royleen White, Community Services Director Meyer Constructors, Highland Fred Wakefield, Captain, Police Department The low bid is 25€ below the engineer's estimate of $107,586.40, with Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk for the projects. As.recom- Approximately 30 in the audience 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Division, _t was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to award the con- It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve the minutes of the March 1, 1982, regular meeting. Carried 5-0. 4. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve General Demands for the month of February, 1982, in the amount of $38,186.07 as recom- mended by the Director of Finance. Motion carried 5-0. 81 S. BID AWARD - AI.IZ4 RECONSTR3CTION IM PROVEMMTS, PROJECTS I, II s III ;_ds for subject project were received as follows: Porter Construction Company, Santa Ana $80,741.56 Sun Paving Company, Santa Ana $86,132.01 Five States Plumbing, Orange $86,153.70 Hardy & Harper, Inc., Tustin $86,614.16 Gillespie Construction, Buena Park $89,190.60 California Western, Placentia $90,801.25 Fleming Engineering, Inc., Buena Parr: $95,149.12 A. M. Construction, Inc., Wh=ttier $95,266.25 R. J. Noble Company, Orange $97,927.71 All American Asphalt, Orange $100,457.15 Sully -Miller Constracting Company, Orange $102,222.05 Excel Paving Company, Long Beach $107,685.00 Meyer Constructors, Highland $108,071.30 The low bid is 25€ below the engineer's estimate of $107,586.40, with $102,000.00 in RDA funds presently budgeted for the projects. As.recom- mended in the report dated March 9, 1982, prepared by the Engineering Division, _t was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to award the con- tract for subject project to the _ow badder, Porter Construction Company? Inc., Santa Ana, in the amount of $80,741.58. Carried 5-0. 95 6. AGENCY CONCERNS - None. 7. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 3:15 p.m. to the next regular meeting on April 5, 1982. Carried 5-0. �rY�oM� • �iw CHAIRMAN RECORDID6C SECRETI�ty MINUTES OF A REGULAR M68TING OF THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way March 15, 1982 I. CALL Ta ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sharp at 3:15 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: III. PRE- SENTATION Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp None James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director Ken Fleagle, Planning Consultant Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Royleen White, Community Services Director Fred Wakefield, Captain, Police Department Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Approximately 30 in the audience 1. PRD=hMATION - 'RED CROSS mama The Mayor read and presented to Scott Tokarzewski, Red Cross Youth Volunteer, a proclamation designating March, 1982, as "Red Cross Month." 84 IV. PUBLIC CONCERNS 1. THE CALIFORNIAN TENANTS' ASSOCIATION - CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION Ric,: Horton, President of Californian Tenants' Association, pro- vided an update on the condominium conversion proposal h_• Cal - State Associates for the Californian Apartments and relayed problems residents are facing as outlined in his letter dated March 2, 1982. Mr. Horton added that aside from cosmetic repairs, no structural repairs are being made. Also, construc- tion on a temporary structure was commenced the week before, with 29 parking spaces removed for a storage area, without City permits. A stop work order was issued by the City, but Mr. Horton reported that work has been continuing on the project out of the public's view. The Community Development Director responded that no tentative map or final map has been filed, therefore, the City is pres- ently dealing with a Use Permit only and utilizing tentative map approva; as a mechanism by which to achieve compliance. He con- tinued that if a tenant has a specific problem, it should be reported to the Community Development Department, and an Inspec- tor will be sent out to that unit. That particular unit may then be "piecemeal -improved." Staff has been pressinc for sub- mittal of a comprehensive plan for the overall treatment. There is a Relocation Coordinator on-site now. Staff has informed Cal State Associates that any building permit issued, on either all or a portion of the project, constitutes implementation of the conversion. Even though the 120 days on the assistance program does not commence until May 18, when it will be automatic for all tenants, those tenants that would be specifically affected by any building permit would be automatically, immediately eligible for the relocation assistance program because the building permit would supersede the 120 -day waiting notice. As part of the Use Permit approval, the relocation plan will auto- matically go into effect on May 18 for all tenants. CITY cJUNCI:_ N.INU. Paye 2, 3-15-82 Cal State Associates has been informed by staff that enclosing the garages would be considered a building permit for those tenants whose garages or parking spaces were eliminated and the relocation assistance plan would be implemented for those units immediately, and a stop work order was issued on those building enclosures. A stop work order was not issued for removal. of some of the storage units within the parking garages, since it would have been granted regardless of whether a conversion was being considered or not. Normally the map and use permit are coterminous. In tris parti- cular case, without a subdivision map the requirement for 120- ddys' notice of intent to convert Is not enforceable until actual commencement of sales is within 120 days. Mr. Horton requested that Council consider implementing a time- table for completion of the conversion. Councilwoman Kennedy suggested that anything that threatens health, safety, or life be checked into and compliance encouraged. The City Attorney stated that under the approval given, the developer is required to file a proposed tenant relocation pur- chase plan with the City. Even though a document entitled "Highlights - Tenant Assistance Program" was filed last week, the developer should file a document with details of the tenant assistance and relocation for consideration by staff and approval by the Council or Planning Agency. Secondly, any waiver of conversion rights being signed by tenants does not have any application. City approval and Ordinance 822 require that anybody who was a tenant at the time of Use Permit approval in January, 1982, is entitled to receive relocation benefits. After further discussion, the City Attorney indicated staff could make available to all tenants copies of the document ent- tled "Fiai.lights" whic! has been filed with the City. If am, tenant has input approving/disapproving same, it should be filed with the Community Development Department. Ultimately, the project must have City approval. First, vu developer should provide and identify whatever the complete plan is, prow' de copies to the tenants, and staff can proceed from t�ier.e tc, make a recommendation to the Agencv. 7f and when a final document is filed, the developer can provide tenants with a copy of same. 43 V. CON SEN T CALENDAR Item 11 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Saltareili. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterev, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - March 1, 1982. 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $614,612.73. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $96,092.69. 50 3. RESOLUTION NO. 82-19 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, ORDERING THE CANVASS OL' MHE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TCS BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 1982, TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK Adoption of Resolution No. 82-19 as recommended by the City Clerk. 48 4. RESOLUTION NO. 82-20 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF ANAHEIM., BUENA PARK, ORANGE, AND OTHER ORANGE COUNTY CITIES AND ORGANIZA- TIONS TO BRING THE SUPER BOWL XX TO ANAHEIM STADIUM Adoption of Resolution No. 82-20 as requested by the City Council. 38 CIT: CIL KINJTES Page 3-15-82 5. RESOLUTION NO. 82-21 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, SUPPORTING RATIFICATION OF THE PERI- PHERAL CANAL REFERENDUM Adoption of Resolution No. 82-21 as requested by the City Council. 107 6. RESOLUTION NO. 82-22 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (EL CAMINO UTILITY UNDER- GROUND DISTRICT NO. 5 CONVERSIONS) Adoption of Resolution No. 82-22 as recommended by the Eng- neering Department. 104 The Director of Public Works responded to Councilman Edgar that th-'s contract provides the conduit for the telephone conversion, and actually has nothing to do with the conductor cable for telephone service; the telephone company will be converting that on their own. Also, staff is waiting for the telephone company to complete the conversion (approximately three weeks) until final accounting notices are sent out. 7. RESOLUTION NO. 82-23 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF GEN- ERAL SERVICES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO PURCHASE CERTAIN ITEMS (POLICE PATROL VEHICLES) (BUDGETED) Approve purchase of six police patrol vehicles at a total purchase price of $54,343.38 and adoption of Resolution No. 82-23 as recommended by the Chief of Police. 87 8. DENIAL OF CLAIM OF SCOTT 1CBELER - Date of Loss: 12-6-81, Filed With City: 2-11-82, Claim No. 82-4 Deny claim of Scott Keeler as recommended by the City Attor- ney. 40 9. DENIAL OF CLAIM Or PEARL MURRAY - Date of Loss: 12-6-81, Fiied With City: 2-11-82, Claim No. 82-5 Deny claim of Pearl Mut-ay as recommended by the City Attor- ney. 40 10. DENIAL OF CLAIM OF PETER OLIVARES - Date of Loss: '2-6-81, Filed With City: 2-11-82, Claim No. 82-6 Dene claim of Peter Olivares as recommended br the City Attornev. 40 r Consent Calendar Item No. 11 - :'_nce the City is not a member of the Southern California Associatior. of Governments (SCAG), Councilman Saltarelli questioned the necessity of the resolution, which would commit the City to a regional sedimentation program (established by SCAG) and require a great deal of staff time. The City Manager and Director of Public Works provided clarifica- tion, stating that the City is under a State/Federal mandate to comply with the program; a need tc increase staff is not envisioned; the program is for the betterment of the regional area; this is being proposed in the form of a resolution in lieu of an ordinance which SCAG has been promoting; and it is more of a voluntary compli- ance ompl:ance and cooperation rather than a stiff, regulatory measure, which may be the ultimate. In response to the Mayor, Councilman Saltarelli stated he would be in favor of the resolution so long as the last paragraph in the resolution is loose enough that the City cannot be forced to create an ordinance unless both the City and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RW2CB) agree that the voluntary program is ineffective. The City Manager stated that is the intent. In any case, the item would come back to Council and allow the opportunity to take whatever direction would be appropriate. The resolution merely indicates a statement of intent. 7ITY COUNCIL MINUJTES Page 4, 3-15-82 It was then moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following resolution as recommended by the Engineering Depart- ment: 11. RESOLUTION NO. 82-24 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin APPROVING THE IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE SOUTH COAST AREAWIDE WASTE TREATMENT MA14AGEMENT PLAN APPLICABLE TO THE CITY Motion carried 5-0. VI. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None 107 VII. ORDI- NANCES FOR ADOPTION 1. ORDINANCE NO. 869 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin REZONING 13681 REDHILL AVENUE FROM R-3 (2700) TO R-3 ( 1960 ) It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 869 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 5_-0. Following reading of the title by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edctar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 869 be passed and adopted. Roll call vote: AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp NOES: None ABSENT: None 110 VIII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. TILLER DAYS COMMITTEE REQUEST Chsrill Webb, Tiller Days Chairperson, reported that the com- m- :tee has looked into a couple of sources for the third power p,le. One is the Marine ^ores and the other is a private source. Nothinc has materialized from ether as vet. if neither of the two sources comes through, the Committee needs commitment from the City because they feel they cannot do tine Tiller Days without the third pole and electricity. in response to Councilman Hoesterey, Ms. Webb responded that last year, fuses were blown and circuit breakers went of_` wit' the existing eauipment, and many booth renters die not have the r .�ctricity they needea. In res^•tense to the '.a-1 the Community Services Director reporte(' that Southern California Edison Company does not get involved ..n the hardware end. Gene Carter, Southern Califor^.ia Edson, ._rarified that the pole is not the issue; it's the com- mercial b -)x, wiring, etc., that is expensive, which Edson Co:►r- "any does not handle. Ms. Webb responded to Councilman Hoesterey that 10 of the 25 booths would have to be eliminated, along with the pancake breakfast, if activities are to be accommodated by ex -'sting equipment. She added that generators are extremely costly and noisy. In response to Councilwoman Kennedy, the Community Services Director stated that City use of the third pole cannot be just= fien, e:•e:: for Fourth of July activities; and Tiller Days is not envisioned as becoming self- supporting for approximately five years. Following further Council discussion, Coun-:7_1 concurred that Cou,,cilmembers Edgar and Kennedy meet with "::. Webb to attempt to reach a solution. 34 VIII. NEW BUSINESS =1 NCIL MINUTES Page 3-15-82 1. BID AWARD - RED HILL AVENUE AHFP PROJECT NO. 1064 Bids for subject project were received as follows: R. J. Noble Co., Orange All American Asphalt, Orange Blair Paving, Inc., Yorba Linda Five States Plumbing, Orange Lee Construction Corp., Mission Viejo Porter Construction Co., Santa Ana Griffith Co., Irvine Sully -Miller Contracting Cu., Orange Red Hill Construction Co., Inc., Santa Ana Hardy & Harper, Inc., Tustin Harmon B. J. Gladd Const. Co., Los Angeles $130,964.95 $134,933.33 $136,488.68 $138,063.50 $140,774.79 $142,681.14 $146,919.95 $153,891.30 $156,340.10 $162,405.48 $ 183,709.10 The low bid is 24.8% below the engineer's estimate of $174,170.30, with $107,800 in gas tax funds budgeted for the City's share of the project. Based on the low bid, the cost split for the project is as follows: City Share $ 54,395.93 County Share 76,569.02 Total $130,964.95 As recommended in the report dated March 9, 1982, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to award the contract for subject project to the low bidder, R. J. Noble Company, Orange, in the total amount of $130,964.95. Motion carried 5-0. 95 2. PARKING PROHIBITION AT EL CAI+IINO REAL & SIXTH STREET The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recommendation. Pursuant to his report dated March 10, 1982, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize the red zor._ng of curbs at the intersection of E1 Camino Real at Sixth Street, result ino in a loss of 13 on -street parkina spaces, prior to the installation of the forthcoming traffic signal. Carried 5-0. 75 3. UNIT FEE FOR MULTIPLE UNITS SERVICED BY ONE WATER METER The Cit, Manager presented the staff report and recommends=ion and stated that the effective date for the adjusted b -'-monthly water usage rates and charges would be April 19, 1982. It was then moved Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterev, to adopt the following rt -solution - RESOLUTION NO. 82-25 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, ADJUSTING TUSTIN WATER SERVICE RATES Motion carried 5-0. 4. DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR GAME ARCADES 107 The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation. He stated staff recommends approval of the provisions outlined in Alternative I'_ as contained in the report dated March 15, 1982, prepared by the Community Development Department. A question -and -answer period followed. After further Council discussion, it was moved b, Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to refer the matte- back to the Police Department for input. The Community Development Director reported that the Use Permit moratorium for arcades expires in May. The ►notion carried 5-0. 81 CIM' CIJJWCI;, M.IN'�TE: Paqe 6, 3-15-62 IX. OTHER BUSINESS 1. CITY !TANAGER The City Manager stated he has distributed to Council a report on fund balances for the Redevelopment Agency and will answer any Agency questions at the next regular meeting. 2. SIDEWALK CONDITION AT RED HILL & WALNUT Councilman Saltarelli stated he has received citizen complaints regarding the dilapidated con -tion of the asphalt sidewalk at Red Hill and Walnut. He rea_uested that staff look into the matter. 92 3. SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY COUNCIL Councilman Hoesterey reported that the California League of Cities, Orange County Division, unanimously appointed Ruby May as a voting delegate to the Orange County Senior Citizens Advi- sory Council as recommended by the City Council. 28 4. PMI70RING OF STATE FUNDING Councilman Hoest�-rey provided a report of some current State funding cutbacks. He suggested that staff monitor the State's actions as the City goes into the budgetary process, that unfunded State mandates be identified, and that list be provided to the League of Cities so it can be combined with those of other cities and lobbying commenced to get them removed. The City Manager indicated staff would provide such a list at the next regular meeting. 29 5. DIAL -A -RIDE Councilwoman Kennedv inru-'red if there was a problem with the Dial -A- Ride program, as sne has received citizen concerns that the system has been changed, they are no longer using two-way radios, etc. Tne Director of Public Works stated he would iooi: into the matter and report bac;:. 101 6. SEGERSTROM DEVELOPMENT X. ADJOURNMENT The Mavor inquired about the tim_- schedule for the Seger-trom Development on Newport. Staff responded that it would be opti- mistic if it readies completion in 1983-84. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by S:-rn, to adjourn at ::37 p.n.. in memory of Walter Rawlings to -11-ht- :iext reaslar meeting on April 5, 1982. Carried 5-0. 84 '714f -Y CLERK f