Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1982 03 01 MIMUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way March l, 1982 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey at 4:19 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli Councilpersons Absent: Sharp . ~ Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director j~ R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director = Dale Wick, Assistant City Engineer Judi Ormsby, Recreation Supervisor Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Approximately 15 in the audience RECESS; RECONVENED The Council recessed at 4:20 p.m. for set-up of the following pre- sentation. The meeting was reconvened at 4:26 p.m. with Mayor Sharp absent · IIII. PRE- SENTATION 1. OPANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT -- PERIPHERAL CANAL Gordon Elser, Information Officer, Orange County Water District, gave a slide presentation on the Peripheral Canal Project and requested Council's support of Proposition 9 which includes the Peripheral Canal as well as other facilities. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to agendize a resolution in sup- port of Proposition 9 for the March 15 meeting. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. IV. PUBLIC COMCERNS None · V. COMSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES- February 16, 1982. 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $172,582.57. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $96,820.85. 50 3. RESOLUTION NO. 82-5- A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR ANI- MAL SHELTER AND ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES Adoption of Resolution No. 82-5 as recommended by the City Attorney. 23 4. RESOLUTIUN NO. 82-16- A Resolution Of the City Council Of the City Of Tustin, California, ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCTS AND POLLING PLACES, APPOINTING PRECINCT BOARD MEMBERS AND FIXING COMPENSATION FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF SAID CITY TUESDAY, APR/L 13, 1982, HERETOFORE CALLED BY RESOLUTION NO. 81-142 OF THE CITY COUNCIL Adoption of Resolution No. 82-16 as recommended by the City Clerk · 48 cITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 3-1-82 5. RESOLUTION NO. 82-17- A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND SIGN AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES Adoption of Resolution No. 82-17 as recommended by the Personnel Director. 79 6. REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL- 14681 EMERYWOOD Removal of two parkway trees in front of 14681 Emerywood with no replacement of the one near the fire hydrant and the other one to be replaced with a tree from the City-approved list, selected by Mrs. Black, as recommended by the City Engineer · 86.1 7, 1RVINE BOULEVARD FEDERAL AID URBAN (FAU) PROJECT Authorize the Mayor to execute Program Supplement No. 3 to Local Agency/State Agreement No. 07-5271. 45 8. DENIAL OF CLAIM OF GEORGE EDWARDS - Date of Loss: 11-2-81, Filed With City: 1-15-82, Claim No. 82-2 Deny claim of George Edwards as recommended by the City Attorney · 40 9o NOMINATION OF RUBY MAY TO VOTING MEMBERSHIP ON ORANGE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZenS ADVISORY COUNCIL Recommended to direct staff to prepare a letter to the Orange County Division, League of Cities, recommending Ruby May as a VOting member to the Orange County Senior Citizens Advisory Council, authorize the Mayor to sign this letter, and authorize and encourage Councilmembers to voice their support for Mrs. May to appropriate League officials. 28 10. RESOLUTION NO. 82-18- A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING THE BAIL SCHEDULE FOR TUSTIN CITY CODE VIOLATIONS Adoption of Resolution No. 82-18 as recommended by the Police Chief. 82 VI. ORDINANCES FOR ]NTRODUCTION - None ~12I. ORDI- NANCES FOR ADOPTION 1 . ORDINANCE NO. 868 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 6, IRVINE BOULEVARD, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONVERSION It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No'; 868 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 4-0, Sharp absent. Following reading of the title by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 868 be passed and adopted. Roll call vote: AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli NOES: None ABSENT: Sharp 104 VIII · OLD ! ~ BUSINESS , 1 . TILLER DAYS COMMITTEE REQUEST The City Manager presented the staff report and recommendation. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey, the City Manager stated the pole would supplement the two poles available through the School District for activities after the parade, not strictly for night activities. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 3-1-82 In response to Councilman Edgar, the City Manager and Recreation Supervisor responded that set-up of the pole would be handled by the School District. Council discussion followed regarding the amount of use the third pole would have, and the possibility of passing some of the costs on to booth renters. The Mayor Pro Ten recognized Margaret Byrd in the audience, who stated that some people do not rent booths due to the present rental rate. The Recreation Supervisor noted that the booth rental rate is $75.00 with the number of booths at approximately 40. She noted that Cherrill Webb would be available at the evening session. The City Manager suggested that Council continue the matter to the next meeting, with staff to report on possible uses for the equipment and a payback schedule through a surcharge on the booths. The Director of Finance interjected that the total City contribution in two years has been $12,000 plus an addi- tional $300-$400 annually for insurance coverage. Prior to that, the City contributed approximately $2,500. In three years, the City has not received any return on that investment. Council concurred to continue the matter to March 15, 1982. 34 IX. NEW BUSINESS 1. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION - PURCHASE OF POLICE DEPARTMENT TAPES The City Manager presented the staff report and recommendation. As recommended in the memo dated February 24, 1982, prepared by the City Manager, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to authorize supplemental appropriation of $5,100 from the General fund unrestricted balance for the purchase of 100 tapes to be used in the taping of police communications. Motion carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 82 2. SIGN CODE EXCEPTION - MERCURY SAVINGS, 1095 IRVINE BOULEVARD The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation. Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the report dated March 1, 1982, it was moved by Saltarelli, sec- onded by Kennedy, to approve the request from Mercury Savings for a 4 sq. ft. sign (8'x6"). Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 93 X · OTHER BUSINESS 1. CITY MANAGER The City Manager announced the following public meetings: March 2, Costa Mesa City Hall, 7:00 p.m., for the North-South Central Corridor Study; March 18, Irvine High School; and March 16, Mission Viejo High School, for the Foothill Corridor Route Location Study. Staff is monitoring the items and will make periodic reports to Council. 2. COUNCILMAN SALTARELLI In response to Councilman Saltarelli, the Community Development Director clarified that the policy to schedule public hearings of great interest or not of a routine nature for the evening session applies to the Planning Agency, and Council policy is that all public hearing items are to be scheduled for 7:30 p.m. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, that fairly rou- tine City Council public hearings be scheduled for the afternoon meetings, and if a significant number of people are interested in the hearing, it can be continued to the evening session. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 3-1-82 Councilwoman Kennedy stated she could not support the motion and suggested the matter be tabled pending the proposed formation of the planning Commission after the April election. She continued that 75% of the population works, and it is difficult for those who do work to monitor Council action. Councilman Hoesterey stated that there are some public hearing items that carry a great deal of public interest and public input, and there are things covered in public hearings that appear to be fairlyroutine.'~ Following further discussion, the motion carried 3-1, Kennedy opposed, Sharp absent. ~ 83 3o SUPERBOWL IN ANAHEIM STADIUM It was moved by Edgar, seconded b~ Noestere~, to agendize a resolution in support of a future Super Bowl being held at Ana- helm Stadium. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 38 4. RED CURBING ON EL CAMINO REAL In response to Councilman Edgar's co~unents regarding red curbing at Sixth Street and E1 Camino Real, the Director of Public Works reported that staff does have a red curb plan which was to ,be implemented with the signal installation. He indicated that staff can proceed with the red curbing prior to signal installa- tion, and suggested that Council review same. Council concurred to agendize the plan for review. 92 5. ANNEXATION SURVEY - IRVINE/WASS Following consideration of the report dated February 23, 1982, prepared by Dr. R. K. Fleagle, Planning Consultant, it was moved b~ Edgar, seconded b~ Saltarelli, to authorize staff to conduct an opinion survey of the Irvine/Wass area to determine if an annexation proposal is feasible for subject area. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. 24 XI, RECESS -- EVENING It was moved b~ Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to recess at 5:06 p.m. to the 7:30 p.m. evening session. Carried 4-0, Sharp absent. CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED 7:30 P.M. MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sharp at 7:34 p.m. IIo ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Edgar, Noesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp Councilpersons Absent: None Others present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Com. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Roy Gonzales, personnel Director CharlesThayer, Police Chief Approximately 25 in the audience III. PUBLIC CONCENS None. CITY COUNCIL M/NUTES Page 5, 3-1-82 IV. PUBLIC HEARING 1. ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-1 - 13681 RED HILL AVENUE ORDINANCE NO. 869 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, REZONING 13681 REDHILL AVENUE FROM R-3 (2700) TO R-3 ( 1960 ) Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, reported that this Zone Change was requested by the applicant and involves 4 lots north of San Juan on the west side of Red Bill. This change would permit him to build a fourplex instead of a tri- plex. Based upon the square footage proposed, the 2 spaces per unit is sufficient parking · This Zone Change is within the General Plan. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:39 p.m. There being no con}- ments or objections, it was closed by the Mayor. It was moved by Edgar, seconded b~ Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 869 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Follow- ing the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 869 by the City Clerk, it was moved b~ Edgar, seconded blx Hoesterey, to intro- duce Ordinance No. 869. Motion carried 5-0. 110 OTHER BUSINESS 1. JOINT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Manager reminded the Council of the joint Redevelopment Agency and City Council meeting on March 8, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. 2. RECOGNITION OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Councilwoman Kennedy recognized students from the Tustin High School Civic class. ADJOURNMENT It was moved b~ Edgar, seconded b~ Boestere~z, to adjourn at 7:41 p.m. to the joint Adjourned Redevelopment Agency and City Coun- cil meeting on March 8, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Cham- bers and thence to the next regular meeting on March 15, 1982.