Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNB 2 EIR MCAS CONS 09-21-92E N DA NEW BUSINESS N0. 2 9-21-92 Inter -Com SATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 1992 �a TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - PREPARATION OF REUSE/SPECIFIC PLAN AND JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND sromma IM. - RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Tustin and HNTB. BACKGROUND The Defense Base Realignment and Closure Act of 1990 (PL101-510; commonly referred to as BRAC 91) mandated the closure and realignment of military bases throughout the United States. One of the facilities selected for closure was MCAS, Tustin. It was further mandated that the principal mission of the facility (namely operation of helicopters) be transferred to facilities to be constructed at MCAS, Twentynine Palms as well as at Camp Pendleton. Due to the significant construction lead time needed to complete replacement improvements (currently estimated at four years), the U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) have requested that the City of Tustin fast-track the normal reuse plan process which can normally take 2- 3 years. Marketing of the site to one or more development entities also necessitates that the City and the military be prepared to commit to a certain level of development entitlement to ensure a level of developer confidence in the profit potential of the MCAS, Tustin site. The Marine Corps request for a rapid completion of a base reuse plan, with guaranteed development entitlements, requires a much more intensive, complex and costly program than would otherwise be expected from the City. The City, therefore, explored mechanisms for fast -tracking preparation of the plan and granting of development entitlements and proposed to the USMC the preparation of a specific plan and joint Environmental Impact Statement/Report (EIS/EIR) to assess the potential environmental impacts of disposal, reuse and retention of various portions of the Air Station. City Council Report Approval of MCAS Consultant Services Agreement September 21, 1992 Page 2 Neither the City nor Marine Corps had existing in-house staffing adequate in size to accomplish the necessary program tasks for such an undertaking, particularly given the proposed fast-track schedule. As a result, the City of Tustin, with full support from the USMC, agreed to seek a multi -disciplinary consultant team to prepare the proposed Reuse Plan/Specific Plan and joint EIR/EIS for the project. A Request for Proposal (RFP) for the project was sent to a total of 85 consulting firms. Responses to the RFP were received from 17 firms. A first round interview committee comprised of key personnel from the USMC at MCAS, Tustin and City Departments established a set of selection criteria to be used to evaluate proposals. After a lengthy evaluation and screening on proposals, the top nine (9) consultant teams were invited to participate in an oral interview. As a result of these interviews, the following top three (3) consultant teams were also interviewed by the Base Closure Steering Committee: Gruen/Cotton Beland Associates Roma Design Group Howard, Needles, Tammen and Bergendoff (HNTB) Upon conclusion of the final oral interviews, including detailed reference checks of each firm and tabulated scoring, the Steering Committee unanimously directed the Assistant City Manager to negotiate a contract with the firm of HNTB, contingent upon renegotiation of responsibilities for environmental work. The renegotiated contract with HNTB now addresses all concerns of the Steering Committee. It should also be pointed out that HNTB has assembled a team of notable subconsultants to assist in the project with their key roles defined as follows: • Cotton/Beland - Joint Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) • Planning Center - Specific Plan Collaboration, Community Participation • Austin -Foust - Traffic Modeling • Thirtieth Street - Historic/Cultural Resources • Economic Research Associates - Market/Fiscal Analysis Two of the above firms, Austin Foust and Cotton/Beland, are presently under contract with the City. City Council Report Approval of MCAS Consultant Services Agreement September 21, 1992 Page 3 The Specific Plan and joint EIR/EIS is expected to be completed within eighteen (18) months. The Specific Plan will be a major undertaking involving data collection and analysis, issue identification, formulation of goals and objectives, coordination and facilitation of extensive interagency and public participation and creation of a suitable strategy to guide future reuse of the Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin. The City of Tustin's Base Closure Task Force has already been established as the local vehicle to ensure that any reuse planning of MCAS, Tustin is carefully thought out and coordinated. Through the Task Force, it is hoped that consensus can be reached and that differing visions for the future of the Base can be resolved. The Base Reuse Task Force, comprised of 15 community, county and other interjurisdictional organizations has already.begun the process of meeting to discuss future use of the site. The proposed Consultant Services Agreement for the project is attached. Compensation in preparation for the Base Reuse Specific Plan and joint EIR/EIS is proposed at a not to exceed contract amount of $800,000. The City of Tustin' s grant request to the Department of Defense for a grant of $750,000 towards the project was approved on July 24, 1992. The City of Tustin will be required to make a $25,000 direct contribution toward the project during fiscal year 1992-1993 which is included in the City's budget request and an additional $25,000 contribution in fiscal year 1993-1994. City of Tustin staff will also coordinate, direct and manage completion of the project. As such, the City will be making a significant in-kind contribution of staff time in the amount of approximately $120,000. u' C ristine A. Shinglet(n Assistant City Manager Community Development CAS:kbc\mcascons.cas CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (herein "Agreement"), is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF TUSTIN (herein "City"), a municipal corporation and HNTB (herein "Consultant"). WHEREAS, Consultant is qualified to provide the necessary services and has agreed to provide such services; and WHEREAS, Consultant has submitted to Agency a proposal, dated August 25, 1992, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" , and is by this reference incorporated herein as though set forth in full hereat (hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal"). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual benefits which will result to the parties in carrying out the terms of this Agreement, Agency agrees to employ and does hereby employ Consultant to provide consulting services as follows: 1.0 SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, (the "services" or the "work"). Consultant warrants that all services will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner in accordance with all standards prevalent in the industry. 1.2 Consultant's Proposal. The Scope of Services shall include the Consultant's proposal incorporated herein as "Exhibit B" as though fully set forth herein. In the event of 1 0 any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal (Exhibit B) and this Agreement, including Exhibits A, Cr D, E and F, the terms of this Agreement and Exhibits A, C, D, E and F, shall govern. 1.3 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all Federal, State of California laws, and the ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City of Tustin and the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency. 1.4 Licenses and Permits. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 1.5 Familiarity with Scope of Services. By executing this Contract, Consultant warrants that Consultant (a) has thoroughly investigated and considered the work to be performed, (b) has generally acquainted itself with the site of the work and conditions there existing and (c) has carefully considered the means and methods for performance (d) fully understands the facilities, difficulties, restrictions attending performance of the work under this Agreement. Should the Consultant discover any latent or previously unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work or as represented by the City, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed with any work except at Consultant's risk until written 2 instructions are received from the contract officer. 1.6 Care of Work. The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to prevent loss or damage to materials, papers and other components thereof to minimize losses of damages and shall be responsible for all such damages until acceptance of work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own.negligence. 1.7 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services (Exhibit "A") when directed to do so by the Contract Officer, provided that Consultant shall not be required to perform any additional services without additional, reasonable compensation. Any additional compensation not exceeding ten percent (10%) of the Contract sum may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer. Any greater increase must be approved by the City Manager. 1.8 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit "C" and any other provision of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit "C" shall govern. 2.0 COMPENSATION 2.1 For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, the 3 Consultant shall be compensated a maximum contract amount of $800,000 (herein "Contract Sum") in accordance with Exhibit D (attached). 2.2 Method of Payment. In any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, Consultant shall, no later than the first (1st) working day of such month, submit to the City in a form approved by City, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. City will pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than the last working day of said month. 2.3 Changes. In the event of any change or changes in the scope of work requested by City, the parties hereto shall execute an addendum to this Agreement, setting forth with particularity all terms of the Addendum, including but not limited to any additional compensation to Consultant. Addenda may be entered into: A. To provide for additional services not included in this Agreement; B. To provide for revisions or modifications to documents or other work product or work when documents or other work product are required by the enactment or revision of law subsequent to preparation of any documents, other product or work. 2.4 Payment for Changes Approved change orders shall be compensated in amounts not in excess of personnel hourly rates shown in Exhibit "D" and must be previously agreed to in writing by the contract officer. 4 2.5 Statement of Costs. Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Section 7550, the total amount expended by City relating to the preparation of any reports and documents prescribed herein shall be set forth within the final editions thereof, in a separate section, in a statement substantially as follows: "Pursuant to California Government Code Section 7550 the City of Tustin expended the total amount of $ for the preparation of this report and/or documents." 3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All services rendered pursuant to this agreement will continue within the time period established in the "Schedule of Performance" attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and incorporated herein by this reference. Extension of any time period specified in Exhibit "D" must be approved in writing by the contract officer. 3.3 Force Majeure. Time for performance of services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement may be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, acts of the Government, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such 5 condition notify the Contract Officer who shall thereupon ascertain the facts and the extent of necessary delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the contract officer's judgement such delay is justified, and the Contract Officer's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 7.5 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the subject project. 4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK _. 4.1 Representative of Consultant. The following Principal of the Consultant is hereby designated as being the principal and representative of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: Ron Hartj e HNTB 4 Executive Circle, Suite 190 Irvine, California 92715 It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principal was a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Principal shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of 0 Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The foregoing Principal may not be changed by Consultant without the express written approval of City. 4.2 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be Christine Shingleton, Assistant City Manager or as otherwise may be designated in writing from time to time by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the prior, express, written approval of the City. In addition, neither.this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Consultant shall perform all services required herein, except as may otherwise be provided 7 herein. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent consultant with only such obligations as are consistent with that role and the provisions of this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are employees or agents of City. 5.0 INSURANCE INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS 5.1 Insurance. Consultant shall procure, maintain and pay all premiums for, at its own cost, and shall submit to City, concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, certificates of insurance in form satisfactory to the City Attorney of Tustin public liability and property damage insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Consultant's performance under this Agreement. Only certificates issued by insurance companies which are rated "A" in the Best Rating Guide or in the Federal Register will be acceptable. Consultant shall also carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Workers' Compensation laws. Such insurance shall be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement and shall not be revised, modified or cancelled without thirty (30) days' prior written notice of proposed cancellation to City. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming the City of Tustin as an additional named insured shall be delivered to and approved by the City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant's obligation to indemnify the City, its consultants or employees. The amount of insurance required hereunder shall include comprehensive general liability, personal injury and automobile liability with limits of at least $1,000,000 combined and single limit per occurrence and professional liability coverage with limits of at least $500,000 combined or single limit per occurrence. 5.2 Indemnification. The Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City of Tustin, its officers and employees, from and against any and all officers and employees, from and against any and all actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and attorney's fees, for injury to or death of person(s) and for willful misconduct, for damage to property (including property owned by the City) and for negligent errors and omissions committed by Consultant, its officers, employees and agents, arising out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement, except for such loss as maybe caused by city's own negligence or that of its officers or employees. 6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS 6.1 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. 9 6.2 Records. Consultant shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement,- and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership of the documents and materials hereunder. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use and shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. 6.4 Release of Documents. All drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Consultant in the performance of services under this Agreement shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer. 7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and fM interpreted both as to validity, performance and obligations 10 of the parties, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action related to performance under this Agreement. 7.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefore. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party cures any default within ninety (90) days after service of the notice, or if the cure of the default is commenced within thirty ( 3 0 ) days after service of said notice and is cured within a reasonable time after commencement; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare, the City may take immediate action under Section 7.5. Compliance with the provisions of this Section shall be a condition precedent to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured. 7.3 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy. of a non -defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. 11 City's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Consultant. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.4 Right and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.5 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 7.6 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant and constitutes an immediate danger to health, safety and general welfare, the period of notice shall 12 be such shorter time as deemed appropriate by City. Upon receipt of the notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services, rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter. 7.7 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent- that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated, provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages, and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated. 7.9 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit from the losing party. 8.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NON DISCRIMINATION 8.1 Non -liability of City and City Officers and Employees. No officer employee of the City of Tustin shall be personally 13 liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or City of Tustin or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 8.2 Covenant against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure the applicants are employed and _.._ that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry. 9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by pre -paid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated in forty- eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. 14 To City: CITY OF TUSTIN 15222 Del Amo Avenue Tustin, CA 92680 Attention: Contract Officer Christine Shingleton, Assistant City Manager To Consultant: HNTB HNTB Ronald Wortman Ronald Hartje, Partner 4 Executive Circle 4 Executive Circle Irvine, CA 92715 Irvine, CA 92715 9.2 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties and cannot be amended or modified except by written agreement. 9.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing. 9.4 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 9.5 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below. CITY DATED: CONSULTANT: IOCN0:401 DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: James G. Rourke City Attorney CAS:kbc\hntbmcas 16 City of Tustin, a municipal corporation By. William A. Huston City Manager HNTB By. Corporate Officer Name, Title By. . Corporate Officer Name, Title Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Exhibit D: Exhibit E: Exhibit F: INDEX OF EXHIBITS Scope of Work Consultant's Proposal Special Requirements Attachments a) Certificate of Insurance Form Compensation Schedule of Performance Grant Agreement EXHIBIT "Al' SCOPE OF WORK 9/1/92 EXHIBIT A MARINE CORPS AIR STATION TUSTIN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR BASE DISPOSAL AND REUSE SCOPE OF WORK 1.0 OVERALL PROTECT MANAGEMENT The City requires that all necessary planning and environmental services for the Base Disposal and Reuse Scope of Work be completed by Consultant within eighteen (18) months. The Consultant will, therefore, be responsible for assuming a complete project coordinator/manager role. This, at minimum, will include the following: 1.1 Consultant shall designate project manager and assemble the consultant team and administer all sub -consultant contracts for professional services, special studies and reports needed to support the necessary planning and environmental services for Base Disposal and Reuse. 1.2 Consultant shall direct and supervise efforts of the consultant team through all aspects of the project. Consultant shall evaluate all draft program documents from sub -consultants prior to release to City. Consultant shall monitor team performance in completing tasks on schedule and apprise the City of team progress at monthly intervals. 1.3 Consultant shall facilitate on-going correspondence between the consultant team and key project participants, including City staff, the Marine Corps, the Steering Committee, the Base Closure Task Force and other affected agencies and parties of interest. 1.4 Consultant shall participate in meetings with City and Marine Corps representatives, outside agencies, Base Closure Task Force meetings and public workshops throughout the project, as well as Planning Commission and City Council Public Hearings, and meetings necessary for exchange of information, resolution of decisions and review of project's progress. 1.5 Consultant shall coordinate and expedite the flow of information between City departments, consultants, the Marine Corps and other agencies. 1.6 Consultant shall maintain a master schedule, budget and cost control system which identifies all major activities for the project, time and money expended and actual and budgeted costs. Such schedule and cost information shall be tracked using a computerized management system. At a minimum, a monthly update of a critical path method (cpm) timeline for all project deliverables shall be completed, including for public notices and meetings. The schedule shall accommodate an eighteen (18) month completion schedule (target date for publishing a Record of Decision) and allow for a thirty (30) day government review of all document submittals. Public review periods mandated by CEQA and NEPA shall also be accommodated in the schedule. Consultant will be responsible for review of project's progress against the master schedule, informing the City and Marine Corps of variances from the schedule and recommending and implementing corrective actions including alternatives to keep project on -schedule. 1.7 Consultant shall prepare and distribute copies of a monthly executive report outlining overall project status in terms of schedule, budget and team performance. 1.8 Consultant shall hold review conferences after each document submittal to discuss comments received. 1.9 Entry onto military installations is a privilege granted by the commanding officer of the activity. Conditions of access and security must be adhered to by the Consultant at all times. Permission for entry onto the project site must be coordinated with the Marine Corps. The Consultant may be required to subordinate their schedule to the military's schedule of operations in the project area. 1.10 Products: letters, meeting summaries, project schedules, flow charts, program reports, general memoranda, and monthly statements of services, reports to task force, steering committee, Planning Commission and City Council meetings. 2.0 PROTECT ORGANIZATION This initial effort involves bringing all members of the consultant team together, including personnel from the City and Marine Corps for project orientation and refinement of the work program. Consultant's project orientation will include, at a minimum: field visits to the project site and surrounding communities by the project team and meetings with personnel from responsible agencies. It is envisioned that this organizational effort will result in definitive project tasks and product submittals as well as work performance schedules. 2 �_. Cost effective means of assembling, storing, updating and disseminating the tremendous volumes of data that will be generated during the course of the project will be required. The consultant team shall establish a clearinghouse or repository and locator system for various reports, drawings, photographs, and other documents 3.0 BACKGROUND ANALYSIS The primary focus of this task will be to gather background information to provide a detailed inventory of the physical and environmental characteristics of MCAS, Tustin and its surrounding adjacent communities. The background information will serve as the database for plan preparation in addition to providing information for the environmental setting portion of the documentation - Environmental Impact Report and Statement (EIR/EIS). Current September 1991 aerial photographs of the site, flown by Airborne Systems for the Marine Corps, are available for procurement by the consultant. Automated base maps will also be available from the Marine Corps in Integraph Bentley Microstation format. The consultant will be responsible for reproduction of maps for their use. Accuracy of the base maps is not guaranteed. However, they are estimated to be reasonably current. For purposes of this scope, "Site" shall mean MCAS, Tustin encompassing the existing boundaries of the base; "Reuse Area" shall mean those areas of MCAS, Tustin planned for disposal by the Marine Corps; "Retained Area" shall mean those areas of MCAS, Tustin to be retained for use by the Marine Corps. 3.1 A thorough review of all existing planning and environmental documents, as -built plans, maps, aerials shall be completed by Consultant to assure maximum utilization of existing data. Evaluate background and environmental information available to determine topic areas in which data needs to be generated or updated. 3.2 Consultant shall review existing field surveys and studies (completed or underway by the Marine Corps.) and supplement with other field surveys, research and studies to identify local geology, as well as existing conditions related to facilities, land uses, transportation systems, services, noise, air quality, toxics and hazardous materials, etc. Typical factors in this process shall include compilation of at least the following: 3.2.1 Existing landform & elevations 3.2.2 Geotechnical assessment 3.2.3 Soil and ground water contamination assessment. The Marine Corps will be conducting on-going investigations of contamination during the course of this contract. All information will be made available to the Consultant 3 by the Marine Corps as it is developed for incorporation into consultant's work. 3.2.4 Hydrology - includes compilation of drainage characteristics of site including 100 year flood plain analysis and the effects of the regional drainage systems on the site. An identification of existing drainage facilities, flood control systems (age, physical condition, location, capacity) and related hydrology information will be provided by the Marine Corps. 3.2.5 Biological resources - vegetation, wildlife & habitat, sensitive resources 3.2.6 Cultural resources (1) archaeological/paleontogical with source data available from the Marine Corps including record and reconnaissance review (2) historical architecture - documentation of historical significance of two lighter -than -air (blimp) hangars (age, condition, constraints of reuse); any other historical buildings on site (e.g. WWII era facilities). The Marine Corps will provide source data on all MCAS buildings and structures including, to the extent available, historical information. Coordination with the State Historic Preservation Office, and Federal Advisory Council on Historic Preservation will be required by the Consultant. 3.2.7 Land use (existing) and facilities (1) areas to be retained by military. The Marine Corps will provide a real estate boundary map to identify approximate areas to be sold and land to be retained by the Marine Corps. An additional "Retained Facilities Study" will be developed concurrent with reuse planning by the Marine Corps. This study will evaluate facility requirements and documentation to support any remaining population at MCAS, Tustin and include an analysis of recommended severance lines. Land uses recommended for the "Retained Area" shall be analyzed by Consultant in the EIR/EIS in addition to land use recommendations for the Reuse Area. 0 (2) land use inventory & densities; facility locations; conditions, age, structural design and seismic stability of buildings and structures, presence of asbestos, existing utilities and mechanical systems servicing buildings. The Marine Corps will provide a Facility Inventory Study which will be a detailed inventory of all MCAS buildings and structures (except family housing), including condition of assets and identification of major equipment to be salvaged by the military prior to property disposal. (3) surrounding community land uses 3.2.8 Utilities (age, condition, location, capacity) Input to this task from the Marine Corps will include existing utility maps and a utility study currently being prepared. The Utility Study will evaluate existing utility systems to determine capacity and logical points of severance/connection for those portions of MCAS, Tustin to be retained by the Marine Corps. The Marine Corps study will include recommendations for cost effective utility service to the Retained Area. The Marine Corps Facility Inventory will also include an inventory of the following utilities: (1) water supply (2) wastewater/sewage (3) electricity (4) gas (5) telephone (6) cable and other communications 3.2.9 Transportation/circulation (1) Regional and local setting surrounding base; existing and planned projects, current and anticipated deficiencies, review of adjoining city capital improvement programs, a complete traffic impact assessment of current background per Orange County Transportation Agency's Traffic Impact Assessment Methodology (2) On -base transportation systems Input to this task from the Marine Corps will include a "Circulation Study" which will evaluate traffic circulation in and around those portions of MCAS, Tustin to be retained by the Marine Corps, with input from local surrounding agencies and consideration of reuse 5 alternatives developed under this contract. Traffic impacts associated with reuse of "Retained Area" shall be analyzed by Consultant in the EIR/EIS along with Traff c Impacts of the "Reuse Area". (a) location (b) dimensions (c) existing access (d) existing physical condition (e) planned upgrades and improvements (f) paved pedestrian sidewalks (g) unpaved paths (h) bicycle paths (3) Public transportation serving site 3.2. 10 Helicopter Airfield This discussion shall be compiled by Consultant from information in the MCAS Tustin Master Plan. Discussion shall include: (1) Layout and dimensions (2) Clear zones/safety restrictions/approach flight paths (3) surfaces (4) Navigational Aids (NAVAIDS) (5) Aircraft parking areas (6) Fuel storage/distribution systems (7) Lighting (8) Existing avigation easements 3.2.11 Other Public Services (1) law enforcement (2) fire protection (3) schools (4) solid waste disposal (5) other 3.3 Consultant shall compile applicable Data Maps of project site and surroundings at presentation scale and report scale. 0 3.4 Much of the data collected in this phase can be updated and depicted on base maps by Consultant and in summary narrative form. 3.5 Products: An environmental setting report or reports suitable for incorporation into the EIR/EIS (10 screen copies, 25 copies, 1 reproducible to the City of Tustin; 10 screen copies and 15 final copies for Marine Corps) landuse and environmental field survey maps; base maps at presentation & report scale. 4.0 MARKET/DEMAND ANALYSIS 4.1 Consultant shall define market area subject to review by City 4.2 Consultant shall evaluate area economic trends Consultant shall examine regional and localized demographic and market trends. Specific areas of focus will include existing and projected population, housing, employment and unemployment, personal earnings and household income, retail sales, vacancy rates, general real estate conditions, etc. 4.3 Consultant shall analyze and forecast potential demand 4.3.1 Consultant shall complete a demand analysis of residential, commercial retail, office, industrial (light & research and development), tourist and other targeted markets that might offer development opportunities on the base closure site. 4.3.2 Consultant shall compile supply characteristics of major competitive projects within each targeted market and compare against demand information to determine implications. Annual sales volumes per square foot, vacancy rates, duration of vacancy, price range, and land and lease costs will help to provide an indication of the magnitude of unsatisfied market demand. It should be recognized in the analysis that the major demand for base facilities in the past often has come from companies or entrepreneurs outside of the local market area who want to enter new markets rapidly. Existing buildings and infrastructure at a surplus military site can be readily used to provide production and distribution facilities with little or no lead- time required for permitting, construction, and/or other start-up activities at the site. 9A Potential restrictions to land use options and marketability caused by existing contamination must be considered. 4.3.3 Based on the above economic base analysis, Consultant shall identify by land use type, volume, timing or schedule, price or lease range, quality and marketing requirements, the best economic development targets for the site; information such as the number of supportable acres for specific land uses or the number of housing units required at various pricing lands should be provided. 4.4 Product: Market Analysis report (10 screen copies; 50 final copies, 1 reproducible to the City of Tustin; 5 screen copies and 15 final copies for Marine Corps). 5.0 ISSUE IDENTIFICATION This component of the work program involves identification of issues, as well as opportunities and constraints. Activities under this task should be structured to serve as part of the EIR/EIS scoping process required under Section 10.0 of this Scope of Work. The Consultant will be asked to work closely with the Base Closure Task Force to assist in identifying issues based on background information collected. A community participation process shall also be initiated in this stage to assess planning concerns and priorities of surrounding communities for base disposal and reuse of the base. 5.1 Consultant shall undertake a preliminary issue identification 5.2 Consultant shall identify constraints and opportunities 5.3 Consultant shall undertake a community attitude survey and workshop 5.4 Product: 5.4.1 Presentation scale & report scale maps depicting opportunities and constraints. 5.4.2 Community attitude survey 5.4.3 Issues inventory in the form of a memorandum for inclusion into the Specific Plan document (10 screen copies, 25 final copies, 1 reproducible to the City of Tustin; 5 screen copies and 15 final copies for Marine Corps). F 5.4.4 Materials for presentation at public workshop 6.0 REUSE ALTERNATIVES 6.1 Consultant shall develop goals and objectives of base disposal and reuse based on participation and scoping of task force and results of community participation. Consideration will be given to federal government regulations (e.g. GSA screening) that may apply to property disposal options. 6.2 Consultant shall develop and review alternative land use and circulation plans based on participation and input of the task force and community participation results. 6.2.1 Consultant shall prepare at least three alternative land use and circulation concepts for base reuse. 6.2.2 Each alternative plan shall be an illustrative drawing depicting land uses, densities, urban circulation, along with support data stating design concepts, basic assumptions, phasing implications, open space concepts, etc. Impacts of each alternative on portions of MCAS, Tustin to be retained by military and facility modifications required to serve the "Retained Area" under each alternative, traffic, and key environmental categories/issues will be summarized. Each alternative will be evaluated against its economic feasibility and fulfillment of goals and priorities established for base disposal and reuse. 6.2.3 Consultant shall organize meeting of task force and community to introduce alternative plans and obtain public comment. 6.3 Consultant shall prepare refined concept plan based on task force direction and public review. 6.4 Product: Graphics and memorandum report as necessary to present refined alternative concepts (10 screen copies, 50 final copies, 1 reproducible to the City of Tustin, 10 screen copies and 15 final copies and one reproducible for Marine Corps to be billed to Marine Corps). 9 7.0 CO TY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 7.1 The primary focus of this task involves Consultant identifying the needed infrastructure and community facilities for the project. Each alternative will be tentatively examined for impact and cost of improvements. The intent is to identify the appropriate infrastructure systems necessary for each alternative plan and to evaluate the financial feasibility of each alternative plan. Facility modifications required to serve the "Retained Area" under each alternative shall be included in this analysis. 7. 1.1 Consultant shall identify all public improvements, responsible agencies, facilities and services, and yearly maintenance requirements for the reuse area. Consultant shall coordinate with Marine Corps consultant to develop compatible infrastructure plans for the "Reuse Area" and "Retained Area". a. Prepare conceptual water and sewer service plans identifying servicing agencies, location and sizing of the backbone facilities and recognition of any phasing needs. b. Prepare a conceptual drainage plan for addressing the location, sizing and type of facilities serving the planning area considering the impacts on land use and cost implications of implementation in either a phased manner or in a single step. C. Prepare conceptual alignments for any extension of arterial or secondary roadways within the planning area including relationship of base to Eastern corridor alignment. d. Evaluate development phasing opportunities and constraints within the context of infrastructure. e. Evaluate opportunities for incorporating a retarding basin in open space/golf course. 7.1.2 Consultant shall prepare preliminary cost estimates for each improvement or facility. 10 7.2 Community facilities and improvements data will be refined by Consultant for the preferred land use alternative plan. Recommendations by Consultant will be made to provide the needed facilities with the optimum level of design efficiency. 7.2.1 Consultant shall further refine of public improvements and facilities based on the preferred alternative, including conceptual circulation, drainage, water and sewer plans which indicate the location and size of major facilities. 7.2.2 Consultant shall prepare cost estimates for each improvement or facility. 7.2.3 Consultant shall develop phasing criteria to ensure a balance between development and public improvements. Consideration of parcel availability pending environmental clean-up should be incorporated into phasing criteria. 7.3 Product: 10 screen copies of a technical memorandum, 25 draft copies, 50 final copies, (one reproducible to City of Tustin; 10 screen copies, 15 draft and 15 final copies required for Marine Corps). Report information will also be used in Fiscal Impact Report. _a. 8.0 FISCAL IlVIPACT AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS REPORT 8.1 Consultant shall construct a detailed computer based fiscal model to analyze the projected City costs and revenues associated with at least three reuse (land use) alternatives for the base. The purpose of the analysis is to ensure that the preferred land use plan will generate adequate revenues to cover any estimated expenditures, both at build -out and as development takes place. Revenues shall be shown by major category, capital expenditures, and in expenditures by functional category, the next fiscal balance and the discounted net present value of the fiscal balance. In the case of fiscal deficits, mitigation measures will be recommended. 8.2 Consultant shall develop a set of detailed financing options for any infrastructure requirements necessary to set the stage for development. Alternative sets of financing mechanisms and alternative ways to spread the financial burden should be tested by Consultant. Alternative financing options should be tested against a range of assumptions regarding the phasing of development, including type, timing, and extent of development. 11 8.3 Product 8.3.1 Fiscal Impact Program & Report (10 screen copies, 50 final copies, 1 reproducible to City of Tustin; 5 final copies for Marine Corps) . 8.3.2 Financing Plan (10 screen copies, 50 final copies, 1 reproducible to City of Tustin; 5 final copies for Marine Corps). 8.3.3 User Guide & Training to automated Fiscal Model to run a City computer system (user guide - 5 screen copies, 25 final copies, 1 reproducible, training session for 10 employees and original computer disc in PC format, IBM compatible.) 9.0 SPECIFIC PLAN PREPARATION 9.1 Consultant shall develop a specific plan in accordance with provisions of Section 65450 of the Government Code based on the preferred alternative. The Plan shall at minimum include: 9.1.1 A land use master plan 9.1.2 Urban design plan & design guidelines 9.1.3 A circulation concept plan 9.1.4 A drainage concept plan 9.1.5 Water and sewer concept plan 9.1.6 Landscape concept plan 9.1.7 Phasing concept plan 9.1.8 Land use and development standards 9.1.9 Implementation and Plan Administration 12 9.2 Product 9.2.1 A' specific plan suitable for adoption. Presentation scale maps depicting concept plans, as needed for public hearings. 9.2.2 An executive copy of plan (10 screen copies, 25 draft copies, 50 final copies, 1 reproducible to City of Tustin; 10 draft and 15 final copies for Marine Corps). 9.2.3 A 35 mm slide show which illustrates planning process and summarizes plan. An IBM compatible word processing disk containing the final plan report; format to be on word perfect version 5.0. 10.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL EMPACT STATEMENT ON SPECIFIC PLAN/BASE DISPOSAL AND REUSE AND RELATED PROTECTS PLAN 10.1 Consultant shall prepare Initial Study for EIR/EIS and Notice of Preparation Consultant shall prepare, publish and distribute the Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS/EIR (note that all notices and correspondence prepared shall be approved by the City of Tustin and Marine Corps and released or authorized for release by the City of Tustin and Marine Corps). The EIR/EIS shall be prepared in accordance with CEQ Regulations (40CFR Parts 1502-1508) format also incorporating all requirements of CEQA. 10.2 Data Collection 10.2.1 Consultant shall review data collected during background analysis including existing and planned adjacent land uses, socio- economic/demographic characteristics of the project vicinity and city policies. Some additional analysis may be required. 10.2.2 Consultant shall review existing general plan elements and zoning ordinance to identify goals or policies as they relate to the project and determine compatibility and consistency issues and necessary general plan amendments. 13 10.3 EIR/EIS Scoping Process 10.3.1 The Scoping Process shall be incorporated by Consultant into the community participation process outlined in Section 5.0 and 11.0 of this Scope of Work. 10.3.2 Consultant shall prepare all scoping letters, announcements, presentations and distribution lists and coordinate all aspects of public scoping meetings. 10.4 Document Preparation Consultant's document preparation shall follow the format established by 40 CFR Part 1502 and shall include the following specific sections: 10.4.1 Prepare an introduction and summary section 10.4.2 Prepare project description, purpose and need 10.4.3 Prepare existing environmental setting discussion 10.4.4 Document impacts and recommend mitigation -measures Additional significant traffic analysis of the project and each alternative will be necessary by Consultant. Again the level of detail required will be methodology promulgated by the OCTA for Traffic Impact Assessments. At minimum, it is expected that City of Tustin, Irvine and Santa Ana traffic analysis projection will be necessary, daily and peak hour travel demands as well as ADT traffic volumes for identified roadway links and intersections.- capacity ntersections;capacity deficiencies and changes necessary to Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways; the impacts of the project (both "Retained Area" and "Reuse Area") and alternative land use and circulation concepts and the impacts of phasing; recommended mitigation measures to ensure roadways can handle future traffic volumes; development of criteria for phasing mitigation measures; determination of estimated costs and funding sources for recommended mitigation measures. Consultant shall prepare a mitigation monitoring plan. IV Required documentation and consultation by Consultant with the State Office of Historical Preservation will be required for any historical structures proposed to be removed, altered or affected in conjunction with base reuse decisions or plan. 10.4.5 The disposal and reuse alternatives developed by Consultant in the Specific Plan preparation process will meet the requirements of CEQA and NEPA for alternatives to the project. The no action/no project alternative shall also be included. 10.4.6 Consultant shall prepare any other required sections of EIR/EIS either required by CEQA or NEPA, as may be applicable. 10.4.7 Consultant shall complete all public notices (i.e. Notice of Preparation, Notice of Intent, Notice of Completion and Record of Decision) 10.4.8 Consultant shall prepare any necessary Planning Commission and City Council resolutions for certification of environmental documents with findings of overriding consideration 10.5 Product: Screencheck draft EIR/EIS, (10 copies to City of Tustin; 25 copies for Marine Corps), Draft (75 copies to City plus one reproducible; 30 copies to Marine Corps plus one reproducible) . Screencheck final EIR/EIS and draft Record of Decision (10 copies to City; 25 copies to Marine Corps), Final EIR/EIS (75 copies to City of Tustin plus one reproducible; 100 copies to Marine Corps plus one reproducible), Notices and Resolutions; List of Agencies to receive notices and Draft EIR/EIS. Marine Corps will assist in preparation of distribution list to avoid duplication between City and Marine Corps distribution requirements. Note that revisions to final EIR/EIS may be required by Consultant prior to publishing Record of Decision to respond to public comments during the final notice period. 15 11.0 COMIIIMTY PARTICIPATION 11.1.1 In conjunction with previous tasks, Consultant shall conduct a series of public workshops to obtain public comments on the status and progress of the base disposal and reuse planning process. The number, location and format shall be mutually agreed upon with the City. However, at minimum, it is expected that at least four workshops will be necessary. 11.1.2 Consultant, when directed by the City, shall contact State, Federal, County and adjacent cities to determine interests in public benefit uses on the site. 11.1.3 Consultant shall prepare any necessary handouts for distribution to the public at public workshops. 11.1.4 Consultant shall attend all Planning Commission and City Council hearings on the Base Reuse Plan (at minimum, two hearings before each body are anticipated). 11.1.5 Product: Memorandum summary of results of all community interactions (copies sufficient for distribution to participating parties) . CAS:kbc\mcas.4 16 EXHIBIT "B" CONSULTANTSI PROPOSAL MARINE CORPS AIR STATION PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR BASE DISPOSAL AND REUSE s HNTB FEE PROPOSAL AUGUST 25, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL i B. FEE PROPOSAL i 1. OVERALL FEE PROPOSAL BY SCOPE 2. COMPOSITE HOURS BY PRIME/SUB r 3. SCHEDULE OF RATES C. SCHEDULE 1. Reuse PLANNING/MEETINGS D. SCOPE OF WORK MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING JULY 212 1992 E. PROJECT TEAM 1. INTRODUCTION 2. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART 3. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES 4. BIOGRAPHIES OF KEY STAFF 1 [!�Jz k d =I HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN & BERGENDOFF ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS August 25, 1992 Ms. Christine Shingleton Assistant City Manager 15222 Del Amo Avenue Tustin, CA 92860 Dear Ms. Shingleton, I Exec -hive 01—t -le Isrvile I90 Irrdrrr, (,irliJfrrrriu 92-1.1 ('1'i) –52-64) 10 We are pleased to submit to the City of Tustin and MCAS Tustin, HNTB's revised Fee Proposal for the Reuse plan/Specific Plan and Environmental Report for the re -use of the Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin, California. Based upon our negotiation session August 11, 1992, we have revised our May 18th Draft Proposal at your direction. Associated with HNTB on the project are The Planning Center, (TPC); Cotton Beland Associates, Inc (CBA); Economic Research Associate (ERA); Austin Foust (A/F) and Thirtieth Street Architects. HNTB also proposes to maintain an advisory group of experts in specific area of military base re -use who will assist at key points in the project; Mr. William Laubernds, and Mr. Wilbur Baumann. HNTB is committed to providing the necessary resources to successfully gain approvals for the Reuse study. We will be available to answer any questions and assist the City and MCAS Tustin in execution of our proposal. Sincerely, HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN & BERGENDOFF Ronald L. Hartje, \,P. . � Partner I RGW/gaw re-uplan.1 Ronald G. Wortman Project Manager Psrtners .-nar.es 7 i,er,n.na, F.E. Oa— J S' -,.pa, Pr. J:.;•. _ .:ct :... Pc. f.c::er': S :..c•":, PE. .�; �� _. .. �_..� N_. �= . _. -.. c ... ... Co^)' � �OCJ.'T,a.^, LIA. vOr.^.Cn M S.:ane\...^ PE. HOrvC', K Ht, ..i^,en^..�� �E.�.IP.O''c ._. ,J.J._�, -.: VE JtV• .., l'. L'\'r_]^:.. _ :.,- -. - � �._-... :. -. L _', [_-. ,- _ .. Doug. ac E Pref..cctt PE, R„•,u'c L r".l^tie PE.'-+ JrrO",E• B. ue^ or Assoerstes Ken: a' T. ��-,coy.. 'PL Roo«• -t„ V: 5•'�,; �. PE. r;:., _. C _.rse PE. ..�. ;c^ S• a .e PG. r= ,r .cur E;--- 1181= ;, _ r _ . _ c - •-• Bernarc L -rr"ce PE. Steone^^© Oumn PE. Sam �..._c^s F'E _\. N �� :,e^ -Ai:_.. �:c :.�_ h', oE...: n _ r:.. ... "nomas L W,I;,a^,s AIA. Jen" E Kt.t`- eE Rr.cne\ P er c; PE. S:.ever. V Parse Po:;r^:L, Le -7.. c`r C;.�--� � �;, .... ._. cE Peder S_ A,st,•, Pc. Jen, O Erotners PE. C,,a-es D=e.. -E. Rocert ��'. S ez.-. P� Dc..^ :,c .. 3.•, Pr -I G. Ya -obs, PE, F. Cnr,stoc"er D,^`.c nc ASL... G1�7PV. c-E..,,.r^ AIL. .:a^,r.� n,F •,e A': - - f .. �.... �. _ _ ..,,.. -. Pc=elt L. Vlatso^ GIA. J3, P P,l._ PE. Va-n-`r Offiess.-c- _^,a. .'L c^ J a x a. W W LL m VI T CO CD [t' q' qt O O CD O (D r N r- rn a M M N m L!) O N LO tt CD N O M r O It M In (- M N *— LA O J T io r T T co ka O O O t` O w M O O m m CC) It O N T O N O N N O 'c' lt t` Ltd O M M r M CD r O m N M T T M CO T CO It M M M r cl W T En W a X W Lnr CD O 00 r '9d- O 'fit' r O CD CD a)O N CD r r CD M Tt r N CY) t` Ln N N Cl) CD [t' M T— O CD Ln r N 00 CD N N O O N Lo M r r O T Cl) CO Ln CO OLO T T T 6s MOM W g 0 U Cn I F- C � C Cl)I U p c!� U C C13 �_ N C a) �U ll (TS cu L C C Q a O o Q Q c E �- U cr)_ CU '—` �C 1 CU E CZU U E Cv > O U L- CB > N > CU © N N Q O O� m Ln oC U U- cn W U O O O O O O O O O O O r N M I 4 I Ln I CD I t-� CC) I 6 L O r - T- r m Q O O a LU LU U- p ON J Q cD T O CD O CD N M (D T O f O CD N d' � O O CJJ t,- O N N M CD N �- O CD C") O to r N CO CD N N O O N m CD M O M *- O M M M O T t1) lt7 It O T T T T rco O Q LO O O O O O O O O O In m T Ln O O M M c) C 7 O) M O C") LO O CO M CD m O CO •- Ln O V O O W T T O) N T T T LO N T T T A w O = 00 � O OY O O M O NN C\l LO N T M U- O O O O O O O O O 0 O LO O 0) O COD D O C O U o� �(D o� o LO LO o O. LO LO N N CD c? O CM CD l CT .17 Lfi Q m O O O N LO � O CO O qc?• O CO O t' O O ti Ln N O CD O O O O O CO M ti tt t` 0 co O O O O M O N O In Ln lid" N CD r) M 00 O In N N Ln T T .:. CO u JW / Co� CO T �' O CD W It O ��1 CD O may. N O 00 t� CO T Ln ,�^t Ln O ♦O 0 Ln co LO d' = T M CD CO M cY O N C) (v 00 T co rz Cn W O pi U- CO UJ N W o cts c cn •>• cn (D U C ct� �_ O I-- U to Q ca co cB C) > := c� 'U W tZ N to co cz U- cz O 0- >• C -O fl Q C Q C) C U (l -E C (n C cz U ''' O cv cn a� 0 4- a o O O O O O o 0 O O O O T N C7 4 Ln CD r CO O O T T T ON oQo cr Ln s P,CDT Ln $ to w v o slj�-Ioo (nn Go 40 Iviol cn Co in Ln cs COco O 1Y101 o m m o o o O o o NOUVdI011L'dd N n... v 0 Q g. �> aOD co U C N o uj Slshil3 N . N . Z - LLNYld N if CND co im" V Com) fes) CNi. U ti oAn OU103ds u. z U O amw ui O. Q ` Co Cn O N O O O O O � O 33NVNl3 . f7 . Z /lOddWl IVOSid z � � w r- _ 31MLOnHISYL4+ N1 o -T N N 8 � U im ' SMnIOdd, - � Lu 0 _ ulNnwwoo ` � Q, U' �/ •. O O CO N t, CO LD -W 1A co .� O s z O Qi SBALLMS211d `° N 1 t7 �w qac o � C) C� o 0 CD� �D m - o . ZQ Z S3nsslcc � e .~1 w W cn Z s3nssi O � o;O N O O O O O Cl) � tD � .. O m .., Z C� !3NUM O `Z 1'' I 1 tD O co CJ o O I o o Cl U) cD o co co ►i ' r�011tizlrroO�IC OO I N I CD coCD N i O O O O O tD t�D z , = o Q� 0 0 0 0 0 o� tn N N Ln i 103r0l�d 7VLJ3Ao J I Ln cli LnLn CD I Ln Ln Ln ... y J N Q) n O Ln Cl) Cl) S3I �� 1°t�ill8 m IL i > Q„ w C w w LJ Z p LL: LLJv J a Z w a w a J v U ¢ Cl) iLij J C U U z Z U Z G U w U J U 0 w g z U c ►- o m W5 cn75 m < a a c� 0 so cry W F— V O N t� z J W m Z O F— F— C) V J V) O d O W W LL C� 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o C� o o d S-Ynoo P 10 f�O P In O P O P O O N It O M00 %0 P Co In �- O O �O c O o: .:.0 In N N in r N Co .t N O M ti O O �p 0` O N O �O N M N O $dnOH lylol `M `� C) •o .r p p uhrnwv�oo: :. ...:.;. :.. O O O O Irl C) co f� O O ':>: /�; :;:;i: O r� O N co O NYId DIJD?dS o N co 0 :o::>:: '::o: BONYNid lloyc YI IYOSIJ. 32rn17f1" $wJNI. O N co IX O : `'•::0: ::: f ;i Q uLvnrrwtr�: o o S'?NI'YNN311Y No: ::��> • 3Sr13t3 :i!u: CD 0 W Y N M cr <a: a s�nssi:: ...:: i :te.: .... o N �o q z i s3nSSl La F: i3hL' dY i .... O co N �T ti O � O O O 'O ;:::r1::::::::: O Its: M P �O P M to M In In :;: >�T;;>::: O +t ..... SISnIYNy r r 1.0 `.;: :X: :::: ::.:.:..: CNnoLO>jya v NOIl c!KyJ'r0 N t� nt I!A .:. i -. O N 1�3Yi39YA^rri _-)=rO6d �1YL'=AO s M: .: In In In In O O O O O . $?lt�ci �19b Illo O Pr- v co co q ►n I M U U U O v, cn i d' N N W W G G C7 Q W Z W W C p N Z O W Z ►- z a ix G u cn `>: ::::>: O G w a S z Z .:.>s G;:::?::'> u to > O z G Z w G w:ib:;© w ::•r - p w w w O O w cc cc L11 Z • U LUZ Z a Ul 2 F - Q O 0 W :- ni z O t= a U tl. O O H cc O m O U CL U) ujF- Z ccLU J w M cn Cn N p o On � O opQ O ^ cn C) N M lD O O lb v 8 M d l� G S�YTl00 • M 1Y101 M o sanou S 1`:101 M rn " m Q O m O N NOtiddl0li d r' � N c� khyloo 0 0 0 o SI3/t13 o Mild cN-> ... �I�J3dS .:)NYNIA O m O O O C' 11.7�'dwt lt'�St3, 0 <o 0C! 0 s3unndj :: l- :uivnwwo� m CD cli co co "' _o . cs Y 0 4 3sn_� Q .. fl coCD O N W in Ln aD th.; ;>Lri Z.:. S3f1SSl .if . . '- _w 0 o; o 01 S3nSSI 0 t i O c I N O O O CID i O N cl, I I I v g I 1r:.n3��n^rrc o -- I 0 ��_ro5a I j I c�l� ?.ln`r 'illi I CV N I b I Ln Ln M O O cr; ~ Z J C J Vi J Q 0 W W d 0 LIJU w Q Z w Z = V J F— �: J Z C O Z Z S S W 0: u' <n W CL (.n (L co o a. E- c: U 2- c=n S o u g N I <":>:::::1::":� N o N U'> C7 N N CO co - Co cli g savnoo 1Y101 sunoH 0 lylol lL NouddiOUbYd 0 0 ui�rnwwo� 0 0 r- siel3• < ~ W w W U U Q'.••.. 0 O NYId of 31103ds 0 ao w F= 30NYN13 /lordNi ly'osld, 0 < IZ IZ d S w z fn W2C!l:::.:3::: Ci J o W c� >:= ste =1; sm nnvd xlwnrmoo X"M"."� Cn :>als:�: SBNIYNValY Y - 3s13tf :? cn a<> s_nssi 0 ssnssl L=?i�fb 1N E. _ o .� S1S MN`: Cls N011vZ1ti^: �d0 ' i i17�f Abd I 0 ..' .. i:d3ro c MY' ......... `. S.i Y G 31C i 1110 0 '- N I <":>:::::1::":� N o N U'> C7 N N CO co - Co cli g .v N lL h- < ~ W w W U U Q'.••.. O C3 w F= < Q 0 < IZ IZ d S w z fn W2C!l:::.:3::: Ci J W .v N F - w w s F- s F - w cr: s H J Q O CL O s 0- w w LL C) w U cc D O U) LU s J Q s D J D U _U E O s z _O F— L) O � J as U = cn �w Q w wV CQ U� O Z O U w J Q O CL O LL) w LL $o 3. SCHEDULE OF RATES PR{MEiSUB-CONSULTANTS ♦ (HNTB) Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff HOURLY RATE ♦ (ERA) Economic Research Associates HOURLY RATE Ronald Hartje 125 David Wilcox 125 Ronald Wortman 95 Mike Wright 100 Kathryn Gray 90 Diane O'Brien 100 Paul Jensen 88 Cynthia James 75 Bob Smith 69 ♦ (CBA) Cotton/Beland/Associates Steve Rinnert 80 Donald A. Cotton 105 William Wilkie 96 John E. Bridges 95 John Brothers 125 Raymond J. Pendilo I 80 William Hughes 95 Irene Finklestein 65 Steve Owens 50 Kimberly Cole 55 ♦ (AP) Advisory Panel ♦ (TSA) Thirtieth Street Associates William Laubernds 125 John Loomis 100 Wilbur Baumann 150 Jim Wilson 100 ♦ (TPC) The Planning Center Chip Gulley 60 Al Bell 125 ♦ John Minch And Associates, Inc. Karen Gulley 55 Thomas Leslie 125 Don Arabula 80 John Minch 125 Randy Jackson 125 Robert White 75 ♦ (AF) Austin -Foust Gary Hurd 75 Terence W. Austin Phong Le Krys Saldivar 110 65 I 65 ♦ Tierra Madre Consultants, Inc. Jack Easton Stephen Myers ♦ Leighton And Associates, Inc. �I 80 55 Eldon Gath 110 Mehrdad Mandyiar 92 Garry Kepes Chester Burrows Don Terres 85 62 82 11 C. SCHEDULE HNTB's fee proposal is based on a projected 18 -month time schedule. All tasks included in the Scope of Work will be completed in 18 months from the NOTICE TO PROCEED. 12 MEMORY NDUM OS U2:DERST :LADING CONCERNING A JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL IXPACT STATEMENT/ EN-VIR01;XENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND A REUSE SPECY7 IC 13LAN OR F..ARI1TE CORPS AIR STATION, TUSTIN This Memoranduri of Understanding (MOU) is entered into by and between the City of Tustin ("City") and the United Statcs of America by and through the Con--nander, Marine Corps Air Bases, Western Area (,,usm ,) respecting the following matters. RMCITALS A. Pursuant to Public Law 101-510, the Defense Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Marine Corps Air Station Tustin will be closed no later than July 1997. B. The USMC intends to dispose of a substantial portion of the real property that now. constitutes the Air Station while retaining other portions to support Marine Corps Air Station El Toro. For purposes of this agreement 'Air Station" shall mean Marine Corps Air Station Tustin encompassing the existing boundaries of that installation; "Reuse Area" shall mean those areas of the Air Station planned for disposal by the USMC; and "Retained Area" shall Prean those areas of tha *Air' Station to be retained for continued use by the USMC after closure. C. The City and USMC desire to meet their respective obligations under California and Federal law to assess the potential environmental ibpacts of disposal, reuse, and retention of various portions of the Air Station by preparing a joint T'nvironmen.Za1 i:.lpac ;- Report/Environmental . I:zoact Statement (EIR/=S) . This coonerative effort is consistent with the Department of Defense strategy for disposal of base closure property and will nromcte i n tercovernmental coordination at- the local and federal levels. D. For the purposes of the EIR/EIS, "project" shall mean the LYSMC' s disposal of the Reuse Area and continued use of t_ne Retained "Pea of ter closing the Ai?' Station and the City's preparation and a c C cf a Specific Pla_i nor the R E u se ?y=ea. he City and USMC believe that the City's pr ena = a tion and adoption cf a Specific Plan for the Reuse Area at the same time that both parties produce a joint EIR/EIS will op ti P1iZe •the value of t2 -,Le Reuse Area and assist the City in a� timely economic adjust-men t to the Air S to tion' s closure . '^':e Ci C,y and USi C wish to ensure pr eparat i o:: cf an ..IR/EIS fc 1 • . " the disposal and reuse o= the r.ir Station that includes all relevant i r.forr.,ati on and analysis before independently acting on the Project. r G. The Irrational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) , its implementing regulations, and Article 14 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) permit and encourage joint Federal and state processes for environmental compliance to reduce duplication of effort, expense, and pape-rwork whenever possible. Council on Environmental Quality regulations, 40 C.F.R. Section 1506.2, and CEQA Guidelines, Section 15226, provide for joint federal and state planning processes, environmental research and studies, public hearings, and environmental assessment. Those regulations also provide that in such cases, Federal agencies and State or local agencies shall be joint lead agencies for purposes of a joint EIR/EIS. H. The City, with the cooperation of"! the USMC, has requested approval of a $750,000 grant from the Department of Defense Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA) %_ support preparation of a joint EIR/v'IS for the Project with the expectation that with USMC consultation and participation, _the resulting study will satisfy EIS requirements of NEPA, and applicable •Federal, Department of Navy'and United States Marine -Corps regulations and directives; enhance redevelopment opportunities for the Reuse Area; and eventually maximize revenue into the Base Closure Account. I. The City has agreed to undertake the preparation of the joint EIrR/EIS and Specific Plan for the Reuse Area within an expedited tiraeframe with the understanding that the environmental evaluation of the Project will cost approximately $800,000 and that approval of a $750,000 grant recrsest from the OEA is anticipated. J. A USMC representative participated in the screening process for selecting a consultant to' prepare- w^_e EIR/EIS for the Pro j ec-C and deter -mined �.�r1G t }�-.. all i the finalists from which the City will � select a contract consultant are quali-fied under federal standards. MUTUAL UNDERSTA2MINGS NOW, Ti=E : ORE, in considers tion of these recitals an%d other COn51de�zt10n S hereinSeg. forth, v 45 «utua l'J unaers Cod �lwt 1 :. 'oi:�t %r -.R/ --TS shall be prepared on -z-he Project in accordance . r_ h NEPA zn c CEQA and all a^plicabie : ederzi , Depart.;,ert o� Navy and United States Marine Corps reculat_ons and directives. T e Scope of Wor}: is attached as Exhibit "A" . 2. The City and the USMC shall be joint lead agencies, as providea for in 40 C.F.R. Section 1501.5(b) and Section 15226 Of the CEQh Guidelines. they shall endeavor in good faith to concur in a pre=erred reuse alternative which) will (a) be., connatible with the USMC's use cf the eta!ned Area, (b) not nterfere with any environ -a! �renediaticn which the USMC iS recuired to acco:;tiplish, and (c) provide timely ecc::o:,�i c adj us tent fol the City. 2 3. To the maxi=mum extent practicable under existing laws and regulations, both parties agree to share relevant information. As input to the EIR/EIS and planning for the Specific Plan for the Reuse Area, the USMC shall rake reasonable efforts to provide in a timely :,fanner information identified to be provided by the USMC in Exhibit A. 4. PROJECT REPRESENTATIVES AND THEIR DUTY_, A. In the preparation of the EIR/F.IS, the City and the USMC shall be represented by the following project representatives or officers referred to as -the "Project Cc=it tee" Christine Shingleton Assistant City Manager 15222 Del Amo Avenue Tustin, CA 92680 (714) _544-8890 X 253 Dana Ogdon Senior Planner 15222 Del Amo Avenue Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 544-8890 X 291 Ann Dotson Urban Planner MCAS E1 Toro (AQ) Santa Ana, CA 92709 (714-) 726-3202 Linda Howard Deputy Staff Civil Engineer MCAS E1 Toro (JA) Santa Ana, CAS 92709 (714) 726-6608_ B. The successful prebaraticn of the joint EIR/SIS will rec_uire full cor=unicati.on between the parties. It shall be the duty of the Project Cor"mittee. to ensure close consultation throughout the document preparation and review process. Me-zbers of the Project Co.: -;,i ttee shall kee-o each other advised of developments affecting the prenarati on of the EIR/.EIS . Meetings cf the Project Co^..n_ttee shall be held as needed to ensure close consultations including discussion of issues raised by any Federal, State, regional cr local agency and the aonroach to resolving these issues. C. Both tiaz-ties recognize the benef;ts of retaining the me::.ber s named above on the Project Co—ittee.; nevertheless, each party reserves the right to replace its members as needed. The City and USMC shall provide each c -her written notificzt lon of subs t tL' to members with their titles, addresses, and telephone numbers D. The Project Conmittee shall review and agree on the follow4^.g : 3 1) Detailed work tasks and scheduling for the project to ensure consistency with Exhibit A and to ensure that the requirements of' Federal and State law are met and that the statutory findings required of the City and USMC for their respective decisions on the Project can be made; and 2) Whether the work performed is satisfactory and if not, how best to correct the deficiencies in the work; and 3) The division of responsibilities between the City and USMC. 4) Guidance and information provided to the Contractor necessary for work performed under the scope -of work. All review comments and response to comments received shall be reviewed and atiproved by the Project Committee- prior to being ac ted on by the Contractor. 5. CONSULTANT CONTRACT A. The City and the USMC shall jointly select the contractor and the City shall be responsible for entering into a contract with the selected consultant (the Contractor) and administering the preparation of the EIR/EIS for the Project. B. Pursuant to 40 C.F.?. Section ?506.5(e), the City shall resuire the Contractor to execute a disclosure stztenen _, in+ a form approved by the USMC, specifying tinct the Contractor has no financial or other interest in the outcome of the Project. C. In the event that to tai costs `cr the Project i6en `-if-,ed by Ex.�nibit A e: : c e e d $800, 000, the City and, the USMC w:i? 1 cooperate in good Faith in an effort. to identify additional funding sources that might be available to reit-,burse the City for anv es;pe^.sea incurred in excess of $0 00 , 000. In any event, the USMC tinder s tants that t::e City shall have no oblicaticns tinder th is agreement if an OEr gr ant- is not- awarded in the zmoun t of a t least $750,000. 6. T7ME LIMITS AND SC; �DliLEs A. Pursuant to Section 15110 -of of C ---:'QA Guidelines, the City and USMC agree to waive the one year mime limit. for completing and certifying a ' firm EIE/EIS. 4 B. The City and USMC shall make reasonable e f for is to comply with an 18 month schedule for completing the EIR/EIS as identified in Exhibit A, or to ccmnlete it as soon as practical thereafter. The City and USMC will mutually identify all applicable actions and procedures necessary to neet this schedule and delineate all divisions of responsibilities. In order to meet the 18 month schedule, the USMC shall provide and co., plete as soon as reasonably possible, Marine Corps studies and work to be used in development of the EIR/EIS and Specific Plan for the Reuse Area, as identified in Exhibit A. 7. In order to obtain co,.=ents front all public agencies and from the general public on 'he draft EIR/EIS, the City and the USMC shall jointly conduct scoti_ing meetings and public hearings on the EIR/EIS, when it is feasible to do so. In any event, each party shall be free to satisfy its own requirements for public disclosure separately as deemed necessary. s. n the event of disputes as to scientific issues relating to the FIR/ .--IS,, the EIR/yIS shall contain conflicting viewpoints. 9. In the event of disputes concerning' mitigation measures the EIR/EIS. shall identify the full range of measures under consideration. 10. ASS ESSMENT/C ERTIF!CATION OF COMPLEFITENESS OF FINAL EI'R/EIS . The City and USMC shall independently assess and certify the adequacy and completeness of the final EIR/EIS. 11. _C: -]QA CERTIFICATION. Upon independent . cert' fica tion of the final EIR/E_S, notification shall be made by the City, Pursuant to CEQA. 12. COORD NA.^TON OF Dr C T S 0NT . Cons is tent with the parties' agreement (as set fcrth in paragraph number 2 above) to make a good - faith effort to concur i n a preferred reuse alternative for the Reuse Area, the City and the USMC shall coord=nate their respective fr;nal decisions under CyQA and t EPA -o ensure consistency. ' N:,PA RECORD OE DFCTs QN. Pursuant to appllcalDle federal laws z.^.d recu? ztior.s, after the US:'C and t'tze Secretary of the Navv have aporoved the ' i nal EIS and the Environ: cental Pro tectipn Agency has of f ec ted public'. -tion of t -he notice, the Secretary of the Navy will make a recision on the USMC actions related to the Project and a Record of Decision will be published. COO?DTNam. n WT z'u N P_; - AND CE2,L. The City and usmC Shall be free t0 fulfill tale== statui..ory responsibilities, including pe=A.LLi t issuance, in acccrdance r wi th Cr,Qh and NEPA 5 recuirements or other applicable statutes. 15. MOLT OgGAN ZATIQN. The various headings and numbers herein, the grouping of provisions of this 2;OU into separate sections and paragraphs, and the organization hereof, are for.ccnvenience only and shall not be considered otherwise. 16. a.T.MTTA' 10112 �kND r?` NDMF1.jTs A. Any modification of this. MOU :,+ust be in writing and properly executed by both parties. B. This MOU may be amended by either party upon consent, in writing, of both parties to this MOU. C. The City and USMC shall take whatever further steps they deem necessary, including further MOU's or amendments to this MOU, in order to fulfill the purpose of this MOU. D. Each provision of this MOU is subject to the laws of the United States and the delegated authority in each instance. 17. APPROVAL Each party signing this MOU expressly warrants and represents that the person signing this MOU on its behalf has the authority to execute this MOU. IN WITNESS -9EERE0F, the parties hereto have caused this MOU to be duly executed on the respective dates set forth opposite their sianat-ores . CITY: CITY OF TUSTIN i By William A. Euston �-s �� u. AuEust 6 1.992 Imo., C �� .ana�er ✓awe c • R v ✓ ' ✓tom'✓, r w1 ~ Ch istine A. Shing �" a Its Assistant City Mianaget Dated: 11-192 (Sianztures continued o:i following page) U9 aG: UNITED STATES ?MARINE CORPS By: Dated: , 1992 P. D. WILLIAMS Major General, United States Marine Corps Commander, Marine Corps Air Base , Western. Area Atinroved as . to form: James . Rourke City Attorney City of Tustin Ronald G. ries s Counsel to the Co-imn. ander Marine Corps Air Bases, Western Area 7 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK 7/21/92 EX=1T T A MARINE CORPS AIR STATION TUSTIN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES POR BASE DISPOSAL AND REUSE SCOPE OF 'CORK 1.0 OVERALL PROJECT MANAGEMENT The City requires that all necessary planning and environmental services for the Base Disposal and Reuse Scope of Work be completed within eighteen (18) months. The consultant wi1i, therefore, be responsible for assuming a complete project coordinator/manager role. This, at minimum, will include the following: ' 1.1 Designate project manager and assemble the consultant team and administer all sub -consultant contracts for professional 'services, special .studies and reports needed to support the necessary planning and environmental services for Base Disposal and Reuse. 1.2 Direct and supervise efforts of the consultant team through all aspects of the project. Evaluate all draft program documents from sub -consultants prior to release to City. Monitor team performance in completing tasks on schedule and apprise the City of team progress at monthly intervals. I.3 Facilitate on-going correspondence between the consultant team and key project participants, including City staff, the Marine Corps, the Steering Committee, the Base Closure Task Force and other affected agencies and parties of interest. 1.4 Participate in meetings with City and Marine Corps representatives, outside agencies, Base Closure Task Force meetings and public workshops throughout the Project, as well as Planning Commission and City Council Public Hearings, and meetings necessary for exchange of information, resolution of decisions and review of project's progress. 1.5 Coordinate and expedite the flow of information between City departments, consultants, the Marine Corps and other agencies. 1.6 Maintain a master schedule, budget Gnd cost- control system which identifies L major activities for the project, time and money expended and actual and budgeted 1 costs. Such schedule and cost information shall be tracked using a computerized management system. At a minimum, a monthly update of a critical path method (cpm) timeline for all project deliverables shall be completed, including for public notices and meetings. The schedule shall accommodate an eighteen (18) month completion schedule (target date for publishing a Record of Decision) and allow for a thirty (30) day government review of all document submittals. Public review periods mandated by CEQA and NEPA shall also be accommodated in the schedule. Consultant will be responsible for review of project's progress against the master schedule, informing the City and Marine Corps of variances from the schedule and recommending and implementing corrective actions including alternatives to keep project on -schedule. 1.7 Prepare and distribute copies of a monthly executive report outlining overall project status in terms of schedule, budget and team performance. 1.8 Review conferences shall be held after each document submittal to discuss comments received. 1.9 Entry onto military installations is a privilege granted by the commanding officer of the activity. Conditions of access and security must be adhered to by the consultant at all times. Permission for entry onto the project site must be coordinated with the Marine Corps. The Consultant may be required to subordinate their schedule to the military's schedule of operations in the project area. 1..10 Products: letters, meeting summaries, project schediles, flow charts, program and monthly statements of services, reports to task reports, general memoranda, force, steering committee, Planning Commssion and City Council meetings. 2.0 PROTECT ORZATION This initial effort involves bringing all members of the consultant team together, including personnel from the City and Marine Corps for project oricntation and refinement of the work program. Project orientadon will include, at a minimum: field visits to the project site and surrounding communities by the project team and meetings with personnel from responsible agencies. It is envisioned that this organizational effort will result in definitive project tasks and product submittals as well as work performance schedules. 2 Cost effective means of assembling, storing, updating and disseminating the tremendous volumes of data that will be generated during the course of the project will be required. The consultant team shall establish a clearinghouse or repository and locator system for various reports, drawings, photographs, and other documents t •onstatIENUNWOR ,The primary focus of this task will be to gather background information to provide a detailed inventory of the physical and environmental characteristics of MCAS, Tustin and its surrounding adjacent communities. The background information will serve as the database for plan preparation in addition to providing information for the environmental setting portion of the documentation - Environmental Impact Report and Statement (EiR/EIS). Current September 1991 aerial photographs of the site, flown by Airborne Systems for the Marine Corps, are available for procurement by the consultant. Automated base maps will also be available from the Marine Corps in Intcgraph Bentley Microstation format. The consultant will be responsible for reproduction of maps for their use. Accuracy of the base maps -is not guaranteed. However, they are estimated to be reasonably- current. For purposes of this scope, "Site" shall mean MCAS, 'Tustin $ n encom assithe existing boundaries of the base; "Reuse Area" shall mean those areas encompassing of MCAS, Tustin planned for disposal by the Marine Corps; "Retained Area" shall mean those areas of MCAS, Tustin to be retained for use by the Marine Corps_ 3.1 A thorough review of all existing planning and environmental documents, as -built plans, maps, aerials shall be completed to assure maximum utilization of existing data. Evaluate background and environmental information available to determine topic areas in which data needs to be generated or updated. 3.2 Review existing field surveys and studies (completed or underway by the Marine Corps.) and supplement with other field surveys, research and studies to identity local geology, as well as existing conditions relatcd to facilities, land uses, transportation systems, services, noise, air quality, toxics and hazardous materials, etc. Typical factors in this process shall include compilation ' of at least the following 3.2.1 existing landform & elevations 3.2.2 geotechnical assessment 3.2.3 soil and ground water contamination assessment. The Maxine Corps will be conducting on-going inves6cations of contamination during the course of this contract. All information will be rnade available to the consultant 3 by the Marine corps. as it is developed for incorporation into consultant's work. 3.2.4 hydrology - includes compilation of drainage characteristics of site including 100 year flood plain analysis and the effects of the regional drainage systems on the site. An identification of existing drainage facilities, flood control systems (age, physical condition, location, capacity) and related hydrology information will be provided by the Marine Corps. 3.2.5 biolobical resources - vegetation, wildlife & habitat, sensitive resources 3.2.6 cultural resources (1) arch aeologicallpaleontogical with source data available from the Marine Corps including record and reconnaissance review (2) historical architecture - documentation of historical significance of two lighter -than -air (blimp) hangars (age, condition, constraints of reuse); any other historical buildings on site (e.g. WWII era facilities). The Marine Corps will provide source data on all MCAS buildings and structures including, to the extent available, historical information. Coordination with the State Historic Preservation Office, and Federal. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation will be required by the Consultant. 3.2.7 Land use (existing) and facilities (1) areas to be retained by military. The Marine Corps will provide a real estate boundary map to identify approximate. areas to be sold and land to be retained by the Marine Corps. An additional "Retained Facilities Study" will be developed concurrent with reuse planning by the Marine Corps. This study will evaluate facility requirements and documentation to support any remaining population at MCAS, Tustin and include an analysis of recommended severance lines. Land uses recommended for the "Retained Area" shall be analyzed M in the EIR/EIS in addition to land use recommendations for the Reuse Area. (2) land use inventory & densities; facility locations; conditions, age, structural design and seismic stability of buildings and structures, presence of asbestos, existing utilities and mechanical systems servicing buildings. The Marine Corps will provide a Facility Inventory Study which will be a detailed inventory of all MCAS buildings and structures (except family housing), including condition of assets and identification of major equipment to be salvaged by the military prior to property disposal. (3) surrounding community land uses 3.2.8 utilities (age, condition, location, capacity) Input to this task from the Marine Corps will include existing utility maps and a utility study currently being prepared. The Utility Study Will evaluate existing utility systems to determine capacity and logical points of severance/connection for those portions of MCAS, Tustin to be retained by the Marine Corps. The Marine Corps study will include recommendations for cost effective utility service to the Retained Area. The Marine Corps Facility Inventory will also include an inventory of the following utilities: (1) water supply (2) wastewater/sewage (3) electricity (4) gas (5) telephone (6) cable and other communications 3.2.9 transportation/circulation {1) regional .and local setting surrounding base; existing and planned projects, current and anticipated deficiencies, review of adjoining city capital . improvement programs, a complete traffic impact assessment of current background.per Orange County Transportation Agency's Traffic Impact Assessment Methodology (2} on -base transportation systems 5 Input to this task from the Marine Corps will include a Circulation Study" which will evaluate traffic circulation in and around those portions of MCAS, Tustin to be retained by the Marine Corps, with input from local surrounding agencies and consideration of reuse alternatives developed under this contract. Traffic impacts associated with reuse of "Retained Area" shall be analyzed in the EIRIEIS along with Traffic Impacts of the "Reuse Area". (a) location (b) dimensions (c) existing access (d) existing physical condition (e) planned upgrades and improvements (� paved pedestrian sidewalks (g) unpaved paths . (h) bicycle paths . (3) public transportation serving site 3.2.14 Helicopter Airfield This discussion will be compiled from information in the MCAS Tustin Master Plan. Discussion shall include: a) Layout and dimensions b) Ciear zones/safety restrictions/approach flight paths C) surfaces • d) Navigational Aids (NAVAIDS) e) Aircraft parking areas f) Fuel storage/distribution systems g) Lightinj h) Existing avigation casements 3.2.11 Other Public Services a) law enforcement b) fire protection c) schools d) solid waste disposal e) other __ 6 3.3 Compile applicable Data Maps of project .site and surroundings at presentation scale and report scale. 3.4 Much of the data collected in this phase can be updated and depicted on base maps and in summary narrative form. 3.5 Products: An environmental setting report or reports suitable for incorporation into the EIR/EIS (10 screen copies, 25 copies, 1 reproducible to the City of Tustin; 10 screen copies and 15 final copies for Marine Corps) landuse and environmental field survey maps; base maps at presentation & report scale. 4.0 MARKET/DEMAND ANAL'YS1S 4.1 Define market area 4.2 Evaluate area economic trends Examine regional and localized demographic and market trends. Specific areas of focus will include existing and protected population, housing, employment and unemployment, personal earnings and household income, retail sales, vacancy rates, general real estate conditions, etc. 4.3 Analyze and forecast potential demand 4.3.1 Complete a demand analysis of residential, commercial retail, office, industrial (light & research and development), tourist and other tarp eted markets that might offer development opportunities on the base closure site. 4.3 .2 p Com ile supply characteristics of major competitive projects within each targeted market and compare against demand information to determine implications. Annual sales volumes per square foot, vacancy rates, duration of vacancy, price range, and land and lease costs will help to provide an indication of the magnitude of unsatisfied market demand. It should be recognized in the analysis that the major demand for base facilities in the past often has come from companies or entrepreneurs outside of the local market area who want to enter new markets rapidly.del Existing buildings and infrastructure at a surplus military site can -be readily used to provide production and distribution facilities with little or no lead- time required for permitting, construction, and/or other start-up activities at the site. 7 Potential restrictions to land use options and marketability caused by existing contamination must be considered. 4.3.3 Based on the above economic base analysis, identify by land use type, ro volume, timing or schedule, price or lease range, quality and g requirements, the best economic development targets for the site; information such as the number of supportable acres for specific land uses or the number of housing units required at various pricing lands should be provided. 4.4 Product:50 final copies, 1 Market Analysis report (10 screen copies; reproducible to the City of Tustin; 5 screen copies and 15 final copies for Marine Corps) . 5.0 CAUDE This component of the work program involves identification of issues, as well as opportunities and constraints. Activities under this task should be structured to serve as I /EIS scoping rocess required under Section 10.0 of this Scope of Work. part of the E P g P The consultant will be, asked to work closely with the base closure task force io assist in identifying issues based on background information collected. A community participation P rocess shall also be initiated in this stage to assess planning concerns and priorities of surrounding communities for base disposal and reuse of the base. 5.1 Preliminary issue identification 5.2 Identification of constraints and opportunities 5.3 Community attitude survey and workshop 5.4 PI9LL4S: 5.4.1 Presentation scale & report scale maps depicting opportunities and constraints.' 5.4.2 Community attitude survey 5.4.3 Issues inventory in the form of a memorandum for inclusion into ,the Specific Plan document (10 screen copies, 25 final copies, 1 reproduce to the City of Tustin; 5 screen copies and 15 final copies for Marine Corps). N 5.4.4 Materials for presentation at public workshop 6.0 12EYJSF aT,TER ;ATIVES 6.1 Develop goals and objectives of base disposaland reuse based on participation and scoping of task force and results of community participation.Consideration will be given to federal government regulations. (e.g. GSA screening) that may apply to property disposal options. 6.2 Develop and review alternative land use and circulation plans. 6.2.1 Consultant will prepare at least three alternative land use and circulation concepts for base reuse. 6.2.2 Each alternative plan will be an illustrative drawing depicting land uses, I densities, urban circulation, along with support data stating design concepts, basic assumptions, phasing implications, open space concepts, etc. Impacts of each alternative on portions of MCAS, Tustin to be retained by military and facility modifications required to serve the Retained Area under each alternative, traffic, and key environmental categories/issues will be summarized. Each alternative will be evaluated against its economic feasibility and fulfillment of goals and priorities established for base disposal and reuse. 6.2.3 Organize meeting of task force and community to introduce alternative plans and obtain public comment. 6.3 Prepare refined concept plan based on task force direction and public review. 6.4 pr�uct: Graphics and memorandum report as necessary to present reef ned alternative concepts (10 screen copies, 50 final copies, reproducible to the City of Tustin, 10 screen copies and 15 final copies and one reproducible for Marine Corps to be billed to Marine Corps). 7.0 CQ�L�Tr�I'iY k'A�ILI'I'IESI1V�'R.AS7'RUCTURE pLA]� 7.1 TheP rimary focus of this task involves identifying the needed infrastructure and Each alternative will be tentatively examined community facilities for the project. for impact and cost of improvements. The intent is to identify the appropriate infrastructure systems necessary for each alternative plan and to evaluate the financial feasibility of each alternative plan. Facility modifications required to serve the "Retained Area" under each alternative shall be included in this analysis. 7. 1.1 Identify all public improvements, responsible agencies, facilities and services, and yearly maintenance requirements for the reuse area. Coordination with Marine Corps consultant to develop compatible infrastructure plans for the "Reuse Area" and "Retained Area" is required. a. Prepare conceptual water and sewer service plans identifying servicing agencies, location and sizing of the backbone facilities and recognition of any phasing needs. b. Prep= a conceptual drainage plan for addressing the . location, sizing and type of facilities serving the planning area considering the impacts on land use and cost implications of implementation in either a phased manner or in a single step. C. Prepare conceptual alignments for any extension of arterial or " secondary roadways within the planning area including relationship of base to Eastern corridor alignment. d. Evaluate development phasing opportunities and constraints within the context of infrastructure. e. Evaluate opportunities for incorporating a retarding basin in open space/golf course. 7.1.2 Preliminary cost estimates for each improvement or facilih,. 7.2 Community facilities and improvements data will be refined for the preferred land use alternative plan. Recommendations will be made to provide the needed facilities with the optimum level of design efficiency. 7.2.1 Further refinement of public improvements and facilities based on the preferred alternative, including conceptus? circulation, drainage, water and sewer plans which indicate the location and size of major facilities. 7.2.2 Cost estimates for each improvement or facility. 10 7.2.3 Develop phasing criteria to ensure a balance between development and public improvements. Consideration of parcel availability pending environmental clean-up should be incorporated into phasing criteria. 7.3 Prod-uc : 10 screen copies of a technical memorandum, 25 draft copies, 50' final copies, (one reproducible to City of Tustin; 10 screen copies, 15 draft and 15 final copies required for Marine Corps). Report information will also be used in Fiscal Impact Report. 8.0 MSCAL DVTACT AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS REPORT 8.1 Construct a detailed computer based fiscal model to analyze the projected City costs and revenues associated with at least three reuse (land use) alternatives for the base. The purpose of the analysis is to ensure that the preferred land use plan will generate adequate revenues to cover any estimated expenditures, both at build- out and as development takes place. Revenues shall be shown by major category, capital expenditures, and in expenditures by functional category, the next fiscal balance and the discounted net present value of the fiscal balance. In the case of fiscal deficits, mitigation measures will be recommended. 8.2 Develop a set of detailed financing options for any infrastructure requirements necessary to set the stage for development. Alternative sets of financing mechanisms and alternative ways to spread the financial burden should be tested. Alternative* financing options should be tested against a range of assumptions regarding the phasing of development, including type, timing, and extent of development. 8.3 Product 8.3.1 Fiscal Impact Program & Report (10 screen copies, 50 final copies, 1 reproducible to City of Tustin; 5 final copies for Marine Corps). 8.3.2 Financing Plan (10 screen copies, 50 final copies, 1 reproducible to City of Tustin; 5 final copies for Marine Corps). 8.3.3 User Guide & Training to automated Fiscal Model to run a City computer system (user guide - 5 screen copies, 25 final copies, I reproducible, training session for 10 employees and original computer disc in PC format, IBM compatible.) 11 9.0 SPECIFIC PLAN PREPARATION 9.1 Develop a specific plan in accordance with provisions of Section 65450 of the Government Code based on the preferred alternative. The Plan shall at minimum include: 9. 1.1 A land use master plan 9.1.2 Urban design plan & design guidelines 9.1.3 A circulation concept plan 9.1.4 A drainage concept plan 9.1.5 Water and sewer concept plan 9.1.6 Landscape concept plan 9.1.7 Phasing concept plan 9.1.8 Land use and development standards 9.1.9 Implementation and Plan Administration 9.2 Produc 9.2.1 A specific plan suitable for adoption. Presentation scale maps depicting concept plans, as needed for public hearings. 9.2.2 An executive copy of plan (10 screen copies, 25 draft copies, 50 final copies, 1 reproducible to City of Tustin; 10 draft and 15 final copies for Marine Corps). 9.2.3 A 35 mm slide show which illustrates planning process and summarizes plan. An IBM compatible word processing disk containing the final plan report; format to be on word perfect version 5.0. 12- 1.0.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMP ACT REPORT(ENVIRONNIEENTAL TAPACT STATEMENT ON SPECIFIC PLAN/BASE DISPOSAL A_ND REUSE Ai\'D RELA'T'ED PROTECTS PLAN 10.2 Prepare Initial ,Study for EIR/EIS and Notice of Preparation Prepare, publish and distribute the Notice of Intent to prepare an EISIEIR (note that all notices and correspondence prepared shall be approved by the City of Tustin and Marine CorpA and released or authorized for release by the City of Tustin and Marine Corps). The EIR/EIS shall be prepared in accordance with CEQ Regulations (40CFR Parts 1502-1508) format incorporating all requirements of CEQA. 10.2 Data Collection 10.2.1 Review data collected during background analysis including existing and planned adjacent land uses, socio-economic/demographic : characteristics of the project vicinity and city policies. Some additional analysis may be required. 10.2.2 Review existing general plan elements and zoning ordinance to identify goals or policies as they relate to the project and determine compatibility and consistency issues. 10.3 EIR/EIS Scoping Process 10.3.1 The Scoping Process shall be incorporated into the community participation process outlined in Section 5.0 and 11.0 of this Scope of Work. 10.3.2 Prepare all scoping letters, announcements, presentations and distribution lists. Coordinate all aspects of public scoping meetings. 10.4 Document Preparation Document preparation shall follow the format established by 40 CFR Part 1502 and shall include the following specific sections: 10.4.1 Prepare an introduction and summary section 10.4.2 Prepare project description, purpose and nein 13 10.4.3 Prepare existing environmental setting discussion 10.4.4 - Document impacts and recommend mitigation measures Additional significant traffic analysis of the project and each alternative will be necessary. Again the level of detail required will be methodology promulgated by the OCTA for Traffic Impact 'Assessments. At minimum, it is expected that City of Tustin, Irvine and Santa Ana traffic analysis projection will be necessary, daily and peak hour travel demands as well as ADT traffic volumes for identified roadway links and intersections; capacity deficiencies and changes necessary to Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways; the impacts of the project (both "Retained Area" and "Reuse Area") and alternative land use and circulation concepts and. the impacts of phasing; recommended mitigation measures to ensure roadways can handle future traffic volumes; development of criteria for phasing mitigation measures; determination of estimated costs and funding sources for recommended mitigation measures. Prepare a mitigation monitoring plan. Required documentation and consultation with the State Office of Historical Preservation will be required for any historical structures proposed to be removed, altered or affected in conjunction with base reuse decisions or plan. 10.4.5 The disposal and reuse alternatives developed in the Specific Plan preparation process will meet the requirements of CEQA and NEPA for alternatives to the project. The no action/no project alternative will also be included. 10.4.6 Prepare any other required sections of EIR/EIS either required by CEQA or &&EPA, as may be applicable. 10.4:7 Complete all public notices (i.e. Notice of Preparation, Notice of Intent, Notice of Completion and Record of Decision) 10.4.8 Prepare any necessary Planning Commission and City Council resolutions for certification of environmental documents with findings of overriding consideration 14 10.5 Produg Screencheck draft EIR/EIS, (10 copies to City of Tustin; 25 copies for Marine Corps), Draft (75 copies to City plus one reproducible; 30 copies to Marine Corps plus one reproducible). Screeneheck final EIR/EIS and draft Record of Decision (10 copies to City; 25 copies to Marine Corps), Final EIR/EIS (75 copies to City of Tustin plus one reproducible; 100 copies to Marine Corps ; plus one reproducible), Notices and Resolutions; List of Agencies �to receive notices and Draft EIR/EIS. Marino Corps will assist in preparation of distribution list to avoid duplication between City and Marine Corps distribution requirements. Note that revisions to final EIR/EIS may be required prior to publishing Record of Decision to respond to public comments during the final notice period. 11.0 CO TY PARTICIPATION 11.1.1 In conjunction with previous tasks, conduct a series of public workshops to obtain public comments on the status and progress of the base disposal and reuse planning process. The number, location and format shall be mutually agreed upon with the City. However, at minimum, it is expected that at least four workshops will be necessary. 11.1.2 Contact State, Federal, County and adjacent cities to determine interests in public benefit uses on the site. 11. 1.3, Prepare any accessary handouts for distribution to the public at public workshops. 11.1.4 Attend all Planning Commission and City Council hearings on the Base Meuse Plan kat minimum, two hearings before each body are anticipated). 11.1.5 Product: Memorandum summary of results of all community interactions (copies sufficient for distribution to participating parties). CA-S:kbc\nuu.3 15 E. PROJECT TEAM I. INTRODUCTION This proposal to prepare a Reuse Plan/Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report for reuse of the Marine Air Corps Station, Tustin, is submitted by Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff (HNTB) of Irvine, California. The representative of HNTB authorized to submit this proposal and contract with the City of Tustin is Ronald L. Hartje, Partner. HNTB will be the prime consultant and will contract directly with the City of Tustin. HNTB will subcontract with the firms and individuals which are on the project team and the advisory panel. We have analyzed the expertise and experience needed to successfully complete your project. Our team has been carefully selected to provide that expertise at the highest level and to meet all the needs of the project. The project team is shown below: Firm .Individual .. Pnn�ipal Role Years in` Business HNTB Project Management Specific Plan 77 years The Planning Center Coordinate Specific Plan Community Participation 16 years ERA Market Economics Fiscal Impact 33 years Cotton/Beland Associates EIR/EIS 16 years Austin -Foust Traffic Modeling 10 years Thirtieth Street Architects Historic Preservation/ Architects 15 years Our advisory panel consists of experts in specific areas of base reuse, who will assist the project team at key points in the process. They are: Individual . Role Wilbur Baumann Base Reuse Financial Impact William Laubernds Base Redevelopment/ Land Use Alternatives 13 HNTB has previously worked with The Planning Center, ERA, and Austin -Foust. The addition of Cotton/Beland Associates, Inc. provides the team and each firm, individuals who are familiar with working on a multi -discipline project teams. They understand their role and are seasoned professionals. HNTB's project management role, according to the Scope of Services, Appendix A. and our approach will be discussed in the next section in detail. Overall management of the team will be led by HNTB to complete the work tasks as follows: ■ Assemble/administer sub -consultant contract E Direct/supervise project tasks/task assignments N Evaluate draft/final documents N Monitor/maintain computerized schedules 0 Participate in meetings with City, MCAS, and authorized public agencies ■ Project progress of information, monthly reports, distribution of reuse alternatives, specific plan, and EIR/EIS Knowledge of Tustin/Orange County The project team has extensive experience in Orange County generally and is knowledgeable regarding the City of Tustin and intergovernmental context within which this project will be advanced. This is particularly critical because the Reuse Plan is a project of regional significance. Such projects can expect to be subject to unprecedented review, comment, and pressure from a variety of governmental and citizen organizations. Local experience and the ability to communicate from a foundation of current and past relationships will be invaluable in conducting this planning process/reuse study. The projects included in the Experience of the Firms section illustrates the extent of this insight. There is an extensive number in Orange County. Additionally, several key team members have notable long term knowledge of this area. In particular, Al Bell, who will lead the community participation program, has been in either public or private planning practice in Orange County for over 30 years. 14 Evaluation Factors E Strong project manager N Previous experience of key personnel N Relevance of firm's projects and products ■ Proposal action plan ■ Favorable response from references ■ Creativity in solving problems ■ Soundness in Planning process and methods ■ Meeting the legal and state guidelines ■ Quality of previously prepared specific plans and EIR 9 s ■ Experience and knowledge of Tustin and Orange County issues W Experience in military reuse and/or facilities planning O Prior experience with planning and development of billion dollar complex, multi- purpose, land use programs 15 I1. APPROACH This section describes our understanding of the project, our general approach to key elements of the planning and environmental study, and our specific approach to the Scope of Services identified in the RFP. Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin MCAS Tustin has served since 1951 as a center for helicopter operations for the Marine Corps. Prior to that it was used as a Navy lighter -than -air base during World War II. Current plans are for closure of the base in 1997. The Marine Corps will retain the family housing, community support areas, and the Armed Forces Reserve Center. The Reuse Planning Study will include coordination of the MCAS Retained area and City of Tustin reuse areas. MCAS Tustin is one of the largest remaining tracts of land for development in Orange County. Situated on level ground in close proximity to major freeways and other transportation corridors and with community facilities and services nearby, it is prime real estate for urban development. Typical of most military bases, there are a number of limitations to future reuse, the most serious of which appear to be air quality degradation, traffic congestion, environmental soil contamination, and asbestos in buildings. A unique characteristic of the base is the two wood framed blimp hangars which are listed on the National Register of Historic Places and will be addressed in the reuse plan, as outlined in the Scope of Service. The development potential of MCAS Tustin presents tremendous opportunities for all parties -- the City of Tustin, other adjacent communities, Orange County, and the Marine Corps -- to benefit significantly from reuse. The Reuse Plan/Specific Plan for MCAS Tustin will program to follow. It will need to be solidly based issues that exist, be strongly supported by all part possible), and look with vision to the future. 16 be the foundation for the reuse in facts, deal realistically with ;the ies (at least to the extent that is Anticipated Issues There are a number of potentially significant issues which could require focused attention. Some relate to. the inherent scale and complexity of reusing this large, strategically significant site. Others have to do with agendas and priorities of interests which may conflict with the City's priorities or which may further complicate plan formulation, adoption, and implementation. It is necessary to take these matters comprehensively as the decision making environment is filled with challenges which may appear relatively insignificant, yet can mushroom into difficult issues if not handled effectively. The following list represents an initial assessment of important issues which the community participation and intergovernmental coordination processes will enhance as part of the work program. ■ Land Use. The City will clearly be interested in land uses which have positive fiscal value, as well as other community benefits. Others my prefer regional recreational priorities to dominate because of citizen concerns regarding open space and recreation in central Orange County. There will also be pressure for housing, including affordable housing and responsiveness to needs of the homeless, in part responding to the McKinney Act. Compatibility with adjacent residential development will be an important dimension of the Reuse Plan. Another key dimension of this issue will be the achievement of a workable balance of uses within the project and within the surrounding commuting patterns. Transportation. Traffic congestion remains the dominant concern of Orange County citizens. These is a great potential for folding far-reaching transportation ideas into this project. At the same time, transportation facilities must be economically feasible and tim?ly. In any case, citizen concerns regarding traffic impacts must receive high priority. This aspect of the plan must be carefully integrated with the Orange County Congestion Management Program, Measure M Growth Management Program, and implementation of the Air Quality Management Plan. ■ Regional Growth Management and Air Quality. These concerns will become significant factors in the CEQA progress. The potential for an unusually responsive development concept from growth management and air quality perspectives will be offset by the net increase in project impacts over the current use (this assumes some very positive changes over the present use from these perspectives, as well). These considerations can become focused by interests who oppose,, certain aspects of the Reuse Plan. 17 i Financing. There is a growing concern, particularly in southern California, regarding workable methods for financing development. A sound financing strategy is imperative. The overall strategy or specific financing methods within it may be the object of challenge by interest with other priorities or general concerns about incurring further public debt liability. Impacts on Adjacent .jurisdictions. The City has wisely structured a Task Force representing the appropriate local governments. The scale of this project and its proximity to adjacent cities may still raise impact issues requiring sensitive treatment and negotiations, including possible interlocal agreements. This may particularly come to play regarding transportation impacts (CMP Deficiency Plans; joint funding, etc.). N Infrastructure. Infrastructure at military bases has typically been installed in different periods as the base expanded, using different criteria and different materials, usually without easements, and not in conformance with today's municipal standards. It will be important to determine the extent the existing system can meet an "early use" scenario. Often financing and replacing infrastructure is a major hurdle to reuse. The needed on-site and off-site improvements will be important to establish at an early stage. ■ Environmental Remediation. The RFP identified 10 soil contamination "hot spots" and 105 buildings with asbestos contamination. While the federal government is responsible for clean up, their remediation is dependent on funding and may take a number of years. Land conveyance of property(s) with contamination will require special considerations. Reuse planning will need to take these factors into account, and phasing may be required. Other forms of contamination will be reviewed and documented as supplied by the Marine Corps. USMC is conducting soils contamination analysis presently, which will be used as base data for the reuse study. Approach to Project Management The Tustin Re -use Study requires strong leadership and project management which responds to numerous jurisdictions and agencies on complex issues. In many instances, the interdisciplinary project requirements will be to clarify concerns, focus on objective understanding and resolve planning issues collectively. HNTB's project management system is based on detailed task assignment and scheduling using a computerized project management system, developing clear lines of authority and responsibility, and closely monitoring project status and cost control using the H NTB cost control system. We emphasize communications and follow up so each team member understands their task, when it is scheduled, and how it interrelates with other tasks. im 2. ORGANIZATION CHART Tustin Cite Council I Tustin Council Steering Committee E Base RC -Use —�—CCityTask Force Project Manager Ron Wortman HNTI3 Re-: 7SC AitelTlall\•CS Roll V-6.N..-Ini tll li�T13 1.1 }:'r IC Jolla Bridges-C11A j 1C,:JfC Plan Gra\' IT\Tr3 Nla rl._1 I:cono1111CS' I 1 Iscal II1mpict Dnvid Wilcox -ERA Dune 013rien-LRA }::It1nm Gr \-lI\TTI }:,reit Gu11v-TPC R:ulci\- Jackson -TPC Paul Jew,,cil-1INTB Mike \l'right-ERA AI Bell -TPC Don Aranlbi la -TPC C\'mlli. Janis -L• R -A Dive Wllcoz-EFA Jolm Loomis -TSA Joiul Loonii-000i ST Jim liatch-IT';T13 Tern* Austul-A'F • MCAS Staff itv Ctafl` . CAN, Staff • Proiect Committee Principal -in -Charge Ronald Harlje HNTB Re -Use Process Advisors VY'llliain Laubernds v Ilbur 173mil11,.1111 1SS:7CS'CoI1L'll:lull\" Pa:�icipatioll Al Bell -TPC Randy Jacks011-TPC 1.1 }:'r IC Jolla Bridges-C11A Donald Cotlon-CBA K.ren Gulley -TPC Ra\•nlond Penciro-C13A Irma Fuikelsteill-CBA TcT• Austul-AlF Tic c Madre-Consultints Leighton fi .Ssoc., Inc. John \knell &, Aswc., Inc. John I&alis-TSA HNTB/TPC/ERA/CBA Other TechItICal/AdIIIIIlIStratIVC Support 19 2. ORGANIZATION CHART Tustin Cite Council F i Tustin Council Steering Committee . Base Re -Use —�— City of Tustin Task force Christine Siiingleton Assistant ............ City Maiia�cr Prgiect Manager Ron X'ortnlan H?�ITI3 N, S Principal -in -Charge Ronald Harije HNTB Re -Use Process Advisors William Laubemids V1' llbllr Baumann • MCAS Staff • City Staff • Prgject Committee HNTB/TP C/ERA/CB A Other Technical/Admiliistrative Support PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR BASE DISPOSAL AND RE -USE MARINE CORPS AIR STATION TUSTIN Introduction The abbreviated version represents the HNTB's consultants roles and responsibilities as defined in the Scope of Work. Precise project schedules, products and meetings have been indicated earlier, in the Team Organisation and Qualification of Key Members. HNTB (PRIME CONSULTANT): PARTNER: PROJECT MANAGER: ROLES: Management/Specific Plan Lead Engineering Lead - Documentation Ronald L. Hartje Ronald G. Wortman • Provide review of all Documentation, Repository of Existing Data, Review and Dissemination of Background Data, Analysis; Screen, Draft and Final EIR/EIS as well as Lead Specific Plan Preparation within issue identification and Re -Use Alternatives. Review/Attend all public meetings during 18 month schedule. • Conduct Authorized Interviews • Preparation of Specific Plan with TPC • Infra -Structure Analysis/Cost Estimates • Overview Issues/ Re -Use Alternatives • Mapping/Computer Generated Data • Product Review/ Distribution • Meetings/MCAS Tustin/City Counci!/Task Force/Planning Commission • Public Hearings/Community Participation RESPONSIBILITIES: • Monitor/Confirm Sub -Consultants Deliverables • Review of all Document Preparation • Lead Review of Specific Plan • Budget Controls/ Monitor System • Schedule Controls for Sub -consultants 20 COTTON/BELAND ASSOC. INC: Preparation of EIR/EIS PRINCIPAL: Don Cotton PROJECT MANAGER: John Bridges ROLES: • Background/Analysis • Document Action for Reuse • Document Action for Disposal of Retained Areas • Coordinate Project Issues/General Plan, Components/Opportunities & Constraints • Coordinate Sub -Consultant Background/Analysis and Environmental Setting for Biology, Archeological, Paleontological, Water and Hydrology, and Cultural Resources RESPONSIBILITIES • Preparation of Background Analysis • Initial Studies • Environmental Scoping/Process Identified in Issue Identification • Environmental Assessment • Environmental Setting • Draft EIR/EIS • Screen Check/Final EIR/EIS Sub -Consultants of CBA: Environmental Setting Support for Information Describing the following: • Tierra Madre: • John Minch & Associates: • Leighton and Associates 21 Biological Resources Archeological, Paleontological Geology , Hydrology and Sol Condition PRINCIPAL: David Wilcox ROLES: • Background Analysis/Issues/General Update/Opportunities/Constraints Sessions • Review Reuse Alternatives/ Interpret Potential Market Candidates • Review - Analysis of Inventory of Market POTENTIAL • Review - Analysis for Specialized Uses • Fiscal Improvement/Alternative Analysis • Financing Options/Alternatives • Review for EIR/EIS Preparation RESPONSIBILITIES: • Preparation of Market/Demand Analysis • Preparation of Fiscal/ Financial Impact Analysis • Public Hearings (Authorized by Tustin/MCAS) THE PLANNING CENTER: ROLE: PRINCIPAL: PROJECT LEADER: Plan Issues, Reuse Alternatives, Community Participation, Specific Plan/Collaboration Randy Jackson Al Bell • Background/MCAS Tustin/General Plan Elements • Opportunities/Constraints • Issues Identification • Coordinate Specific Plan Preparation with HNTB • Lead Community Participation/Coordination • Mail Survey with Aggregate Evaluation RESPONSIBILITIES: • Preparation of Issues/Reuse Alternative Diagrams/ Narratives • Preparation for Interviews/Community Participation/Public Hearings on Reuse Potential • HNTB/TPC Specific Plan Preparation 22 AUSTIN/FOUST: Traffic Modeling PRINCIPAL: Terence Austin ROLES: • Traffic Background/Data Analysis • Review MCAS Tustin Consultants Traffic Impacts in the Retained Areas • Modeling Evaluation of Alternative Circulation Schemes • Review Proposed Circulation Improvements/and Analyze/Alternatives Within Fiscal Cost Estimates • Explore Alternative Multi -Model Option Within Preferred Alternatives RESPONSIBILITIES: • Review Traffic Modeling for Tustin/County for Reuse at MCAS Tustin • Prepare Circulation Alternatives with the HNTB Team • Prepare Traffic Impact for EIR/EIS with HNTB • Community (Public) Hearings for Alternatives/ Including Task Force Discussions THIRTIETH STREET: Historic Evaluation/ Reuse of Historic Buildings PRINCIPAL: John Loomis ROLES: • Collect Background/Data for Historic Structures and Other Designated Historic Structures • Examine/ Evaluate Historical Characteristics for EIR/EIS • Evaluate Reuse Alternatives for Hangars/Other Historical Buildings on site. • Evaluate 106 Review, if Determined Necessary or Required. • Review with HNTB/CBA Cultural Resource Preparation. RESPONSIBILITIES: • Preparation EIR/EIS Historic Documentation • Coordination with SHPO and Advisory Council for Historic Preservation 23 ADVISORY GROUP: Consult Reuse, Review Financial Land Use Options PRINCIPAL: Bill Laubernds PROJECT LEADER: Bill Baumann ROLES: • Advise on Issues/Reuse Alternatives • Advise/Comment on Financial Options for Reuse • Comment on Retained Areas/Reuse Area Coordination RESPONSIBILITIES: • Review EIR/EIS Alternatives and Financial Options for Improvements, Build- out, etc. • Provide input on Land Use Alternatives for the City of Tustin/MCAS and other project team members. 24 3. ROLES & RESPON LITIES ROLE . STAFF PERSON YEARS EXP. RECENT PROJECTS HNTB Civil Engineering Bob Smith 12 San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Utilities -Demand Jim Hatch 38 LAX Runway Utilities Computer/Circulation Paul F. Jensen 10 Orange County Toll Roads Drainage Steve Rinnert 12 Orange County Toll Roads Helicopter William F. Wilkie 10 Naval Aviation Training System Plan Land Use Planning Scott Cantine 25 The Deck at Central Avenue MCAS/Coordination Ed Schippman 22 Mayport Naval Station, Florida THE PLANNING CENTER Reuse Direction Randy Jackson 20 Aliso Greenbelt, Orange County, CA Policy Planner Karen Gulley 10 City of Temecula General Plan Urban Design/Reuse Don Arabula 12 Beacon Hill, Laguna Niguel Community Participation Al Bell 30 City of Irvine, General Plan ERA Market Diane O'Brien 10 Mather AFB Reuse Plan Economic Forecast David Wilcox 25 George AFB Economic Development Cynthia Janis 4 Monterey Park Feasibility/Mkt for Retail Revitalization Michael A. Wright 4 City of Ventura EIA CBA General Plan Overview Don Cotton 25 General Plan for Tustin, CA Environmental John Bridges 21 City of Orange General Plan & EIR TIERRA MADRE Biology I Stephen J. Myers I 15 US Forest Service Riparian, Bird Study Natural Resources . Scott White I 8 San Bernardino County Mitigation JOHN MINCH & ASSOC. Archeological John Minch 22 Transportation Corridor Agency Paleontological Thomas Leslie 18 County of Orange, TCA LEIGHTON & ASSOC. Geology Michael Stewart 20 Ney Ranch, Oceanside, CA Hazardous Waste Thomas Mills 15 Navy '32 St. Exchange, San Diego, CA 25 ROLE STAFF YEARS RECENT PERSON EXP. PROJECTS THIRTIETH STREET Historical Preservation John Loomis 21 Historical Resources Survey: 26 City of Tustin, Old Town Irvine Alternatives Chip Gulley 12 Perris Public Library AUSTIN-FOUST Traffic Modeling Terry Austin 25 Circulation System Analysis/Tustin Transportation Analyst Phong Le 15 Santa Ana/Tustin TIP Transportation Planner Krys Saldivar 11 Newport Beach GP Circulation Study 26 RONALD L. HARTJE, P.E. Partner Education Professional Registrations Professional Affiliations General Background Iowa State University, 1972 B.S. Civil Engineering P.E. California # C045770 plus 6 other states American Society of Civil Engineers National Society of Professional Engineers Society of American Military Engineers International Bridge, Tunnel & Turnpike Associations Highways Users Federation American Road and Transportation Builders Associations Institute of Traffic Engineers As Partner -in -Charge of HNTB's Southern California offices, Mr. Hartje is responsible for directing HNTB's engineering and architectural efforts throughout Southern California. Mr. Hartje's experience includes major freeway, toll road, toll bridge, arterial streets, bridges, transportation planning and studies, airport improvements and a wide variety of civil transportation projects. Mr. Hartje recently served as the Project Director for the Corridor Design Management Group, a joint venture which HNTB is in a lead role, providing management services for three major toll roads in Orange County, the San Joaquin, Eastern and Foothill Transportation Corridors. Total construction costs is over $2 billion and involves over 60 section designers. Responsibilities included overall organization and leadership functions for the directing of over 140 personnel, quality control and project management, while maintaining continuity between the Partners of the Joint Venture and the client, the Transportation Corridor Agencies, a collective group representing the cities in Orange County and the County and Caltrans. 27 r .71. Hartje, I Page 2 I • Mr. Hartje has overall responsibility for HNTB's participation in the AB 680 Private Tollroad competition conducted by the California Department of Transportation. HNTB is the lead engineer for a private consortium that is designing, constructing, and operating a private toll road in Orange County, California on State Route 91. The innovative concept involves building four toll lanes in the median of an eight -lane freeway utilizing 100% Automatic Vehicle Identification (a toll road without toll plazas) • Mr. Hartje is also a member of the California AVI Task Force representing the Transportation Corridor Agencies assisting representatives of Caltrans and the Golden Gate Bridge Authority in developing guidelines for a general statewide AVI System to be used on all of California's toll facilities. • Mr. Hartje served as Principal -in -Charge for the I-5 Widening Project, Orange County, California. This proejct included final design plans for 8 replacement ' bridges on the I-5. Among these bridges is a double track railroad steel through girder structure with spans up to 150 feet. The other I-5 structures are grade separations ranging in length from 170 to 700 feet and in width from 50 to 300 feet. A below grade stormwater cast -in-place pumping plant was also designed. The project also included the replacement of a 6- lane freeway a to 12- lane plus 2- lane transit way while maintaining traffic on I-5 North of Route 55 and South of Route 22. Also responsible for the development of final construction plans and staging documents for the above structures, along with preparing final construction traffic staging plans. • Mr. Hartje served as Principal -in -Charge for the widening and extending of the existing Hamilton/Victoria Bridge over the Santa Ana River. The Harnilton/Victoria rehabilitation project consisted of removing a longitudinal half of the structure and replacing with a wider structure together with extending the bridge, designing and seismically retrofitting the resulting structure to meet Caltrans current specifications. • Mr. Hartje served as Principal -in -Charge for the study of the transportation uses of the Los Angeles River channel located in Los Angeles County. HNTB performed conceptual engineering studies and design for potential transportation uses of paved portions of flood control channels on the L.A. River and Tujun( a Wash. Studied several modes of transportation, but focused efforts on a highway facility. Examined highway facility for toll and free operation alternatives. Perfonned analysis of existing conditions Hartje, i Page 3 jincluding physical channel characteristics, seismic analysis of bridges and two dams (by subconsultant), and existing operations and maintenance program. Engineering studies for highway facility included typical sections, interchange studies, operations and maintenance program and development of design standards. Developed cost estimates for toll and free highway facility, operations and i maintenance estimates, and determined funding alternatives. • Project Principal for the final design, plans, specifications, and estimates for the $2 million Golden West Transportation Center in Huntington Beach, CA. This project consists of parking for 175 automobiles, 12 bus bays, covered waiting areas, public conveniences and associated signing and lighting for the 3 -acre bus transfer facility. The multi -disciplined design team is preparing a traffic study and architectural, civil, structural, mechanical and electrical PS&E. Permits and agency approvals, in addition to construction support are also included. • Project Principal for engineering feasibility studies for the General Aviation Economic Study at John Wayne Airport in Orange County, CA. HNTB was responsible for concept development, preliminary planning, and construction estimates for several alternative general aviation hangar and terminal configurations at the airport. • Project Principal for the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment for the Imperial Highway Super Street. HNTB is responsible for the preliminary design and environmental documentation for the upgrade of 12 miles of Imperial Highway through suburban Orange County, CA. from it's current configuration of 2 to 6 lanes to a 6 -lane super street. Significant interagency coordination and public participation is required for this project. Mr. Hartje served as Principal -in -Charge for the Anaheim Convention Center, Betterment III project located in Anaheim, California. This project consisted of the renovation and expansion of a 570,000 s.f. facility. The project included construction of a new 150,000 s.f. exhibit hall and lobby pre -function with parking below. Mr. Hartje served as Principal -in -Charge for the Los Angeles Coliseum Renovation project located in Los Angeles, California. This project consisted of the renovation of the Coliseum into a state of the art football facility, with new suites, seating and support facilities. 29 Ronald G. Wortman Mr. Wortman's diverse experience in urban planning and landscape design includes planning and design of large scale mixed-use commercial, industrial and residential projects. Mr. Wortman has assisted and prepared master planning concepts for investment decisions and implementation for major projects, both in the United States and overseas. Education Professional Affiliations Awards/Publication Selected Projects: Harvard University Post Graduate Studies Wayne State University Master of Urban Design/Urban Planning University of Michigan Bachelor of Architecture American Society of Landscape Architects Urban Land Institute Concrete Industry Boards, "Urban Amentities Award" for Citicorp Center, New York Center. National Foundation for the Arts, Traveling Fellowship • Long Pointe, Rancho Palos Verdes, California. Mr Wortman's responsibility as project manager was to master plan 102 acre, 500,000 square foot destination resort hotel for the Verdes Peninsula. Design services included conceptual recreational amentities, EIR reviews, CUP, and approvals. Orange County Toll Roads, Orange County, California. Mr. Wortman's responsibility included project manager/director for the design aesthetics for 65 miles of cooridors. Design services included aesthetic 'study for hardscape/softscape, drawings and quidelines for the foothill and San Joaquin Corridors. The project included Caltrans, TCA and Irvine/Santa Margarita and Mission Viejo companies. Saturn Manufacturing Facility, Spring Hill, Tennessee. Project Manager for planning of 2,500 acre site including 4.0 million square foot manufacturing space and 375,000 square foot training and support/administration facility. Design/Management services included site planning , coordination with civil ans architectural design guidelines, design development, and landscape architecture. M i • The Plaza, Kansas City, Missouri. Mr Wortman's roles included project manager/principal urban designer for a 2.2 million square foot mixed-use high density hotel, retail, residential, land urban open space under construction. The project involved intensive interaction with Kansas City Council and planning groups. • McDonnell Douglas, Douglas Aircraft Company, Yuma, Arizona. Master planning services for aircraft delivery center and fight test offices adjacent to Yuma International Airport, approximately 640 acres. General Motors, Headquarters, Warren, Michigan. Master planning/design services to formulate ultimate "build out" as new facility, related to the Saarinen Plan, and process programs were developed. Facility programming scenarios were developed to test expansion of three million square feet over 500 acres. • General Motors (Buick City), Flint, Michigan. Project Manager for siting planning/master development facility plan for 2.4 million square feet for developing "just in time" delivery approach to manufacturing and non -manufacturing space. Services included design for capitol improvement program for GM management. 31 Kathy 'n Gray Senior Project Alanager Kathryn Gray is an Urban Planner with over 15 years professional experience balanced between Public Land Use Policy and Urban Design applications. Ms. Gray has focused her career on unique and often complex projects that frequently require carving out uncharted territory with respect to public policy. While previously with the Planning Center, 1\1s. Gray has played a key managing role in an array of such projects both in the private and public sectors including: Education: B.S. Urban Studies/Environmental Science, University of Oregon, University of France/Portland State APA, ULI Inland Empire/APA Award (1990) Outstanding Reuse Plan Five Years Private Planning Experience Selected Projects: • Adelanto/George Air Force Base Reuse Plan, Adelanto, California - This project involves development of a Reuse Plan for George Air Force Base which is schedule to be closed in January, 1993. The Adelanto Reuse Plan calls for the Base to be development into a major, international airport and transportation hub to serve a 25 million annual passenger shortfall projected to occur in the Southern California region over the next 20 years. More than thirty leading aviation experts were involved in crafting the "High Desert International Airport Master Plan" under Ms. Gray's direction. A major component of this project is a Strategic Planning Program, the purpose of which, is to develop strategies for and negotiate protection of Adelanto's interests in the reuse of George Air Force Base and to generate public support for the "Adelanto" Plan. • Adelanto General Plan Update, Adelanto, California - This project involves creating a new :Master Development Pla„ for the City of Adelanto wlilcli allows the City to plan for and tale advantage of the development of George Air Force Base into a major, international transportation center. In addition -to development of the land use plan, the project is designed to act as a development manual for developing within the Cite over the next ?0 years. The population is expectea► to crow from 7,500 to over =0.000 people during that time frame. • Southern California Regional Aviation Study/Orange County Airport Site Selection Studv, Orange County, California - Tilis 3 -near study focused on finding alternative sites for expanding air transportation services for a 25 million annual passenger shortfall projected to occur in Orange, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties by 2010. The project entailed two major components, the Technical Study, for «Milch Ms. Gray served as Project Manager. and an involved Citizen Participation Strategy Program. Tlii.s dc:initive study serves as a basis for Aviation planning efforts now underway in Orange County and the Southern California Remon. 32 i Gray, I Page 2 • Los Angeles County General Plan Update, Los Angeles County, California - The General Plan provides basic policy guidence for the physical development and conservation of the County environment. Although it does not set policy fbr the 85 Cities within its borders, the Plan reflects and influences city plans. The County General Plan includes more than 2000 pages in its unabridged entirety and portions have not been updated for more than 14 years. The Planning Center's work on this project consisted of creating an infonnationally current, user-friendly, summary version of The General Plan, that would make its mandated policies accessible to the development community that must abide by them. • Pacific Electric Corridor Specific Plan, Garden Grove, California - This project entailed management of the preparation of a Specific Plan within a 100 feet by 3 1/2 -mile study area which had been the historical route of the Pacific Electric Train system known as the "Red Car" Line. The project involved creation of alternative uses, including conversion of the land into uses which would fit itseemlessly" into the adjacent land uses. • Rancho Las Flores Specific Plan, Hesperia, California - This project involved The Planning Center being retained to provide City Staff Services to manage the processing of the Rancho Las Flores Project through the recently incorporated City. Because the City had no adopted specific plan regulations in place at the time, the project entailed converting the Ranch Las Flores Development Master Plan into a regulatory Specific Plan that could serve as a model for City Specific Plan regulations. • Foothill/Trabucco Specific Plan, Orange County, California - This project was unique because it was the first planning effort to respond to the County's recently adopted Growth Management Regulations designed to protect environmentally sensitive areas experiencing growth pressures. The Trabucco Canyon area is one of the most pristine scenic areas remaining in Orange County and contains some of the few remaining large stands of oak woodlaTids. The project entailed working with existing residents and developers to established a Plan that would assure development within the area would occur in a manner that would protect the unique qualities and sensitivities of the area. 33 JAMES HATCH Director of Construction Administration Education General Background North Carolina State University B.S. Civil Engineering, 1951 As Director of Construction Administration for HNTB the Los Angeles and Orange County area, Mr. Hatch supervises all of the civil and public works projects design by HNTB. His responsibilities include construction estimating, preparation of bidding documents, evaluation of bids, and supervision of construction. With over 30 years of professional experience, including overseas assignments, Mr. Hatch has been involved in a variety of transit and architectural projects. Since joining HNTB in 1959, he has been involved in various assignments, engaging in civil engineering design, airport and transit facilities engineering, construction administration and management in several of the firm's foreign offices and in the Los Angeles and Irvine offices. He has been responsible for preparation of design, specifications and working drawings for building site work, airports, transportation facilities, utilities, water supply and wastewater disposal, and road networks. He has also conducted exploratory and feasibility studies for airfields, docks and piers, and commercial and industrial developments. For the past nine years, Mr. Hatch has engaged in construction management, construction contract administration and construction monitoring. In 1982 and 1983, he was project manager for construction management of a $500 million Ringget Malaysian Air Force facility near Kuala Lumpur. Since retumin�a, to Los Angeles in 1983, he has served as Director of Construction Services in the HNTB Los Angeles office. Since 1983 he has performed construction contract administration for the Irvine Hilton Hotel, the Hollywood Park Stadium expansion and the Los Angeles International Airport Runway 24L/6R reconstruction. During this period, he has represented lenders int he construction of numerous projects throughout Southern California. These lender projects include high-rise office buildings, hotels, restaurants, apartment buildings, industrial buildings, shopping malls, shopping centers, golf courses, club houses and single family housing developments. 34 Hatch, Page 2 Additional experience includes: • Civil Engineer Hdgs Air Force Base, Negoya, Japan. Design and reviewing consultant designs for U.S. Air Base facilities including systems, roads and buildings. • Civil Designer with architects, engineers, for Spanish bases in Madrid, Spain. Projects included ammunition storage, POL storage, dispensing systems, and miscellaneous air base facilities. • Chief Civil Engineer with Adrain Wilson Associates. Preparation of civil contract documents for all types of base support facilities for Clark Air Force Base, Subic Naval Base and Cubi Naval Air Station in the Philippines. Project Manager with Adrain Wilson Associates in Bangkok, Thailand. Prepared Master Plans for nine U.S./Thai air bases in Thailand. Prepared contract documents for U.S. air fields and air base facilities in Thailand and South Vietnam. • Project Manager with Adrain Wilson Associates in Seoul, Korea. Prepared contract documents for U.S. Air Force base support facilities. • Project Manager for joint -venture of Adrain Wilson Associates/Abaco Engineers on design and construction documents for U.S./Navy Trident Submarine support facilities at Bangor, Washington. Facilities included Explosives Handling Wharf, Refit Wharf, and Refit/Maintenance building. • Construction Manager for construction of Malaysian Air Force Transport Base at Subang, Malaysia. Facilities included aircraft parking apron and taxiways, maintenance hangers and shops, administrative and training buildings, enlisted and officer housing and mess halls, and all supporting utilities and roads. 35 PAUL F. JENSEN, P.E. Education Professional Registration Montana State University B.S. Civil Engineering, 1985 P.E. Montana #8347PE ! Professional Affiliations Institute of Transportation Engineers American Concrete Institute General Background Mr. Jensen is experienced in transportation planning and management issues including: traffic studies, site access studies and development of traffic assignment data, as well as the design of urban streets, highways, and access improvement projects. - mile of toll roads in Orange County. Preliminary level -of -service calculations for 68 s g y This included using the Highway Capacity Manual Software and local methods in determining system level -of -service impacts. i • Responsibilities for preparing level -of -service calculations, site generated traffic calculations, and site access impacts for intersection sizings for 3.5 miles of expressway frontage roads and ramps on US -183 from Burnet Road to 1-35 for the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. • Preparation of level -of -service calculations, cost estimates, and engineering design details for the 26 -mile northeast segment of the 82 -mile Austin Outer Loop feasibility study currently underway for the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. • Preparation of design alternates, cost estimates, level -of -service calculations, traffic modeling and analysis of air quality and noise impacts data for the Downtown Gateway Access Transportation Planning Study and Preliminary Enc ineeriny(T Study for the City of Austin Department of Transportation and Public Services. • Preparation of design alternates and cost estimates for the 32 -mile Engineering Feasibility Studv and Environmental Assessment for MoKan Boulevard for the MoKan Transportation Corporation. 36 i a I 0A i =1 I Jensen, ' Page 2 • Responsibilities for preparing engineering design details, traffic calculations, and Environmental Assessment documents for the I-35 West Frontage Road between US -81 and FM 2243 in Georgetown, Texas for a private real estate developer and the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. • Responsibilities for preparing engineering design details, traffic calculations, and Environmental Assessment documents for the IH 35 West Frontage Road and Bridge between SH 29 and FM 2338 in Georgetown, Texas for a private real estate developer and the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. • Before joining HNTB, he worked for the Montana Department of Highways. During this time he was responsible for developing alternate route location studies and developing environmental documents as established by FHWA and the Montana Department of Highways. • Assisted in the preliminary design of 26 miles tollway corridor in Orange County, i California. This to include design with Inter a h's Transportation Design Package (TDP). The design was based on a digital terrain model provided by the client from _..._� various mapping companies. • Assisted in developing construction plans for a major fully -directional interchange at Loop 1/US-183 in Austin Texas. • Developed the master plan design and detailed schematic drawings for US -183 form Loop 1 to I-35. This included developing traffic control and construction sequencing of this project. • Assisted in preparing contract drawings for the Montana Department of Highways on various locations in Montana. • Assisted in the construction engineering and drawing revisions of the Loop 1/US-183 interchange for the SDHPT. • Before joining HNTB, summer co-op work for Region 8 of FHWA as assistant project engineer. These duties included survey, material testing, and supervision of highway gild structural construction on various projects in Utah for the U.S. Department of the Interior. • Installed and supported 9 UNIX workstations and Intergraph VAX site. This is to include all software training and support for 30 on-site users. 37 Jensen, Page 3 i I i Coordinated aerial mapping data and ground control for 62 mile tollways in Orange County. This included electronic file transfers and checking the data for accuracy and ' specification compliance. Created Digital terrain models for 32 square miles of mapping in Orange County using Intergraph's Transportation Design Package. This is to include both arial and survey data. HNTB coordinator and trouble shooter for FHWA's R.D.S. program. i Working knowledge of the Highway Capacity Manual Software. f Use of other HNTB and other P.C. based and mainframe software. i Trained on various Intergraph products both on the UNIX workstations and VAX/VMS operating systems. These products to include: Inroads/TDP, Micro station/IGD S, SIF translations, DMRS database, IPLOT plotting system, Model View rendering package. I Created and distributed in-house training sessions on TDP, IGDS, and Iplot. 38 ECONOMICS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DAVID A. WILCOX, AICD, Senior Vice President Qualifications in Econo►nic Development and Military Base Reuse _ Mr. Wilcox has a background in the planning, programming, and management of regional economic develrTment, redevelopment, rehabilitation, and reinvestment projects for both public and private groups. He has implemented a variety of economic development assignments in the areas of budgeting, program development, organization and staffing recommendations, project management, and land marketing. Mr. Wilcox leads a team of ERA specialists who conduct public sector development feasibility analyses and provide plan implementation services to economic development agencies. Recent representative assignments have included: Economic Development Strategies • Fairbanks, Alaska, Development Authority Program and Ordinance Highland Lakes Systemwide Framework Plan for the Lower Colorado River Authority at Austin, Texas • Successful Enterprise Zone Designations for the City of Los Angeles and the City of Bakersfield with Kern County • Redevelopment Plan Formulation and Adoption for Six Communities Design of a Countywide Community Business Revitalization Program for 13 Commercial Areas in Los Angeles County Military Base Reuse • George Air Force Base Market Reuse Strategy and Overall Reuse Plan • Public/Private Ventures Feasibility Studies at Six Western U.S. Navy Bases • Impact of Cancellation of B-1 Bomber Contracts Focused Program Plans • Economic Development Elements of General Plans for Palmdale, Santa Clarita, and Bakersfield • City . Marketing Programs for the Cities of Pasadena, Poway, and West Hollywood Arizona Project Experience • Yuma Crossing Attractions Management Program Concept • City of Mesa "Water Farm" Conversion Plan Economics • Tucson Solar Village Design Charette for the Metropolitan Energy Commission Before his assignents with ERA, NJ-,. Wilcox served for eight years with the Community m Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles, where he was deputy administrator for the implementation of nine redevelopment and rehabilitation projects. In addition, Mr. Wilcox worked at the U.S. Bureau of the Budget, Executive Office of the President, in Washington, D.C., as a regional planner and management analyst. His responsibilities included agency reorganization plans and analyses of regional planning coordination. Mr. Wilcox's experience also includes the (caching of graduate community development planning courses at the University of Soutliern California, School of Urban and Regional Planning. He has served as a Peace Corps volunteer at the University of lfe in lbadan, Nigeria, where he lectured in government and history. lie is a long time member of the Board of Directors of Los Angeles Beautiful. Mr. Wilcox received a B.A. degree in political science and an M.A. degree in history from tale University of Michigan. lie also golds a Master of Regional Planning degree from the Harvard Graduate School of Design. He is a member of NAHRO, APA, and AICP. Mr. Wilcox has recently been elected to the Board of Directors of the National Council for Urban Economic Developnierit. John C. Loomis, Principal Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. Education: • Bachelor of Architecture, Syracuse University, 1970 • Bachelor of Arts, Syracuse University, 1969 Experience: • Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc., Newport Beach, CA October 1976 - Present • Rolly Pulaski, AIA and Associates, Newport Beach, CA September 1971 - October 1976 Licenses: • State of California - Registration #C8684 • State of Idaho - Registration # AR -1124 • NCARB # 211,566 Volunteer Services: • Amerige Building, City of Fullerton • Exploratory Learning Center • California Missions Quincentennial Preservation Project • City -of Santa Fe Springs, Home for the Homeless Project Appointments: • Getty Conservation Institute Seismic Adobe Committee • California Mission Quincentennial Advisory Committee • Orange County Cultural Resources Advisory Committee Affiliations: • Member of National Trust for Historic Preservation • Member of the Victorian Society in America • Member of the Smithsonian Institute Lectures: • Mission San Luis Rey, Summer Lecture Series, 1990 • California Mission Studies Association Conference, 1990 • El Paso Mission Studies Conference, 1990 • California Preservation Foundation Workshop, 1990 • League of California Cities, Downtown Revitalization, 1990 • American Planning Association, California Chapter, 1990 • Oceanside Historic Preservation Advisory Committee, 1990 • San Juan Capistrano Historical Society, 1990 • San Clemente Historical Society, 1990 • California Historic Preservation Conference, 1986, 1989 • "Historic Preservation as a Tool for Redevelopment", Southern California Institute of Architecture, 1985 • California Polytechnic University, Pomona • California State University, Long Beach • Saddleback Community College James C. Wilson Principal Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. Education: Bachelor of Architecture, University of California, Berkeley, 1971 Experience: • Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc., Newport Beach, CA October 1976 - Present • Rolly Pulaski, AIA and Associates, Newport Beach, CA September 1973 - October 1976 • Christopher R. Woljciechowski, AIA, Los Angeles, CA September 1971 - September 1973 Licenses: • State of California - Registration #C8994 • State of Hawaii - Registration # 4694 • National Council of Architectural Registration Boards - # 20,988 Volunteer Services: - Exploratory Learning Center, City of Santa Ana • Feasibility Study of Rehabilitating Victorian Residence for Civic Center Use, City of Hemet • Orange County Free Clinic Space Planning, City of Anaheim Appointments: • Discovery Museum of Orange County, Board of Directors Affiliations: - Member of National Trust for Historic Preservation • Member of Friends of Terra Cotta • Member of the Los. Angeles Conservancy • Former Chairman of the Historic Preservation Committee for the Orange County Chapter, American Institute of Architects • Member of National AIA Historic Resources Committee Lectures: • "Rehabilitation of the Third Street Mall", University of Southern California, 1985 • "Rehabilitation of The Samuel Kraemer Building" California Historic Preservation Conference, 1985 • "Old Town Irvine Rehablitation" Orange County AIA Lecture Series, 1988 Chip Gulley, Director of Design Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. Education California Polytechnic University, Pomona Department of Architecture, School of Environmental Design, 1975-1979 Licensed Architect State of California, #C019169 Experience Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. Newport Beach, CA. October 1982 to present Private Consultant, self-employed 1981-1982 Sham and Kent, Architects Newport Beach, CA 1980-1981 Robert Bender and Associates, Architects Newport Beach, CA 1977-1980 Design Projects Rancho Temecula Area Library: `Freedom through Knowledge" is the theme of this design of simple geometric shapes, with the feel of a village. The style is contemporary and timeless, not trendy. Light and air brought into the space create a feeling of soaring within a fully functional and practical public library. Perris Public Librarv: Designs of a new library based on local traditions of Spanish Colonial design, with a large open study area, in a pleasing scale, with interesting facades on all four sides. California Citrus State Historic Park, Riverside: Designs for Craftsman -style interpretive center, meeting center; innovative entry monument of a whimsical roadside citrus stand. Heritage Park, Santa Fe Springs: Designs for the reconstruction of an historic Spanish rancho with carriage barn, tank house, windmill, conservatory, interpretive center, catering kitchen, multi-purpose meeting/performance facility. Modieska Historic Park, Orange County: Designs for the exterior restoration and structural stabilization of 1888 residence by Stanford White, including new foundations. Clarke Estate Restoration, Santa Fe Springs: Designs for the interior and exterior restoration of a 1923 Mission Revival styled estate, designed in a Mission Revival style by architect Irving Gill. Randal W. Jackson -Principal Urban Designer/Landscape Architect Mr. Jackson brings over eighteen years of experience in the planning industry. He is a licensed Landscape Architect in the states of Arizona and California. He received his Bachelor of Landscape Architecture from Utah State University and has expanded his planning background through graduate work with the Pacific Urban Studies Center at the University of Hawaii. Recently Mr. Jackson was appointed by the Board of Supervisors for the County of Pima, Arizona to serve as Chairman on a 13 member Urban Design Commission. Mr. Jackson has a wide range of park and recreation planning and landscape architecture experience with both public and private concerns throughout the western and southwestern United States and the Pacific Basin. At The Planning Center, Mr. Jackson has been Principal -in -Charge of planning and design, as well as landscape architecture. He has been responsible for developing unique land use and community concepts for award winning communities built around and integrating open space, park and recreation systems. Projects he has been responsible for include: • Wood Ranch Specific Plan, Simi Valley - A Specific Plan and an EIR were prepared for this 3,748 -acre ranch, and was recently annexed into the City of Simi Valley. The Wood Ranch is currently being developed in four villages, which includes 42 acres of active public parks, 450 acres of open space parks, an 18 -hole championship golf course, approximately 4,000 residential dwelling units, recreation trails, and an 18 -acre specialty shopping center. In 1979, this project was awarded the National Association of Homebuilders Award for Sensible Growth. • Beacon Bill, Laguna Niguel - This 336 -acre project is located in the coastal foothills of Orange County and features mixed residential uses sited with ocean views, recreational amenities and extensive landscaping. Design guidelines were developed for the residential product types, covering architectural style, landscaping, fencing, signing, lighting, and building materials. A New England theme was adopted to keep consistent with the City of Dana Point's goals and objectives. • Fiesta Island, Mission Bay, San Diego - The Planning Center prepared a recreation plan and resource management program for Fiesta Island in Mission Bay, San Diego. Fiesta Island is the largest and only vacant island in Mission Bay. Several endangered species reside there, plus the demand for recreational facilities in Mission Bay is great. Recreational plans for the island included intense use areas, passive areas, preserve areas and a complex system of trails, bikeways and roadways. Randal W. Jackson -Principal Page 2 Aliso Greenbelt, Orange County - The Planning Center was responsible for the preparation of the Management and Operations Plan for significant recreational and resource area. The project consisted of 5,000 acres and is located in the County of Orange. The project implements three County Local Coastal Programs and a high priority coastal conservancy demonstration project. Prior to joining The Planning Center, Mr. Jackson resided in Hawaii where he served as Special Projects Manager to the Chairman of the Board of the Department of Land and Natural Resources. Under this appointment he developed the STATEWIDE TRAILS AND ACCESS WAY PROGRAM for the development, use and management of Hawaii's 2,000 miles of public trails. Additionally, he conducted a statewide inventory of natural resources which will be supportive of tourist and park development and designed the MAUNA KEA MANAGEMENT PLAN. This is a master plan for some 125 square miles of Hawaii's native landscape. Mr. Jackson served as the State of Hawaii recreation authority on the Natural Resources Policy Commission. Alfred C. B e ll Senior Advisor Mr. Bell experienced a wide variety of planning challenges during his 20 years with the County of Orange. This period was one of the most dynamic of any urban county in the nation and involved a unique combination of planning efforts. He was Chairman of the Consistency Assessment Team, County of Orange; General Plan Manager, County of Orange, Land Use and Transportation Planning; Initiator of the General Plan Modernization Program, County of Orange (long-range, mid-range and short-range plan with built-in consistency process). Mr. Bell came to this planning environment as a graduate from UCLA, moving rapidly up the levels of planning responsibility to create a research function within the County Planning Department. Experience in zoning, permit processing, preparation of community plans and highway coordination preceded this assignment. Subsequent activities included participation in the formulation of an ambitious comprehensive planning program, establishment and leadership of a unique policy team for analysis and formulation of planning and development policy, technical direction of the landmark evaluation of the proposed City of Irvine General Plan in Orange County and supervision of the early (1971- 72) growth policy analysis, Orange County Growth Policy and Development Strategy Study. With the establishment of the Environmental Management Agency, Mr. Bell assumed management of the General Planning Division, which was initially concerned with all general plan related activities, including the County's transportation planning function. Major projects during this period included a county -wide recreation needs analysis and regional park plan overhaul, technical support to the county -wide multi -modal transportation study, formulation and adoption of an innovative housing element, management of extensive County processing of significant precedent setting plans for the Irvine Coastal Area and Aliso Viejo. The latter analysis earned awards from both APA and NACO. Other planning programs in which Mr. Bell has had significant involvement include major circulation studies for both southeast and northeast Orange County, establishment and support of numerous citizen participation programs, and initiation of a three-phase General Plan Modernization Program for the County of Orange. Mr. Bell has brought to The Planning Center an extensive and diversified background in various kinds of planning projects, as well as management exposure during an era of considerable turmoil and strain among local governments in California. His most recent responsibilities included management of a staff of 35 with an annual budget in excess of one million dollars. Since joining The Planning Center he has been involved in a number of challenging planning assignments, several of which entailed direct involvement in citizen participation programs. Alfred C. Bell Pabe 2 He served as Project Manager and/or principal author of the following plans with unique consistency components: Paramount General Plan, La Cuesta Fontana Specific Plan, Harbor Corridor Specific Plan, The Chino Hills Specific Plan (21 member Advisory Committee), and City of Las Vegas General Plan Update (Advisory Committee of over 60. members). He is currently responsible for the County of Los Angeles General Plan Update and Streamlining Program and the Airport Site Selection Study for the County of Orange. Mr. Bell's extensive involvement in intergovernmental affairs included membership on committees for the Southern California Association of Governments, participation in the County Supervisors' Association of California Urban Development Strategy Task Force and numerous special purpose city/county coordinative efforts. He has served as lecturer in urban planning and development at both California State University, Fullerton and the University of California at Irvine. His educational work included coordination of two popular lecture series at UCI. Mr. Bell has been actively involved in speaking engagements on planning matters for the past 20 years. Mr. Bell is a member of the American Planning Association and was a charter member of the California Planning Roundtable. 0 Karen Gulley Policy Planner Ms. Gulley brings to The Planning Center an extensive background in policy planning and entitlement services. Her expertise is in the areas of community planning and processing, public policy research and analysis, fiscal impact analysis and transportation planning. Ms. Gulley received her Bachelor of Arts Degree in Economics from the University of California Santa Cruz and will receive her Masters degree in Urban and Regional Planning from California State Polytechnic University Pomona, upon completion of her thesis. She is an active member of the American Planning Association and Women's Transportation Seminar. As a Policy Planner with The Planning Center's Government Services and Policy Planning Team, Ms. Gulley is responsible for the coordination and preparation of general plans, specific plans and regional plans, as well as entitlement processing. She is currently assisting with the preparation of the City of Temecula General Plan. Ms. Gulley has been involved in the management and preparation of general plans, specific plans, transportation planning and road fee programs, park implementation plans and fiscal impact reports, including: • Managing and preparing a comprehensive general plan revision for the rapidly growing City of Lake Elsinore, which covers a 113 square mile city area and sphere of influence. Managing and preparing a specific plan and related issue papers for a proposed new town in San Benito County, in central California. • Providing entitlement services for the Dana Point Headlands, a residential and tourist commercial project, overlooking Dana Point Harbor and the Pacific Ocean. • Managing and preparing a Local Park Implementation Plan for Talega Valley, a 3,510 - acre planned community in the City of San Clemente. • Assisting in the preparation of a Regional Circulation Financing and Fee Program for the City of San Clemente. • Assisting in the preparation of the Talega Valley Specific Plan and related policy and development plans including infrastructure phasing and financing programs, circulation plans, market and fiscal analysis. She was extensively involved in the formulation and negotiation of project conditions of approval and other entitlement related activities for this project. Karen Gulley Page Z Managing and preparing fiscal impact reports for numerous projects including the Orangewood Corporate Centre in the City of Orange and the Broadwayraird Street Mall in the City of Santa Monica. Writing a monthly column entitled "The Sacramento Report" for the Southern California Growth Monitor a subscription newsletter for the planning and development community. Her articles focused on current state legislative activities concerning growth management, local and regional governance, transportation, and other issues. She continues to monitor transportation and growth issues in Southern California. Formdata�ResGW le.y Resume TERENCE W. AUSTIN Mr. Austin is co-founder of Austin -Foust Associates. Over the past twenty-five years, he has been involved in all aspects of transportation planning, directing projects that have ranged from small- scale circulation analyses to comprehensive multi -modal transportation studies. Examples of projects he has directed include the following: • Irvine Spectrum Traffic Analysis - A comprehensive study of land use and transportation in the 2,500 acre Irvine Spectrum area. • Anaheim Commercial/Recreational Area Circulation Management Study - The work in this study involved the analysis of specific transportation problems for this part of Orange County, and the development of short range and long range solutions. The study received a merit award from the Orange County Section of the American Planning Association. • Transportation Analysis Programs - Development of travel forecasting models and application of the forecast results for various cities and communities including Irvine, Tustin, Orange, Newport Beach, Santa Ana, San Clemente, Encinitas, and Oxnard. • Foothill Circulation Phasing Program - Development of a phasing and financing program for $250 million of roadway improvements in South Orange County. • Irvine Business Complex - Comprehensive analysis of circulation needs for this major activity center in Orange County, including the development of a special subarea traffic model. • Traffic analyses for citywide general plans in Orange County and other parts of California. Examples include Orange, Tustin, Irvine, Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, San Clemente, Encinitas, Oxnard, Valencia, and Santa Ana. • Regional traffic analyses including toll road feasibility and demand forecasting studies for transportation corridors. • Circulation phasing strategies for areas such as Valencia, Orange, Irvine Spectrum. San Clemente, and South Orange County. • EIR traffic analyses for a variety of projects in Southern California. Examples include Irvine Coastal Area, Irvine Spectrum, South Coast Metro Area, Santa Ana Arena, East Tustin, East Orange, and Anaheim Canyon. The following pages contain summaries of Mr. Austin's professional activities and project experience. SUMMARY OF EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES Education University of Canterbury, New Zealand B.E. (Civil Engineering) University of New South Wales, Australia M.S. (Transportation) University of Canterbury, New Zealand B.S. (Mathematics) University of California, Irvine M.S. (Administration, Graduate School of Management) Papers, Presentations, and Reports "An Estimation of Potential Peripheral Parking Usage for the Los Angeles CBC," Highway Research Record Number 444, 1973. "The Environmental Capacity Concept," Institute of Transportation Engineers, Western Region Meeting, 1973. "Aiding Bus Performance Through Traffic Operations Techniques," Transit Journal, American Public Transit Association; Fall, 1980. "Energy Use in Industry; The Potential for Capital Substitution," Graduate Thesis, University of California, Irvine; 1980. "What Can Managers Learn From Leadership Theories?", Supervisory Management, American Manazement Association; Julv, 1981. = "Traffic Impact Analysis", American Planning Association, California Conference, 1988. "Residential Street Design", American Public Works Conference; 1989. "Transportation Demand Management", American Planning Association, California Conference; - Responsible authorship for over 100 project reports on various transportation studies. - Guest speaker at various educational institutions and professional meetings and conferences on subjects related to transportation. SUNINIARY OF PROJECT EX'ERIENCE An overview of Mr. Austin's technical and project management background can be seen from the following list of representative projects. Comprehensive Transportation Planning Irvine Center Regional Traffic Analysis Anaheim Circulation and TransportStion Management Study South Lake Tahoe Highway 50 Corridor Study Copenhagen Regional Transportation Study London Transportation Study, Phase III Sonoma County Transportation Study City of Tustin General Plan Circulation City of Newport Beach General Plan Circulation City of Orange General Plan Circulation City of Encinitas General Plan Circulation City of Oxnard General Plan Circulation City of Irvine General Plan Circulation Valencia Area Traffic Analysis Transportation Analyses Santa Ana Transportation Corridor - Model Development and Application for Stage I Alternatives Analysis BART Travel Analysis for San Francisco Airport Expansion BART Travel Analysis for Oakland Airport Bay Area Traffic Forecasting for Analysis of Southern Crossing Proposal Denver Region Transportation Model Los Angeles Peripheral Parking Analysis Orange County Transportation Corridor Analysis Irvine Coast Circulation Plan Del Monte Forest Traffic Planning Study El Toro Area Planning Study Claremont Village Parking Irvine Spectrum Traffic Analysis Irvine Business Complex Traffic Analysis University Drive Deletion Study Gypsum Canyon Traffic Analysis South Coast Metro Area Traffic Analysis Special Studies Bay Area Airport System Study (Ground Transportation) Highway Air Quality Impact Study (Responsible for Transportation portion) The Effects on Highway Design, Location, and Operation on Photochemical Smog Formation (Responsible for Transportation portion) San Diego Growth Management Study (Responsible for Transportation portion) Santa Ana Arena Foothill Circulation and Phasing Study Newport Center Transit Center Facility Programming Orange County Transportation System Management San Bernardino County Transit Alternatives Analysis Riverside County Transit Alternatives Analysis Riverside Transportation Terminal Feasibility Study Riverside Service Alternatives and Route Restructuring Study Eastern Transportation Corridor Transition Study San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor South End Analysis San Clemente Traffic Shares Analysis ELDON M. GATH Program Director Planning and Natural Hazards Principal Geologist EDUCA► ION M.S., Geology, California State University at Los Angeles [Thesis pending: Tectonic geomorphology and neotectonics of the Whittier fault in southern California] B.S., Geology, University of Minnesota, Institute of Technology, 1977 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Registered Geologist: California, RG 4140, 1986 Engineering Geologist: California, EG 1292, 1986 PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Mr. Gath has 12 years of experience in the identification, investigation, and remediation of geologic hazards, involving land use planning, environmental assessments, field exploration and analysis, and presentation of findings. Mr. Gath has particular experience with the evaluation of active faults for construction site planning, the development of seismic safety programs and policies, and the determination of remediation alternatives for geologically sound site development» He is well versed in the principles behind development planning, and communicates closely with the design team to achieve a concept that best incorporates all of the site constraints, topographic, geologic, economic, or aesthetic into a viable and sound project. His particular field of research lies in the role that climate, geologic conditions, and man play on the evolution of the natural landscape. He has considerable experience with fault evaluation studies including work on the Pelican Hill, Peralta Hills, Whittier, Sierra Madre, Springville, Eagle, Main Street, Elsinore, Chino, Cucamonga, and Newport - Inglewood, Santa Monica faults, undertaken principally for seismic risk and development planning. Mr. Gath is a principal with Leighton and Associates, and is Principal Engineering Geologist for their Los Angeles East Office in Diamond Bar, California. PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Project Manager for the preparation of a new combined Seismic and Safety Element for the County of Los Angeles. The project necessitated the collection, collation, and analysis of geologic and cultural data for the entire County of Los Angeles, an area of over 4,000 square miles. The data was transcribed onto eight separate 1:100,000 -scale overlay sheets for use in hazard abatement analysis by the Department of Regional Planning. All supporting technical data and discussions as to the data sources, reliability, adequacy, and recommended programs for either current usage or future enhancement were compiled into a 3.50+ page Technical Report. In addition to the extensive data collection effort, the main focus of the project was to develop the Goals, Polk%es, and Programs for Los Angeles County to implement as part of their Five Year 0492 -1- LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ELDON M. GATH Seismic Hazards Reduction Program. The final preparation of the Element involved close coordination and meetings with the County Planning staff, including testimony before the County Planning Commission, several local public hearings, presentations to civic groups, and County Board of Supervisors' presentations prior to final adoption. Project Manager for the mapping compilation of all active and potentially active faults in the City of Los Angeles. The project was a portion of the update of the Seismic Safety Element of the General Plan, prepared for the Department of City Planning. From a thorough geologic data review, slip rates, fault lengths, maximum credible and probable earthquakes, and recurrence frequency, as currently known were compiled into a tabular format for reference by the city planners. • Principal in Charge and technical reviewer of the L&A prepared Safety Elements for the cities of Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, Burbank, and Culver City. •. Principal Geologist and Manager for the revision and updating of the Santa Monica Safety Element. The project involved a very close working relationship with several city departments, including engineering, planning, emergency services, and fire, to incorporate the current efforts of the City into the action programs of the new Safety Element. The study also resulted in the relocation and reclassification of the Santa Monica fault as an active seismic hazard. However, Earthquake Center, the City Council and planning staff were fully apprised of this new earthquake threat, two weeks before the SCEC press release was issued. Principal Geologist and Consultant to the City of Brea for their Vision Building project in planning a 7,000 -acre expansion to the City. The Sphere of Influence expansion area includes the active Whittier fault, several hundred landslides and oil wells, thousands of cubic yards of non - engineered earth fill, and large zones of active crude oil seepage (Brea). The purpose of the project was to involve the citizens of Brea, the property owners, potential land developers, oil field representatives, and a selected team of consultants (Core Team) in an intimate design process to master plan the future of Brea, involving field trips, weekend design charettes, and weekly meetings. • Project Manager for the preparation of the geology, topography, and geotechnical engineering sections of an EIR/EIS for the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles 2020 Plan. The proposed 2020 Plan would result in the expansion of the two port facilities by approximately 1,500 additional acres of new dredged landfill area. The project was particularly sensitive due to the potential presence of toxic materials within the harbor bottom sediments that were to provide the majority of the landfill materials. The EIR/EIS evaluated the conditions, the impacts, and the alternatives both avoidable and unavoidable. Four different expansion alternative concepts were evaluated, including the no project alternative. The findings of the EIRfEIS were instrumental in focusing the awareness of harbor officials onto the issue of seismic risk from an active fault [Palos Verdes Hills fault] causing surface rupture or deformation of the new landfill area, and onto the new issue of a "blind" fault underlying the entire harbor area [Torrance -Wilmington fault]. 0492 -2- & :'fi - I k LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES. INC. ELDON M. CATH Developed the geologic evaluation criteria for 56 alternative alignment segments of a proposed 45 -mile freeway project [Foothill Transportation Corridor] in Orange County, California. The project necessitated a review of existing geologic data, a field reconnaissance of all 170 miles of the alternative alignments, GIS computation of all collected data, and preparation of a geologic evaluation matrix for incorporation into the complete EIR document. Project was pr=-'!mted to the Orange County Board of Supervisors, the preferred alignment was selected, and detailed site investigations and initial construction is proceeding. Project Investigator for the 100 -square mile Ahmanson Ranch in Ventura County, California for the purpose of site characterization prior to ultimate land use decision malting. The project resulted in a series of maps presenting geologic hazards and conditions for planning evaluation. Follow up subsurface studies were instrumental in documenting that a portion of the site would be suitable for a Class H landfill, and that extensive slope stability problems would economically prohibit a desired low density development of the southern half of the ranch. • Project Director for the geologic, soils, and hydrologic portions of an EIR/EIS on the Firestone Boy Scout Reservation in Los Angeles County, California. Proposed land uses evaluated included two golf courses, a resort hotel complex, a perimeter cluster of medium rise condominiums, and a scrawling equestrian complex. Several large landslides were determined to be present on the margins of the project, alternative land uses and mitigation alternatives were discussed. • Project Manager for the geotechnical portion of the EIR for the proposed Ascot Sports Complex in eastern Los Angeles. The facility included several mixed -sport fields, an indoor complex, and an extensive amount of earthwork to achieve design grades. Abandoned oil wells and slope stability were the two dominant geotechnical impacts to the project. Project Manager for the geotechnical portion of the EIR for the proposed Powder Canyon Golf Course facility and private residential community in the La Hab: a Heights portion of the Puente Hills, Los Angeles County. The project involved moving over 10 million cubic yards of earth to achieve design grades. The dominant geotechnical impacts to the project were landslide mitigation and risk to offsite properties, deep fill subsidence, and the activity of faults throughout the project. Project Manager/Director for several detailed geologic studies of the Whittier fault in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Three miles of the fault, including detailed fault location and.slip history were evaluated for a $300 million residential development project. A study funded by the U.S. Geological Survey under the National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program was completed in 1990, the final report is underway, and preliminary results have indicated that the characteristic (maximum probable) earthquake for the Whittier fault should be increased from previous estimations, posing increased seismic risk concerns for a heavily urbanized, metropolitan area. • Principal Geologist for a detailed fault hazard assessment of the 700 -acre West Coyote Hills oil field for Chevron Land and Development. The site is a young anticlinal uplift in the eastern Los 0492 -3- LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC ELDON M. GATH Angeles Basin, immediately south of the Whittier fault. Due to the extensional tectonics of the uplifting fold, numerous secondary faults were created. The occurrence of a minor ground rupture along one of these small faults in 1968 prompted the State to include that fault in an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. For future development planning, all secondary faults within the development area were investigated as to their structural style, recency of activity, and risk to the development. A tectonic model of the area was developed to better characterize the pattern of faulting, and to enhance future risk predictive capabilities. Project Geologist for a fault hazard investigation within the Santa Fe Energy Olinda oil field in Brea. The purpose of the study was to comply with the provisions of the Alquist-Priolo Act by locating the Whittier fault and providing minimum setback limits to future development. The study involved logging over 50 trenches and road cut exposures within the 275 -acre site. The fault locations were used by the site planner to adjust the final design grades in such a way as to minimize the impact of the fault and fault setback zones. Project Manager/Director for the development of Fullerton Road through the Puente Hills of Los Angeles County. Detailed subsurface investigations were undertaken, several proposed alignments were reviewed, and remedial grading quantities calculated for each alignment. Massive landslides and generally weak bedrock materials were common along the entire project, and two active segments of the Whittier fault crossed the alignment corridor. The project involved the excavation of over 12 -million cubic yards of material to achieve final road grades. Close planning and interface was a requirement of the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. Meetings were held with the District Supervisor, Pete Schabarum, to keep him apprised of the project's progress. Project Manager/Reviewer for a 450 -acre hillside development project within the Puente Hills for Shea Homes. The project tool: over five years in the conceptual planning and design stages before final construction began in 1988. Extensive meetings and interaction with the County of Los Angeles was required due to the construction of two miles of Fullerton Road and one mile of Pathfinder Road, both under the review of the Department of Public Works. Numerous large landslides were investigated and analyzed for design buttresses, a 170 -foot deep fill was placed into an offsite canyon and monitored for secondary consolidation, and debris flow basins were sized and constructed within three drainages entering the site. The site was a former Shell oil field, necessitating the consideration of contaminated soils and the reabandonment of 12 oil wells. An interstate aviation fuel pipeline was relocated due to the grading, and the relocation plan was reviewed for geotechnical impacts. During canyon cleanout operations for Fullerton Road, both the north and south traces of the Whittier fault were exposed, and charcoal samples from the faulted alluvial sediments were sent for radiocarbon dating to provide valuable technical data on the slip history of the fault. Project Geologist and Manager for a fault hazard reassessment of the SierrZ. Madre fault through the proposed La Vina development of Southwest Diversified in the San Gabriel Mountains north of Altadena. The project involved the excavation of 15 trenches across the mapped trace of the Sierra Madre fault. Drs. Thomas Rockwell, Kerry Sieh, and Chap :,Ie Ruben of the Southern 0.492 -4 t. & 1 n ..L EiiJ1/r.. LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES INC. ELDON M. CATH California Earthquake Center were retained to review the trench exposures and conclusions of the investigation. Based upon sedimentary unit relationships and relative rates of soil development exposed in the trench excavations, the fault was determined to be inactive for a least the last 12-15,000 years and, therefore, does not pose physical development constraints. The study findings were successfully presented before the Los Angeles County Planning Commission. Project Geologist for a detailed fault investigation of the western end of the Las Posas Hills in Camarillo for the Spanish Hills Development Company. The development site 11as t)..Z;n elevated above the Ventura Basin by the active Springville fault, which has also created numerous smaller secondary faults trending through the proposed development. Utilizing two 30 -foot deep trench excavations, the study successfully located the Springville fault, and characterized the frequency and magnitude of activity. Based upon over 30 additional trenches, all but three of the secondary faults were determined to be inactive by use of fault zone mechanics. Development setback zones were provided for the active faults, and, by working closely with the site planners and engineers, a safe and viable land development plan was obtained. Project Manager for a 4 -parcel, 2,300 -acre development in the south Corona area. The project lies within the active Elsinore fault zone, and has severe development planning constraints due to faulting and massive landsliding. Extensive trenching studies were completed to locate the active traces of the fault, resulting in structural setbacks from six fault segments, and a determination that six other faults could be considered as inactive and pose no significant design constraints. The project is currently within the conceptual design stage, with design being based upon a geologic constraints and opportunities map prepared following the geotechnical investigation. • Project Geologist for a seismic risk evaluation of the New Madrid fault at a Department of Energy uranium ore processing facility in Metropolis, Illinois. The investigation probabilistic risk assessment, created smoothed site response spectra for differing risk levels, and assessed the probable structural performance of the facilities under the modeled seismic loading. 0.492 Project Geologist and Manager for a feasibility investigation to review mitigation options for active crude oil seeps (tar) and methane generation within the Santa Fe Energy Olinda oil field in Brea. The purpose of the study was to provide the land developer with preliminary remediation or planning alternatives of this naturally map the limits of the existing tar deposits, and to identify the structural geologic conditions within which the tar seeps are occurring. The volume of methane being produced was investigated with three gas collection boreholes. Several preliminary, mitigation measures were outlined. Project Manager for a 350 -acre hill -side development in the Puente Hills for The Lusk Company. The project has been in the tentative tract design stage since 1984, with numerous plan revisions proposed. A detailed subsurface investigation involving nearly 50 borings and 100 trenches was completed, followed by comprehensive geotechnical analysis of the 20 onsite landslides and proposed cut slope stability, and summarized into a cost benefit analysis of the various development alternatives. The design modifications have necessitated regular working meetings -S- ' ^.f .4 4U4 LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ELDON M. GATH between the consultant team, and several meetings with the County of Los Angeles Planning Commission. Major design efforts and innovative geotechnical remedial solutions were required to preserve historical oak trees at several localities on the site. Project Geologist for the "Area G" project by Hon Development in the Laguna Niguel area of southern Orange County. The 700 -acre parcel w..� investigated for both active faults and large landslide constraints. Three very large perimeter landslides were studied to determine their impact upon the proposed upslope development, and the impact of the future development on the landslide stability. Of particular concern was the reactivation of one of the landslides due to the presence of nearly 100 existing homes constructed on the landslide without recognition or stabilization of the slide. To isolate the proposed development from the slide and to increase the in situ stability of the residual slide mass, a 190 -foot deep by 1,000 -foot long shear key was constructed, an elaborate subdrainage system was designed, and several land use plans were reviewed. The project was mass graded into smaller tracts, involving over two years of earthwork and the. moving and compacting of nearly 20 million cubic yards of earth fill. Project Geologist for a geotechnical investigation and planning study to rehabilitate and develop a shale slag quarry in the Chino Hills. The site was a former burnt (expanded) shale facility where the bedrock shales were quarried, baked, and processed as light weight aggregate materials. After approximately 15 years of operation, the facility was closed and the site abandoned. As part of the redevelopment study, the site was explored using borehole and trench excavations, field geologic mapping of bedrock outcrops and mine waste and debris, and depths to ground water mapped as part of a feasibility study for onsite sewage disposal. Based upon the investigation, a land use plan was developed, and recommendations for the remediation of the developable portions of the site were presented. Project FMgrience for Landfills Field Geologist for the feasibility and design investigations of a proposed Class 2 landfill in the Verdugo Mountains of Los Angeles County. The project involved detailed field mapping of bedrock units, structural features, joint patterns, and ground water seeps. The study included Packer permeability testing of 12 boreholes, fault trenching and activity characterization, water sampling and laboratory testing, rock evaluation for cover material, seismicity assessment from the Verdugo and La Tuna Canyon faults, and design and quantification of clay liner material needs. The site was feasible from -a geologic perspective, however, access limitations, site hydrology, and neighborhood opposition combined to terminate the siting study. PROFESSIONAL HISTORY 1986 -Present: Chief Geologist, Leighton and Associates, Inc., Los Angeles County Office, Diamond Bar, California 1984-1986: Staff/Senior/Project Geologist, Leighton and Associates, Inc., Orange County Office, Imine, California 0492 l FtnmrnM AMn As;nrldrFS wr ELDON M. GATH 1980-1984: Staff Geologist, Pacific Soiis Engineering, Irvine, California 1979-1980: Field Technician, Irvine Soils Engineering, Irvine, California 1977-1979: Senior Laboratory Technician, Soil Testing Laboratory, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES • Earthquake Engineering Research Institute • Geological Society of America • Association of Engineering Geologists [Chairman of Southern California Section, 1990/91] • South Coast Geological Society [President, 1987] • International Committee for Natural Hazard Research • American Geophysical Union • American Association of Petroleum Geologists • National Geological Society • International Association of Engineering Geologists PUBLICATIONS A complete list of publications will be provided upon request. 0492 -7- a-W"�Iii W1 � .wC�•V�� 4 LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES. INC. ELDON M. CATH PUBLICATIONS Gath, E.M., 1983, Style of Faulting Interpreted from a Trenching Investigation, Glen Ivy South Fault, Riverside County, California; in Steller, D.L., Bryant, M., and Gath, E.M. (eds.), Geology of the Northern Elsinore Trough; South Coast Geological Society, Santa Ana, California, p. 105-114. Gath, E.M., 1983, Bishop Ash Exposed in a Road Cut Near Murrieta, California; in Steller, D.L., Bryant, M., and Gath, E.M. (eds.), Geology of the Northern Elsinore Trough; South Coast Geological Society, Santa Ana, California, p. 136-139. Gath, E.M., 1984, An Overview of Glacial Chronology for the Mammoth Lakes Regions Eastern Sierra Nevada, California; in Payne, C.M., Ruff, R.W., and Gath, E.M. (eds.), Geology of the Long Valley, Mono Craters; Mammoth Lakes Area, South Coast Geological Society, Santa Ana, California, p. 54-60. Gath, E.M., 1985, Brief Overview of the Tectonic Origin of the Southern California Continental Borderland; in Gath, E.M. and Bottoms, M.M. (eds.), Field Trip to Santa Catalina Island; South Coast Geological Society, Santa Ana, California, p. 9-15. Guptill, P.D., Ruff, R.W. and Gath, E.M., (eds.), . 1985, Geology of the Imperial Valley, California; South Coast Geological Society, Santa Ana, California, 225 p. Gath, E.M., 1987, Quaternary Lakes in the Owens River System; in Gath, E.M. and Others (eds.), Geology and Mineral Wealth of the Owens Valley Region, California; South Coast Geological Society, Santa Ana, California, p. 44-57. Clark, B.R., Zeiser, F.L., and Gath, E.M., 1986, Evidence for Determining Activity Level of the Pelican Hill Fault, Coastal Orange County, California (abs.); Program with Abstracts, Association of Engineering Geologists, p. 46. Leighton, F.B., Cann, L.R., Gath, E.M. and Bergmann, M.C., 1987, Fault Activity and Recurrence Interval of the Western Segment of the Whittier Fault, California; Final Technical Report to the U.S. Geological Survey, Contract No. 14-08-001-21368, dated August 14, 1987, by Leighton and Associates, Inc. Gath, E.M., Hansen, J.H., Clark, B.R., and Rockwell, T.K, 1987, The Whittier Fault in Southern California; Preliminary Results of Investigations (abs.); American Geophysical Union, EOS, Vol. 69, No. 16, p. 260. Rockwell, T.I ., Gath, E.M., and Cook, RD., 1988, Sense and Rate of Slip on the Whittier Fault Zone near Yorba Linda, California (abs.); Abstracts with Programs, Cordilleran Section, Geological Society of America, Vol. 20, No. 3, p. 224. Hansen, J.H., Gath, E.M., and Cook, KD., 1988, Geotechnical InvestiLTation of the Whittier Fault for Seismic Hazard and Structural Setback Determination, Yorba Linda, California (abs.); 00 LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC DON TERRES Project Geologist EDUCATION • M.A., Geological Science, University of California at Santa Barbara, California, 1984 • B.S., Geological Science, Principia College, Elsah, Illinois, 1981 • Field Geology Camp, Indiana University, Whitehall, Montana, 1980 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION • California, CEG 1362 • California, RG 4349 PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Mr. Terres has worked on a variety of projects including large hillside residential tract investigations, landfill studies, environmental impact reports, state and local roadway projects and commercial -. building investigations. These projects included geotechnical evaluation of complex landsliding, faulting, liquefaction, and compressible/collapsible soils. Mr. Terres' experience ranges from preliminary site feasibility studies to in -grading remedial construction supervision and distress/forensic investigations. His duties as a project manager included coordination of the project teams, close communications with clients, representatives of the client and governing agencies, and tracking and managing project finances. PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Project Geologist during EIR study phase for widening of the 91 Freeway from the 55 Freeway to the 605 Freeway. Expansion of the freeway will include addition of high - occupancy vehicle lanes. Design will necessitate construction of high retaining walls adjacent to existing developments. • Project Manager/Geologist responsible for geotechnical aspects of development for a 1,700 -acre Lomas San Juan Parcel in San Juan Capistrano. This involved preliminary and comprehensive geotechnical investigations for a large hillside residential complex including access roads. To date, construction of approximately 400 of the proposed 1,000 residential units has been completed. • Project Geologist during the construction phase of Ritz Cove Development, Laguna Niguel. A residential development which involved excavations below sea level for stabilization of a large coastal landslide complex. The site was constructed for development of approximately 100 multimillion dollar custom home sites. . O _. d 1Z /07.92 DON TERRES PROJECT EXPERIENCE (Continued) • Geologist for Mojave River Forks Dam, Hesperia, California. Included review of existing geologic and geotechnical reports regarding construction of th edam and wing dike for the purpose of determining the feasibility of converting the dam to a water storage facility. The scope of working also included detailed field mapping, subsurface trenching excavations and a geophysical seismic study to determine the location and activity of a potentially active fault which existed beneath the dam and wing dike. • Project Manager/Geologist during feasibility and construction phases for development of Area 20 and Edison's Serrano Substation in the City of Orange. Includes a geotechnical investigation for extending Imperial Highway through to Loma Street, and construction of approximately 800 residential units (approximately 250 units have been completed to date). This hillside area includes numerous landslides and a potentially active fault system which require extensive investigation. • Project Manager/Geologist for feasibility and construction phases of Country Village Areas A-4 and A-5, a hillside residential development in Laguna Niguel, California. Construction of this 450 -home development included mitigation of several complex landslides and cutting slopes adjacent to existing developments. Also included were construction of one 72 -inch - diameter storm drain and 39 -inch -diameter water main while expanding Alicia Parkway. • Project Geologist during construction of Pelican Hill Road, Segment B (Newport Coast Road). This major road in Orange County runs immediately adjacent to the Coyote Canyon Landfill. Geologic conditions necessitated redesign of slopes to prevent cutting into landfill trash and design of a complex subdrain system. This process included close coordination with multiple agencies including Integrated Waste Management Department. • Staff Geologist for geotechnical analysis of slope stability and seepage control studies, Coyote Canyon Landfill, California. Study included field mapping and subsurface exploration of areas within and adjacent to the landfill. Geotechnical analysis included recommendations for a seepage control system, foundation criteria for entry gates and cut slope design. PROFESSIONAL HISTORY 1988 -Present: Project Geologist, Leighton and Associates, Inc., Orange County Office, Irvine, California 1987-1988: Senior Geologist, Leighton and Associates, Inc., Orange County Office, Santa Ana, . California 1984-1986: Staff Geologist, Leighton and Associates, Inc., Orange County Office, Irvine, 1983: Teaching Assistant, University of California at Santa Barbara, California 1978-1981: Senior Laboratory Assistant, Principia College, Elsah, Illinois HONORS AND PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES Association of Engineering Geologists, Member `i CHEST EDUCATION • Ph.D., Civil Engineering, University of Washington, 1973 • B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Washington, 1963 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS • California, RCE 37940 PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY M. BURROUS, Ph.D. Associate Engineer Dr. Burrous has over 25 years experience in geotechnical research, investigation, analysis and design. His experience includes projects involving soil heave and settlement, slope stability, hillside grading, special foundation design, pipeline design and pavement design. Specific project experience includes: PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Geotechnical/materials study and report for Laguna Canyon Road to San Joaquin Hills Road Section, San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor, Orange County, California. • Geotechnical/materials study and report for Moulton Park -way to La Paz Road Interchange section, San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor, Orange County, California. • Widening of MacArthur Boulevard and Jamboree Road, Newport North, City of Newport Beach, California. • University Drive Extension, Cities of Newport Beach and Irvine, California. • Bonita Creek Bridge, City of Irvine, California. PROFESSIONAL HISTORY 1984 -Present: Associate Engineer, Leighton and Associates, Inc., Orange County Office, Irvine, California 1979-1984: Senior Geotechnical Engineer, R&M Consultants, Irvine, California, Houston, Texas and Anchorage, Alaska (Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Project) 1973-1979: Research Associate Professor and Director of Periglacial Laboratory Facilities, Quaternary Research Center, University of Washington 1963-1973: Research Associate, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC CHESTER M. BURROUS, Ph.D. Associate Engineer HONORS AND PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES • Member, Tau Beta Pi and Pi Mu Epsilon PUBLICATIONS A complete listing of Dr. Burrous' publications will be provided upon request. /+03.92 !► -i-- �• GARRY H. KEPES, REA PROJECT GEOLOGIST EDUCATION • B.S., Geology, Michigan State University, 1981 • Graduate Studies, Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS • Registered Environmental Assessor, California 1991 • Hazardous Materials Safety for Managers and Supervisors • Hazardous Waste Operations (Health and Safety) Course PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Mr. Kepes -has' over ten years of experience in subsurface and surficial geology, hydrogeology and hazardous waste investigations. His responsibilities include all phases of investigation including project management, historical reviews, property transfers, background report research and field protocol/coordination as field team leader/onsite safety officer. Working closely with numerous governmental agencies, he is well -versed in the regulations that encompass the hazardous waste industry. Mr. Kepes' professional experience also includes five years in petroleum hydrocarbon geological prospect generation and evaluation, appraisal of existing fields and wells, geophysics, well log and geologic well site supervision and analysis. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Kepes has been involved with numerous historical reviews, property transfers and site characterizations. Some of these projects include: •Mr. Kepes was the Project Manager for the historical overview and soil investigation for the Sepulveda Dominguez Storm Drain Improvement Program, Carson, California. • Mr. Kepes was the Project Manager for the preliminary site assessment, site characterization, and remediation at the 340± -acre Space Center Mira Loma, Mira Loma, California. • Historical review and preliminary investigation of possible surface and subsurface contamination on a 540 -acre parcel west of the BKK Landfill, West Covina, California. LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC GARRY H. KEPES, REA • Mr. Kepes has performed and managed projects relating to the general ground water quality and provided initial background data on the physical and chemical parameters of the ground water in the vicinity of the Port of Los Angeles, Berth 115 area, Berths 142 through 144, Berths 174 through 178 and Refiners Marketing Company in California; permitting for an underground tank removal/replacement, and monitoring system installation and drum investigation at the Port of Long Beach for the Port of Long Beach Harbor Planning and Building Department, City of Long Beach and the City of Long Beach Fire Department. • Investigator for contaminated soils and ground water from underground tanks/pipes and surface spills; underground monitoring tank programs; mitigation and remediation methods for fuel contaminated soils. • Investigator for surface impoundment with respect to the California Toxic Pits Cleanup Act (TPCA); site investigation for a solvent storage warehouse fire, abandoned wood preservative treatment (port area), and a hazardous waste transfer facility (port area). • Project Investigator for surface and subsurface investigations requiring the installation of ground water .monitoring wells at service stations and industrial/commercial sites; soil gas surveys; and surface impoundment sampling of liquids, sludge and sediments. PROFESSIONAL HISTORY 1991 -Present: Project Geologist, Leighton and Associates, Inc., Environmental Services Division, Irvine, California 1989-1991: Senior Geologist, Leighton and Associates, Inc., Environmental Services Division, Irvine, California 1987-19SS: Staff Geologist, Leighton and Associates, Inc., Los Angeles County Office, N alnut, California 1951-19S6: Geologist, Occidental Oil and Gas Company (Oxy, U.S.A.), Domestic Interior - Exploration and Production Division, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 1979-1951: University Representative/Geologist and Geological Research Assistant, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan HONORS AND PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES • Association of Ground Water Scientists and Engineers • Water Pollution Control Federation • American Association of Petroleum Geologists • Association of Hazardous Materials Professionals 46 -l-' i�\ MEHRDAD MAHDYIAR Senior Engineer/Seismologist EDUCATION Ph.D., Geophysics/Seismology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin M.S., Civil Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Shiraz, Iran PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Dr. Mandyiar has ten years of experience in earthquake and computational seismology and engineering numerical analysis. Projects include analysis of the aftershocks of the Petatlan, Mexico Earthquake of 1979 for the determination of regional attenuation properties and source mechanisms; the development of a theoretical model and computer codes for wave propagation in layered media for cross -hole seismic profiling (supported by European Energy Commission); seismic hazard, ground motion, and response spectral analysis in California and the Central United States; modification of a finite element code written for consolidation problems to model heat flow from underground nuclear waste repository (Sandia National Laboratory); and groundwater and surface -water modeling for geotechnical and environmental problems. His most recent work has been the development of a seismic knowledge based system for seismic ground motion analysis, the determination of the site-specific response spectra, and simulation of earthquake time history. PROJECT EXPERIENCE 0292 Responsible for all L&A earthquake related projects: Prepared a seismic knowledge based system for probabilistic and deterministic seismic ground motion analysis, stochastic simulation of earthquake time history based on 2-D fault rupture mechanisms, and determination of site-specific response spectra based on random vibration theory and strong motion time history. - Obtained the site-specific response spectra for various types of structures such as the 17 -story Anaheim All Suites Hotel and the Pelican Hill Road Bridge, both in Orange County. - Performed earthquake hazard analysis and determined the site-specific response spectra for tank farms and processing facilities of the Allied-Signal Chemical Plants in El Segundo, Califc.rnia and in Metropolis, Illinois. - Determined seismic design parameters for the performance analysis of a pile supported water pipeline for the Metropolitan Water District in Irvine, California. The analysis included generating a set of artificial earthquake time histories. 1 srrwrnu A Ain A ccnrrArcc iwr MEHRDAD MAHDYIAR Determined seismic design parameters for a portion of the Foothill Transportation Corridor. The results were utilized for the performance analysis of Upper Oso, Bee and Round Canyon dams which are adjacent to the corridor. Performed deterministic and probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the safety elements of the City of Burbank and City of Santa Monica. Performed seismic assessments for Chestnut Hill reservoir modifications and three other reservoirs proposed for construction in the Walnut Valley Water District, City of Walnut. • Conducted numerical analysis, using finite element modeling, for geotechnical and environmental problems. - Used the program MODFLOW, a finite difference groundwater flow program, for designing the dewatering trenches and the drainage system for a development project in Violin Canyon in Los Angeles, California. Used programs HEC -2, HEC -6, and SEDIMOTT for simulating flow, sedimentation, and scouring of the flooded Pyrite Channel in Riverside County, California due to past critical storms. - Used the programs SAC and FEADAM, finite element programs, to perform settlement and stress analysis for incremental fills at the site of the Commodore Bridge at the Port of Long Beach. • Worked on the design of a vertically oscillating seismic source and the related data processing software (Principia Mechanica). - Formulated and prepared codes for seismic wave propagation in layered medium for cross - hole seismic profiling, using the modified reflecti�"in, method. The project was supported by the European Energy Commission and the European Offshore Energy Supply. Analyzed the radiation impedance, stress distribution, and natural modes of a dowmhole verticall}, oscillating seismic tool, for the design purpose, using theoretical approach and boundary element technique. • Earthquake related research including studies on earthquake source mechanisms and regional attenuation properties, and development of moment related local magnitude scales (University of Wisconsin --Madison). Used a subset of the aftershocks of the Petatlan Earthquake to develop an empirical local moment magnitude scale for earthquakes in the region and to determine body and coda waves attenuation properties of the region. The same data set was used to study earthquakes source u mechanisms, and to characterize the local site response to gi ,,und motion. 0292 2 bkv LT 1 iIrUMM AMA AccnrlArec /Mr MEHRDAD MAHDYIAR HONORS AND PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES • National Science Foundation support (Ph.D. degree) • Iranian Atomic Organization scholarship (M.S. degree) • French government fellowship, Vichy, France • Top student graduate in Civil Engineering Department (B.S. degree) • University of Shiraz fellowship • American Geophysical Union • Seismological Society of America • Earthquake Engineering Research Institute PUBLICATIONS A compiete list of publications will be provided upon request. 0292 rd ► r-MMu Aun Accnrverrc wr Tf �� *W 000 ► r-MMu Aun Accnrverrc wr - MEHRDAD MAHMAR Formulated and prepared programs for determining coda and body wave seismic attenuation properties of earth volumes. • Formulated and completed modification of a finite element code, originally written for solving consolidation problems, to do thermally induced stress analysis (J.F.T. Agapito and Associates). - Performed numerical analysis for thermally induced stress distribution in a tunnel system due to nuclear waste canisters for Sandia National Laboratory (J.F.T. Agapito and Associates). • Deployment and operation of 12 3-compr­ nt digital seismographs in Hawaii and Mammoth Lakes area, California. In Hawaii, it was related to a geothermal project using volcanic tremors to define the magma chamber. In the Mammoth Lakes area, the purpose was to use natural events for seismic profiling. This included design and quality control of seismic arrays (University of Wisconsin --Madison). Gravity, Magnetic, and seismic survey of Baraboo, Wisconsin area to study the Baraboo Syncline (University of Wisconsin --Madison). Computer Experience Ten years of extensive complex scientific computer programming. Examples are a seismic expert syster:: L . Titten in C and Fortran), programs for synthesizing seismograms in layered medium (reflectivity method), stochastic simulation of artificial earthquake time history, operator interactive time picker and spectral analyzer of seismic body waves, and various sophisticated geophysical and engineering data processing. Experience includes the writing of programs in Fortran and C languages, and work with various computer systems such as Masscomp (Unix operating system), Prime, Microvax, and ATs. PROFESSIONAL HISTORY 1988 -Present: Engineer/Senior Seismologist, Leighton and Associates, Inc., Los Angeles County Office, Diamond Bar, California 1987-1988: Senior En`ineer, J.F.T. Agapito and Associates, Grand Junction, Colorado 1986-1987: Seismologist, (Employee/Consultant), Principia Mechanica, London, England 1981-1985: Research Assistant, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 1980-1981: Research Assistant, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 1972-1976: Construction Engineer, Stein Construction Company, Shiraz, Iran 0292 irmwrnw Awn AccnrlArrc air John R. "Jack" Easton President EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Forest Resources Management, 1985 Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA EXPERIENCE President Tierra Madre Consultants, Inc.: 1991- present Through eight years of experience It1r. Easton has developed a broad base of field and technical expertise in the disciplines of environmental consulting and natural resources man- agement. His recent experience in California includes wetlands delineation, mitigation design, and resource management planning. As President, Mr. Easton oversees major biological assessments with direct involvement in client -agency coordination, conflict resolution, and the integration of project and resource management objectives. Mr. Easton's knowledge of sensi- tive biological elements, applicable regulations, and development processes enable him to address resource conservation in the overall context of land use planning. As a Principal, Mr. Easton's responsibilities include directing operations and business functions of Tierra Madre Consultants. Natural Resources Specialist _.- RANPAC Engineering Corporation: 1990 - 1991 Mr. Easton was responsible for a variety of tasks including the collection and analysis of biological data, report preparation, coordination with clients and agencies, and project management. He conducted field surveys to delineate the extent of wetlands, determined potential impacts to wetlands, prepared applications for wetland alteration permits, designed mitigation plans, and acted as liaison between project proponents and regulatory agencies. Mr. Easton worked closely with RANPAC's staff of planners and engineers on land development projects involving sensitive biological resources. In this capacity, he. conducted biological assessments of project sites or coordinated subcontractors to prepare assessments. With the information generated from the assessments, tie provided direct input into project planning and design, contributing to the refinement of feasible projects which are compatible with biological resources. Natural Resources Specialist, Vice President Tierra Madre Consultants: 1987 - 1990 Mr. Easton perfornied tasks as both a biologist and project manager. He conducted field surveys and prepared biological assessment reports involving impact analysis and propos- al of mitigation measures. He also acted as a liaison between clientele and government agen- cies on projects requiring permitting under section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act, section 1603 of the California Fish and Game Code, and for projects requiring consultation under the Endangered Species Act. His responsibilities also included directing field crews on large projects. 1ti1r. Easton gained valuable knowledge of small niamnials through conducting a total of 9000 trap -nights and 5000 trap -days. Additionally, Mr. Easton conducted oak tree inventories on a variety of land development projects. John R. Easton Page two Digincering Aid Martin -Johnson Engineering: 1986 - 1987 Mr. Easton assisted a licensed land surveyor in boundary and constniction surveys. He calculated earthwork quantities, construction material quantities, and errors of closure. His re- sponsibilities included preparing land use applications as required under various land use regulations. Natural Resources Specialist Tierra Madre Consultants: 1985 - 1986 Mr. Easton conducted field monitoring to ensure compliance with the Environmental Protection Plan on the Southern California Edison Devers - Valley -Serrano transmission line project. He performed vertebrate and botanical surveys and prepared biological assessment reports involving impact analysis and proposal of mitigation measures. Forestry Aid California Department of Forestry: 1985 As a Forestry Aid Mr. Easton measured timber growth and collected yield data, as- sessed disease damage and identified resistant trees, assisted in forest boundary. survey, main- tained campgrounds and enforced campground regulations. Range Technician. Bureau of Land Management: 1983 - 1984 Mr. Easton worked on wildland fire suppression crews; participated in prescribed burn operations including planning, site preparation, ignition, control, and post -project monitoring; worked on spring, range, and wildlife habitat improvement projects. Forestry/Wildlife Aid Bureau of Land Management: 1983 Mr. Easton cruised and graded timber, inspected logged areas for mitigation compli- ance, monitored success of wildlife habitat improvement projects. CONSERVATION ORGANIZATIONS National Audubon Society World Wildlife Working Group CERTIFICATION Califorma Department of Irish and Game Scientific Collectors Permit #087.), State of California, Licensed Surveyor in Trainin^ Stephen J. Myers Field Biologist/Ornithologist EDUCATION Victor Valley College, Victorville, CA, 1986-1987 Mount San Jacinto College, San Jacinto, CA, 1974 California State University, Long Beach, CA, 1973 EXPERIENCE Field Biologist Tierra Madre Consultants, Inc.: 1987 - present Conducts field inventories of fauna and flora, performs literature reviews, prepares biological assessment reports emphasizing impact analysis, mitigation measures, and mitigation monitoring. Specializes in ornithological field studies including breeding bird and raptor surveys, and banding studies. Collected data for 1988, 1989, 1990, & 1991 U.S. Forest Service Riparian Bird Study in Angeles, Los Padres, San Bernardino, and Cleveland National Forests. Has performed focused surveys for rare and endangered species such as Stephens' kangaroo rat, Mohave ground squirrel, Least Bell's vireo, Gray vireo, Desert Tortoise, Cali- fornia Gnatcatcher and Santa Ana woolly star. In 1991, mist netted Cactus Wrens in morpho- logical study of subspecies in the San Gorgonio Pass. In 1990, conducted focused surveys for California Gnatcatcher for Metropolitan Water District Eastside Reservoir Study, as well as other focused surveys for this species. Qualified to perform Desert Tortoise surveys. Since 1987 has performed surveys to determine tortoise presence/absence for residential properties, pipelines and other public utili- ties projects. In 1990 and 1991, Mr. Myers attended the Desert Tortoise Council Symposium. Field Researcher Universitv of California. Riverside, Cooperative Extension: 1990 Mist netted and color banded 2'.2 breeding bird species within the coast live oak wood- land and coastal sage scrub in residential Orange County. Species banded included California Gnatcatcher and "coastal" Cactus Wren. Color banding was part of a study on the effects of urbanization on bird populations. Biological Technician United States Forest Service: 1987 - 1990 Performed biological inventories on San Bernardino National Forest, including focused surveys for rare and endangered species. Field Biologist Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History: 1986 - 1987 San Goraonio Pass Wind Resource Area: Monitored avian mortality and movements in commercial wind parks. San Jacinto Valley: Conducted research on avian mortality resulting from 500 kV transmission line collisions, including implementation of video tape monitoring system, in- field searches for mortalities, and diurnal bird censuses. Reviewed monitoring data and documented results. Solar One Experimental Power Plant, Daggett: Reviewed and transcribed data from study of avian mortality. _ZI-) Stephen J. Myers Page two Assistant Fish-Culturist Whitewater Trout Company: 1974 - 1986 Assisted in the production of rainbow trout. Duties included monitoring of fishes' health, feeding and general care, and delivery. Maintained vehicles and other equipment. Constructed and used nets and holding facilities commonly used in aquaculture. RELATED EXPERIENCE AND INDEPENDENT RESEARCH - Has extensive experience in the visual and auditory field identification of birds. Has spent thousands of hours birding in Southern California, Arizona, and Mexico since 1979. - Since June, 1988 has possessed bird banding permit # 21005-D, issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Prior to that, assisted bird -banding permittees in several research projects, gaining experience in the use of mist nets and other capture methods, and in the handling of raptors, shorebirds, and passerines. - Currently conducting independent research projects on Grasshopper Sparrows (Ammodramus savannarum) and Lark Sparrows (Chondestes grammacus) in Southern Califor- nia. Both are site -tenacity studies involving the USFWS-approved color marking of birds. - Participation in the San Bernardino County Breeding Bird Atlas, 1987 -present. Currently atlasing five nine square mile plots within the western Mojave Desert. Also serves as Area Leader for the western Mojave Desert region. Area Leader duties include review of field data and coordination of field observers. Conducts a censusing route in the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Breeding Bird Survey. This is an annual 25 mile, 50 stop bird census near Lucerne Valley, California. - On-going avian monitoring of the Mojave Riparian Forest along Mojave River near Victorville, California. - Has participated in National Audubon Society Christmas Bird Counts since 1979, and has compiled Morongo Valle-. California count since 1981. CONSERVATION ORGANIZATIONS Association of Field Ornithologists California Native Plant Society Cooper Ornithological Society National Audubon Society Western Bird -Banding Association Western Field Ornithologists CERTIFICATION California Department of Fish and Game Scientific Collectors Permit #0232 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bird Banding Permit #21005-D SEMINARS Ornithology Seminar, Laboratory of Ornithology, Cornell University, 1983. RESUME OF JOHN A. MINCH ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES CONSULTANT EDUCATION: Doctor of Philosophy from the University of California, Riverside, with a specialization in paleontology and stratigraphy, June 1972. B.A. and M.S. from San Diego State University with a specialization in paleontology and stratigraphy, June 1964 and June 1966 A.A. from Pasadena City College with a specialization in Geology, June 1960 Pasadena, Calif. SIGNIFICANT OCCUPATIONAL HISTORY Geological and Paleontological Consultant and President of John Minch and Associates, Inc.: 1976 to Present - Manage corporation which specializes in the Preparation of Environmental resource segments (geology, paleontology, biology, archaeology, historical) of EIR Reports, site investigations, site monitoring of grading operations and salvage operations and curation, preparation, and identification of fossils and artifacts in San Bernardino, Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, Riverside, and San Die(.yo counties. Professor of Geology, Saddleback College, Mission Viejo, California. 92692 1972 to Present - Main duties, Instruction in General Education and majors classes - Earth Science, Physical, Historical, Mineralogy, Environmental, Geology of California, Geology of Orange County, Geology Field Studies Geologic Consultant 1973-1974 - Chief Geologist and Engineering Geologist for a petroleum exploration and stratigraphic and paleontological project for Pemex in Baja California Sur. Program and budget management - Supervision and Co-ordination of field mapping. PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Geological Society of America, National and Pacific Sections of- Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists and American Association of Petroleum Geologists, San Diego Association of Geologists, Society of Vertebrate Paleontologists, Society of Malacologists CREDENTIALS Registered Geologist, State of California #3269 Certified Paleontologist, County of Orange Registered Environmental Assessor, State of California #REA-02478 SIGNIFICANT PROFESSIONAL SERVICE General Chairman of 491h(1974) and 591h(1984) Annual Conventions of the Pacific Sections of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Society of Exploration Geophysicists in San Diego. Member of Board of Trustees: Orange County Museum of Natural History. Chairman - Pal con to logical Advisory Committee: Orange County Natural History Foundation, 1952 - Present RESUME OF THOMAS A LESLIE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES CONSULTANT Mr. Leslie is a certified consulting biologist, certified consulting paleontologist and research biologist with a multidisciplinary expertise in the areas of resources management, wetland ecology, 404/1603 regulatory work, sensitive habitat and species, desert biology, paleontology, botany, zoology, and ornithology. He has conducted and managed numerous environmental resources projects involving baseline resource inventories, environmental impact assessments, environmental impact reports, environmental impact statements, sensitive species surveys and mitigation program design/implementation and CEQA mitigation plan development, CEQA 5 -year monitoring and reporting program development and implementation, pre -construction paleontological resource assessment surveys and in -grading paleontological monitoring, quarrying, salvage and taxonomic identification of paleontologic resources throughout Southern California. He is also an author of numerous scientific articles and recently coauthored a field guide to the geology and biology of Baja California; Mexico. RECENT PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Biological Resources 111'ork Mr. Leslie has conducted and/or managed and documented the following biological studies: o Sensitive bird species survey for the Orange County Transportation Corridor Agency on the El Toro Ridge Segment of the Foothill Transportation Corridor, North for California Department of Fish and Game Raptor Species of Special Concern. o Mule deer population/distribution studies in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. J o Biological Resources Assessment of it commercial site in Carson, California, for Carson Estate Company. o California gnatcatcher studies in Riverside County, California, for Kaufman & Broad. o Radiotelemetry studies of great blue herons in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. o Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Survey, Murrieta, California, for Kaufman & Broad. o California gnatcatcher studies in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. o Biological Resources Assessment in Palmdale, California, for GB Associates. o Biological Resources Assessment in Quail Valley, California, for Kaufman & Broad. o Dudleva multicaulis surreys in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. o Development of a Du(Ileva mrcldricaulis CEQA mitigation/relocation plan in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. o Biological P.esources Assessment of' The Dominguez Technology Center in Carson, California, for MB Gilbert Associates. o Western spadefoot toad surveys in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. o Development of a Western spadefoot toad CEQA mitigation plan in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. o Burrowing owl surveys in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. o Biological Resources Assessment the proposed Canyon heights Residential Tract in Riverside County, California, for MB Gilbert Associates. o Development of a Raptor Habitat Management Plan in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. o Palmer's grappling -hook surveys in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. o Braunton's milk -vetch surveys in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. o Development of a Braunton's milk -vetch CEQA mitigation plan in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. o Surveys and documentation to meet requirements of the City of Palmdale's Native Desert Vegetation Ordinance #692, for DL Simon Landscape Architecture. o Managed a 404/1603 Wetlands Delineation Study in East Orange, California, for the Irvine Company. o Surveys and documentation to meet requirements of the City of Palmdale's Native Desert Vegetation Ordinance #69?, for the proposed Pearblossom Commercial Center. o Mojave ground squirrel surveys in Palmdale, California, for GB Associates. o Processing a California Department of Irish and Game Stream Alteration Agreement in San Diego County for an unnamed tributary to Buena Vista Creek, for Mr. PA Harris, Developer/Builder. o Managed 'a 404/1603 Wetlands Delineation Study in LA County, for GB Associates. g'r`:. " " Paleontological Resources Work Mr. Leslie has conducted and/or supervised numerous pre -construction paleontological resource assessment surveys and in -grading paleontological monitoring, bedrock quarrying operations, salvage and taxonomic identification of paleontologic resources projects including the following: o El Toro Ridge Segment of the Foothill Transportation Corridor, North. o The 850 -acre Ahmanson Ranch site in Simi Valley, California, for Ultrasystems Inc. o The 435 -acre Bauer Ranch site in Anaheim Hills, California, for Kaufman & Broad. o The Kelley Ranch site in Carlsbad, California, for Kaufman & Broad. o The 1,100 -acre Gordon Ranch site in Chino Hills, California, for the Anden Company. o The Ranch, a 600 -acre rural residential development site in Chino Mills, California, for IST Family Homes. o The Irvine Coastal Development site in Corona Del Mar, California, for The Irvine Company. o The Las Brisas tracts in Murrieta, California, for the Anden Company. o The Pa_vne Ranch site in Chino Hills, California, for Ahmanson Development. o The Soquel Canyon Road tract in Chino Hills, California, for Ahmanson Development. o The 650 -acre Gordon Ranch site in Chino Hills, California, for the William Lyon Company. o. A commercial site in Carlsbad, California, for Madison Square Company. r,' M o The San Clemente Test Facility in San Clemente, California, for TRW. o A 1,000 -acre industrial park in Vista, California, for the City of Vista. o The Las Brisas tracts in Murrieta, California, for M. J. Brock Homes. o The California Oaks tracts in Rancho California, California, for M. J. Brock Homes. o The Chino Hills Road Assessment District project in Chino Hills, California, for San Bernardino Countv. o The California Oaks tracts in Murrieta, California, for the Ved Corporation. o The Anaheim Hills Project site in Orange, California, for Woodcrest Development of Orange County, Inc. o The Mission Santa Fe tracts in Oceanside, California, for the Ved Corporation. o The Hoag Hospital project site in Newport Beach, California, for the Allen Company. o Kulberg 1--lomes tract in Murrieta, California, for Reith Kulberg, President. o The Anaheim Hills site in Anaheim Hills, California, for the Baldwin Company. o The Woodcrest Development site in Anaheim Hills, California, for Woodcrest Development of Riverside, Inc. flrchaeological Studies Mr. Leslie has managed the following Archaeological/Historical studies: o Monitoring of hollow -stem drill cut materials of four test borings in San Juan Capistrano, California for ARCO. o Monitoring of water/sewer line excavation and construction in the City of San Diego. o Monitoring of water line excavation and construction in Pigeon Pass, California for the EMWD. PROFESSIONAL HISTORY John Minch_ and Associates Inc. - Environmental Resources Investigations (14 years) - 1975-1989: Staff Ecologist and 1991 to present: Principal. Michael Brandman Associates Inc. - 1990 (1 year): Section Manager, Special Projects -Biological Resources Management. Saddleback College - 1975 - Present (16 years): Full Professor of Botany, Zoology, Field Geology. Private Consultant - Biological Resources Environmental Consultant (since 1975). CREDENTIALS California State Certified f nvlronntental Assessor Alo. -042. Certified Biolo� ist: Counties of Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles; numerous cities in San Diego CouniN . Certified Biologist: Ecological Society of America. Certified Paleontologist: Counties of Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego and Los Angeles. California Community College Life time Teaching Credential: Botany California Community College Life time Teaching Credential: Zoology J A California Community College Life time Teaching Credential: Biology California Community College Life time Supervisory Credential EDUCATION o Post -graduate work (60+ semester units), Botany and Zoology, California State University at Fullerton and United States International University o M.S., Botany and Zoology, Brigham Young University: Suma Cum Laude o B.S., Botany/Zoology/Ecology, Brigham Young University: Suma Cum Laude o A.S., Riverside City College: Suma Cum Laude PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS o Alpha Gamma Sigma: CA Community College Honor Scholarship Society o American Ornithologists' Union o Association of Environmental Planners o California Native Grass Association o California Native Plant Society o California Teachers Association o Ecological Society of- America o National Educators Association o Outstanding )'oung '�1an of America, Javicees o Sicma Xi: the Research Societe of ?North ,America o The Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists o Utah Academy of Sciences, Arts,. and Letters o Utah Native Plant Society EXHIBIT "C" SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws applicable to its activities, in particular, 32 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 278, "Administrative Requirements for Assistance to State and Local Governments," Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars A-87, "Cost Principles for State and Local Governments," and A-128, "Audit Requirements for State and Local Governments," and "Drug -Free Workplace Requirements; Notice and Final Rule." 2. Consultant shall comply with all applicable terms of the Grant Agreement for the Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin contract (CL9213-9201) between the City of Tustin and the Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA) of the Department of Defense attached as Exhibit F. Additionally, the Grantee shall comply with the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States Marine Corps and the City of Tustin concerning the project (attached to the Grant Agreement and also included in Consultants' Proposal). 3. The Consultant shall not release to the public or press any information regarding the purpose/scope of services to be accomplished or data specific to any project(s) and/or delivery order issued under this Agreement without prior authorization of the Contract Officer. All such information is considered CONFIDENTIAL. All such inquiries made of the Consultant shall be immediately referred to the Contract Officer. 4. Consultant shall present to City certificates of insurance and endorsement forms verifying that the Consultant has the insurance as required by this agreement. Said forms shall be reviewed and approved by the office of the City Attorney of the City of Tustin. A Certificate of Insurance Form is attached. 5. If the Contract Officer determines that a product deliverable is unacceptable, either before or after a draft or final draft is issued, because it did not conform to the specifications set forth in the Agreement, the Consultant shall submit a revised report or product at Consultants' expense. 6. The Scope of Work requires that monthly progress reports be submitted by Consultant. Said reports shall be submitted by the 10th of each month during the project life. At a minimum, these reports shall specify the period concerned, tasks completed, tasks underway, percent of project completed, problems and strategies to solve any timing delays, tasks of next review period or phase, expenditures to date and an advance estimate of expected expenditures for the next progress report period. All progress reports must be signed by the Consultant. 7. Consultant shall utilize those professional personnel and sub - consultants to perform services required under this Agreement as identified in Consultants' Proposal. No substitution shall be made without the advance written approval of the Contract officer, after review of the proposed replacement's experience and qualifications with a written explanation of the necessity for the change. No increase in the compensation or reimbursable salary rates will be allowed when personnel or firm substitutions are authorized. 8. Consultant shall remove and replace project personnel or subconsultants assigned to project who do not perform assigned duties in a manner satisfactory to the Contract Officer. 9. Consultant shall be required to meet with Contract Officer of City of Tustin, Project Committee or Base Closure Task Force as determined by the Contract Officer to be necessary or desireable to discuss progress on the Scope of Work at Contract Officer's direction. 10. Field Investigations are believed necessary. The Consultant shall obtain all necessary field data and make site investigations and studies necessary to the proper accomplishment of the work required under this contract. 11. In performing the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall adhere to described requests of the following except as such requirements may be modified by the Scope of Work. A. NEPA B. CEQA C. Specific Plan Law D. Special instructions or criteria issued by the Contract Officer. E. Applicable Marine Corps and Navy Planning criteria. CITY OF TUSTIN CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE AND DESIGNATION OF NAMED ADDITIONAL INSURED NO MODIFICATIONS OR ADDITIONS MAY BE MADE TO THIS FORM CITY OF TUSTIN PROJECT: P.O. Box 3539 Tustin, CA 92681-3539 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE NAME AND ADDRESS OF INSURED CONTRACTOR: Company Letter A Company Letter B Company Letter C NAME AND ADDRESS OF INSURANCE AGENCY: Company Letter D Company Letter E [-company Letter F This is to certify that the policies of insurance listed below have been issued to the insured name above, are in force at this time, that the City of Tustin is a named additional insured thereon as respects claims arising in connection with the hereinabove named Project and that such insurance shall be primary with respect to any other insurance in force procured by the City of Tustin. Co. Policy Policy Ltr I Type of Insurance Policy Number Effective Date Expiration Date All Limits in Thousands GENERAL LIABILITY General Aggregate $ [ ] Commercial General Liability Prods -Comp/ $ [ ] Claims Made ( ] OCC. Ops Agg. Pers. & Advg. Injury $ (] Owner's & Contractors' Protective Each Occurrence $ Fire Damage $ (] (] (Any One Fire) Medical Expense S (Any One Person) AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY CSL $ [ ] Any Auto [ ) All Owned Autos Bodily Injury $ [ I Scheduled Autos (Per Person) Bodily Injury $ (j Hired Autos [ J Non -Owned Autos (Per Occurrence) [ ] Garage Liability [) Property 1 $ EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE [ ] Umbrella Form S $ [ ) Other Than Umbrella Form WORKERS COMPENSATION ' STATUTORY AND EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY $ Each Accident $ Disease -Policy Limit $ Disease -Each Employee OTHER Description of Operations/Locations[Vehicles Special Items It is certified that a waiver of subrogation is hereby issued to the City of Tustin as pertains to the terms of all Workers Compensation insurance. The issuing company will give thirty (30) days written notice to the City of Tustin prior to modification or cancellation. DATE ISSUED: Authorized Representative of the above-named insurance companylies) EXHIBIT D COMPENSATION 1. Compensation shall be for the actual time of work performed and material costs expended by Consultant and may not exceed $800,000. 2. Progress payments will be made monthly based on services provided and actual costs incurred. All requests for payment shall be based on actual time and materials specifically related to identified tasks in the Scope of Work. a. The Consultant shall indicate on all monthly invoices the tasks being billed against, the original budget amount for that task, the amount billed to date and percentage of completion. b. The Consultant may bill up to the maximum projected budget through the tasks completed less 10%. The retention amount will be paid to consultant after the Contract Officer has evaluated the consultant's performance and made a determination that requirements of the Scope of Work for individual tasks have been satisfactorily fulfilled. C. Each invoice shall also indicate the actual hours worked, the billing rate, personnel classification, hourly billable rate and the amount of fees being billed for all consultant personnel. d. All hours charged to the project shall be supported at consultant's office by detailed time sheets. e. All invoicing shall be based on actual hours worked by an individual times the fixed hourly rate for that individual and their corresponding firms as specified by the Consultants' Proposal. Actual hours shall be hours spent on assigned project tasks. Travel time to and from the City's offices and to and from the Consultants' offices shall not be billable. 3. Records for all billings, payroll, consultant fees and direct reimbursable expenses pertaining to the project shall be maintained on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles and shall be avail ble for inspection by the City or the City's representative t mutually convenient times. 4. Any special costs for necessary services such as field surveys and investigations, excavation, special reproduction, computer .data preparation and computing shall be included in the maximum contract price of $800,000. 5. Approved change orders shall be compensated based on the hourly rates shown in Exhibit B and each maximum amount previously agreed to in writing by Consultant. EXHIBIT E SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE 1. Pursuant to Section 3.2 of this Agreement, Consultant shall make all reasonable and conscientious efforts to comply with the 18 month schedule specified in Exhibit A. The Consultant shall prepare for approval of the City a list of all identified tasks, actions and procedures to meet this schedule and delineate all divisions of responsibility and anticipated dates for deliverable products within 30 days of approval of this Agreement. 2. The Contract Officer may provide reasonable time extensions to the schedule of performance to the Consultant based upon written requests made by the Consultant when such requests are reviewed and recommended for approval by the Project Committee, are consistent with provisions contained in Exhibit F and are approved in writing by the Contract Officer. EXHIBIT F GRANT AGREEMENT FOR MARINE CORPS AIR STATION TUSTIN CONTRACTS CL9213-92-01 This agreement is between the City of Tustin, California, the Grantee, and the Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA), the Grantor, on behalf of the Department of Defense. The Grantee will undertake base reuse planning, as described in the Application for Federal Assistance, at an estimated cost of $897,730. The Grantee and local government shall assure that $147,730 shall be contributed as cash or in-kind. The Grantor agrees to grant to the Grantee a sum not to exceed $750,000, subject to the terms and conditions established by the Grantor in this Grant Agreement. The grant period is from November 1, 1991 through January 31, 1994. Eligible costs incurred between November 1, 1991 and the date this grant agreement is executed are allowable and reimbursable. Any grant funds actually advanced and not needed for grant purposes shall be returned immediately to the Grantor. The Grantor may terminate the grant in whole, or in part, at any time before the date of completion, for the convenience of the Government or whenever it is determined that the Grantee has failed to comply with the conditions of the grant. 1. compliance by the Grantee A. Overall Compliance: The Grantee and any consultant/contractor employed under this grant shall comply with all applicable Federal, state, and local laws applicable to its activities, in particular, 32 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 278, "Administrative Requirements for Assistance to State and Local Governments," Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars A-87, "Cost Principles for State and Local Governments," and A-128, "Audit Requirements for State and Local Governments," and "Drug -Free Workplace Requirements; Notice and Final Rule." B. Hatch Act: Grantee is advised that its employees may be subject to the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508). If doubt exists in particular cases, the Grantee should contact the City Attorney. C. Grant Terms and Conditions: The Grantee and any consultant/contractor employed under this grant shall comply with the terms of the grant award and this Grant Agreement. Additionally, the Grantee shall comply with the attached Memorandum of Understanding between the United States Marine Corps and the City of Tustin concerning the preparation of a Joint Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the disposal and use of Marine Corps Air Station Tustin. The decision of the Grantor in interpreting the Terms and Conditions of this grant shall be final. 2. Activities Prohibited A. Duplication of Work: The purpose and scope of work for which this grant is made shall not duplicate programs for which monies have been received, are committed, or are applied for from other sources, public or private, except as noted in the attached Memorandum of Understanding. Upon request of the Grantor, the Grantee shall submit full infor- mation about related programs that will be initiated within the grant period. B. Other Funding Sources: The Grantor's funds budgeted or granted for this program shall not be used to replace any financial support previously provided or assured from any other source. C. Funds for Attorney/Consultant Fees: The Grantee hereby agrees that no funds made available from this grant shall be used, directly or indirectly, for paying attorneys' or consultants' fees in connection with securing grants or other _h. services provided by the Grantor, for example, preparing the application for this assistance. However, attorneys' and consultants' fees incurred for meeting grant requirements may be eligible project costs and may be paid out of funds made available from this grant provided such costs are otherwise eligible. 3. Personnel Approvals The Grantor reserves the right to approve or disapprove the selection of professional level employees of the Grantee. Resumes, in sufficient detail to reveal the experi- ence, education, and other general and special qualifications for the position, must be submitted to the Grantor, upon request, for consent prior to employment of a candidate. 4. Use of Consultants/Contractors A. Procurement of consultant or contractor services shall be in accordance with all standards and procedures set forth in 32 CFR 278. The following terms, which are drawn from the Common Rule, are intended merely to highlight some of these standards and are therefore not inclusive. B. The standards set forth in the Common Rule, as applicable, do not relieve the Grantee of the contractual responsibilities arising under its contracts. The Grantee is the responsible authority, without recourse to the Grantor regarding the settlement and satisfaction of all contractual and administrative issues arising out of procurements entered into, in support of the grant. C. All procurement transactions, regardless of whether negotiated or advertised and without regard to dollar value, shall be conducted in a manner that provides maximum open and free competition. D. All actions to engage expert, technical, or legal services that are expected to exceed $5,000 shall be referred to the Grantor for prior approval. E. All deliverables furnished the Grantee through consultant or contractor services shall be referred to the Grantor for review and acceptance. F. The Grantee shall maintain a code or standards of conduct. which shall govern the performance of its officers, employees, or agents in contracting with and expending Federal grant funds. The Grantee's officers, employees, or agents shall neither solicit.nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractor or potential contractors. To the extent permissible by state or local law, rules, or regulations, such standards shall provide for penalties, sanctions, or other disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by either the Grantee's officers, employees, or agents, or by contractors or their guests. 5. Separate Bank/Fund Accounts A. The Grantee is not required to establish a separate bank account but may do so. The Grantee, however, must establish a separate fund account that identifies the application of grant funds. Other considerations, such as Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation coverage, shall be in accordance with the provisions of 32 CFR 278. B. Interest earned on Federal funds shall be reported to the Grantor and used to reduce the Federal share of this grant by that amount. 6. Grant Payments A. Grant payments will be made by Treasury checks. B. Grant payments will be contingent upon acceptance of the Grantee's quarterly reports as described in paragraph 9 of this agreement. C. When grant payments are cash advances, they shall be quarterly or as needed. The amount requested will be limited to that actually required for the period. D. A Standard Form (SF) 270, "Request for Advance or Reimbursement," shall be submitted when requesting funds. E. All financial information on the SF 270 shall be shown as: Column (a) --Contracts. F. Ten percent of the grant amount shall be withheld subject to the acceptance of the closeout report. G. Any grant funds actually advanced and not needed for grant purposes shall be returned immediately to the Grantor. 7. Expenses and Purchases Excluded A. Funds budgeted under this grant may not be used for entertainment expenses, nor for professional dues and/or subscriptions that are not related to the purpose of the grant. B. Funds budgeted under this grant may not be used for capital assets, such as the purchase of vehicles, improvements and renovation of space, and repair and maintenance of privately owned vehicles. 8. Grantee Contributions Contributions by the Grantee, whether in cash or in-kind, are expected to be paid out at the same general rate as Federal funds. In any event, one-half of the Grantee's share of costs shall be available, incurred, or expended by the time one-half of the Federal share has been disbursed. 9. Grantee Reporting A. Progress Reports on Grant Activities: Quarterly progress reports shall be submitted to the Director, OEA. The first progress report is due November 1, 1992 and 90 days thereafter for subsequent reports. The reports will contain information on the following: (1) A comparison of actual accomplishments to the objectives established for the period. (2) The reasons for slippage if established objectives were not met. (3) Additional pertinent information when appropriate. B. Progress Reports on Studies: Draft reports provided to the Grantee by its contractor/consultant, as. required in the contract, will be furnished to the Grantor for review and acceptance. C. Budget: Grantee shall submit an accounting of actual and projected quarterly expenditures by the budget line items approved in the grant. D. Final Reports: (1) A final "Financial Status Report," SF 269, shall be submitted to the Grantor 90 days after the grant completion date. (2) A final Progress Report covering the grant period shall be submitted to the Grantor 90 days after the grant completion date. (3) Copies of final reports/studies furnished to the Grantee by its contractor/consultant shall be submitted to the Grantee no later than 90 days after the grant completion date. 10. Contractor Deliverables A. A disclaimer statement will appear on the title page of the study for the Marine Corps Air Station Tustin. It will read: "This study was prepared under contract with the City of Tustin, with financial support from the U.S. Marine Corps and grant administration services from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content reflects the views of the City of Tustin, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Marine Corps or the Office of. Economic Adjustment." B. The contractor identification will appear on the title page of the study funded by this grant. C. The final study will be submitted in one unbound, reproducible original and four bound copies. The document will be dated the month and year that it is submitted to the Grantor. 11. Audits A. Grantee shall furnish a sufficient number of copies as defined in OMB Circular A-128 of the audit report to the designated cognizant Federal audit agency. B. If the grantee has not been designated a cognizant Federal audit agency, the audit report should be forwarded to: Mr. Michael Hill Assistant Inspector General for Audit Policy & Oversight Department of Defense 400 Army Navy Drive Arlington, VA 22202 C. Grantee shall advise the Grantor in writing when the audit report is furnished to the cognizant Federal audit agency or the Department of Defense. D. The Department of Defense reserves the right to conduct an independent follow-up audit. THE TERMS OF THIS GRANT ARE AGREED TO BY: Je nne B. Fites Acting Director Date Office of Economic Adjustment Christine A. Shingle Assistant City Manag City of Tustin G� William A. Huston City Manager City of Tustin Date Date MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING A JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND A REUSE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR MARINE CORPS AIR STATION, TUSTIN This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is entered into by and between the City of Tustin ("City") and the United States of America by and through the Commander, Marine Corps Air Bases, Western Area ("USMCII) respecting the following matters. RECITALS A. Pursuant to Public Law 101-510, the Defense Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Marine Corps Air Station Tustin will be closed no later than July 1997. B. The USMC intends to dispose of a substantial portion of the real property that now constitutes the Air Station while retaining other portions*to support Marine Corps Air Station E1 Toro. For purposes of this agreement "Air Station" shall mean Marine Corps Air Station Tustin encompassing the existing boundaries of that installation; "Reuse Area" shall mean those. areas of the Air Station planned for disposal by the USMC; and "Retained Area" shall mean those areas of the Air Station to be retained for continued use by the USMC after closure. C. The City and USMC desire to meet their respective obligations under California and Federal law to assess the potential environmental impacts of disposal, reuse, and retention of various portions of the Air Station by preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS). This cooperative effort is consistent with the Department of Defense strategy for disposal of base closure property and will promote intergovernmental coordination at the local and federal levels. D. For the purposes of the EIR/EIS, "Project" shall mean the USMC' s disposal of the Reuse Area and continued use of the Retained Area after closing the Air Station and the City's preparation and adoption of a Specific Plan for the Reuse Area. E. The City and USMC believe that the City's preparation and adoption of a Specific Plan for the Reuse Area at the same time that both parties produce a joint EIR/EIS will optimize the value of the Reuse Area and assist the City in a timely economic adjustment to the Air Station's closure. F. The City and USMC wish to ensure preparation of an EIR/EIS for the disposal and reuse of the Air Station that includes all relevant information and analysis before independently acting on the Project. G. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), its implementing regulations, and Article 14 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) permit and encourage joint Federal and State processes for environmental compliance to reduce duplication of effort, expense, and paperwork whenever possible. Council on Environmental Quality regulations, 40 C.F.R. Section 1506.2, and CEQA Guidelines, Section 15226, provide for joint federal and state planning processes, environmental research and studies, public hearings, and environmental assessment. Those regulations also provide that in such cases, Federal agencies and State or local agencies shall be joint lead agencies for purposes of a joint EIR/EIS. H. The City, with the cooperation of the USMC, has requested approval of a $750,000 grant from the Department of Defense Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA) to support preparation of a joint EIR/EIS for the Project, with the expectation that with USMC consultation and participation, the resulting study will satisfy EIS requirements of NEPA, and applicable Federal, Department of Navy and United States Marine Corps regulations and directives; enhance redevelopment opportunities for the Reuse Area and eventually maximize revenue into the Base Closure Account. I. The City has agreed to undertake the preparation of the joint EIR/EIS and Specific Plan for the Reuse Area within an expedited timeframe with the understanding that the environmental evaluation of the Project will cost approximately $800,000 and that approval of a $750,000 grant request from the OEA is anticipated. J. A USMC representative participated in the screening process for selecting a consultant to prepare the EIR/EIS for the Project and determined that all the finalists from which the City will select a contract consultant are qualified under federal standards. MUTUAL UNDERSTANDINGS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and other considerations herein set forth, it is mutually understood that: 1. A joint EIR/EIS shall be prepared on the Project in accordance with NEPA and CEQA and all applicable Federal, Department of Navy and United States Marine Corps regulations and directives. The Scope of Work is attached as Exhibit "A". 2. The City and the USMC shall be joint lead agencies, as provided for in 40 C.F.R. Section 1501.5(b) and Section 15226 of the CEQA Guidelines. They shall endeavor in good faith to concur in a preferred reuse alternative which will (a) be compatible with the USMC's use of the Retained Area, (b) not interfere with any environmental remediation which the USMC is required to accomplish, and (c) provide timely economic �- adjustment for the City. 2 3. To the maximum extent practicable under existing laws and regulations, both parties agree to share relevant information. As input to the EIR/EIS and planning for the Specific Plan for the Reuse Area, the USMC shall make reasonable efforts to provide in a timely manner information identified to be provided by the USMC in Exhibit A. 4. PROJECT REPRESENTATIVES AND THEIR DUTIES A. In the preparation of the EIR/EIS, the City and the USMC shall be represented by the following project representatives or officers referred to as the "Project Committee" City of Tustin Christine Shingleton Assistant City Manager 15222 Del Amo Avenue Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 544-8890 X 253 Dana Ogdon Senior Planner 15222 Del Amo Avenue Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 544-8890 X 291 USMC Ann Dotson Urban Planner MCAS E1 Toro (AQ) Santa Ana, CA 92709 (714) 726-3202 Linda Howard Deputy Staff Civil Engineer MCAS E1 Toro (JA) Santa Ana, CAS 92709 (714) 726-6608 B. The successful preparation of the joint EIR/EIS will require full communication between the parties. IZ. shall be the duty of the Project Committee to ensure close consultation throughout the document preparation and review process. Members of the Project Committee shall keep each other advised of developments affecting the preparation of the EIR/EIS. Meetings of the Project Committee shall be held as needed to ensure close consultations including discussion of issues raised by any Federal, State, regional or local agency and -the approach to resolving these issues. C. Both parties recognize the benefits of retaining the members named above on the Project Committee; nevertheless, each party reserves the right to replace its members as needed. The City and USMC shall provide each other written notification of substitute members with their titles, addresses, and telephone numbers. D. The Project Committee shall review and agree on the following: 3 1) Detailed work tasks and scheduling for the project to ensure consistency with Exhibit A and to ensure that the requirements of Federal and State law are met and that the statutory findings required of the City and USMC for their respective decisions on the Project can be made; and 2 ) Whether the work performed is satisfactory and if not, how best to correct the deficiencies in the work; and 3) The division of responsibilities between the City and USMC. 4) Guidance and information provided to the Contractor necessary for work performed under the scope of work. All review comments and response to comments received shall be reviewed and approved by the Project Committee prior to being acted on by the Contractor. 5. CONSULTANT CONTRACT A. The City and the USMC shall jointly select the contractor and the City shall be responsible for entering into a contract with the selected consultant (the Contractor) and administering the preparation of the EIR/EIS for the Project. B. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. Section 1506.5(c), the City shall require the Contractor to execute a disclosure statement, in a form approved by the USMC, specifying that the Contractor has no financial or other interest in the outcome of the Project. C. In the event that total costs for the Project identified by Exhibit A exceed $800,000, the City and the USMC will cooperate in good faith in an effort to identify additional funding sources that might be available to reimburse the City for any expenses incurred in excess of $800,000. In any event, the USMC understands that the City shall have no obligations under this agreement if an OEA grant is not awarded in the amount of at least $750,000. 6. TIME LIMITS AND SCHEDULES A. Pursuant to Section 15110 of CEQA Guidelines, the City and USMC agree to waive the one year time limit for completing and certifying a final EIR/EIS. 4 B. The City and USMC shall make reasonable efforts to comply with an 18 month schedule for completing the EIR/EIS as identified in Exhibit A, or to complete it as soon as practical thereafter. The City and USMC will mutually identify all applicable actions and procedures necessary to meet this schedule and delineate all divisions of responsibilities. In order to meet the 18 month schedule, the USMC shall provide and complete as soon as reasonably possible, Marine Corps studies and work to be used in development of the EIR/EIS and Specific Plan for the Reuse Area, as identified in Exhibit A. 7. In order to obtain comments from all public agencies and from the general public on the draft EIR/EIS, the City and the USMC shall jointly conduct scoping meetings and public hearings on the EIR/EIS, when it is feasible to do so. In any event, each party shall be free to satisfy its own requirements for public disclosure separately as deemed necessary. 8. In the event of disputes as to scientific issues relating to the EIR/EIS, the EIR/EIS shall contain conflicting viewpoints. 9. In the event of disputes concerning mitigation measures the EIR/EIS shall identify the full range of measures under consideration. 10. ASSESSMENT/ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETENESS OF FINAL EIR/EIS. The City and USMC shall independently assess and certify the adequacy and completeness of the final EIR/EIS. 11. CEOA CERTIFICATION. Upon independent certification of the final EIR/EIS, notification shall be made by the City, pursuant to CEQA. 12. COORDINATION OF DECISIONS. Consistent with the parties' agreement (as set forth in paragraph number 2 above) to make a good faith effort to concur in a preferred reuse alternative for the Reuse Area, the City and the USMC shall coordinate their respective final decisions under CEQA and NEPA to ensure consistency. 13. NEPA RECORD OF DECISION. Pursuant to applicable federal laws and regulations, after the USMC and the Secretary of the Navy have approved the final EIS and the Environmental Protection Agency has effected publication of the notice, the Secretary of the Navy will make a decision on the USMC actions related to the Project and a Record of Decision will be published. 14. AGREEMENT COORDINATED WITH NEPA AND CEQA. The City and USMC shall be free to fulfill their statutory responsibilities, including permit issuance, in accordance with CEQA and NEPA 5 requirements or other applicable statutes. 15. MOU ORGANIZATION. The various headings and numbers herein, the grouping of provisions of this MOU into separate sections and paragraphs, and the organization hereof, are for convenience only and shall not be considered otherwise. 16. LIMITATIONS AND AMENDMENTS A. Any modifica`ion of this MOU must be in writing and properly executed by both parties. B. This MOU may be amended by either party upon consent, in writing, of both parties to this MOU. C. The City and USMC shall take whatever further steps they deem necessary, including further MOU's or amendments to this MOU, in order to fulfill the purpose of this MOU. D. Each provision of this MOU is subject to the laws of the United States and the delegated authority in each instance. 17. APPROVAL Each party signing this MOU expressly warrants and represents that the person signing this MOU on its behalf has the authority to execute this MOU. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this MOU to be duly executed on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures. CITY: CITY OF TUSTIN 1A;A By Tilliam A. Huston Its City Manager By Christine A. Shing l n Its Assistant City Manager Dated: August 6 , 1992 Dated: August 6 , 1992 (Signatures continued on following page) 1.1 USMC: UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS f By: Dated: , P. D. WILLIAMS Major General, United States Marine Corps Commander, Marine Corps Air Bases, Western Area Approved as to form: City Attorney City of Tustin Ronald G. Ress Counsel to the Commander Marine Corps Air Bases, Western Area 7 1992