Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA BUDGET 1992-93 09-21-92RDA NO. 6 A G E N D A9 ��� _ �Z, 9-21-92 I m C��?� - r teo DATE: In SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 TO: TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FROM: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: 1992-93 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET RECOMMENDATION That the Agency members approve the attached resolution adopting the 1992-93 budget for the Town Center and South -Central project areas. DISCUSSION The Agency had decided to delay adoption of its 1992-93 budget until the State had adopted its budget. The recent legislation adopting the State budget mandates that the equivalent of 17.4% of the Agency's 1990-91 gross tax increment revenue be allocated to the County Auditor - Controller by May, 1993. This amounts to $698,820. All redevelopment agencies in Orange County are under the same mandate. The total of all these funds will be reallocated to school districts based upon a formula devised by the State. The reduction in tax increment revenue is supposed to be for 1992-93 only. The legislation implementing the State budget contains a complicated procedure on how redevelopment agency funds are transferred to the County Auditor -Controller. Because it could be a few 'months before State imposed administrative regulations (the mechanics of transferring the funds) are enacted, staff recommends the Agency proceed to adopt its 1992-93 budget. The Agency does have reserves that can be utilized to meet the $698,820 State mandate, without affecting current projects. The State legislation does require that the Agency notify the County Auditor -Controller by March 1, 1993 as to how the Agency intends to fund the State imposed obligation. Staff will submit a report to the Agency in January 1993 which outlines the options (per State administrative regulations) and a recommendation on how the $698,820 obligation can be met. As indicated above, the State budget refers to the 17.4% reduction in Agency tax increment revenue as a one-time obligation. Given the track record in Sacramento, it is very possible that redevelopment funds will be tapped again in 1993-94 to fund schools, reduce the State deficit, etc. The Agency has the financial capacity to absorb the 1992-93 loss; however any additional State imposed revenue reductions will require changes in the Agency's previously approved financial plans and projects. WAH redevbud.wah 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION RDA 92-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE AGENCY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING REVENUE OF THE AGENCY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992-93. WHEREAS, in accordance with good fiscal policies, the Executive Director of the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency has prepared and submitted to the Board of Directors, a proposed Annual Budget for the 1992-93 fiscal year, beginning July 1, 1992; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors, as the legislative body of the Agency, has reviewed this proposed budget. NOW,. THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Community Redevelopment Agency for the City of Tustin does hereby resolve, determine and order that the following sums of money are hereby appropriated from the revenue of the Redevelopment Agency for the purposes stated during the 1992-93 fiscal year. OperatingExpenses $ 2,141,097 Debt Service 925,000 Capital Improvements 7,749,600 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 1992-93 $ 10,815,697 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tustin held on the 21st lay of September , 1991. ATTEST: Leslie Anne Pontious Chairperson Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary a:rdabudgt.res