HomeMy WebLinkAboutNB 1 SILICON SYSTEMS 09-08-92EW BUSINESS N0. I
,-8-92
t?� �; _ �-
..•
ATE: SEPTEMBER 8 , 1992 Inter-Coms T
TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
FROM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO WAIVE REQUIREMENTS TO CONSTRUCT SIDEiALK AT 14511
MYFORD ROAD (SILICON SYSTEMS)
RECOMMENDATION
Pleasure of the City Council.
BACKGROUND
Attached for City Council consideration is a letter dated August
21, 1992 from Silicon Systems, requesting that the City waive the
requirement to construct a standard sidewalk within the public
right-of-way adjacent to their building along Myford Road, located
at 14511 Myford Road, i.i conjunction with tenant improvements.
This particular building is located at the northwest corner of
Walnut Street and Myford Road.
At the City Council meeting of January 19, 1987 (minutes attached) ,
the City Council established a•uniform policy for the construction
of 5 -foot wide utility clear sidewalks within any industrial areas,
except in areas with concentrated retail uses where the sidewalk
width shall be 8 -foot wide. This requirement is a standard City
condition of approval imposed for all new construction as well as
tenant improvements'with_n the industrial areas.
DISCUSSION
An 8 -foot wide sidewalk currently exists along the Myford Road
frontage of the adjacent parcel (No. 14451 Myford Road - Pacific
Bell facility) immediately to the north. In addition, the City has
scheduled during the current fiscal year the next phase bf sidewalk
construction, utilizing SB -821 funds, along the north side of
Walnut Street from the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (A.T. &
S.F.) crossing spur to Myford Road. This segment also includes the
frontage area for the building in question along Walnut which
represents approximately fifty percent of the buildings total
street frontage along both Walnut and Myford. Last year's SB -821
Walnut Avenue sidewalk ccnstruction included the northerly roadway
portion between Franklin and the A.T.& S.F crossing.
A range of five alternatives for City Council consideration
regarding requests for sidewalk construction waivers in industrial
areas has been presented in a separate agenda item, entitled
"Request to Waive Requirements to Construct sidewalk at 2512-2522
Chambers Road (Crestmark Real Estate and Investments) " . Those five
alternatives include the following:
Request for Waive Requirements (Silicon Systems)
September 8, 1992
Page 2
1. Rescind the requirement for sidewalk construction that
was approved by City Council on January 19, 1987 within
the industrial zoned areas.
This alternative could have an adverse impact, to traffic
safety by forcing pedestrians in the street` travel way
area with the trucks and automobiles.
2. Place a moratorium on the sidewalk requirement within the
industrial areas for a designated period of time or until
the recession is resolved.
3. Require the developer to place a cash deposit in the
amount of $5,000 in a joint account (bearing interest to
the developer) for the construction of the sidewalk at
the time the building occupancy rate increases to 85%
from its current level of 50% as outlined in the letter
of request.
4. Create an assessment district for sidewalk construction
within each industrial.area which would spread the cost
of said sidewalk construction and administrative district
costs over a multi-year payoff period of 10 or 20 years.
This alternative would allow the sidewalk to be
constructed at one time in lieu of on a piece meal basis
as it is currently being done.
5. Deny the request, for waiver of sidewalk construction and
uphold the current City Council requirement of January
19, 1987.
Robert S. Ledendecker
Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
RSL:klb:WRCSC2
Attachments
Dana R. Kas an
Engineering Servi s Manager
sko v v
A TDK Group' Company
August 21, 1992
Mr. Bob Ledendecker
Director, Public Works
CITY OF TiJSTIN
15222 Del Amo Avenue
Tustin, CA 92680
Dear Sir.
ro I
I USTlN p
U811C WORKS DEPT
FC -92-074
Silicon Systems, Inc. has submitted construction drawings to modify an existing restroom in one
of our buildings. The plans were returned with the correction for a required exterior sidewalk
around the building with the physical address of 14511 Myford Road.
I have been informed that the sidewalk required on the Walnut Street side of our building will be
constructed with money available from the City; however, the cost for the Myford Road side will
need to be funded by Silicon Systems.
I would like to formally request a variance to this requirement and at the same time, be allowed
to proceed with the improvement project.
Please advise me of any meetings which may be necessary to attend in order -to obtain this
variance.
Sincerely,
S SYSTEMS, INC.
on over
Director, Facilities
RM:lb
14351 Myford Road, Tustin, California 92680-7022 (714) 731-7110 TLX 188353 FAX (714) 731-5457
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 1-19-87
7. RESOLUTION NO. 87-9 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY'
OF TUSTIN APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 12759 (EAST TUSTIN APART-
MENTS)
Approved- Final Tract Map No. 12759 for the East Tustin Apart-
ments project 'located north of the Santa Ana Freeway, west of
Jamboree, east of El Camino Real, by adoption of Resolution
No. 87-9 as recommended by the Community Development Department
and Planning Commission. 99 ,
•
.8. EXTENSION OF CONTRACTS - EARL ROWEMMST AND REED JENSEN
'
Authorized extension of thef employment contracts for Earl
'
Rowenhorst and Reed Jensen to July 13, 1987, as recommended by
the City Manager. 79
VII.
OROINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION
None.
VIII.
OROINANCES FOR ADOPTION
None.
IX.
OLD BUSINESS
1. ELECTION CONSOLIDATION - RESOLUTION NO. 87-11
Pursuant to Council direction at the January 5, 1987, meeting,
staff prepared subject resolution to consider consolidation of the
municipal election with the Statewide General Election held
November of even -numbered years.
Following a brief questa on -and -answer period, It was moved by
Saltareili, seconded by Kelly, to adopt the following reso u o
setting the matter of the proposed consolidation of elections for a
public hearing on February 2, 1987, and prescribing notice.
RESOLUTION NO. 87-11.- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REQUIRE iT5
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE CONSOLIDATED WITH THE STATEWIDE
GENERAL ELECTION AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE OF PUBLIC HEARING
THEREON
The motion carried 5-0. 48
X.
NEST BUSINESS
1. WIDTH OF SIDENALr.S IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREAS
The Planning Commiss;on has requester a formal pooicy decision, from
Council regarding sidewalk widths and requirements in the indus-
trial areas. On two separate occasions at the request of level-
opens, projects were granted 5 -foot sidewalk widths in lieu of the FILE
F,a
COD
full. 8 -foot widths required by Council Resolution No. 81-4. Since
then, sidewalk requirements have been establisned on a project -by -
project basis subject to site circumstances, proposed use, and
specific zoning regulations.
Engineering staff indicates a uniform policy for 5 -toot, utility
clear sidewalks for the entire industrial area is appropriate,
except areas with concentrated retail uses. Sidewalk meandering
would be subject to specific design guidelines of specific plans
and other documents. Community Development staff supports this
Position with the note that Planning Commission be allowed to devi-
ate from those standards if considered appropriate.
The staff report was presented by the Community Development Direc-
tor as contained in the inter-com dated January 19, 1987. prepared
by the Community Development Department.
Mayor Sa l tarel 1 i was supportive of the staff reccrmendat i on • The
Director of Community Development and Director of Public Works
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 1-19-87
responded to Couf cquestions build ng searding sidewalk placement and
retaining right o wa Y
to establish a uni-
It was moved b KenneQo� seconded
tt tty t c ear sidewalks for the
form po cy or
entire industrial area. inxgept in foot width. The motion with cOncent carried 5-0.
uses where it shall rim 92
Z. SANTA /lull fREE1aJ1Y (I-5)/COSTA MESA FRf.EMY (RTE. S j INTERCHiIl16� -
MOOiFICATIO11
• is planning complete modification of subject interchange
CalTrans th freeways within the Immediate vicinity
along with widening of bo
of the interchange.
The 01 rector of public it Works informed Mayor b affected al ohat the
by any'
interchange modification project 1l
delays on the basic widening project. The newspaper arti.cl.e.Cefer-
enced pertained to the 1-5 ti 1 man aEdgarbetween
t that Costa
s Masa con .
Garden Grove freeways. Cour
firmed by the CAlTrans representative at the redent Transportation
Commission meeting.
The Director added that it is CalTrans' desire to accelerate.Stage
III and attempt construction concurrently with Stage II If all
design and The:right-of-way 'acquisition can be completed in time.
the
Mayor thought Tustin -should wi 11 pressure 1 ncrease CalTrans
access to
do SO interchange modificationbut trot f is since will
_- still be bottlenecked on the narrow freeways.
As recommended in the inter -can dated January 14, 1987, prepared by
the Public Works Oepartment/EngineerintheDivision.
it was Agreemenvewit
bi
Kennedy, -seconded b Ed ar, to approve
the—state o a t ornta or Stage II and Stage III work an the
I-S/Rte. 55 ModificationInterchange roand authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute same. 5-a 87-8
-
Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey requested staff contact CalTrans about the
passibility of restri pi ng the merging lane on the 1-5 between Rte.
55 and the Newport Avenue oofframp t relI eve some of the congestion
where vehicles mergeIn and
3. COLUMUS TU nN PARK CONCESSION STAND LEASE AGRE04EMT .
Proposed agreement Is for use of the concession stand at Columbus
Tustin Park Mr. David
Ascher.
dto make the
concession
stand a for-profit corporation with the intention of making dona-
tions
to non-profit youth orgar.iza;.iors in the Tustin area.
�7)' Counci l wcxaan Kennedy expressed concern that the agreement does not
require a minimum donation t= youth groups.•�Council/sta:f discus- -
uperintendent responded to Council
Sion fol.lcwed. The Recreation S
questions.
The City Manager suggested t"at 1f there is Council consensus that
there should be a built-in formula for donating profits to youth
work onw�at ti is and
of Mr. C Ascher. bring it bak to Council so
groups, staff will
there is no question about
Mr. Ascher stated he will pay the City 1O% of gross profits after
the first year of operation. He explained the procedure for donat-
ing profits to youth groups on an as -needed basis. with requests to
be submitted in writing. He stated he would not be interested in
operating -a concession stand wnicn requires built-in percentages
for various donations.
Councilwoman Kennedy was strongly in favor of setting aside a cer-
tain percentage for youth group donations. rather than leaving it
to Mr. Ascher's discretion.
Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey suggested a review period at the expiration