Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1981 07 20 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way July 20, 1981 1. CALL TO ORDER ~he meetin~ was called to o~der by Mayor Sharp at 3:~8 p.m. II. ROLL CALL . Councilpersons Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli ~ Sharp Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney Charles Thayer, Interim City ~nager Mary E. ~nn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Com. Dev. Director R. Kenneth Fleagle, Co~. Dev. Consultant Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Royleen ~ite, Community Services Director Eva A. Solis, Deputy City Clerk Nancy Miller, A~inistrative Aide Approximately ~0 in the audience It was moved by Edgar, seconded'b~ Kennedy, to recess at 3:19 p.m. III. RECESS to ~e Redevelopment Agency meeting. Carried 5-0. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY July 20, 1981 ~ 1. The meeting was called to order by Chair~n Sharp at 3:20 p.m. 2. Meters Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp Meters Absent: None 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - July 6, 1981. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the minutes of ~e July 6, ~981, meeting. Carried 5-0. 4. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 81-9 - A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Tustin Comunity Redevelopment Agency, ADOPTING THE AGENCY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING REVENUE OF THE AGENCY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1981-82 AS recoE~ended in ~e memo dated July 15, 198~, prepared by ~e Finance Director, it was moved by Edgar~ seconded b~ Kenn~ay, to adopt Resolution No. ~A 81-9. Carried 5-0. .' 29 5. UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES & STREET LIGHT CONSTRUCTION IN REDE- VELOPMENT AREA Mr. Edgar provided additional information to his memo dated July ~8, 1981, wherein he established a simple mini-goal to complete undergrounding and street lighting on arterial streets within a ~ basic downtown ~iangle bunded by Irvine Boulevard, Ne~ort, E1 C~ino, and the E1 Camino extension to Irvine. It Was moved by ~ Edgar, seconded b~ Saltare].]~, to establish ~e following four- year program within financial restraints: Year 1 - Fiscal Year 1982-83 - Irvine Boulevard from Holt to Ne~ort and from Ne~ort to Irvine (this would include the intersection of Irvine and Newport, but would not include the intersection of Holt and Ne~ort). Year 2 - Fiscal Year 1983-84 - Ne~ort Boulevard from Larwin ~re to the flood control channel, south of Irvine and First Street, westerly 200 yards (this would include ~e Newport/Holt and New~rt/First intersections). CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 7-20-81 Year 3 - Fiscal Year 1984-85 - Complete First Street from New~rt to Prospect. Year 4 - Fiscal Year 1985-86 - Prospect from First Street to Beneta Way. Mrs. Kenne~ requested staff input. The City Engineer indicated he had reviewed the proposal and it appears to ~ feasible. The Interim Ci~ Manager suggested Council might wi~ to delay any action on the proposal ~til after the public hearing to ~end the finance plan of the Redevelopment Plan. Mr. Edgar stated that the main purpose of the pro~ is to establish a simple wish list priority, which is subject to reor~r, with the provision of permitting staff to make prelimi- nary contact with the utility companies in one-year increments to allow more valuable planning time, which has historically taken well over a year. Mr. Hoesterey stated his concern over at least reviewing the possible effects the proposal will have on the downto~ area. Mr. Saltarelli stated the proposal is well thought out, and althou~ there was at one time a massive progr~ for under- ~ounding utilities it was pretty much discarded until funds bec~e available. He continued that the Ci~ should conenit to complete ~ose hi~ priority projects, and those contained in the proposal would he~ complete the original master plan for undergrounding. Chairman Sharp stated his support of ~e pro- posal, Motion carried 5-0. 81 7. UNUSED POLE ON EL CAMINO REAL AT SIXTH STREET In response to Mr. Edgar regarding an ~used pole with overhead on E1 Camino Real at Six~ Street, the City Engineer reported that it belongs to the Ci~ and it will be r~oved in conjunc- tion with the E1 Camino Real project. 8o ADJOURNMENT It was then moved~ Kennel, seconded by Edgar, to adjourn at 3:34 p.m. to ~e 7:30 p.m. joint public hearing. Carried 5-0. MEETING OF TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 3:34 P.M. July 20, 1981 IV, PUBLIC CONCERNS None CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ~D~ ~- ~P~ OF ~u'r=S - July 6, 1981 2.APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in ~e amount of $601,268.77 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in ~e ~ount of $94,522.92 50 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 7-20-81 3. RESOLUTION NO. 81~86- A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING FINAL MAP NO. 11282 LOCATED AT 1370 ' SAN JUAN STREET Adopt Resolution No. 81-86 as recommended by the Community Development Department. 99 4. RESOLUTION NO. 81-87 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Traffic Signal Installa- tions at the Intersections of Walnut Avenue at Browning Avenue and Walnut Avenue at Franklin Avenue - Baxter-Griffin Company, Inc.) Adopt Resolution No. 81-87 and authorize payment of the final 10% retention amount ($8,825.98) if no claims or stop payment notices are filed within 30 days of the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion, as recommended by the Public Works Department. 94 5. RESOLUTION NO. 81-88 -A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CENTENNIAL PARK SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE II) Adopt Resolution No, 81-88 and direct the City Clerk to advertise for bids, as recommended by the Public Works Department. 77 6. RESOLUTION NO. 81-89 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ADOPTING THE CITY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING REVE- NUE OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1981-82 Adopt Resolution No. 81-89 as recommended by the City Coun- cil · 29 I It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. Carried 5-0. VI. OLD BUSINESS 1. COMMUNITY CABLEVISION RATE INCREASE AS recommended in the memo dated July 14, 1981, prepared by the Acting City Manager, it was moved b~ Saltarelli, seconded by E. dgar, to authorize the rate schedule outlined in item 2 of Resolution 81-48 for Community Cablevision Company. Motion carried 5-0. 53 2. RESOLUTION NO. 81-81 (REVISED) -- A Resolution of the City Coun- cil of the City of Tustin, Caiif0rnia, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 81-14 TO AMEND EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED THERETO. Following additional comments by the City Engineer to his memo dated July 15, 1981, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedlz, to adopt Resolution No. 81-81 (Revised). Carried 5-0. 104 VII. NEW BUSINESS 1. PERSONNEL VACANCY - POLLICE OFFICER AS recommended in the memo dated July 6, 1981, it was moved by = Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize filling the vacant Police Officer position. Motion carried 5-0. 79 OTHER BUSINESS 1. REQUEST FOR EXECUTIVE SESSSION The Interim City Manager requested an Executive Session for dis- cussion of personnel and legal matters following the afternoon session. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 7-20-81 2. LEFT TURN ARROW AT YORBA/17TH STREETS In reference to the report dated July 10, 1981, prepared by the Engineering Department regarding the left turn arrow at subject intersection, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to direct staff to correct the directional sign to read, "Left or U-turn on Green Arrow Only." Carried 5-0. 94 3. AGREEMENT WITH BOYS' CLUB The City Attorney reported that no response had been received from the Boys' Club regarding the agreement between the City/ Walter Foster/Boys' Club. Councilman Edgar indicated he would contact the Boys' Club representative on the matter. 4. WEED ABATEMENT ON IRVINE BOULEVARD Councilwoman Kennedy referred to a letter dated July~ 16, 1981, from Deby Brown, 1352 01wyn Drive, regarding weeds on Irvine Boulevard between Red Hill and the Fire Station. Councilman Edgar noted that a major portion of the area in question is in the County jurisdiction. Staff indicated they would respond to the matter. 5, BOYS' CLUB AGREEMENT Councilwoman Kennedy commented that the letter from Leonard J. Kroko, 12541 Catalina Drive, Santa And, dated July 10, 1981, regarding the City/Walter Foster/Boys' Club agreement contains valid comments. Councilman Edgar indicated he would follow-up on the matter and report to Council, noting that Mr. Kroko is a County resident. IX. RECESS - ~ EXECUTIVE SESSION & EVENING It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Saltarelli, to recess at 3:44 p.m. to an Executive Session for discussion of personnel and legal matters, and thence to the 7:30 p.m. joint public hearing. Carried 5-Q. JOINT MEETING OF TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECONVENED AT 9:16 P.M. July 20, 1981 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sharp at 9:16 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney Charles Thayer, Interim City Administrator Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer Ronald Nault, Finance Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Norwood Williams, Police Captain R. Kenneth Fleagle, Consultant Ed Knight, Associate Planner Approximately 32 in the audience CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 7-20-81 III. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING 1. AMENDMENT TO FINANCE PLAN OF TUSITN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ~arles Thayer, Acting City Manager, requested that the P~lic Hearing ~ opened, testimony taken, and ~e Public Hearing con- tinued to the Au~st 17, 1981 meeting. The P~lic Hearing was opened at 9:18 P.M. There being no com- ments or objections, it was moved by Hoesterse, seconded b~ Edgar, to continue the hearing' to the Au~st 17, 1981 meeting. Carried 5-0. 81 IV.PUBLIC CONCERNS None V. COUNCIL CONCERNS. 1. SYCAMORE RAILROAD CROSSING Councilmn Hoesterey asked if there had been any progress toward eliminating ~e Sycamore railroad line. ~e City Engi- neer responded that he had not had any definite response but he would contact the PUC ~d request eliminating the clanging soun~ on the sisals. 2. COLUMBUS TUSTIN PARK IMPROVEMENTS Co~cil~n Edgar suggested doing some minimal improvMents on a parcel of ~e Col~bus Tustin Park which adjoins Beneta Way ~d Prospect. It was moved bv Edgar~ seconded b~ Kennedy, for staff to rake a ~nimal review for costs of planting gass and a few bushes on an approximate 20 ft. parcel adjoining Beneta Way and Prospect Ave. Carried 5-0. 77 3. SIX STAR CABLEVISION HEARING Co~cilwo~n expressed her disappoin~ent that staff agendized the Six Star Public Hearing before ~e Planning Ag~cy after Council had agreed that this equipment ~uld not ~ satisfactory next to residential property and that broader notification to residents was not given. She said that staff had met the letter of ~e law but not ~e intent of ~e Council. Interim City Manager Thayer asked for direction as to what latitude the Co~cil wishes. Councilmn Edgar responded that when ~e 300 feet from the property extends into ~rt of a tract, the whole tract should ~ notified. Co~cilmn Saltarelli a~onished staff for not informing the Co~cil at ~e July 6 meeting that ~is Public Hearing for Six Star had been advertised, and he apologized to Councilwoman Kennedy for ~e ar~ent at ~at meeting. Mrs. Kennedy ~pha- sized that the Council does not want these cablevision discs and antenna next to residential property. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoestere~, to adjourn at 9:39 P.M. to the next re~l~ meeting on Au~st 3, 1981. Carried 5-0. Y ~LERK ]