HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1980 07 21 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 Centennial Way
July 21, 1980
I.
CALL TO
ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 4:34 p.m.
II.
ROLL
CALL Present: Councilpersons: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Sharp
Absent: Councilpersons: None
Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Dan Blankenship, City Administrator
Karen J. Eeardsley, Deputy City Clerk
Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director
Robert S. Ledendecker, City Engineer
Royleen A. White, Community Services Director
Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director
Ed Bushong, Finance Director
Loni Hamblin, Finance Coordinator
Approximately 10 in the audience
IIi.
RECESS It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Kennedy, to recess to the
Redevelopment Agency at 4:35 p.m. Carried 5:0.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
July 21, 1980
1. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Saltarelli at 4:35 p.m.
2.Present: Members: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Sharp
Absent: Members: None
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of July 8, 1980 meeting.
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Sharp, to approve the Minutes of
the July 8, 1980 meeting. Carried 5:0.
4. RATIFICATION OF DEMANDS in the amount of $267.50.
It was moved by Sharp, seconded byeEdgar, to approve the Demands in the
amount of $267.50. Carried 5:0.
5. It was requested by Councilman Sharp that Council support the League of
California Cities' position on Senate Bill 1972, which declares that
tax increments are not the proceeds of taxes and thus are an appropriation
subject to limitation under the Gann Initiative, and to send letters
accordingly to help assure that Tustin's Redevelopment Agency remains a
viable one financially. Council concurred.
6. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to adjourn at 4:37 p.m. to
the City Council meeting. Carried 5:01~~~
iN sE TARY /
MINUTES OF TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
RECONVENED AT 4:37 P.M.
July 21, 1980
I.
PUBLIC
CONCERNS None.
II.
CONSENT
CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - July 8, 1980 meeting
2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $27,001.61
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $82,644.26
3. RESOLUTION NO. 80-73
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ACCEPTING
WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF
COMPLETION - Fiscal Year 1979-80 Street Maintenance Program
COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 7/21/80
Adoption of Resolution No. 80-73, as recommended by the Engineering
Department.
4. RESOLUTION NO. 80-74
A Resolution of the City Council, City of Tustin, California,
CONFIRMING WEED AND REFUSE ABATEMENT CHARGES FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1980-81.
Adoption of Resolution No. 80-74, as recommended by the Community
Development Department.
5. RESOLUTION NO. 80-75
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California,
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 80-70, RELATIVE TO THE SECOND YEAR
SALARIES AND BENEFITS FOR NON-ADMINISTRATIVE AND NON-MANAGEMENT
SWORN POLICE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN.
Adoption of Resolution No. 80-75, as recommended by the City Manage-
menE Negotiation Team and the City Administrator.
6. RESOLUTION NO. 80-76
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California,
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 80-71, RELATIVE TO THE SECOND YEAR
SALARIES AND BENEFITS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND MANAGEMENT OFFICERS,
AND CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES.
Adoption of Resolution No. 80-76, as recommended by the City Manage-
men~ Negotiation Team and the City Administrator.
7. RESOLUTION NO. 80-79
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California,
PERTAINING TO THE DISABILITY RETIREMENT OF KENNETH BARTON
Adoption of Resolution No. 80-79, as recommended by the Retirement
Review Board.
8. FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF TRACT NO. 10401 (PARK IRVINE BUSINESS CENTER)
AND RELEASE OF BONDS
Acceptance of the public lmprovemenEs within Tract No. 10401 and
authorization for the release of the Faithful Performance Bond No.
7117497, in the amounE of $99,500; Labor and Materials Bond No.
7117497, in the amoun~ of S49,740; and the Monumentation Bond No.
7117498, in the amount of $2,640, as recommended by the Engineering
Department.
9. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEASE OF CASH BOND RELATIVE TO
PARCEL MAP NO. 79-1033 (West side of Pasadena & Second Street)
Acceptance of the publicimprovements within Parcel Map No. 79-1033
and authorization for the release of the cash bond for said improve-
ments, in the amount of $6,300, as recommended by the Engineering
Department.
10. GALBRAITH & GREEN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE AGREEMENT
Approval of the Galbraith & Green Administrative Service Agreement
with noted changes, as recommended by the Finance Department.
11. AHFP PROJECT NO. 939 AND F07 FLOOD CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS - RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACQUISITION
Adoption of a Minute Order authorizing the Mayor to execute and the
City Clerk to attest to the acceptance certificate on the Road
Easement Deed dedicating the right-of-way required for the con-
struction of AHFP Project No. 939 and F07 Channel improvements, as
recommended by the Engineering Department.
Item No. 4 - RESOLUTION NO. 80-74
A Resolution of the City Council, City of Tustin, California,
CONFIRMING WEED AND REFUSE ABATEMENT CHARGES FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1980-81
Councilman Edgar requested identification as to where the particular parcels
are located.
Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, said that he will supply
that information to Council.
COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 7/21/80
It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar, ~hat the Consent Calendar be
approved. Carried 5:0.
III.
ORDINANCES FOR
INTRODUCTION None.
IV.
ORDINANCES FOR
ADOPTION
1. ORDINANCE NO. 828
An Ordinance of the City Council ~f the City of Tustin, California,
AMENDING CHAPTER 6 OF ARTICLE 4 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING
TO NOISE CONTROL.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, that Ordinance No. 828 have
second reading by title only. Carried 5:0.
Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 828 by Karen J.
Beardsley, Deputy City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by
Edgar, that Ordinance No. 828 be passed and adopted. Carried 4:1.
ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Sharp, Kennedy
NOES: Saltarelli,
V.
OLD
BUSINESS None.
VI.
NEW
BUSINESS
1. RESTRICTED ALLEY PARKING (SOUTHERLY OF LINDA LANE AND EASTERLY OF
YORBA STREET)
Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, reported that a copy of the Engineering
Department's report on this subject had been sent to every resident
involved; and, since that time, only one reply has been received from
the resident at 13671 Rosalind. That person felt that if parking were
allowed on either the east or west side it would create an impact on
the other residents. The staff recommendation is to leave the signs
as they are.
Councilman Edgar commented that the primary residents that are incon-
venienced by the parking restriction in the alley are those whose houses
front on Yorba Street.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to restrict parking on only
one side of the :~ll-ey (west) and in the cul-de-sac. Carried 5:0.
2. TUSTIN VILLAGE WAY SIGNING
It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Kennedy, to authorize the installation
of 25 MPH signs for both directions of travel on Tustin Village Way
between the freeway ramps and Alliance Avenue; and to replace the
!'McFadden Avenue" directional sign westerly of the freeway ramps with a
new sign (identical) in a slightly lower position for better visibility.
Carried
3. REGULATION OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING STRUCTURES AND THE REMOVAL THEREOF
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to continue discussion of
the regulation of outdoor advertising structures to the next regular
meeting on August 4, 1980. Carried 5:0.
4. TAX ALLOCATION ON NEW ANNEXATIONS
Councilman Edgar asked if the County resident, with the implementation
of Proposition 13, pays a fire service differential fee over and above
the 1% property tax.
Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, replied that the County residents
do not yet pay a differential fee for fire service; but they do pay the
structural fire fund portion of the property taxes, which are a portion
of the 1%. Indications are that the County will be able to exist for
one more year without levying a special benefit assessment to make up
the difference of the property tax revenue. Basically, the County is
funding the fire service approximately 50% with the Special District
Augmentation Fund, assigned by the County Board. The County is seriously
COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 7/21/80
considering the possibility of levying a benefit assessment for
structural fire protection to supplement the fund.
Mayor Saltarelli asked that staff submit a report on this.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Ken~edy, thatCoun~il~supp~rt
the proposed compromise agreement. Carried 5:0.
5. PERSONNEL VACANCY- MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize the
filling of the vacancy of one Maintenance Man I in the Maintenance
Department. Carried 5:0.
6. RESOLUTION NO. 80-78
A Resolutign of the City Council of the City of Tustin, SETTING
A TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE DESIGNATION
AND ADOPTION OF AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT REQUIRING THE
REMOVAL OF POLES, OVERHEAD WIRES AND ASSOCIATED OVERHEAD
STRUCTURES WITHIN THAT AREA OF THE CITYOF TUSTIN LOCATED ON
EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND NEWPORT AVENUE, MAIN
STREET FROM 290'+ WEST OF EL CANINO REAL TO 1036'+ EAST OF
EL CAMINO REAL AN'D ON NEWPORT AVENUE FROM THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY
TO BONITA STREET WHICH AREA IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AND CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that ResolutiOn No. 80-78
be passed and adopted. Carried 5:0.
VII.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved ~~~
by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn t
5:07 p.m~ to the 7 30 p m meeting
MA'~OR f x
b~'~CI~CL~R~
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
July 21, 1980
7:30 p.m.
I.
CALL TO
ORDERThe City Council meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at
7:32 p.m.
II.
ROLL
CALL Present: Councilpersons: Saltarelli, Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy,
Sharp
Absent: Councilpersons: None
Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Dan Blankenship, City Administrator
Karen J. Beardsicy, DepUty City Clerk
Robert S. Ledendecker, City Engineer
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Royleen A. White, Community Services Director
Ed Bushong, Finance Director
Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director
Loni Hamblin, Finance Coordinator
Dr. R. Kenneth Fleagle, Community Development
Consultant
COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5,7/21/80
III.
PUBLIC
REARING
1. RESOLUTION NO. 80-77
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ADOPTING
THE CITY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING REVENUE OF THE CITY FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1980-81.
Mayor Saltarelli opened the Public Hearing at 7:33 p.m.
Seeing no one who wished to speak on this item, Mayor Saltarelli closed
the Public Hearing at 7:33 p.m.
a. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, that, under Redevelopment
tunds, $250,000.00 be committed to the acquisition for parking in
the downtown area; establishing a borrowing beyond that which was
indicated in the budget with the understanding that, when the details
of the tax increment availability are known, some of the under-
grounding expenditure may be deferred. Carried5:0.
b. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to identify the storm
drain projects as: (1) Main Street west of E1 Camino Real;
(2) Main Street east of Prospect Avenue; and (3) Sixth Street
west of E1 Cemino Real, and to allocate $275,000.00 under Redevelop-
ment a~c0mmodating the practicality that the Engineering Department
could have a portion of this project sub-contracted, with the
direction that planning is expected to be done by April 1, 1981.
Councilwoman Kennedy requested a comment from Bob Ledendecker, City
Engineer, in regard to priorities. Mr. Ledendecker responded that
the Main Street projects would be the first two priorities, of equal
importance, and the Sixth Street project would be third. He was in
agreement with getting them done because (1) and (2) would be an
integral part of the E1 Camino Real street reconstruction area.
Motion carried 5:0.
c. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that $20,000 be
budgeted from <~P~rk~!Deve~opme~t~ funds forthe purpose of beautifying
the island areas, between the northerly edge of Columbus-Tustin Park
parking lot and the ballfield, by planting trees, grass and shrubs.
Carried 5:0.
d. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that an appropriate
amount be budgeted from the Beautification Fund for the center
island at Bryan Avenue and Main Street to beautify and significantly
improve the safety at that intersection.
Robert Ledendecker, City Engineer, said that it was staff's intention
to combine this with the Newport center island project.
Motion carried 5:0.
e. It was moved~by Saltarelli, seconded by Sharp, to increase the Police
Department budget in the amount of $75,000 in order to hire two
additional officers and to purchase two motorcycles specifically for
traffic enforcement.
Councilman Edgar requested a monthly report on ticket-writing in
order to see the evidence of law enforcement in terms of tickets.
Chief Thayer said this would be done.
Councilwoman Kennedy asked for the estimated revenue that could be
expected from these two additional units.
Chief Thayer estimated revenues of $8,040 a month, or $96,480
annually, once the units are trained and on the road.
Motion carried 5:0.
f. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Sharp, to adjust the City
Attorney's salary to $65 per hour, and the Deputy City Attorney's
salary to $55 per hour; and that a maximum of $650 per month be
credited toward Council Meetings. Carried 5:0.
##OUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 7/21/80
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Resolution No. 80-77,
with amendments approved at this meeting, bringing Total Appropriations,
All Funds Eo $12,759,006.00, be adopted. Carried 5:0.
2. RESOLUTION NO. 80-72
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, DETER-
MINING THE VALUE OF WRITTEN PROTESTS AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF THE AREA KNOWN AS "SAN JUAN-GREEN VALLEY ANNEXATION NO. 110
(REVISED)" TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA.
Dr. Kenneth Fleagle, Community Development Consultant, reported
that notices had been sent, notice of Eublic hearing had been
published and no written protests have been received. Staff
recommended that, following the hearing, if no one files a written
pro~es~: Paragraph III of Resolution No. 80-72 be amended by
inserting the word "no" inthe rwo ap~roprzate places; and Para-
graph IV of Resolution No. 80-72 be amended by inserting Zero ("0")
in the two appropriate places; and that Resolution No. 80-72 be
adopted, making the annexation effective at such time as an agree-
men~ is reached with the County or is otherwise provided by State
law.
Mayor Saltarelli opened the Public Hearing aE 8:07 p.m.
Seeing no one who wished to speak on. this item, Mayor Saltarelli
closed the Public Hearing at 8:07 p.m.
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Sharp, that Resolution No. 80-72
be adopted, with the inclusions recommended by Dr. Fleagle.
Carried 5:0.
IV.
OTHER
BUSINESS
1. CIVIC CENTER SITE IMPROVEMENTS - FILE #452
Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, said that the City Engineer has
provided Council with a report on the alternatives and the cost of
improvements, particularly the proposed block wall adjacenn to the
Police Department.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt staff's recom-
mendation to revise the 6' 8" wall to provide four planter ~reas,
curb and sidewalk, and to allocate the required funds ($6,173) for
the project; and Eo authorize Mr. Blankenship to prepare a letterl
including the proposed layout drawing, thanking Mr.Deiorio for his efforts.
Carried 5:0.
2. PERSONNEL VACANCY - ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize the
filling of the vacancy of Administrative Secretary, as requested by
Dan Blankenship, City Administrator. Carried 5:0.
3. MOTORCYCLE TRAFFIC COMPLAINT
Councilman Hoesterey stated that he received a letter from a resident
in the PepperLree tract regarding a problem with moEorcycle traffic
in the 'proposed Jamboree area' and a reqnest to eliminate moEorcycle
access ~o that area. Mr. Hoesterey asked that staff attemp~ ~o find
a solution to the problem and reply by letter to the complaintant.
Council concurred.
4. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO FIRE ORDINANCE
Councilman Edgar asked when he might expect the proposed ordinance
which would require smoke detectors in muLti-family units, and one
that would relate to the fire poEential of roof structures.
Attorney Rourke said that he will check on the status of these
recommended ordinances.
5. FREEWAY LANDSCAPING
Councilman Edgar asked that staff check with Cal Trans regarding ~
date of completion of freeway landscaping in Tustin.
COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 7/21/80
Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, said that he
will investigate.
6. PROPOSED BIKE LAND UNDER SANTA ANA FREEWAY ON RED HILL AVENUE
Councilwoman Kennedy asked if Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, has
investigated the possibility of creating a bike lane in the Red Hill
Avenue underpass at the Santa Ana Freeway.
Mr. Ledendecker responded that he has been studying the possibilities
and the costs of accomplishing this. He said that it would involve
the removal of one wall but it is feasible.
7. NEW COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
Mayor Saltarelli welcomed Royleen White as Tustin's new Community
Services Director.
8. LIMIT OF OCCUPANCY TO R-1 RESIDENCES
Mayor Saltarelli mentioned that he was in receipt of a report from
James Rourke, City Attorney, which responded to Kathy Weil's question
regarding the limit of occupancy to R-1 residences. He directed staff
to give a copy of the report to Kathy Weil.
9. FOURTH OFJULY CELEBRATION
Mayor Saltarelli said that he received a report on the Fourth of July
Celebration from Gary Napper, Administrative Assistant, and he
re-emphasized his desire to include the same type of celebration in
next year's budget..
Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, stated that this is in the
1980-81 budget.
V.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 8:23 p.m.
to the next regular meeting on Augus ,~ried 5:0
MAY'OR
city t
~PDT~ bITY~LER~ '