HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1980 04 21 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 Centennial Way
April 21, 1980
I.
CALL TO
ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 4:52 P.M.
II.
ROLL CALL Present: Councilpersons: Saltarelli, Edgar, Sharp, Hoesterey
Absent: Councilpersons: Kennedy
Others Present: Dan Blankenship, City Administrator
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Mike Erotemarkle, Community Development Director
Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer
Roy Gonzales, Acting Personnel Director
Gary Napper, Administrative Assistant
III.
RECESS It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Sharp, to recess to the
Redevelopment Agency meeting. Carried.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
April 21, 1980
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, to appoint Donald J. Saltarelli
as Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency~ Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
1. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Saltarelli at 4:53 P.M.
..~
2. Present: Members: Saltarelli, Edgar, Sharp, Hoesterey
Absent: Members: Kennedy
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Of April 7, 1980 meeting.
It was moved by Saltaretli ~ seconded by Sharp, to approve the minutes
Of the April 7, 1980 ~neeti.ng; Carried 2-0, Edgar and Hoesterey ab-
. Stainin~ as they were not members on that date.
4. RESOLUTION NO; RDA 80~3
A Resolution of the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Tust!n, California, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CENTER
MEDIAN MODIFICATION - FIRST STREET 200+- EAST OF PROSPECT AVENUE
It was- moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar, that Resolution No. RDA 80-3
De passed and adopted. Carried '4;0~ Kennedy absent.
5. It was movedbysharp, secondedby Hoesterey, to adjourn at 4:55 P.M.
te the City Council meeting. Carried.
MEETING OF TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
RECONVENED AT 4:55 P.M.
I. April 21, 1980
CONSENT
CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ~ April 7, 1980.
2, APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $118,352.76.
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $74,658.25.
COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 4-21-80
3. RESOLUTION NO. 80-36
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin ACCEPTING
WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF
COMPLETION.
Adoption of Resolution No. 80-36 and assuming that no claims or
stop payment notices are filed within 30 days of the date of re-
cordation of the Notice of Completion, authorize payment of the
~inal 10% retention ($8,050.38) at that time.
4. RESOLUTION NO. 80-37
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California,
PERTAINING TO THE PROVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION COVERAGE FOR
CITY VOLUNTEERS
Adoption of Resolution No. 80-37 as reconu~ended by the Chief of
Police
5. RESOLUTION NO. 80-38
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO IMPROVE HEATING, AIR CONDI-
TIONING AND VENTILATION SYSTEMS, POLICE AND CITY ADMINISTRATIVE
BUILDINGS, AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS
Adoption of Resolution No. 80-38 as recommended by the Building
Official.
6. RESOLUTION NO. 80-34
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin ACCEPTING
WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF
COMPLETION
Adoption of Resolution No. 80-34 accepting said work and authori-
zing filing of the Notice of Completion and assuming that no claims
or stop payment notices are filed within 30 days of the date of
recordation of the Notice of Completion, authorize payment of the
final 10% retention {$2,198.83) aL that time as recommended by
Engineering Department.
Councilman Hoesterey requested that Item 4 be removed from the Consent
Calendar for discussion.
It was moved b7 Edgar, seconded by Sharp, that the Consent Calendar be
approved except for Item No. 4. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
ITEM NO. 4 - RESOLUTION NO. 80-37 - Provision of Workers Compensation
Coverage for City Volunteers
Councilman Hoesterey asked if the reason for this resolution was that we
could put a limit on the amount a volunteer could receive under Workman's
Compensation and can the individual sue the City anyway.
Attorney Rourke responded that the benefits under Workman's Compensation
are given more readily even though they are limited. Staff feels that it
would be cost effective to provide Workmanls Compensation.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Resolution No. 80-37
be passed and adopted. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
II.
ORDINANCES
FOR INTRO-
DUCTION None
III.
ORDINANCES
FOR
ADOPTION 1. ORDINANCE NO. 825
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California,
AMENDING SECTION 3511b OF TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO BURGLARY
AND ALARM SYSTEMS
COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 4-21~80
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, that Ordinance No. 825 have second
reading by title only. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 825 by Mary E. Wynn,
City Clerk, it was moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar,
that Ordinance No. 825 be passed and adopted.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Saltarelli, Edgar, Sharp, Hoesterey
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kennedy
IV.
OLD
BUSINESS None
V.
NEW
BUSINESS 1. TRAFFIC SIGNAL INVESTIGATION AT IRVINE BOULEVARD AND "B" STREET'
This item was'continued to the 7:30 P.M. meeting for input from residents
who would be at the evening meeting.
2. CENTENNIAL PARK WALL MODIFICATION
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Shar.p, to authorize the modification
of the masonry block wall along the northerly line of the Devonshire
parking lot adjacent to Centennial Park to an approximate height of 2.0 ft.
and the removal and/or pruning of shrubs as needed, and to appropriate an
amount of $450.00 to accomplish said work. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
3. SEVENTEENTH STREET TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, to adopt a minute order authorizing
the Mayor to execute the revised Supplemental Program Agreement No. 1 for the
Seventeenth Street Traffic Signal Interconnect. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
4. AWARD OF BID FOR PROJECT I - MAIN STREET SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT II - PROSPECT AVENUE SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION
Project I provides for construction of s pedestrian walkway along the north
side of Main Street from Williams Street through the freeway underpass and
terminating at the entrance to St. Jeanne de Lestonnac School. To accomplish
this requires construction of 300'~ of retaining wall and 520'± of 5' high
chain link fence within the freeway underpass. The fence is necessary to
protect children and pedestrians due to the fact only a 3.0' wide sidewalk
is possible within the underpass.
Project II provides for construction of sidewalk along the west side of
10 '~
Prospect Avenue from 0 north of First Street to Lockwood Park Place.
Bids were opened for this project on April 11, 1980 at 11:00 A.M., and
were received as follows:
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
B. J. Construction Co. of Monterey Park, CA $27,317.60
Fleming Engineering Inc. of Cerritos, CA 28,308.15
Damon Construction Co. of South Gate, CA 32,482.90
Granstrom Construction Inc. of Gardena, CA 33,213.00
The low bid is 24% over the Engineer's estimate of $21,989.90. There is
presently $26,000.00 budgeted for Project I and $2,000.00 for Project II
for s total of $28,000.00.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, to award the contract for Project
I-Main Street Sidewalk Construction and Project II-Prospect Avenue Sidewalk
COnstruction to B. J- Construction Company of Monterey Park, CA in the
amount of $27,317.60. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 4~21-80
5. STREET LIGHTING
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to have staff to indicate to
the county the city is interested in assuming administration of street
lighting and staff is to analyze and recommend the best alternative to
accomplish that end with the maximum amount of existing property tax
support. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
12. USE PERMIT 79-18, PACKERS SQUARE SENIOR CITIZEN CONDOMINIUMS
Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, reported that when this __
Use Permit was approved, the parking reduction was based upon Senior Housing.
In order to change the use, it would require a Public Hearing. ~
Bob Albertson, President of Village Homes of California, explained that
because of the economy at this time and the high interest rates, they had
only been able to sell 16 units to senior citizens. This has caused them
to be in serious financial trouble and the serious economic impact on this
project would not be good for the City of Tustin. They have had a price
reduction and gone to an interest subsidy program but these things have
had little effect. They would like to be able to rent to younger people
with no children. They have had studies done that show that the younger
people will not require as much parking as the senior citizens because
some of the condominiums will be sold to bachelors or single professional
Boyd Markumand Mark J. Gram reported on the studies they had made.
The Council concurred that they would hear the matter at a Public Hearing
on May 19i 1980.
Councilman Sharp asked staff to be sure that the people who were so opposed
to the complex when it was in the initial stages be notified of the Public
Hearing and to make an extra effort to meet those people prior to the
hearing in order to shorten the hearing.
Councilman Edgar suggested that notices be sent to residents as far as
Red Hill and within one half mile of the area. Council concurred that
notices to residents outside the 300 ft. requirement could be sent to
"Occupants" of the addresses.
VI.
ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Edgar, to adjourn at 5:45 P.M. to the
7:30 P.M. meeting. Carried.
~CITY CLE~~'~
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
April 21, 1980
8:35 P. M.
I.
CALL TO '
ORDER Following the Planning Agency meeting, the City Council was called to
order at 8:35 P.M. by Mayor Saltarelli. ~
II.
ROLL CALL Present: Councilpersons: Saltarelli, Edgar, Sharp, Hoesterey
Absent: Councilpersons: Kennedy
Others Present: Dan Blankenship, City Administrator
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director
Ed Bushong, Finance Director
Roy Gonzales, Acting Personnel Director
Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer
Charles Thayer, Chief of Police
Don Biery, Parks and Recreation Director
COUNCIL MINUTES
page 5, 4-21~80
III.
PROCLAMA-
TIONS Proclamations were read and presented by Mayor Saltarelli to the Boy Scouts
of America, Steelcase of Tustin, and the American Lung Association.
IV.
NEW
BUSINESS 1. TRAFFIC SIGNAL INVESTIGATION AT IRVINE BOULEVARD AND "B" STREET
Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, gave the staff report and added one area
..~ to the written report. A signal installation was planned under FEDERAL
~ AID URBAN SYSTEM PROJECTS (FAU) in 1981. If this project meets the
standards, the estimated cost is $55,000.
James D. Rashid, 17621 Irvine Blvd., #105, Tustin, Margaret Byrd, 158 N.
"B" St., and Joseph Arthur DeCamp, 26382 Mimosa Lane, Mission Viejo,
Principal at Helen Estock School, spoke in favo~ of the traffic signal
because of the dangers to school children and the crossing guard atthat
intersection.
Staff is to look into modifying some of the obstruction of visibility such
as removal of some of the trees in the median, expanding the red zone,
cross-hatching and installation of signs to alert traffic of a school
crossing.
6. REQUEST TO FILL PEPSONNEL VACANCY - BUS DRIVER FOR DIAL-A-RIDE
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, to authorize the recruitment for
and employment of a bus driver and that the salary be adjusted to the range
of $1214 per month. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
7. DEPOSIT MONIES FOR BAND AND CATERING FOR AWARDS BANQUET OF 1980
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltare]]i, to authorize $200 from this
year's remaining funds for the City Awards Banquet ($600) to assist staff
,.~ in retaining the services of the band and catererof their choice. Carried
4-0, Kennedy absent.
8. CONTRACTURAL SERVICES (ELECTION)
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Noesterey, to approve an additional 36
hours, at $10 per hour, of contractural services for the election and to
appropriate $360 for this purpose. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
9. CONSIDERATION OF A FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to support the concept of
establishment of a Fourth of July "patriotic extravaganza" in order to re-
place the traditional private fireworks which are to be prohibited and staff
is to develop more specific plans with community organization input. Carried
4-0, Kennedy absent.
10. APPEAL OF D. L. BARBER REGARDING DENIAL TO SELL CONCEALABLE WEAPONS
The City Clerk received a letter from D. L. Barber asking for a postponement
of his appeal to the May 5, 1980 meeting because his attorney was not able
to attend today's meeting.
It was moved byEdgar, seconded by Sharp, tocontinue this item to the
May 5, 1~80 meeting. Carried 4-0, Kenned9 absent.
~-~
11. FEE WAIVER REQUEST - QUAIL PLACE
John Gamble, 4590 MacArthur Blvd., #500, Newport Beach, attorney for Quail
Place DevelOpment Corp., explained that the owner was not aware of the new
development fees for condominium conversions and since the development had
paid $30,400 new development fees in 1972, they did not feel they should have
to pay $39,800 in new development fees now but should be allowed to just
pay the difference of 9,400.
Councilman Hoesterey expressed that since this was a tax to cover municipal
services, he thought they should pay the fees.
It was moved by Hoestereythat the request be denied to waive the fees.
The motion died for lack of a second.
COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 4-21~80
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, to waive the fees by changing
the ordinance accordingly on the grounds that the original fee was paid
and the developer is to pay the difference in the fees of $9,400.
Carried 3-1, Hoesterey opposed and Kennedy absent.
V.
PUBLIC
CONCERNS Helen Edgar, 13622 Loretta Drive, asked how long the red line had been on
the Curb north of the gas station on Carroll Way.
The City Engineer did not know just when the Maintenance Dept. or the __
Police Dept. had put it in.
Mrs. Edgar also reported that 2 large trucks had parked on their street
all night and she thought something ought to be done about the trucks
parking on the streets all night.
VI.
NEW
BUSINESS 13. REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL - 13621 Utt Drive
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that the street tree at
13621 Utt Drive be removed and replacedwith an approved tree at City
expense. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
14. REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL BY CITIZEN -17441 AMAGANSET
It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Hoestere~, that the request to remove
the laurel tree at 17441 Amaganset be denied as this tree is on the approved
City tree list. Carried 4~0, Kennedy absent.
15. RECOMMENDATION ON DISABILITY RETIREMENT - FRED KRASCO
This item was to be heard toward the end of the meeting after an
EXecutive SesSion.
VII.
OTHER
BUSINESS AWARD OF BID FOR WALNUT AVENUE WIDENING FROM RED HILL AVENUE TO 600+
EASTERLY
This project provides for the widening of Walnut Avenue on the northerly side
(~adjacent to the Nisson Parcel) from Red Hill Avenue to 600'3 easterly. The
construction w~ll consis~ of adding an additional westhound travel lane in
accordance with, City Council approval at their meeting of March 3, 1980.
Bids were opened for this project on April 21, 1980 at 10:00 A.M. and were
received as follows':
CONTRACTOR BID
Hardy & Hatper, Inc., Tustin, CA $19,644.18
Porter Construction Co.~ Santa Ana, CA 21,673.00
CalexPavin~ Co.~ Long Beach, CA 23,269.00
Sully~M!ller Contracting Co., Orange, CA 24,672.00
Jerry Cross Pawing Co., Inc., Costa Mesa, CA 25,081.50
R. J. Noble Co,, Orange, CA 28,455.36
The low bid is 6.4% below the Engineer~s estimate of $20,997.50. There is
presently $44,000~00 budgeted for this work.
It was moved by 8altarelll, seconded by Sharp, to award the bid for Walnut
Avenue widening from Red Hill Avenue to 600~ easterly to Hardy and Hatper,
Inc., Tustin, CA in the amount of $19,644.18. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
PROCLAMATION DECLARING A FIRE DISASTER EMERGENCY AT THE LA POSADA APT. FIRE
Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, reported on a request to the City
Council to authorize a proclamation declaring a fire disaster emergency at
the La Posada fire that can be communicated to the Governor in requesting
loans from the 8~aall Business Administration for tenants and the owner in
the reestablishing thelr households, etc.
COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 4-21-80
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to approve the proclamation
declaring a fire disaster emergency at the La Posada apartment fire in Tustin.
Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
Councilman Edgar pointed out that in a report he received it was stated
that the water delivery was not up to what would be desirable and related
to that he asked if the sale of the Water Company had been submitted to
the Public Utilities Commission (PUC).
Attorney Rourke responded that it should be ready to submit any day. The
attorney who represented the Water Works in the sale is preparing it and
will submit the draft to us before it is filed.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that the Mayor be authorized
to sign a letter to the PUC, prepared by staff, that in a very factual way
presents the details of what water flow was available and what should have
been aveilable in order to give confirmation to the fact that one of the main
reasons that the City is buying the Water Works is to methodically upgrade
the system so that water delivery will be adequate. Carried 4-0, Kennedy
absent.
Councilman Hoesterey was concerned that the letter might cause the City to
have to take the liability for loss of buildings by fire in the future.
Fir. Edgar said that the letter should be strictly factual and not make any
allegations. He also pointed out that we should review the Building Code
to see what type of modifications could exist, perhaps even retroactively,
to be sure that this type fire doesn't happen again.
Chief Larry Hotms, 105 Water St., Orange, CA, Orange County Fire Department,
suggested several alternatives to approaches that could strengthen the code:
retroactive smoke detection, non-combustible roof coverings, and residential
sprinkler systems on new homes. He said the firemen did the best job they
could with the high wind factor. He thanked the Police Dept. for the fine
job that they did.
Mayor Saltarelli suggested that staff make an investigation into how many
homes have aluminum wiring and what the City could do to eliminate this
hazard. For example, could the City negotiate a master contract that home
owners might utilize to correct the problem in their house.
The City Achninistrator and the City Attorney said they would study this
and report back to the Council.
VIII.
RECESS It was moved b~ Sharp, seconded by Edgar, to recess to an Executive Session
for legal and personnel matters at 9:45 P.M. Carried.
MEETING OF TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
RECONVENED AT 10:43 P.M.
I. April 21, 1980
NEW
BUSINESS 15. RECOMMENDATION ON DISABILITY RETIREMENT . FRED KRASCO
RESOLUTION NO. 80-39
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California,
PERTAINING TO THE DISABILiTY RETIREMENT OF FRED KRASCO (SECTION 21025,
GOVERNMENT CODE)
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, to adopt Resolution No. 80-39
with the change from April 1, 1980 to March 1, 1980 on Page 2, Line 14.
Carried 4~0, Kennedy absent.
II.
OTHER
BUSINESS TRUCK TRAFFIC ON WALNUT AVENIlE
Councilman Hoesterey reported that there had been a substantial increase
in truck traffic on Walnut Avenue between R~d Hill and New Myf0rd Rd. and
he asked staff to look into it.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Councilman Edgar stated his position on capital improvements saying that
COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 8, 4-21-80
he would suggest that we deliberately plan that every capital improvement
scheduled for 1980-81 have the plans done by the end of 1980, and to
methodically plan that plans be done by July 1981 for 1981-82 budget.
By July 1981 we would be budgeting against budgeted plans. In order to
accomplish this, there would have to be contractural services.
FINANCIAL CONDITION OF CITY
Councilman Sharp said that the financial condition of the City was very
encouraging. He asked how good the long range planning looked. Last year
the State bailed us out of Proposition 13. If Proposition 9 passes, is
that going to put a burden on the State so that they would not be able to
bail us out again?
Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, said that it was impossible to pro-
ject at this time. He said they could try to load it all on local govern-
ment and the cities will probably be hit the hardest.
Mr. Sharp asked what is our action on getting the 2¢ on the sales tax.
Mr. Blankenship responded that the resolution will go to the legislators
but the LeagueIs feeling is it is not logical in light of proposition 9.
ASSEMBLY BILL 2257
Mayor Saltarelli said he would like to have the Council authorize a letter
in opposition to AB 2257 which would put an unnecessary restriction on
redevelopment agency financing that may prolong, rather than reduce the
length of time an a~ency receives tax increments.
It was moved by Edgar, Seconded b~ Sharp, to authorize a letter for the
Mayor's signature in opposition to AB2257. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
FIKEWORKS ORDINANCE
Mayor Saltarelli asked about the ordinance to ban fireworks.
Dan Blankenship, City Administrator, explained that banning of fireworks
was included in the 1979 Fire Code and we would probably be considering
that Ordinance at the next meeting.
INTEREST RATE
Mayor Saltarelli asked what interest rate the City was getting.
The Finance Director responded that it has come down to about 15%. The
reserve requirements cause us to get a lower rate than some private
investors.
Mr. Saltarelli said he would look into it.
APPOINTMENTS
Mayor Saltarelli appointed Councilman Sharp as representative and
Councilman Edgar as alternate to the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency.
it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Sharp, to accept this appointment as
made by Mayor Saltarelli. Carried 4-0, Kennedy absent.
RESOLUTION TO CHIEF LARRY HOLMS
Council concurred that a resolution commending Chief Holms officially on
his position as Fire Chief of Orange County should be prepared.
III.
ADJOURNMENT It was moved b~ Sharp, seconded by Edgar, to adjourn at 10:58 P.M. to
the next regular meeting on May 5, 1980. Carried.