Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 4 TRAFF SIG INSTALL 05-03-93CONSENT CALENDAR NO. 4 GG _ 5-3-93 _• � �..- �� � �, cam. :� - __ � ,,, �i DATE: MAY 3, 1993 I n t e r- C o m ,`{:i TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF BRYAN AVENUE AND PARKCENTER LANE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, at their meeting of May 3, 1993, authorize the calling in of all existing bonds/cash deposits for the signalization of the intersection of Bryan Avenue/Parkcenter Lane and the deposit of these funds into a separate account for the future traffic signal installation at the subject intersection. FISCAL IMPACT• It is estimated that a project for the installation of a traffic signal at the noted location would cost approximately $120,000.00. The City currently has bonds/cash deposits in the amount of $87,500.00 for this project. The remaining amount (City's share) of $32,500.00 for implementation of this project would be considered for inclusion in the City's Future Capital Improvement Program for FY 93-94. BACKGROUND: As part of the Conditions of Approval for Tract Map Nos. 13053, 13080, 13094, and CUP 92-044, the applicants of those projects were required to post bonds/cash deposits for participation in the future signalization of the subject intersection in conjunction with approval of their project. All of the existing bonds/cash deposits, totalling $87,500.00, will soon expire and will need to be either returned to the project applicants or used for signal construction. If it is determined that a traffic signal is needed at the noted location, the City has the opportunity to redeem the bonds/cash deposits and deposit the funds into a Capital Improvement Program account designated for this project. DISCUSSION: The Engineering Division has recently completed a study of the subject location addressing the need for a traffic signal. As part of the study, the Engineering Division also contacted.the City's Community Development Department and the Police Department and received input regarding the installation of the subject traffic signal. Both City Departments concurred that a traffic signal was needed at the subject location. To determine the need for traffic signals, the City of Tustin uses traffic signal warrants established by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and currently found in the Caltrans Traffic Manual. The study not only examined the need for traffic signalization, at this time, but also investigated the need for installation of a traffic signal at the noted location at a future date. Traffic signal warrants were prepared for the subject intersection and it was determined that conditions meet minimum requirements to satisfy the Peak Hour Volume Warrant. Since the traffic signal warrant has been satisfied under both existing and future conditions, traffic signal construction may proceed in a timely manner. Also, since a majority of the funding for such construction has already been obligated through development Conditions of Approval, it is therefore felt that the calling in of the bonds/cash deposits at this time is appropriate since they are nearing their expiration date, and the funds should be obligated for construction of the project. Robert S. Ledendecker Director of Public Works/ City Engineer RSL:DA:ccg:bryprkct d LrL, CSG<rGtG bi �- Dougl s R. Anderson Transportation Engineer