Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 21 TRANS IMP PROG 11-07-94~0. 21 1].-7-94 3ATE: NOVEMBER 7, 1994 Inter-Com TO: FROM: SUBJECT: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUEST TO WAIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FEES FOR TT 14914 (NEWPORT CAMINO PLAZA) IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council by minute motion deny the request to waive Transportation System Improvement Program fees for the subject development. FISCAL IMPACT If the required Transportation System Improvement Program fees were waived by the City Council, the City of Tustin would be responsible for paying the required fees from City funds to the Transportation System Improvement Authority, pursuant to Section 3(h) of the Tustin - Santa Ana Joint Powers Agreement. The required fees for this project total approximately $101,635. In addition, it is already anticipated that the applicant will be requesting that the Redevelopment Agency enter into a Reimbursement Agreement to financially assist in the undergrounding of overhead utilities in the alley to the north of this property. This was reinforced in Condition 1.13 of Planning Commission Resolution 3280 approved by the City Council on July 5, 1994. BACKGROUND In November of 1989, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1037 and entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Santa Ana which created the Transportation System Improvement Authority (Attachment A). The purpose of the Authority was for Tustin and Santa Ana to jointly develop and maintain a program for transportation system improvements in certain areas of each City, to comprehensively identify all needed transportation system improvements and their priority, to determine the appropriate developer fees to finance said improvements, and to control the expenditure of appropriate development fee revenues for area wide transportation improvements which benefit each respective Transportation System Improvement Program (TSIP) Area. Subsequent resolutions establishing the applicable fees for Benefit Area "A" and "B" have been adopted by the City Council. Resolution 94-72 city Council Report Fee Waiver Request, November 7, 1994 Page 2 TT 14914 established the current fee amount for Benefit Area "A" at $5.53 per square foot of new construction, and $3.31 per square foot of new construction in Benefit Area "B" (Attachment B). A copy of the TSIP Map identifying the location of Benefit Areas "A" and "B" is included in Attachment C. Please note that in some cases, properties fronting both sides of the street along a Benefit Area boundary may be encumbered by the fee program. This methodology was created to ensure that a development impacting a designated street would participate in the program in an equitable manner which is reinforced in Section 1 of Ordinance 1037 which states in part: "...issuance of certain building permits for construction or improvements on those properties lying at least partially within any portion of the City designated by resolution..." On July 5, 1994, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 14914, Conditional Use Permit 94-003 and Design Review 94-005 which authorized an approximate 18,000 square foot retail center, including a drive-thru restaurant, and consolidated four existing lots into two lots located at the northeast corner of Newport Avenue and E1 Camino Real. A copy of the approved tentative map is included in Attachment D. Lot 1 was proposed to be approximately 1.48 acres in size and "L" shaped with property frontage on both Newport Avenue and E1 Camino Real. Two retail buildings totaling approximately 17,000 square feet of floor area were proposed for Lot 1. Lot 2 was proposed to be .44 acres in size and a rectangular in shape corner lot with street frontage on both Newport Avenue and E1 Camino Real. A 900 square foot fast food restaurant (Rally's Burgers) was proposed to be located on Lot 2. Condition 8.1.G of Planning Commission Resolution 3280 related to the project imposed the requirement to pay Transportation System Improvement Program (TSIP) fees (Attachment E) as the subject development is located within Benefit Area "A'! As identified in the map legend for TSIP Benefit Area "A", properties fronting on both sides of Newport Avenue in this vicinity are encumbered by the TSIP fee program. All conditions of the tentative tract map also apply to the Conditional Use Permit and Design Review approvals for the project. The required TSIP fee for the entire development required to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit totals approximately $101,635. The applicant is now requesting that the TSIP fee be waived. The applicant is representing that they were not aware of the required fee and believe that the proposed development is not subject to the subject fee (Attachment F). TT 14914 city Council Report Fee Waiver Request, November 7, 1994 Page 3 DISCUSSION The applicant represents that they were not aware of the TSIP fee requirement. The requirement for the fee and the information to the applicant that this development was located within TSIP Benefit Area "A" was given to the applicant in the first set of written screen check comments provided to the applicant on the subject project as early as March 15, 1994 and again in second written screen check comments dated May 11, 1994 (Attachment G). In addition, payment of TSIP Benefit Area "A" fees were identified as a mitigation measure in the Initial Study/Negative Declaration which was prepared and certified as adequate for the project by the Planning Commission and the City Council in conformance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. As a result, Condition 8.1.G of Planning Commission Resolution 3280 specifically identified the TSIP fee as a condition of the tentative tract map, conditional use permit and design review approvals. Until several weeks ago the applicant or property owner had not specifically inquired about or raised any issues about the TSIP fee requirement. Since payment of the TSIP fees was identified as a mitigation measure for the subject project, any modification to the adopted mitigation measures would require separate and new environmental evaluation to ensure that the impacts created by the proposed development could still be mitigated to a level of insignificance since impact fees will be used to provide area-wide transportation improvements. The applicant also represents that the City had pressured the property owner into submitting and processing a subdivision map in order for the City to impose the TSIP fees. There was never any consideration by city staff to require the tentative map in order to impose the TSIP fee. The current property configuration includes a total of four lots, not eight as represented in the applicant's attached letter. The applicant's development proposal included placing building structures across existing lot lines which were in conflict with zoning development standards related to setbacks and minimum lot sizes, as well as Uniform Building Codes related to buildings, openings and walls adjacent to property lines. In addition, a separate lease arrangement and possible property sale for the drive-thru restaurant was envisioned by the applicant. For these reasons, processing of a tentative tract map was a method available to the applicant to effectively satisfy the applicable Zoning and Uniform Building Code requirements to accommodate the proposed development. It was the applicant's decision to create two (2) lots; one (1) to accommodate the retail buildings and; one (1) to City Council Report Fee Waiver Request, November 7, 1994 Page 4 TT 14914 accommodate the drive-thru restaurant. Accordingly, Condition 9.2 of Planning Commission Resolution 3280 requires that a Final Map be recorded for the development prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy for the project. The applicant has suggested that the property could be resubdivided to create a narrow lot along Newport Avenue which would contain no development, and thus, no TSIP fees would be required. Regardless of the number of lots created, or the proposed lot configuration, the TSIP fee requirement would apply to the entire development project. The fact that there is reciprocal parking and access easements across property lines to and from Newport Avenue, the designated TSIP boundary, would make the TSIP fee applicable to this development. The applicant would not be able to build the proposed development on the existing properties across existing property lines. A Final Map and Reciprocal Access and Parking Agreement reflecting the approved tentative map were submitted by the applicant on September 7, 1994 and are currently in plan check. In response to the applicant's request for waiver of the TSIP fees, staff has consulted with the City Attorney's Office for the City of Tustin, the City Attorney's Office for the City of Santa Ana, and the City of Santa Ana staff related to whether the subject project is located within TSIP Benefit Area "A" and whether the fees are applicable to the subject development to ensure that Tustin staff were properly applying the TSIP fees. All parties consulted concur with our determination that the subject development is located within Benefit Area "A" and payment of the TSIP fees at a rate of $5.53 per square foot of new construction would be required for the entire project. In addition, Section 3(h) of the Tustin - Santa Ana Joint Powers Agreement states in part that: "In the event and to the extent that either party to this Agreement grants a developer any special exemption from or limitation on the payment of developer fees, such party shall pay the Authority the amount of money that the Authority would have received but for such exemption or limitation..." Failure to make such a payment would place in jeopardy the City's relationship with the City of Santa Ana and the joint efforts in program administration and construction of transportation improvements envisioned under the terms of the Joint Power Authority. City Council Report Fee Waiver Request, TT 14914 November 7, 1994 Page 5 There are also existing overhead power and telephone lines on the south side of the alley along the project frontage. The pole and overhead lines must be removed in conjunction with the proposed project since the alley will be used to access the project and one existing power pole is directly in the middle of a proposed driveway from the alley. The Redevelopment Agency has already offered potential financial assistance to the property owner by agreeing to enter into a reimbursement agreement to recover costs associated with the undergrounding of utilities for the properties on the north side of the alley. CONCLUSION Based upon the information discussed above, the subject development is located within the Transportation System Improvement Program Benefit Area "A", and that Benefit Area "A" fees in the amount of $5.53 per square foot of new construction would be required for the entire development. It is recommended that the City Council deny the fee waiver request by Minute Motion. Daniel Fox,/AICP Senior Planner ~hr.lstine A. Snin~e~on sslstant City Manager/ Community Development CAS:DF :bt :TSIP914.DF Attachments: Location Map a B B - C - D - E - F - G - Ordinance 1037 Resolution 94-72 TSIP Map Approved TT 14914 Condition 8.1.G of PC Reso 3280 Applicant's Fee Waiver Request Screen Check Comments; 3/15/94 and 5/11/94 LO,..,ATIO N MAP ? / ~C2 94. c~ NO SCALE 1 3 4 5 6 ? 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 25 26 ORDINANCE NO. 1037 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE BY ADDING SECTION 8101 k. TO ESTABLISH A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT DEVELOPMENT FEE The city Council of the city of Tustin does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Section 8101 of Chapter 1, Article 8 of the Tustin city Code is amended by adding subsection 8101 k. which subsection shall read as follows: K. Transportation System Improvement Development Fee In addition to any other charges or improvement requirements, there shall be a special fee required as a condition precedent to the issuance of certain building permits for construction or improvement on those properties lying at least partially within any portion of the city designated by resolution of the City Councilas a Transportation System Improvement Program Area. The Building Official shall require the p~yment of a speciaI fee in the amount established and regulated by resolution of the City Council within a Transportation System Improvement Program Area before a building permit will be issued when an application for a building permit indicates the following: A construction or improvement project which will result in a new building or structure, or an increase in floor area on a parcel of land which lies wholly or partially within the boundaries of a Transportation Improvement Program Area; and The estimated cost of the proposed construction or improvement, as determined by the Building Official will exceed twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00). For purposes of this section the valuation per square foot shall not exceed that listed in the latest edition of Buildinq Standards Maqazine containing a building valuation data chart. The following construction and improvement projects are specifically excluded from the ATTACHMENT A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. Page 2 1037 requirements of the section. Construction of single family residential units and accessory structures. Tenant improvements and maintenance work which will not increase the floor area of existing structures. c. Off-street parking facilities. d. Any construction or improvements as to which a development fee may not be lawfully be imposed by State law. Any resolution of the City Council establishing a Transportation System Improvement Program Area shall have affixed thereto a map specifically describing the boundary of such Transportation System Improvement Program Area and shall be on file in the office of the city Clerk. The purpose of a Transportation System Improvement Program Area is to identify and designate those areas where the transportation system may experience a significant reduction in the level of service unless corrective measures are instituted concurrent with increased transportation demands. Fees collected for building project~, and improvements on properties in Transportation Systems Improvement Program Areas shall be used to improve the areawide transportation system within such area, except said fees may be expended for improvements outside the area when such improvements will substantially benefit the transportation system within the area. All monies received from fees collected pursuant to Section 8101 k. for permits issued within a Transportation System Improvement Authority upon direction of the City Manager pursuant to the provisions of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the city of Tustin and the City of Santa Ana creating 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 17 18 10 9.0 21 ~.3 25 27 28 Ordinance No. 1037 Page 3 the Tustin-Santa Ana Transportation System Improvement Authority. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ~ day of May, 1990. Richard Edgar Mayor E. Wynn Clerk city of Tustin ORDINANCE CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) ORDINANCE NO. 1037 MARY E. WYNN, city Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the city of Tustin, california, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the city Council of the city of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 1037 was duly and regularly introduced and read at a regular meeting of the city Council held on the 20th day of November, 1989, and was given its second reading and duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of May, 1990, by the following vote: coUNCILMEMBER AYES: Edgar, Puckett, COUNCILMEMBER NOES: None COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: Prescott COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: None Pontious, Potts Valerie Whiteman, Chief Deputy city Clerk RESOLUTION N0. 94-72 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 1t 12 13 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 ~8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT FEES WHEREAS, Section 8101 k. of the Tustin City Code establishes the authority of the City Council to create Transportation System Improvement Program Areas and to establish fees on development in such areas to pay for the transportation system improvements located in or benefitting such areas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed it appropriate to previously establish, by Resolution No. 89-165, two Transportation System Improvement Program ("TSIP") Areas in Tustin, hereinafter referred to as TSIP Area "A" and TSIP Area "B" which are identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, as distinct TSIP Areas and to establish transportation system improvement development fees in each area; and WHEREAS, the "Santa Ana-Tustin Transportation System Improvement Program Study- byAustin-Foust Associates, Inc. and Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates, dated November 25, 1992, was completed% and has fully studied projected development, identified traffic mitigation measures and associated improvement costs and developed a fee program to mitigate traffic impacts generated by development activity within TSIP Area "a" and Area "B"; and WHEREAS, the "Santa Ana-Tustin Transportation System Improvement Program Study", dated November 25, 1992, provided a comprehensive program listing of transportation improvements to reduce potential impacts from proposed development in TSIP Areas "A" and "B"; and WHEREAS, the "Santa Ana-Tustin Transportation System Improvement Program Study", dated November 25, 1992, shows that over thirty-eight million dollars ($38,000,000) in public improvements are needed in TSIP Area "A", including nearly twenty eight million dollars ($28,000,000) in the City of Santa Aha and over ten million dollars ($10,000,000) in the City of Tustin; and WHEREAS, the "Santa Ana-Tustin Transportation System Improvement Program Study", dated November 25, 1992, shows that nearly forty million dollars ($40,000,000) .in public improvements are needed in TSIP Area "B", including over twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000) in the City of Santa Ana and nearly fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) in the City of Tustin; and WHEREAS, the Transportation System Improvement. Program will be applied to all types of development projects including residential, commercial, office and industrial, subject to certain'limited exceptions set forth in Section 8101 k. of the Tustin City Code; and WHEREAS, the use of the fee for transportation system improvements is reasonably related to all types of development projects because the ATTACHMENT B Resolution No. 94-72 Page 2 owners, the occupants and visitors' of all Types of uses will be benefitted by improved vehicular traffic flow; and WHEREAS, the need for the public facilities is reasonably related to all types of development projects because all types of development projects generate vehicular traffic; and W~EREAS, the restriction of the use of fees to transportation system improvements which are located in, or which substantially benefit, the area of the city from which the fees are derived assures that the fees derived from any given development project are used to provide those .transportation improvements which most directly address the needs created by such development projects; and W~EREAS, allowing further development within each TSIP Area without developer contributions toward funding needed circulation improvements would be injurious to the public safety, health and welfare; and WHEREAS, TSIP Areas "A" and "B" consisning of that territory identified in Exhibit "A" were previously established by Resolution No. 92-165. W~tEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 92-153 on December 24 1992 which established permanent Transportation System '-Improvement Program Development Fees.' W~EREAS, the second year graduated fee increase that was authorized by Resolution 92-153 has been determined to place a hardship on development due to the present economic climate and slowdown in development NOW, T~EREFORE, be.it resolved by the City Council of the City of Tustin as follows: 1. Effective January 1, 1993, and until such time as amended by future action of the City Council by adoption of a Resolution the fees to be charged pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 8101 k. for Transportation System Improvement Program A~eas "A" and "B" are hereby established as follows: A. For TSIP Area "A" an amount based upon five dollars and fifty-three cents ($5.53) per square foot of new or added gross floor area of construction or improvements which is the subject of a building permit application for which payment of a fee is requited by Tustin City Code Section 8101 k. B. For TSIP Area "B" an amount based upon three dollars and thirty-one cents ($3.31) per square foot of new or added gross floor area of construction or improvements which is the subject of a building 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 23- Resolution No. 94-72 Page 3 permit application for which payment of a fee is required by Tustin City Code Section 8101 k. 2. The purpose and use of the above said fees is set forth in Section 8101 k. of the Tustin City Code as follows: "The purpose of a Transportation System Improvement ProHram Area is to identify and designate those areas where the transportation system may experience a siHnificant reduction in the level of service unless corrective measures are instituted concurrent with increased transportation demands. Fees collected for buildinH projects and improvements on properties in Transportation System Improvement ProHramAreas shall be used to improve the areawide transportation system within such area, except said fees may be expended for improvements outside the area when such improvements will substantially benefit the transportation system within the area." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 20th day of June, 1994. THOMAS SALTA~LL I MAYOR MARY CL~K CITY " N/S N/S lgT WiS EASTWOOD N/S 2ND N/S FRUIT N! S N/S SEVEN NJS 20'FH MAYI~ERRY T.S.I.P. BENEFIT AREA ~V~E LEGEND S/S DYER T.S.I.P. BENEFIT AREA NORTH SIDE SOUTH SIDE WEST SIDE EAST SIDE NORTH ~T TO SCALE T, RANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMEN:-i' PROGRAM (TSIP) BENEFIT AREAS EXHIBIT A City of Tustin RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) RESOLUTION NO. 94-72 Mary E. Wynn, city Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five; that the above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day of June, 1994, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Saltarelli, Potts, None None Worley Doyle, Thomas I I / / ? / ? ? ? STUDY AREA BOUNDARY STUDY ARF~ BOUND.~LRY Figure I SANTA ANA/TUS-FIN TSIP STUDY A~qEA ATTCAHMENT C ¢ i ill , ,.,.,,i;,~,,,,,,i, ....· .,,.ii:il ..... [ iii I f IIIiiiiI NEWPORT- CAMINO pLAZA ATTACHMENT D Exhibit A Vesting Tentative Tract Map conditions of Approval Page 12 14914 All applicable Building plan check and permit to the Conununity Development Department. fees E. New development fees to the Community Development Department. F. School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School District subject to any agreement reached and executed between the District and the Irvine Certificate of Fee Exemption filed with the Notice of Determination and require payment of fees, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, within forty-eight (48) hours of notification, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLER3K in the amount of $1,275 (one 'thousand two hundred seventy five dollars) pursuant to AB 3158, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990. If this fee is imposed, the subject project shall not be operative, vested or final unless and until the fee is paid. (5) 8.2 Prior to recordation of the final map; the subdivider shall provide executed subdivision/monumentation agreements and furnish improvement/monumentation bonds as required by the City Engineer. GENERAL (i) 9.1 Within 24 months from tentative map approval, the Subdivider shall file with appropriate agencies, a final map prepared in accordance with subdivision requirements of the Tustin Municipal Come, uhe State Subd]v~sJon Map Act, and applicable conditions contained herein unless an exteDs~on is granted pursuant to Section 9335.08 of the Tustin Municipal Code. (i) 9.2 Prior to occupancy of any buildings, the Subdivider shall record a final map in conformance with appropriate tentative map. ATTACHMENT E CUMMINS &WHITE L A W y E 2424 S. E. Bristol Street, Suite 300, Newport I~)ach, CA 92660-0757 Telephone (714) 852-1800 Fax (714) 852-8510 Voice Mail (714) 756-9800 October 21, 1994 RECEIVED 0 CT 2 ~ 199~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAI1, (714) 832-0825 (714) 835-7787 Mr. William Huston City Manager 300 Centennial Way Tustin, California 92680 Lois E. ,1effrey City Attorney, City of Tustin Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin 701 S. Parker Street, Suite 7000 Orange, California 92668 Re.' Newport Camino Plaza, L.P.; City of Tustin Our File No: .1315 Dear Mr. Huston and Ms. Jeffrey: As you know, Newport Camino PlaT~, L.P. ("NCP") has plans to construct a retail center which is already 100% leased to tenants that will yield over $3 million in sales within the City of Tusfin (the "City") annually. We have recently been informed of a very harsh and unexpected fee being imposed upon our client by the that threatens the development of a project which would greatly benefit the City. The City has notified NCP that it intends to impose TSIP Area "A" fees upon NCP when NCP pulls permits to develop its multiple lots located at the corner of Newport and El Camino Real (the "Property"). A careful analysis of the Property's location and the ordinance und6r which the City seeks to obtain the TSIP fees reveals, however, that'they are not applicable to the project in question. NO CONSTRUCTION ON TSIP EFFECTED LOT Strictly viewing City Counsel Resolution 92-153, and without addressing the legality or enforceability of the resolution, the due process issue, adequacy of node. e, etc., the resolution provides that the City will impose a $5.53 per square foot fee on each new square foot of construction subject to a building permit for properties fronting both sides of Newport Avenue. The Property consists of eight lots more particularly described on Exhibit "A" (indicated in the blue boundary). Lot 13, set forth in the red shaded area on Exhibit "A", is the only lot that fronts Newport Avenue. NCP has no intention of building any structures on Lot 13. NCP ATTACHMENT F CUMMINS WHITE L A W Y E R $ Mr. William Huston Lois E. Jeffrey October 21, 1994 Page 2 should, therefore, not be subject to any TSIP fee since there will be no construction on property abutting the far side of the Newport Avenue boundary. NEW TRACT MAP The City has pressured and ultimately required NCP to submit for recordation a new tract map that will combine Parcels 13 through 20 into at least one or perhaps two separate lots. Initially it was unclear to NCP why the City was so adamant that a new tract map combining the multiple parcels be recorded. It now appears that the City may have been attempting to cause the development to fall within the requirements of the TSIP in order to obtain the approximately $100,000 in fees that would otherwise not be obtainable. Regardless of whether this was an intentional act to obtain additional fees or whether such a result would merely have been an unfortunate side effect of the City's desire to combine the multiple parcels, the fees are still inappropriately tied to the new tract map. The new tract map will not be recorded for several months at the very least. NCP intends to pull permits on its development project, if ever, within thirty days. The code and the traditional enforcement of these fees appears to have been to require payment upon issuance of building permits. There is no basis for the City to look to an unrecorded tract map to determine fees when the existing legal descriptions of the Property are substantially different. The City must look to the existing legal descriptions of the parcels and cannot rely on a tract map that may or may not be recorded and is certainly not in final form. MAXIMUM LIABILITY FOR FEES Even if the City planners could somehow justify the position that they~were entitled to rely upon an unrecorded tract map because it would probably be filed with the City at some time in the future, all that NCP needs to do is to modify the shape of the proposed Lot 2 (set forth in Exhibit 'A~ shaded in yellow) to include all of the original Lot 13. The only new construction in the proposed LOt 2 would then be the 900 square foot Rally's Hamburger site, which would yield the City approximately $5,000.00 in TSIP fees. Although this method would allow NCP to avoid the imposition of the majority of the inappropriately assessed fees, it seems like a great deal of work for both the City and NCP to accomplish a goal that can be achieved in a much more amicable manner. CLIMMIN C WH ~ L ^ W Y E R £ Mr. William Huston Lois E. Jeffrey October 21, 1994 Page 3 RESOLUTION If there is a mechanism to decide this issue without bringing it before the Council we would certainly like to pursue that avenue. As we informed you in our earlier discussions, this project is of marginal economic viability to NCP. It is our understanding that NCP will not be able to break ground on this project if it is forced to pay these approximately $100,000 in additional and unwarranted fees. It remains our understanding, however, that the City Council and the NCP panners desire to complete this project. Unfortunately, this issue must be resolved within the next twenty days because PetCo has established a drop-dead date in the spring of 1995, by which it must be able to occupy the completed premises. If NCP is not able to break ground by mid November, 1994, it probably will not be able to meet the deadline set by PetCo and, therefore, will have no economic incentive to build the project. We look forward to working with you to resolve this issue or, if it extends beyond the realm of legal interpretation, we look forward to your support in presenting this issue to the City Council. Please contact us after you have had an opportunity to consider these points. Very truly yours, Patrick R. Boyd for the firm of CUMMINS & WHITE PRB/dds cc: Mr. Frank Greinke Fred M. Whitaker, Esq. Mr. Jay Jaeger Mr. Greg Bennett [l~l$l194931flhOl!.wpdI Exhibit C ~-~dditional Comments and Corrections E 14914, CUP 94-003, DR 94-005 March 15, 1994 Page 27 remediation system to date, and will be used to determine what future activities will be required. These requirements were discussed with Don Greinke several months ago. However, OCHCA has yet to receive the report for the recent sampling or a plan which details any proposed cha~esto the corrective actions being conducted. FEES (c) Prior to issuance of any building permits payment shall be made of all required fees including: a. Major thoroughfare and bridge fees to Tustin Public Works Department. b. Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fee. Ail applicable building, grading and private improvement plan check and permit fees to the Community Development Department. New development fees to the Community Development Department. e. School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School District subject to any agreement reached and executed between the District and the Irvine Company or proof of a release from payment of any f. Transportation System Improvement Program, Benefit Area "A" fees. ~ g. Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant snell deliver to the Community Development Oepartment, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount cf $25.00 (twenty-five dollars) pursuant to AB 3158, Chapmer 170S, Statutes of 1990, enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21151 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period that the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above- noted check, the approval for the project granted ATTACHMENT G Exhibit A - Additional Comments and Corrections TT 14914 May 11, 1994 Page 17 (c) 3. (C) 4. FEES (c) A workplan for all modifications to the remediation system at the subject site must be submitted to and approved by the OCHCA. The OCHCA is also waiting for a report on the findings of the most recent soil samples collected. These findings will allow us to evaluate the effectiveness of the remediation system to date, and will be used to determine what future activities will be required. These requirements were discussed with Don Greinke several months ago. However, OCHCA has yet to receive the report for the recent sampling or a plan which details any proposed cha~$to the corrective actions being conducted. Prior to issuance of any building permits payment shall be made of all required fees including: Major thoroughfare and bridge fees to Tustin Public Works Department. b. Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fee. Ce Ail applicable building, grading and private improvement plan check and permit fees to the Community Development Department. d. New development fees to the Community Development Department. e. School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School District subject to any agreement reached and executed between the District and the Irvine Company or proof of a release from payment of any __ fee.._____ ~11 ~ f. Transportation System Improvement Program, Benefit ~~