HomeMy WebLinkAboutBuilding Board of Appeals 4-8-96, 4-22-96A G E N D A
CITY OF TUSTIN
BOARD OF APPEALS
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 22, 1996
CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
ROLL CALL: Bone, Kasalek, Lunn, Mitzman and Vandaveer
IF YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS, PLEASE
CONTACT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AT (714) 573-
3130.
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not
on the agenda.)
At this time members of the public may address
the Commission regarding any items not on the
agenda and within the subject matter
jurisdiction of the Commission (NO action can
be taken off -agenda items unless authorized by
law).
IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY
MATTER, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE CARDS
LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE SO THAT YOUR
REMARKS ON THE TAPE RECORDING OF THE MEETING
CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO YOU. WHEN YOU START TO
ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL
NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
/ IF YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS, PLEASE
(\J_ CONTACT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECORDING
SECRETARY AT (714) 573-3105.
CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE
CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE
MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION
OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING
ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE
COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of the April 8, 1996 Board of Appeals Meeting.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
ADJOURNMENT:
The next meeting of the Board of Appeals will be set as items are
scheduled for appeal.
M I N U T E S
CITY OF TUSTIN
BOARD OF APPEALS
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 8, 1996
CALL TO ORDER: 6:07 p.m., City Council Chambers
ROLL CALL:
Board of Anneals
Present: Board Member Marjorie Rasalek, Chairwoman
Board Member Lou Bone, Vice Chairman
Board Member Nanette Lunn
Board Member David Vandaveer
Absent: Board Member Howard Mitzman
Staff
Present: Elizabeth Binsack, Community Development Director
Mark Galvan, Code Enforcement Officer
Dave Gottlieb, Redevelopment Program Manager
Lois Jeffrey, City Attorney
Soroush Rahbari, Acting Building Official
Barbara Reyes, Recording Secretary
George Wiesinger, Code Enforcement Officer
Other Agencies
Present: Mike Goldsberry, Orange County Environmental Health
Specialist
David Montgomery, Orange County Fire Safety Specialist
1. McFadden Villa e A artments
1- c a en venue)
Recommendation - That the Board of Appeals uphold the decisions of
the Building Official as contained in the Notice and Order issued
February 22, 1996 by adopting Board of Appeals Resolution 96-1 as
submitted or revised.
Board of Appeals Minutes %
April 8, 1996
Page 2
The Notice and Order requires the property owner to correct
violations of the California State Health and Safety Code, the
Uniform Fire Code and the City of Tustin Municipal Code. The
Notice and Order further establishes time limits for the correction
of the violations.
An oral report, video and photographic board presentation was given
by Elizabeth Binsack, Community Development Director.
Vinay Pai, The Appellant, stated that he was not personally the
owner of this property but that it was owned by two limited
partnerships of which he is the general partner. Concerning the
interior violations, he stated there were 147 total interior
violations in Schedule A out of which 117 were signed off already
so he feels they made a conscientious effort even though the City
deadline is June 1 1996. Out of the 147 violations, 16 heaters
were reported as not working. After inspection only four had to be j
replaced. He stated that the inspector was not familiar with how (\
they worked and the other 12 heaters were actually working. He
stated that he personally called the health department inspector
and never got a return call from them. He stated that since he
purchased the property in 1985 there has been roach infestation but
that he has a roach exterminator service every month, servicing at
least 10 units at a time. He claimed that this is beyond his
control and by the same token could hold the government of the
United States and the City liable for having roaches on planet
earth. Concerning the eight violations of ventilation, he claimed
the tenants disconnect the exhaust fans and he has no control over
this. With respect to the 23 smoke detector violations he stated
that in many cases the tenants disconnected the detectors and he
does not know what to do, about the actions of his tenants. of the
21 violations of stains on the ceilings, these could have happened
in the past 5 years. He believes that 52 out of the 147 violations
were marginal and not a hazard to anyone's health. He said that in
the past 10 years he has never had any insurance claims against the
property nor complaints of substandard conditions. Even though he
has until June 1, 1996 to correct the interior violations only 30
remain to date. Concerning the exterior violations, he stated that
at his meeting with staff what he.said was not that he would take
two years to complete the improvements but that he would like to do
roofs one every 3 months with immediate hazards corrected
immediately. He has already signed a contract with his roofer and
four units have been completely re -roofed. The rest of the six
buildings were not entirely re -roofed but had been worked on in the
past two years and according to his roofer still have some life
Board of Appeals Minutes
April 8, 1996
Page 3
left in them. He would like to do this over the next one year. He
stated that not a single roof leaked in the last rain and if it was
as bad as the City claims they would have leaked. Concerning the
stairs he stated that he and the City were aware of these
violations since November 30, 1994, when City staff member Clifford
Cox issued the first violation notice. At that time, what ever
violations were cited due to safety were done immediately but that
he has no funds to fix the entire complex. He applied to the
Redevelopment Department program for money to correct these things
and to improve the aesthetics of the property and was assured by
the City that until the loan was funded he would not be cited for
anything else. He claims that since November 30, 1994, until
February 22, 1996, when the Notice and Order was issued, the City
did not take any action which he claims proves his point, as long
as he complied by fixing the life threatening things. He feels
that the main problems are the roofs and if they are not now
leaking he .would like to defer finishing them for one year. He
stated that this work will cost $100,000 and this is why he is
C requesting additional time. He presented photographs to the Board
showing that all the debris has been removed from roofs and showing
those roofs which he feels can last for another year or two.
The Public Hearing opened at 6:50 p.m.
Commissioner Kasalek asked if the roofer had inspected those roofs
which were recommended could last another year to see if there was
rot under them.
Les Landers, owner of Roofing Concepts, 657 Beach Boulevard, Costa
Mesa, stated he has worked on two buildings so far. He stated he
was resheeting the one that collapsed and will have to redo the
insulation. The other roofs look acceptable from the top, but the
outer roof material would have to be removed to inspect what is
underneath. Mr. Landers did not recommend that the outer material
be removed until the buildings are ready to be re -roofed.
Commissioner Lunn asked if he had done a visual inspection from
inside the apartment.
Les Landers stated he had not.
Commissioner Vandaveer asked if the roofs had been flooded to see
if there was water seeping through any of the cracks.
Board of Appeals Minutes
April 8, 1996
Page 4
Les Landers stated he had not seen the pictures and was not aware
of any cracks. He had not flooded the roofs, he has relied on the
rains as a gauge to leakage.
Elizabeth Binsack, Director, clarified that the City has not filed
any criminal or civil actions. The Notice and Order was meant to
have the violations corrected. The City wastrying to achieve
compliance with health and safety standards rather than taking
punitive actions. Mr. Pai made a statement that a prior City staff
inspector did not require the property to meet Code standards. Ms.
Binsack stated that a staff member does not have the ability to
waive the Code particularly as they related to health safety. Mr
Pai has applied for monies from the City's Redevelopment Agency for
Mr. Pai to receive funding and the maximum funds available are
$31,000 and Mr. Gottlieb has offered Mr. Pai two different
alternatives.
Soroush Rahbari, Acting Building Official, presented his
credentials and stated that these are the worst roof conditions he
has encountered in his experience. He stated that he inspected all
bf the roofs and looked for signs of leaks, cracks, brittle areas, .
visquene plastic and water ponding. There were stained and buckled
ceilings in every building. The roofs may have been covered with
plastic to stop immediate leaking but have not been repaired
according to code. His professional conclusion is that these roofs
cannot go through another rainy season without potentially
hazardous results, like the recent ceiling failure.
Mike Goldsberry, Orange County Health Department, stated that there
are still six units with roaches, nine units with leaking fixtures,
and 10 with damage to walls and ceilings and with loose plaster.
Commissioner Vandaveer, asked if the there was a general problem
with smoke detectors becoming inoperable in all apartments or is
there something that Mr. Pai can do make sure that the detectors
remain operable.
Dave Montgomery, Orange County Fire Authority, stated that Mr. Pai
was not exactly accurate in his description of the condition of the
detectors. Some of the detectors were not working due to the water
damage and some were not working because tenants removed batteries.
The Health and Safety Code requires the owner to be responsible for
each unit or dwelling. On a monthly basis all smoke detectors
should be tested and an accurate record log kept for Fire Authority
review. The log should be available at annual fire inspections.
C
Board of Appeals Minutes
April 8, 1996
Page 5
Commissioner Bone asked the date of the last yearly inspection on
these units and if these units were required to have fire
extinguishers.
David Montaomerv, stated that according to the records the last
date was May 1993. He stated that this inspection is not handled by
Fire Prevention Bureau but by the suppression units which conduct
inspection if time permits, but that after review of this property
all fire extinguishers were in place and serviced.
Vinay Pai stated that he would comply with water testing of the
roofs and if there are leaks he will get them fixed right away. He
further stated that this was a free market and he could not believe
that anyone would continue to live where there was a leak. Further
this is a recession time and landlords have to give all sorts of
incentives to get tenants into apartments. If the roofs were
leaking like as the City claims, every person in McFadden Village
would have moved out. He stated the free market rather than the
arbitrary decision of the City that the roofs need to be fixed
should prevail. He stated that concerning his credentials, he is
not just an owner but also holds a contractors license and knows
roofs having personally. built over $70 million in property in
Orange County during the 19801s. Having knowledge of roofs, if he
thought that they were detrimental to anyone's health he would have
been the first to fix them. He did not want the Board to have the
wrong impression of his wealth since he stated like all builders in
Orange County, he is now broke.
Commissioner Lunn asked.if there was an occupant in the apartment
at the time the roof collapsed. If so, this person was obviously
living in an apartment with a problem roof.
Mr. Pai stated there was an occupant in that apartment and all this
seemed very suspicious to Mr. Pai since the City made the
inspection the very same day and that the tenant wanted $10,000
even .after he was told there was insurance to cover any loss and
that there was no one hurt. The tenant was told he would be moved
to another apartment but seemed only interested in getting money
from this event.
Commissioner Kasalek asked if there had been any indication that
there was a problem with the ceiling previous to the collapse.
Mr.Pai stated that he personally had not seen the ceiling and could
( not say one way or another but that according to his resident
manager the roof did not collapse only the drywall collapsed.
Board of Appeals Minutes
April 8, 1996
Page 6
Commissioner Vandaveer asked how often he inspected his properties.
Mr.Pai stated, "once every three weeks."
Commissioner Vandaveer inquired if the conditions of the property
were acceptable to Mr. Pai.
Mr. Pai stated that lately he has been inspecting the property
every three weeks but that before this he had a property supervisor
to do this work. The problem has built us just recently. In the
1980's, Mr. Pai stated that he maintained the property better
because rents were higher and there was more money to do
maintenance., The first violation was in 1994 and before that there
were no violations.
Commissioner Lunn- asked if Mr. Pai would concede that most of the
things that have recently been done are basically things of routine
maintenance. If routine maintenance had been done on an on-going
basis during the time he owned the property, the structures would
not have gotten to this state of disrepair. 'She stated there are
ways to control the actions of tenants by instituting and enforcing
rules and regulations.
Mr. Pai stated that in hind sight what the'Commissioner said is
probably right. However, he feels that the City has been
overzealous in issuing violations. He cited for example, the roach
infestation, he has a monthly service and if a particular tenant
does not tell him he has roaches he cannot know that fact. He
further stated that he believes that the landlord in California has
no power to enforce rules. It takes five to six months to evict
tenants and if the tenants knows how to obtain legal aid, they can
stay rent free for 8-9 months.
Commissioner Lunn stated she happens to be an apartment manager in
his neighborhood, managing the Newpoint Apartments, and every
apartment complex in the City has been affected by the recession
but that the things that have not been done at his property should
have been done just for human habitation. She went on to say there
are ways to write rules and regulations that are part of a rental
agreement. On those occasions where there have been evictions from
her property, it has never taken nine months to accomplish. She
believes this property has been neglected until the City and the
residents complained and that the stairwells are definitely a
safety hazard now.
Board of Appeals Minutes
April 8, 1996
Page 7
Commissioner Bone asked if it was illegal to place barbed wire on
top of fences.
The Director stated she is aware of the location Commissioner Bone
is referring to and she is not sure that Mr. Pai installed the
barbed wire. She will look into this issue.
The Public Hearing closed at 7:10 p.m.
Commissioner Lunn stated she was concerned about safety of the
stairs, roof leaks, and the people who live in the apartments and
Mr. Pails lack of funds to take care of these problems. She asked
if Mr. Pai would be willing to vacate the apartments and make the
repairs building by building until the all the problems were taken
care of and bring the tenants back once the buildings were in a
safe condition.
The Public hearing opened at 7:11 p.m.
QMr.Pai stated that for roof repair, the City has already given him
until June 1, 1996 to make the repairs and if he vacates the
apartments he will no longer be the owner because the property will
be forfeited to the bank.
The Public hearing closed at 7:11 p.m
Commissioner Vandaveer stated that in looking at resolution 96-1
and hearing that Mr. Pai has indicated that he is not the property
owner asked the City Attorney if that would change the wording of
this Resolution. In part of Mr. Pails letter to the Commission of
April 4, 1996, he indicated he had owned the property for the past
10 years.
Lois Jeffrey, City Attorney, recommended that Resolution 96-1 be
corrected to reflect the correct ownership of the property to the
two investment companies which Mr. Pai indicated in his letter of
April 4, 1996, to the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Bone stated he had gone to the property and personally
walked through the grounds and found the site deplorable. He
further stated that if Mr. Pai had inspected the site, he must have
had blinders on. Commissioner Bone stated he went a step further
and visited other properties owned by Mr. Pai. at 722 Walnut, 1602
N. Ross and 421 E. 16th Street, all in Santa Ana. He stated the
property at Walnut had balconies full of trash and the other two
properties will be in this same state of disrepair if there is no
Board of Appeals Minutes
April 8, 1996
Page 8
maintenance attention given to them
property is owned there are certain
have rights and that the City has
uphold the rights and ensure the
supports staff's recommendation and
very lenient so far and would like to
until they are brought up to code.
soon. He
rights but
a certain
safety of
feels that
see Mr. Pai
stated that when
that tenants also
responsibility to
the citizens. He
the City has been
live in the units
Commissioner Kasalek stated that it is the owner's responsibility
to know the condition of the property and to maintain the property
in a satisfactory manner. She stated that she understood from the
reports submitted that Mr. Pai owns 900 units. If need be, he
should sell one or more to make repairs on the rest to ensure that
there are safe buildings for his renters.
Commissioner Vandaveer moved, Lunn seconded to uphold the decisions
of the Building Official contained in the Notice and Order dated
February 22, 1996, requiring the repair and rehabilitation of
buildings and grounds located at 17271-17289 McFadden Avenue,
Tustin, California by adopting Resolution No. 96-1 revised to
reflect the correct owner names. Motion carried 4-0.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Board of Appeals adjourned to the regular meeting of the
Planning Commission at 7:25 p.m.
The next meeting of the Board of Appeals will be set as items are
scheduled for appeal.
MARJORIE KASALEK
Chairwoman
BARBARA REYES
Recording Secretary
M I N U T E S
CITY OF TUSTIN
BOARD OF APPEALS
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 8, 1996
CALL TO ORDER: 6:07 p.m., City Council Chambers
ROLL CALL:
Board of Appeals
Present: Board Member Marjorie Rasalek, Chairwoman
Board Member Lou Bone, Vice Chairman
Board Member Nanette Lunn
Board Member David Vandaveer
Absent: Board Member Howard Mitzman
Staff
Present: Elizabeth Binsack, Community Development Director
Mark Galvan, Code Enforcement Officer
Dave Gottlieb, Redevelopment Program Manager
Lois Jeffrey, City Attorney
Soroush Rahbari, Acting Building Official
Barbara Reyes, Recording Secretary
George Wiesinger, Code Enforcement Officer
Other Agencies
Present: Mike Goldsberry, Orange County Environmental Health
Specialist
David Montgomery, Orange County Fire Safety Specialist
PUBLIC HEARING
1. McFadden Villa e A artments
1 1- 289 McFadden n........ -i
Recommendation - That the Board of Appeals uphold the decisions of
the Building Official as contained in the Notice and Order issued
February 22, 1996 by adopting Board of Appeals Resolution 96-1 as
submitted or revised.
The Notice and Order requires the property owner to correct
violations of the California State Health and Safety Code, the
Uniform Fire Code and the City of Tustin Municipal Code. The
Notice and Order further establishes time limits for ths correction
of the violations.
An oral report, video and photographic board presentation was given
by Elizabeth Binsack, Community Development nirectcr.
Vinav Pai, The Appellant, stated that he was not personally the
owner of this property but that it was owned by two limited
partnerships of which he is the general partner. Concerning the
interior violations, he stated there were 147 total interior
violations in Schedule A out of which 117 were signed off already
so he feels they made a conscientious effort even though the City
deadline is June 1 1996. Out of the 147 violations, 16 heaters
were reported as not working. After inspection only four had to be
replaced. He stated that the inspector was not familiar with how
they worked and the other 12 heaters were actually working. He
stated that he personally called the health department inspector
and never got a return call from them. He stated that since he
purchased the property in 1985 there has been roach infestation but
Board of Appeals Minutes
April 8, 1996
Page 2
that he has a roach exterminator service every month, servicing at
least 10 units at a time. He claimed that this is beyond his
control and by the same token could hold the government of the
United States and the City liable for having roaches on planet
earth. Concerning the eight violations of ventilation, he claimed
the tenants disconnect the exhaust fans and he has no control over
this. With respect to the 23 smoke detector violations he stated
that in many cases the tenants disconnected the detectors and he
does not know what to do about the actions of his tenants. Of the
21 violations of stains on the ceilings, these could have happened
in the past 5 years. He believes that 52 out of the 147 violations
were marginal and not a hazard to anyone's health. He said that in
the past 10 years he has never had any insurance claims against the
property nor complaints of substandard conditions. Even though he
has until June 1, 1996, to correct the interior violations only 30
remain to date. Concerning the exterior violations, he stated that
at his meeting with staff what he said was not that he would take
two years to complete the improvements but that he would like to do
roofs one every 3 months with immediate hazards corrected
immediately. He has already signed a contract with his roofer and
four units have been completely re -roofed. The rest of the six
buildings were not entirely re -roofed but had been worked on in the
past two years and according to his roofer still have some life
left. He would like to do the remaining roofs over the next one
year. He stated that not a single roof leaked in the last rain and
if it was as bad as the City claims they would have leaked.
Concerning the stairs he stated that he and the City were aware of
these violations since November 30, 1994, when City staff member
Clifford Cox issued the first violation notice. At that time, what
ever violations were cited due to safety were done immediately but
that he has no funds to fix the entire complex. He applied to the
Redevelopment Department program for money to correct these things
and to improve the aesthetics of the property and was assured by
the City that until the loan was funded he would not be cited for
anything else. He claims that since November 30, 1994, until
February 22, 1996, when the Notice and Order was issued, the City
did not take any action which he claims proves his point, as long
as he complied by fixing the life threatening things. He feels
that the main problems are the roofs and if they are not now
leaking he would like to defer finishing them for one year. He
stated that this work will cost $100,000 and this is why he is
requesting additional time. He presented photographs to the Board
showing that all the debris has been removed from roofs and showing
those roofs which he feels can last for another year or two.
The Public Hearing opened at 6:50 p.m.
Commissioner Kasalek asked if the roofer had inspected those roofs
which were recommended could last another year to see if there was
rot under them.
Les Landers, owner of Roofing Concepts, 657 Beach Boulevard, Costa
Mesa, stated he has worked on two buildings so far. He stated he
was resheeting the one that collapsed and will have to redo the
insulation. The other roofs look acceptable from the top, but the
outer roof material would have to be removed to inspect what is
underneath. Mr. Landers did not recommend that the outer material
be removed until the buildings are ready to be re -roofed.
Commissioner Lunn asked if he had done a visual inspection from
inside the apartment.
Les Landers stated he had not.
Board of Appeals Minutes
April 8, 1996
Page 3
Commissioner Vandaveer asked if the roofs had been flooded to see
if there was water seeping through any of the cracks.
Les Landers stated he had not seen the pictures and was not aware
of any cracks. He had not flooded the roofs, he has relied on the
rains as a gauge to leakage.
Elizabeth Binsack, Director, clarified that the City has not filed
any criminal or civil actions. The Notice and Order was meant to
have the violations corrected. The City was trying to achieve
compliance with health and safety standards rather than taking
punitive actions. Mr. Pai made a statement that a prior City staff
inspector did not require the property to meet Code standards. Ms.
Binsack stated that a staff member does not have the ability to
waive the Code particularly as they related to health safety. Mr
Pai has applied for monies from the City's Redevelopment Agency for
Mr. Pai to receive funding and the maximum funds available are
$31,000 and Mr. Gottlieb has offered Mr. Pai two different
alternatives.
Soroush Rahbari, Acting Building Official, presented his
credentials and stated that these are the worst roof conditions he
has encountered in his experience. He stated that he inspected all
of the roofs and looked for signs of leaks, cracks, brittle areas,
visquene plastic and water ponding. There were stained and buckled
ceilings in every building. The roofs may have been covered with
�-.. plastic to stop immediate leaking but have not been repaired
according to code. His professional conclusion is that these roofs
cannot go through another rainy season without potentially
hazardous results, like the recent ceiling failure.
Mike Goldsberry, orange County Health Department, stated that there
are still six units with roaches, nine units with leaking fixtures,
and 10 with damage to walls and ceilings and with loose plaster.
Commissioner Vandaveer, asked if the there was a general problem
with smoke detectors becoming inoperable in all apartments or is
there something that Mr. Pai can do make sure that the detectors
remain operable.
Dave Montgomery, Orange County Fire Authority, stated that Mr. Pai
was not exactly accurate in his description of the condition of the
detectors. Some of the detectors were not working due to the water
damage and some were not working because tenants removed batteries.
The Health and Safety Code requires the owner to be responsible for
maintenance of detectors in each unit or dwelling. On a monthly
basis all smoke detectors should be tested and an accurate record
log kept for Fire Authority review. The log should be available at
annual fire inspections.
Commissioner Bone asked the date of the last yearly inspection on
r--� these units and if these units were required to have fire
extinguishers.
David Montgomery, stated that according to the records the last
date was May 1993. He stated that this inspection is not handled by
Fire Prevention Bureau but by the suppression units which conduct
inspection if time permits, but that after review of this property
all fire extinguishers were in place and serviced.
Board of Appeals Minutes
April 8, 1996
Page 4
Vinav Pai stated that he would comply with water testing of the
roofs and if there are leaks he will get them fixed right away. He
further stated that this was a free market and he could not believe
that anyone would continue to live where there was a leak. Further
this is a recession time and landlords have to give all sorts of
incentives to get tenants into apartments. If the roofs were
leaking like as the City claims, every person in McFadden Village
would have moved out. He stated the free market rather than the
arbitrary decision of the City that the roofs need to be fixed
should prevail. He stated that concerning his credentials, he is
not just an owner but also holds a contractors license and knows
roofs having personally built over $70 million in property in
Orange County during the 19801s. Having knowledge of roofs, if he
thought that they were detrimental to anyone's health he would have
been the first to fix them. He did not want the Board to have the
wrong impression of his wealth since he stated like all builders in
Orange County, he is now broke.
Commissioner Lunn asked if there was an occupant in the apartment
at the time the roof collapsed. If so, this person was obviously
living in an apartment with a problem roof.
Mr. Pai stated there was an occupant in that apartment and all this
seemed very- suspicious to Mr. Pai since the City made the
inspection the very same day and that the tenant wanted $10,000
even after he was told there was insurance to cover any loss and
that there was no one hurt. The tenant was told he would be moved
to another apartment but seemed only interested in getting money J
from this event.
Commissioner Kasalek asked if there had been any indication that
there was a problem with the ceiling previous to the collapse.
Mr.Pai stated that he personally had not seen the ceiling and could
not say one way or another but that according to his resident
manager the roof did not collapse only the drywall collapsed.
Commissioner Vandaveer asked how often he inspected his properties.
Mr.Pai stated, "once every three weeks."
Commissioner Vandaveer inquired if the conditions of the property
were acceptable to Mr. Pai.
Mr. Pai stated that lately he has been inspecting the property
every three weeks but that before this he had a property supervisor
to do this work. The problem has built us just recently. In the
19801s, Mr. Pai stated that he maintained the property better
because rents were higher and there was more money to do
maintenance. The first violation was in 1994 and before that there
were no violations.
Commissioner Lunn- asked if Mr. Pai would concede that most of the J
things that have recently been done are basically things of routine
maintenance. If routine maintenance had been done on an on-going
basis during the time he owned the property, the structures would
not have gotten to this state of disrepair. She stated there are
ways to control the actions of tenants by instituting and enforcing
rules and regulations.
Board of Appeals Minutes
April 8, 1996
Page 5
Mr. Pai stated that in hind sight what the Commissioner said is
probably right. However, he feels that the City has been
overzealous in issuing violations. He cited for example, the roach
infestation, he has a monthly service and if a particular tenant
does not tell him he has roaches he cannot know that fact. He
further stated that he believes that the landlord in California has
no power to enforce rules. It takes five to six months to evict
tenants and if the tenants knows how to obtain legal aid, they can
stay rent free for 8-9 months.
Commissioner Lunn stated she happens to be an apartment manager in
his neighborhood, managing the Newpoint Apartments, and every
apartment complex in the City has been affected by the recession
but that the things that have not been done at his property should
have been done just for human habitation. She went on to say there
are ways to write rules and regulations that are part of a rental
agreement. On those occasions where there have been evictions from
her property, it has never taken nine months to accomplish. She
believes this property has been neglected until the City and the
residents complained and that the stairwells are definitely a
safety hazard now.
Commissioner Bone asked if it was illegal to place barbed wire on
top of fences.
The Director stated she is aware of the location Commissioner Bone
is referring to and she is not sure that Mr. Pai installed the
barbed wire. She will look into this issue.
The Public Hearing closed at 7:10 p.m.
Commissioner Lunn stated she was concerned about safety of the
stairs, roof leaks, and the people who live in the apartments and
Mr. Pails lack of funds to take care of these problems. She asked
if Mr. Pai would be willing to vacate the apartments and make the
repairs building by building until the all the problems were taken
care of and bring the tenants back once the buildings were in a
safe condition.
The Public hearing opened at 7:11 p.m.
Mr.Pai stated that for roof repair, the City has already given him
until June 1, 1996 to make the repairs and if he vacates the
apartments he will no longer be the owner because the property will
be forfeited to the bank.
The Public hearing closed at 7:11 p.m
Commissioner Vandaveer stated that in looking at resolution 96-1
and nearing that Mr. Pai has indicated that he is not the property
owner asked the City Attorney if that would change the wording of
this Resolution. In part of Mr. Pails letter to the Commission of
April 4, 1996, he indicated he had owned the property for the past
10 years.
Lois Jeffrey, City Attorney, recommended that Resolution 96-1 be
corrected to reflect the correct ownership of the property to the
two investment companies which Mr. Pai indicated in his letter of
April 4, 1996, to the Planning Commission.
Board of Appeals Minutes
April 8, 1996
Page 6
Commissioner Bone stated he had gone to the property and personally
walked through the grounds and found the site deplorable. He
further stated that if Mr. Pai had inspected the site, he must have
had blinders on. Commissioner Bone stated he went a step further
and visited other properties owned by Mr. Pai, at 722 Walnut, 1602
N. Ross and 421 E. 16th Street, all in Santa Ana. He stated that
all of the properties had balconies full of trash and the
properties will be in this same state of disrepair as the McFadden
property if there is no maintenance attention given to them soon.
He stated that when property is owned there are certain rights but
that tenants also have rights and that the City has a certain
responsibility to uphold the rights and ensure the safety of the
citizens. He supports staff's recommendation and feels that the
City has been very lenient so far and would like to see Mr. Pai
live in the units until they are brought up to code.
Commissioner Kasalek stated that it is the owner's responsibility
to know the condition of the property and to maintain the property
in a satisfactory manner. She stated that she understood from the
reports submitted that Mr. Pai owns 900 units. If need be, he
should sell one or more to make repairs on the rest to ensure that
there are safe buildings for his renters.
Commissioner Vandaveer moved, Lunn seconded to uphold the decisions
of the Building Official contained in the Notice and Order dated
February 22, 1996, requiring the repair and rehabilitation of
buildings and grounds located at 17271-17289 McFadden Avenue,
Tustin, California by adopting Resolution No. 96-1 revised to
reflect the correct owner names. Motion carried 4-0.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Board of Appeals adjourned to the regular meeting of the
Planning Commission at 7:25 p.m.
The next meeting of the Board of Appeals will be set as items are
scheduled for appeal.
olac� ✓�
BARBARA REyEYEM;
Recording Secretary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12'
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 96-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, UPHOLDING THE DECISIONS OF THE
BUILDING OFFICIAL CONTAINED IN THE NOTICE AND
ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 22, 1996, REQUIRING THE
REPAIR AND REHABILITATION OF BUILDINGS AND
GROUNDS LOCATED AT 17271-17289 McFADDEN AVENUE
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
The Board of Appeals of the City of Tustin does hereby
resolve as follows:
I. The Board of Appeals hereby finds and determines as
follows:
A. That during February, 1996, the Building
Official inspected the buildings and grounds
located at 17271-17289 McFadden Avenue.
B. That on February 22, 1996 the Building
Official issued a proper Notice and Order to
the property owner via certified mail
describing those conditions which violate City
and/or State laws and established reasonable
time periods for correction of those
violations.
C. That on March 20, 1996, an appeal was filed by
the owner with the Building Official
contesting the required actions contained in
the Notice and Order dated February 22, 1996.
D. That pursuant to such appeal, a public hearing
before the Board of Appeals was duly noticed
for 6:00 p.m. on April 8, 1996.
E. That witnesses were properly sworn and oral
and documentary evidence was duly presented to
the Board of Appeals on April 8, 1996.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28'.
Board of Appeals
Resolution No. 96-1
Page 2
II. The Board of Appeals hereby further finds and
resolves as follows:
A. That there is substantial evidence that each
of the violations identified in the February
22, 1996 Notice and Order exists.
B. That the violations identified in the Notice
and Order demonstrate that substandard housing
and property maintenance conditions exist.
C. That the extent of repairs ordered by the
Building Official are appropriate for the
property.
D. That the time limitations for starting and
completing the repairs are reasonable.
III. Based upon the above findings, and upon the oral
and documentary evidence submitted at its April 8,
1996 hearing, the Board of Appeals hereby upholds
the decision of the Building Official as set forth
in the February 22, 1996 Notice and Order of the
Building official subject to the following
conditions:
A. The property owner is hereby ordered to comply
with the requirements of the Notice and Order
identified in Attachment A of the related
staff report dated April 8, 1996, as attached
hereto and incorporated herein.
B. The Building Official is directed to provide a
copy of this Resolution to the property owner.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19,
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Board of Appeals
Resolution No. 96-1
Page 3
C. In the event of non-compliance with the Notice
and Order by the property owner, the Board of
Appeals has requested that the City Attorney
pursue appropriate civil and/or criminal
remedies to force compliance with this Notice
and Order.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Tustin
Board of Appeals, held on the 8th day of April, 1996.
Barbara Rey s
Recording Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, BARBARA REYES, the undersigned, hereby certify that I
am the Recording Secretary of the Board of Appeals of the
City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 96-1 was
duly passed and adopted at a special meeting of the
Tustin Board of Appeals, held on the 8th day of April,
1996.
BARBARA REY S
Recording Secretary
0AWSV
DATE: APRIL 8, 1996 Inter -Com
TO: BOARD OF APPEALS
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT. BOARD OF APPEALS PROCEDURES
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
A Board of Appeals hearing has been scheduled for Monday, April 8, 1996, at 6:00 p.m. to
consider an appeal of A Notice and Order issued by the Building Official regarding
substandard housing conditions and violations of the City's property maintenance ordinance.
The purpose of this report is to familiarize the Board with the appeal hearing process. Prior
to the appeal hearing, an additional staff report will be provided which will address the specific
issues and code sections involved in the appeal.
The following provides a brief description of the composition and purpose of the Board,
appealable items and scope of authority, and the hearing procedures.
Composition and Purpose of the Board
The members of the Planning Commission hold membership on the Board of Appeals
concurrently with their terms of service as Planning Commissioners (Tustin City Ordinance
#1160). The Building Official is the ex -officio member of the Board and acts as Secretary to
the Board.
The purpose of a Board of Appeals is to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or
determinations made by the Building Official relative to the application and interpretations
of the technical codes (i.e., the Uniform Building, Housing, Electrical codes, etc.) adopted by
the City. The voting members of the Board of Appeals may not be employees of the City.
Planning Commission Report
Building Board of Appeals
April 8, 1996
Page 2
Appealable Items and Scope of Authority
In part, Section 204.1 of the Uniform Administrative Code states:
..to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by
the Building Official relative to the application and interpretation of the technical
code, there shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals consisting of
members who are qualified ... to pass upon matters pertaining to building
construction and building service equipment..."
Section 204.2 further states:
"The Board of Appeals shall have no authority relative to interpretation of the
administrative provision of this code or the administrative provision of the
technical codes nor shall the Board be empowered to waive requirements of
either this code or the technical codes."
The full text is attached for the Board's use.
The. above sections mean that the Board of Appeals can consider the use of materials or
methods of construction which may be different from those specified in the Uniform Building
Code (U.B.C.) and can render interpretations of the code. However, the Board should be
aware that the codes are legal instruments governing the construction, use and maintenance of
buildings and structures. The Codes contain certain provisions which are somewhat flexible
and in which discretion is given or implied; therefore, in the absence of such discretion, the
code must be followed to the letter. Granting relief from code requirements would constitute
a variance or exception, neither of which is within the scope of authority of the Board of
Appeals.
As noted, the Board may superimpose its judgment over the Building Official's actions only
in a limited number of ways. The following examples are situations where the Board would
and would not have authority to overturn a decision.
Example 1: The Building Official has exercised his/her discretion and has imposed a
requirement that a permit applicant feels is unwarranted. In this situation, the applicant may
ask for the matter to be referred to the Appeals Board for adjudication.
Planning Commission Report
Building Board of Appeals
April 8, 1996
Page 3
Example 2: Section 1016.4.1, paragraph 3, states:
"The Building Official may issue a permit for the construction of part of a building
or structure• before the entire plan and specification for the whole building or structure
has been submitted or approved..."
If the Building Official refused to issue a permit under the provisions of this Section, this
"discretionary" decision could be appealed to the Board. However, where there is no
discretion, the question of appeal is very different -- See Example 3.
Example 3: Section 505.1.1 of the U.B.C. states:
"Where public ways or yards more than 20 feet in width extending along and adjoin
two sides of the building, floor areas may be increased at a rate of 1'/a percent for each
foot by which the minimum width exceeds 20 feet, but the increase shall not exceed 50
percent."
An Appeals Board has no authority to modify this Section because it is a specific requirement
of the code. Exceptions to the codes cannot be granted by the Board of Appeals.
Hearml! Procedures
The appeal hearing is conducted in a manner similar to a public hearing before the Planning
Commission. The meeting is called to order by the Chairperson. The Chairperson states, "The
Board of Appeals of the City of Tustin is now in session." The recording secretary then
conducts roll call by calling each Board of Appeals member by name. Roll call is followed
by the announcement of all members present or the acknowledgment of the member(s) absent.
Following roll call, the Chairperson instructs the Building Official or Community Development
Director to provide a report.
The Building Official or Community Development Director will then present information to
the Board regarding the action of the Building Official which is the subject of the appeal.
The Building Official may provide the Board with copies of relevant code sections or other
technical data. The Building Official, Community Development Director, or other staff person
will then respond to any questions from the Board.
The appellant will be introduced to the Board and may present testimony. The Board may then
ask the appellant questions.
Planning Commission Report
Building Board of Appeals
April 8, 1996
Page 4
The Chairperson shall ask if there are any persons in the audience who wish to speak regarding
the appeal.
When the evidence has been presented and testimony taken, the chairperson should close the
hearing and the matter should be given to the Board for discussion and resolution. If
necessary, the Chairperson may reopen the hearing, with the concurrence of the Board. In its
deliberations, the Board should make "findings" which are based on the evidence presented and
the sworn testimony given, that support approval or denial of the appeal.
The results of the Board's decisions and findings shall be rendered in writing to the Building
Official with a duplicate copy provided to the appellant.
Rick Brown
Building Official
F
Elizabeth A. Binsack
Community Development Director
Attachment: Uniform Administrative Code Section 204
aa:kbc:br\bdafaplmis
ATTACHMENT A
UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 204
AS AMENDED BY CITY ORDINANCE NO. 1160
SECTION 204 - BOARD OF APPEALS
204.1 -General. In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations
made by the Building Official relative to the application and interpretations of the technical
code, there shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals consisting of members who are
qualified by experience and training to pass upon matters pertaining to building construction
and building service equipment and who are not employees of the jurisdiction. The Building
Official shall be an ex officio member and -shall act as secretary to said Board but shall have
no vote upon any matter before the Board. The Board of Appeals shall be appointed by the
governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure. The Board shall adopt rules of procedure
for conducting its business and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the
appellant with a .duplicate copy to the Building Official.
"The Board of Appeals for the City of Tustin shall consist of five members, comprised of
members of the Planning Commission. Said members shall hold their respective membership
on said Board of Appeals by reason of, and concurrently with their terms of service as
Planning Commissioners and shall cease to be such members upon their ceasing to be such
Commissioners. The Building Official shall be the secretary of the Board.
The Board may adopt reasonable rules and regulations for conducting its investigations and
shall render all its decisions and findings on contested matters, in writing, to the Building
Official with a duplicate copy thereof to any appellant or contestant affected by any such
decision or findings, and may recommend to the City Council such new legislation, if any, as
is consistent therewith.
Three members of the Board shall constitute a quorum. The Chairperson of the Planning
Commission shall be the presiding officer of the Board and in the Chairperson's absence the
Vice Chairperson of the Commission shall serve as the presiding officer. Notices of meetings
of the Board shall be given by at least three days notice delivered to each member personally
or by registered mail; provided, however, that any meeting of the Board shall be legal for any
purpose if the written consent of all of the members of the Board to such meeting is executed
and filed in the records of the Board. The Board shall hold meetings at its pleasure.
The Board shall have the right, subject to such limits as the Building Official may prescribe
to employ at the cost and expense of the City, such qualified individuals as the Board, in its
discretion may deem reasonably necessary in order to assist it in its investigations and in
making its findings and decisions."
Attachment A
l� Uniform Administrative Code Section
204 as Amended by City Ordinance No. 1160
Page 2
204.2 Limitations of Authority. The Board of Appeals shall have no authority relativd to
interpretation of the administrative provision of this code or the administrative provision of
the technical codes nor shall the Board be empowered to waive requirements of either this code
or the technical codes.
O�
C�
DATE:APRIL 8, 1996 Inter -Com �,\S
TO: BOARD OF APPEALS
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: (17271-17289LAPARTMENTS
MCFADD NAVENUE)
That the Board of Appeals uphold the decisions of the Building
Official as contained in the Notice and Order issued February 22,
1996 by adopting Board of Appeals Resolution 96-1, as submitted or
revised. The Notice and Order requires the property owner to
correct violations of the California State Health and Safety Code,
the Uniform Fire Code and the City of Tustin Municipal Code. The
Notice and Order further establishes time limits for the correction
of the violations.
Initial Inspection - FebruarV 5-9, 1996
On February 5-9, 1996, City staff including a Building Inspector,
Code Enforcement Officer and representatives from the Fire
Authority, Health Department and Animal Control conducted a series
of interior and exterior inspections of the above referenced
apartments. The apartments were constructed in 1978 and consist
of fifteen (15) buildings with a total of 73 dwelling units, one
(1) recreation building, and five (5) garage structures. The
Community Development Department organized this inspection team as
a result of several complaints from tenants residing at the
complex. Generally, the complaints related to substandard living
conditions and violations of the nuisance ordinance, building,
housing and property maintenance codes. Three (3) units were
posted as "Unsafe", including one (1) that was ordered to be
vacated immediately.
Board of Appeals
McFadden Village
April 8, 1996
Page 2
Report
Apartments
The inspections revealed numerous violations including:
• Deteriorated walls, roofing materials and ceilings to the
extent that the outside is visible from interior rooms;
• Structural damage on stairs, decks and landings leading
to the second floor (i.e. teetering stairways and
landings, defective guardrail and handrails and rotting
floor boards);
• Water damaged living area floors;
• Substandard sanitation and plumbing;
• Inoperable furnaces;
• Inoperable or missing smoke detectors;
• Cockroach infestation;
• Deteriorated exterior walls (stucco and wood trim);
• Deteriorated parking and pedestrian access -ways;
• Mosquito infestation due to ponding from poorly
maintained irrigation systems;
• Significant termite and dry rot damage; and
• General lack of maintenance in the common areas,
including dead, overgrown and missing landscaping and a
deteriorated irrigation system.
Notice and Order to Correct Violations
Based on the extent of property deterioration and the health and
safety concerns, the Building Official deemed it necessary to issue
a Notice and Order to correct the substandard conditions. The
Notice and Order established time -lines for compliance to ensure
the units were repaired and maintained in habitable conditions.
The time -lines established were reasonable given the requirements
of the Uniform Building Code, the safety concerns and the amount of
time necessary to construct the improvements. The specific nature
and locations of the violations are specified in the Notice and
Order. A copy of the Notice and Order is attached for the Board's
consideration (Attachment A).
Board of Appeals Report
McFadden Village Apartments
April 8, 1996
Page 3
Subsequent Actions to the Notice and Order
First Meeting with Mr. Pai
On February 29, 1996, Mr. Pai, the property owner, met with
representatives from the Building and Code Enforcement Divisions
and the Redevelopment Agency. After the meeting, staff reported to
the Community Development Director that the owner was not going to
complete the necessary improvements in a timely manner (i.e., Mr.
Pai wanted two (2) years to make the needed improvements. The
Notice and Order required the "immediate hazard" repairs to be
completed by March 4, 1996 and April 4, 1996 and the remaining
repairs to be completed by June 1, 1996). Based on Mr. Pai's lack
of commitment to complete the improvements, the Community
Development Director deemed it prudent to clarify the City's
concerns at a subsequent meeting.
Request for Fire Authority Assistance
On February 29, 1996, the City received a complaint (via an
emergency call to the Fire Authority) from a tenant that a four (4)
foot by eight (8) foot portion of the drywall ceiling fell within
her living unit. Due to health and safety issues and the potential
liability to the City, the Building Official posted the unit as
unsafe and uninhabitable. A few days later, an additional four (4)
foot by eight (8) foot portion of the ceiling fell within the
kitchen of the same unit. The leaking roof caused the ceiling to.
become saturated and eventually to fail.
Second Meeting with Mr. Pai
On March 20, 1996, the City Attorney, Building Official and
Community Development Director met with Mr.. Pai and Greg Bennett
(Mr. Pai's Agent). At this meeting, Mr. Pai was advised that he
had missed the March 4, 1996 deadline and that the City was
concerned that he would miss the future deadlines established
within the Notice and Order. Mr. Pai advised City staff that some
of the work had been completed and other work was under way but he
did not intend to complete all the required corrections within the
time frames established in the Notice and Order. Mr. Pai stated
that he would appeal the Notice and Order.
Board of Appeals Report
McFadden Village Apartments
April 8, 1996
Page 4
Appeal of the Building Official's Decision
On March 20, 1996, an appeal was filed with the City Building
Official and is included as Attachment B.
Mr. Pai was notified, by certified mail sent on March 25, 1996,
that the appeal will be heard on April 8, 1996, at 6:00 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers. The written notice of hearing is included
as Attachment C.
Mr. Pai contacted the City Building Official on March 28, 1996, and
the Community Development Director on March 29, 1996. Mr. Pai
requested additional time to complete the required work due to
financial constraints: The Director and the Building Official
advised Mr. Pai that his request should be presented to the Board
at the appeal hearing. To date, staff has not received any
information from Mr. Pai to submit for the Board's consideration.
DISCUSSION
The code violations listed in the Notice and Order are violations
of minimum acceptable standards of health, safety, sanitation and
maintenance as prescribed by the California Health and Safety Code,
the Uniform Fire Code, and the City of Tustin Municipal code. The
full text of each code section cited in the Notice and Order is
included as Attachment D. Staff will present a videograph and
photographs of the site's conditions at the meeting (Attachment G).
The appellant has indicated his intent to challenge the Building
Official's decisions regarding the violations and the time -frames
for correction of the violations.
The code violations cited in the Notice and Order do exist and must
be corrected. The Building Official is empowered to determine the
nature of the repairs required and to determine reasonable time-
frames to complete those repairs, per Uniform Administrative Code
Sections 202 and 203, Dangerous Buildings Code, Chapters 2 and 4,
and Uniform Housing Code, Chapter 2.
The buildings have not been re -roofed since they were constructed
in 1978. The roofing and deck waterproofing surfaces are 18 years
old. The waterproofing materials have weathered, aged and worn to
the extent that they no longer keep the building weather -tight.
These roofs and decks have been leaking for some time. This
leaking results in dryrot, mildew, mold and in some cases, failure
of building components. The Building Official has ordered the
Board of Appeals Report
McFadden Village Apartments
April 8, 1996
Page 5
existing roofing and deck waterproofing completely removed and
replaced with new materials. To determine if the structural
components beneath the roofing and deck waterproofing have been
water damaged, the.areas must be exposed by removal of the existing
materials. Re -roofing is subject to Appendix Chapter 15 of the
1994 Uniform Building Code, as adopted by City ordinance No. 1160.
The Building Official has determined that the existing roofing must
be removed and that provisions of UBC Appendix Chapter 15, Sections
1515 and 1516 shall apply. Additionally, Exceptions 1 through 5 of
Section 1516.1 will not be accepted to permit an overlay of new
roofing.
Via the Notice and Order the Building Official established a two
month time -frame for completion of this work. Permits were to be
obtained by April 1, 1996, and all work completed by June 1, 1996.
The time frame established in the Notice and Order is adequate for
re -roofing and deck waterproofing of 15 buildings. This time frame
also means that the buildings will have leaked for an additional 42
months since the City became involved. To date, one building has
been partially re -roofed. The repair and/or replacement of
stairways, handrails and guardrails throughout the complex was
required to start by March 4, 1996 and completed by April 4, 1996.
To date, no action has occurred.
The smoke detectors and heating systems have been repaired or
replaced.
The other miscellaneous violation items cited in Attachment A,
pages 1-11 of the Notice and order have not been corrected as of
this date. Completion by June 1, 1996 is required. The three
units listed as non -habitable have received the most attention from
the owner. These units are nearly ready for release for occupancy.
Staff will inspect the project during the day on Monday, April 8,
1996, and provide oral testimony as to the current status of
outstanding violations and completed items.
Board of Appeals Report
McFadden Village Apartments
April 8, 1996
Page 6
City Financial Assistance
Mr. Pai has made application for financial assistance from the City
Rehabilitation Grant and Loan Program. The maximum funding
available is $31,000 for this project. The $31,000 Grant and Loan
amount is not enough money to complete the repairs required. The
Grant and Loan Program is administered by the City Redevelopment
Agency. Copies of correspondence regarding the Grant and Loan
Program and a list of the 900 apartment units that Pai Investments
owns is included as Attachment E. City financial assistance is
not within the jurisdiction of the Board of Appeals.
This property has been minimally maintained over the last 18 years
and is substandard under the minimum requirements of the codes.
Therefore, the Notice and Order should be upheld (including the
time -frames) or all of the units should be vacated until repaired
to minimum standards for habitation.
P%11( 7�
Rick Brown
Building Official
Elizabeth A. Binsack
Community Development
Department Director
Attachment A - Notice and Order
B - Appeal Form
C - Notice of Appeal Hearing
D - Code Sections
E - City Financial Assistance
F - Board of Appeals Resolution 96-01
G - Videograph and photographs of the
Conditions (Available at the Meeting)
cc: Lois Jeffrey, City Attorney
Soroush Rahbari, Senior Inspector/Plan Checker
PRB:br:appeals.bd
Site and
BOARD OF APPEALS REPORT
ATTACHMENT "A"
G�Tv o
Community Development Department
City of Tustin
February 22, 1996 300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
PAI Investments, Inc.
3745 W. Chapman Avenue, Suite 205
Director
(714)573-3031
Orange, California 92668
Planning & Zoning Info.
(714)573-3140
CERTIFIED MAIL P 476 994 489
Building
(714) 573-3131
(714)573-3132
NOTICE AND ORDER
Housing
(714)573-3117
Property Address: 17271 - 17289 McFadden Avenue
Code Enforcement
Tustin, California 92680
(714)573-3134
Business License
Assessor's Parcel Number: 402-333-01
(714)573-3144
Inspection Requests
The Building Official for the City of Tustin and
(714) 573-3141
inspectors for the Orange County Fire Authority and
Graffiti Hot Line
Health Care Agency have found the buildings located at
(714) 573-3111
17271 - •17289 McFadden Avenue, Tustin, to be substandard
FAX Machine
following inspections conducted at the property in
(714)573-3113
February of 1996. ,
The substandard conditions existing at the. subject
property as defined in California Health and Safety Code
Section 17920.3 are as follows:.
STATE HEALTH & SAFETY CODE
§ 17920.3 Substandard building; conditions
Any building or portion thereof including any
dwelling unit, guest room or suite of rooms, or the
premises on which the same is located, in which
there exists any of the following listed conditions
to an extent that endangers the life, limb, health,
property,,safety, or welfare of the public or the
occupants thereof shall be deemed and hereby is
declared to be a substandard building:
C
PAI Investments, Inc.
Notice and Order
February 22, 1996
Page 2
Inadequate Sanitation
(a) Inadequate sanitation shall include, but not
be limited to, the following:
(1) Lack of, or improper water closet, lavatory,
or bathtub or shower in a dwelling unit.
(3) Lack of, or improper kitchen sink.
(5) Lack of hot and cold running water to plumbing fixtures
in a dwelling unit.
(6) Lack of adequate heating.
(7) Lack of, or improper operation of required ventilating.
equipment.
(10) Lack of required electrical lighting.
(11) Dampness of habitable rooms.
(12) Infestation of insects, vermin, or ,rodents as
determined by the health officer.
(13) General dilapidation or improper maintenance.
(15) Lack of adequate garbage and rubbish storage and
removal facilities as determined by the health officer.
Structural Hazards
(b) Structural hazards shall include, but not be limited
to, the following:
(2) Defective or deteriorated flooring or floor supports..
(a) Members of walls, partitions, or other vertical
supports that split, lean, list, or buckle due to defective.
material or.deterioration.
(6) Members of ceilings, roofs, ceilings and roof supports,
or other horizontal members which sag, split, or buckle due to
defective material or deterioration.
PAI Investments, Inc.
Notice and Order
February 22, 1996
Page 3
Any Nuisance
(c) Any nuisance.
Hazardous Electrical Wiring
(d) All wiring, except that which conformed with all
applicable laws in effect at the time of installation if it is
currently in good and safe condition and working properly.
Hazardous Plumbing
(e) All plumbing, except that which conformed with all
applicable laws in effect at the time of installation and
which has been maintained in good condition, or which may not
have conformed with all applicable laws in effect at the time
of installation but is currently in good and safe condition
and working property, and which is free of cross connections
and siphonage between fixtures.
Hazardous Mechanical Equipment
(f) All mechanical equipment, including vents, except that
which conformed with all applicable laws in effect at the time
of installation and which has been maintained in good and safe
condition, or which may not have conformed with all applicable
laws in effect at the time of installation but is currently. in
good and safe condition and working properly..
Faulty Weather Protection
(g) Faulty weather protection, which .shall include, but not
be limited to, the following:
(1) Deteriorated, crumbling, or loose plaster.
(2) Deteriorated or ineffective waterproofing of exterior
walls, roof, foundations, or floors, including broken windows
or doors.
(3) Defective or lack of weather protection for exterior
wall coverings, including lack of paint, or weathering due to
lack of paint or other approved protective covering.
(4) Broken, rotted, split, or buckled exterior wall
coverings or roof coverings.
C
( PAI Investments, Inc.
Notice and Order
February 22, 1996
Page 4
Fire Hazard
(h) Any building or portion thereof,device, apparatus,
equipment, combustible waste, or -vegetation which, in the
opinion of the chief of the fire department or his deputy, is
in such condition as to cause a fire or explosion or provide
a ready fuel to augment the spread and intensity of fire or
explosion arising from any cause.
Faulty Materials of Construction
(i) All materials of construction, except those which are
specifically allowed or approve3 by this code, and which have
been adequately maintained in good and safe condition.
Hazardous or Unsanitary Premises
(j) Those premises on which an accumulation of weeds,
vegetation, junk, dead organic matter, debris, garbage, offal,
C. rodent harborages, stagnant water, combustible materials, and
similar materials or conditions constitute fire, ,health, or
safety hazards.
Inadequate Maintenance
(k) Any building or portion thereof which is determined to
be an unsafe. building due to inadequate maintenance, in
accordance with the, latest edition of the Uniform Building
Code.
Inadequate Fire Protection or Firefighting Equipment.
(m) All. buildings or portions thereof which are not
provided with the fire -resistive construction or fire -
extinguishing systems or equipment required by this code,
except those buildings or portions thereof which conformed
with all applicable laws at the time of their construction and
whose fire -resistive integrity and fire -extinguishing systems
or equipment have been adequately maintained and improved in
relation to any increase in occupant load, alteration or
addition, or any change in occupancy.
CITY OF TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE
In addition to the forgoing substandard conditions, the property is
in violation of City of Tustin Municipal Code Sections 5502(m), 1,
2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. (See Attachment B).
PAI Investments, Inc
Notice and Order
February 22, 1996
Page 5
UNIFORM FIRE CODE
f
As well, the property is in violation of Uniform Fire Code Sections'
10.301(a), 10.504(a), 10.505(a), 10.603, 11.302(a), 12.106(d) and
85.104. (See Attachment C).
The specific locations and types of violations are listed by
building address and/or unit number in Attachment "A" of this
Notice and Order.
ACTIONS REQUIRED
The following actions are required to be taken as determined by the
Building Official:
(1) The Building Official and Fire Marshal require that all
missing, damaged, or inoperable smoke detectors be replaced
with properly placed and functioning smoke detectors by March.
4, 1996. A reinspection of all units identified in Appendix
"A" as having inadequate smoke detectors shall be scheduled
with the Orange County Fire Authority inspector by calling
(714) 832-1011. This reinspection shall be completed by March
8, 1996.
(2) The Building Official and Health Officer require that all
missing and/or -inoperable heating units for the apartment
units as identified in Appendix "A" shall be repaired or
replaced to provide a minimum temperature of 700 at three feet
above the floor. All repairs and/or replacements of heating
units shall conform to the requirements of the 1994 edition of
the California Mechanical Code. The repairs and/or
replacements of heating sources shall be completed by March 4,
1996. A reinspection of all units identified with substandard
heating shall be scheduled with the Health Officer by calling
(714) 834-6377 between 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. and the City of Tustin
Building Division by calling (.714) 573-3120. This
reinspection shall be completed by March 8, 1996.
(3) Apartment units #G and #H, building #17271, shall be vacated
by April 1, 1995 and both units shall remain unoccupied until.
repairs are completed and inspections are conducted by the
Building Official. Upon satisfactory completion of all
required corrections of substandard conditions, the Building
Official will release these units for human occupancy. These
units were posted on February 22, 1996, in conformance with
Uniform Housing Code Section 1104.1.
C
( PAI Investments,'Inc.
Notice and Order
February 22, 1996
Page 6
.(4) The exterior guardrails, handrails; and stairways identified
as substandard in Attachment "A" shall be replaced with new
materialsconforming to the original size, style, type and
paint color of the original materials. This replacement work
shall commence by March 4, 1996 and shall be inspected by the
City Building Division. Inspections shall be scheduled with
Soroush Rahbari, Senior Inspector by cal'lino (714) 573-3120
This replacement work shall be completed by April 4, 1996.
(5) The roofing and exterior deck/balcony water proofing for all
buildings shall be removed. Inspection of all sheathing and
roof framing members shall be scheduled with the City Building.
Division. All rotten or otherwise unsuitable materials shall
be removed and replaced prior to approval for the installation
of new roofing or deck/balcony water proofing materials. All
new roofing must have a minimum Class "B" fire resistive
rating, and provide minimum slope of 1/4"/FT and adequate
drains.to avoid ponding of water on the roof. The repair and
reroof of the buildings and deck/balcony water proofing shall
C_ commence by April 1, 1996 and shall be completed by June 1,
1996. Inspections shall be scheduled with.the City Building
Division following the issuance of the required reroofing and
water proofing permits. Permits for all buildings shall be
applied for and issued by April 1, 1996.-
(6) All remaining substandard conditions identified in Attachment
"A" shall have action to correct commenced by April 1, 1996
and shall be completed and inspected by June 1, 1996.,
(7) Refer to Attachment "A" for specific types of violations and
their location.
If any required repair of property or vacation of units is not
commenced or completed within the times specified, the Building
Official will order the buildings vacated and posted to prevent
further occupancy until the work is completed and may cause the
work to be done and charge the costs thereof against the property
owner.
Any person having any record title or legal interest in the
building may appeal from the Notice and Order or any action of the
Building Official to the Board of Appeals for the City of Tustin,
provided .that the appeal . is made in writing and filed with the
Building Official within 30 days from the date of service of this
Notice and Order. Failure to appeal will constitute a waiver of
all right to an administrative hearing and determination of the
PAI Investments, Inc.
Notice and Order
February 22, 1996
Page 7
matter. To obtain an appeal form, contact the City of Tustin
Community Development Department at (714) 573-3131 or 3132.
The City.of Tustin and the County Fire and Health Officials are
available to meet with you or your representatives to discuss any
issues or questions that may arise regarding this notice or code
and permit requirements.
We look forward to working with you to restore this property to a.
safe and sanitary condition. I may be reached at (714) 573-3130.
Sincerely,
Rick Brown, C.B.O.
Building Official
RB:kd\mcfad.n&o
CC: William Huston, City Manager
Lois Jeffrey, City Attorney
Elizabeth Binsack, Director of Community Development
Rita Westfield, Assistant Director
.Ray Evans, O.C. Health Care Agency
Stephen Cobb, O.C. Fire Authority
Attachments: Attachment A - Violation Locations
Attachment B - Maintenance Codes
Attachment C - Uniform Fire Code
ATTACHMENT A
COMMON AREA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE VIOLATIONS: Code Violations
TCC 5502
GARAGES
Exterior surfaces: All garage structures exhibit signs of broken
and stucco and studs. Garage #53 and #54 has severe structural
damage to studs.
Roof: All garage structures exhibit signs of severe roof damage.
Laundry Room at Garage Structure #1-12: Repair damaged drywall
including holes in walls, deteriorated window sill, broken windows,
missing screens, damaged vinyl floor, all electrical fixtures
missing covers.
LANDSCAPING: General lack of- maintenance including ivy growing
uncontrolled onto exterior of buildings causing damage to stucco; bare
areas where paths have been worn through planter' areas; trees need
trimming and stumps removed; roots causing extensive damage to
pedestrian walkways throughout the complex; landscaping debris allowed
to accumulate on ground. Some planter areas are completely devoid of
landscaping including the strip adjacent to the driveway along the west
property line and all of the planter areas in the north parking lot
area.
The property owner shall submit a landscaping plan for review by the
Community ' Development Department illustrating how the I existing
deficiencies will be remedied.
IRRIGATION: General lack of maintenance including inoperable automatic
timers, broken lines, missing sprinkler, improperly installed risers and
sprinkler heads, leaking valves.
The irrigation system shall be repaired to provide automatic and
adequate coverage of all landscaping areas.
TRASH ENCLOSURES: View -obscuring doors at all trash enclosures are
missing.
PARKING AND CIRCULATION/PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS: Asphalt parking surfaces
and concrete swales are cracked, buckled and severely damaged.
FIRE DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS: Code Violation
All Fire Lanes shall be restriped and stenciled. UFC 10.504(a)
All damage or faded Fire Lane signage shall be
replaced. UFC 10.504(a)
place all missing apartment lettering where required.UFC 10.301(a)
Repair dry wall in laundry room across from building
at 17273. UFC 10.603
[i
McFadden Village Apartments
February 22, 1996
Page 2
Remove combustibles from garage roof including
dead trees, rash and debris. UFC 11.302(a)
Remove illegal lighting stapled to stairway at
building at 17281. UFC 85.104
ADDRESS: 17271 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Exterior surface: stucco damage. HSC 17920.3(8)
Roof: water
damage, leaks.
HSC
17920.3(8)
Deck/Patio:
resurface, broken sheathing.
HSC
17920.3(8)
Stairs/landings: treads and guardrails rotted
and broken, stairs at unit F and H, railing
at J and L. HSC 17920.3(g)
Wall, Fences: water
damage, broken.
TCC
5502(m)(3)
17920.3(a)(6)
Driveways, walkways:
cracked, raised, uneven.
TCC
5502(m)(4)
HSC
Landscaping: not maintained, not properly
sloped to drain. TCC 5502 (m) (1)
Irrigation: broken pipes and heads, leaks. TCC 5502(m)(2)
Rain Gutter/Roof Drain: blocked and broken,
no drain covers. HSC 17920.3(8)
Water Heater: enclosure damaged walls. HSC 17920.3(e)
Interior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Unit A:
No heat.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Unit B:
Ceiling has water damage,
roof leaks.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Unit D:
Ceiling and walls have water
damage
from roof leaks.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Smoke detector missing or
inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit E:
Floor damp.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
No heat.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Roaches.
HSC
17920.3(a)(12)
Smoke detector mission or
inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit F:
Ceiling damage from roof
leaks.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Infestation of roaches.
HSC
17920.3(a)(12)
Unit G:
Shower pan cracked.
HSC
17920.3(e)
Infestation of roaches.
HSC
17920.3(a)(12)
*Fadden Village Apartments
-bruary 22, 1996
Page 3
Unit H: Bathroom ceiling, walls and
terior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Exterior surface: stucco damage with mold. HSC 17920.3(g)
Roof: water damage, leaks, fascia boards
are damaged. HSC 17920.3(8)
Drs/windows/Screens: missing some screens. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Wall, Fences: broken fence, water damage. TCC 5502(m)(3)
Driveways, walkways: broken walkway with
2" differential. TCC 5502(m)(4)
Landscaping: not maintained. TCC 5502(m)(1)
Irrigation: water leaks, broken heads, exposed. TCC 5502(m)(2)
Rain Gutter/Roof Drain: blocked or broken. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Water Heater: wall damage and electrical
damage at enclosure; no seismic bracing. HSC 17920.3(e).
Interior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Unit A: Carpet has been removed because of
floor dampness. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
fixtures damaged.
HSC
17920(a)(13)
Infestation of roaches.
HSC
17920.3(x)(12)
Water closet inoperable.
HSC
17920.3(e)
Leaky plumbing at lavatory sink,
no faucet or water to kitchen sink.
HSC
17920(3)(e)
Dampness of inhabitable rooms.
HSC
17920.3(a)(11)
Unit
I: Ceiling of bedroom has leak damage.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Lavatory sink leaks.
HSC
17920.3(e)
Unit
J: Ceiling damage from roof leak.
HSC
17920.3(x)(13)
Faucets leak.
HSC
17920.3(e)
Unit
K: No heat.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Infestation of roaches.
HSC
17920.3(a)(12)
Unit
L: Ceiling fallen off at bathroom and
damaged over bedroom, defective
roof joists.
HSC
17920.3(b)(6)
No heat.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Smoke detector missing or inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
ADDRESS:
17273 MCFADDEN AVENUE
terior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Exterior surface: stucco damage with mold. HSC 17920.3(g)
Roof: water damage, leaks, fascia boards
are damaged. HSC 17920.3(8)
Drs/windows/Screens: missing some screens. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Wall, Fences: broken fence, water damage. TCC 5502(m)(3)
Driveways, walkways: broken walkway with
2" differential. TCC 5502(m)(4)
Landscaping: not maintained. TCC 5502(m)(1)
Irrigation: water leaks, broken heads, exposed. TCC 5502(m)(2)
Rain Gutter/Roof Drain: blocked or broken. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Water Heater: wall damage and electrical
damage at enclosure; no seismic bracing. HSC 17920.3(e).
Interior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Unit A: Carpet has been removed because of
floor dampness. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
McFadden Village Apartments
February 22, 1996
Page 4
Unit B: Ceiling has roof leak damage.
Unit C: Lavatory leaks, kitchen faucet leaks
Water damage to bathroom ceiling.
Lack of adequate ventilation.
Lack of heat.
Infestation of roaches.
Unit D: Kitchen sink damage underside.
Bath has inadequate ventilation.
Water closet runs continuously.
ADDRESS: 17275 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions:
Exterior surface: stucco damage.
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(7)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(a)(7)
HSC 17920.3(e)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(8)
Roof: .water damage, broken sheathing and rafters. HSC 17920.3(g)
Drs/windows/screens: missing window screens. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Walls, fences: moisture damage.
Driveways, walkways: broken sidewalks and
pool decking.
Landscaping: Not maintained, inadequate slope
to drain.
Irrigation: leaks, and broken pipes.
Junk and debris: in pool area and bathrooms.
Rain Gutter/roof drains: blocked and no
drain cover.
Interior Substandard Conditions:
Recreation toilets not functional.
Ceiling and roof structure damaged.
Replace fire extinguisher.
Repair panic hardware at egress.
TCC 5502(m) (3)
TCC 5502 (m) (4)
TCC 5502(m)(1)
TCC 5502(m)(2)
TCC 5502(e)
HSC 17920.3(e)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(e)
UFC 10.603
UFC 10.505(a)
UFC 12.106(d)
Women's restroom must be re -converted back to original use.
ADDRESS: 17277 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions:
Code Violation
Exterior surface: stucco damage. HSC 17920.3(g)
Fadden village Apartments
rebruary 22, 1996
Page 5
Roof: water damage, leaks, blistering. HSC 17920.3(8)
Deck/Patio: stringers, railing, and treads
broken. HSC 17920.3(g)
Drs/windows/screens: missing some window screens. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Stairs/landings: all stairs rotted, termite
damaged and broken. HSC 17920.3(g)
Walls, fences: water damaged and termite damaged.
Also missing boards. TCC 5502(m)(3)
Driveway, walkways: broken, raised and uneven. TCC 5502(m)(4)
Landscaping: unmaintained condition. TCC 5502(m)(1)
Irrigation: exposed pipes, broken heads and
leaks. TCC 5502(m)(2)
Rain gutters/ roof drains: blocked, missing
drain covered. HSC 17920.3(g)
Water heater: wall damage inside enclosure. HSC 17920.3(e)
Interior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Unit A: Unit has extension cord extended
across sidewalk;
HSC
17920.3(d)
No heat.
HSC
17920.3(a)(12)
Unit B:
Kitchen sink leaks.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Inadequate bathroom ventilation.
HSC
17920.3(a)(7)
No heat.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Infestation of roaches.
HSC
17920.3(a)(12)
Unit C:
Ceiling water stained.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Smoke detector missing or inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit D:
Plumbing wall at corridor damaged.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Hole in hallway wall.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Unit E:
Roof leaks and deteriorated ceiling
at bedroom and hallway.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Dampness of inhabitable room.
HSC
17920.3(a)(11)
Smoke detector missing or inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit F:
Under sink damaged from lavatory leak.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
No heat.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Unit G:
Lavatory faucet leaks.
HSC
17920.3(x)(13)
Ceiling mildew in bath.
HSC
17920.3(x)(13)
Inadequate ventilation.
HSC
17920.3(a)(7)
No heat.
HSC
17920.3.(a)(6)
Smoke detector missing or inoperable-.
UFC
10.504(a)
McFadden Village Apartments
February 22, 1996
Page 6
ADDRESS: 17279 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions:
Exterior surface: stucco damage with mold
Roof: water standing, damaged, leaks.
Deck/Patio: surface damage.
Drs/windows/Screens: door screen missing on
some units.
Stairs, Landings: broken and termite damaged
Wall, Fences: water damage, termite damage.
Driveways, walkways: broken, raised, uneven.
Landscaping: not maintained.
Irrigation: broken heads, leaks.
Rain Gutter/Roof Drain: blocked, missing drain
cover, broken downspout.
Electric Panel: broken cover door, not secured
Water Heater: wall damage inside enclosure
Interior Substandard Conditions:
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(g)
TCC 5502(m)(3)
TCC 5502 (m) (4)
TCC 5502 (m) (1)
TCC 5502 (m) (2)
ASC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(e)
Code Violation
Unit B:
Kitchen sink leaks.
HSC
17920.3(e)
Ceiling in living room damaged.
HSC
17920.3(x)(13)
Inadequate ventilation.
HSC
17920.3ia)(7)
Unit C:
Kitchen sink leak damage underside.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Kitchen cabinets falling off.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Unit E:
Kitchen sink leaks.
HSC
17920.3(e)
Ceiling in bath is patched inadequately.HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
No heat.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Unit F:
Roof damaged ceiling from leaks.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Unit G:
Bathroom ceiling has a hole.
HSC
17920.3(x)(13)
Heater not accessible.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Smoke detector missing or inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit H:
Lavatory and kitchen sink leaks
underside.
HSC
17920.3(e)
Bedroom ceiling stained from leak.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Unit I:
Water leak from floor above.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Lavatory leaks.
HSC
17920.3(e)
Infestation of roaches.
HSC
17920.3(a)(12)
Cs
7adden Village Apartments
r. nruary 22, 1996
Page 7
No heat.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Deteriorated ceiling in bathroom.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Hazardous electrical light
in bathroom.
HSC
17920.3(d)
.Smoke detector missing or
inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit J: Ceiling leak damaged and bowed.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Infestation of roaches.
HSC
17920.3(a)(12)
Smoke detector missing or
inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit K: No heat.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Infestation of roaches.
HSC
17920.3(a)(12).
Smoke detector mission or
inadequate.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit L: Ceiling stained at living
room,
bedroom and hallway.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Smoke detector missing or
inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
ADDRESS: 17281 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions:
Exterior surface: stucco damage.
Roof: water standing, broken blisters, leaks.
Deck/Patio: surface and sheathing damage.
Stairs, Landings: treads, handrails and
guardrails. Replace damaged/loose railings and
treads to B, D, J, L, F and H.
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(g)
Exterior Fixtures: security light, wiring exposed.HSC 17920.3(d)
Wall, Fences: broken fence. TCC 5502(m)(3)
Driveways/walkways: broken and raised sidewalk
Rain Gutter: broken and missing.
Interior Substandard Conditions:
Unit A: Lavatory faucet leaks, kitchen sink
leak underside.
Smoke detector missing or inoperable
Unit B: Ceiling damage from roof leak.
No heat.
Smoke detector inoperable or missing
Unit D: Lavatory leaks underside.
Smoke detector missing.
Unit E: Kitchen sink faucet drips,
Bedroom ceiling stained.
Smoke detector inoperable or missing
TCC 5502 (m) (4)
HSC.17920.3(g)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(e)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(e)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
UFC 10.504(a)
McFadden Village Apartments
February 22, 1996
Page 8
Unit F: Electrical fixtures detached with
ADDRESS: 17283 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions:
Exterior surface: stucco damage, holes in wall
Roof: water damage, leaks, standing water.
Deck/Patio: resurface, broken sheathing.
Stairs/landings: replace damaged treads,
stringers, handrails, guardrails to unit A.
Interior Substandard Conditions:
HSC 17920.3(d)
HSC 17920.3(x)(12)
HSC 17920.3(x)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(11)
HSC 17920.3(a)(7)
HSC 17920.3(e)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(e) -
HSC 17920.3(x)(12)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(8)
Code Violation
Unit A: Ceiling has water damage and loose
plaster in hallway. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Smoke detectors missing or inoperable. UFC 10.504(a)
Unit B: Wall under the bathroom sink is .broken
and exposed to the outside. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Smoke detectors missing or inoperable. UFC 10.504(a)
ADDRESS: 17285 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Exterior surface: moisture damage. HSC 17920.3(8)
Roof: water damage, leaks, standing water. HSC 17920.3(g)
wiring exposed.
Infestation of
roaches.
Moldy walls in
bathroom.
Unit G:
Living room is
damp.
No ventilation
fan for bathroom.
Lavatory leaks
and particle board damp
Smoke detector
inoperable or missing.
Unit H:
Missing plaster
on kitchen ceiling.
Unit I:
Kitchen cabinet
falling off.
Smoke detector
inoperable or missing.
Unit J:
Kitchen sink leaks.
Unit K:
Shower floor is
cracked.
Unit L:
Clogged. kitchen
sink.
Infestation of
grain beetles.
ADDRESS: 17283 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions:
Exterior surface: stucco damage, holes in wall
Roof: water damage, leaks, standing water.
Deck/Patio: resurface, broken sheathing.
Stairs/landings: replace damaged treads,
stringers, handrails, guardrails to unit A.
Interior Substandard Conditions:
HSC 17920.3(d)
HSC 17920.3(x)(12)
HSC 17920.3(x)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(11)
HSC 17920.3(a)(7)
HSC 17920.3(e)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(e) -
HSC 17920.3(x)(12)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(8)
Code Violation
Unit A: Ceiling has water damage and loose
plaster in hallway. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Smoke detectors missing or inoperable. UFC 10.504(a)
Unit B: Wall under the bathroom sink is .broken
and exposed to the outside. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Smoke detectors missing or inoperable. UFC 10.504(a)
ADDRESS: 17285 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Exterior surface: moisture damage. HSC 17920.3(8)
Roof: water damage, leaks, standing water. HSC 17920.3(g)
C
7adden Village Apartments
bebruary 22, 1996
Page 9
Deck/Patio: surface damage.
Drs/windows/screens: missing window screens
Stairs/ landings: damaged treads, handrails,
guardrails, rot and termite damage. Replace
handrails, treads and guardrail to
units A, B,.0 and D.
Exterior Fixtures: illegal wiring of light fixture
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(8)
Interior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Unit A: Smoke detector missing or inoperable. UFC 10.504(a)
Unit'C: Heater not operating properly. HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
Smoke detector missing or inoperable. UFC 10.504(a)
Laundry room: broken drywall., missing vent cover ASC 17920.3(a)(13)
ADDRESS: 17287 MCFADDEN AVENUE
.terior Substandard Conditions:
Exterior surface: stucco damage.
Roof: water standing, damaged, leaks.
Deck/Patio: surface damage.
Stairs, Landings: treads, handrails termite
damage and broken; replace broken/damaged
treads and railings to units B, D, F and H.
Wall, Fences: fence at unit A is detached
from wall.
Water Heater: door to enclosure is damaged.
Interior Substandard Conditions:
Unit
A:
Broken window in living room.
Unit
C:
Crack in wall and ceiling of bathroom
Unit
D:
No heat.
Unit
E:.
Faucet leaks at kitchen sink and
underside leak, toilet does not flush
Heater not accessible.
Unit
F:
Ceiling damage and bowed.
Infestation of cockroaches.
Smoke detector missing or inoperable.
Unit
G:
Smoke detector missing or inoperable.
Unit
H:
Kitchen sink leaks underside.
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(8)
TCC 5502 (m) (3)
HSC 17920.3(8)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
HSC 17920.3(x)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
UFC 10.504(a)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(e)
McFadden Village Apartments
February 22, 1996
Page 10
ADDRESS: 17289 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation -
Exterior surface: stucco damage. HSC 17920.3(8)
Roof: water damage, leaks. HSC 17920.3(8)
Deck/Patio: resurface, broken sheathing. HSC 17920.3(8)
Drs/windows/screens: missing some window
screens. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Stairs/landings: replace damaged treads to
unit F. HSC 17920.3(g)
Driveways, walkways: broken, loose slab
and raised TCC 5502(m)(4)
Landscaping: not maintained TCC 5502(m)(1)
Irrigation: broken with leaks; puddling at
sidewalk. TCC 5502(m)(2)
Rain
Inadequate bathroom vents.
HSC
17920.3(a)(7)
Interior
Substandard Conditions:
No heat.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Smoke detector missing
Infestation of roaches.
HSC
17920.3(a)(12)
Unit I:
Ceiling in hallway stained from leak
HSC
17920.3(e)
Ceiling water stained,
from floor above.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
bowed at bathroom.
Smoke detector missing or inoperable..
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit J:
Ceiling damage from roof leak.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Unit K:
Smoke detector missing or inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit L:
Ceiling stain from leak.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
ADDRESS: 17289 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation -
Exterior surface: stucco damage. HSC 17920.3(8)
Roof: water damage, leaks. HSC 17920.3(8)
Deck/Patio: resurface, broken sheathing. HSC 17920.3(8)
Drs/windows/screens: missing some window
screens. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Stairs/landings: replace damaged treads to
unit F. HSC 17920.3(g)
Driveways, walkways: broken, loose slab
and raised TCC 5502(m)(4)
Landscaping: not maintained TCC 5502(m)(1)
Irrigation: broken with leaks; puddling at
sidewalk. TCC 5502(m)(2)
Rain
Gutter: broken and missing
downspout.
HSC 17920.3(8)
Interior
Substandard Conditions:
Code Violation
Unit A: Ceiling damage in living room from
plumbing leaks upstairs
unit.
HSC
17920.3(x)(13)
Damp floors.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Smoke detector missing
or inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit B; Kitchen sink leak.
HSC
17920.3(e)
Ceiling water stained,
damaged and
bowed at bathroom.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Smoke detector missing
or inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit C. Ceiling water stained in
hallway.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Infestation of roaches.
HSC
17920.3(a)(12)
Unit D: (No access provided.)
' Fadden Village Apartments
._nruary 22, 1996
Page 11
Unit E: Ceiling water stained in bedroom.
Lay. faucet leaks, water closet leaks.
Extremely heavy infestation of roaches.
Unit F: Missing window screens.
Unit G: Ceiling cracked and damaged from
water leak.
Wall under kitchen sink damaged, hole
in hallway wall.
Smoke detector missing or inoperable.
MG:kd\reports\mcfapts.att
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(x)(13)
HSC 17930.3(x)(13)
UFC 10.504(a)
ATTACHMENT B
TUSTIN CITY CODE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE
5502 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE NUISANCES
It is hereby declared to be.a public nuisance for any property
owner or other person in control of said property to keep or
maintain said property, including adjacent parkways, sidewalks or
streets under fee ownership by said person, in such manner that any
of the following conditions are found to exist:
TCC 5502
(m) Property failing to meet minimum levels of maintenance and
care as set forth as follows:
(1) Landscaping. All landscaping shall be maintained in a
healthy condition free of.dead, decayed, overgrown or -
discarded plant.material.
(2) Landscaping irrigation. Landscape irrigation.pipes and
sprinkler heads shall be maintained in good working order
so as to cover all landscaped areas.
(3) Walls, fences and other structures. All walls, fences
and trash enclosures and other structures shall be
maintained.free of significant surface cracks, dryrot,
warping, missing panels or blocks which either (i)
threaten structural integrity; or (ii) .result in a
dilapidated, decaying, disfigured, partially ruined,
appearance.
(4) Parking and related surfaces. Parking surfaces and
pedestrian walkways shall be maintained in a safe
condition such that any concrete, asphalt or other
driving or walking surfaces are free of potholes, buckled
or cracked surfaces or raised areas.
(5) Building elevations and roofs. Exterior building
surfaces and roofs shall be maintained free of
- - significant surface cracks, missing materials, warping,
dryrot or blocks, which either (i). threaten structural
integrity, or (ii) result in a dilapidated, decaying',
disfigured, partially ruined appearance.
(6) Trash and debris. The property shall be maintained free
of the accumulation of trash and debris. Trash and
debris associated with permitted uses are to be stored
solely in.designated trash enclosures.
Any violation of. subsection 5502(m)(5) is hereby declared to be a
misdeamoner. (Ord. No. 1080; Sec. 2, 11-18-91)
ATTACHMENT C
UNIFORM FIRE CODE
PREMISES IDENTIFICATION
Sec. 10.301(a) General. Approved numbers 'or addresses shall be
placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to
be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the
property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background.
MAINTENANCE
Sec. 10.504.(a) General. Sprinkler systems, fire hydrant systems,
standpipe systems, fire alarm systems; portable fite'extinguishers,
smoke and heat ventilators, smoke -removal systems and other fire -
protective or extinguishing systems or appliances shall be
maintained in an operative condition at all times and .shall be
replaced or repaired where defective. Fire -protection or
extinguishing systems coverage, spacing and specifications shall be
maintained in accordance with recognized standards at all times.
Such systems shall be extended, altered or augmented as necessary
to maintain and continue protectionwhenever any building so
equipped is altered, remodeled or added to. Additions, repairs,
alterations and servicing shall be in accordance with recognized
standards.
PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS
Sec. 10.505(a) General. Portable fire extinguishers. shall be
installed in'occupancies and locations as set forth in this code
and as required by the chief.
Portable fire extinguishers shall be in accordance with U.F.C.
standard No. 10-1.
INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISHES
Sec. 10.603. Interior wall and ceiling finishes shall be
maintained in accordance with the Building Code.
STORAGE AND ACCUMULATION OF RUBBISH AND VEGETATION
Sec. 11.302(a) Rubbish within and Adjacent to Buildings and.
Structures. Combustible rubbish kept or accumulated within or
adjacent to buildings or structures shall be stored in approved
containers or in rooms or vaults constructed of noncombustible
materials. Oily rags and similar materials shall be stored in
metal,. metal -lined or other approved containers equipped with
tightfitting covers. Combustible rubbish stored in containers
shall be"removed from buildings not less than -once each working
day.
t
Attachment C
Page 2
EXCEPTION: Commercial rubbish handling operations shall be in
accordance with Section 11.302(c)
DOORS
Sec. 12.106(d) Panic Hardware. Panic hardware, when installed,
shall comply with the requirements of the Building Code. The
activating member shall be mounted at a height of not less than 30
inches nor more than 44 inches above the floor. The unlatching
force shall not exceed 15 pounds when applied in the direction of
exit travel.
When balanced doors are used and panic hardware is required, panic -
hardware shall.be of the push -pad type and the pad shall not extend
across more than. one half of the width of the door measured from
the latch side.
ABATEMENT OF ELECTRICAL HAZARDS
Sec. 85.104. When electrical hazards are identified, measures to
abate such conditions shall be taken. Identified hazardous
electrical conditions in permanent wiring or temporary wiring shall
be corrected in cooperation with the authority enforcing the
Electrical Code.
Electrical wiring, devices, appliances and other equipment which
are modified or damaged and constitute an electrical shock or fire
hazard shall not be used.
MG:kd\reports\mcfad-at.bc
c
m SENDER:
a
•Cornplels hems 1 andror 2 for additional services.
I also wish to receive the
m
•Cornplele harts 3, 4a, and 4b.
following services (for an
m
•Pdrd your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this
extra fee):
card to you.
Attach this form to the from of the mailpie®, or on the back if space does not
t, ❑ Addressee's Address
m
Permit.
it
a
• Write 'Return Receipt Requested' on the malpiece below the article number.
2 ❑ Restricted Delivery
rm
•The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
ii
delivered. -
Consult postmaster for fee.+.
m
3. Article Addressed to:
4a. Article Number
a
PAI INVESTMENTS, INC.
P 476 994 489
E
3745 W. CHAPMAN AVE., STE 205
4b. Service Type
a
ORANGE, CA 92668
❑ Registered [A Certified
W
❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured
S
m
cl
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD
°
i
7. at f el'
0
T
5. Received By. (Print Name)
8. Addressee's Address (Only ffrequested
(r4i<r�?Ai
and fee is paid)
m
g
6. Signature: (Addressee or ant
o
m
PS Form 3811, December 1994
Domestic Retum Receipt
P
-r�Ii1C^w.evti�.).n�"�._
P 476 994 489
us Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for International Mail See reverse
PWTINVESTMENTS- INC.
% "YTlr
. CHAPMAN AVE.,STE20
6y5MftS'aleC& "�Le668
Poste $
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
N
&Wm Recaps Showing to
Whom h Date Delivered
.6 ReUsn
Re: Sha4'iS IOYlhom,
< Date, 6 Addressees Address
O TOTAL Postage S Fees $
co
M Pwt ark or Date
E
`o
LL
Ul
o.
BOARD OF APPEALS REPORT
ATTACHMENT "B"
l
S
CITY OF TUSTIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BOARD OF APPEALS
HEARING APPLICATION
PROJECT INFORMATION.-
Address
NFORMATION:Addres
Legal Desaipuon.
Assessor's Parcel Number r - - .,
Type of Construction
occupancy Classification .
APPLICANT INFORMATION: Applicant 11V,, � - i,_ I /' /•���n
Applicant Name 1 J— + l/
Address ?�l,S It � r
PhoneNurnbcr 11
Board of Appeals Members. .. .
In accordance with the provisions of Uniform Administrative Codc.Section 204(a). I hereby request a hearing before the
City of Tustin Board of Appeals. I wish to contest the decision or interpretation of the Building Oficial regarding the
following. . , I t _ _ I - ._ - _ .,I -JC, , r �TLf
i am aware that the Board of Appeals shall have no authority relative to interpretation of the administrative provisions of
the code nor shall the board empowered to waive requirements of the technical codes.
Applicam Signaaturt - ate .
Hearing Fec -�> 156 , G a - Hearing Date
x. Building Official
Community Development Director
I
Y City of M.istin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92680
(714) 573-3000
CITY OF TUSTIN 02177f
WM MAR 205 19',65 10:38 AM ReG 4
LLalidation REceipt
MARGES-
0i030000004795
014795 SUNDRY REVENUE 1.5a Af
PAYMENT -
Cash F i r 150, 1j
Chance :=+xxT+# #fi,IU
BOARD OF APPEALS REPORT
ATTACHMENT "C"
Community Development Department
City of Tustin
March 25, 1996 300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
Pai Investments, Inc.
Director
3745 W. Chapman Avenue, Suite 205
(714)573-3031
Orange, California 92668
Planning & Zoning Into.
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF BOARD OF APPEALS HEARING
(714)573.3140
Building
Dear Mr. Pai :
(714) 573-3131
(714)573-3132
Pursuant to Section 204 of the Uniform
Administrative
Housing
Code, Notice is hereby given that the
Board of Appeals
(714)573.3117
for the City of Tustin will hear your
appeal on Monday,
April 8, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
code Enforcement
(714)573.31x4
The appellant is contesting the Notice
and Order of the
Business License
Building Official dated February 22,
1996, regarding
(714)573-3144
17271-17289 McFadden Avenue, Tustin.
Inspection Requests
(714)573-3141
The appeal hearing will be held in
the Tustin City
Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way,
Tustin.
Graffiti Hot Line
(714) 573-3111
If you have any questions, please call
me at (714) 573-
FAX Machine
313 0 .
(714) 573-3113
Sincerely,
`(
�c �:,-,X 1
Rick Brown
Building Official
R3:br:paiapp1.1cr
cc: Elizabeth Binsack, Community Development Director
Lois Jeffrey, City Attorney
CERTIFIED MAIL #PO10 680 431
CITY OF TUSTIN
OFFICIAL NOTICE
BOARD OF APPEALS
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeals for. the City of
Tustin, California, will conduct an appeal hearing on April 8,
1996, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial
Way, Tustin, California to consider the following:
If you challenge the subject item in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence
delivered to the City of Tustin at, or prior to, the public
hearing.
If you require special accommodations,* please contact the Building
Official at (714) 573-3130.
Information relative to this item is on file in the Community
Development Department and is available for public inspection at
City Hall. Anyone interested in the information above may call the
Community Development Department at (714) 573-3130.
Pamela Stoker, City Clerk
Publish: Tustin Weekly
March 29, 1996
/� If you require special accommodations, please contact Tustin City Hall, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin 92680, (714) 573-3000.
BOARD OF APPEALS REPORT
ATTACHMENT "D"
J. -
201-202.5
1994 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
Chapter 2
ORGANIZATION AND ENFORCEMENT
SECTION 201 — AUTHORITY
201.1 Creation of Enforcement Agency. There is hereby established in this jurisdiction a code
enforcement agency which shall be under the administrative and operational control of thebuilding
official.
201.2 General. Whenever the term or title "administrative authority," "responsible official,"
"building official," "chief inspector," "code enforcement officer," or other similar designation is
used herein or in any of the technical codes, it shall be construed to mean the building official desig-
nated by the appointing authority of this jurisdiction. .
SECTION 202 — POWERS AND DUTIES OF BUILDING OFFICIAL
202.1 General. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to enforce all the provi-
sions of this code and the referenced technical codes. For such purposes, the building official shall
have the powers of a law enforcement officer.
The building official shall have the power to render interpretations of this code and the referenced
technical codes, and to adopt and enforce rules and regulations supplemental to this code as may be
deemed necessary in order to clarify the application of the provisions of this code. Such interpreta-
tions, rules and regulations shall be in conformity with the intent and purpose of this code.
202.2 Deputies. In accordance with prescribed procedures and with the approval of the appoint-
ing authority, the building official may appoint such number of technical officers and inspectors and
other employees as shall be authorized from time to time. The building official may deputize such
inspectors or employees as may be necessary to catty out the functions of the code enforcement
agency.
202.3 Right of Entry. When necessary to make an inspection to enforce any of the provisions of
this code and the technical codes, or when the building official has reasonable cause to believe that
there exists in any building or upon a premises a condition which is contrary to or in violation of this
code which makes the building or premises unsafe, dangerous or hazardous, the building official
may enter the building or premises at all reasonable times to inspect or to perform the duties im-
posed by this code, provided that if such building or premises be occupied, that credentials be pres-
ented to the occupant and entry requested. If such building or premises be unoccupied, the building
official shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or other persons having charge or
control of the building or premises and request entry. Should entry be refused, the building official
shall have recourse to the remedies provided by law to secure entry.
202.4 Stop Orders. When work is being done contrary to the provisions of this code, the technical
codes, or other pertinent laws or ordinances implemented through the enforcement of this code. the
building official may order the work stopped by notice in writing served on persons engaged in the
doing or causing such work to be done, and such persons shall forthwith stop the work until autho-
rized by the building official to proceed with the work.
2025 Occupancy Violations. When a building or structure or building service equipment therein
regulated by this code and the technical codes is being used contrary to the provisions of such codes,
the building official may order such use discontinued by written notice served on any person caus-
ing such use to be continued. Such person shall discontinue the use within the time prescribed by the
building official after receipt of such notice to make the structure, or portion thereof, comply with
the requirements of such codes.
1994 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
202.6-203
202.6 Authority to Disconnect Utilities. The building official or the building official's autho-
rized representative shall have the authority to disconnect a utility serviceorenergy supplied to the
building, structure or building service equipment therein regulated by this code or the technical
codes in case of emergency where necessary to eliminate an immediate hazard to life or property.
The building official shall whenever possible notify the serving utility, the owner and occupant of
the building, structure or building service equipment of the decision to disconnect prior to taking
such action, and shall notify such serving utility, owner and occupant of the building, structure or
building service equipment, in writing, of such disconnection immediately thereafter.
202.7 Authority to Condemn Building Service Equipment. When the building official ascer-
tains that building service equipment regulated in the technical codes has become hazardous to life,
health or property, or has become insanitary, the building official shall order in writing that such
equipment either be removed or restored to a safe or sanitary condition, as appropriate. The written
notice itself shall fix a time limit for compliance with such order. Defective building service equip-
ment shall not be maintained after receiving such notice. .
When such equipment or installation is to be disconnected, a written notice of such disconnection
and causes therefor shall be given within 24 hours to the serving utility, the owner and occupant of
such building, structure or premises.
When any building service equipment is maintained in violation of the technical codes and in
violation of a notice issued pursuant to the provisions of this section, the building official shall insti-
tute appropriate action to prevent, restrain, correct or abate the violation.
202.8 Connection after Order to Disconnect. Persons shall ndt make connections from an ener-
gy, fuel or power supply nor supply energy or fuel to building service equipment which has been
disconnected or ordered to be disconnected by the building official or the use of which has been
ordered to be discontinued by the building official until the building official authorizes the recon-
nection -and use of such equipment.
202.9Liability. The building official charged with the enforcement of this code and the technical
codes, acting in good faith and without malice in the discharge of his duties, Shall not thereby be
rendered personally liable for damage that may accrue to persons or property as a result of an act or
omission in the discharge of the assigned duties. A suit brought against the building official orem-
ployee because of such act or omission performed by the building official or employee in the en-
forcement of the provisions of such codes or other pertinent laws or ordinances implemented
through the enforcement of this code or enforced by the code enforcement agency shall be defended
by this jurisdiction until fmal termination of such proceedings, and any judgment resulting there-
from shall be assumed by this jurisdiction.
This code shall not be construed to relieve from or lessen the responsibility of any person owning,
operating or controlling a building, structure or building service equipment therein for damages to
persons or property caused by defects, nor shall the code enforcement agency or its parent jurisdic-
tion be held as assuming such liability by reason of the inspections authorized by this code or per-
mits or certificates issued under this code.
202.L0 Cooperation of Other Officials and Officers. The building official may request, and
shall receive, the assistance and cooperation of other officials of this jurisdiction so far as is required
in the discharge of the duties required by this code or other pertinent laws or ordinances.
SECTION 203— UNSAFE BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES OR BUILDING SERVICE
EQUIPMENT
Buildings or structures regulated by this code and the technical codes which are structurally inade-
quate or have inadequate egress, or which constitute a fire hazard, or are otherwise dangerous to
human life are, for the purpose of this section, unsafe buildings.
203-205
1994 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
Building service equipment regulated by such codes, which constitutes afire, electrical or health
hazard, or an insanitary condition, or is otherwise dangerous to human life is, for the purpose of this
section, unsafe. Use of buildings, structures or building service equipment constituting a hazard to
safety, health or public welfare by reason of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, obsolescence, ,
fun hazard, disaster, damage or abandonment is, for the purpose of this section, an unsafe use.
Parapet walls, comites, spires, towers, tanks, statuary and other appendages or structural mem-
bers which are supported by, attached to, or a part of a building and which are in a deteriorated con-
dition or otherwise unable to sustain the design loads which are specified in the Building Code are
hereby designated as unsafe building appendages.
Unsafe buildings, structures or appendages and building service equipment are hereby declared
to be public nuisances and shall be abated by repair, rehabilitation, demolition or removal in accor-
dance with the procedures set forth in the Dangerous Buildings Code or such alternate procedure as
may be adopted by this jurisdiction. As an alternative, the building official or other employee or
official of this jurisdiction as designated by the governing body may institute other appropriate ac-
tion to prevent, restrain, correct or abate the violation. ,
SECTION 204 — BOARD OF APPEALS
�D• 204.1 General. In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions ordeterminationsmade by
the building official relative to the application and interpretations of the technical code, there shall
be and is hereby created a board of appeals consisting of members who are qualified by experience
and training to pass upon matters pertaining to building construction and building service equip-
ment and who are not employees of the jurisdiction. The building official shall be an ex officio
member and shall act as secretary to said board but shall have no vote upon any matter before the
board. The board of appeals shall be appointed by the governing body and shall hold office at its
pleasure. The board shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its business and shall render all
decisions and findings in writing to the appellant with a duplicate copy to the building official.
204.2 Limitations of Authority. The board of appeals shall have no authority relative to interpre-
tation of the administrative provisions of this code or the administrative provisions of the technical
codes nor shall the board be empowered to waive requirements of either this code or the technical
codes.
p. SECTION 205— VIOLATIONS
It shall be unlawful fora person, fine or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move,
improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building, structure or
building service equipment or cause or permit the same to be done in violation of this code and the
technical codes.
_ 3
3
B
201-202
1994 UNIFORM HOUSING CODE
Chapter 2
ENFORCEMENT
SECTION 201 —GENERAL
201.1 Authority. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to enforce all of the pro-
. _ visions of this code. For such purposes, the building official shall have the powers of a law enforce-
ment officer.
The building official shall have the power to render interpretations of this code and to adopt and
enforce rules and supplemental regulations in order to clarify the application of its provisions. Such
interpretations, rules and regulations shall be in conformity with the intent and purpose of this code.
201.2 Right of Entry. When it is necessary to make an inspection to enforce the provisions of this
code, or when the building official has reasonable rause to believe that there exists in a building or
upon a premises a condition which is contrary to or in violation of this code which makes the build-
ing or premises unsafe, dangerous or hazardous, the building official may enter the building or
premises at reasonable times to inspect or to perform the duties imposed by this code, provided that
if such building or premises be occupied that credentials be presented to the occupant and entry
requested. If such building or premises be unoccupied, the building official shall fust make a rea-
sonable effort to locate the owner or other person having charge or control of the building or prem-
ises and request entry. If entry is refused, the building official shall have recourse to the remedies
provided by law to secure entry.
2013 Responsibilities Defined. Owners remain liable for violations of duties imposed by this
code even though an obligation is also imposed on the occupants of the building, and even though
the owner has, by agreement, imposed on the occupant the duty of furnishing required equipment or
of complying with this code.
Buildings and structures and parts thereof shall be maintained in a safe and sanitary condition.
The owner or the owner's designated agent shall beresponsible forsuch maintenance. To determine
compliance with this subsection, the building may be reinspected.
Owners, in addition to being responsible for maintaining buildings in a sound structural condi-
tion, shall be responsible for keeping that par of the building or premises which the owner occupies
- or controls in a clean, sanitary and safe condition, including the shared or public areas in a building
containing two or more dwelling units.
Owners shall, when required by this code, the health ordinance or the health officer, furnish and
maintain such approved sanitary facilities as required, and shall furnish and maintain approved de-
vices, equipment or facilities for the prevention of insect and rodent infestation, and when infesta-
tion has taken place, shall be responsible for the extermination of any insects, rodents or other pests
when such extermination is not specifically made the responsibility of the occupant by law or rul-
ing.
Occupants of a dwelling unit, in addition to being responsible forkeeping in a clean, sanitary and
safe condition that part of the dwelling or dwelling unit or premises which they occupy and control,
shall dispose of their rubbish, garbage and other organic waste in a manner required by the health
ordinance and approved by the health officer.
Occupants shall, when required by this code, the health ordinance or the health officer, furnish
and maintain approved devices, equipment or facilities necessary to keep their premises safe and
sanitary.
SECTION 202—SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS
Buildings or portions thereof which are determined to be substandard as defined in this code are
hereby declared to be public nuisances and shall be abated by repair, rehabilitation, demolition or
removal in accordance with the procedure specified in Chapter 11 of this code.
2
1994 UNIFORM HOUSING CODE
SECTION 203 — HOUSING ADVISORY AND APPEALS BOARD
203-204
203.1 General. In order to hearand decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by
the building official relative to the application and interpretations of this code, there shall be and is
hereby created a housing advisory and appeals board consisting of members who are qualified by
experience and training to pass upon matters pertaining to building construction and who are not
employees of the jurisdiction. The building official shall be an ex officio member and shall act as
secretary to said board but shall have no vote upon any matter before the board. The housing adviso-
ry and appeals board shall be appointed by the governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure.
The board shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its business and shall render all decisions
and findings in writing to the appellant with a duplicate copy to the building official. Appeals to the
board shall be processed in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 1201 of this code.
Copies of all rules of procedure adopted by the board shall be delivered to the building official, who
shall make them accessible to the public.
203.2 Limitations of Authority. The housing advisory and appeals board shall have no authority
relative to interpretation of the administrative provisions of this code nor shall the board be empow-
ered to waive requirements of this code.
SECTION 204 — VIOLATIONS
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair,
move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building or struc-
ture or cause or permit the same to be done in violation of this code.
201-205.1
SECTION 201 — GENERAL
1994 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS
Chapter 2
ENFORCEMENT
201.1 Administration. The building official is hereby authorized to enforce the provisions ofthis
code.
The building official shall have the power to render interpretations of this code and to adopt and
enforce rules and supplemental regulations in orderto clarify the application of its provisions. Such
interpretations, rules and regulations shall be in conformity with the intent and purpose of this code.
201.2 Inspections. The health officer, the fire marshal and the building official are hereby autho-
rized to make such inspections and take such actions as may be required to enforce the provisions of
this code. '
201.3 Right of Entry. When it is necessary to make an inspection to enforce the provisions of this
code, or when the building official or the building official's authorized representative has reason-
able cause to believe that there exists in a building or upon a premises a condition which is contrary
to or in violation of this code which makes the building or premises unsafe, dangerous or hazardous,
the building official may enter the building or premises at reasonable times to inspect or to perform
the duties imposed by this code, provided that if such building or premises be occupied that creden-
tials be presented to the occupant and entry requested. If such building or premises be unoccupied,
the building official shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or other persons having
charge or control of the building or premises and request entry. If entry is refused, the building offi-
cial shall have recourse to the remedies provided by law to secure entry.
"Authorized representative" shall include the officers named in Section 201.2 and their autho-
rized inspection personnel.
SECTION 202 — ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS
All buildings or portions thereof which are determined after inspection by the building official to be
dangerous as defined in this code are hereby declared to be public nuisances and shall be abated by
repair, rehabilitation, demolition or removal in accordance with the procedure specified in Section
401 of this code.
+011ft•7ZFA-1kIrl WW_tILai 2&1
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair,
move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building or struc-
ture or cause or permit the same to be done in violation of this code.
SECTION 204 — INSPECTION OF WORK
All buildings or structures within the scope of this code and all construction or work for which a
permit is required shall be subject to inspection by the building official in accordance with and in the
manner provided by this code and Sections 108 and 1701 of the Building Code.
SECTION 205 — BOARD OF APPEALS
205.1 General. In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions ordeteiminationsmade by
the building official relative to the application and interpretations of this code, there shall be and is
hereby created a board of appeals consisting of members who are qualified by experience and train-
---------------------
1994 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS 205.1-205.2
ing to pass upon matters pertaining to building construction and who are not employees of the juris-
diction. The building official shall be an ex officio member and shall act as secretary to said board
but shall have no vote upon any matter before the board. The board of appeals shall be appointed by
the governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure. The board shall adopt rules of procedure for
conducting its business and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the appellant, with a
duplicate copy to the building official. Appeals to the board shall be processed in accordance with
the provisions contained in Section 501 of this code. Copies of all rules or regulations adopted by
the board shall be delivered to the building official, who shall make them freely accessible to the
public.
205.2 Limitations of Authority. The board of appeals shall have no authority relative tointerpre-
tation of the administrative provisions of this code nor shall the board be empowered to waive re-
quirements of this code.
3
401-401.3 1994 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS r
Chapter 4
NOTICES AND ORDERS OF BUILDING OFFICIAL
SECTION 401 — GENERAL
401.1 Commencement of Proceedings. When the building official has inspected or caused to be
inspected any building and has found and determined that such building is a dangerous building, the
building official shall commence proceedings to cause the repair, vacation or demolition of the
building.
401.2 NoticeandOrder. The building official shall issue a notice and order directed to the record
owner of the building. The notice and order shall contain:
1. The street address and a legal description sufficient for identification of the premises upon.
which the building is located.
2. A statement that the building official has found the building to be dangerous with a brief and
concise description of the conditions found to render the building dangerous under the provisions of
Section 302 of this code.
3. A statement of the action required to be taken as determined by the building official.
3.1 If the building official has determined that the building or structure must be repaired, the
order shall require that all required permits be secured therefor and the work physically
commenced within such time (not to exceed 60 days from the date of the order) and com-
pleted within such time as the building official shall determine is reasonable under all of
the circumstances.
3.2 If the building official has determined that the building or structure must be vacated, the
order shall require that the building or structure shall be vacated within a time certain
from the date of the order as determined by the building official to be reasonable.
3.3 If the building official has determined that the building or structure must be demolished,
the order shall require that the building be vacated within such time as the building offi-
cial shall determine is reasonable (not to exceed 60 days from the date of the order); that
all required permits be secured therefor within 60 days from the date of the order, and that
the demolition be completed within such time as the building official shall determine is
reasonable.
4. Statements advising that if any required repair or demolition work (without vacation also be-
ing required) is not commenced within the time specified, the building official (i) will order the
building vacated and posted to prevent further occupancy until the work is completed, and (ii) may
proceed to cause the work to be done and charge the costs thereof against the property or its owner.
5. Statements advising (i) that any person.having any record title or legal interest in the building
may appeal from the notice and order or any action of the building official to the board of appeals,
provided the appeal is made in writing as provided in this code and filed with the building official
within 30 days from the date of service of such notice and order, and (ii) that failure to appeal will
constitute a waiver of all right to an administrative hearing and determination of the matter. .
401.3 Service of Notice -and Order. The notice and order, and any amended or supplemental no-
tice and order, shall be served upon the record owner and posted on the property; and one copy
thereof shall be served on each of the following if known to the building official or disclosed from
official public records: the holder of any mortgage or deed of trust or other lien or encumbrance of
record; the owner or holder of any lease of record; and the holder of any other estate or legal interest
of record in or to the building or the land on which it is located. The failure of the building official to
serve any person required herein to be served shall not invalidate any proceedings hereunder as to
any other person duly served or relieve any such person from any duty or obligation imposed by the
provisions of this section.
s ��
1994 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS 401.4-404.1
401.4 Method of Service. Service of the notice and order shall be made upon all persons entitled
thereto either personally or by mailing a copy of such notice and order by certified mail, postage
prepaid, return receipt requested, to each such person at their address as it appears on the last equal-
ized assessment roll of the county or as (mown to the building official. If no address of any such
person so appears or is known to the building official, then a copy of the notice and order shall be so
mailed, addressed to such person, at the address of the building involved in the proceedings. The
failure of any such person to receive such notice shall not affect the validity of any proceedings
taken under this section. Service by certified mail in the manner herein provided shall be effective
c` on the date of mailing.
4015 Proof orService. Proof of service of the notice and order shall be certified to at the time of
service by a written declaration under penalty of perjury executed by the persons effecting service,
declaring the time, date and manner in which service was made. The declaration, together with any
receipt card returned in acknowledgment of receipt by certified mail shall be affixed to the copy of
the notice and order retained by the building official.
SECTION 402 — RECORDATION OF NOTICE AND ORDER
If compliance is not had with the order within the time specified therein, and no appeal has been
properly and timely filed, the building official shall file in the office of the county recorder a certifi-
cate describing the property and certifying (i) that the building is a dangerous building and (ii) that
the owner has been so notified. Whenever the corrections ordered shall thereafter have been com-
pleted or the building demolished so that it no longer exists as a dangerous building on the property
described in the certificate, the building official shall file a new certificate with the county recorder
certifying that the building has been demolished or all required corrections have been made so that
the building is no longer dangerous, whichever is appropriate.
SECTION 403 — REPAIR, VACATION AND DEMOLITION
The following standards shall be followed by the building official (and by the board of appeals if an.
( appeal is taken) in ordering the repair, vacation or demolition of any dangerous building or struc-
ture:
1. Any building declared a dangerous building under this code shall be made to comply with one
of the following:
1.1 The building shall be repaired in accordance with the current building code or other cur-
rent code applicable to the type of substandard conditions requiring repair, or
1.2 The building shall be demolished at the option of the building owner, or
1.3 If the building does not constitute an immediate danger to the life, limb, property or safety
of the public it may be vacated, secured and maintained against entry.
2. If the building or structure is in such condition as to make it immediately dangerous to the life,
limb, property or safety of the public or its occupants, it shall be ordered to be vacated.
r
SECTION 404 — NOTICE TO VACATE
404.1 Pasting. Every notice to vacate shall, in addition to being served as provided in Section
401.3, be posted at or upon each exit of the building and shall be in substantially the following form:
DO NOT ENTER
UNSAFE TO OCCUPY
It is a misdemeanor to occupy this building, or to remove or
deface this notice.
Building Official
.......of.......
4. irjJ4ii�y
404,2 - 1994 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS j
404.2 Compliance. Whenever such notice is posted, the building official shall include a notifica-
tion thereof in the notice and order issued under Section 401.2, reciting the emergency and specify-
ing the conditions which necessitate the posting. No person shall remain in or enter any building
which has been so posted, except that entry may be made to repair, demolish or remove such build-
ing under permit. No person shall remove or deface any such notice after it is posted until the re-
quired repairs, demolition or removal have been completed and a certificate of occupancy issued
pursuant to the provisions of the Building Code.
1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
Appendix Chapter 15
REROOFING
SECTION 1514—GENERAL
APPENDIX CHAPTER 15
All reroofing shall conform to, the applicable provisions of Chapter 15 of this code.
Roofing materials and methods of application shall comply with the U.B.C. standards or shall
follow manufacturer's installation requirements when approved by the building official.
SECTION 1515 — INSPECTIONS
New roof coverings shall not be applied without first obtaining an inspection by the building offi-
cial and written approval from the building official. A final inspection and approval shall be ob-
tained from the building official when the reroofing is complete. The preroofing inspection shall
pay particular attention to evidence of accumulation of water. Where extensive ponding of water is
apparent, an analysis of the roof structure for compliance with Section 1506 shall be made and cor-
rective measures, such as relocation of roof drains or scuppers, resloping of the roof or structural
changes, shall be made.
1' An inspection report covering the above -listed topics prepared by a special inspector may be ac-
cepted in lieu of the preinspection by the building official.
SECTION 1516 — BUILT-UP ROOFS
C. 1516.1 General. Built-up roof covering shall be completely removed before applying the new
roof covering. New roofing conforming to Section 1503 shall be applied except that when the new
roof is to be applied directly to a nailable deck which has residual bitumen adhering to it, a rosin -
sized or other dry sheet shall be installed prior to the installation of the new roof system.
EXCEPTION: The building official may allow existing roof coverings to remain when inspection or
other evidence reveals all of the following:
I. That the roof structure is sufficient to sustain the weight of the additional dead load of the roof covering.
2. There is not more than one existing roof covering on the structure.
3. The existing roof covering is securely attached to the deck.
4. The roof deck is structurally' sound.
5. The existing insulation is not water soaked.
1516.2 Preparation of Roof and Application of New Covering.
1516.2.1 General. When reroofing without removal of existing roof coverings is permitted by the
building official and when the conditions specified in the exceptions to Section 1516.1 above have
been met, the reroofing shall be accomplished in accordance with this section.
1516.2.2 Over gravel -surfaced roof coverings. Over gravel -surfaced roof coverings, the roof
shall be cleaned of all loose gravel and debris. All blisters, buckles and other irregularities shall be
cut and made smooth and secure. Minimum 3/8 -inch (9.5 mm) insulation board shall be nailed or
securely cemented to the existing roofing with hot bitumen over which a new roof complying with
Section 1503 shall be installed. When insulation board is to be attached with hot bitumen, the exist-
ing surface shall be primed.
Alternatively, on nailable decks only, all existing gravel shall be spudded off to provide a smooth
l surface. All blisters, buckles and other irregularities shall be cut and made smooth and secure. A
rosin -sized or other dry sheet shall be installed and a base sheet as defined in the code shall be me-
chanically fastened in place. New roofing conforming to Section 1503 shall be applied.
1-427
APPENDIX CHAPTER 15 1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
1516.23 Over smooth or cap -sheet surface. Over smooth orcap-sheet surfaced roof coverings,
all blisters, buckles and other irregularities shall be cut and made smooth and secure. In the case of - -
nonnailable decks, a base sheet shall be spot cemented to the existing roofing. New roofing con- '•``
forming to Section 1503 shall be applied.
In the case of nailable decks, a base sheet shall be nailed in place. In those cases where residual
materials may cause the new base sheet to adhere to the old roof, a rosin -sized dry or other sheet
shall be installed under the base sheet. New roofing conforming to Section 1503 shall be applied.
15163 Construction Details.
15163.1 Flashings and edgings. Vent flashings, metal edgings, drain outlets, metal counter-
flashing and collars shall be removed and cleaned. Rusted metal shall be replaced. Metal shall be
primed with cutback primerprior to installation. Collars and flanges shall be flashed per the roofing
manufacturer's instructions.
15163.2 Intersecting walls. All concrete and masonry walls shall be completely cleaned and
primed to receive new flashing. All vertical walls, other than concrete or masonry, shall have the
surface finish material removed to aheight of approximately 6 inches (153 mm) above the deck new
.� roof surface to receive new roofing and flashing. All rotted wood shall bereplaced with new materi-
als. Surface finish material shall be replaced. -
151633 Parapets. Parapets of area separation walls shall have noncombustible faces, including
counterflashing and coping materials.
- EXCEPTION: Combustible roofing may extend 7 inches (178 mm) above the roof surface.
1516.3.4 Cant strips. Where space permits, cant strips shall be installed at all angles. All angles j
shall be flashed with at least two more layers than in the new roof with an exposed finish layer of
inorganic felt or mineral surfaced cap sheet.
SECTION 1517 — SHINGLES AND SHAKES im
1517.1 General. Based on inspection of the existing roofing, the building official may permit the
recovering of existing shingle or shake roofing in accordance with the provisions of this section.
15171 Asphalt Shingle Application. Not more than two overlays of asphalt shingles shall be
applied over an existing asphalt shingle roof.
Not more than two overlays of asphalt shingle roofing shall be applied over wood shingles. As-
phalt shingles applied over wood shingles shall have an overlay underlayment of not less than Type
30 nonperforated felt.
On structures with a slope of 2 units vertical in 12 units horizontal (16.66 % slope) or greater and
having no more than one existing built-up roof. one overlay of asphalt shingles may be applied,
provided:
1. If the built-up roof has a gravel surface, the gravel must first be spudded off to provide a
smooth surface. All blisters and irregularities shall be cut and made smooth and secure and an un-
derlayment of not less than Type 30 nonperforated felt shall be installed.
2. If the built-up roof has a smooth or cap -sheet surface, all blisters and irregularities shall be cut
and made smooth and secure and an underlayment of not less than Type 30 nonperforated felt shall
be installed.
15173 Wood Shake Application. Not more than one overlay of wood shakes shall be applied
over an existing asphalt shingle or wood shingle roof [with one layer of I8 -inch (457 mm), Type 30
nonperforated felt interlaced between each layer of shakes). \
1517.4 Wood Shingle Application. Not more than one overlay of wood shingles shall be applied
over existing wood shingles.
1-428
�c
1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE APPENDIX CHAPTER 15
15175 Application over Shakes. New roof covering shall not be applied over an existing shake
roof.
1517.6 Flashing and Edgings. Rusted or damaged flashing, vent caps and metal edgings shall be
replaced with new materials as necessary.
1517.7 Reroofing. When the application of anew roof covering over wood shingle or shake roofs
creates a combustible concealed space, the combustible concealed space shall be filled with the ma-
terials listed in Section 708.2.2.
SECTION 1518 —TILE
Tile roofs maybe applied overexisting roof coverings when approved by the building official. Such
installations shall be substantiated by structural data indicating that the existing or modified roof -
framing system is adequate to support the additional tile roof covering.
Existing tile roofing shall be removed and cleaned. Damaged or rusted flashing and cracked or
broken tile shall be replaced. Tile shall be applied in accordance with the requirements of Section
1507.7 (application of clay or concrete tile) and in conformance with the original manufacturer's
specifications.
EXCEPTION: When the original manufacturer's specificationsare ano longer available, the tile may be
reinstalled to match the prior installation except that clay and tertacotta hips and ridge the shall be reinstalled
with Portland cement mortar.
SECTION 1519 — METAL ROOFING
C
Reroofing with metal roofing shall be in accordance with the original manufacturer's specifications
or when the original manufacturer's specifications are no longer available as required by Section
' 1507.8.
SECTION 1520 — SPRAY POLYURETHANE FOAM ROOFS
1520.1 General. Spray -applied polyurethane foam maybe applied directly to an existing built-up
roofing system when the completed assembly is a Class A, B or C roof covering that meets the cri-
teria in Section 2602.5.3. When applied on a fire -resistive roof -ceiling assembly, the completed
assembly shall comply with Section 710.1. .
1520.2 Inspection of Existing Roof. The building official may allow existing roof coverings to
remain when inspection or other evidence reveals all of the following:
1. That the roof structure is sufficient to sustain the weight of the additional dead load of the roof
covering.
2. The existing roof covering is securely attached to the deck.
3. The roof deck is structurally sound.
r 4. The existing insulation is not water soaked.
1520.3 Preparation of Roof and Application of New Covering.
1520.3.1 General. When reroofing without removal of existing roof coverings is permitted bythe
building official and when the conditions specified in Section 1520.2 above have been met, the re-
roofing shall be accomplished in accordance with this section.
1520.3.2 Over gravel -surfaced roof coverings. Over gravel -surfaced roof coverings, the roof
shall be cleaned of all loose gravel and debris. All blisters, buckles and other irregularities shall be
cut and be made smooth and secure. The completed assembly must meet the conditions set forth in
Section 2602.5.3, and Section 710.1, when applied on a fire -resistive roof -ceiling assembly.
1-429
APPENDIX CHAPTER 15 1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
1520.3.3 Over smooth or cap -sheet surfaces. Spray -applied polyurethane foam roofing maybe
applied directly to a properly prepared smooth or cap -sheet surface. The completed assembly must l -
meet the conditions set forth in Section 2602.5.3, and Section 710.1, when applied on a fire -resis-
tive roof -ceiling assembly. -
1520.4 Construction Details.
1520.4.1 Flashings and edgings. Flashings and waterproof coverings for expansion joints shall
be compatible with the polyurethane foam system.
1520.4.2 Miscellaneous materials. Miscellaneous materials such as adhesives, elastomeric
caulking compounds, metal, vents and drains shall be a composite part of the roof system.
SECTION 1521 — OTHER ROOFINGS
Reroofing with systems not covered elsewhere in Chapter 15 or this appendix, such as, but not lim-
ited to, those that are fluid applied or applied as nonasphaltic sheets, shall be done with materials
and procedures approved by the building official.
1-430
TUSTIN CITY CODE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, ETC. 5501
"Wrecked" means that which has an outward manifestation or appearance of damage to
parts and contents which is essential to operation. (Ord. No. 1080, Sec. 2, 11-18-91)
5502 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE NUISANCES
It is hereby declared to be a public nuisance for any property owner or other person in
control of said property to keep or maintain said property, including adjacent parkways,
sidewalks or streets under fee ownership by said person, in such manner that any of the
following conditions are found to exist:
(a) Any abandoned, dismantled, wrecked, inoperable, discarded objects or equipment
such as, but not limited to automobiles, trucks, trailers, boats, appliances, water
heaters, refrigerators, furniture, fixtures, miscellaneous machinery and equipments,
cans or containers standing or stored on property or on adjacent parkway sidewalks
or streets which can be viewed from a public highway, walkway, or from private or
public property, or which items are readily accessible from such places, or which are
stored on private property in violation of any other law or ordinance;
(b) Any condition which exists upon any premises that is dangerous to human life or is
detrimental to health as determined by an appropriate city official;
(c) Any alteration of land, the topography or configuration of which in any man-made
state, whether as a result of grading operations, excavations, fill or other alteration;
interferes with the established drainage pattern over the property or from adjoining
or other property which does or may result in erosion, subsidence or surface water
drainage problems of such magnitude as to be injurious to public health, safety and
Welfare of any real property;
(d) Disposal or presence of oil, grease, other petroleum products, noxious chemicals,
pesticides, or any gaseous, liquid or solid waste in such a manner [as] to consist
[constitute] a health or fire hazard or degrade the appearance of or detract from the
aesthetic and property values of neighboring properties;
(e) Lumber (excluding stacked firewood not visible from a public street, alley or adjoining
property for use on the property or lumber for a construction project on the property
with a valid permit), junk, trash, salvage materials (including but not limited to auto
parts, scrap metals, tires, tin cans and bottles), or packing boxes or other debris stored
on premises in excess of seventy-two (72) hours;
(t) Any performance of work on motor vehicles, vehicle engines or parts, or household
fixtures, on a public right-of-way or performance of such work in yard areas of resi-
dential properties so as to be visible from a public right-of-way or neighboring prop-
erties other than emergency repairs or minor maintenance being performed by the
owner of the vehicle or fixture;
(g) Any swimming pool, pond, spa or other body of water or excavation which is aban-
doned, unattended, or unfiltered;
REV: 1-92 PS -5-5
TUSTIN CITY CODE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, ETC. 5502(h)
(h) Trailers not within established mobilehome parks, dumpsters or similar vehicles or
equipment used for sleeping purposes;
(i) Accumulations of asphalt, concrete, plaster, tile, rocks, bricks, building materials and
fill dirt resulting from excavations on or off the property;
(j) Use of a parked or stored vehicle, boat, camper shell, trailer or other similar item as
temporary or permanent living space;
(k) Any vehicle, boat, camper shell or other similar item parked or stored on an unpaved
surface or which blocks access to a required parking space;
(1) Presence of graffiti, that is, City unauthorized inscribing, spraying of paint, or making
of symbols using paint, spray paint, ink, chalk, dye, or similar materials on public or
private structures, buildings, or places.
(m) Property failing to meet minimum levels of maintenance and care as set forth as
follows: r
(1) Landscaping. All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy condition free of \-
dead, decayed, overgrown or discarded plant material;
(2) Landscape irrigation. Landscape irrigation pipes and sprinkler heads shall be
maintained in good working order so as to cover all landscaped areas;
(3) Walls, fences and other structures. All walls, fences and trash enclosures and r
other structures shall be maintained free of significant surface cracks, dryrot, (\`
warping, missing panels or blocks which either (i) threaten structural integrity,
or (ii) result in a dilapidated, decaying, disfigured, partially ruined, appearance;
(4) Parking and related surfaces. Parking surfaces and pedestrian walkways shall be
maintained in a safe condition such that any concrete, asphalt or other driving or
walking surfaces are free of potholes, buckled or cracked surfaces or raised areas;
(5) Building elevations and roofs. Exterior building surfaces and roofs shall be main-
tained free of significant surface cracks, missing materials, warping, dryrot or
blocks, which either (i) threaten structural integrity, or (ii) result in a dilapidated,
decaying, disfigured, partially ruined, appearance.
(6) Trash and debris. The property shall be maintained free of the accumulation of
trash and debris. Trash and debris associated with permitted uses are to be stored
solely in designated trash enclosures.
Any violation of subsection 5502(m)(5) is hereby declared to be a misdemeanor. (Ord.
No. 1080, Sec. 2, 11-18-91)
5503 PUBLIC NUISANCE
a Authority to Abate and Impose Sanctions
Enforcement of this chapter may be accomplished by the enforcement officer in any manner
authorized by law. The procedures set forth in this chapter shall not be exclusive and shall not
REV: 1-92 PS -5-6
RULES AND REGULATIONS § 17920.3
Pt. Ls
Library Rererences
Health and Environment a20, 32. .
C.J.S. Health and Environment §§ 2 to 6,
28 to 30, 47, 62.
§ 17920.3. Substandard building; conditions
Any building or portion thereof including any dwelling unit, guest
room or suite of rooms, or the premises on which the same is located, in
i
which there exists any of the following listed conditions to an extent that i
endangers the life, limb, health, property, safety, or welfare of the public
}
or the occupants thereof shall be deemed and hereby is declared to be a
substandard building:
(a) Inadequate sanitation shall include, but not be limited to, the
following:
(1) Lack of, or improper water closet, lavatory, or bathtub or shower j
in a dwelling unit.
(2) Lack of, or improper water closets, lavatories, and bathtubs or
showers per number of guests in a hotel.
(3) Lack of, or improper kitchen sink.
(4) Lack of hot and cold running water to plumbing fixtures in a hotel.
(5) Lack of hot and cold running water to plumbing fixtures in a
dwelling unit.
(G) Lack of adequate heating.
ti
(7) Lack of, or improper operation of required ventilating equipment. �
"
(8) Lack of minimum amounts of natural light and ventilation required j
by this code.
x;.
(9) Room and space dimensions less than required by this code.
'
(10) Lack of required electrical lighting.
(11) Dampness of habitable rooms.
(12) Infestation of insects, vermin, or rodents as determined by the
health officer. !
?I
f
(13) General dilapidation or improper maintenance.
(14) Lack of connection to required sewage disposal system.
(15) Lack of adequate garbage and rubbish storage and removal
facilities as determined by the health officer.
(b) Structural hazards shall include, but not be limited to, the follow- '
ing: j
(1) Deteriorated or inadequate foundations.
(2) Defective or deteriorated flooring or floor supports.
(3) Flooring or floor supports of insufficient size to carry imposed
loads with safety.
is
347
§ 17920.3 STATE HOUSING LAW
Div. 13
(4) Members of walls, partitions, or other vertical supports that split,
lean, list, or buckle due to defective material or deterioration.
(5) Members of walls, partitions, or other vertical supports that are of
insufficient size to carry imposed loads with safety.
(6) Members of ceilings, roofs, ceilings and roof supports, or other
horizontal members which sag, split, or buckle due to defective material
or deterioration.
(7) Members of ceiling, roofs, ceiling and roof supports, or other
fhorizontal members that are of insufficient size to carry imposed -loads
with safety.
(8) Fireplaces or chimneys which list, bulge, or settle due to defective
material or deterioration.
(9) Fireplaces or chimneys which are of insufficient size or strength to
carry imposed loads with safety.
(c) Any nuisance.
I (d) All wiring, except that which conformed with all applicable laws in
!I effect at the time of installation if it is currently in good and safe
condition and working properly.
(e) All plumbing, except that which conformed with all applicable laws
in effect at the time of installation and which has been maintained in
good condition, or which may not have conformed with all applicable
laws in effect at the time of installation but is currently in good and safe.
condition and working properly, and which is free of cross connections
and siphonage between fixtures.
(f) All mechanical equipment, including vents, except that which con-
formed with all applicable laws in effect at the time of installation and
which has been maintained in good and safe condition, or which may not
have conformed with all applicable laws in effect at the time of installa-
tion but is currently in good and safe condition and working properly.
(g) Faulty weather protection, which shall include, but not be limited
to, the following:
(1) Deteriorated, crumbling, or loose plaster.
(2) Deteriorated or ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roof,
foundations, or floors, including broken windows or doors.
(3) Defective or lack of weather protection for exterior wall coverings,
including lack of paint, or weathering due to lack of paint or other,
approved protective covering.
(4) Broken, rotted, split, or buckled exterior wall coverings or roof
coverings.
(h) Any building or portion thereof, device, apparatus, equipment,
combustible waste, or vegetation which, in the opinion of the chief of the.
fire department or his deputy, is in such a condition as to cause a fire or
explosion or provide a ready fuel to augment the spread and intensity of
fire or explosion arising from any cause.
348
RULES AND REGULATIONS § 17920.3 I
Pt. 1.5
(i) All materials of construction, except those which are specifically
allowed or approved by this code, and which have been adequately
maintained in good and safe condition.
0) Those premises on which an accumulation of weeds, vegetation,
junk, dead organic matter, debris, garbage, offal, rodent harborages,
stagnant water, combustible materials, and similar materials or condi-
tions constitute fire, health, or safety hazards.
(k) Any building or portion thereof which is determined to be an
unsafe building due to inadequate maintenance, in accordance with the
latest edition of the Uniform Building Code.
(1) All buildings or portions thereof not provided with adequate exit
facilities as required by this code, except those buildings or portions
thereof whose exit facilities conformed with all applicable laws at the
time of their construction and which have been adequately maintained
and increased in relation to any increase in occupant load, alteration or
addition, or any change in occupancy.
When an unsafe condition exists through lack of, or improper location
of, exits, additional exits may be required to be installed.
(m) All buildings or portions thereof which are not provided with the
fire -resistive construction or fire -extinguishing systems or equipment
required by this code, except those buildings or portions thereof which
conformed with all applicable laws at the time of their construction and
whose fire -resistive integrity and fire -extinguishing systems or equip-
ment have been adequately maintained and improved in relation to any
increase in occupant load, alteration or addition, or .any change in
occupancy.
(n) All buildings or portions thereof occupied for living, sleeping,
cooking, or dining purposes which were not designed or intended to be
used for such occupancies.
(o) Inadequate structural resistance to horizontal forces.
Substandard building" includes a building not in compliance with
Section 17920.7.
However, a coridition which would require displacement of sound walls
or ceilings to meet height, length, or width requirements for ceilings,
rooms, and dwelling units shall not by itself be considered sufficient
existence of dangerous conditions making a building a substandard
building, unless the building was constructed, altered, or converted in
violation of such requirements in effect at the time of constructipn,
alteration, or conversion.
(Added by Stats.1979, c. 434, p. 1553, § 2. Amended by Stats.1982, c. 1545,
Historical Note
The 1982 amendment substituted, in
subd. 0), 'rodent harboraps" for "rat har-
bomges
349
(7'
§ 1792.1.3
Library References
Health and Pnvironnienl C+32.
U.S. Health and Environment t§ 4R to
Illi, 52.
STATE HOUSING LAW
Div. 13
§ 17921.:1. Electric hot water heaters; storage capacity; timer
On or afte" Janna ry 1, 1985, all electric hot water heaters which have a
storage capacity in excess of 20 gallons and which are installed in
newly -constructed condominiums or residential homes which have not
been previously occupied shall have a timer with ;u1 off -on switch. The
timer shall be accessible and, if it is not placed on the electric hot water
heater, shall be labeled as being a switch for the hot water heater.
The provisions of this section shall be applicable only to those condo-
miniums or residential homes containing hot water heaters which exclu-
sively serve each condominium or residential home.
(Added by Stats.1982, c. 797, § 1.)
§ 17922. Administrative code rules and regulations; uniform hous-
ing code requirements;' local requirements
(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided by law, the building
standards adopted and submitted by the department for approval pursu-
ant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 18935) of Part 2.5 and the
other rules and regulations, which are contained in -Title 29 of the
California Administrative Code, adopted, amended, or repealed from lime .
to time pursuant to this chapter shall impose substantially the same
requirements as are contained in the most recent editions of the follow-
ing uniform industry codes as adopted by the organizations specified:
(1) The Uniform Housing Code of the ILrternational Conference of
Building Officials, except its definition of "substandard building."
(2) The Uniform Building Code of the International Conference of
Building Officials.
(3) The Uniform Plumbing
Code of the International Association of
Plumbing and Mechanical Officials.
(9) The Uniform Mechanical Code of the International Conference of
Building Officials and the International Association of Plumbing and
Mechanical Officials.
(5) The National Electrical Code of the National Fire Protection Asso-
ciation. In adopting building standards for approval pursuant to Chap-
ter 9 (commencing with Section 18935) of Part 2.5 for publication in the
State Building Standards Code and in promulgating other regulations,
the department shall consider local conditions and any amendments to
the uniform codes referred to in this section. Except as provided in Part
2.5 (commencing with Section 18901), in the absence of adoption by
regulation, the most recent editions of the uniform codes referred to in.
366
10.204410.302
1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE
-
Vertical clearances orwidths shall be increased when, in the opinion of the chief,
vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to provide fire apparatus access.
.. -
(b) Surface. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to
support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be provided with a surface so
'_
as to provide all-weather driving capabilities.
(c) Turning Radius. The turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be
as approved by the chief.
(d) Dead Ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in
length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire
.. =
apparatus.
l
(e) Bridges. When a bridge is required to be used as access under this section, it
shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the applicable sections of
the Building Code and shall use designed live loading sufficient to carry the
imposed loads of fire apparatus.
_
(f) Grade. The gradient for a fire apparatus access road shall not exceed the
maximum approved by the chief.
Obstruction
Sec. 10.205. The required width of a fire apparatus access road shall not be
obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. Minimum required
widths and clearances established under this section shall be maintained at all
_
times.
Marking
Sec. 10.206. When required, approved signs or other approved notices shall be
`
provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and
- =
prohibit the obstruction thereof or both.
Division III
FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS TO BUILDINGS
Premises identification
=
Sec. 10.301. (a) General. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on
all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible
- -
from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their
background.
(b) Street or Road Signs. When required by the chief, streets and roads shall be
identified with approved signs.
Key Boxes
-
Sec. 10.302. When access to or within a structure or an area is unduly difficult
because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life -
62.
1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 10.501-10.504
(c) Buildings under Construction. Fire -protection equipment and systems
shall be installed and maintained in buildings under construction in accordance
with Article 87.
71ming of Installation
Sea 10502. When fire protection, including fire apparatus access roads and
water supplies for fire protection, is required to be installed, such protection shall
be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction.
/ EXCEPTION: When alternate methods of protection, as approved by the chief,
4 am provided, the above may be modified or waived.
Approval and Testing
Sea 10503. Fre alarm systems; fire hydrant systems; fire -extinguishing sys-
tems, including automatic sprinklers and wet and dry standpipes; halon systems
and otherspecial types of automatic fire -extinguishing systems; basement pipe in-
lets; and otherfire-protection systems and appurtenances thereto shall mcetthe ap-
proval of the fire department as to installation and locationand shall be subject to
such periodic tests as required by the chief. Plans and specifications shall be sub-
mitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction.
' Condition of approval of halon systems shall be satisfactory passage of a test
conducted in accordance with nationally recognized standards prior to final
acceptance of the system.
Maintenance
Sea 10504. (a) General. Sprinkler systems, fur hydrant systems, standpipe
systems, fire alarm systems, portable fire extinguishers, smoke and heat
ventilators, smoke -removals stems and other fire -protective or extinguishing
Y P
systems or appliances shall be maintained in an operativecondition atall times and
shall be replaced or repaired where defective. Fire -protection or extinguishing
systems coverage, spacing and specifications shall be maintained in accordance
with recognized standards at all times. Such systems shall be extended, altered or
augmented as necessary to maintain and continue protection whenever any build-
ing so equipped is altered, remodeled or added to. Additions, repairs, alterations
and servicing shall be in accordance with recognized standards.
(b) Systems in High-rise Buildings. The owner of ahigh-rise building shall be
responsible for assuring that the fur- and life -safety systems required by the
Building'Code are maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless
otherwise required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted
by approved. persons. A written record shall be maintained and shall be made
available to the inspection authority. See U.B.C. Sections 1807 and 1907.
(c) Smoke -control Systems. Mechanical smoke -control systems, such as those
in high-rise buildings, buildings containing atria, covered mall buildings and
mechanical ventilation systems utilized in smokeproof enclosures and for
smoke -removal systems utilized in high -piled combustible storage occupancies,
shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise required
65
1050410.506 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE
by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved
persons. A written record shall be maintained and shall be made available to the
inspection authority.
Portable Fire Extinguishers
Sec. 10.505. (a) General. Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in
occupancies and locations as set forth in this code and as required by the chief.
Portable fire extinguishers shall be in accordance with U.F.C. Standard No.
10-1.
(b) Prohibited Types. Vaporizing liquid extinguishers containing carbon
tetrachloride orchlombromomethane shall not be installed or used in any location
for fire -protection use. .
Soda -acid, foam, loaded stream, an[ifreeze and water fire extinguishers of the
inverting types shall not be recharged or placed in service for fire -protection use.
(c) Sale of Defective Fire Extinguishers. Forms, types or kinds of fire
extinguishers which are not approved or which are not in proper working order, or
thecontentsofwhich donot meet the requirements of this code, shall not besoldor
traded.
EXCEPTION: The sale or trade of fire extinguishers to a person engaged in the
business of selling or handling such extinguishers, and the sale or exchange of
obsolete or damaged equipment forjunk.
General Provisions for Fire -extinguishing Systems
Sec 10506. (a) General. Fire -extinguishing systems shall be installed in
accordance with the Building Code. -
IFire hose threads used in connection with fire -extinguishing systems shalt be
national standard hose thread or as approved by the fire department.
The location of f redepartmenthose connections shall be approved by the chief.
B In buildings used for high -piled combustible storage, fire protection shall be in
I accordance with Article 81.
B (b) Standards. Fire -extinguishing systems shall comply with the Building
Code. See U.B.C. Standards Nos. 38-1 and 38-2.
6 B EXCEPTIONS: I. Automatic fire -extinguishing systems not coveted by the
Building Code shall be approved and installed in accordance with approved stan-
dards.
B 2 Automatic sprinkler systems may be connected to the domestic water supply
main when appmved by the chief, provided the domestic watersupply is of adequate
B pressure, capacity and sizing for the combined domestic and sprinkler requirements.
In such case, the sprinklersystem connection shall be made between the public water
I
B main or meter and the building shutoff valve, and there shall not be intervening
I valves or connections. The fur department connection may be omitted when ap-
proved by the fire department.
B 3. Automatic sprinkler systems in Group R Occupancies four stories or less may
comply with U.B.C. Standard No. 38.3. When residential sprinkler systems as set
B forth in U.B.C. Standard No. 38-3 are pmvided, exceptions to or reductions in code
requirements based on the installation of an automatic fire -extinguishing system arc
B not allowed
66
C
10.601-10.603 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE
Division VI
MAINTENANCE OF FIRE -RESISTIVE i
CONSTRUCTION, FIRE ASSEMBLIES
AND INTERIOR FINISHES
Fire -resistive Construction
Sec. 10.601. Required fire -resistive construction, including occupancy sepam-
tions, area separation walls, exterior walls due to location on property, fire -resis-
tive requirements based on type of construction, draft -stop partitions and roof `
coverings shall be maintained as specified in the Building Code and this code and
shall be properly repaired, restored or replaced when damaged, altered, breached,
penetrated, removed or improperly installed.
Fire Assemblies for Protection of Openings
Sec 10.602. (a) Maintenance. Required fireassemblies shall be maintained as
specified in the Building Code and this code. These assemblies shall bear an
approved label or other identification showing the rating thereof and shall be
properly repaired, restored or replaced when damaged, altered, breached,
penetrated, removed or improperly installed.
(b) Operation. Fire assemblies shall not be obstructed or otherwise impaired
from their proper operation at any time. \.
(c) Identification. When required by the chief, a sign shall be displayed perma-
nently near oron each required fire door in letters not less than 1 inch high to read as
follows:
FIRE DOOR
DO NOT OBSTRUCT
(d) Testing. Horizontal or vertical sliding and rolling fire doors shall be in-
spected and tested annually by the owner or the owner's authorized representative
to check for proper operation and full closure. Resetting of the release mechanism
shall be done in accordance with the manufacturer's written instructions. A written
record shall be maintained and shall be available to the inspection authority.
Interior Wall and Ceiling Finishes
Sec. 10.603. Interior wall and ceiling finishes shall be maintained in accor-
dance with the Building Code.
74
yi 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 1120411.302
(b) Location. Recreational fires shall not be conducted within 25 feet of a
/
structure or combustible material unless contained in a barbecue pit. Conditions
1 which could cause a fire to spread to within 25 feet of a structure shall be eliminated
- prior to ignition.
(c) Fre-extinguishing Equipment. Buckets, shovels or garden hoses shall be
. readily available for use at recreational fires.
(d) Attendance. Recreational fires shall be constantly attended by a person
knowledgeable in the use of fire -extinguishing equipment required by this section.
i An attendant shall supervise a recreational fire until such fire has been extin-
guished.
(e)
xtin-
guished.(e) Discontinuance. The chief is authorized to require that recreational rues
be immediately discontinued if such fires are determined by the chief to constitute
a hazardous condition. '
Commercial Barbecue Pits
Sec. U.205. (a) Indoor Locations. Barbecue pits used for commercial cooking
operations in buildings shall be constructed as commercial food heat -processing
- equipment in accordance with the Mechanical Code.
(b) Outdoor Locations. 1. Construction. Barbecue pits in outdoor locations
shall be constructed of concrete or approved noncombustible materials.
/ 2. Location. Barbecue pits outside of buildings shall not be located within 10
l • feet of combustible walls or roofs or other combustible material.
Division III
COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS.
General
Sec 11.301. Storage, accumulation, use and handling of combustible materials
shall be in accordance with this division.
Storage and Accumulation of Rubbish and Vegetation
Sec 11.302. (a) Rubbish within and Adjacent to Buildings and Structures.
Combustible rubbish kept or accumulated within or adjacent to buildings or struc-
lures shall be stored in approved containers or in rooms or vaults constructed of
noncombustible materials. Oily rags and similar materials shall be stored in metal,
metal -lined or other approved containers equipped with tightfitting covers. Com-
bustible rubbish stored in containers shall be removed from buildings not less than
once each working day.
EXCEPTION: Commercial rubbish handling operations shall be in accordance
i with Section 11.302 (c).
(b) Rubbish within Dumpsters. Dumpsters and containers with an individual
. capacity of 1.5 cubic yards (40.5 cubic feet) or more shall notbe stored in buildings
or placed within 5 feet of combustible Walls, openings or combustible roof.eave
lines.
T7
11.302-11.303 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE
EXCEPTIONS: 1. Areas containing dumpsters or containers protected by an
approved automatic sprinkler system.
2. Structures of Types I and If fire -resistive construction used for dumpster or i
container storage located not less than 10 feet from other buildings.
(c) Commercial Rubbish Handling Operations. Occupancies exclusively
performing commercial rubbish handling or recycling shall maintain rubbish or
product to be processed or recycled as follows:
1. In approved vaults,
2. In covered metal or metal -lined receptacles or bins, or
3. Completely baled and stacked in an -orderly manner in an approved location.
(d) Combustible Vegetation. Cut or uncut weeds, grass, vines and other vege-
tation shall be removed when determined by the chief to be a fire hazard. When the
chief determines that total removal of growth is impractical due to size orenviron-
mental factors, approved fuel breaks shall be established. Designated areas shall
be cleared of combustible vegetation to establish the fuel breaks.
Storage, Use and Handling of Miscellaneous Combustible
Materials
Sea 11303. (a) General. Storage, use and handling of miscellaneous combus-
tible materials shall be in accordance with this section.
(b) Storage in Buildings. 1. Ceiling clearance. Storage of combustible
materials in buildings shall be orderly and maintained not less than 2 feet from the
ceiling and not less than 18 inches below sprinkler head deflectors.
2. Exits. Combustible material shall not be stored in exits or exit enclosures.
3. Equipment rooms. Combustible material shall not be stored in boiler
rooms, mechanical rooms or electrical equipment rooms.
4. Attic, under -floor and concealed spaces. Attic, under -floor and concealed
spaces used for storage of combustible materials shall be protected on the storage
side as required for one-hour fire -resistive construction. Openings shall be pro-
tected by assemblies that are self-closing and are of noncombustible construction
or solid wood core not less than 0/4 inch in thickness. Storage shall not be placed
on exposed joists.
EXCEPTIONS: 1. Areas protected by approved automatic sprinkler systems.
2. Group iI, Division 3 and Group M Occupancies.
5. Fueled equipment Fueled equipment, including but not limited to motor-
cycles, mopeds, lawn -care equipment and portable cooking,equipment, shall not
be stored, operated or repaired within a building.
EXCEPTIONS: 1. Building or rooms constructed for such use in accordance
with the Building Code.
2. When permitted by other provisions of this code.
The chief is authorized to require removal of such equipment form any location
when the presence of such equipment is determined by the chief to be hazardous.
For requirements in covered mall buildings, see Article 35.
(c) Use of Flammable Decorative Material. 1. General. Combustible decora-
tive material, including but not limited to cotton batting, paper, foam plastics,
78
` 12.10412.106 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE
Building Code. Exits shall not be obstructed in any manner and shall remain free
of any material or matter where its presence would obstruct or render the exit
hazardous.
(b) Aisles.Aisles leading to required exits shall beprovided from all portions of
buildings. The width and spacing of aisles shall be maintained as required by
Section 25.107.
(c) Fire Escape. When fire escapes are used as an appmved exit, they shall be
maintained in accordance with this code. Fire escapes and related balconies, lad-
ders, landings and operating devices shall not be obstructed in any manner.
Emergency Escapes
B =_ Sec 12.105. Emergency escape or rescue windows or doors provided for
sleeping rooms of Group R Occupancies shall be maintained free of any
B '_ obstruction, including bars, grates or similar devices which would inhibit egress.
I = EXCEPTION: Bars,grilles, gratesorsimilardevices are allowedpmvided that
B such devices are equipped with approved release mechanisms which are openable
from the inside without the use of a key or special knowledge or effort, the release
B =_ mechanisms are maintained operable, and the building is equipped with smoke
- I detectors installed in accordance with the Building Code.
Doors
Sec 12.106. (a) General. Exit doors shall be maintained as provided in this
section. Exit doors shall be maintained in an operable condition. Doors installed
as part of required fire assemblies shall be maintained in accordance with Section
10.602.
B s- (b) Swing and Opening Force. When required by the Building Code, exitdoors
shall be of the pivoted or side -hinged swinging type. Exit doors shall swing in the
direction of exit travel when serving any hazardous area or when serving an
B =_ occupant load of 50 or more. The door latch shall release when subjected to a
15 -pound force, and the door shall be set in motion when subjected to a 30 -pound
B '_ force. The door shall swing to full -open position when subjected to a 15 -pound
force. Forces shall be applied to the latch side.
e (c) Locking Devices. Exit doors shall be operable from the inside without the
use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. Exit doors shall not be locked,
chained, bolted, barred, latched or otherwise rendered unusable. All locking
devices shall be of an approved type.
B EXCEPTIONS: 1. In Group B Occupancies, key -locking hardware may be
I - used on the main exit when the main exit consists of a single door or pair of doors
B if there is a readily visible, durable sign on, or adjacent to, the door stating THIS
I DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS. This sign shall
B be in letters not less than I inch high on a contrasting background. When unlocked,
the single door or both leaves of a pair of doors must be free to swing without
B operation of any latching device. The use of this exception may be revoked by the
I chief or building official for due cause. .
B 2. Exit doors from individual dwelling units; Group R, Division 3 congregate
I residences; and guestrooms of Group R Occupancies having an occupant load of 10
B or less may be provided with a night latch, dead bolt or security chain, provided such
86
C
1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 12.106-12.107
devices are openable from the inside without the use of a key or tool and mounted
at a height not to exceed 48 inches above the finished floor,
Manually operated edge- or surface -mounted flush bolts and surface bolts are
prohibited. When exit doors are used in pairs and approved automatic flush bolts
are used, the door leaf having the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or
surface -mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than
one operation.
EXCEPTIONS: 1. Group R, Division 3 Occupancies.
2. When a pair of doors serving a mom not nomrally occupied ate needed for the
movement of equipment, manually operated edge or surface bolts may be used and
a door closer need not be provided on the inactive leaf.
(d) Panic Hardware. Panic hardware, when installed, shall comply with the
requirements of the Building Code. The activating member shall be mounted at a
height of not less than 30 inches nor more than 44 inches above the floor. The
unlatching force shall not exceed 15 pounds when applied in the direction of exit
travel.
I
When balanced doors are used and panic hardware is required, panic hardware
shall be of the push -pad type and the pad shall not extend across more than one half
of the width of the door measured from the latch side.
(e) Special Egress -control Devices. When special egress -control devices or
/ systems are installed, such devices or systems shall be maintained in conformance
with the Building Code requirements for the original installation.
(f) Door Identification. Exit doors shall be marked so that they are readily
distinguishable from adjacent construction.
(g) Additional Doors. When required by the Building Code, additional doors
provided for egress purposes shall conform to all provisions of this article.
°i�lt7i� ='sh
r.
Gates and Barriers
Sec. 12.107. (a) General. Gates and barriers installed in exit pathways shall
meet the requirements of this section.
(b) batch. Gates and barriers shall beopenable without the use of a key or any
( special knowledge or effort Gates and barriers in an exit shall not be locked,
chained, bolted, barred, latched or otherwise rendered unopenable at times when
the building or area served by the exit is occupied.
EXCEPTION: Gates or barriers used to restrict access to various portions of a
building or area, provided the gates or barriers do not obstruct access to required
exits from occupied spaces and any dead ends created by the installation of such
devices do not exceed 20 feet in length.
(c) Width. Gates and barriers installed across anexitshallbeofsufficientsizeas
to be capable of opening so that the clear width of the opening is not less than the
exit width required by the Building Code.
(d) Swing. Gates and barriers installed across an exit shall swing in the direction
of exit travel when required by the Building Code for exit doors.
87
1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 85.101.85.106
ARTICLE 85
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND WIRING
Scope
Sec. 85.101. Permanent and temporary use of electrical appliances, fixtures,
motors and wiring shall be in accordance with this article.
EXCEPTION: I.ow-voltage wiring, such as communications and signal wir-
ing.
This article shall be enforced in cooperation with the authority havingjurisdic-
tion for the enforcement of the Electrical Code.
Definitions
Sea 85.102. For definitions of APPLIANCE, PORTABLE; APPLIANCE,
STATIONARY; EXTENSION CORD; FLEXIBLE CORD; MULTIPLUG
ADAPTER; PANEL BOARD, ELECTRICAL; PERMANENT WIRING; POW-
ER TAP; RECEPTACLE; SWITCHBOARD, ELECTRICAL; and TEMPO-
RARY WIRING, see Article 9.
Use of Temporary Wiring
Sec. 85.103. (a) During Construction. Temporary wiring for electrical power
r' and lighting installations is allowed during periods of construction, remodeling,
\. repair or demolition of buildings, structures, equipment or similar activities.
(b) During Special Events and Holidays. Temporary wiring for electrical
power and lighting installations is allowed for a period not to exceed 90 days for
Christmas decorative lighting, carnivals and similar purposes, and for experi-
mental or developmental work.
(c) Attachment to Structures. When temporary wiring is attached to a struc-
ture, it shall be attached in an approved manner.
Abatement of Electrical Hazards
Sec. 85.104. When electrical hazards are identified, measures to abate such
conditions shall be taken. Identified hazardous electrical conditions in permanent
wiring or temporary wiring shall be corrected in cooperation with the authority
enforcing the Electrical Code.
Electrical wiring, devices, appliances and other equipment which are modified
or damaged and constitute an electrical shock or fire hazard shall not be used.
Electrical Motors
Sec. 85.105. Electrical motors shall be maintained in a manner free from
accumulations of oil, dirt, waste and other debris which will interfere with re-
quired motor ventilation or create a fire hazard.
Extension Cords
Sec. 85.106. (a) General. Extension cords shall not be used as a substitute for
permanent wiring.
431
'. ri:.'....i {..tiL ... ...�. �'1n✓�aV- i u.-.:':- 4 4G'L1i�:Ya•/%.!I✓':I4.M.: .i�..I r.R4rV•ii.�w�i�� yi-..
1101-1101.3 - 1994 UNIFORM HOUSING CODE
Chapter 11
NOTICES AND ORDERS OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL
SECTION 1101 — GENERAL
1.101.1 Commencement of Proceedings. When the building official has inspected or caused to
be inspected building and has found and determined that such building is a substandard building,
the building official shall commence proceedings to cause the repair, rehabilitation, vacation orde-
molition of the building.
1101.2 Notice and Order. The building official shall issue a notice and order directed to the re-
cord owner of the building. The notice and order shall contain: ' '
I. The street address and a legal description sufficient for identification of the premises upon
which the building is located.
2. A statement that the building official has found the building to be substandard with a brief and
concise description of the conditions found to render the building dangerous under the provisions of
Section 202 of this code.
3. A statement of the action required to be taken as determined by the building official.
3.1 If the building official has determined that the building or structure must be repaired, the
order shall require that all required permits be secured therefor and the work physically
commenced within such time (not to exceed 60 days from the date of the order) and com-
pleted within such time as the building official shall determine is reasonable under all of
the circumstances.
3.2 If the building official has determined that the building or structure must be vacated, the
order shall require that the building or structure shall be vacated within a certain time from
the date of the order as determined by the building official to be reasonable.
3.3 If the building official has determined that the building or structure must be demolished,
the order shall require that the building be vacated within such time as the building official
shall determine reasonable (not to exceed 60 days from the date of the order), that all re-
quired permits be secured therefor within 60 days from the date of the order and that the
demolition be completed within such time as the building official shall determine is rea-
sonable.
4. Statements advising that if any required repair ordemolition'work (without vacation also be-
ing required) is not commenced within the time specified, the building official (i) will order the
building vacated and posted to prevent further occupancy until the work is completed, and (ii) may
proceed to cause the work to be done and charge the costs thereof against the property or its owner.
5. Statements advising (i) that any person having any record title or legal interest in the building
may appeal from the notice and order or any action of the building official to the housing advisory
and appeals board, provided the appeal is made in writing as provided in this code, and filed with the
building official within 30 days from the date of service of such notice and order, and (ii) that failure
to appeal will constitute a waiver of all right to an administrative hearing and determination of the
matter.
1101.3 Service of Notice and Order. The notice and order, and any amended or supplemental
notice and order, shall be served upon the record owner, and posted on the property; and one copy
thereof shall be served on each of the following if known to the building official or disclosed from
official public records: the holder of any mortgage or deed of trust or other lien or encumbrance of
record; the owner or holder of any lease of record; and the holder of any other estate or legal interest,
of record in or to the building or the land on which it is located. The failure of the building official to
serve any person required herein to be served shall not invalidate any proceedings hereunder as to
16
BOARD OF APPEALS REPORT
ATTACHMENT "E"
a
Community Redevelopment Agency
February 27, 1996
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
(714) 573-3106
Mr.VinayLtd. Paz FAX (714) 573-3113
PaLLt
3745 W. Chapman 9205
Orange, Ca 92668
Subject: Residential Rehabilitation Program, McFadden Village Apartments, 17271-17289 McFadden
Ave, Tustin.
Dear Mr. Pai:
You called my office yesterday, February 26, 1996, to determine the status of your rehabilitation grant/loan
application. The purpose of this letter is to apprise you of the status of the application and to advise you as to the
next steps in the process. You have submitted sufficient information from the subject property's tenants to allow
you to proceed in the rehabilitation program and your application for rehabilitation grant and loans funds has
been accepted. The grants and deferred loan that are available to a program participant are a $3000 general
rehabilitation grant, a $3000 exterior paint grant and up to a $25,000 deferred loan.
The next step for a program participant would be to solicit bids for the rehabilitation work, submit the bids for
review, and then execute a participation agreement to provide reimbursement to the participant for the cost of
the rehabilitation work in accordance with the rehabilitation program. You previously submitted bids for the
rehabilitation work that was identified as being needed at the property. However, because of the numerous code
violations present at the property the scope of rehabilitation work has expanded considerably.
It is my understanding that you Will be attending a meeting with City staff on Thursday February 29, 1996 at
2:00 p.m ,at City Hall to discuss the code violations and the timetable for their correction. At that meeting we
can discuss the specifics of how the grant and loan funds will be released in regards to the completion of the
corrective work.
Sincerely,
zw XK&U&
David Gottlieb
Redevelopment Project Manager
cc: Rick Brown
Mark Galvan
R
a
Community Redevelopment Agency
City of Tustin
March 25, 1996 300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
(714)573-3106
Mr. Vmay Pai FAX (714) 573-3113
Pai-25 Ltd.
3745 W. Chapman 9205
Orange, Ca 92668
Subject: Residential Rehabilitation Program, McFadden Village Apartments, 17271-17289 McFadden
Ave, Tustin..
Dear Mr. Pai:
You have inquired as to the status of your Rehabilitation Program grant and loan applicaiton for the subject
vroperty. The status today is the same as when I wrote you most recent letter of February 27, 1996 (copy
attached). I am still waiting for you to submit at least three estimates for all the work contained in the Notice and
Order issued by the Building Official on January 24, 1996. In regards to how the rehabilitation funds would be
released the following are two alternatives for you to consider.
Alternative 41.
The Rehabilitation Program procedures that have been adopted by the City Council requires an "Applicant
whose work exceeds maximum loan or grant provides City with payment of remaining portion of total
rehabilitation costs." Based upon the severity and large number of code violations present at the subject
property it is assumed that the cost for all the corrective work will be in excess of the grants and loans available
through the Rehabilitation Program Therefore, once you have obtained at least three bids for all the required
work and the full cost is determined you would be required to deposit with the City into a trust account the
difference between the rehabilitation costs and the grants and loans that are available. No more than three
progress payments would then be made from the trust account and the City's rehabilitation fund to pay the
contractor.
Alternative 92
So that you will not have to deposit with the City the entire amount of the corrective work for the property as
discussed in Alternative 91, and as a consideration to you, there is a second alternative available to you. The
Loan Committee has indicated that they would approve the use of rehabilitation funds without you having to
eposit your share of the rehabilitation costs with the City. In this alternative rehabilitation funds would be
disbursed after you have completed the majority of the corrective work As an example, if the bids reveal that
the cost per building to do the corrective work is $35,000, then rehabilitation funds would be used to fund the
f
Mr. Vinay Pai
March 25, 1996
payment schedule
work for the last building to be done. Since there are 10 apartment buildings on the property, you would pay for
the corrective fork on the first nine buildings and the rehabilitation funds would be used for the last (the tenth)
building. In addition, rehabilitation funds would only be disbursed for the tenth building if all the work had been
completed, inspected and approved for the first nine buildings.
I believe that this satisfies your inquiry as to how the rehabilitation funds will be disbursed. Participant
agreements for your signature may be prepared once you have obtained bids for the corrective work and staff
has had a chance to review the bids costs analyzed. You also need to let me know which alternative you select as
the method of payment for the rehabilitation work.
Please be advised that your ability to receive and use rehabilitation funds for the subject property in no way
abrogates your responsibility to comply with the Notice and Order issued to you by the Tustin Building Official.
Sincerely,
T6ue v U vda
David Gottlieb
Redevelopment Project Manager
cc: C. Shingleton
R Zimmer
L.7effrey
R. Brown
E. Binsack
!i
9VESTMENTS, RVC
MSONAL
• 3745 W. Chapman, Suite 205
f^
• Orange. CA 92668
VINAY PAI - PRESIDENT
• (714) 937-0505
)rn in Bombay, India in 1947. Moved to the USA in 1971 as a masters
:udent in Electronic Engineering. Founder and President of PAI
7VESTMENTS, INC. since 1980.
)UCATIONAL
Lsters degree in Computer Design from Texas A&I University
ichelor of Science degree in Electronic Engineering from Bombay
iiversity
ir-. fied Financial Planner certificate from University of Southern
ilifornia
)al Estate Licensee since 1978
:neral Contractors licensee since 1987
:PERIENCE
)76-79 Worked as computer design engineer for Computer Automation,
.rox and Citibank developing micro processor software.
180 -Present President of both PAI INVESTMENTS, INC. AND PAI DEVELOPMENT CO.
As President of PAI INVESTMENTS, INC., heads the company
to do Real Estate Syndication.and property managment.
)93
50 39Vd
As President of PAI DEVELOPMENT CO., acts as general
contractor for land development projects.
Acted as court appointed receiver in case #VC010411.
THJ rr,.r,rrrr. ..•�.. .-��r ... -. ....
PROPERTIES MANAGED BY PAI INVESTMENTS, INC.
---------------------------------------------
)RESS
_-_-
UNITS
LENGTH OF MANAGEMENT
!7 Monticeto Rd.
-----
--------------------
lona, CA
90
6
years
!71 McFadden
;tin, CA
73
6
years
31 Central Ave.
-den Grove, CA
52
4
years
550 Bolsa Ave.
-den Grove, CA
36
3
years
212 Gould Street
rerside, CA
36
5
years
35 N. Central Ave.
3hland, CA
92
4
years
E. Walnut
ita Ana, CA
79
2
years
)2 N. Ross
ita Ana, CA
105
1
year
L E. 16th
ita Ana, CA
60
2
years
afort Inn
152
1
year
i.ton, CA
160 Joy St.
63
1
year
ce Elsinore, CA
W. Broadway
162
1
year
theim, CA
MANAGEMENT
C INVESTMENTS, INC. currently owns and manages over 900 apartment units
Orange, San Diego and Riverside Counties. The property management system
completely computerized. Each property has its own savings and checking
:aunts. All rents are directly deposited into the account and all the
?ense checks are written on this account. There are not any cash
insactions. Monthly statements are mailed consisting of copies of the
ik statements with clear explanation of each check.
L the receipts and the books are preserved by us and they
a available for inspection by the partners at mutually convenient
xrs.
ca 7nHJ
MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS DEVELOPED BY PAI INVESTMENTS, INC.
-------------------------------------------------------
L0 39Vd ICd 964TLE64TL TT:hA SFFT/AZ//A
TOTAL
DDRESS
UNITS
COST
COMPLETION DATE
O1 S. Birch, SA
20
$ 850,000
12/85
09 S. Birch, SA
20
875,000
12/86
10 Chestnut, SA
45
2,200,000
08/86
22 Walnut, SA
60
3,925,000
08/87
13 Pine, SA
20
910,000
12/86
529 W. Civic Ctr, SA
13
820,000
03/88
505 W. 5th, SA
38
2,300,000
03/88
502 N. Ross, SA
105
5,880,000
01/88
21 E. 16th, SA
60
3,360,000
11/87
3: Iowa, Colton
152
5,450,000
10/89
306 Alder, Fontana
60
2,650,000
03/89
3882 Elliot, G.G.
32
4,150,000
07/90
406 W. 6th, Corona
45,000
3,500,000
11/90
3HOPPING CENTER)
sq. ft.
19 La Palma, Anaheim
12
1,050,000
07/90
)0 W. Vermont, Anaheim
14
1,265,000
04/90
1640 Euclid, G.G.
22
2,640,000
07/90
5460 Joy Street, Lake
63
4,150,000
07/91
Lsinore
L0 39Vd ICd 964TLE64TL TT:hA SFFT/AZ//A
OPERATING STATEMENT
/
1-25. LTD. MCFADDEN VILLA
1` DECEMBER 28. i994
CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATt
INCOME:
RENTAL INCOME
3:3, 595. i4
97.6'-1 t
443.059.15
97.0;
SECURITY DEPOSITS
500.00
1.4%
7.153.00
1.6:
CREDIT CHECK
60.00
0.2114
510.00
0.17
LAUNDRY INCOME
319. 50
0.9%
4,534.28
1.0-,
REBATES
0.00
0:0%
67.75
0.07
OTHER
0. 00
0.0%
1, 364. 00
0. 3;
TOTAL INCOME COLLECTED
-------------
36,4-71.64
-----------------
100.0%
456,726-18
-----
100.0-,
EXPENSES:
'ADVERTISING
537.97
1.5X
4,675.53
1. 17
MAINTENANCE
4'.535-58
12. 4%
23, 476. 60
5.11
MANAGEMENT FEES
1,453.20
4. OY
18, 796.52
4. 1:
RESIDENT MANAGERS ALLOW.
0.00
0.0%
4.800:00
1. 1;
PHONE
32. 76
0. 1""
36.4. 66
0. 17
CREDIT CHECK
242.53
0.7%
564.08
0.1;
OFFICE SUPPLIES
0.00
0.Ov.
335.00
0.17
LICENSES AND TAXES
0. Q10
0. 0'f•
2. 02.4. 00
0. 4;
LEGAL AND PROFESSIONAL
0.00
141.0;
i3,436.12
GAR<DENING
0.00
0.0%
150.00
0
NATURAL CTAS
0.00
0. 0;?
9.439.00
2.,
WATER
2.534.94
7. 0V..
12, 198.08
2. 7:
ELECTRICITY
574.83
1.6'/.
10.483.34
2.37
RUBBISH COLLECTION
1,034.45
2.8%
10._ 540. 10
2.3-1
PEST CONTROL
0.00
0. 0;?
793.00
0.27
INSURANCE
5G8.17
1.6%
7,486.13
1.67
COMPENSATION
'i. 650. 00
4.5%
i0, 566. 50
2. 37
SUPPLIES
2. 065. 53
5. 7:
12, 434. 23
2. 7;
SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUNDS
0.00
0.0%
1.620.00
0.47
BANK. CHARGES
0.00
0.07
460.30
0.1'
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
qET OPERATING INCOME
LOAN PAYMENT
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE
CASH FLOW
15. 230.01
41.8%
144, 903. 19
31.7;
21, 241. 63
58.2%
311, 824.99
68.37.
27. 021.59
74.1%
306, 354.55
67. 17
27, 021. 59 74. 1','-
------------- -----
( 5.779.96) 15.
306,354.55- 67.17.
5,470.44 1.2-,
BOARD OF APPEALS REPORT
ATTACHMENT "F"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 96-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, UPHOLDING THE DECISIONS OF THE
BUILDING OFFICIAL CONTAINED IN THE NOTICE AND
ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 22, 1996, REQUIRING THE
REPAIR AND REHABILITATION OF BUILDINGS AND
GROUNDS LOCATED AT 17271-17289 MCFADDEN AVENUE
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
The Board of Appeals of the City of Tustin does hereby
resolve as follows:
I. The Board of Appeals hereby finds and determines as
follows:
A. That during February, 1996, the Building
Official inspected the buildings and grounds
located at 17271-17289 McFadden Avenue.
B. That on February 22, 1996 the Building
Official issued a proper Notice and Order to
the property owner via certified mail
describing those conditions which violate City
and/or State laws and established reasonable
time periods for correction of those
violations.
C. That on March 20, 1996, an appeal was filed by
the owner with the Building official
contesting the required actions contained in
the Notice and Order dated February 22, 1996.
D. That pursuant to such appeal, a public hearing
before the Board of Appeals was duly noticed
for 6:00 p:m. on April 8, 1996.
E. That witnesses were properly sworn and oral
and documentary evidence was duly presented to
the Board of Appeals on April 8, 1996.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Board of Appeals
Resolution No. 96-1
Page 2
II. The Board of Appeals hereby further finds and
resolves as follows:
A. That there is substantial evidence that each
of the violations identified in the February
22, 1996 Notice and Order exists.
B. That the violations identified in the Notice
and Order demonstrate that substandard housing
and property maintenance conditions exist.
C. That the extent of repairs ordered by the
Building Official are appropriate for the
property.
- D. That the time limitations for starting and
completing the repairs are reasonable.
III. Based upon the above findings, and upon the oral
and documentary evidence submitted at its April 8,
1996 hearing, the Board of Appeals hereby upholds
the decision of the Building Official as set forth
in the February 22, 1996 Notice and Order of the
Building Official subject to the following
conditions:
A. The property owner is hereby ordered to comply
with the requirements of the Notice and Order
identified in Attachment A of the related
staff report dated April 8, 1996, as attached
hereto and incorporated herein.
B. The Building Official is directed to provide a
copy of this Resolution to the property owner.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Board of Appeals
Resolution No. 96-1
Page 3
C. In the event of non-compliance with the Notice
and Order by the property owner, the Board of
Appeals has requested that the City Attorney
pursue appropriate civil and/or criminal
remedies to force compliance with this Notice
and order.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Tustin
Board of Appeals, held on the 8th day of April, 1996.
MARJORIE KASALEK
Chairwoman
Barbara Reyes
Recording Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, BARBARA REYES, the undersigned, hereby certify that I
am the Recording Secretary of the Board of Appeals of the
City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 96-1 was
duly passed and adopted at a special meeting of the
Tustin Board of Appeals, held on the 8th day of April,
1996.
BARBARA REYES
Recording Secretary
BOARD OF APPEALS REPORT
ATTACHMENT "G"
Visual exhibits consisting of still photographs and videotape
of the McFadden Village Apartments will be introduced as evidence
during the Board of Appeals hearing on April 8, 1996.
A C T I O N A G E N D A
CITY OF TUSTIN
BOARD OF APPEALS
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 22, 1996
CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
ROLL CALL:
Board Members
Present: Board Member Marjorie Rasalek, Chairwoman
Board Member Lou Bone, Vice Chairman
Board Member Nanette Lunn
Board Member David Vandaveer
Absent: Board Member Howard Mitzman
Staff
Present: Elizabeth Binsack, Community Development Director
Mark Galvan, Code Enforcement Officer
Dave Gottlieb, Redevelopment Program Manager
Lois Jeffrey, City Attorney
Soroush Rahbari, Acting Building Official
Barbara Reyes, Recording Secretary
George Wiesinger, Code Enforcement Officer
Other Agencies
Present: Mike Goldsberry, Orange County Environmental Health
specialist
David Montgomery, Orange County Fire Safety Specialist
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not
on the agenda.)
At this time members of the public may address
the Commission regarding any items not on the
agenda and within the subject matter
jurisdiction of the Commission (NO action can
be taken off -agenda items unless authorized by
law).
No One Addressed the Board
CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE
CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE
MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION
OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING
ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE
COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
Board of Appeals Action Agenda
April 22, 1996
Page 2
1. Minutes of the April 8 1996 Board of Appeals Meeting
Commissioner Bone requested a correction to page 6 of the minutes
to reflect that his comments concerning trash on balconies include
all three of the properties he mentioned, not just at the Walnut
address.
as corrected.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
ADJOURNMENT:
approve the minutes
The meeting adjourned to the regular meeting of the Planning
Commission at 7:03 p.m.
The next meeting of the Board of Appeals will be set as items are
scheduled for appeal.
INVESTMENTS, INC.
Ccs
• 3745 W. Chapman, Suite 205
�e m 5' �«s``Gk )
• Orange, CA 92668 • (714) 937-0505
RECy'IVED
ppR 0 4 1996
COMMUNITY DEVELOPME%l
BY
DATE: APRIL 4, 1996
TO: BOARD OF APPEALS
FROM: VINAY PAI
SUBJECT: MCFADDEN VILLAGE APARTMENTS
(17271-17289 MCFADDEN AVENUE)
RECEIVED
APR 0 4 1996
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BY
Honorable Persons:
I have been owning McFadden Village Apartments since 1/1/86. For
the past several years, my ownership did not create any problem to
the city. As far as I know the city was satisfied with the
operation of the property. I will chronologically explain the
events that led to today's hearing. On 11/30/94 I received a
Notice of Violation from Community Conservation Officer Mr.
Clifford Cox. I met with Mr. Cox and when I explained to him that
because of recession the income on the property had gone down and
I was short on funds. He told me that the city had a loan and grant
program and if I get certain items done to show good faith, the
city will wait on other items till the loan is funded, provided, a
timely application is made. I immediately spent $21,500 to work on
the following items : We cut the overgrown trees, patched all the
asphalt coating on the drive way, repaired pool heater and repaired
roof on some buildings. Also I made a loan grant application on
12/2/94. Both Mr. Cox and Mr. Gotlieb assured me that the complex
certainly looked better and I am in compliance with the loan
request. Hence the city will withhold further action till the loan
is funded.
In the month of April, Mr. Gotlieb asked me to submit bids on work
to be completed and I promptly complied with the request. As city
officials gave me the impression that funds will be released soon.
I even hired a construction supervisor, Mr. Michael Corona to do
the work. From April to July I provided city further information
needed to fund the loan. In a letter dated 8/9/95 city official
said that I can start work soon. Between August & December Mr.
Gotlieb informed me that he was working on increasing paint grant
for the apartment project.
On 1/24/96 I received a letter ordering me to set time to inspect
apartments from inside. As usual I complied and arranged
immediately to the inspection of the interior of the units. This
led to the Notice of Order dated 2/22/96. This order has been
substantially complied with except for a few items requiring major
infusion of capital.
Board of Appeals
McFadden Village Apartments
April 4, 1996
Page 2
Items complied are as follows:
1. All the smoke detectors identified are in working order.
2. All heating units identified in Appendix A are in working
order. Most of them were working on the day of the first
inspection but the inspector could not figure out how to
operate them and added them to the list anyway.
3. Units 17271 #L and #H were brought to code and were
declared satisfactory by city inspector.
6. All the remaining substandard conditions identified in
attachment "A" were completed except for the ones not
marked. As you can see there is substantial compliance
on this item.
In items 6 & 7 most of the units violations were (1) infested with
cockroaches (2) inadequate ventilation. I have got pest control
service on these units since 1986. Even though now we satisfied
both inspectors I still fail to understand how can I be liable if
some of the inhabitants are filthy which lead to the problem of
cockroach infestation. Even though we had time till 6/1/96 for
compliance of items in attachment "A" most of them are complied
with.
4. We have started work on guard-rails, hand -rails. This
item was originally to be finished using the funds
granted by the city. If the city releases the funds they
promised in a letter dated 8/9/95 (copy attached) we will
finish them in time.
5. Reroofing of all the roofs is the most expensive items.
To reroof all the roofs the costs are approximately
$80,000. My roofer Mr. Les Landes who is in business
for several years has gone up with me and came to the
conclusion that some of the roofs can be reroofed next
year as they had been redone in the past 2 years and they
do not leak. Mr. Landes will personally give testimony
regarding the.condition of the roof, at the hearing.
In conclusion we have substantially complied with the order. Even
though the staff report suggests that we did not meet March 4th
deadline, that is in error as we had inspection done by the Fire
Authority and Health Officer and they simply did not relay the
results to Community Preservation. I have personally called them
leaving messages on 3 occasions but my calls were never returned.
Even though my resident manager Mr. Art Porter asked them to sign
off the completed work they told him that is not the department
custom.
Board of Appeals
McFadden Village Apartments
April 4, 1996
Page 3
My roofer does not see it necessary to repair all the roofs now.
We are replacing roofs on 3 buildings. Even if I decide to appease
the city, I do not have funds to complete all the work now. As the
roofs in question are not leaking, I request you to give me
additional time to finish remaining roofs. As every property in
Tustin does not have a new roof I think it is discriminatory to
make my property to have a new roof when it is not even leaking.
Mr. Gotlieb from City informed me that $32,000 of the
redevelopment funds are available but they will come as last
dollars. As I have complied substantially except for railings and
the roof, I request the city to make these funds available to
correct the railings. This was the main item of the original
notice dated 11/30/94 where city officials assured me that they
will wait for compliance till city funds are made available. I
relied to my detriment on those assurances and spent $21,500 to
improve the property. The fact that city did not take any action
from 11/30/94 to 2/22/96 supports my position. I have been asked
to come up $100,000 to do the reroofing in 60 days time in these
recessionary times, This is an extreme burden to me. Please help
me.
As a record only . The owners of the property are 2 limited
partnership named PAI -25, LTD. and PAI -16, LTD. I am the general
partner of the 2 partnerships. PAI Investments Inc. has nothing to
do with this project even though Notice and Order dated 2/22/96 was
given to PAI Investments Inc.
Even though city described the project as hazardous I have never
made a single insurance claim on the project in my 10 years of
ownership. The insurance company inspects the project every year
and had come up with minor corrections which were complied with.
Attachments :
1. Items complied with and inspected and approved in Appendix A.
2. Letter from Mr. Gotlieb dated 8/9/95.
ATTACHMENT A
'MMON AREA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE VIOLATIONS:
Code Violations
GARAGES -
TCC 5502
Exterior surfaces: All garage structures exhibit signs of broken
F; -and stucco -and stud=' Garage #53 and #54 has severe structural
damage to studs.£
Roof: All garage structures exhibit signs of severe roof damage.
Laundry Room at Garage Structure #1-12 : X�Zenair dama ed drywall
including holes in walls, deteriorated w'ndow sill r ndows
"missing screens,) damaged my c6)-6 Xall electrical fixtures
missing covers.
LANDSCAPING: General lack of maintenance including ivy growing
uncontrolled onto exterior of buildings causing damage to stucco; bare
areas where paths have been worn through planter areas; trees need
trimming and stumps removed; roots causing extensive damage to
pedestrian walkways -throughout the complex; landscaping debris allowed
to accumulate on ground. Some planter areas are completely devoid of
landscaping including the strip adjacent to ,t he driveway along the west
area.
property 1__^.e and all of the planter areas in the north parking lot
iThe property owner shall submit a landscaping plan for review by the
Community .Development Department illustrating how the existing
deficiencies will be remedied.
IRRIGATION: General lack of maintenance including inoperable automatic
timers, broken lines, missing sprinkler, improperly installed risers and
sprinkler heads, leaking valves.
The irrigation system shall be repaired. to provide automatic and
adequate coverage of all landscaping areas.
TRASH ENCLOSURES: View -obscuring doors at all trash enclosures are
missing.
PARKING AND CIRCULATION/PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS: Asphalt parking surfaces
and concrete swales are cracked, buckled*and severely damaged.
FIRE DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS Code Violation
All Fire Lanes shall be restriped and stenciled. UFC 10.504(a)
All damage or faded Fire Lane signage shall be
replaced. UFC 10.504(a)
:ace
_a11 me ssin a artmentletterin
P __ - g.wher_1'0;.301.(a).
1�P`}ar6dry,warsrr laundry_room across groin build"ang`*
at 57273 UFC 10.603
[FcFad':;,er. '✓'_' �a.� �Gart:,ents =
Pace 2
R - move combustibles from garage roof incl-.d-inc
c, d trees, rash and debris. UFC 11.302(a)
Remove illegal lighting stapled -to stairway at
building at 17281.UFC 85.104
ADDRESS: 17271 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions: - Code Violation
Exterior surface: stucco damage. HSC 17920.3(8)
Roof: water damage; leaks. HSC 17920.3(g)
Deck/Patio: resurface, broken sheathing. HSC 17920.3(8)
Stairs/landings: treads and guardrails rotted
and broken, stairs at unit F and H, railing
at J and L. HSC 17920.3(g)
Wall, Fences: water damage, broken. TCC 5502(m)(3)
Driveways, walkways: cracked, raised, uneven. TCC 5502(m)(4)
Landscaping: not maintained, not properly
sloped to drain. TCC 5502(m)(1)
Irrigation: broken pipes and heads, leaks. TCC 5502(m)(2)
Rain Gutter/Roof Drain: blocked and broken,
no drain covers. HSC 17920.3(g)
Water Heater: enclosure damaged walls. HSC 17920.3(e)
Interior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Unit
A:
X No hea€.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Unit
B:
'
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Unit
D:
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
�Smo e�detector� miss ngaorxLnoperable.`'
UFC
10.504 (a)
Unit
E:
oor,-. amp` s
HSC
17920.3 (a)
(13)
'heaE"`
HSC
17920.3 (a)
(6)
des
HSC
17920.3(a)(12)
r_Smoke.,=.detector mission=or inoperable:
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit
F:,�.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
/- _:___- - -- -- _----"_-.
HSC
17920.3(a)
(12)
Unit
G:
<Sho,ufer'pa11'?cracked:"'
HSC
17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
Fei=uary 22 1::3 ' -
?aCP- 3
Unit H:
Unit I:
Unit J:
Unit R:
_ Qnfgz _ion of roaches.
-- -
7 "PO
-_ EON
-
missing'Smoke detector
or inoperable
ADDRESS: 17273 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions:
Exterior surface: stucco damage with mold.
Roof: water damage, leaks, fascia boards
are damaged.
B£ iN-r. ;: ^moieei�s• Ssi- g ssme
Wall, Fences: broken fence, water damage.
Driveways, walkways: broken walkway with
2" differential.
Landscaping: not maintained.
Irrigation: water leaks, broken heads, exposed.
Rain Gutter/Roof Drain: blocked or broken.
Water Heater: wall damage and electrical
damage at enclosure; no seismic bracing.
I'
Interior Substandard Conditions:
Unit A:p-� ���:;-r�mav�e�eattsE-of
f lir-ramgness
HSC 17920(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920 (3) (e)
ASC 17920.3(a)(11)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
ASC 17920.3(b)(6)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
UFC 10.504(a)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
TCC 5502 (m) (3)
TCC 5502(m)(4)-
TCC
502(m)(4)-
TCC 5502 (m) (1)
TCC 5502 (m) (2)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(e)
Code Violation
-HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Jtirl.l r' .. • �_�i
Pace 4
Unit B: X
Unit C::z-re_—
CS
Unit D:
Water closet" runs 6-ontj
ADDRESS: 17275 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions:
Exterior surface: stucco damage.
Roof: water damage, broken sheathing and rafters
Walls, fences: me_sture damage.
Driveways, walkways: broken sidewalks and
pool decking.
Landscaping: Not maintained, inadequate slope
to drain.
Irrigation: leaks, and broken pipes. .
Junk and debris: in pool area and bathrooms.
Rain Gutter/roof drains: blocked and no
drain cover.
Interior Substandard Conditions:
Recreation toilets not functional.
Ceiling and roof structure damaged
Replace dire extingii%sfie5'
Repair panic hardware at egress.
HSC 179.20.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(7)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(a)(7)
HSC 17920.3(e)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
TCC 5502(m)(3)
TCC 5502 (m) (4)
TCC 5502(m)(1)
TCC 5502 (m) (2)
TCC 5502(e)
HSC 17920.3(e)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(e)
UFC 10.603
UFC 10.505(a)
UFC 12.106(d)
Women's restroom must be re -converted back to original use.
ADDRESS: 17277 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions:
Exterior surface: stucco damage.
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(8)
2
Pace 5
Roo water Camage._leaks, blistering. HSC 17920.3(g)
Deck/Patio: stringers, ra-iling, and treads
broken. HSC 17920.3(8)
Drs/windows/screens: missing some window screens. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Stairs/landings: all stairs rotted, termite
damaged and broken. HSC 17920.3(8)
Walls, fences: water damaged and termite damaged.
Also missing boards. TCC 5502(m)(3)
Driveway, walkways: broken, raised and uneven
Landscaping: unmaintained condition.
Irrigation: exposed pipes, broken heads and
leaks.
Rain gutters/ roof drains: blocked, ,missing
drain covered.
1...:erior Substandard Conditions:
Unit A: 'x Unit has extension cord extended
across`sidewalk;
,< No heat.
Unit B: Kitchen sink leaks.
,\Inadequate bathroom ventilation.
No heat.
Tnf==ta__ee-ef re --e es.
Unit C: Ceiling water stained.
r Smoke -detector missing or inoperable.
Unit D: Plumbing wall at corridor damaged.
Hole in hallway wall.
Unit E: Roof leaks and deteriorated ceiling
at bedroom and hallway.
Dampness of inhabitableroom.
�< Smoke detector missing_ or-:inoperabhe'.
Unit F: Under sink damaged from lavatory leak
No heat.
Unit G: Lavatory faucet leaks.
Ceiling mildew in bath.
Inadequate ventilation.
>c No_hea_t,
x Smoke detector-mise�ing or inoperable.
TCC 5502 (m) (4)
TCC 5502 (m) (1)
TCC 5502 (m) (2)
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(e)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(d)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(7)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
HSC 17920.3(x)(12)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(11)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
HSC 17920.3(x)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(7)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
UFC 10.504(a)
Mcbc-4d .n V-4 i ace A_Cartmen CS
Fe6ruari 22, 13-5
Page 5
A.oDRESS: 17279 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions:
Exterior surface: stucco damage with mold.
Roof: water standing, damaged, leaks.
Deck/Patio: surface damage.
Drs/windows/Screens: door screen missing on
some units.
Stairs, Landings: broken and termite damaged
Wall, Fences: water damage, termite damage.
Driveways, walkways: broken, raised, uneven.
Landscaping: not maintained.
Irrigation: broken heads, leaks.
Rain Gutter/Roof Drain: blocked,'missinc drain
cover, broken downspout.
XElectric Panel: "o- �='M—Mr_. �e
Water Heater: wall damage inside enclosure
Interior Substandard Conditions:
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(8)
TCC 5502 (m) (3)
TCC 5502(m)(4)
TCC 5502(m)(1)
TCC 5502 (m) (2)
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(e)
Code Violation
Unit B: Kitchen sink leaks.
HSC
17920.3(e)
aa3 suing:-roomdamage>
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Inadequate ventilation.
HSC
17920.3(a)(7)
Unit C: Kitchen sink leak damage underside.
HSC
17920.3(x)(13)
Kitchen cabinets falling off.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Unit E: X=Kitchen. sink =leaks?
HSC
17920.3(e)
-
Ceiling in bath is patched inadequately.HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
_
.1` FN Se t:
ASC
17920.3-(a)
(6)
Unit F: -Rcof-damaged ceiling from leaks.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Unit G: Bathroom ceiling has a hole.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
` Heater not accessible.
�
HSC
17920.3(x)(6)
je-Smoke deEsr.
ctomis"sin`g or inoperable.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit H: ` Lavatory and,kitchen sink leaks
undPrz-;Lde•
HSC
17920.3(e)
aa'k.
HSC
17920.3(a)
(13)
Unit I`" :QE�df xcLm+�-.-_OQFrS{
HSC
17920.3(a)
(13)
Lavatory leaks.
HSC
17920.3(e)
Tnfee aerie e` Yaae S.
HSC
17920.3(a)(12)
Jr•iGr __r _.ice
Pace 7
No
heat.
De�-ericrated ceiling in bathroom.
ffaN - -
ri Smoke etector missina-or inoperable
Unit J:` j-, 3aeTr*arm i*s
ern est is aattioon of roaches.
Smoke detector missing or.incperable.
Unit K: 4 --No' heat. -
X eF
Smoke detector mission ar inadequate.
Unit L: Ceiling stained at living room, --
bedroom and hallway.
Smoke detector missing or inoperable-.
ADDRESS: 17281 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions:
Exterior surface: stucco damage.
Roof: wa_er sta-d_-g, broken blisters, leaks
Deck/Patio: surface and sheathing damage.
Stairs, Landings: treads, handrails and
guardrails. Replace damaged/loose railings and
treads to B, D, J, L, F and H.
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
'. HSC 17920.3(d)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
UFC 10.504(a)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(8)
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(g)
Exterior Fixtures: t�t2ighzrjg�xppse "HSC 17920.3(d)
Wall, Fences: broken fence.
Driveways/walkways: broken and raised sidewalk
Rain Gutter: broken and missing.
Interior Substandard Conditions:
Unit A:
'Smoke=detector-missing`=or1.inoperable:;
Unit 33
No
XSmokd detector inoperable or missing.:
Unit D:
Lavatory leaks underside.
:Smoke detector missing':
Unit E:
_Kitchen ;sink- faucet=it ••igs,-
Smoke,detector_ino�peraabblt_-or__miss n
TCC 5502(m)(3)
TCC 5502(m)(4)
HSC 17920.3(g)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(e)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(e)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(x)(13)
UFC 10.504(a).
McFadde_^. '1 ° 1130 ACarme its -.
February 22, 13ac
Page 8
Unit F:
Moldy walls in bathroom.
Unit G: _X Living room -is damp.-
>:-Smoke
amp.
>:.Smoke detectorinoperable_or.mssssng.-
- Unit H: ` Missing plaster on kitchen ceiling.
Unit I: Kitchen cabinet falling off.
X Smoke detector inoperable or -missing'
Unit J: Kitchen sink leaks.
Unit K: Shower floor is cracked.
Unit L: " Clogged kitchen sink.
€e5t4te�t e€ g_Q_e—eeo_'__s
ADDRESS: 17283 MCFADDEN AVENUE
HSC 17920.3(d)
HSC 17920.3(a).(12)
HSC 17920.3 (a) (13) -
HSC 17920.3(a)(11)
HSC 17920.3(a)(7)
HSC 17920.3(e)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13) .
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
Exterior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Exterior surface: stucco damage, holes in wall. HSC 17920.3(8)
Roof: water damage, leaks, standing water. HSC 17920.3(8)
CDeck/Patio: resurface, broken sheathing. HSC 17920.3(g).
Stairs/landings: replace damaged treads,
stringers, handrails, guardrails to unit A. HSC 17920.3(g)
Interior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Unit A.: Ceiling has water damage -and loose
plaster in hallway. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
X,Smoke detectors missing or .:inoperable.' UFC 10.504(a)
Unit B: Wall under the bathroom sink is broken
and exposed to the outside. HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
5,Smoke''detectors, missing=or,_ noperableY� UFC 10.504(a)
ADDRESS: 17285 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Exterior surface: moisture damage. HSC 17920.3(g)
Roo water damage, leaks; standing Ovate . HSC 17920.3(g)
u a= f 22. 1 _
:?CF
Deck/Patio: surface damace• HSC 17920.3(8)
Drs/windows/screens: missinc window screens
Stairs/landings: damaged treads, handrails,
guardrails, rot and termite damage. Replace
handrails, treads and guardrail to
units A, B, C and D.
Exterior Fixtures: illegal wiring of light fixture
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(g)
Interior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Unit A: V'Smoke detector missing or inoperable. UFC 10.504(a)
Unit CHeater not operating properly. HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
—Smoke detector missing or inoperable. UFC 10.504(a)
Laundry room:,kbroken drywall, missing vent cover HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
ADDRESS: 17287 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Exterior surface: stucco damage. HSC 17920.3(8)
Roof: water standing, damaged, leaks. HSC 17920.3(8)
Deck/Patio: surface damage. HSC 17920.3(g)
Stairs, Landings: treads, handrails termite
damage and broken; replace broken/damaged
treads and railings to units B, D, F and H. HSC 17920.3(8)
Wall, Fences: fence at unit A is detached
from wall. TCC 5502(m)(3)
Water Heater: door to enclosure is damaged. HSC 17920.3(g)
Interior Substandard Conditions: Code Violation
Unit
A:
Broken window in living room...HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Unit
C:
Crack,in wall and ceiling of-bthroojn.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Unit
D:
No, 'heat�.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Unit
E:
�!
HSC
17920.3(e)
eater not -accessible.
HSC
17920.3(a)(6)
Unit
F:
-
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
''Infestation of cockroaches.
HSC
17920.3(x)(12)
yG:Smoke,detector missin��� noperable.;
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit
G:
'Smoke=detirdtor�hxPs-s`Yig""6 nOperab3e.
UFC
10.504(a)
Unit
H:
XKitchen sink leaks underside.
HSC
17920.3(e)
=ebruary
Pace 10
,Z'Yaadeguate bathroom vents.
c-z_No heat...
T ''
Uni t I
>C mo a det ctor. miss -Ing or -inoperable,
Unit J: Ceiling damage.from-ioof leak.
Unit K: yc'Smoke-detector missing or.inoperable.
Unit L: Ceiling stain -from -leak.
ADDRESS: 17289 MCFADDEN AVENUE
Exterior Substandard Conditions:
Exterior surface: stucco damage.
Roof: water damage, leaks.
Deck/Patio: resurface, broken sheathing.
Drs/windows/screens: missing some window
screens.
Stairs/landings: replace damaged treads to
unit F.
Driveways, walkways: broken, loose slab
and raised
Landscaping: not maintained
Irrigation: broken with leaks; puddling at
sidewalk.
Rain Gutter: broken and missing downspout
Interior Substandard Conditions:
Unit A: Ceiling damage in living room from
plumbing leaks upstairs unit..
Damp floors.
>( Smoke detector missing or, inoperable
Unit B: Kitchen sink leak.
Ceiling water stained, damaged and
bowed at bathroom.
Smoke detector:_missing:_or_inoper'able-
unit C.
X li -est a_ e=_+ --o-=
Unit D: ,,_,,(No ` e.
�
access provided.)
HSC 17920.3(a)(7)
HSC 17920.3(a)(6)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(g)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(g)
TCC 5502 (m) (4)
TCC 5502 (m) (1)
TCC 5502(m)(2)
HSC 17920.3(8)
Code Violation
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(e)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
UFC 10.504(a)
HSC 17920.3(a)(13)
HSC 17920.3(a)(12)
McFadden Village Acarcmencs
February 22, 1995
Page 11
- ITnit E: Ceiling water:stained in bedroom. HSC 17920.3(a).(13)
Lar. faucet leaks, water closet leaks.
HSC
17920.3(e)
Eeae`es.
HSC
17920.3 (a)-(12')_
Unit F:_ Missing window -screens.
HSC
17920.3(a)(13)
Unit G: Ceiling cracked and damaged from
water. leak. _..
HSC
17920.3-(a)
(13)
- Wall under kitchen sink damaged,.
-a haliway_wa.11
HSC
17930.3'(x).(13).
Smoke �detectdr missirig�z*or-iroperab1e.
UFC
10.504(a)
MG:kd\reports\mcfapts.att
0
G- f� Community Redevelopment Agency
August 9, 1995 City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
Mr. Vinay Psi (714) 573-3106
Pai-25 Ltd. FAX (714) 573-3113
3745 W. Chapman #205 -
Orange, Ca 92668
Subject: Residential Rehabilitation Program, McFadden Village
Apartments, 17271-17289 McFadden Ave, Tustin..
Dear Mr. Pai:
I want to take this opportunity to make clear to you the funding
sources that the rehabilitation program has that can help off -set
the cost of rehabilitation of the subject property. I also want to
make clear your responsibility to correct any code violations
present at the property.
At the present time, the rehabilitation program has a grant for
$3000.00 for work to be done to the exterior of the property. In
addition, there is another $3000.00 grant that is to be used solely
to paint the exterior of the property. There is also a $1000.00
grant that is to be used to install security lighting on the
exterior of the building.
In addition to the grants, which do not have to be repaid, there is
a deferred loan program. The amount of the loan is based upon the
number of apartment units on the property. The loan is calculated
at the rate of $3000.00 per unit up to $25,000.00 per property.
There is a one-time simple interest charge of 716 on the loan
amount. The loan has to be repaid when the property is sold, title
transferred, or the property refinanced.
In regards to the subject situation, upon approval by the Loan
Committee, you are eligible to receive. up to $7000.00 in grants
($3000.00 for general rehabilitation, $3000.00 for painting, and
$1000.00 for security lighting), and a $25,000.00 deferred loan.
The total amount of funds from the rehabilitation program would be
$32,000.00
The rehabilitation funds are to be used to first correct any code
violations on the property. In this situation, an inspection of the
subject property was done by Tustin Code Enforcement. An inspection
report listing all code violation present at that time was prepared
and this inspection report was sent to you. To off -set the costs to
correct the code violations contained in the inspection report you. -
applied for rehabilitation funds and .solicited bids for the
rehabilitation work. The bids were subsequently sent to my office
for review. I prepared a spreadsheet of the bids to determine how
t/
Letter to Mr: Vinay Pai
Residential Rehabilitation Program
August 9, 1995
Page 2
C
much of the total cost could be funded by the rehabilitation
program and how much was to be the owner's responsibility. My
letter to you of May'16, 1995 (copy attached) reviewed the bids,
and asked why you proposed to reduce the scope of work. More
specifically, I inquired as to why you were reducing the scope of
work on the painting. Instead of having a complete painting of the
property at a bid price of $28,500.00 you revised the scope and
corresponding painting cost down to only $3305.00.
You explained your revision to the scope and cost of the painting
in your letter to me of May, 18, 1995 (copy attached). Briefly ij:
was your position that since the paint grant was only in the amount
of $3000.00 and the cost for the painting of all structures on the
property was bid at $28,500.00 that you were planning to only paint
the newly constructed areas. It was at this time that I, in an
attempt to assist you even further in the rehabilitation of the
property, initiated a revision to the funding level in the paint
grant program.
I met with city staff to determine what level of grant for your
size property would be. appropriate. It was our decision that
because the larger apartment complexes, such as yours are run as a
business by a partnership, as -opposed to the smaller four unit
buildings which are run as an investment by a single owner, that we
would proposed an increase to the paint grant program to a maximum
of $9000.00 per property. It was our intent to assist the property
owner as much as is reasonable, while still taking into account the
responsibility of the business to provide for on-going maintenance
of their property.
To insure that the increased paint grant amount would have a
lasting effect, it was -further proposed to have a covenant executed
between the property owner and City of Tustin. The covenant is to
insure that the property is maintained in accordance with all city
property maintenance ordinances. It is proposed to make the grant
repayable if there are any violations of the property maintenance
ordinance. The draft of the covenant 'and the staff report are
currently being finalized by staff. The matter may be brought to
the City Council very soon, when all concerns of staff and the City
Attorney are addressed.
Bringing all this back to the matter at hand, I feel that you have
three alternatives at this point. The first option is to not use
any rehabilitation program funds and complete the work required to
correct all code violations. If you select this alternative you. can
start work whenever your contractors have obtained. all required
permits.
'Alternative -two is -to, proceed in the rehabilitat-iori program with
the funding levels currently in place. -This -means that you may be
eligible to receive the aforementioned.$32,000.00 in.rehabilitation -
-Letter to Mr. Vinay Pai
Residential Rehabilitation Program
August 9, 1995
Page 3
funds. If you select this alternative, your contractors could start,
work after a 'final review .of your rehabilitation application is,
done by the Loan Committee, documents -signed and your contractors.
procure.,the applicable -permits.
Alternative three is to wait until the matter of increased funding
for the paint grant program is brought before the City Council. If
the increase is approved, then you would be eligible for an
additional $6000.00 in grant funds to off -set the cost of exterior
painting. If you select this alternative then work could start if
approval is given by the City Council to the increased grant, a
final review of you application for rehabilitation funds is done by
the Loan Committee, documents executed, and your contractors obtain
all applicable permits. ,
I have attached a spreadsheet that shows the bid costs, the amount
of the grants and loan, and your share of the costs. I have shown
what your anticipated costs would be with the current program
funding levels and your cost with the increased paint grant.
C I want to make it very clear that no matter what alternative you
choose, you are required to perform all work in the code
enforcement inspection report. In addition to this work, you will
be required to paint the exterior of all buildings and structures
at the subject property. While this violation may not have been
initially noted in the code enforcement report, the condition of
the paint on the buildings is a code violation and needs to be
corrected.
Should you have any questions please contact me
David Gottlieb
Redevelopment Project Manager
dave\pa14