Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 CODE AMEND 94-002 05-16-94AGENDA ,~)o 2 /~'-16-94 DATE: MAY 16, 1994 Inter-Com TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT:' CODE AMENDMENT 94-002 - REGULATION OF OUTDOOR VENDING ACTIVITIES, PUSHCARTS AND OTHER PORTABLE VENDING DEVICES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions: i . Approve the Environmental Determination for the project by adopting Resolution No. 94-58.; and . Have first reading by title only and introduction of Ordinance No. 1123, approving Code Amendment 94-002, as submitted or revised. FISCAL IMPACT There are no fiscal impacts to the City associated with this project. The proposed Ordinance is intended to establish a new subsection of the Tustin City Code to provide land use regulations. BACKGROUND In May 1992, the Community Development and Tustin Police Departments, as part of the Community Improvement Partnership Program (CIPP), presented a report to the City Council noting an increased number of pushcarts in the City. Staff believed that the increase occurred because the City of Santa Aha and other central Orange County jurisdictions adopted and implemented ordinances which regulate outdoor vending activities and pushcarts. It was anticipated that the occurrence of pushcarts within the City of Tustin, and their associated nuisances, could further increase as pushcart vendors displaced by the actions of other cities sought new markets. Pushcarts are non-motorized vehicles used for the conveyance of goods for sale, typically ice cream, flowers, hotdogs, tamales, etc. The uncontrolled existence of outdoor vending activities, pushcarts and other portable vending devices on. private property could result in home and business owner complaints regarding vendors positioning themselves near residences or business locations, luring customers, loitering, blocking sidewalks or City Council Report Code Amendment 94-002 Regulation of Outdoor Vending Activities May 16, 1994 Page 2 driveways, creating a trash problem, or presenting a potential security or safety risk to the general public. Other possible problems could include: increased noise generated by pushcart horns, bells or shouts of the operators, as well as a perceived health.risk associated with the sometimes unsightly or unsanitary' condition of the pushcarts or the goods for sale. As a result of the CIPP report, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 1088 in May of 1992 which immediately established interim regulations for pushcarts. After an extension to the Urgency Ordinance, the maximum extension allowed under State law, the interim measure will expire on May 18, 1994. Consequently, staff was directed to develop a permanent ordinance. A 'permanent Ordinance has now been completed. The Draft, which is included as Ordinance No. 1123, includes the addition of a new subsection, Subsection z, to "Section 9271 - Specific Provisions" and new definitions to "Section 9297 - Definitions" contained in the chapter of the Tustin City Code relating to zoning. On'May 9, 1994 the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive public testimony regarding the proposed pushcart ordinance. At that meeting the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3260 recommending to the City Council approval of Code Amendment 94-002. A public hearing notice identifying the time, date and location of the City Council public hearing on this project was published in the Tustin News and posted at the Tustin City Hall and Police Department. Since this project effects over 1,000 parcels, notices were not required to be mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. DISCUSSION The proposed Ordinance generally prohibits outdoor vending activities, pushcarts and other portable vending devices on any privately or publicly owned property. The Ordinance would allow pushcarts and other portable vending devices to operate in the following three instances only: 1) Wi[hin multi-use or multi-tenant shopping centers.with 30,000- square feet of leasable area or one acre of land area, with the approval of a Design Review application by the Director of Community Development; City Council Report Code Amendment 94-002 Regulation of Outdoor Vending Activities May 16, 1994 Page 3 2) At any special event, with the approval of a Temporary Use Permit by the Director of Community Development; and 3) At other appropriate sites, upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review application by the Planning Commission. The proposed Ordinance also provides for standards on hours of operation, and contains specific criteria for the design of pushcarts and portable vending devices, as well as the location and size of ancillary equipment such as cash registers and trash receptacles. Provisions of the previously adopted Urgency Ordinance have also been included in the proposed Ordinance. The Tustin City Code currently contains a number of sections relating to vending and peddling on public rights-of-way; outdoor sales, including rummage sales and swap meets; garage sales in residential areas; and solicitation. The following summarizes those existing code sections. Section 5330 - Stopping, Standing and Parking in General; Subsection 1- Unlawful Parking; Peddlers, Vendors. This section of the Tustin City Code prohibits any vehicle or pushcart, from which goods are sold, from being parked on any public right-of-way except at the request of a purchaser. The length of such a stop is limited to 10 minutes, thereby allowing roving vendors, such as ice cream trucks, to stop to make a sale. Vendors wishing to stop for longer periods of time, such as produce merchants selling from the back of a truck, would require the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. This code section would allow also regulate outdoor vending for parades, street fairs, and other types of large outdoor gatherings. Section 3631- Outdoor Sales This section of the Code prohibits rummage sales, "white elephant" sales and swap meets without the approval of the -License and Permit Board. While it is not specifically stated, staff has interpreted this sectiOn to relate to private property. City Council Report Code Amendment 94-002 Regulation of Outdoor Vending Activities May 16, 1994 Page 4 · Section 3640- Garage sales This section of the Tustin City Code defines a "garage sale" as a sale held in a garage, yard, lawn, patio etc. in a residential area for the purpose of disposing personal property. Such sales are limited to a maximum of four (4) times per calendar year. A provision also allows the site where the sale is conducted to be inspected by a representative of the City. Section 2523 - Business License Tax Schedules; Subsection d- Enumerated Businesses The sectionof the City Code relating to the Business License Tax contains an enumerated fee for solicitors including itinerant or transient merchants, vendors, peddlers and the like. This section of the code would pertain to door-to-door salespersons and charities, among others. While existing seCtions of the Code regulate certain aspects of outdoor vending on public rights-of-way, as noted above, the Code does not contain provisions to prohibit general outdoor vending on public property. Further, the Code does not adequately regulate vending on private property so that activities such as flower seller peddling from the corners of privately owned service stations are not allowed. The proposed draft Ordinance would include provisions in the Tustin City Code to prohibit outdoor vending activities, except where authorized by current ordinances. In addition, the proposal would limit the use of pushcarts and portable vending device to locations and sites authorized by City staff or Planning Commission approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION During the May 9th Planning Commission meeting, discussion focused on the staff-recommended process for approval of pushcarts and. other portable vending devices within the City's larger shopping centers through the Design Review process. The Tustin City Code gives general authority of approval over Design Review applications to the Director of Community Development or, under a recently adopted ordinance (Ordinance No. 1116), the Zoning Administrator. The Planning Commission currently has au%hority over Design Review applications only for projects located in the Tustin Ranch area. However, the Commission requested that City Council Report Code Amendment 94-002 Regulation of Outdoor Vending Activities May 16, 1994 Page 5 they be included in the review process for all design review applications related to pushcarts proposed within large commercial shopping centers. It was the Commission's desire that health and safety, design compatibility and other such issues be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to approval or denial of a request to utilize pushcarts or vending devices. Staff has amended the ordinance to reflect Commission direction as follows: "(1) (a) Within any commercial multi-use or multi-tenant shopping center with more than 30,000-square feet of leasable floor area or located on a site greater that one (1) acre in land area, with written consent~of the center owner or agent, ~~~~~ ~i~ii~~~i~~i~~ ~ .... "~'-'fi'~T'-'~'~Sroval o~ a~ ~:~::~::~:~:~'" ........... ~:~'~'~:~'" ............. '~'I'T~°~'~Ton by the Director or Community Development; and" Staff believes that the use of~ pushcarts can generate a positive atmosphere which should be encouraged in shopping centers, particularly for special events. The original recommendation for approval of a Design Review application for pushcarts or other portable vending devices in shopping centers with more than 30,000-square feet of leasable floor area or one acre of land area by the Director of Community Development is consistent with recent policy of the City Council, as well as current City ordinances. Including the Planning Commission in the review process could add substantial time to the overall approval process, thereby increasing the expense of City review for applicants. Should the Council concur with staff's original recommendation to limit Design Review approval to the Director of Community Development, staff recommends the following changes of language for Page 2, section (1) (a), of the proposed Ordinance: "(1) (a) Within any commercial multi-use or multi-tenant shopping center with more than 30,000-square feet of leasable floor area or located on a site greater that one (1) acre in land area, with written consent of the center owner or agent, and approval of a Design Review application by the Director of Community Development; and" City Council Report Code Amendment 94-002 Regulation of Outdoor Vending Activities May 16, 1994 Page 6 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. The attached Initial Study. indicates that few environmental impacts will result from the proposal. Attached Resolution No. 94-58 certifies the Negative Declaration as adequate for the code amendment. CONCLUSION Based upon the above analysis, amendments to Tustin City Code Sections 9271 and 9279 would provide permanent regulation of outdoor-vending activities, pushcarts and other outdoor vending devices thereby minimizing their negative impacts on the City, while allowing them where appropriate. The project meets the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, and would not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare of city residents. It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 94-58 and approve Code Amendment 94-002 by having first reading and introduction of Ordinance No. 1123. Christine Shin~eton Assistant CitytRanager PR: kd\CCREPORT\Pushca r t. rpt Attachments: Initial Study/Negative Declaration Resolution No. 94-58 Ordinance No. 1123 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94-58 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CERTIFYING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE FOR CODE AMENDMENT 94-002 INCLUDING REQUIRED FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The City Council finds and determines as follows: A® The request to approve Code Amendment 94-002 is considered a "project"'pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act. Be A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project and has been distributed for public review. Ce Whereby, the Planning Commission and the City Council of the City of Tustin have considered evidence presented by the Community Development Director and other interested parties with respect to the subject Negative Declaration. De The Planning Commission and the City Council have evaluated the proposed final Negative Declaration and determined it to be adequate and complete. II. A Final Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA and State guidelines. The City Council, having approval authority over Code Amendment 94-002, has received and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration, prior to recommending approval of the proposed project, and found that it adequately discussed the environmental effects of the proposed project. The City Council has found that the project involves no potential for an adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on wildlife resources and makes a De Minimis Impact Finding related to AB3158, Chapter 1206, Statutes of 1990. On the basis of the initial study and comments received during the public review process, the Planning Commission has found that, the proposed projects would not have a significant effect on the environment. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 94-58 Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 16th day of May, 1994. THOMAS R. SALTARELLI Mayor Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF TUSTIN SS CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 94-58 MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is 5; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 94-58 was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 16th day of May, 1994. COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER:ABSENT: MARY E. WYNN City Clerk PR: kd\cCresos\94 - 58. pr 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1123 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY TUSTIN REGULATING OUTDOOR VENDING ACTIVITIES AND THE OPERATION OF PUSHCARTS AND OTHER PORTABLE VENDING DEVICES IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN. The City Council of the City of Tustin finds and determines as follows: Ae Uncontrolled outdoor vending activities can result in complaints of pushcarts and other portable vending devices blocking sidewalks or driveways, creation of trash problems, potential security and safety risks to the general public, generating loud noise, and creating actual and/or perceived health risks associated with the sometimes unsightly or unsanitary appearance of vendors, pushcarts and/or their operators. S · Ce The incidence of outdoor vending activities, pushcarts, and portable vending devices within the City of Tustin, and their associated nuisances, has increased as nearby cities adopt .regulations which restrict or -displace vendors, pushcart owners or operators ~causing them to seek other areas as potential markets. The City of Tustin Zoning Code does not adequately regulate outdoor vending activities, pushcarts and other portable vending devices, their owners and operators within the City. D. The Tustin City Council has previously adopted interim urgency regulations for the operation of pushcarts and other portable vending devices in the City to protect the public safety, health, and welfare'while the permanent ordinance is being developed. It is desired that permanent regulations be adopted with the expiration of the Interim Urgency Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Tustin DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Article 9, Chapter 2, Part 7, Section 9271 of the Tustin City Code is hereby amended to add the following: "z. Outdoor Vending Activities, Vending Devices Pushcarts, Portable Consistent with other Sections of the Tustin City Code, outdoor vending activities are also hereby prohibited except as provided herein: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. 1123 Page 2 (1) Pushcarts or portable vending devices may operate within the City of Tustin in the following locations only: (a)~ Within any commercial multi-use or multi-tenant shopping center with more than 30,000-square feet of leasable floor area or located on a site greater than one (1)~ acre in land area, with written consent of the center, owner or a~ent, upon Planning Commission review and-approval of a proposal subject to the findings required for approval of a Design Review application, and upon final approval of a Design Review application by the Director of Community Development; (b) At any special event or activity, with limits to the number of pushcarts conditioned upon the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit, by the Director of Community Development; and (c) At other appropriate sites, upon issuance of a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review approval by the Planning Commission. (2) Pushcarts or portable vending devices may be operated or used for any outdoor vending purpose only during the business or operating hours of the shopping center or special event where located. In centers where one or more businesses operate on a 24-hour basis, the maximum hours of operation of pushcarts or porsable vending devices shall be 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. (3) Pushcart or portable vending device operators and pushcart or portable vending device owners shall have a valid City of Tustin Business License, and any necessary State, County or other City permit required by law, and shall .operate in accordance with regulations pertaining to those licenses and permits. (4) Design Standards The following design criteria and standards sha21 be considered in the evaluation of a Design Review application for pushcarts or other portable vending devices: (a) Location, number and size, including heigh%; (b) Design of the pushcart(s) or other por%ab!e vending device(s), including color and sigr..age, which shall be compatible with the design of the shopping center where the pushcart(s) is located; 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 Ordinance No. 1123 Page 3 (c) Ancillary equipment, such as cash register stands and trash receptacles; (d) Security - The design and location of pushcarts or portable vending devices shall minimize theft and vandalism. (5) One small compact stool or chair may be utilized by the pushcart or portable vending device operator. The chair or stool shall be placed within four feet of the pushcart and shall not block the safe passage of pedestrians or vehicles. No advertising shall be placed on the stool or chair. No additional seating shall be allowed. (6) A refuse bin of at least one cubic foot, shall be provided in, on or within three (3) feet of the pushcart(s) or other portable vending device(s). (7) Restrictions: (a) No· noise making devices shall be used in conjunction with pushcarts or portable vending devices. (b) Pushcarts or portable vending devices shall not be stationed for purposes of outdoor vending in any location which creates an unreasonable obstruction to the normal flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic; or within ten (10) feet of any intersection, driveway, or building entrance; or in any space designed for vehicular parking. (c) No signs or other advertising devices are permitted beyond those painted on or affixed to the pushcart, portable vending device or its canopy. Such signs shall be considered "vehicle signs", and shall be allowed in accordance with Tustin City Codes. Electrified or internally illuminated signs shall be prohibited. (d) Pushcart canopies, awnings or roofs constructed of fabric or other light-transmitting material shall, not be backlit. (e) All merchandise shall be maintained on the pushcart or portable vending device. Section 2. Article 9, Chapter 2, Part 9, Section 9297 of the Tustin City Code is hereby amended to add in alphabetical order the following: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. 1123 Page 4 "Portable Vendinq Device" means any stand, enclosure, booth, kiosk, instrument or mechanism intended to be temporarily used to display, distribute or sell food, beverage, product to the public. "Pushcart" means any wagon, cart, or similar wheeled container, which is not a "vehicle", as defined in the Vehicle Code of the State of California, from which food, beverage, or product is displayed, distributed or offered for sale to the public. "Pushcart or Portable Vendinq Device Operator" means any person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, stockholder, including, but not limited to, owners, operators, lessors and lessees, who operate a pushcart or portable vending device for the purpose of vending food, beverage, or product therefrom. "Pushcart or'Portable Vendinq Device Owner" means any person as defined herein owning or controlling one or more pushcarts and who: (1) Conducts or permits or causes the operation of such pushcart(s) or portable vending device(s) for vending food, beverage or product; (2) Owns, operates, controls, manages, or leases such pushcart(s) or portable vending device(s); or (3) Contracts with persons to vend food, beverage or product from such pushcart (s) or portable vending device ( s ) . "Special Event" means any commercial, civic, patriotic, religious, cultural, community or political event taking place on a specific date or dates or other such occurrence as determined by the Director of Community Development. "Vend or vendinq" means offering food, beverage, or product of any kind for outdoor sale on any publicly or privately owned sidewalk, drive aisle, street, alley, or unenclosed place open to the public, including the movement or standing of a pushcart or portable vending device for the purpose of searching for, obtaining or soliciting retail sales of products." Section 3. Severability Ail- of the provisions of the ordinance shall be construed and applied together in order to accomplish the purpose of these regulations. If any provision of this part is held by a court to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall apply only to the particular facts, determinations and part of this Ordinance, or if a provision is declared to be invalid or unconstitutional as applied to all 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. 1123 Page 5 facts, all of the remaining provisions of this ordinance shall continue to be fully effective. Section 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Article 18 of the State Guidelines, the proposed project has been found to be exempt from the requirements of CEQA, and therefore, no environmental documents are required. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of ~, 1994. THOMAS R. SALTARELLI MAYOR MARY E. WYNN CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) CERTIFICATION FOR ORDINANCE NO. 1123 MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 1994, by the following vote: COUNCILPERSONS AYES: COUNCILPERSONS NOES: COUNCILPERSONS ABSTAINED: COUNCILPERSONS ABSENT: MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk PR: kd\ORDINANC~ 1123. pr I · II. CITY OF TUSTIN Community Development Department ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY FORM Background 1. · · Address and Phone Number of Proponent Date of Checklist Submitted · · Agency Requiring checklist Name of Proposal, if applicable Environmental Impacts · Earth. Will the proposal result in: a· Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? be Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? · Ce Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d'e ' The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e· Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f · Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No · · ge Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Air. Will the proposal result in: ae Substantial air emission or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? Ce Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperatures, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Water. Will the proposal result in: a· be Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh water? Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or. the rate and amount of surface runoff? Ce Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? de Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e· Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f ~ Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ge Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception 'of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? · · 6. Yes Maybe No h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? ie Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a· Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? ,? be Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? Ce de Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to 'the normal replenishment of existing species? Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a.. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? be Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Ce Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? de Deterioration to existJ.ng fish or wildlife habitat? Noise· Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? be Exposure of people to severe noise levels? · · Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? - Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: Ye___~s Maybe No a· Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous, substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 11. Population. Will the proposal altler the location, distribution, density, or' growth rate of the human population of an area? 12' Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a · b· Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? de Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movemen~ of people and/or goods? Yes Maybe NO Se Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? fo Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14.' Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? bo Ce Police protection? Schools? de eo Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? bo Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? -~ b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? ,? ee f · Storm water drainage? - Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: ae Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? be Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Solid Waste. Will the proposal create additional solid waste requiring disposal by the City? 19. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista, or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an~'aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 20. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an · impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 21. Cultural Resources ae Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b~ Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? Ce Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Yes Maybe ~o de Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred use~ within the potential impact area? Yes Maybe N._9o 22. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a® Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment substantially reduce the habitat .of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate impOrtant examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? be Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact On the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future). Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) do Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation - See Attached .r IV. Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measure described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. forms\ i ni tstud. 94 S~gnatur~ % P~int ~e Print ~i~le PART III - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION EXHIBIT A INITIAL STUDY RESPONSES FOR CODE AMENDMENT 94-002 BACKGROUND In May of 1992, the City of Tustin Community Development Department presented a report to the City Council which detailed numerous impacts associated with unrestricted pushcart operation in the city. At that time Council adopted an Urgency Ordinance (No. 1088), immediately establishing interim regulations for pushcarts to be in effect for one year. That Urgency Ordinance was subsequently extended for an additional year and will expire in May of 1994. California State Planning, zoning and Development Law does not allow additional extensions to an urgency ordinance; therefore, Staff has been directed to develop a permanent ordinance relating to the regulation of outdoor vending activities, pushcarts, and portable vending devices. ,. Pursuant to provisions of the Tustin City Code, the proposed amendment to the "General Regulations" section (Section 9271) of the Zoning Code would prohibit outdoor vending' activities except for the use of pushcarts and portable vending devices in commercial shopping centers with more than 30,000-square feet of floor area, or with more than one acre of land area, and at special events or other locations, with an approved Temporary Use Permit or Conditional Use Permit. Specific design criteria and standards for operation and use of pushcarts and portable vending devices, as well as restrictions, are included in the ordinance. The proposed amendment would also contain definitions of terms used, and other requirements consistent with current state law. Upon adoption, the proposed ordinance would be effective throughout the City. 1. EARTH Items A throuqh G - "No": The proposed code amendment would not result in changes to existing earth conditions, topography or ground features. The proposed amendment would regulate the use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices in the city and specify development standards for their design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitorinq Required: None required. Exhibit A - Initial Study Responses Code Amendment 94-002 May 9, 1994 Page 2 2. AIR · · Items A throuqh C - "No": Based on review of AQMD standards for preparing Environmental Impact Reports, this project would not result in any degradation to existing air quality. The proposed amendment would regulate the use of pushcarts in the city and specify development standards and regulations for their design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code AQMD Standards. Mitiqation/Monitorinq Required: None required. · WATER , Items A throuqh I - "No": The proposed code amendment would not result in any changes to existing water conditions. The proposed amendmen-t would regulate the use of pushcarts and other' portable vending devices in the city and specify development standards for their design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitiqation/Monitorinq Required: None required. PLANT LIFE Items A throuqh D - "No": The proposed code amendment would not result in any changes to existing plant life. The proposed amendment would regulate the use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices throughout the city and specify development standards for their design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment ~ Tustin City Code Mitiqation/Monitorinq Required: None required. Exhibit A - Initial Study Responses Code Amendment 94-002 May 9, 1994 Page 3 5. ANIMAL LIFE · · Items A through D - "No": The proposed amendment would not result in any changes to existing animal life. The proposed amendment would regulate the use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices throughout the city, as well as specify development standards and regulations for their design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. NOISE Items A and B - "No": The proposed code amendment would not result in any changes to existing noise levels. The proposed ordinance would regulate the' use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices throughout the city, as well as specify development standards and regulations for their design, operation and use. Specific restrictions contained in the amendment prohibit noise making devices. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. LIGHT AND GLARE "No": The code amendment would not result in the creation of new light or glare. The proposed ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices throughout the city, as well as specify development standards and regulations for their design, operation and use. Specific restrictions contained in the amendment prohibit internally illuminated or electrified signs related to the pushcarts. No -development woul~ be associated with the proposal· Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. Exhibit A - Initial Study Responses Code Amendment 94-002 May 9, 1994 Page 4 8. LAND USE "No": The code amendment would not result in a substantial alteration of~present or planned land uses. The ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts or other portable ending devices. Specific provisions of the amendment restrict the operation of pushcarts to commercial shopping centers and other special locations. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. 9. NATURAL RESOURCES Items A and B - "No": The code amendment would not result in any changes to natural resources. The proposed ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices throughout the city, as well as specify development standards for their design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. 10. RISK OF UPSET Items A and B - "No": The code amendment would not increase risk of upset. The ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices throughout the city, as well as specify development standards for their design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. 11. POPULATION "No": The proposed code amendment would not increase or decrease the population of the City. The ordinance would Exhibit A - Initial Study Responses Code Amendment 94-002 May 9, 1994 Page 5 regulate the use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices throughout the city, as well as specify development standards for their design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitorinq Required: None required' · 12. HOUSING "NO": The proposed code amendment would not create a need for additional housing. The ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices throughout the city,, as well as specify development standards for their design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. ~ Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitiqation/Monitorinq Required: None required. 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION Items A through F - "No": The code amendment would not result in additional vehicular movement or demand for new parking and no impacts on existing transportation systems or present circulation patterns are expected. The ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts or other portable ending devices. Specific provisions of the amendment restrict the operation of pushcarts to commercial shopping centers and other special locations, and prohibits pushcarts from being stationed where they would create an unreasonable obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic flow. Pushcarts would be further restricted from using any vehicular parking space. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment ~ Tustin City Code Mitiqation/Monitoring Required: None required. Exhibit A - Initial Study Responses Code Amendment 94-002 May 9, 1994 Page 6 14. PUBLIC SERVICES Items A through F - "No": The code amendment would not have an impact on or result in an increased demand for or alter any public service. The ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices throughout the city, as well as specify development standards for their design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. 15. ENERGY Items A and B - "No": The code amendment would not create a substantial increase the demand for or consumption of energy. The ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts or other portable ending devices. Specific provisions of the amendment restrict the operation of pushcarts to commercial shopping centers and other special locations. Demands for electrical service to those facilities have been .accounted for in existing energy sources. No development would be associated with the proposal and the development of new energy sources would not be required. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. 16. UTILITIES Items A through F - "No": The code amendment would not increase the demand for traditional public utilities, such as water, natural gas, storm drains or sewers. The ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts or other portable ending devices. Specific provisions of the amendment restrict the operation of pushcarts to commercial' shopping centers and other special locations. Demands for utility service to those facilities have been accounted for in existing utility systems. No development would be associated with the proposal. Exhibit A - Initial Study Responses Code Amendment 94-002 May 9, 1994 Page 7 Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitorinq Required: None required. 17. HUMAN HEALTH Items A and B - "No": The proposed code amendment would not create new health hazards to those living or working in the vicinity. The ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices throughout the city, as well as specify development standards for their', design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. SOurces: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitorinq Required:. None required. 18. SOLID WASTE "Maybe": The code amendment would regulate the use of pushcarts or other portable ending devices. Specific provisions of the amendment restrict the operation of pushcarts to commercial shopping centers and other special locations. It is anticipated that authorized pushcarts may sell food or other products which could generate a minor amount of additional solid waste requiring disposal by the city. However, specific provisions of the ordinance prohibit a pushcart from operating without a refuse bin, and existing waste disposal systems will be adequate. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitiqation/Monitorinq Required: None required. 19. AESTHETICS "No": The code amendment would not impact any scenic vista or view. The proposed ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts or other portable ending devices. Specific provisions of the amendment restrict the operation of pushcarts to commercial shopping centers and other special locations. Pushcarts and other portable vending devices are Considered minor additions to existing facilities. Exhibit A - Initial Study Responses Code Amendment 94-002 May 9, 1994 Page 8 Consideration of views would have been addressed at the time of development of the shopping center where the pushcarts are located. No development is associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitorinq Required: None required. 20. RECREATION "No": The proposal will not create a need for additional recreational services or impact existing services. The ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices throughout the city, as well as specify development standards for their design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment Tustin City Code ~ Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. , 21. CULTURAL RESOURCES Items A through D - "No": The code amendment would not result in the alteration or destruction of archaeological sites and historic buildings, or cause a physical change which will affect cultural values. The proposed ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts or other portable ending devices. Specific provisions of the amendment restrict the operation of pushcarts to commercial shopping centers and other special locations. Pushcarts and other portable vending devices are considered minor additions to existing facilities. Consideration of cultural or historic resources would have been addressed at the time of development of the shopping center where the pushcarts are located. No new development is associated with the proposal. Sources: Proposed Amendment i~ Tustin City Code Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. Exhibit A - Initial Study Responses Code Amendment 94-002 May 9, 1994 Page 9 22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Items A throuqh D - "No": The proposed code amendment would not result in the degradation of the environment. There is no potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental goals. There are no cumulative impacts and there would be no adverse effect to human beings for the reasons stated above. The ordinance would regulate the use of pushcarts and other portable vending devices throughout the city, as well as specify development standards for their design, operation and use. No development would be associated with the proposal. Sources: As Previously Stated Mitiqation/Monitorinq: None Required. PR: CApshc t. ENV