Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout14 PC ACT AGENDA 03-07-94AGENDA___ ACTION AGENDA NO. 14 3-7-94 TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1994 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CALL: Present: Weil, Baker, Butler, Kasalek Absent: Stracker (arrived 7:02 p.m., after .......... roll-call) PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda.) · At this time members of the public may address the Commission regarding any items not on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission (NO action can be taken off-agenda items unless authorized by law). IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY MATTER, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE .OF THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE SO THAT YOUR REMARKS ON THE TAPE RECORDING OF THE MEETING CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO YOU. WHEN YOU START TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF. OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 1. Minutes of the February 14, 1994 Planninq Commission meetinq. Commissioner Kasalek moved, Baker seconded to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried. 4-0. Planning Commission Action Agenda February 28, I994 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS: IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM CONSIDERED AT A PUBLIC HEARING IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS AGENDA, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLICHEARING. - ................................ · Continued Public Hearinq - Modification to Conditions of Approval to Allow Time Extensions for Desiqn Review 88-70 and Variance 89-19 Recommendation -It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve a modification'to Condition No. 1.1 of Resolution No. 3153 to allow a six-month extension of Design Review 88-70 and Variance 89-19 by adopting Resolution No. 3232, as submitted or revised. Presentation: Becky Stone, Assistant Planner Commissioner Baker moved, Butler seconde~ to approve a modification to Condition No. 1.1 of Resolution No. 3153 to allow a six-month extension of Design Review 88-70 and Variance 89-19 by adopting Resolution No. 3232 as submitted. Motion carried 5-0. OLD BUSINESS: · Status Update on Deferral of Code Enforcement Action Reqarding 13922 Red Hill Avenue (Abandoned Pole Signs) Receive and file. Commissioner Kasalek moved, Baker seconde~ to receive and file this report. Motion carried 5-0. · Draft Amendments to City Code Section 9299, Office of the .Zoninq Administrator Recommendation -It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and comment on the proposed Draft Ordinance amending City Code Section 9299 related to the Office of the Zoning Administrator. Presentation: Dan Fox, Senior Planher Planning Commission Action Agenda February 28, 1994 Page 3 Commissioner Kasalek moved, Stracker seconded to direct the Community Development staff to prepare the environmental documentation as well as the final Draft Ordinance for public hearing to be held before the Planning Commission with the following changes to the Ordinance, amending City Code Section 9299, related to the Office of the Zoning Administrator as follows: 1., To instruct staff to refine modification to Draft Ordinance relative to dish antennas, namely to provide an additional qualification- for-~-those antennas.-within 300 feet of--a residential zone; 2., On the issue of Design Review, applications within project areas, it would be only where the Planning Conunission does not have Design Review authority currently under zoning codes or future adopted Specific Plans; and 3., Under appeal section, Item F, Page 6, Appeal to City Council, appeals could be made to City Council and/or-Redevelopment Agency as applicable. Motion carried 5-0. Commissioner Well moved, Butler seconded to instruct staff to prepare an appeal form which is user friendly and customer service oriented that would simplify the appeal process for those applicants interested in appealing a particular action to the Zoning Administrator. Motion carried 5-0. 5. Green Waste Report Receive and File Commissioner Baker moved, Butler seconded to receive and file the Green Waste Report. Motion carried 5-0. 6. Status Reports Receive and File Commissioner Baker moved, Kasalek seconde~ to receive and file the status reports. Motion carried 5-0. NEW BUSINESS: None STAFF CONCERNS: 7. Report on actions taken at February 22, 1994 City Council meeting Planning Commission Action Agenda February 28, 1994 Page 4 Staff reported on the subject agenda. Confirmation was made of those Commissioners attending the League Conference in San Diego. City Attorney Lois Bobak reported on the changes in the Brown Act which will become effective April 1, 1994. Her firm has prepared an outline of the amendments and copies of this will _be made_available~to the-Commissioner-s-and staff-following~its forwarding to City Council. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Commissioner Butler - Appreciated the research done on the Zoning Administrator issue. He stated that his only concern had been as to how the Commission's decision to relinquish some of their duties would be perceived by the public, but the well researched report which pointed out the savings in time and energy as well as a dollar saving to the residents of Tustin, helped to influence his decision to approve it. - Asked if the suggested change in the City Council meeting dates to Tuesday would affect the Planning Commission. Staff noted that it was unknown at this time. However should it occur, it was not likely to affect the Commission unless the City Council wanted to change the Commission's meeting night. Staff would not suggest exploring modifying the Planning Commission meeting date unless the Council wants it. Commissioner 'Baker - Mentioned Tustin Pride meeting of February 24th and asked staff to report on the outcome of the meeting, especially the issue of the buildings at Nisson and Browning and the sale of the Pinebrook apartments by Cal Trans. Staff reported on the meeting action agenda. Commissioner Stracker - Asked for an elaboration on the county issue with the Air Station. Planning Commission Action Agenda February 28, 1994 Page 5 Staff reported on the 6 applications for the site. Staff is working with the county to show them what types of uses would be conSistent with the direction the Task Force is going but has made clear to them that the City will not support any detention facilities. The City is recommending a 3 acre site to accommodate a child abuse facility and is trying to identify what .Law Enforcement needs are. The City is encouraging the Task Force to consider that a pistol range could be open to public, in conjuction with.the plans of a.Law. Enforcement training facility. The City is asking the county to concentrate on the land area identified for public benefit conveyance within the village area of the site. The City is not taking a position on the work furlough issue at this time. Commissioner Kasalek - Asked what City policy was concerning repair of streets. Staff reported that the City routinely monitors the condition of the streets through regular rehab and annual maintenance programs. Commissioner Weil - Commended the Director on having been appointed to the National Association of Base Developers. ADJOURNMENT- · Commissioner Baker moved, Butler seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is on March 14, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at 300 Centennial Way, Tustin.