HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1995 02 21MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
FEBRUARY 21, 1995
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 7:05 p.m. at the
Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The Pledge of
Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tem Potts.
INVOCATION
.The Invocation was given by Rev. Bill Gluli, Colonial Bible Church.
ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Thomas R. Saltarelli, Mayor
Jim Potts, Mayor Pro Tem
Mike Doyle
Jeffery M. Thomas
Tracy A. Worley
Council Absent:
None
City Clerk Wynn:
Absent
Others Present:
William A. Huston, City Manager
Lois Jeffrey, Interim City Attorney
Christine Shingleton, Assistant City Manager
W. Douglas Franks, Chief of Police
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Tim Serlet, Director of Public Works
Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent
Valerie Crabill, Chief Deputy City Clerk
Rita Westfield, Asst. Dir.\Com. Development
Bettie Correa, Senior Personnel Analyst
Dan Fox, Senior Planner
Dana Ogdon, Senior Planner
Rick Brown, Building Official
Rick Zimmer, Redevelopment Program Manager
Dave Gottlieb, Redevelopment Project Manager
Approximately 110 in the audience
PROCLAMATION
BLACK HISTORY MONTH
Mayor Saltarelli read and presented a proclamation to Helen Shipp
declaring February as Black History Month.
Helen Shipp, Orange County Black Historical Commission, thanked
Council for the proclamation and invited the public to attend
Black Exposition Day in Tustin on Saturday, February 25, 1995.
PUBLIC INPUT - None
PUBLIC HEARINGS ( ITEMS 1 THROUGH 3 )
1. APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-023 AND DESIGN REVIEW 94-030
(MCDONALDIS CORPORATION)
Dan Fox, Senior Planner, reported the applicant was proposing
establishment of a McDonald's Restaurant at the southeast corner
of Tustin Ranch Road and Bryan Avenue. He stated the proposed
restaurant would contain approximately 50 seats, a drive-thru
facility, and outdoor play area. On January 23, 1995, the
Planning Commission approved the proposed restaurant; however, on
January 30, 1995, staff received an appeal from a resident
opposing the project. He said that prior to the Planning
Commission meeting, the applicant had met with adjacent homeowner
associations who had expressed concerns regarding potential
increased noise levels caused by the drive-thru facility and trash
compactor use, signage lighting, and vehicle lights in the drive-
thru. Staff had proposed conditions of approval including
limiting hours of the play area and the drive-thru, relocating the
pad site, additional landscaping, illuminated signage turned off
at closing, and roof design. He stated the applicant had
indicated they would increase landscape screening to 4; feet and
would turn off exterior building lights after closing. He
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 2-21-95
summarized design guidelines for the shopping center;
architecture and lack of inverse condemnation damages and
potential City liability.
Mayor Saltarelli opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m.
The following members of the audience spoke in opposition to
Conditional Use Permit 94-023 and Design Review 94-030:
Randy Candias, 13595 Eucalyptus, Tustin
Steve Gould, 2189 Avocado Drive, Tustin
Richard Grace, 2482 Via Castillo, Tustin
William Kirkpatrick, Sycamore Glen resident
Jane Anderson, Sevilla Homeowners Association (submitted
homeowner letters opposing the project)
Steve Denlinger, 13516 Pecan, Tustin
Shari Sluder, 13522 Pecan, Tustin
Martin Gelband, 13515 Holly Drive, Tustin
Bruce Borden, 2332 Basswood Circle, Tustin
Kathy Kellerman, 2510 Calle LaMancha, Tustin
Aaron Morris, 13421 Montecito, Tustin
Pamela Gelband, 13515 Holly Drive, Tustin
Jennifer Short, 2464 Via Corella, Tustin
Scott Almquist, 2459 Calle Montella, Tustin
The following members of the audience spoke in favor of
Conditional Use Permit 94-023 and Design Review 94-303:
Howard Burns, McDonald's Corporation (submitted handout
regarding traffic study on Tustin Ranch Road and Bryan
Avenue)
James Frisbie, applicant
The following member of the audience spoke regarding a noise study
conducted at the proposed McDonald's restaurant location:
Fred Greve, Mestre, Greve and Associates
Council/ speakers Greve, Frisbie, and Burns discussion followed
regarding ambient noise level; noise analysis survey focused on
the Sycamore Glen area; car radio noise levels; lack of complaints
from residents regarding the McDonald's located on First Street;
relocation and limiting hours of speaker board; restaurant odor
emission; applicant proposal to enclose play area; eliminating the
tower; trash control; relocating the pad site; closing the drive-
thru at an earlier time; relocating the drive-thru; and the
importance of maintaining residential character.
The following member of the audience spoke in favor of the
proposed project and addressed a speaker's comments regarding
McDonald's response to the appellant's letter:
Tony Bondwell, McDonald's Corporation
There were no other speakers on the subject and the public hearing
was closed at 9:23 p.m.
Mayor Saltarelli recessed the meeting at 9:23 p.m.; the meeting was
reconvened at 9:35 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tem Potts stated Council represented all 60,000
residents; James Frisbie was a conscientious restaurant owner;
spot -zoning was prohibited; and pledged he would respond to
resident complaints regarding restaurant noise.
Councilmember Doyle noted the disadvantage of building a dinner
house at that location; the importance of the number of customer
orders to the success of the business; all parties should consider
compromises on site relocation; and residents and applicant should
work together for a solution.
Councilmember Thomas noted the number of businesses staff had
contacted as potential tenants on the site; stated his concern
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 2-21-95
regarding the future proposed Irvine market place across from the
Tustin Market Place; supported attracting new businesses to
Tustin; supported the McDonald's Restaurant; and suggested
continuing the item to allow further discussion between the
applicant and residents.
Councilmember Worley stated the issue should be decided
immediately; she supported McDonald's Restaurant at the location;
noted the compromises made by McDonald's; and favored at least a
15 -foot setback for the facility.
Mayor Saltarelli noted the importance of Council listening to both
sides of the issue; supported a setback and additional
landscaping; and noted modifications would mitigate the noise
levels.
Council/speaker Burns/staff discussion followed regarding a 10 to
15 foot setback; 4k foot berm in lieu of the screen wall; and area
landscaping.
It was moved by Thomas seconded by Doyle, to approve the
Environmental Determination for the project by adopting the
following Resolution No. 95-20:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-20 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (FINAL EIR
85-2, AS MODIFIED BY SUBSEQUENTLY ADOPTED SUPPLEMENTS AND ADDENDA)
IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROGRAM EIR FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
94-023 AND DESIGN REVIEW 94-030 AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION
MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Motion carried 5-0.
Christine Shingleton, Assistant City Manager, noted changes to
Resolution No. 95-21 including hours of operation on the drive-
thru facility; architectural modifications; relocation of the pad;
berm and screen wall; location of the speaker order board; and
requirement of a noise study.
It was moved by Thomas seconded by Worlev, to approve Conditional
Use Permit 94-023 and Design Review 94-030 by adopting the
following Resolution No. 95-21 as modified:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-21 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT 94-023 AND DESIGN REVIEW 94-030 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION
OF A 2,871 SQUARE FOOT FAST-FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU
SERVICE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TUSTIN RANCH ROAD AND
BRYAN AVENUE ON LOT 1 OF TRACT 14610
Council/speakers discussion followed regarding the final setback
distance and McDonald's commitment to attempt the maximum setback
of 15 feet.
Motion carried 5-0.
2• CODE AMENDMENT 95-001 (CITY OF TUSTIN)
610-40
Dan Fox, Senior Planner, reported that the City Attorney's office
had proposed zoning code amendments stipulating that an applicant,
who had been denied a permit, could not re -apply for the same
project for a period of one year unless the project had been
substantially modified.
Mayor Saltarelli opened the public hearing at 10:23 p.m. There
were no speakers on the subject and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved_ by Worlev seconded by Thomas, to approve the
Environmental Determination for the project by adopting the
following Resolution No. 95-23:
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 2-21-95
RESOLUTION NO. 95-23 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL NEGATIVE
REQUIRED FI FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA AS ADEQUATE FOR CODE EENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
NT 95-001 INCLUDING
REQUIRED
ACT
Motion carried 5-0.
It was moved by Thomas seconded by Worley, that Ordinance -No.
1146 have first reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0.
Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1146 by the
Chief Deputy City Clerk, it was moved by Doyle seconded by
Worley, that the following Ordinance No. 1146 be introduced:
ORDINANCE NO. 1146 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CODE AMENDMENT 95-001, ADDING
SUBSECTION (e) REGARDING REAPPLICATION FOR DISCRETIONARY LAND USE
APPROVALS, AND SUBSECTION (f) REGARDING REQUESTS FOR MODIFICATION
OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, TO SECTION 9293 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE
Motion carried 5-0.
3. ZONE CHANGE 94-006 (CALIFORNIA PACIFIC HOMES)
460-50
Dan Fox, Senior Planner, reported the applicant was proposing an
amendment to the East Tustin'Specific Plan regarding the location
of patio covers in patio home developments; building set back
requirements would conform to the Uniform'Building Code; and the
changes would provide greater flexibility in locating patio covers
in the patio home developments.
Mayor Saltarelii opened the public hearing at 10:25 p.m. There
were no speakers on the subject and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Potts, seconded by Thomas, to approve the
Environmental Determination for the project by adopting the
following Resolution No. 95-22:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-22 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (FINAL EIR
85-2, AS MODIFIED BY SUBSEQUENTLY ADOPTED SUPPLEMENTS AND ADDENDA)
IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROGRAM EIR FOR ZONE CHANGE 94-006 AND
ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS
REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Motion carried 5-0.
It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Worley, that Ordinance No.
1145 have first reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0.
Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1145 by the
Chief Deputy City Clerk, it was moved by Thomas seconded by
Worley, that the following Ordinance No. 1072 be introduced:
ORDINANCE NO. 1145 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 94-006 TO AMEND
SUBSECTION "a" OF SECTION 3.6.3.C3 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC
PLAN ENTITLED "PROJECTIONS INTO REQUIRED SETBACKS" RELATED TO THE
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PATIO COVER AND
TRELLIS STRUCTURES WITHIN PATIO HOME DEVELOPMENTS
Motion carried 5-0.
CONSENT CALENDAR ( ITEMS 4 THROUGH 18 )
610-60
It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Thomas, to approve the Consent
Calendar as recommended by staff. Motion carried 5-0.
4. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS
Recommendation: Approve Demands in the amount of $1,937,854380-10
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 2-21-95
S. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 1, 1995 SPECIAL MEETING AND
FEBRUARY 6, 1995 REGULAR MEETING
Recommendation: Approve City Council Minutes of February 1 and
February 6, 1995.
6. 1994-95 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SCHEDULE/STATUS REPORT UPDATE
(SECOND QUARTER)
Recommendation: Receive and file subject report as recommended by
the Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
730-90
7. APPROVAL OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH TUSTIN MUNICIPAL
EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION (TMEA)
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute subject
Memorandum of Understanding with the Tustin Municipal Employees
Association as recommended by Personnel Services.
400-10
8•40-40
RESOLUTION NO. 95-18 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHECITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND
AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND INTERCONNECT AT JAMBOREE ROAD
AND TUSTIN RANCH PLAZA
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 95-18 accepting said work as
complete and authorize the recordation of the Notice of
Completion; and direct the City Clerk to (1) Release the Labor and
Materials Payment Bond not sooner than thirty-five (35) days after
the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion and (2)
Release the Faithful Performance Bond not sooner than one year
after the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion as
recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
9• CONCEPT APPROVAL FOR PETERS CANYON CHANNEL 400-45
EMBANKMENT RESTORATION, MOFFETT DRIVE TO SCRRA/OC A N RAILWAY
(COUNTY OF ORANGE PROJECT)
Recommendation: Approve in concept the Peters Canyon Channel
(F06) Embankment Restoration Project from Moffett Drive to
SCRRA/OCTA Railway as requested by the County of Orange and as
recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
10. SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR COST OF RELOCATION8OF0
TENANTS AT CITY -OWNED PROPERTY (PROJECT NO. 700116)
Recommendation: Authorize a supplemental budget appropriation of
$200,000 from the unappropriated reserve of the Measure M Turnback
funds to Project No. 700116 (E1 Camino Real Widening). These
funds will be utilized for the Relocation Benefit Payments to the
tenants of the City -owned apartments at 1921-1951 E1 Camino Real
as recommended by the Public Works Department. 400-10
11. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE ANNUAL ASPHALT CONCRETE REHABILITATION
AND OVERLAY PROJECT, FY 1994-95
Recommendation: Award the FY 1994-95 Asphalt Concrete
Rehabilitation and Overlay Project contract to R.J. Noble Company
in the amount of $443,860.36 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division.
400-45
12. STATUS REPORT: TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT FIRST STREET/NIB'#
STREET (CIP NO. 800048)
Recommendation: Defer implementation of the subject project to a
future fiscal year and direct staff to monitor the location and
return the project for Council consideration when traffic
conditions indicate that installation of a traffic signal is
appropriate as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division.
760-65
13. RESOLUTION NO. 95-25 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THAT THE ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONDUCT EVENING MEETINGS AND PROVIDE TWO
PUBLIC INPUT OPPORTUNITIES DURING THE MEETINGS
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 95-25 requesting the Orange
County Board of Supervisors conduct evening meetings and provide
an opportunity for the public to address the Board as recommended
by the Office of the City Clerk.
150-20
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 2-21-95
14. RESOLUTION NO. 95-19 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO THE COMPENSATION OF
CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 95-19 granting confidential
employees the same compensation and benefits as other general
employees as recommended by Personnel Services.
520-20
15. STATUS REPORT - COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
by
Recommendation: Receive and file subject report as recommended010-40
Community Services Department.
16. RESOLUTION NO. 95-24 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND
AUTHORIZINGFOR DATION OF NEWPORT AVENUES OF AND WARRENON FOR THE WATER AVENUE, PROJECT MAIN
REPLACEMENT FOR
600101
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 95-24 accepting said work
and authorizing the recordation of the Notice of Completion as
recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
400-45
17. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - FEBRUARY 13, 1995
All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless
appealed by the City Council or member of the public.
Recommendation: Ratify Planning Commission Action Agendaof
February 13, 1995.
18. NEW MEMBERS FOR THETUSTINCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Recommendation:. Appoint Carol Schroeder and Ileana Lopez to the
Board of DirethesFoundat on Board of of the Tustin
Foundation
recommended by of Directors and Community
Services Department. 125-45
REGULAR BUSINESS ( ITEMS 19 THROUGH 26 )
19. IMPLEMENTATION OF REVISED CONSTRUCTION NOISE REGULATIONS
It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Worley, that Ordinance No. 1143
have second reading by title only. Motion carried 4-0, Potts
abstained.
Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1143 by
the Chief Deputy city Clerk, it was moved by Doyle seconded by
Thomas, to adopt the following Ordinance No. 1143:
ORDINANCE NO. 1143-- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SPECIFIEDSECTIONS OF ARTICLE -4 OF
THE TUSTIN CITY CODE, HEALTH AND SANITATION
Motion carried 4-0, Potts abstained (roll call vote). 230-65
20. CITY COUNCIL/COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES RELATIONSHIPS
Councilmember Thomas stated that recent discussion with City
Commission/ Committee members revealed unfamiliarity with the Brown
Act. He requested the City Attorney conduct a Brown Act workshop
for City Commissions and Committees.
Council/staff discussion followed regarding the City Attorney's
availability to conduct the workshops without charge; past
practice of informing Commission/Committee members of the Brown
Act; and including conflict of interest in the workshop. 120-05
21. ORANGE COUNTY BANKRUPTCY STATUS
William Huston, City Manager, reported the Board of Supervisors
voted to re -approve the Fire Authority Joint Powers Agreement
(JPA); Board of Supervisors' position that the Orange County
bankruptcy had created questions in the feasibility of approving
the Fire Authority JPA;
Orange
JPA;County
and thecities
Firepressuring
Author Authority JPAwas Board of Supervisors to approve
effective March 1, 1995.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 2-21-95
Mayor Saltarelli noted that Board of Supervisors Silva and Stanton
voted in opposition to the Fire Authority JPA.
William Huston, City Manager, stated the Orange County bankruptcy
impact on the City was approximately $447,000.00; the 800
megahertz communication system and assessment district bond
refinancing could be affected by the bankruptcy; and potential
�-. impacts on various County services.
Mayor Saltarelli stated that at the recent Creditor's Committee
meeting, questions arose regarding, whether the seven -member
Committee was speaking for the people they represented; noted
Irvine City Manager Paul Brady had indicated he would vote
according to the desire of the 31 represented cities; questioned
the acceptability of the County's proposed plan; and the
Creditor's Committee must vote at the direction of the agency
represented.
150-20
22• GRAD NITE 1995 REQUEST FOR CONTRIBUTION
The following member of the audience requested a $4,000.00
contribution for the 1995 Tustin High School Grad Nite:
Pete Seitz, Tustin High School Grad Nite Committee.
Council/speaker discussion followed regarding the lack of
available funding sources for the Grad Nite party.
Councilmember Worley stated concern that the contribution would
not be used for educational purposes; therefore, she would not
support the Committee's request for funding.
Councilmember Thomas stated that because of the County bankruptcy,
lack of funding sources, and Foothill High School's
request for a grad Hite contribution he supportedPending
$2,750.00, the same amount the City contributed n99411ocating
Mayor Pro Tem Potts stated he would abstain from voting on this
issue because his son was a Tustin High School graduating senior.
Council/speaker discussion followed regarding the Grad Nite
Committees' goals included maintaining low student admission
prices; 100 percent graduating student attendance; and a variety
of activities consistent with last year's grad nite.
Mayor Saltarelli stated preventing one automobile accident
justified a contribution to the Grad Nite Committee; suggested a
$3,000.00 allocation; and supported the safe environment for
graduating students provided at Grad Nite.
It was moved by Saltarelli seconded by Do le, to appropriate
$3,000.00 to Tustin High School Grad Nite.
Motion carried 3-1, Worley opposed, Potts abstained. 330-20
23• STATUS OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
Christine Shingleton, Assistant City Manager, reported that
Request for Proposals (RFP) had been forwarded to consultant
firms; the zoning ordinance amendment process had been included in
the budget; RFP's would be reviewed in April 1995; and the project
should commence in July 1995.
24. 1995 AUDITOR SELECTION 610-70
Mayor Saltarelli expressed concern that support material from each
firm had not been forwarded to Council allowing full review of
qualifications and background; and requested continuance of this
selection.
The following member of the audience spoke regarding submitting
summaries of each firm to Council:
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 8, 2-21-95
Walt Sullens, Audit Committee
It was moved by Saltarelli seconded by Potts, to continue this
item.
Motion carried 5-0. 310-05
25. AB13 (STATE MANDATED SMOKING REGULATIONS)
William Huston, City Manager, reported that staff recommended the
City's current smoking ordinance remain in place in the event that
AB13 was repealed or subjected to court challenges. He clarified
that at this time, the City would not enforce beyond the minimum
guidelines of AB13.
It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Worley, to direct staff to
adhere to the regulations set forth in AB13; have the City's
smoking ordinance remain in place until it is clear there will be
no court challenges to AB13 or attempts to repeal it. If after a
reasonable period of time it appears that AB13 will continue to be
in place, then the City Council could repeal the City's smoking
ordinance; -and designate Community Development code enforcement
personnel and the Police Department, as authorized, to enforce
AB13. The Community Development Department would have primary
enforcement responsibility with the Police Department as backup
(i.e. after regular City business hours).
240-70
Motion carried 5-0.
26. 1994-95 MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW
It was moved by. Sal tare lli, seconded by Doyle, to continue this
item.
330-50
Motion carried 5-0.
PUBLIC INPUT- None
OTHER BUSINESS
CONTINUE CLOSED SESSION ITEM NO. 1
William Huston, City Manager, requested continuing Closed Session
Item No. 1 to the March 6, 1995 Council meeting.
HIGH SCHOOL BASKETBALL FINALS
Councilmember Doyle stated that the Tustin High School basketball
team had reached the quarter finals and wished them luck.
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Mayor Pro Tem Potts requested a report on traffic signals with
five displays and signage he observed in Las Vegas, Nevada.
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIOLATIONS
Mayor Pro Tem Potts reported on Housing and Urban Development
violations occurring at Tustin Garden Care Home.
William Huston, City Manager, responded that varying facts had
been reported to staff and the matter would be investigated.
POLICE DEPARTMENT TASK FORCE
Councilmember Worley commended the police department on their
successful task force arrest operation.
BABY GIFT
Councilmember Thomas thanked a resident for receipt of a baby
gift.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 9, 2-21-95
LETTER TO SUPERVISORS STANTON AND SILVA
Mayor Saltarelli requested a mayoral letter be forwarded to Orange
County Supervisors Stanton and Silva opposing their obstruction to
formation of the Joint Powers Fire Authority.
CLOSED SESSION
Council concurred to continue closed session: (1) to confer with the Cit
Manager regarding compensation for management employees, to the March 6y
1995 Council meeting.
Mayor Saltarelli announced the City Council would convene in closed
session (2) to confer with the City Attorney regarding the initiation of
litigation [Government Code Section 54956.9(c)]; ten (10) potential cases.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Saltarelli adjourned the meeting at 11:03 p.m. The next regular
meeting of the City Council was scheduled for Monday, March 6, 1995, at
7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 300 Centennial Way.
FOLLOWING CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Saltarelli announced that the City Attorney had been given direction
to initiate ten (10) code enforcement actions. The defendants and other
particulars shall be identified once the actions have been filed. This
information would be made available to the City Clerk within the next
three (3 ) weeks.
THOMAS R. SAL;A LLI, MAYOR
g4'1RY E. WYNN, CITY CLERK