HomeMy WebLinkAbout23 TRAFFIC STUDY 02-07-94NO. 23
2-7-94
DATE-
FEBRUARY 7, 1994
Inter-Com
TO: WILLIAMA. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
SUBJEC~ ~,,~FI¢ STUDY AT THE INTERSECTION OF EL C~INO R~ANDO~GE
STREET
RECOMMENDATION:
Pleasure of the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT:
It is estimated that the cost to install a traffic signal at the
subject intersection including engineering and construction charges
is approximately $130,000.00.
~ACKGROUND:
At the November 15, 1993 City Council meeting, Mayor Potts
expressed concern regarding school children crossing E1 Camino Real
at Orange Street. It was indicated that there currently is not a
marked crosswalk at that intersection.
The Engineering Division was directed by the City Council, at the
December 6, 1'993 meeting, to prepare a traffic study, utilizing
existing City resources, investigating the possible installation of
a crosswalk or additional traffic control devices at the subject
intersection.
DISCUSSION:
The Engineering Division has completed the traffic investigation of
the subject location. A copy of the Traffic Study is attached for
your information.
The Traffic Study indicates that due to the vehicular traffic and
pedestrian activity at the subject location, that established
traffic signal warrants have been satisfied. However, this does
not necessarily justify the installation of a traffic signal at
this location. For purposes'of the Study, the pedestrian counts
considered at the subject location included not only pedestrians
crossing E1 Camino Real at Orange Street, but also pedestrians
randomly crossing E1 Camino Real between the easterly property line
of the High School and the intersection of E1 Camino Real/Newport
Avenue.
It was observed that a large number of High School students
crossing E1 Camino Real do not necessarily cross at the subject
intersection, nor the signalized intersections of E1 Camino
Real/Newport Avenue or E1 Camino Real/Red Hill Avenue, but rather
randomly cross E1 Camino Real at a diagonal angle during gaps in
vehicular traffic. The signalized intersection of E1 Camino
Real/Newport Avenue is located approximately 600-feet westerly of
the subject intersection and includes full pedestrian protection to
cross E1 Camino Real. Due to the street crossing characteristics
of the students at the subject location, there is no guarantee that
the installation of a traffic signal at the subject intersection
will cause a modification of this behavior.
In the ~tudy, staff considered the installation of an all-way stop
at this intersection as an interim measure until such time as a
traffic signal may be installed. It was determined that due to the
high potential for rear-end type accidents and an anticipated high
level of noncompliance of the stop signs on E1 Camino Real, that it
would not' be appropriate to install an all-way stop as an interim
measure.
Also, staff considered the installation of a flashing yellow and a
flashing red beacon with marked crosswalks at this location. Based
upon the aforementioned concerns, it was determined that the
installation of a yellow or red flashing beacon unit would not be
appropriate with marked crosswalks at this location. The marked.
crosswalk installation would, be best accommodated with the
concurrent installation of a traffic signal providing for full
control of the intersection.
The results .of the Traffic Study have been discussed with the
Tustin Police Department, the Tustin Unified School District, and
Tustin High School. The staff of Tustin High School has indicated
that they routinely advise students to cross E1 Camino Real at the
signalized intersections.
CONCLUSION:
Based upon the results of the Traffic Study for the subject
location, all-way stops, flashing yellow or flashing .red beacons-
along with 'marked crosswalks would not be appropriate traffic
control devices to install at this time. If marked crosswalks are
installed, it should be in conjunction with the installation of a
traffic signal at this location to provide for full control of the
intersection.
However, two adjacent signalized intersections currently exist at
E1 CaminO Real/Newport Avenue (only about 600-feet away) and E1
Camino Real/Red Hill Avenue, which provide full control for
~ehicular and pedestrian traffic. Due to the street crossing
characteristics of students crossing E1 Camino Real, the
installation of a traffic signal may not modify these crossing
patterns.
Robert S.
Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
RSL: DA: x'walk4
Dougl~as R. Anderson
Transportation Engineer
A~t
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY
FOR THE INTERSECTION OF
EL CAMINO REAL AND ORANGE STREET
By
Charles ~at~
CITY OF TUSTIN
Engineering Division
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA. 92680
(714) 573-3140
January 20, 1994
SUBJECT-.
Investigation to determine if a traffic signal would be an adequate
traffic control device for the intersection of E1 Camino Real and Orange
Street.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
It is recommended that the installation of a traffic signal at the
intersection of E1 Camino Real and Orange Street be programmed into the
City's Capital Improvement Program for construction in the near future.
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUF_S OR PROBLEMS:
At the City of Tustin's City Council. Meeting of November 15, 1993, Mayor
Potts expressed concern regarding school children crossing E1 Camino
Real at Orange S~reet. A meeting with the Tustin Police Department, the
Tustin Unified School District, and staff of Tustin High School was held
on December 16, 1993 to discuss the issues involved with children
crossing E1 Canino Real near Tustin High School. The City was
encouraged at 5he meeting to continue its study at the subject
intersection.
The Tustin High School fronts~E1 Camino Real on its northerly side from
the intersection of Orange Street-to 600 feet easterly. A large number
of school pedestrians currently cross E1 Camino Real near the
intersection of Orange Street. In conjunction with the I - 5 freeway
widening~ E1 Camino Real was. widened from one travel lane in each
direction to two travel lanes in each direction with a two way left turn
lane in the median between Red Hill Avenue and Newport Avenue. At the
subject intersecsion, the median lane is replaced by a left turn lane to
.accommodate lef- turn movements from eastbound E1 Camino Real to
northbound Orange Street. When the street was widened, it was determined
that the marked school crosswalk at the study intersection would be
removed due to the street upgrade which, increased additional exposure
of pedestrians to potential traffic conflicts. Currently, school
pedestrians desiring to cross E1 Camino Real have the opportunity to
crgss E1 Camino Real at the signalized intersections of Red Hill Avenue
or Newport Avenue. However, school pedestrians have continued to cross
E1 Camino Real a- Orange Street in large numbers, as is demonstrated by
the data used in this study.
PAGE 2
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY FOR THE INTERSECTION OF EL CAMINO
REAL AND ORANGE STREET
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The installation of traffic signals are typically justified by
satisfying established warrants along with evidence of conditions that
demonstrate the need for traffic signal control of traffic right-of-way.
The City uses traffic signal warrants established by Caltrans and
currently found in the Caltrans Traffic Manual.
This study is u~dertaken in order to determine if the installation of a
traffic signal at the subject intersection is warranted at this time.
The study was conducted using data collected in March 1993.
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS:
EXISTING CONDITION
E1 Camino Real in the study area is a four lane secondary arterial
street connecting Red Hill Avenue and Newport Avenue. The intersections
of Newporz Avenue and E1 Camino Real, and Red Hill Avenue and E1 Camino
Real are both signalized. Orange Street is a two lane local street
intersecting E1 Camino Real on the north side and is located about 660
feet east of Newport Avenue. A left turn lane is striped on E1 Camino
Real at Orange Street for the eastbound to northbound traffic movement.
E1 Camino Real has a current' traffic volume of 12,400 ADT. The 85th
percentile speed is 41.9 mile-per-hour (MPH); the posted speed limit is
35 MPH. Orange Street has an ADT of 1560. A 9-hour count of pedestrians
found 635 crossing at Orange Street.
PAGE 3
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY FOR THE INTERSECTION OF EL CAMINO
REAL AND ORANGE STREET
Traffic signal warrants have beenprepared for the subject intersection.
The following warrants are currently satisfied: Warrant 2, Interruption
of Continuous Traffic; Warrant 3, Minimum Pedestrian Volume; Warrant 4,
School Protection. It' should be 'noted that .warrants 9, Four Hour
Volume, and 11, Peak Hour Volume are close to being satisfied. None of
the other warrants investigated are satisfied. See Table I below:
Table I
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY
olumc; 4- School Crossings; 5-Progrc.ssivc Movcmcnt; 6-Accidcnl Expcr~cncc;
7-.Syr. m3~; ~mbi~,m; 9-Fc.Jr Hour Volumc; 10-Pcak Hour Dclay; ll-Pcak'Ho~r Volumc.
A-traffic accident summary was compiled for the subject intersection
from January 1990 through November 1993 as shown in the following table:
PAGE 4
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY FOR THE INTERSECTION OF EL CAMINO
REAL AND ORANGE STREET
Table II
TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SUMMARY
LOCATION
Date
1/26/90
5/25/90
6/ 7/90
5/ 2/91
10/ 4/91
11/22/91
6/17/92
9/30/92
10/ 5/92
11/22/92
3/17/93
8/27/93
EL CAMINO REAL (E/W) AT
o~cE STRE~.T (~/s)
Accident Description
EB vehicle hit stopped EB vehicle that
had stopped for pedestrians.
SB vehicle hit stopped SB vehicle.
SB vehicle stopped, then turned left
into path of EB vehicle.
EB bike on wrong side of street hit SB
vehicle that had stopped and then
pulled out.
WB vehicle hit stopped WB vehicle that
has stopped for pedestrians.
EB vehicle hit NB pedestrian outside
of crosswalk; pedestrian found at
fault.
EB vehicle hit stopped EB vehicle
stopped for pedestrian.
EB vehicle hit stopped EB vehicle
stopped for pedestrian.
EB vehicle hit stopped EB vehicle
stopped for pedestrian.
EB vehicle ran off road.
WB vehicle sideswiped another WB
vehicle.
SB vehicle turned left into EB vehicle
turning left.
tS~') = ~gW~,t Dir~Uo~; ~qlS) = No~5~ Dir~Uo.; I-'_B = ~R~md; WG = wcs~o~nd; S3 = ~
Comment.
Tustin High School fronts on a secondary arterial street where the
eighty-fifth percentile speed exceeds 40 miles per hour. This speed
mandates the use of rural conditions when determining traffic signal
warrants.
PAGE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY FOR THE INTERSECTION OF EL CAMINO
REAL AND ORANGE STREET
Warrant 2, Interruption of Continuous Traffic, is considered I00 percent
satisfied. It should be noted that the lower level of the minor approach
volume is 53; one of the hours used in satisfying the warrant had a
volume of 52 and another has 51; both of these volumes were considered
good for satisfying this warrant Warrant 2 is considered a major
warrant. '
Warrant 3, Minimum Pedestrian Volume, is apparently 100
satisfied. Since this study is being conducted with existing percent
field data exists and has not been collected for available gaps data, no
per hour
in the E1Camino Real traffic stream of adequate length for pedestrians
to cross. Based on the gap formula given in Chapter 10 of the Caltrans
Traffic Manual, .an adequate'gap would be approximately 25 seconds. The
warrant states that the gap part of the warrant is satisfied if" there
are less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traffic of adequate
length for pedestrians to cross." Given the traffic volume on E1 Camino
Real it is unlikely that 60 gaps of 25 seconds exist in any of the hours
of heavy pedestrian use. The other 3 parts of the warrant are
satisfied.
Warrant 4, School Protection, is satisfied by a wide margin.
Traffic signal warrants represent the lowest possible threshold at which
a =raffic signal could be installed. Caltrans prints the following on
its traffic signal warrant sheets: "The satisfaction of a warrant is not
necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or
other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown."
The intersection is lOcated 660 feet east of the signalized intersection
of Newport Avenue and E1Camino Real. The signalized intersection of
Red Hill Avenue and E1 Camino Real is located about 200'0 feet east of
the subject intersection.
The pedestrian and traffic volume counts were taken after the painted
crosswalk across E1 Camino Real was removed. A large number of school
pedestrians continue their walking habits by crossing at Orange Street
ra~her than at one of the nearbY signalized intersections. While the
subject intersection could be posted for a no pedestrian crossing across
E1 Camino Real, the Drohibition would likely have little effect on the
walking habits of th~ school pedestrians.
Based upon the speed of the vehicles on E1Camino Real and that there
ara-a substantial number of student pedestrians crossing E1 Camino Real
at Orange Street along with several traffic signal warrants being
satisfied, and that the spacing is more than 600 feet from the nearest
signalized intersection, the installation of a traffic signal is
justified at this time at the subject intersection.
Page 6
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY FOR THE INTERSECTION OF EL CAMINO
REAL AND ORANGE STREET
RECO NDATION:
It is recOmmended that the installation of a traffic signal at the
intersection of E1 Camino Real and Orange Street be programmed into the
City's Capital Improvement Program for construction in the near future.
AT'FAC S:
ECRORGTS.RPT
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SHEETS 1-11
DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC COUNT.SHEET
TRAFFIC COUNTS
9-6
1-19'~2 II
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
Traffic Manual
DIST~' CO RTE
Figure 9-1
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
C^LC ~"'~~/~
PM CHK /
DATE
DATE
Major St:
Minor St:
Cdtical speed of major street traffic >_ 40 mph
In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 pop.
i
WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume
Critical Approach Speed.
Critical Approach Speed
RURAL (R)
r"! URBAN (U)
mph
mph
100% SATISFIED YES 1-'i
I::10% :SAII$1;IEU YES I I
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS)
LANES I 2 or more
.... Both Apprch,. 500 350 600 420~
Major Street (400) ~_(21~ (480)
I
Minor Street (120) ;,__~) (160) (112) , .~..,;~.~ ;_,. ~,~
¢
Hour
WARRANT 2- Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES'.NO !--I
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
APPROACH I 2 or mom
~NES
~ior S~t. (~) (420) (720) (~4)
WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume
100% SATISFIED YES r"'l NO 1-'1
REQUIREMENT
Pedestrian volum6 crossing tho major street is 100 or more
for each of any four hours or is 190 or more during any one
hour; .AND
There are less than 60 gaps .Dor hour in the major street traf-
fic stream o! adequate length for pedestrians to cross; AND
The nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater
than 300 feet; AND
The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive
traffic flow on the major street.
FULFILLED
Yes ~ No i~
Yes ~ No '. l-'l
','e~ ~ ~o r-1
Yes
The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other
evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown.
Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7
i
Figure 9-2
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
WARRANTS 4 - School Crossings
Not Applicable .................................. r'lj
See School Crossings Warrant Sheet
WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES I~} NO ~.
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED
,,
~- 1000 FT. N ~.ft, S . ft, E Z~ ~. ft, W ~'~ .ft. YES [] NO []
ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY ~RAI-I-IC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT'
SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST
'~'~.'~/~"~1:1~-~i:~"~i~!~"~1~1~,~.~+'~;(~!'~ ~O NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND
SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM [] []
WARRANT 6 - Accident Experience SATISFIED YES I~ NO ~
REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ~ FULFILLED
ONE WARRANT
WARRANT I - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME
SATiFiED ................................................................................................
80% WARRANT 2- INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC YES []
SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW ~... !-'1
ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY ,~ [] .
ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR. & INVOLVING INJURY OR $500 DAMAGE
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
5OR MORE i~_.~.' ~ ~. '? ,/~.~./,._ ~ ~'~ L~'//,.j,,r,,~_'~ I~
WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant
MINIMUM VOLUME ENTERING VOLUMES-ALL APPROACHES I,~f'l
REQUIREMENTS
II
O~
DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS OF g. SAT./',ND/OR SUN. __ VEH/HR[ _
MINOR ST.
APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE ON AN OFFICAL PLAN ~ '"'
SATISFIED YES O
Cl..IARACTERIST!CS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST.
HWY SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH 'tRAFFIC ~
RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVERSING A Cf'Pr ~
FULFILLED
YES [] NO ~
ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTIC MET, BOTH SiS. YES E] NO ~
The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence
of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown.
9-10 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual
1-1991 '
Figure 9-5
SCHOOL PROTECTION WARRANTS
DIST. CO RTE PM
Major St: ,~'-/ C~,~ ~,~ /
Critical speed of'major street traffic > 40 mph
In built up area of isolated commun~ of < 10,000 pop.
CHK DATE
Cdtical Approach Speed '?C~'''f~ o ~
Critical .m~oproach Speed ~
or RURAL (R)
r"'l URBAN (U)
mph
mph
FLASHING YELLOW SCHOOL SIGNALS
(ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED)
SATISFIED YES r'-!
Minimum Requirements
PART A .... U R
E~mh of
Vehicle Volume 2 hours 200 140
Scho_.ol Age Pedestrian Each of 40 40
~rosslng Street 2 hours
AND
,,
PART B
SATISFIED YES' []
Critical Approach Speed Exceeds 35 mph SATISFIED YES
..... ___.~_N D ............
· ~.~._ -: _ .- ........ . _ _ - _
PART C
Is nearest controlled crossing more than 600 feet away?
NO i-3
NO I--I
F"] NO r'-]
SCHOOL AREA TRAFFIC SIGNALS
(ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED)
PART A
Min!mum
Vehicle Volume Each of
2 hours
School Age Pedestrian
Crossing Street
Each of
2 hours
or
Rc'~luiremen~.r~
PART B
AND
_
Is nearest controlled crossing more than 600 feet away?
SATISFIED
SATISFIED
SATISFIED
YES ~ NO E]
YES ~ NO r-')
YES ~/'~O r'-]
9-8
· 1 I
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
Figure 9-3
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
Traffic Manual
"1
WARRANT 8 - Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES r,'l NO
.
·
REQUIR EM ENT' WAR RANT ;~ FULFILLED
,
TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME
SATISFIED
80"/,, 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC YES E] NO r-']
WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* -Y~.S r--] NO
2 or ~ Hour
Approach' Lanes One more
' TI"' ,
Both Approaches - Major Street
Highest Approaches - Minor Street
* Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied.
WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES r"'l NO r-']
(ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) ~'~-/Z4; ,/~' "~
1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a ' /~,~
STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane a,bproach and five /,/,¢ ~ ~2.
vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES r-] NO r'"']
..)
2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for
one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes;
YES r"'l NO [~]
3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph
for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with
three approaches.
WARRAN, T 11 - Peak Hour Volume
Approach Lanes
Both Approaches Major Street
I Highest Approaches - Minor Street
YES 0 NO 0
2or . ,,t~'~, / /./ / .
one ,m~.re ~/ /,//~j/ ,,// Hour
Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied.
The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence
'he need for right-of-way assignment must be shown.
9-12 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual
1-1~1
'- Figure 9-7
· FOUR HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
(Rural Areas)
40~
~..~..-----2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR)
~0
~~ "~.,.~...- ~---- 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & I LANE (MINOR)
2()0 ~~._~ ~~ ~.. OR 1 LANE (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR)
LAN~-(~t=I~-&-I- -I~ANE.-{MINOR~ ~ ~ I~
200 300 400 SO0 600 700 800 900 1000
MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH ~,/~r~ ,f
* NOTE:
80 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET
APPROACH WI'IH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 69 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER
THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WiTH ONE LANE.
9-14
--
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
Figure 9-9
PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
(Rural Areas)
Traffic Manual
500
400
300
2O0
100
~ 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & I LANE (MINOR)
:~ OR 1 LANE (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR)
LANE (MAJOR) & I LANE (MINOR)-
! I !
300
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH
NOTE:
100 VPH APPLI£S AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VO[UiVIE FOR A MINOR.STREET
APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES ,e.S THE LOWER
THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE.
Traffic Manual
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND UGHTING
INSERT NORTH POINT
Figure 9-10
DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC COUNT SHEET
P
NO. OF LANES
PEDESTRIANS
TOTAL*
/7(~
-rOTAL'l~
~ AM PEAK PM PEAK
* ENTIRE COUNT PERIOD
)( )(
Not to Scale
TOTAL~
PEDESTRIANS
TOTAL * PEAK
NO. OF LANES
9-15
- 1-1991
DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC COUNT
DIST_ _ _ CO RTE PM
INTERSECTION GCVE NAME --
~~ ..........
_ _/'/ ~'~¢,'~ ~/~-~
CAY DATE
7- _~/~-,~ /z_ - ~
HOUR TO HOUR
TOTAL VOLUME
AM
PEAK
PM
HOUR VOLUME
HOUR VOLUME
TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES,INC.
PEDESTRIAN COUNT
N/S:
E/W:
ORANGE ST
EL CAMIN0 REAL
15 Min
Period
Beginning
E-LEG
W-LEG
DAY: MONDAY CITY: TUSTIN
DATE: 3/29/93 FILENAME: 03317002
N-LEG
MID-BLOCK
i CROSSINGS
S-LEG E-LEG W-LEG N-LEG S-LEG TOTAL
7:00
:15
:30
:45
~:00
:15
:30
:45
9:00
:15
:30
:45
1C:00
:15
:30
:45
11:00
:15
:30
:45
12:00
:15
:30
:45
i:00
:!5
:30
:45
2:00
:!5
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
NB SB NB
11
2O
46
47
2
0
2
3
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
1
SB EB WB
0 I 0 8 0
0 0 3 2 3
0 3 2 6 0
0 2 1 14 0
0 1 0 4 3
0 0 0 3 3
0 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1
0 0 0
I 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
3 1
1 1
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 11
0 1
EB WB NB SB NB SB EB WB EB WB
0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 21
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 3
I '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
1 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 5
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
:30
:~5
3:00
:!5
PM
PM
PM
P~
0 8 0 '2
0 10 0 4
3 158 0 3
0 12 0 3
5 6
2 12
0 39
0 12
:30
:
:15
:30
5:S0
:!5
:30
6:C0
:15
:30
PM
P~
PM
PM
1 4 0 5
1 5 0 2
0 3 O 0
0 3 I 0
I 0 3 0
0 0 0 0
0 I 0
0 0 0 0
0 O 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 I 0 0
I 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 23
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 33
2 I 0 0 0 1 0 8 215
0 0 0 Q 0 ,O 0 2 29
0 1 0 5 0 0 2 0 19
0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 19
0 0 e 0 0 O 2 0 11
0 2 0 2 o 0 0 0 8
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
0 0 0 3 I G I 0 8
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
CC"HENTS: S-LEG IS A DRIVEWAY
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET:
DATE: 3/29/93
ORANGE E/W STREET: EL CAMINO
ST REAL
DAY: MONDAY
CITY: TUSTIN
FILENAME: 0331701A
15 Min
Period
Beginning
LANES: 0 1 0 0
6:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
7:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
Northbound Southbound Eastbound
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET
0 1 I 12
0 0 0 18
0 0 0 11
0 0 0 11
Westbound
ER WL WT WR TOTAL
1 0 0 2 0 1 2 0
0 11 8 56 I 0 107 10 207
0 6 7- 69 0 0 120 9 229
0 16 20. 108 2 I 164 27 349
0 13 28 114 1 1 167 36 371
8: O0 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
9:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM'
45 AM
10:00 AM
15 AM
30 A.~
45 AH
0 0 I 4
2 0 0 8
0 0 I 5
2 0 0 9
0 9 8 58 2 I 136 7 226
0 9 5 53 3 0 145 4 229
0 7 2 43 I I 124 5 189
0 5 I 44 0 0 111 5 177
AM Peak Hr
Begins at
?3O
VOLUMES : 1
0 I 39 0 46 62 341
7 3 600 77 ].177
COMMENTS: S-LEG : DRIVEWAY
Traffic Data Services. Inc.
TABULAR SUHMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEHENTS
N/S STREET: ORANGE E/W STREET: EL CAMINO CITY: TUSTIN
ST REAL
DATE: 3/29/93
DAY: HONDAY
FILENAME: 0331701N
15 Htn Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Period
Beginning NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: O. I 0 0 1 0 0 Z 0 1 2 0
11:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
12:00 NOON 4
15 PM 1
30 PM 0
45 PM 0
I: O0 PM 0
15 PM 0
3O PM 0
45 PM 0
2:0'0 PM 1
15 PM 0
45 PM 0
3:00 PM 0
15 PM 1
3O PM 1
45 PM 0
0 0 2 0 5 2 80 I 0 114 3 211
0 0 8 0 6 4 81 0 0 116 7 223
0 I I 0 6 3 94 2 0 117 13 237
0 I 7 0 3 5 98 I i 108 12 236
0 2 5 0 3 1 99 0 0 78 4 192
0 O. 7 0 5 2 81 0 0 73 2 170
0 0 6 0 5 2 68 0 0 80 5 166
o
0 0 4 0 13 9 79 2 2 71 5 185
0 0 7 0 8 3 70 I I 104 18 213
0 1 8 0 11 3 65 1 I 78 6 174
0 0 13 0 5 I 82 0 0 79 1 181
0 0 10 0 9 21 96 0 0 112 14 262
0 1 10 0 19 10 83 2 1 120 22 268
0 I 7 0 7 4 76 0 0 11Q ~7 223
0 2 7 0 10 5 80 I 0 111 6 223
0 0 9 0 8 3 81 0 2 123 5 231
AM Peak Hr
Begins at
1445
VOLUMES =
0 4 34 0 45 40 335 3 I a53 59 976
COMMENTS: S-LEG : DRIVEWAY
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET: ORANGE E/W STREET: EL CAMINO CITY: TUSTIN
ST REAL
DATE: 3/29/93 OAY: MONDAY FILENAME: 0331701P
15 Mtn Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Period
Beginning NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: O. i 0 0 I 0 0 2 0 I 2 0
2:00 PM
15 PM
3O PM
45 PM
3:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
4:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
5:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
6:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
1 0 0 9 0 7 4 110 0 I 104 9 245
0 0 1 4 0 10 4 108 I 0 151 10 289
I 0 2 I 0 4 7 110 2 0 130 4 261
0 0 0 7 0 14 9 120 0 i 144 9 304
0 0 0 4 0 9 3 113 1 1 127 8 266
4 0 0 7 0 9 4 104 0 0 163 6 297
2 0 0 10 0 6 5 115 2 0 168 9 317
0 0 0 11 0 12 4 108 0 0 135 5 275
0 0 1 5 0 5 5 109 0 0 86 3 214
2 1 1 7 0 4 4 106 1 0 78 8 212
0 0 0 3 0 9 I 83 0 0 77 2 175
I 0 1 6 0 4 6 69 1 1 76 6 171
PM Peak Hr
Begins at
VOLUMES =
6 0 0 28 0 38 21 452 3 2 602 32 1184
-COMMENTS: S-LEG : DRIVEWAY
TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. - LOCATION CODE 03317.002
LOCATION - ORANGEST-N/O EL CAMINO REAL
AVERAGED VOLL~S FOR - MONDAY 3129/93 TO TUESDAY 3/30/93
TIME NB SB TOTAL TIME NB SB TOTAL
12:00 - 12:15 0 0 0 12:00 - 12:15 3 10 13
12:15 - 12:30 0 0 0 12:15 - 12:30 9 14 23
12:30 - 12:45 0 0 0 12:30 - 12:45 17 10 ~ 27
12:45 - 1:00 0 0 1 1 I I 12:45 - 1:00 14 43 12 46~..~ 26 89
1:00 - 1:15 2 I 3 1:00 - 1:15 i 14 15
1:15 - 1:30 I 0 I 1:15 - 1:30 3 .15 18
1:30 - 1:45 I 0 I 1:30 - 1:45 8 9 17
1:45 - 2:00 2 6 0 I 2 7 1:45 - 2:00 16 28 22 60 [~
2:00 - 2:15 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:15 19 12 31
2:15 - 2:30 0 0 0 2:15 - 2:30 11 18 29
2:30 - 2:45 0 0 0 2:30 - 2:45 8 21 ~ 29
2:45 - 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 - 3:00 29 67 15 66 ~ 44 133
3:00 - 3:15 I 0 I 3:00 - 3:15 42 27 69
3:15 - 3:30 0 0 0 3:15 - 3:30 20 19 39
3:30 - 3:45 0 1 i 3:30 - 3:45 11 18 29
3:45- 4:00 I 2 I 2 2 4 3:45- 4:00 8 81 19 63 (~27 164
4:00 - 4:15 I I 2 4:00 - 4:15 14 15 29
4:15 - 4:30 0 3 3 4:15 - 4:30 12 12 24
4:30 - 4:45 0 I I 4:30 - 4:45 10 7 17
'
4:45 - 5:00 0 1 0 5 0 6 4:45 - 5:00 17 53 18 ~ 35 105 '
5:00 - 5:15 0 2 2 5:00 - 5:15 9 12 21
5:15 - 5:30 0 2 2 5:15 - 5:30 10 16 26
5:30 - 5:45 1 2 3 5:30 - 5:45 13 16 29
5:45 - 6:00 I 2 7 13 8 15 5:45 - 6:00 6 38 25 69~) 31 107
6:00 - 6:15 1 3 4 6:00 - 6:15 9 10 19
6:15 - 6:30 5 9 14 6:15 - 6:30 12 11 23
6:30 - 6:45 8 15 23 6:30 - 6:45 3 14 17
6:45 - 7:00 16 30 22 49 38 79 6:45 - 7:00 13 37 9. 4~ 22 81
7:00 - 7:15 15 22 37 7:00 - 7:15 7 11 18
7:15 - 7:30 17 24 41 7:15 - 7:30 5 7 12
7:30 - 7:45 42 28 70 Fi',, 7:30 - 7:45 3 8 11
7:45 - 8:00 64 138 23 97 ~) 87 235)[~ 7:45 - 8:00 9 24 7 33 16 57
8£00 - 8:15 13 12 25 8:00 - 8:15 6 7 13
8:15 - 8:30 8 15 23 8:15 - 8:30 5 7 12
8:30 - 8:45 6 13 19 8:30 - 8:45 5 5 10
8:45 - k 9:00 5 32 15 55,'~ 20 87 8:45 - 9:00 4 20 5 2z 9
9:00 - 9:15 2 11 13 9:00 - 9:15 4 11 15
9:15 - 9:?_,0 6 14 20 9:15 - 9:30 3 5 8
9:30 - 9:45 6 7 13 9:30 - 9:45 2 4 6
9:45 - 10:00 .1 15 10 42 11 57 9:45 o 10:00 7 16 6 26 13
44
42
10:00 - 10:15 2 4 6 10:00 - 10:15 5 I 6
10:15 - 10:30 7 10 17 10:15 - 10:30 2 5 7
10:30 - 10:45 1 13 14 10:30 - 10:45 3 0 3
10:45 - 11:00 6 16 8 35 14 51 10:45 - 11:00 1 11 4 1C 5
21
11:00 - 11:15 4 9 13 11:00 - 11:15 3 4
:1:15 - 11:30 4 12 16 11:15 - 11:30 3 3 6
11:30 - 11:45 3 18 21 11:30 - 11:45 4 3 7
11:45 - 12:00 2 13 12 "51 ... 14 64 11:45 - 12:00 I 11 0 1C I 21
TOTALS 255 351 606 429 523 952
ADT'S 684 87~ 1,558
· :' "' TR~FIC DATA SERVICES, INC. LOCATION CODE 10205.019
LOCATION - EL CAHINO RL-BTN RF.J) HL/NEWPRT
AVERAGED V(N.IJ~ FOR - TIJURSDAY 11/19/92 TO FRIDAY 11/20/92
.. TitlE EB Wi) TOTAL TIldE EB WI) TOTAL
12:00 - 12:15 7 12 19 12:00 - 12:15 82 105 187
12:15 - 12:30 2 9 11 12:15 - 12:30 131 94 225
12:30 - 1Z:45 3 5 8 12:30 - 12:45 70 104 174
12:45 - 1:00 6 18 5 31 11 49 12:45 - 1:00 96 379 109 412 205 791
87 174
..
82 157
89 171
334 102 360 192 694
2:00- 2:15 83 92 175
2:15- 2:30 87 97 184
2:30- 2:45 96 120 216
2:45- 3:00 120 386 139 448 259 834
3:00- 3:15 123 117 240
3:15- 3:30 99 114 213
3:30- 3:45 90 106 196
3:45- 4:00 93 405 137 474 230 879
4:00- 4:15 84 166 250
4:15- 4:30 110 154 264
4:30- 4:45 87 142 229
4:45- 5:00 98 379 153 615 251 994
5:00 - 5:15 113 150 263
5:15- 5:30 91 167 258
5:30- 5:45 133 177 310
5:45 - 6:00 112 449 189 683 301 1132
6:00- 6:15 111 170 281
6:15- 6:30 99 143 242
6:30- 6:45 88 110 198
6:45- 7:00 77 375 106 529 183 904
7:00- 7:15 63 67 130
7:15- 7:30 58 78 136
7:30- 7:45 71 53 124
7:45 - 8:00 47 239 47 245 94 484
1:00 - 1:15 8 1 9 1:00 - 1:15 87
1:15 - 1:30 6 6 12 1:15 - 1:30 75
1:30 - 1:45 3 4 7 1:30 - 1:45 82
1:45 - 2:00 9 26 11 22 20 48 1:45 - 2:00 90
2:00 - 2:15 I 0 1
2:15 - 2:30 3 2 5
2:30 - 2:45 3 3 6
2:45 - 3:00 3 10 2 7 5 17
3:00 - 3:15 0 4 4
3:15 - 3:30 0 0 0
3:30 - 3:45 I 6 7
3:45 - 4:00 4 5 I 11 5 16
4:00 - 4:15 I I 2
4:15 - 4:30 2 I 3
4:30 - 4:45 6 6 12
4:45 - 5:00 5 14 I 9 6 23
5:00 - 5:15 6 3 .9
5:15 - 5:30 7 8 15
5:30 - 5:45 12 15 27
5:45 - 6:00 27 52 31 57 58 109
6:00 - 6:15 24 26 50
6:15 - 6:30 24 41 65
6:30 - 6:45 29 51 80
6:45 - 7:00 42 119 78 196 120 315
7:00 - 7:15 50 106 156
7:15 - 7:30 70 114 184
7:30 - 7:45 93 193 286
7:45 - 8:00 93 306 305 718 398
1024
8:00- 8:15 73 144 217 8:00- 8:15 48 46 94
8:15'- 8:30 47 149 196 8:15- 8:30 55 32 87
8:30 - 8:45 56 106 - 162 8:30 - 8:45 46 42 88
8:45 - 9:00 30 206 115 514 145 720 ~,-~ 8:45 - 9:00 45 194 42 162 87 356
~ 7Z~ ' "?
9:00- 9:15 41 104 145 9:00- 9:15 43 40
9:15 - 9:30 45 98 1"3 9:15 - 9:30 49 29
9:30- 9:45 38 77 1i5 9:30- ~:45 47 43
9:45 - 10:00 51 175 82 361 133 536 9:45 - 10:00 35 174 32
144
83
78
99
67 318
10:00 - 10:15 57 68 125 10:90 - 10:15 19 22 41
10:15 - 10:30 45 71 116 10:15 - 10:30 21 19 40
10:30 - 10:45 61 72 133 10:30 - 10:45 22 14 36
10:45 - 11:00 75 238 84 295 159 533 10:45 - 11:00 27 89 11 66 38
155
11:00 - 11:15 65 81 146 11:00 - 11:15 18 14 32
11:15 - 11:30 81 94 175 11:15 - 11:30 16 14 30
11:30 - 11:45 64 91 155 11:30 - 11:45 15 13 28
11:45 - 12:00 87 297 116 382 203 '679 11:45 - 12:00 10 59 10 51 20 110
TOTALS 1,466 2,603 4,069 3,462 4,189 7,651
ADT'S 4,928 6,792 11,720