Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 01-17-94ACTION AGENDA kEPOKTS ~.: i 1/17/94 TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 10, 1994 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CALL: PUBLIC CONCERNS: Present: Weil, Baker, Butler, Kasalek and Stracker Absent: None (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda.) At this time members of the public may address the Commission regarding any items not on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission (NO action can be taken off-agenda items unless authorized by law). IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY MATTER, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE SO THAT YOUR REMARKS ON THE TAPE RECORDING OF THE MEETING CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO YOU. WHEN YOU START TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 1. Minutes of the December 13, 1993 Planninq Commission meetinq. Baker moved, Butler seconded to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS: IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM CONSIDERED AT A PUBLIC HEARING IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO Planning Commission Action Agenda January 10, 1994 Page 2 RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEO>~ ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED iN THIS AGENDA, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING. 2. Conditional Use P~rmit 93-018 APPLICANT/ OWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: ROLLO S. PICKFORD, PASTOR RED HILL LUTHERAN CHURCH 13200 RED HILL AVENUE TUSTIN, CA 92680 13200 RED HILL AVENUE PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL (P & I) THIS PROJECT. HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 11), PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 15311 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. TO AUTHORIZE A NEW MONUMENT SIGN AND MODIFY THE PARKING LOT AREAS OF THE RED HILL LUTHER3LN C~JRCH FACILITY Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 93-018 by adopting Resolution No. 3225, as submitted or revised. Presentation: Becky Stone, Assistant Planner Commissioner Butler moved, Baker seconded to approve Conditional Use Permit 93-018 by adopting Resolution No. 3225 revised as follows: Opening paragraph, after "A NEW MONUMENT SIGN," insert "OR THE RELOCATION OF THE EXISTING MONI3MENT SIGN," I.A. after "a new monument sign" insert "or to relocate the existing monument sign," Exhibit A, Page 2, Insert new items 2.3 through 2.6 to read as follows: "(4) 2.3 Submit for plan check complete plans for the monument sign including the following: Planning Commission Action Agenda January 10, 1994 Pace 3 a · An elevation of the sign showing the dimensions of the sign, the dimensions of the sign's supporting members, the maximum and minimum height of the sign above existing or proposed grade level, sign copy, proposed lettering and background color. b · A dimensioned site plan showing the proposed location of the sign in relation to the boundaries of the lot upon which it is to be situated. A sign plan indicating the scope and structureal detail of the work to be done, including details of all electrical and mechanical connections, supports and footing and materials to be used. (4) 2.4 In the event that the existing monument sign is relocated to the proposed ~new monument sign location near the northerly driveway, the existing monument sign shall be reconstructed to meet the 1991 Uniform Building Code requirements, and all requirements of the Tustin Sign Code. Should the existing monument sign materials, including the base or sign can, be damaged or worn, such materials shall be replaced or repaired subject to the approval of the Community Development. (4) 2.5' Submit at plan check complete detailed landscaping and irrigation plans for all landscaping areas consistent with adopted City of Tustin Landscaping and Irrigation Submittal Requirements. Provide summary table applying indexing identification to plant material in their actual location. The plan and table must list botanical and common names, sizes, spacing, actual location and quantity of the plant materials proposed. Show planting and berming details, soil preparation, staking, etc. The irrigation plan shall show location and control of backflow prevention devices, pipe size, sprinkler type, spacing and coverage. Details for all equipment must be provided. Show all property lines on the landscaping and irrigation plan, public right-of-ways area, sidewalk widths, parkway areas, and wall locations. The Department of Community Development may request minor substitutions of plant materials during plan check. Note on landscaping plan that coverage of landscaping irrigation materials is subject to field inspection at project completion by the Department of Community Development. Planning Commission Action Agenda January 10, 1994 Page 4 (4) 2.6 Landscaping materials shall be provided on the westerly elevation of the trash enclosure to adequately screen the trash enclosure wall from the public right-of-way, subject to the Director of the Community Development Department's approval." o Conditional Use Permit 93-007, Design Review 93-003 and Use Determination 93-006 APPLICANT/ OWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES 17521 ORANGE TREE LANE TUSTIN, CA 92680 LOT 20, C AND D OF TRACT 13627 PLANNED COMMUNITY - EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY FACILITY WITH UNDERLYING MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL THIS PROJECT IS COVERED BY A PREVIOUS EIR (85-2) ~ FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN. NO ADDITIONAL · DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED. REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT A CHURCH FACILITY, MINISTER'S LIVING QUARTERS AND RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission: 1. Approve the Environmental Determination for the project by adopting Resolution No. 3220. 2. Approve Conditional Use Permit 93-007 and Design Review 93-003 by adopting Resolution No. 3221, as submitted or revised. Presentation: Becky Stone, Assistant Planner Commissioner Baker moved, Kasalek seconded to approve the Environmental Determination for the project by adopting Resolution No. 3220. Motion carried 5-0. Commissioner Baker moved, Kasalek seconded to approve Conditional Use Permit 93-007 and Design Review 93-003 by adopting Resolution No. 3221, revised as follows: Exhibit A - Initial Study, Page 12, Item 13, changed occurrences of "Patriot Way" to "Pioneer Way". Planning Commission Action Agenda January 10, 1994 Page 5 Motion carried 5-0. OLD BUSINESS: o City of Tustin General Plan Revision and Final Program Environmental Impact Report APPLICANT: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: CITY OF TUSTIN 300 CENTENNIAL WAY TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92~80 DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRO .... mNTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 92101104) -REVIEW PEA~OD CLOSED Recommendation - It is recommended 5han the Planning Commission: 1. Recommend that the City Ccuncil certify Final Program Environmental Impact Report 94-01. 2. Recommend approval to the City Council of General Plan Amendmen% S4-0!, updating all elements of the Tustin Area General Plan with incorporation of the Errata to General Plan documents. ~Presentation: Rita Westfield, Assis5ann Director Commissioner Butler moved, Stracker seconded to recommend that the City Council certify Final Program Environmental Impact Report 94- 01 revi~ed as follows: Exhibit A, Page A-12, ENERGY/UTILITIES, delete first paragraph and add the following: "Si.qnificant Effects - Implementation of the General Plan will cause increases in the demand for electricity and natural gas. Electrical use will increase by approximately nine percent in the incorporated City of Tustin and 11 percent in the Planning Area. Natural gas uses will increase by 27 percent in the Planning Area and six percent in the unincorporated County area. Water service infrastructure must be extended into presently vacant acres before they are developed.~'' Buildout of the General Plan will increase daily water consumption by 27 percenu in the Planning Area and two percent in the unincorporated area." Motion carried 5-0. Commissioner Baker moved, Stracker seconded to recommend approval to the City Council of General Plan Amendment 94-01, updating all Planning Commission Action Agenda January 10, 1994 Page 6 elements of the Tustin Area General Plan with incorporation of the Errata to General Plan documents. Motion carried 5-0. NEW BUSINESS: STAFF CONCERNS: 5. Report on actions taken at January 3, 1994 City Council meetinq Staff reported on the subject agenda. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Commissioner Butler -Inquired about funding of the new cameras for the police department vehicles. ~ Staff replied that the funding was coming from asset · forfeiture funds. -Inquired about the request to waive business license fees for the Farmers Market vendors. Staff informed the Commission that the City Council would be reviewing the issue. -Noted that he was glad that the General Plan was completed. Commissioner Baker -Thanked staff for the recent informative memos forwarded to the Commission. Commissioner Stracker -Wished everyone a Happy New Year. Commissioner Kasalek -Inquired about the condition for the Black Angus parking; wasn't there a condition for one-way driving? Planning Commzssion Action Agenda Janua~:' 10, 1794 Page 7 Olaf= ~ ~ nc~ed that there was but that there were different t~ming tkresholds identifying when certain items needed to be csmpieted. Staff will do an informational memo on the ~kresholds. -ihanked Kathy Beal, Code Enforcement Officer, for her follow- u~ memos on code enforcement complaints. -iomplained about the poor quality of cable coverage on the Cz~y Council meetings. Slaff wi-i pass this issue on to the Public Works Department. Commissioner Wei! -lnquired about a senate bill reference in letter to the editor from Carol Bone. S5aff nc-ed that they have reviewed the bill and have ~--erpre~ed di= .... ~ferently. Staff will keep the Commission informed ~= ~ any changes and provide all Commissioners with a c~py of nhe bill. -Znquired about Commission Stracker speaking before the City CsuDcil as a "Commissioner" and not "a resident" S2aff ncned that a Commissioner could speak as a private c~-:zen and also identify that they..were a Planning Ccmmissicner. However, to represent the COmmission, they need csncurrence of the Commission. -Wished Lois Bobak, Deputy City Attorney, a happy birthday. A/) JOURA.~LENT: Conunissioner Baker moved, Stracker seconded to adjourn the meeting at 8:35 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. The nezn regular meeting of the Planning Commission is on January 24, I~4 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at 300 Centennial Way, ?ustin. -