The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06 TLLD ANN'L ASSESS'S 04-21-03AGENDA REPORT Agenda Item Reviewed: City Manager ~'~ Finance Director __~ MEETING DATE: APRIL 21, 2003 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: I WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2003-04 FISCAL YEAR SUMMARY The City Council, at their meeting of February 18, 2003 adopted Resolution No. 03-08, which ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Levy of Annual Assessments for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District. The Engineer's Report has now been completed and consideration of the following actions are now appropriate: Adoption of Resolution No. 03-55 approves the Engineer's Report for the Fiscal Year 2003-04. Adoption of Resolution No. 03-56 declares the City Council's intention to levy assessments for Fiscal Year 2003-04 and sets a public hearing for May 19, 2003. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolutions: 1. Resolution No. 03-55 approving the Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2003-04; and 2. Resolution No. 03-56 declaring its intention to levy assessments for Fiscal Year 2003-04 and setting a public hearing for May 19, 2003. FISCAL IMPACT The landscape maintenance and public street lighting expenses within the Tustin Ranch area will be recovered through the levy of the annual assessments for the District. The City's proposed assessment on parkland within the District is $7,011.85 and will be paid through the City's FY 2003~04 property tax expense fund. BACKGROUND The District was formed on July 15, 1985 to install and maintain certain street lighting and landscaping in the area generally bounded by Browning Avenue, Irvine Boulevard, Jamboree Road (formerly Myford Road) and the I-5 Freeway within the City of Tustin. Assessments for the benefiting property were confirmed for the first fiscal year, 1985-86, and each fiscal year thereafter. As property developed in the Tustin Ranch area, such development was required to annex to the District. Tustin Landscape and Lighting District Levy of Annual Assessment for the 2003-04 Fiscal Year April 21,2003 Page 2 As a result of new procedures required by the passage of Proposition 218 on the November 1996 Statewide ballot, which added Article XIIID to the State Constitution, the City re-analyzed the District regarding the special benefits associated with the improvements for each property in the District, commencing with the 1997-98 Fiscal Year. Notices and ballots to approve the assessment including future adjustments based on increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) were mailed in the spring of 1997 to all property owners in the District. Subsequently, at the conclusion of a public hearing on July 7, 1997, the majority of returned ballots, weighted by assessed amount, approved the annual assessments. Based on the result of the ballot proceedings, the base assessment rate for Fiscal Year 1997-98 may be increased in subsequent years by no more than the increase in the CPI for all urban consumers for the Los Angeles, Anaheim and Riverside area. The percentage increase in the CPI for calendar year 2002 is 3.7%. The District's budget for Fiscal Year 2003-04 is slightly lower than last years budget due to anticipated reductions in street lighting charges received from Southern California Edison, the City's electrical service provider. However, the assessment rates have been increased per the maximum allowed by Proposition 218 in order to maintain a reserve fund at 34% of the budget. The reserves have been used in the past to offset increases in electrical costs and to replace diseased landscaping. Each year the City estimates the cost to provide the street lighting and landscape maintenance services in the Tustin Ranch area. This total cost is divided among the parcels on a proportionate share, based on a report prepared by consultant engineers. The precise method used to establish each parcel's special benefit may vary according to land usage and benefit area, but similar parcels with equal benefit from the District pay equal assessments. There are approximately 5682 parcels within the District as compared to 5662 parcels for FY 2002- 03. The District includes three separate benefit areas based upon the special benefits received. Properties located in Benefit Area A pay only for arterial and collector lighting. Properties located in Benefit Area B pay for arterial and collector street lighting as well as parkway, slope, and trail landscaping. Properties are located in Benefit Area C if they have the previously mentioned benefits along with local residential street lighting. Those parcels that pay for local residential street lighting are located within the residential tracts that have public streets. Typically, owners of single-family residential parcels in each area pay an equal share. The proposed assessments to be paid by single-family residential parcels in each of the following benefit areas are: Arterial & Collector Street Lighting (ACLT) .................................................... $ 9.23 per year ACLT + Parkway Slope & Trail Landscaping (PSTL) .................................... $58.81 per year ACLT & PSTL + Local Residential Lighting (LRLT) ........................................ $81.67 per year The total costs to be assessed for lighting and landscape maintenance for Fiscal Year 2003-04 are $87,610.00 and $380,484.00, respectively, for a total operating and maintenance assessment of $468,094.00. Tustin Landscape and Lighting District Levy of Annual Assessment for the 2003-04 Fiscal Year April 21, 2003 Page 3 The Engineer's Report prepared by Harris & Associates has been filed with the City Clerk and contains the following proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2003-04 along with a comparable listing to last year assessment. ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY BY LAND USE FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 BENEFIT AREA A LAND USE ACLT Single-Family Res (S/Dwelling Unit) B C A B C ACLT + ACLT + ACLT ACLT + ACLT + PSTL PSTL + PSTL PSTL + LRLT LRLT $56.71/DU $78.76/DU $58.81/DU $81.67/DU Multi-Family Res (S/Dwelling Unit) Non-Residential (S/ac) $42.53/DU $44.11/DU $340.26/ac $352.86/ac Non-Res. Tustin Market PI. (S/ac) $53.40/ac Golf Course (S/ac) Vacant and Parks (S/ac) $55.38/ac $226.84/ac $235.24/ac $113.42/ac $117.62/ac CONCLUSION The two attached resolutions require adoption by the City Council at the April 21, 2003 meeting. These resolutions provide for the following: · Resolution No. 03-55 approves the Engineer's Report for the 2003-2004 Fiscal Year for the levy of annual assessment for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District. Resolution No. 03-56 declares the City Council's intention to provide for an annual levy of assessment for said Landscape and Lighting District to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Resolution No. 03-56 also sets the date, time, and place for a public hearing concerning the annual levy of assessment for the District. The hearing is scheduled for Monday, May 19, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. Director of Public Works/City Engineer TDS:DRA:ccg:TL&L Dist Levy 03-04 Reso 03-55 & 03-56.doc Attachments: Resolution No. 03-55 and No. 03-56 -~'/~ I~ana I~. Kasdan Engineering Services Manager Engineer's Report for Tustin Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 RESOLUTION NO. 03-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 03-08, the City Council initiated proceedings for the 2003-2004 Fiscal Year for the levy of annual assessments and ordered the Engineer to prepare a report in accordance with Section 22565 of the State of California Streets and Highways Code and Proposition 218; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Engineer has filed the report with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has submitted the report to the City Council and the City Council now has reviewed and examined the report as so submitted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Tustin that it determines and orders as follows: Section 1. That the report entitled "Engineer's Report for Tustin Landscape and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2003-04" prepared by the Engineer, Harris & Associates, dated April 14, 2003, including description of improvement, estimated costs and diagram, as filed with the City Clerk, is hereby approved. Section 2. A copy of this report shall remain on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 21 st day of April 2003. ATTEST: Tracy Wills Worley, Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION 03-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR AN ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING FACILITIES IN THE TUSTIN RANCH AREA WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND PROPOSITION 218 AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution No. 03-08 initiated proceedings for the annual levy of assessments for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code) as amended and Proposition 218; and WHEREAS, by said Resolution No. 03-08, the City Council ordered the City Engineer to prepare a report pursuant to Section 22565 of said Code and Proposition 218; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer did prepare and file such a report and it was approved by the City Council on the 21st day of April 2003, with the passage and adoption of Resolution 03-55. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Tustin that it determines and orders as follows: Section 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Tustin to order the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 and to levy and collect said assessments pursuant to the provision of said Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of said Streets and Highways Code) as amended and Proposition 218. Section2: That the improvements to be undertaken consist of the installation, maintenance, servicing and operations of those certain public landscaping and lighting facilities located within the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District. The Assessment District designed as Tustin Landscape and Lighting District generally encompasses the portion of the City known as East Tustin, being north of I-5 Freeway and east of Browning Avenue except the areas of all public streets, avenues, lanes, alleys, and rights-of-way provided, however, notwithstanding property owned by the railroad and public utility companies not used for public purposes shall be included in the district and not be excluded pursuant to the aforesaid exceptions. Resolution 03-56 April 21,2003 Page 2 Section 3: That reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection for a fully detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and any areas therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. Section 4: That said proposed maintenance, servicing and operation of landscaping and lighting, in the opinion of the City Council of the City of Tustin will be to the benefit of the property lying within the described boundaries of the Assessment District as said Assessment District is described and defined in said Engineer's Report. Section 5: Notice is hereby given that Monday, May 19, 2003, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. at the Tustin City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California 92780 is hereby fixed as the time and place where all interested persons may appear before the City Council and be heard concerning the annual levy of assessments of the District, and extent of the District, the services to be performed, and the proposed assessment and all other matters relating thereto. Protests must be in writing and must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing. Any such protest shall state all grounds of the objection and, if filed by the property owner, shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property. Section 6: The City Clerk shall cause notice of the hearing to be given by causing the Resolution of Intention to be posted and published in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 21st day of April 2003. Tracy Wills Worley, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TUST[N LANDSCAPE AND LI'GI-IT]:NG D1'STRI'CT F~sca[ Year 2003 - 04 C['I'Y OF TUS'I']:N ORANGE COUNTY, CAL]:FORN]:A Prepared by: Harr(s & Assodates Apri[ 14, 2003 City of Tustin - Landscape and Ughting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apri[ 14, 2003 Page 1 ENGI'NEER'S REPORT Tus'r~N LANDSCAPE AND LIGH'i'~NG DISTRICT The undersigned respectfully submit the enclosed report as directed by .the City Council. undersigned certifies that he or she is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California. DATED: April 14, 2003 Harris & Associates ~B~Y: Joan E. Cox, P.E. R.C.E. No. 41965 The I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed in the office of the City Clerk on the ~ day of ,2003. City of Tustin Orange County, California , City Clerk, By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, on the __ day of ,2003. City of Tustin Orange County, Califomia , City Clerk, By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Assessment Ro'll was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Orange, on the __ day of ., 2003. City of Tustin Orange County, Califomia , City Clerk, By q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc ~'~1 Harr{s & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report April 14, 2003 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Submittal and Acknowledgments ................................................................................. 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 Report ........................................................................................................................... 4 Part A - Plans and Specifications ............................................................................ 6 Part B - Estimate of Cost ........................................................................................ 9 Part C - Assessment Roll ...................................................................................... 10 Part D - Method of Apportionment of Assessment .............................................. 11 Part E - Property Owner List ................................................................................ 19 Part F - Assessment Diagram ................................................................................ 19 Appendix Budget Detail / Maximum Assessment Rate Calculations Budget & Assessment Comparison Assessment Changes from the Previous Year Government Parcels Landscape Maintenance Facilities Map Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map Land Use Map Preliminary Assessment Roll (under separate cover) q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc !~II Harrfs & Associates I City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apri[ 14, 2003 Page 3 INTRODUCTION HISTORY The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the engineering analysis to levy the assessments in the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District for the 2003-04 fiscal year. The District was formed on July 15, 1985 to install and maintain certain street lighting and landscaping in the area bounded by Browning Avenue, Irvine Boulevard, Jamboree Road (formerly Myford Road) and the I-5 Freeway within the City of Tustin. Assessments for the benefiting property were confirmed for the first fiscal year, 1985-86, and each fiscal year thereafter. As property developed in the Tustin Ranch area, such development was required to annex to the District. The current boundary is shown on the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map, which is included in the Appendix. As a result of the new procedures required by Proposition 218 (Prop. 218), which was approved on the November 1996 Statewide ballot and added Article XIIID to the State Constitution, the City re-analyzed the District regarding the special benefits associated with the improvements for each property in the District, for the 1997-98 fiscal year. Notices and ballots to approve the Assessment, including a Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustment, were mailed to all property owners in the District, and a majority of the returned Assessment ballots approved the Assessment, including potential adjustments for increases in the CPI in future years. -- IMPROVEMENTS The District improvements consist solely of parkway landscaping, trail landscaping, slope landscaping, arterial and collector street lighting, and local residential street lighting in public rights- of-way and dedicated easements. The District does not install or maintain parks or median islands in roadways. SCOPE OF REPORT This report covers the levy of annual assessments for the 2003-04 fiscal year. The base assessment rate which may be levied for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) may be increased by the CPI for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside Area in any calendar year. The intent of applying the annual CPI adjustment to the base assessment rate is to maintain the value of the maintenance work, in relation to the increased cost of the maintenance. Therefore, the rates applied in FY 1997-98 are equal to the maximum rates today, when you consider the increased cost of living. In 1997, property owners within the District were noticed for and they approved, by assessment ballot proceeding, potential adjustments in the rates based on the annual CPI. The CPI for Calendar Year 2002 (December 2001 to December 2002) is 3.7%. Since the notice to property owners in 1997 included a potential CPI adjustment each subsequent year, and the property owners approved the potential range of rates, it is not necessary to hold an assessment ballot proceeding any year in which such an adjustment is made. For the calculation of the maximum assessment for each Fiscal Year, please refer to the Appendix. q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc · l(I Harris & Associates I City of Tusfin - Landscape and Lighting Oistrict, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Aprit !4, 2003 Page 4 CITY OF TUSTIN FISCAL YEAR 2003-04 ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND ARTICLE XIIID OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the 1972 Act), Article XIIID of the California Constitution and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for: TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District" or "District", I, Joan E. Cox, P.E., the authorized representative of Hams & Associates, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of six (6) parts as follows: PART A PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, are on file in the Office of the City Engineer and are incorporated herein by reference. PART B ESTIMATE OF COST An estimate of the costs of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. PART C ASSESSMENT ROLL An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. q:\tustin\fyO3-O4Xreports\llmdO304.doc IlHarr{s & Associates City of Tusfin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apdt 14, 2003 Page 5 PART D METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The method of apportionment of assessments indicates the proposed assessment of the net amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements to be assessed upon the several lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by such lots and parcels. PART E PROPERTY OWNER LIST A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this Assessment District, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Orange, is keyed to the records of the Assessor of the County of Orange which are incorporated herein by reference. PART F ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any benefit areas within the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District is on file in the Office of the City Engineer and is incorporated herein by reference. The lines a~d dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange for the fiscal year to which this Report applies. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. q:\tustin\fyO3-O4~reports\llmdO304.doc Harr{s & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apri[ 14, 2003 Page 6 PART A PLANS AND SPECI'FICA'rIONS The facilities, which have been constructed within the City of Tustin, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be serviced and maintained as generally described as follows: DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CITY OF TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2003-04 The existing facilities to be maintained and serviced include street lighting and arterial landscaping as described herein. · LIGHTING The street lighting system in the District consists of 760 lights. A summary by type and size follows: No. Size of Lumens 375 16,000 11 9,500 374 5,800 Type of Light High Pressure Sodium Vapor High Pressure Sodium Vapor High Pressure Sodium Vapor _ The area is built-out; therefore no additional street lights are anticipated. · LANDSCAPING The arterial landscaping includes parkway, slope and trail landscaping in the Tustin Ranch area, specifically: · the southerly side of Bryan Avenue between Browning Avenue and Tustin Ranch Road · the northerly side of Bryan Avenue between Browning Avenue and Jamboree Road, excepting that portion adjacent to the SCE substation · the easterly side of Browning Avenue between the northerly comer of Tract No. 13094 (southerly of Bent Twig Lane) and E1 Camino Real, including area from APN 500-201-02 for a future overcrossing, but excepting that portion adjacent to the SCE substation · the westerly side of Tustin Ranch Road between the Santa Ana I-5 Freeway and Jamboree Road · the easterly side of Tustin Ranch Road between Bryan Avenue and Jamboree Road, excepting that portion adjacent to Heritage Park between Heritage Way and Kinsman Circle, that portion adjacent to the Golf Course northerly and southerly of the main entrance, and that portion adjacent to the park site at Tustin Ranch Road and Portola Parkway q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc Harr{s & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Aprit 14, 2003 Page 7 · the southerly side of Irvine Boulevard between the westerly boundary of Tract No. 13053 and the easterly boundary of Tract No. 13038 (+630 feet easterly of Myford Road) · the northerly side of Irvine Boulevard between the westerly City limits and Jamboree Road · the westerly side of Jamboree Road from Bryan Avenue northerly 1,100 feet to the northerly boundary of Tract No. 13030 · the westerly side of Jamboree Road between Irvine Boulevard and the northerly City limits, except that portion adjacent to the Tustin Sports Park · the slopes on the westerly side of Jamboree Road between the northerly City limits and 600 feet southerly · the slopes and parkways on the easterly side of Jamboree Road between the northerly City limits and Tustin Ranch Road, including the slopes granted to the City by the Transportation Corridor Agency per Instrument No. 1999048101 recorded January 22, 1999 (net acreage increase of 4.11 acres) · La Colina Drive, northerly and southerly sides, between Tustin Ranch Road and the westerly City limits · Portola Parkway, both northerly and southerly sides, between Jamboree Road and Tustin Ranch Road · Equestrian/Hiking Trail between Tustin Ranch Road/Portola Parkway and Peters Canyon Regional Park · Paseo for public access between Jamboree Road and Pioneer Road adjacent to Tract Numbers 14366 and 14576 The total landscaped area is approximately 51 acres. These areas are shown on the Landscape Maintenance Facilities Map, in the Appendix. The District will fund costs in connection with the District maintenance and servicing including, but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, water, materials, contracting services, and other expenses necessary for the satisfactory operation of these facilities. Reference is made to Part "D" of this report for a discussion of the Benefit Areas and the facilities associated with them which are serviced and maintained. The facilities are described as follows: Landscaping and Appurtenant Facilities Facilities include but are not limited to: Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, fixtures, sidewalk maintenance resulting from landscape growth and appurtenant facilities, in public rights-of-way, parkways, and dedicated easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District. q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc ~'~11 Harris & Associates I City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apri[ 14, 2003 Page 8 Lighting and Appurtenant Facilities Facilities include but are not limited to: Poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, conductors, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and appurtenant facilities as required to provide lighting in public rights-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District. The public lighting system shall be maintained to provide adequate illumination. Electricity for street lights shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company, and it shall be adequate for the intended purpose. Rates for power shall be those authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual operation, maintenance and servicing of the landscaping, public lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping, public lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the maintenance of any of the public lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric energy for the public lighting facilities, or for the lighting or operation of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing the general nature, location and the extent of the improvements to be serviced and maintained, are on file in the office of the City Engineer and are by reference herein made a part of this report. q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports~llmdO304.doc IIHarr{s & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apri[ 14, 2003 Page 9 PART B ESTIMATE OF COST The City's budget for the maintenance and service costs, shown below, details the estimated costs and fund balances for Fiscal Year 2003-04 as available at the time of preparation of this report. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost can be recovered in the assessment spread including incidental expenses. This was not changed by Article XIIID of the California Constitution. The costs can include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with the district proceedings. The Reserves, District Administration and Projected Fund Balance items have been prorated based on the budget amounts. FY 2003-04 BUDGET & ASSESSMENT District Less Projected Reserve Admin. Fund Balance Total to Service Category Budget (50% Max.) (*No. 6018) 6/30/2003 Asmt Arterial and Collector Street Lighting $80,962 $29,178 $1,992 (32,957) $79,175 *Object No. 6220 Local Residential Lighting $ 8,638 $3,100 $213 (3,516) $8,435 *Object No. 6220 -- Parkway, Slope and Trail Landscaping $398,000 $134,703 $9,795 (162,014) $380,484 *Object Nos. 6028, 6132, 6335, 6350 Totals $487,600 $166,981 $12,000 ($198,487) $468,094 Total to Assessment: $468,094 * For descriptions of the object numbers, refer to the 'Budget Detail' table in the Appendix. Note: District Administration Costs are prorated based on the Budget Amounts and include Orange County's charge of 0.3% of the assessment for placement and collection on the property tax roll. The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City will make funds available to the District to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed upon receipt of assessments. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. The 1972 Act allows a reserve for cash flow not to exceed 50% of the budget. For a breakdown of the costs by Service Category and Benefit Area, please see "Benefit Areas" on page 17 of this report. q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc Harr{s & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apri[ 14, 2003 Page 10 PART C ASSESSMENT ROLL The Assessment Roll is a listing of the proposed assessment and the amount of assessment for Fiscal Year 2003-04 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor's Office, and contained in the Assessment Roll on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Tustin, which is incorporated herein by reference. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Orange and these records are, by reference, made part of this Report. q:\tustin\fyO3-O4~eports\llmdO304.doc ~'~1 Harr{s & Associates City of Tusfin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apri[ 14, 2003 Page !! PART D METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT GENERAL The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and landscaping facilities. Street and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The 1972 Act permits the designation of areas of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." In addition, Proposition 218 (Prop. 218), the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which was approved on the November 1996 Statewid_e ballot and added Article XIIID to the California Constitution, requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Prop. 218 provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. Prop. 218 also requires that publicly owned property which benefit from the improvements be assessed. REASON FOR THE ASSESSMENT The assessment is proposed to be levied to defray the costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities, including but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services. EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Since the assessment will be levied against parcels of property as shown on the tax roll, the final charges must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be spread just by parcel, not considering land use or parcel size, a single family parcel would be paying the same as a 50 unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment in a similar zone and this would not be equitable. The single family residential lot has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments and is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to calculate the EDU's for other residential land uses and for non-residential parcels. Every land-use is converted to EDU's: parcels containing apartments are converted to EDU's based on the number of dwelling units on each parcel of land; commercial parcels are converted based on the lot size of each parcel of land. q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc IlHarris & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Aprit 14, 2003 Page 12 The EDU method is seen as the most appropriate and equitable method of spread for landscape and lighting districts, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type and size. Single Family Residential (SFR). Parcels zoned for single family residential uses are assessed 1 EDU per dwelling unit. Parcels designated as SFR land-use will be assessed 1 EDU per dwelling unit, including vacant subdivided residential lots and vacant land zoned for single family residential uses with a tentative or final tract map. Multiple Family Residential. Multiple-residential (including condominiums) land use equivalencies are determined based on the number of dwelling units on each parcel. Due to population density and size of structure relative to the typical single family residence, each dwelling unit defined as multi-family residential, including condominiums, would be 0.75 EDU. The EDU's assigned to a multiple-residential parcel are calculated by multiplying the number of dwelling units by the EDU factor of 0.75. This includes vacant multi-family residential parcels zoned for multiple-residential uses with a tentative or final tract map. Non-Residential. In converting non-residential properties to EDU's, the factor used is the City of Tustin's typical standard single family residential lot area and the number of lots that could be subdivided into an acre of land. All properties that are developed for non-residential uses are therefore assigned 6 EDU's per acre. These include commercial, industrial, church, school and other non-residential uses. Vacant Parcels with No Development Designation. Vacant parcels with ho development designation or without a tentative or final map are assigned a reduced equivalency due to their current lack of immediate development potential. Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the total value of the property. In Tustin Ranch, the land value portion of a single family detached residence appears to be typically one-third or higher of the total value based on the County Assessor's tax rolls. Therefore, vacant parcels are assigned equivalency units at the rate of one-third of improved property which is 6 EDU/acre x one-third = 2 EDU/acre. Park parcels are also considered as vacant with no development potential, and are assessed at that rate. Peters Canyon Regional Park is a large, natural, open space park with very few facilities, which straddles the cities of Orange and Tustin and a portion of unincorporated county area. The park has many access points around its perimeter and one is within the Tustin Ranch area. This park receives a very small amount of benefit relative to its size, and it seems reasonable to compare it to other existing parks within Tustin Ranch. There are currently seven developed parks, five public parks (Camino Real, Cedar Grove, Heritage, Laurel Glen, and the Tustin Sports Park) and two private parks, with an average park size of 6.26 acres~. Therefore, 6.26 acres have been used to estimate the relative benefit Peters Canyon Regional Park receives. Golf Course Property. Golf Course parcels are developed commercial property, but the development is at a very low level. Therefore, golf course parcels are assessed at a rate between developed and vacant land, at twice the rate of vacant parcels with no development designation, which is 2.0 EDU/acre x 2 = 4.0 EDU/acre. 1 As of FY 1997-98, when the District was approved by public owner ballot. q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc iiII Harn's& Associates City of Tusfin - Landscape and lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apri[ 14, 2003 Page 13 Public Property. Article XIIID of the California Constitution requires that all benefiting public properties be assessed for their fair share of the special benefit. Public property which is designated for residential or non-residential purposes (such as schools and fire stations) will be assessed the same as private property with the same designation. Public parks will be assessed the same as vacant parcels with no development designation. Exempt Property. Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public drainage, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and parkways. Also excepted from assessment would be utility rights-of-way, common areas (such as in condominium complexes), landlocked parcels, unbuildable parcels vacated by the City, and parcels designated on Tract or Parcel Maps for landscaping. EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT (EDU) FORMULA Land Use Basic Unit x EDU Factor Single Family Res. (SFR) 1 D.U. x 1.00 Multi-family Res. (including Condos) 1 D.U. x 0.75 Commercial/Industrial and other Non-Residential (including Schools) 1 Acre x 6.00 Vacant (including Parks) 1 Acre x 2.00 = EDU Rates = 1 EDU/DU = 0.75 EDU/DU = 6.0 EDU/ac = 2.0 EDU/ac 1 Acre x 4.00 = 4.0 EDU/ac Golf Courses SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS STREET LIGHTING BENEFIT Proper maintenance and servicing of the street lighting system benefits all properties within the District by providing security, safety and community character and vitality as outlined below. Street lights provide only incidental benefits to motorists traveling to, from or through the area. BENEFITS OF STREET LIGHTING Security and Safety · Mitigates crime · Alleviates the fear of crime · Enhances pedestrian safety Community Character and Vitality · Promotes social interaction · Promotes business and industry · Contributes to a positive nighttime visual image A large portion of the City of Tustin is within an Ad Valorem Lighting Maintenance District and is paying for the operation and maintenance of street lights in a similar manner. The area of the District, being a recent annexation to the City, was not a part of this Ad Valorem Maintenance District. Therefore, to fund the public street lights in the developing area, in 1985 the City established the 1972 Landscape and Lighting District. Those properties that are adjacent to private streets pay for their local private street lights through their Home Owners Association fees. q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc ~ I Harris & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apfi[ 14, 2003 Page 14 Arterial and Collector Lighting. Street lighting on the arterial and collector streets provides special and direct benefits to all properties within the District, as these lighting benefits are directly related to the positive enhancement of the Community and therefore increase property desirability and quality of life. All properties within the District receive a special benefit from lighting on the arterials and collectors. Lighting at intersections, which is defined as safety lighting, is considered to be the minimum lighting requirement for vehicular safety; therefore, safety lighting represents the general benefit portion of street lighting and is not assessed. Traffic Signals are also considered to provide a general benefit and are not assessed. Street lights which are not adjacent to the development in the District are deemed not to benefit the area. Street lights on the east side of Jamboree Road, north of the 1-5 Freeway, which provide benefit to the property on the east side of Jamboree, are not included in this District and the costs will not be assessed. The following table shows the number of parcels, dwellings, acres and EDUs for each land use type that receive this benefit. Arterial & Collector Lighting Benefit FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 By Land Use Parcels Dwellings Acres EDU's Parcels Dwellings Acres EDU's Single Family Res. 2,582 2,603 * _ 2,603.000 2,602 2,602 2,602.000 Multi-family Res. 2,975 5,100. 3,825.000 2,975 5,100 3,825.000 Non-Residential 60 183.454 1,100.724 60 183.454 1,100.724 Schools 10 48.573 291.438 10 48.573 291.438 Vacant 1 3.715 7.430 1 3.715 7.430 Parks 22 72.135 144.270 22 72.135 144.270 Golf Course 12 151.991 607.964 12 151.991 607.964 Total 5,662 7,703 459.868 8,579.826 5,682 7,702 459.868 8,578.826 * Some "SFR" parcels are developing tracts with multiple SFR dwelling units. As maps are recorded and parcels assigned new APNs, the parcels will increase to match the dwellings. NOTE ON DIFFERENCES IN THE ABOVE TABLE: Two SFR parcels were being assessed for 22 planned SFR units. The parcels have now subdivided into 22 SFR lots. This accounts for the gain of 20 parcels (22 new SFR parcels minus 2 old SFR parcels), yet no increase in dwelling units. Local Residential Lighting. Many of the residential units in the District have private street lighting systems directly adjacent to their homes. This lighting is usually provided by a Home Owners Association, and payment for the lights are usually made through association dues or assessments. Parcels that have local residential street lighting provided by the City receive special and direct local lighting benefit and are assessed for those local lights. There are eighty- seven local residential 5,800 lumen lights and four 9,500 lumen lights. The cost for these lights is assessed only to these benefiting parcels. q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc IlHarn's & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apri[ 14, 2003 Page 15 The following table shows the number of parcels, dwellings and EDUs that receive this benefit. There were no changes from the previous fiscal year. Local Residential Lighting Benefit By Land Use Parcels Dwellings Single Famil7 Residential 369 369 369 369 EDU's 369.O00 369.000 LANDSCAPING BENEFIT Trees, landscaping, hardscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value. In Parkways and Land Values, written by John Nolan and Henry V. Hubbard in 1937, it is stated: ...there is no lack of opinion, based on general principals and experience and common sense, that parkways do in fact add value to property, even though the amount cannot be determined exactly .... Indeed, in most cases where public money has been spent for parkways the assumption has been definitely made that the proposed parkway will show a provable financial profit to the City. It has been believed that the establishment of parkways causes a rise in real estate values throughout the City, or in parts of the City,... It should be noted that the definition of "parkways" above may include the roadway as well as the landscaping along side the roadway. _ Landscaping along recreational trails and greenbelts, if well maintained, provide beautification and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value. In Greenways for America by Charles E. Little, it is stated: ... [real estate] agents routinely advertise properties as being on or near the trail .... property near but not immediately adjacent to the Burke-Gilman Trail is significantly easier to sell and, according to real estate agents, sells for an average of 6 percent more as a result of its proximity to the trail. Property immediately adjacent to the trail, however, is only slightly easier to sell .... trails are an amenity that helps sell homes, increase property values and improve the quality of life. Additionally, the National Recreation and Park Association, in June 1985, stated: The recreation value is realized as a rise in the value of land and other property in or near the recreation area, and is of public interest to the taxpayers, who have a stake in a maximum of total assessed values. The District enjoys a higher'level of landscaping and streetscaping in their parkways and slopes than the rest of the City of Tustin. The City provides funding for the landscaped medians in the area, so these costs are not assessed. Additionally, a pedestrian and equestrian trail, which will one day be linked with the regional trail system, is landscaped and beautified by the District. The landscape q:\tustin\fyO3-O4~repods\llmdO304.doc IlHarr{s & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apri[ 14, 2O03 Page 16 improvements along the arterial and collector streets, in the parkways and slopes, and the regional trail enhance the beauty of the area and benefit all parcels in the community. Excepted from this landscaping benefit are the Tustin Marketplace, Tustin Annex, and the Tustin Auto Center, which provide their own landscaping adjacent to their properties at an even higher level than the rest of the District. Landscaping along roadways provides only incidental benefits to motorists traveling to, from or through the area. The following table shows the number of parcels, dwellings, acres and EDUs for each land use type that receive this benefit. Landscaped Parkway, Slope & Trail Benefit FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 By Land Use Parcels Dwellings Acres EDU's Parcels Dwellings Acres EDU's Single Family Res. 2,582 2,603 * 2,603.000 2,602 2,602 2,602.000 Multi-family Res. 2,975 5,100 3,825.000 2,975 5,100 3,825.000 Non-Residential 19 32.624 195.744 19 32.624 195.744 Schools 10 48.573 291.438 10 48.573 291.438 Vacant 1 3.715 7.430 1 3.715 7.430 Parks 22 72.135 144.270 22 72.135 144.270 Golf Course 12 151.991 607.964 12 151.991 607.964 Total 5,621 7,703 309.038 7,674.846 5,641 7,702 309.038 7,673.846 * Some "SFR" parcels are developing tracts with multiple SFR dwelling units. As maps are recorded and parcels assigned new APNs, the parcels will increase to match the dwellings. NOTE ON DIFFERENCES IN THE ABOVE TABLE: Two SFR parcels were being assessed for 22 planned SFR units. The parcels have now subdivided into 22 SFR lots. This accounts for the gain of 20 parcels (22 new SFR parcels minus 2 old SFR parcels), yet no increase in dwelling units. q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc !~ II Harr{s & Associates I City of Tustin - Landscape and Ughting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apri[ 14, 2003 Page 17 BENEFIT AREAS There are three benefit areas within the District: Benefit Area A - parcels that receive only Arterial and Collector Street Light benefit. Benefit Area B - parcels that receive Arterial and Collector Street Light benefit and Parkway, Slope, and Trail Landscaping benefit. Benefit Area C - parcels that receive Arterial and Collector Street Light benefit, Parkway, Slope, and Trail Landscaping benefit, and Local Residential Lighting benefit. The following tables provide a summary of parcels, dwellings, acres, EDU's and Costs by Benefit Area for the District. The Service Category Costs are based on the EDU's and rates for each benefit area. FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 By Benefit Area Parcels Dwellings Acres EDU's Parcels' Dweilings Acres EDU's A 41 -- 150.830 904.980 41 -- 150.830 904.980 , B 5,252 7,334 309.038 7,305.846 5,272 7,333 309.038 7,304.846 C 369 369 -- 369.000 369 369 -- 369.000 Total: 5,662 7,703 459.868 8,579.826 5,682 7,702 459.868 8,578.826 Service Category Costs by Benefit Area FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 Arterial & Local Parkway, Arterial & Local Parkway, Benefit Collector Residential Slope & Trail Total to Collector Residential Slope & Trail Total to Area Street Lights Lighting Landscaping Assessment Street Lights Lighting Landscaping Assessment A $ 8,056 $8,056 $ 8,352 $8,352 B $65,035 $349,299 $414,334 $67,417 $362,188 $429,606 C $3,285 $8,136 $17,642 $29,063 $3,406 $ 8,435 $18,296 $30,136 Totals $76r375 $8~136 $366~941 $451~452 $79~175 $8~435 $380?484 $4687094 q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc IlHarris & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report Apri[ 14, 2003 Page 18 ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY The tables below summarize the assessment amounts per EDU for each Benefit Area. Service Category and Benefit Area FY 2003-04 ASSESSMENT RATE SIYMMARY ACLT - Arterial & Collector Lighting $9.23 / EDU FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 LRLT - Local Residential Lighting $22.86 / EDU Actual Max. Asmt Rates Actual Total PSTL - Pkwy, Slope & Trail Landscape $49.58 / EDU Asmt Rates (incl. CPI)* Asmt Rates Asmt Benefit Area A (ACLT) $8.90 / EDU $9.23 / EDU $9.23 / EDU $8,352 Benefit Area B (ACLT + PSTL) $56.71 / EDU $58.81 / EDU $58.81 / EDU $429,606 Benefit Area C (ACLT + PSTL + LRLT) $78.76 / EDU $81.67 / EDU $81.67 / EDU $30,136 $468,094 * See "Maximum Assessment Rate Calculations" in the Appendix for details on the calculation of the Max. Assessment Rates The base assessment rate which may be levied for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) may be increased by the CPI for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside Area in any calendar year by City Council approval each year. The CPI for Calendar Year 2002 (December 2001 to December 2002) is 3.7%. The proposed assessment rates by land use category for each Benefit Area are shown below. ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY BY LAND USE FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 BENEFIT AREA: A B C A B -C ACLT + ACLT + PSTL ACLT + ACLT + PSTL LAND USE ACLT PSTL + LRLT ACLT PSTL + LRLT Single Family Res. (S/Dwelling Unit) $56.71 /DU $78.76/DU $58.81 /DU $81.67/DU Multi-family Res. (S/Dwelling Unit) $42.53 / DU $44.11 / DU Non-Residential (S/ac) $340.26 / ac $352.86 / ac Non-Res - Tustin Market Place (S/ac) $53.40 / ac $55.38 / ac Golf Course (S/ac) $226.84 /ac $235.24 /ac Vacant and Parks (S/ac) $113.42 / ac $117.62 / ac I, Joan E. Cox, P.E. the authorized representative of Harris & Associates, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer, am of the opinion that the assessments have been apportioned in accordance with the estimated special benefit derived by each parcel and that the assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit. DATED: April 11, 2003 Harris & Associates By: q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc ,~AN E. COX, P.E. ASSESSMENT ENGINEER R.C.E. No. 41965 Harris & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report April 14, 2003 Page 19 PART E PROPERTY OWNERS LIST The property owner list with the names and addresses of each property owner of each lot or parcel, as shown on the Assessment Diagram referenced in Part F herein, is the list of property oWners within the District boundaries as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Orange and is, by reference, made part of this report. PART F ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. q:\tustin\fTO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc 1Harr{s & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report April 11, 2003 Appendix Appendfx q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304,doc IlHarris & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report April 11, 2003 Appendix BUDGET DETAIL FY 2003-04 DISTRICT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET District City's Estimate of Object No. Description Budget ($) Costs ($) Comments Annual Engineer's Report - Dist. Admin.; County charge 0£0.3% for placement on 6018 ArchitecffEng Services 12,000 12,000 property tax bills 6028 Landscape Maintenance 207,000 207,000 Contract- Turf& groundcover maint. 6132 Tree Trimming Contract 90,000 90,000 Contract - approx. 1,500 trees/yr 6220 Street Light Energy 89,600 80,962 Street lights - Arterial & Collector 8,638 Street lights - Local 6335 Electric 11,000 11,000 For irrigation equipment 6350 Water 90,000 90,000 IRWD service areas DISTRICT TOTAL 499,600 499,600 BUDGET DETAIL FY 2002-03 DISTRICT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET District City's Estimate of Object No. Description Budget ($) Costs ($) Comments Annual Engineer's Report - Dist. Admin.; County charge of 0.3% for placement on 6018 Architect/Eng Services 13,500 13,500 property tax bills 6028 Landscape Maintenance 205,000 205,000 Contract - Turf & groundcover maint. 6 132 Tree Trimming Contract 85,000 85,000 Contract - approx. 1,500 trees/yr 6220 Street Light Energy 96,600 87,287 Street lights - Arterial & Collector 9,313 Street lights - Local 6335 Electric 12,000 12,000 For irrigation equipment 6350 Water 90,000 90,000 IRWD service areas DISTRICT TOTAL 502,100 502,100 Maximum Assessment Rate Catcutations by Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases FY 2003-04 CPI WORKSHEET Benefit Area A Max Actual Base Year CPI Rate ($) Rate ($) FY 1997-1998 7.91 7.91i FY 1998-1999 1.2% 8.00 7.87 FY 1999-2000 2.2% 8.18 8.04 FY 2000-2001 2.8% 8.41 8.04 FY 2001-2002 3.7% 8.72 8.40 FY 2002-2003 2.1% 8.90 8.90 FY 2003-2004 3.7% 9.23 9.23 Benefit Area B Max Actual CPI Rate ($) Rate ($) 50.38 50.38 1.2% 50.98 50.98 2.2% 52.10 52.10 2.8% 53.56 52.10 3.7% 55.54 55.54 2.1% 56.71 56.71 3.7% 58.81 58.81 q:\tustin\fyO3-O4\reports\llmdO304.doc Benefit Area C Max Actual CPI Rate ($) Rate ($) 69.96 69.96 1.2% 70.80 70.27 2.2% 72.36 71.82 2.8% 74.39 7 !.82 3.7% 77.14 76.38 2.1% 78.76 78.76 3.7% 81.67 81.67 1Harris & Associates City of Tustin - Landscape and Lighting District, FY 2003-04 Engineer's Report April 11, 2003 Appendix Budget & Assessment Comparison FY 2003-04 Budget & Assessment District Less Projected Reserve Admin. Fund Balance Total to Service Category Budget (50% Max.) (*No. 6018) 6/30/2003 Asmt Arterial and Collector Street Lighting $80,962 $29,178 $1,992 (32,957) $79,175 *Object No. 6220 Local Residential Lighting $ 8,638 $3,100 $ 213 (3,516) $8,435 *Object No. 6220 Parkway, Slope and Trail Landscaping $398,000 $134,703 $9,795 (162,014) $380,484 *Object Nos. 6028, 6132, 6335, 6350 Totals $487,600 $166,981 $12,000 ($198,487) $468,094 ,, Total to Assessment: $468,094 FY 2002-03 Budget & Assessment District Less Projected Reserve Admin. Fund Balance Total to -- Service Category Budget (50% Max.) (*No. 6018) 6/30/2002 Asmt Arterial and Collector Street Lighting $87,287 $25,956 $2,412 (39,279) $76,375 *Object No. 6220 Local Residential Lighting $9,313 $2,756 $257 ($4,191) $8,136 *Object No. 6220 Parkway, Slope and Trail Landscaping $392,000 $140,510 $10,831 ($176,400) $366,941 *Object Nos. 6028, 6132, 6335, 6350 Totals $488,600 $169,222 $13,500 ($219,870) $451,452 Total to Assessment: $451,452 Lighting and Landscape District Fund Batance Projection Beginning Fund Balance 06/30/02 Projected Revenues FY 02-03 Projected Expenditures FY 02-03 Projected Ending Fund Balance FY 02-03 q:\tustin\fyO3-O4~reports\llmdO304.doc $267,487.00 $430,000.00 $499,0O0.00 $198,487.00 Per Finance Dept. Full Collection per Engineer's Report per Mid Year budget Projections Harris & Associates I-- 0 Z uJ 0 CO kO 0 laO 0 0 i~ CO O0 ~- 0 CO ~ ~0 CO O~ ~- O~ LO O0 ~- I~ z CO ~- I~ 0 O~ CO ~- ~0 CD ~- LO CO I~ ~0 C~I CO ~ ~0 CO I~ ~:~ laO I~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 Z ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o o o ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --- . ..... ~~~ >>~> ~ ~~oooo = = 0 0 = 0 _1 M• - E• GNI •• MI • MO r MI • MI • MN MI CITY OF TUS11N LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR THE 2003 -04 FISCAL YEAR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES MAP LEGEND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SLOPE MAINTENANCE REDUCED SCALE 526 -161 01 THRU 34 525- 161 -RI 114544 66 525- 171 -1e 11190 40 525 - 172-07 THRU 55 TRACT N0. 14797 15428 15429 15430 n I_IT 525 -022-03 No. *310,1 525 - 151 -01 I7100 73 PETERS CANYON REGIONAL PARK TRACT 15661 114 UNITS s -17 1 55 s264 -0, TIIRU 5! TRACT Nor 14301 and 14748 103 0/101 525- 041 -01 17410 27. 41 THRU 02 525-051 -01 71404! 40, 72 THRU 98 525 -061 -01 THRU 00, 93 THRU 68 525- 061 -73 MU 41 525 - 071 -01 THRU 23 TRW? He. 14410 1043 7714. TRACT No. 15992 502- 451 -45 1 1R4n 502 - 431 -53 938-22 -0e PS 6u 5271100 55001 325 - 131 -01 IHRU 65 525 -144 -01 THOU 13,21 525 -142 -01 THOU 50 525-091 -01 THRU 43 TRACT No. Id/St e1 13411 502- 631 -01 THRU 12 502 - 632 -01 TIM 29 503- 633 -01 THOU 22 502 -634-07 INRU 18 -451- 25.27.30.31 MOM •91 41.4 AC TRACT N.. 13560 wn 502 - 415-12 01110 WSW '•• -487 -0I 1x144 50 491-01 HMU 47 50201 -01 14405 47 TRACT No. 45507 Nunn 502- 522 -01 THRU 46 502 -521 07 15151 1 TRACT No. 15504 91043 TRACT 77502 TRACT No. 15585 TRACT No. 15401 �Wn 502 -511 -01 THOU 44 501- 045 - 01,0409 MIS 4C NMR OW !An 50 093-19 0714 4C 501 -096- 4OMU 50 ?YI 7 501- 045 -12. 475 7.79 4C 501 141 01,02,05 TRACT No. 13786 11443 TRACT No. 45420 AIWA 501- 271 -01 THRU 75 501 - 121 -01 I 7x044 67 I- 017-01 TRW 81 601 -098 -04 17.79 4C. 938 -I2 -183 75401) 499 772447 N0. 73 13824 TRACT No. 14700 10/10 501- 241 -01 934 -00 -417 THRU 524 TRACT No. 13700 501 -113 10 MU 411 501 113 -78 Mil 4C TRACT No. 73909 I? 451 507- 131 -01 THRU 30 501 104-04 1444 4c 301 191 -01 7100 32 501 109 -0I THRU 70 TRACT Na. 13707 79.1 13734 451 701- 113-08 oat �AL, 50I- 113-07 3OAQ An AC 701- 201-01 79911 68 501 /13-09 m.79 aC 1- 103-02 MAR 179 501-201 -01 11165 II, 74 TRACT No. 74447 TRACT N68 13035 and 15574 NO 1043 502 - 471-34 THRU 50 502- 471-01 THRU 20 502- 451 -73 11100 89 502- 471 -57 11175 09 502- 452-04 1x15 m 502- 451 -22 THRU 42 502- 401 -74 11110 69 502 -461 -01 TNR11 21 954 -08 -550 11410 019 954-00 -047 THRU 824 301 -108 -01 7910 68 TRACT No. 13990 41 14413 501 -107 -01 THOU 23 052- 77-077 7009 279 TRACT No. 74080 13 W43 501 - 104-07 A7! 4C TRACT No. 13733 934 -44-375 19.80 512 501 112-05 TIM 04 12, 14, It 11430' n11n 4711014 1411 301 112 -01. 12, 15, 917 14107 AC TRACT No. 154741 500- 344 -37 1111111 52 00 11417$) TRACT No. 15475: 500- 341 -01 111411 21 (21 114115 TRACT No, 15427, 500- 341 -59 T11911 74 (28 UNITS No. 15474, 15475, 15427 TRACT No. 15360 500- 351 -01 7HAU 14 416 41103 500 -221 -07 9 10 imam MIK TRACT No. /J038 51 F2471e 4 5007 ,Er 4r. TRACT No. 13096 934 -00 -178 now 444 ay loom.= 500 - 211 -04 13 THRU Irmo) 10 500- 272-07 TN TRICE No. 13030 500- 244 -07 171041 10 AM AMIR. MOAT MAC? Ha. 42018 500 - 205-0? 11400 73 nwn TRACT No. 13657 000- 372 -01 91011 09 14379 4C 311 -0I TRACT No. 13041 300 -207 -01 MU 47 500- 206 -01 MU 80 us 1043 TRACT N4 12759 500 -191 14 15 See IN11 TRACT No. 13554 500 -291-02 THRU 18 76 4461 AC 500- 181-02 104 -252- 500 -187 -1 01.02,03 1»10 104 - 352-04 (9421912 500- 301-08 500 -297 -1474 MDR) 0: \Tustin \£003- 04 \Diograms \Asmtdlsg.dwg 04/13 /2003 dao • i - i - - r - - - - • - - • • r MI MI CiTY OF TUSTiN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR THE 2003 -04 FISCAL YEAR ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM /BOUNDARY MAP LEGEND BENEFIT AREA A BENEFIT AREA B BENEFIT AREA C CITY BOUNDARY 526- 161 -01 111111 34 525- 161 -66 1HRU p 525 -171 15 111151 40 525 -772-07 1170 53 523- 022-03 525- 131 -0t RAW 73 PETERS CANYON REGIONAL PARK ...\...s. REDUCED SCALE 522031 --001 TM 27, 73 711110 06 525 -7)61 -01 17407) 00, 63 RIRU 60 525 - 001 -13 IllSt) 41 525- 071-01 11100 39 ✓ r^ r wr �`` 095-22 -010 7HRIl 621 1� 021 -006 -01 17171 49 INT. MALT N. 756+5 502 -451-45 r w" 302- 451-53 MCI N. 14114 wwn 902 -43 7 -01 1111U 12 502- 033-01 1170 26 502 -423 -01 1106$ 22 302 -634 -01 7100 10 003 -051-01 11110 30 5021.401 -01 THOU 47 502-001 -01 THRU 47 303- 453 -19 PM PIPS IACT $. 15663 MMA 502- 521-01 DM 44 Thir AV"' 1A511$./m57 502- 471 -54 T40 54 502 -471 -01 770 26 502- 461 -73 THRU 51 002 - 471 -57 100 01 502 -442-04 MHRU 20 001- 441 -22 1100 42 501- 441 -54 1780 01 502- 441 -01 THRU 21 TA0? 114 10003 001 -100 -014 4 01 AYH Al RAYS 077 MIN Arai Carsn 1744C11M 1540 APM 501 -271 -01 NW 501 721 -01 7H111.1 17 111.4L7 114 13700 PA 301 -131 -0I Thal 30 001 -110-01 77101 70 MCI N. 757 13701 APA 301 -100-01 T10t1 M 51407 Na 19110 /I PA 501 107-01 7770 23 1- 113 -743 m� H� 001 - 113-00 IN r 301 713.07 501 -119-00 1130 111ACT Asa 13025 and 16074 774 alp 301- 172-65 MU 016 IL 14. 14 Art 44 saw rPA AM 054 - 06-530 THRU 611 454-06 -447 MU 624 TRACT 1H. 15474: 600- 341 -37 THRU 02 16 UNIT TRACT He. 15476: 600- 341 -01 THRU 21 21 51013) TRACT Ha 15427: 500- 341 -51 THRU 74 26 UNITS 500 - 211-00, 13 71011 TACT Na 13115 500 -244-01 71011 10 MI PPE 18 0 M. PUMA ( 107 ) TACT Na 14010 000- 117-0/:RV 00 110/1 144. 15307 005- 313 •01 1771 00 MINI IS 005 311 -01 TACT 11 13044 300 -101 -01 MI 47 300.1110 -01 POI /0 n wA MC N4. 12701 300 - 101 -14, 10 um 17■1C11M 73001 300 -221-02 7100/ 11. 16 •YIt AL 104•�572_�300 -101 0742,03 tfmro 104332-01 { f -5 } 500- 301-00 300 -217 I3. 74 (45017 J a \ Tustin \fVJ- 04 \Dlogfoms \Asmtdlog.dwg 04/13/200) day CITY OF TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR THE 2003 -04 FISCAL YEAR LAND USE MAP LEGEND Residential Commercial Vacant Parks Government Golf Course City Boundary 515 -111-01 111111 34 5111 - 134 -111 DM N 510 -171 15 710.1 45 015- 173 -07 TRI 55 525- 151-01 MN 75 PETERS CANYON REGIONAL PARK TRACT Mu 14341 rI 14741 144 saw REDUCED !MALE 525- 041 -01 11540 37, 41 7MU 02 3325 - X011 -01 �l 000. 73 7500 Y 525 - 001-13 MINI 41 525 -071 -0 1 THAI 33 5=5 -OH -01 RAW 43 Taff. m1C1 Ir. 11005 502 -431-45 .,... 502 - 401-51 - 441-01 1W M 1 -01 1H5U 47 102 -001 -01 THIN 47 115127 IM. 15151 3322- 322 -0I TIM 14 102- 521-07 ur NI•468-01.41,7 MAP a MN MY 1.411 002- 471 -34 71011 N 502- 471 -01 NM 25 002- 451 -73 1110 N 000- 471 -57 1181 N 502 -412-04 MU 34 502- 45l -22 THIN 43 002 -141-04 THIN N 002- 441 -01 THIN 21 411441-14 13451 141107 414 IMO I, OOP l01 -50-34 NRI a MIRA ran 501 -121 -01 WM A W-01-417 IINla =aft 1DR MI IMO wlw.w .+► 501 -N341 v0- N1-113-15 I Opfw1,1A 10 801-I3?-01 7MU a 501 -17-01 11581 70 NI -u1-N KM AG 1MC7 r• 12751 wr. 11111 010 004-05-447 11541 124 I 10107 Ns. 154744 500 -30 -37 TM 52 (15 13400 M. 154751 530- 341 -01 MI 21 ((221 UI515 13401 XL 151271 500-141 -N SRI 74 0 11wU41f -N WA a Miff 11/4 Mw 500- 144-01 1340 10 MI .Yrw. 000 - 511 -0.13 TIMU Imo o.wa 34744,11071 I 15117 lw 10044 541 -157-0) a. 150-310-01 MN a 1r. 11111317 415. IVN 141.101 -34 fl 50401.01 .1 -13,14 Raw" ¢\r551m\Y03 -0+1 11AanW15Phr9 0+11J/200,3 ecc