Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 CODE AMEND 95-004 11-20-95NO. 2 11-20-95 Inter-Com DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 1995 TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUSJE¢~ CODE AMENDMENT 95-004; AMENDMENTS TO OFFICE OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Approve the Environmental Determination for the project by adopting Resolution No. 95-112 2. Have first reading by title only and introduce Ordinance No. 1157 approving Code Amendment 95-004, as submitted or revised. FISCAL IMPACT The Code Amendment is a city initiated project and will have no fiscal impact to the City. The proposed ordinance is intended to establish administrative procedures which will improve efficiency of department operations. BACKGROUND The Office of Zoning Administrator was originally established in 1972 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 552. The duties and powers of the Zoning Administrator were expanded and more clearly defined in 1994. Last spring, at the request of the Planning Commission, the Community Development Department staff started to review the provisions of the zoning code to identify additional types of applications which might be authorized by the Zoning Administrator. The purpose of assigning additional authority to the Zoning Administrator was to expedite processing of minor, routine applications and to reduce costs to the applicant. In 1994, the Community Development staff conducted an initial survey of Orange County cities to determine whether the city had assigned Zoning Administrator authority and the scope of that authority. As part of the possible expansion of Tustin's Zoning City Council Report Code Amendment 95-004 November 20, 1995 Page 2 Administrator authority staff resurveyed all 31 Orange County cities to obtain more detailed information and to assess if any changes had occurred over the past year. A Planning Commission workshop was held on August 28, 1995 to present the results of the updated survey to the Commission. The workshop also covered such items as the Planning Commission's oversight of the Zoning Administrator's actions and additional types of applications that could be assigned to the Zoning Administrator. As a result of the workshop, the Planning Commission provided specific direction to staff on the formation of a proposed ordinance. On October 23, 1995 the Planning Commission approved the Zoning Administrator Ordinance changes and recommended that the City Council adopt Code Amendment 95-004. The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved the draft ordinance. A public hearing notice identifying the time, date and location of the public hearing on this amendment was published in the Tustin News and posted at Tustin City Hall and Police Department. Since this project is effective citywide, notices were not required to be mailed to property owners. DISCUSSION Code Amendment 95-004 would improve processing efficiency for certain routine conditional use Permits, and specific development and variance applications that are presently required to be approved by the Planning Commission. The Zoning Administrator would also continue to be allowed to refer any aPplication deemed controversial or complex to the Planning Commission for their action. Under existing code provisions, Minor Adjustments can be approved by the Zoning Administrator. Deviations from the code in excess of limitations prescribed as Minor Adjustments require a Variance to be approved by the Planning Commission. Code Amendment 95-004 would expand the Zoning Administrators authority to grant the following types of Variances: City Council Report Code Amendment 95-004 November 20, 1995 Page 3 o 20% deviation in architectural projections ~ o 20% deviation for distances between accessory and main structures o 20% deviation in setbacks for buildings,landscaping, pools/spas/equipment o 20% deviation in required parking for non-residential uses o 10% deviatiOn of required building site area More intensive Variance actions will continue to require Planning CommisSion approval. Code Amendment 95-004 would also expand the listing of conditional use permits to be approved by the Zoning Administrator to include the following: o On-site alcoholic beverage sales in restaurants o Second-hand sales, without pawning o New construction of commercial and industrial uses, providing more than 50% of office use on the ground floor o Accessory building used for guest room o Temporary uses up to six months Two new specified development applications will be assigned to the Zoning Administrator. o Amendments to conditions of approval, that are minor in nature and do not alter the intent of the site or the project o Minor Design Reviews in Redevelopment Project Areas involving minor facade or site modifications, single family homes and new or modified accessory structures The Community Development Department has recently initiated a comprehensive Zoning Code update. As part of the process usage and understanding of the code will be simplified, appropriateness of existing regulations will be reviewed and new standards may be instituted which may reduce the need for certain types of conditional use-permits or variances. Zoning Administrator actions result in expedited processing and reduced applicant costs. A typical Zoning Administrator case can be processed and brought to hearing in 2-3 weeks compared to Planning Commission cases which may take 6-8 weeks. The Community City Council Report Code Amendment 95-004 November 20, 1995 Page 4 Development Departments Fee Schedule also recognizes that Zoning Administrator applications are generally routine and require less staff time. Ordinance No. 1157 adopting amendments to the Office of Zoning Administrator is attached for the City Council as Exhibit A. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council approve Code Amendment 95- 004 by first reading and introduction of Ordinance No. 1157. Assistant Director christ[ne A~n Assistant City Manager RW: kbm~ccreport\ca95004, rw Attachments: Planning Commission Resolution No. 3402 Initial Study/Negative Declaration Resolution No. 95-112 Ordinance No. 1157 1 RESOLUTION NO. 95-112 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE FOR CODE AMENDMENT 95-004 INCLUDING REQUIRED FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The City Council finds and determines as follows: A. The request to approve Code Amendment 95-004 is considered a "project" pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act. m o A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project and has been distributed for public review. C , Whereby, the City Council of the City of Tustin has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Director and other interested parties with respect to the subject Negative Declaration. m o The City' Council has evaluated the proposed. final Negative Declaration and determined it to be adequate and complete. II. A Final Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA and State guidelines. The City Council approval authority over Code Amendment 95-004 has received and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration, prior to recommending approval of the proposed project, and found that it adequately discussed the environmental effects of the proposed project. On the basis of the initial study and comments received during the public review process, the City Council has found that, the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 95-112 Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of November, 1995. JIM POTTS Mayor PAMELA STOKER City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) SS CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 95-112 PAMELA STOKER, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the. City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is 5; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 95-112 was duly and regularly introduced, passed and adopted at a regular meet of the Tustin City Council, held of the 20th day of November, 1995. COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: PAMELA STOKER City Clerk 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1157 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 9299, A PORTION OF CHAPTER 2 OF ARTICLE 9 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATED TO THE OFFICE OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR (C.A. 95-004) The City Council of the City of Tustin finds and determines as follows: a. The Tustin City Code was amended in 1972 to establish the Office of a Zoning Administrator who would have certain authority to grant minor adjustments to standards of development, as well as certain specified conditional use permits and development applications. o It has been determined that there is a need to improve processing efficiency for certain routine minor variations and administrative actions. C · The amendment will not have an adverse affect on the public health, safety or welfare on residents or buSinesses of the · city. D · The amendment is consistent with the General Plan in that it will not negatively impact the orderly growth and development of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Tustin DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Section 9299, et. seq., of Article 9, Chapter 2, Part 9 of the Tustin City Code entitled Zoning Administrator is hereby repealed in its entirety and a new Section 9299 et. seq., entitled Zoning Administrator, is added to read as follows: 9299 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR a. Office Created An Office of the Zoning Administrator is hereby created pursuant to Section 65900 et. seq., of the California Government Code. b. Duties The Community Development Director, or his/her designee, acting as the Zoning Administrator, shall have dual responsibility with that of the Planning Commission to hear and decide in accordance with Council Policy and provisions of this Chapter, and has the authority to approve, conditionally approve or deny the following requests when such requests constitute a reasonable use of property not permissible under a strict literal interpretation of the regulations. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to forward any matter listed below to the Planning Commission for consideration and action. Requests for Minor Adjustments and Zoning 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. 1157 Page 2 Administrator Variances in excess of the limitations prescribed in this subsection, or those development standards not specifically listed in this subsection, shall be subject to the approval of a Variance by the Planning Commission. Requests for Conditional Use Permits or other specified development applications not specifically listed in this subsection shall be subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit or other discretionary review by the Planning Commission or other reviewing body as applicable. 1. Minor Adjustments: a) A decrease of not more than 5% of the required building site area. b) A decrease of not more than 10% of a required building or landscaping setback. c) An increase of not more than 20% in the maximum permitted height of a fence or wall, subject to city approved structural design. d) An increase of not more than 10% of the permitted projection of steps, stairways, landings, eaves, cornices, canopies, overhangs, masonry chimneys, raised porches and fireplaces into any required building Setback. e) An increase of not more than 10% in the maximum permitted building height. f) A decrease in the number of required off-street parking spaces for non-residential land uses up to a maximum of 10%. g) A decrease of not more than 10% in the permitted distances between detached accessory structures and main structures. 2. Variances when required by the City Code. a) A decrease of not more than ten percent (10%) of an individual required building site area. b) An increase of not more than twenty percent (20%) of the permitted projection of steps, stairways, landings, eaves, cornices, canopies, overhangs, masonry chimneys, raised porches and fireplaces into any required building setback. c) A decrease of not more than twenty percent (20%) in the permitted distances between detached accessory structures and main structures. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. 1157 Page 3 o d) e) A decrease in the number of required off-street parking spaces for non-residential land uses up to a maximum of twenty percent (20%). A decrease of not more than twenty percent (20%) in the required setbacks for buildings, landscaping, swimming pools, spas and equipment. Conditional Use Permits when required by the City Code: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) Dish'antennas. Bulk vending machines. Large collection facilities. On-Premise Dry Cleaning. Minor CUPs for existing developmen~ where there would be no change of occupancy or primary use, there would be no expansion of floor area, and the request would not alter the original intent of the project or site. On-site alcoholic beverage sales licenses for restaurants. Secondhand sales when pawning is not included. Development or construction of new buildings in the Commercial General (CG) or Industrial (M) Districts where more than fifty (50) percent of the total area, or any portion of the ground floor, is designated for occupancy by professional or general offices. i) Accessory buildings used as guest rooms. j) Temporary Uses for a period of up to six (6) months. Specified Development Applications: a) Soil remediation activities, subject to the same findings as required for a Conditional Use Permit. b) Time extensions of not more than 12 months from the original expiration date for Minor Adjustments, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Design Reviews, subdivisions and other development applications, subject to the same noticing requirements that were given at the time the project was originally approved. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. 1157 Page 4 C · c) 'Except where design review is required by the Planning Commission pursuant to an adopted specific plan, (a) design review applications within redevelopment project areas; (b) minor design reviews within redevelopment project areas which include modifications to existing structures and/or existing facade or site modifications which constitute a change in three (3) or less major design elements which do not result in a completed facade upgrade; (c) single family homes not part of a subdivision, (d) residential room additions and (e) new or modified accessory structures associated with existing development. d) Amendment to Conditions of Approval established by Planning Commission or City Council. Condition amendments that are determined by the Community Development Director to be minor in nature and will not alter the original intent of the project or site. Examples would include changes to exterior materials, colors, elevations, landscaping, walls/fences and hours of operation. Application Process o Submittal Requirements - Applications for Minor Adjustments, Conditional Use Permits or other specified development applications that would be subject to action by the Zoning Administrator shall be filed with the Community Development Department pursuant to the Department's current application procedures and fee schedule. Applications should be acCompanied by a written description as to how the applicable positive findings for the project type applied for identified in Subsection 3 below can be justified. A single application may include more than one request applicable to the same project. Applications subject to action by the Zoning Administrator shall be processed and approved, conditionally approved or denied within the time limits established by state law for actions of development projects. o Public Hearinq and Noticinq Requirements - Upon determination that an application is complete, the Community Development Department Shall schedule the matter for consideration by the Zoning Administrator. If a public hearing is required for the type of application considered, notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Government Code Section 65091. Minor Adjustments shall be considered by the Zoning Administrator without a public hearing. Additional noticing time as specified in Government Code Section 65091 may be required to comply with noticing requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. In the event of a conflict between required noticing times, the longer time shall be given. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 ~25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. 1157 Page 5 o Required Findinqs (a) Minor Adjustments may be granted only when such adjustments are found to be in conformance with the General Plan and when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, or surroundings, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. Any Minor Adjustment granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations 'upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which the subject property is situated. Minor Adjustment to reduce the required amount of parking shall be granted only when,, in addition to the findings above, the following findings can also be made: 1) The intent of the parking regulations is preserved; 2) The parking provided will be sufficient to serve the use intended and potential future uses of the same site; and 3) The adjusted decrease in the number of parking spaces shall.not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare or materially injurious to properties located in the general vicinity. b o Variances may be granted only when such variances are found to be in conformance with the General Plan and when because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, or surroundings, the strict application. of the Zoning Code is found to deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identified zone classification. C · Conditional Use Permits may be granted only when such conditional use permits are found to be in conformance with the General Plan and when the establishment, maintenance, or'operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of the particular use, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, or injurious or detrimental to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19' 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. 1157 Page 6 e o d o Design Review Applications may be approved only if such applications are found to be in conformance with the General Plan and if the location, size, architectural features and general appearance of the proposed development will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future develogment therein, the occupancy thereof, or the community as a whole. In making such findings, the following items shall be considered: 1) Height, bulk and area of buildings 2) Setbacks and site planning 3) Exterior materials and colors 4) Type and pitch of roofs 5) Size and spacing of windows, doors and'other openings 6) Towers, chimneys, roof structures, flagpoles, radio and television antennae 7) Landscaping, parking area design and traffic circulation 8) Location, height and standards of exterior illumination 9) Location and appearance of equipment located outside of an enclosed structure 10 Location and method of refuse storage 11 Physical relationship of proposed structures in the neighborhood 12) Appearance and design relationship of proposed structures to existing structures and possible future structures in the neighborhood and public thoroughfares 13) Proposed signing · 14) Development guideline and criteria as adopted by the City Council . Zoninq Administrator Action - After consideration of the application, and after making the appropriate findings as required above, the Zoning Administrator shall take action to approve, approve with conditions .or deny the application. Notice of actions taken by the zoning Administrator shall be transmitted to the applicant, Planning Commission and City Council prior to the end of the appeal period and shall be determined to be final unless appealed pursuant to Subsection "d" below. The Zoning Administrator shall provide notice to the applicant within two business days following the action. Appeal to Planning Commission/Redevelopment Agency The applicant, or any other interested party, may appeal any action of the Zoning Administrator with respect to the action, or any condition imposed, to the Planning Commission, or an appeal of a Design Review application within a Redevelopment Project Area to the Redevelopment Agency, by filing a written notice and paying applicable fees, as established by 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. 1157 Page 7 f . resolution, to the Community Development Department within seven (7) calendar days of the Zoning Administrator's action. Upon receipt of an appeal, the Community Development · Department shall schedule the matter for consideration, giving the same notice as provided under Subsection "c2" above. After consideration of the appeal, the Planning Commission or Redevelopment Agency shall take action to approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. The Planning Commission or Redevelopment Agency may uphold, modify or overrule all or parts of the Zoning Administrators's action. Actions of the Planning Commission or Redevelopment Agency on Minor Adjustments, Conditional Use Permits and other specified development applications shall be supported with the findings required by Subsection '!c3" above. Appeal to City Council The applicant, or any other interested party, may 'appeal any action of the Planning Commission with respect to the action, or any condition imposed, to t'he City Council by filing a written notice and paying applicable fees, as established by resolution, to the Community Development Department within seven (7) calendar days of the Planning Commission's action. Upon receipt of an appeal, the Community Development Department shall schedule the matter for consideration, giving the same notice as provided under Subsection "c2" above.' After consideration of the appeal, the City Council shall take final action to approve, approve with conditions or deny the. application. The City Council may uphold, modify or overrule all or parts of the Planning Commission's action. Actions of the City Council on Minor Adjustments, Conditional Use Permits and other specified development applications shall be supported with the findings required by Subsection "c3" above. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the day of , 1995. JIM POTTS Mayor PAMELA STOKER City Clerk