The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12 P.C. ACT AGENDA 04-03-95 gENDA ACTION AGENDA NO. 12 4-3-95 TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MARCH 27, 1995 WORKSHOP - The City Attorney conducted a workshop on the Brown Act at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. CALL TO ORDER: 7.:08 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CALL: Present: Baker, Kasalek, Lunn, Mitzman and Weil PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda.) At this time members of the public may address the Commission regarding any items not on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission (NO action can be taken off-agenda items unless authorized by law). IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY MATTER, PLEASE FILL OUT' ONE OF THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE SO THAT YOUR REMARKS ON THE TAPE RECORDING OF THE MEETING CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO YOU. WHEN YOU START TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. IF YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECORDING SECRETARY AT (714) 573-3105. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) Planning Commission Action Agenda March 27, 1995 Page 2 1. Minutes of the March 13, 1995 Planninq Commission Meeting. 9_. Conditional Use Permit 94-029 Recommendation - Adopt Resolution No. 3345 as submitted. Commissioner Well moved, Kasalek Seconded, to approve the consent calendar. Motion carried 5-0. REGULAR BUSINESS: 3. Use Interpretation 95-002 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: VILLAGE PROPERTIES ATTN: ROBERT ISACKSON 562 MISSION STREET, STE. 201 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2906 13348 NEWPORT AVENUE RETAIL COMMERCIAL (C-i) DISTRICT THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 3) PURSUANT TO SECTION 15303 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). TO DETERMINE THAT A PHARMACY WITH DRIVE-THRU SERVICE IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE RETAIL COMMERCIAL (C-i) DISTRICT WITH THE APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission determine by Minute Motion that a pharmacy with drive-thru service is allowed within the Retail Commercial (C-i) District with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Presentation: Scott Reekstin, Assistant Planner Commissioner Weil moved, Lunn seconded, to approve by Minute Motion that a pharmacy with drive-thru service is allowed within the Retail Commercial (C-1) District with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Motion carried 5-0. · Status Reports Received and filed. Planning Commission Action Agenda March 27, 1995 Page 3 PUBLIC HEARINGS: IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM CONSIDERED AT A PUBLIC HEARING IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS AGENDA, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING. · General Plan Amendment 94-001, Zone Change 94-004, Second Amendment to the East Tustin Development Agreement & Tentative Tract Map 15055 (Irvine Company) CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF MARCH 13, 1995 APPLICANT/ OWNER LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: THE IRVINE COMPANY P.O. BOX I NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8904 SECTORS 2, 6, 8 AND 11 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNED COMMUNITY; EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN ADDENDUM #5 TO EIR 85-2 HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15164 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94-001 RELATED TO LOT 27 OF TRACT 13627 AND LOT 6 OF TRACT 12870. 2. ZONE CHANGE 94-004 RELATED TO LOT 27 OF TRACT 13627 AND PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 88-315. 3. SECOND AMENDMENT TO EAST TUSTIN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATED TO LOTS 16/17 AND 27 OF TRACT 13627, AND PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 88- 315. ~-~ 4. EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS RELATED TO THE LAND USE MAP, SECTOR DESCRIPTIONS TEXT AND STATISTICAL SUMMARIES TO REFLECT REQUESTS 1, 2 AND 3 ABOVE. 5. AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE CONCEPT PLAN FOR SECTOR 11 TO REFLECT REQUESTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 ABOVE'. Planning Commission Action Agenda March 27, 1995 Page 4 · TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15055 TO SUBDIVIDE A 40 ACRE SITE (PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 88-315) AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF IRVINE BOULEVARD AND TUSTIN RANCH ROAD INTO THREE (3) NUMBERED LOTS AND SEVEN (7) LETTERED LOTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 350 FAMILY- ORIENTED APARTMENT UNITS, UP TO 163 SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED UNITS AND A 5 ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK CONSISTENT WITH REQUESTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 ABOVE. Recommendation - Pleasure of the Commission. Presentation: Daniel Fox, Senior Planner Commissioner Mitzman stepped down due to conflict of interest. · CommiSsioner Lunn stepped down due to conflict of interest. Commissioner Weil moved, Kasalek seconded, to adopt Resolution 3340 as submitted, certifying the Environmental Impact report and Addendum No. 5 and recommending that the City Council certify the EIR. Motion carried 3-0. Commissioner Well moved, Baker seconded to adopt Resolution 3341 recommending to the City Council amendment to the East Tustin Development Agreement subject to the final approval of the City Attorney with the following modifications; 1) The attached Exhibit A be modified to add a new paragraph 9 to read, "The building height of any future development provided on Lot I of Tentative Tract 15055 shall be limited to provide a two story appearance for those buildings located adjacent to Tustin Ranch Road and 50% of those buildings located adjacent to Irvine Boulevard." 2) The attached Exhibit A be modified to add a new paragraph 10 to read, "Lot i of Tentative Tract 15055 Medium High Density Site, Perimeter LandsCaping. The perimeter landscaping along Tustin Ranch Road and Irvine Boulevard of any future development provided on Lot i of Tentative 'Tract 15055 shall be at minimum provided .in accordance with'the following: Trees: One tree for each (ten) 10 linear feet of street frontage along Tustin Ranch Road and Irvine Boulevard shall be provided. Said trees shall be provided in the following ratios: 45% 24"-Box trees 40% 36"-Box trees 15% 48"-Box trees Planning Commission Action Agenda March 27, 1995 Page 5 Shrubs: Twelve (12) 5-Gallon shrub for each 25 linear' feet of street frontage along Tustin Ranch Road and Irvine Boulevard shall be provided. In addition to the eucalyptus and canary island pine identified in the landscape concept plan additional trees with a broad canopy shall be included in the perimeter tree planting palette along Tustin Ranch Road and Irvine Boulevard to provide effective landscape screening subject to final approval of the Community Development Department and Public Works Department. Ail other landscaping on the subject site shall comply with the City's Landscape and Irrigation Guidelines." Motion carried 2-1. Commissioner Kasalek opposed. COmmissioner Weil moved, Baker seconded, to adopt Resolution 3342, recommending to the City COuncil approval of General Plan Amendment 94-001 as submitted. Motion carried .2-1. Commissioner Kasalek opposed. Commissioner Weil moved, Baker seconded, to adopt Resolution 3343 recommending to the City Council approval of the Zone Change 94-04 to change the zoning designation and the East Tustin Specific Plan Land Use Plan as amended. Exhibit D, would include an additional change to Section 3.10.1.C to reflect the parking changes as requested by Commissioner Weil and identified' in Table 5 of the staff report. (See attachment to Action Minutes) Motion carried 2- 1. Commissioner Kasalek opposed. CommissiOner Weil moved, Baker seconded, to adopt Resolution 3344 recommending .to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map 15055 revised as follows,. Page 13. Condition 9.7 shall read, "Building height of any future development of Lot i of Tentative Tract 15055 shall be consistent with the height limitations specified in the Second Amendment to the East Tustin Development Agreement. Condition 9.8 shall read, "The perimeter landscaping of any future development of Lot i of Tentative Tract 15055 along Tustin Ranch Road and Irvine Boulevard shall be consistent with the perimeter landscaping ,requirements specified in the second amendment to the East Tustin Development Agreement." Motion carried 2-1. Commissioner Kasalek opposed. Commissioner Weil moved, Baker seconded, to adopt Resolution 3346 to conditionally approve an amendment to Sector 11 Conceptual Site Plan of the East Tustin Specific Plan as submitted. Motion carried 2-1. Commissioner Kasalek opposed. Planning Commission Action Agenda March 27, 1995 Page 6 Commissioners Lunn and Mitzman returned to the panel. STAFF CONCERNS: 6. Report on Actions taken at March 20, 1995 City Council Meeting Staff reported on the subject agenda. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Commissioner Lunn - none Commissioner Weil - Welcomed Denny's Restaurant to the City of Tustin. - Asked the status of the Palm Reader sign Staff will follow up and report back to the Commission on the results of the notice and order which has been issued. Commissioner Kasalek Mentioned that the temperature in the Council Chamber was extremely cold this evening. Commissioner Mitzman Stated that sidewalk sales appear to be back at Home Depot. Stated that he had received a letter from the Senior Housing Council requesting use of the Senior Center for July 20, 1995. Staff will forward the letter to the Community Services Department for scheduling. Stated he will be on vacation and will not be attending the April 10th meeting of the Planning Commission. Planning Commission Action Agenda March 27, 1995 Page 7 Commissioner Baker Asked if work had commenced along the side of the Home Depot building near ~the car wash. Staff stated that Home Depot will be requesting complete outdoor sales on weekends; have not completed the traffic work and have asked to bring it before the Commission in any case. Stated he would also not be attending the April 10th Planning Commission' Meeting'due to a prior commitment. Commissioner Well moved, Lunn seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT: .. The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission is on April 10, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at 300 Centennial Way, Tustin. Planning Commission Report GPA 94-001, ZC 94-004, Development Agreement Amendment & TT March 27,1995 Page 7. 15055 TABLE 5 Section 3.10.1.C entitled "Residential Off-Street Parking Requirements,, would need to be amended to read as follows: District Estate Low Requi red Ass i gned Guest/ ~i~!~l~ .................. Spaces/Unit I~.n~.igned On-Street ".3 2 :~ 2 Car Garage 2 per unit :.:.: .:.: 1. Sector 8, 9, 10 2 2. Sector 2 2 Medium Lo~' 2 Medium & Medium High 2 Car Garage 2 per unit 2 Car Garage 2 per unit 2 Car Garage ~ ~-5 per unit O% 50% 1. Detached 2 2. Attached Studio 1.0 1 Bedroom 1.5 2 Bedroom 2.0 3 Bedroom 2.0 4 Bedroom 2.5 3. Multiple Family (apartments) Studio 1.0 1 Bedroom 1.5 2 Bedroom 2.0 3 Bedroom 2.0 4 Bedroom' 2.5 4. Patio Homes(2) 1-3 Bedrooms 2.0 4 Bedrooms 2.5 2 Car Garage ~ ~-5 per unit 1 Carport (1) 1 Carport (1) 2 Carports (1) 2 Carports (1) 2 Carports (1) Carport (1) Carport (1) ~ Carport (1) Carports (1) Carports (1) 50% 2 Car Garage i~ ~-~ per unit 50% 2 Car Garage ~ .-~ per unit 50% (1) Attached single family and multiple family developments shall provide a minimum of i!!~2-~ per unit open unassigned parking spaces for 4 or more dwelling units. If a two ca~'""enc[osed private garag~'is provided, a guest parking standard of ii!~i~-~ open unassigned spaces per unit shall apply. -, · (2) Required guest parking for Patio Home products must be located within a 200 foot radius measured from the nearest building frontage facing a street, drive or court of the designated unit which the parking space is intended to serve. Should the Planning Commission desire to include changes to the parking requirements, as represented in Table 5 above, or as proposed by the applicant, staff believes that it would be appropriate to implement those changes as part of the Amendments to the ETSP rather than as amendments to the