Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 T.T. MAP 14188 AMD 03-06-95.0 NO. 1 3-6-95 DATE: MARCH 6, 1995 Inter-Com TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJEC~ AMENDMENT TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14188 (STANDARD PACIFIC) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Approve the Environmental Determination for the project by adopting Resolution No. 95-26; and . Approve Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14188 by adopting Resolution No. 95-27, as submitted or revised. FISCAL IMPACT There are no fiscal impacts associated with this project, as this is an applicant initiated project. The applicant has paid application fees to recover the cost of Processing this application. BACKGROUND In June of 1990, the City Council approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14188 which authorized the subdivision of an approximate 19- acre site to accommodate 57 single-family detached residential dwellings. Subsequent to that approval, the developer recorded the Final Map and commenced construction of the development. To date, 16 Of the 57 dwellings (28% of the project) have been completed. The applicant is requesting approval for three new residential product types which will be added to the buildout of the project. The total number of dwelling units for this project will not be increased. On February 13, 1995, the Planning Commission approved Design Review 94-033 and recommended to the City Council approval-of Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract 14188 by adopting Resolution Nos. 3324 and 3325 respectively (Attachment B) . City Council Report Amendment to VTT 14188 March 6, 1995 Page 2 Located in Sector 8 of the ETSP, the site is bordered by Township Drive to the east, Lot 4 of Tract 12870 to the south, Lot 26 of Tract 13627 to the north and unincorporated residential properties to the west. A public hearing notice identifying the time, date and location of the public hearing on this project was published in the Tustin News. Property owners in the existing tract, and within 300 feet of the entire tract boundary were notified of the hearing by mail and notices were posted on the site, at City Hall and the Police Department. The applicant was informed of the availability of a staff report on this project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE PLAN ... · The applicant is proposing to add three new product types which will be used in the buildout of the existing development. No modifications-to the previously approved street system or lot configuration of the development is proposed as part of this project. The original approved plans for the subject development included seven (7) different floor plans ranging in size from approximately 3,450 square feet to 4,170 square feet. Of the seven floor plans, three (3) were single-story and located along the western boundary of the development adjacent to the residential units in unincorporated territory as a requirement of the ETSP. To date, homes on Bennett, Kiser and on the south end of .Lambert have been completed in the south westerly portion of the development. A total of 16 units in the project have been completed which represents 28% of the entire project. Of the remaining 41 units left to be built in the development, the applicant is intending to construct 11 (19% of entire project) of the original production units. Plans 1, 2 and 3 are proposed to be locatedJ on Lots .6, and 10 through 17 as originally approved. In addition Plans 7 and 5 will be located on Lots 1 and 5 respectively, also as originally approved. This would ensure that the single-story homes are located along the western boundary consistent with the proVisions of the ETSP, and that the three vacant lots within the completed portion of the project (original model complex on Bennett) would be completed with the previously approved product. City Council Report Amendment to VTT 14188 March 6, 1995 Page 3 The applicant is intending to construct 30 of the new Plans 8, 9 and 10 (53% of the entire project) on Stanley, Cheney and Suddaby (Lots 18 - 47). A new model complex consisting of a temporary sales trailer, parking lot and landscaping is proposed on Lot 33 (corner of Township Drive and Cheney) within the remaining buildout area. The proposed modifications meet or exceed all other development standards required by the ETSP, except as noted above. Please refer to Attachment A for a complete statistical summary of the project. PUBLIC CONCERNS Prior to making a formal application to the City for the proposed changes, the applicant informed the Homeowners Association and residents of the desired modifications. In response to those discussions, .the residents identified several concerns with the project related to aesthetics, safety, noise and property values. Major concerns identified include: The sales trailer should not be located within the existing portion of the development. Construction' shOuld commence at the north end of the development. · Construction hours should be strictlY enforced. · Lambert should be permanently'closed from the new development. Lots 1, 5, and 6 should be developed with the original approved plans. The Planning Commission considered each of these~items in detail in review of the project. The proposed development plans, and conditions of approval have been included in the Planning Commission Resolution No. 3324, to address each of these issues. The residents and the developer have reached consensus as to the treatment of Lambert Drive. Instead of permanently'closing Lambert Drive as originally suggested by the residents, the residents and the applicant have agreed to the proposed conceptual plans that would require the developer to install monument signs, upgraded landscape treatments and decorative pavement treatments on Lambert Drive in the vicinity of Lots 9 and 10, as well as, at the project entrances on Bennett and Cheney. Conditions have been included in City Council Report Amendment to VTT 14188 March 6, 1995 Page 4 the Planning Commission Resolution that would require the final design details'of these specified improvements to be approved by a representative group of four residents, selected by the majority of the existing residents, prior to issuance of any permits. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Based upon review of Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14188, as well as, Environmental Impact Report 85-2, it's supplements and addendum, it has been determined that environmental issues relating to this project have previously been addressed and the initial study for the project is attached to this report. Also, appropriate mitigating measures identified in EIR 85-2 are included as conditions of approval for the project. With this information in mind, it is recommended that the Council make the finding that requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been met and that no further envirOnmental review is required. CONCLUSION Given the analysis conducted by the Community Development Department and in consideration of comments from other agencies and the public, it is concluded that the proposed project meets the requirements of the East Tustin Specific Plan, the Subdivision Map Act, as adopted, and the California Environmental Quality'Act. With the inclusion of Conditions of approval listed in Planning commission Resolution No. 3324, it is recommended that the City pprove Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14188. Daniel F, ,~~iCP Senior Planner CAS:DF :br;mp/TT14188 /~hristine A. S~gleton'" Assistant Cit~anager Attachments: Location Map' Proposed Site Plan/Elevations Attachment A - Statistical Summary ' Attachment B - Planning Commission Reso. No. 3324 and 3325 Initial Study Reso. Nos. 95-26, and 95-27 LOCATIO N MAP i' // .YNARD ~ DR. ~laJOl,,,lla~T To TT I q-I 8 8 NO SCALE PR.OPOSED -SITE PLAN & ELEVATIONS m TUSTIN RANCH TRACT 44188 TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA STANDARD PACIFIC OF ORANGE COUNTY ENTRANCE STUDIES I : I ! ; · a: h 'F--- 8 "' ,,' / i {Ii l; g., I,J, ' [ : thi~ JJ 'J:'! :':': iJlll / / CHENEY STREET l/ / / S ST, ~0'~ / TUSTIN RANCH SALES TRAILER ?RAC'T 14¶88 TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA STANDARD PACIFIC ~ C~I),N~E CO4.~4T'Y CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PLAN i · · i i ~0 II I:lhi it.!; ,0589 I ._J Z © ~.,~ ~.;l~ Iii,ill i~olJ~. © ]lhll Il,d,; Z © :i:ll,i ? I:[IIII o I !Il: l ATTACHMENT A - Statistical Sununary Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14188 and DR 94-033 Gross Site Area Residential (Lots 1-57) Private Streets (Lots A) Landscape (Lots B, 'C, D) Requirement N/A N/A N/A N/A Proposed 19.162 acres 15.41 acres 3.17 acres .57 acres Total Units N/A 57 units Density 4 du/ac (gross) 2.975 du/ac (gross) Lot Coverage 50% 22% Building Setbacks Front Yard 20 feet minimum 20 feet minimum Side'-Yard 5 feet 5 feet Rear Yard 15 feet minimum 30 feet minimum (adjacent to ~xisting County residential area) 28 feet minimum 30 feet Height 35 feet maximum 23 feet (single story) 29.5 feet (two story) Resident Parking 114 garages (2 garages per unit) 171 garages (3 garages per unit) Guest Parking 114 on-street spaces (2 per unit) 122 on-street spaces) Unit Floor Plans Sq. Ft. Plan Type Quantity Percentaqe Plan 1 3,448 Plan 2 4,077 Plan 3 4,056 4 br Plan 4 3,600 5 br Plan 5 3,736 5 br Plan 6 4,000 5 br Plan 7 4,167 5 br Plan 8 3,275 5 br Plan 9 3,340 4 br Plan 10 3,540 5 br 4 br/2.5 ba 4 7 4 br/3.5 ba 4 7 /4 ba 4 7 /4.5 ba 3 5 /3 ba 4 7 /4.5 ba 3 5 /5.5 ba 5 8 /3.5 ba 10 18 /4 ba 10 18 /4.5 ba 10 18 ATTACHMENT B PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NOS. 3324 & 3325 5 10 11 12 13 14 ¸16 17 18 19 2~ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 RESOLUTION NO. 3324 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 94-033 TO ADD THREE ADDITIONAL PRODUCT TYPES TO THE BUILDOUT OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ON The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: · I. The Planning CommissiOn finds and determines as follows: ae Th'at a proper application, Design Review 94-033 was· submitted by Standard Pacific requesting approval to add three additional product types to the buildout of the previously approved development of Tract 14188. Be That the said application was considered by the Planning Commission on January 9, 1995, January 23, 1995 and February 13, 1995. C, Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin Municipal Code, the Commission finds that the location, size, architectural features and general appearance of the proposed development will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future' development therein, or the occupancy as a whole. In making such findings, the Commission has considered at least the following items: 1. Height, bulk and area of buildings. 2. Setbacks and site planning. 3. Exterior materials and colors. · Type and pitch of roofs. Size and spacing of windows, doors and other openings. Towers, chimneys, roof structures, flagpoles, radio and television antennae. . Landscaping, parking area design and traffic circulation. · Location, height and standards of exterior illumination. ATTACHMENT B Resolution No. 3324 Page 2 · Location and appearance of equipment located outside of an enclosed structure. 10. Physical relationship of proposed structures to existing structures in the neighborhood. 11. Appearance and design relationship of proposed structure to existing structures and possible · public thoroughfares. · . 12. Development.Guidelines.and criteria.-as adopted by the City Council. II. The Planning'CommisSion hereby conditionally approves Design Review 94-033 authorizing the addition of three new product types to the buildout of the existing development of Tract 14188, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto. Recording Secretary PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 13th day of February, 1995. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, BARBARA REYES, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am 'the Recording Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. ' 3324 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 13th day of February, 1995. Recording Secretary EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 3324 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DESIGN REVIEW 94-033 GENERAL (1) 1~1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans date stamped February 13, 1995 on file ..... ~ ........ ~-, ........ · ...... - ..... w~-~h.~-~he .... ~ommuni~y-~D~e~pment~.~De~a~tment.~.a$. ~e~ein-, modified or as modified by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve subsequent minor modifications to Plans during'Plan Check" if such modifications are to be consistent with provisions of the East Tustin Specific Plan. (1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in the Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. (1) 1.3 Design review approval shall become nulI and void unless all building permits are issued within eighteen (18) months of the date of this Exhibit. (1) 1.4 The applicant shall sign and return an Agreement to Conditions Imposed form prior to issuance of building , permits.' (1) 1.5 The applicant and property owner shall hold harmless and defend the City of Tustin for all. claims and liabilities arising out of the City's approval of the entitlement process for this project. . SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT (2) CEQA MITIGATION (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (3) -UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S (7) PC/CC POLICY (4) DESIGN REVIEW *** EXCEPTION Exhibit A- Conditions of Approval DR 94-033 Resolution No. 3324 Page 2 PLAN SUBMITTAL , (3) A. Construction plans, structural calculations, and Title 24 energy calculations. Requirements of the Uniform Building' codes, 'State' Handicap and. Energy Requirements shall be complied with as approved by the Building official. (2) B. (3) (2) (3) Preliminary technical detail and plans for all utility installations including cable TV, telephone, gas waster and electricity. Additionally, a note on plans shall be included .stating that no field changes shall be made without corrections submitted to and approved by the Building Official. Final grading and specification consistent with the site plan and landscaping plans and prepared by a registered civil engineer for approval by the Community Development Department. (2) ~ D. (3) Final street.improvement plans consistent with the site plan and landscaping plans and prepared by a registered civil engineer for approval by the Community Development Department. (2) E. (3) Model complex plans identifying all temporary fencing, landscaping, elevations, parking facilities and other temporary model complex facilities. (2) F. A detailed acoustical noise study prepared by a qualified acoustical expert shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department to insure that interior noise levels do not exceed a maximum of 45 dBa's and that the exterior noise levels shall not exceed a maximum of 65 dBa's. (1) 2.2 ~ubmitted construction drawings shall be in conformance with all development standards as applicable in the East Tustin Specific Plan. Conceptual approval of locations of structures shall not-constitute final approval. Any administrative adjustments are subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. Exhibit A- Conditions of Approval DR 94-033 Resolution No. 3324 Page 3 ,. SITE AND BUILDING CONDITIONS {.t3 ....3...Z-~..Pro~ide.:exact~de.ta~!s..~of,all.~.e~..t~=ior:~.doQ~.~D~..~.$n~9~, .... .~ ................ .~. (4) types, including but not limited to such'information as frame color and glass tint. (1) 3.2 Ail exterior colors to be used shall be subjeCt to review (4) and approval of the Director of the Community Development Department. All exterior treatments shall be coordinated with regard to color, materials and detailing and noted on submitted construction plans and elevations shall indicate all colors and materials to be used. (1) 3.3 Note on final plans that' a six-foot high chain linked fence shall be installed around the site prior to .building construction stages. Gated entrances shall.be permitted along the perimeter of the site for conStruction vehicles. (1) 3.4 Exterior elevations of the buildings shall indicate any (4) fixtures or equipment to be located on' the roof of the ~ building, equipment heights and type of screening. (1) 3.5 The model complex sales trailer shall be painted to be compatible with the propOsed color scheme for the subject product types. Final colors shall be noted on the plans and shall be subject to final approval of the Community Development Department. (1) 3.6 The front yard setback on LOt 11 shall comply with the requirements of the East Tustin Specific Plan which requires a minimum 20 foot front yard setback. *** 3.7 Construction traffic shall, be prohibited from accessing the development~ from Bennett, except for such construction traffic directly related to the buildout of " Lots'l, 5 and 6. *** 3..8 The construction of Lots 1, 5 and 6 shall occur prior to or concurrently with the construction of Phase I of the buildout of the subject project. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any dwelling within the next phase of new development unless certificates of ~ occupancy have been issued for Lots 1, 5 and 6. Exhibit A- Conditions of Approval DR 94-033 Resolution No. 3324 Page 4 *** 3.9 The construction of the decorative pavement treatments, upgraded landscape elements and project monumentation issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the dwellings on Lots 1, 5 or 6. 'LkNDsCAPING~ 'GROUNDS'AND HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS " , (1) 4.1 Submit at plan. check complete detailed landscaping and irrigation plans for the project, including the model Complex, consistent with adopted City of Tustin Landscaping and Irrigation Guidelines. Provide summary table identifying plant materials. The plant table shall list botanical and common names, sizes,, spacing, location and q~antity of the plant materials proposed. Show plantin~ and beaming details, soil preparation , staking, etc. The irrigation plan shall show location and control of backflow prevention devices, pipe size, sprinkler type, spacing and coverage. Details for all equipment must be provided. Show all property lines on the landscaping and irrigation plan, public right-of-way areas, sidewalk widths, parkway areas, and wall locations. The Community Development Department may request minor substitutions of plant materials or request additional sizing or quantity materials during plan check. Note on landscaping plan that coverage of landscaping and irrigation materials is subject to field. inspection at project completion by the Department of Community Development. (1) 4~2 A complete,' detailed project sign program including design, location, sizes, colors and materials shall be approved by the Irvine Company then submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department. The si~n .program shall include temporary project identificatiOn, model complex, addressing and street signs. All signs shall be in'accordance with-the City's Security Code. *** 4.3 A decorative pavement treatment shall be provided across ~ambert in the vicinity of Lot 10. Upgraded landscape treatments and project monumentation signs shall be provided outside of the travel way on Lambert in the vicinity of Lot 10 and at the intersection of Township Drive and Bennett. A representative group of four existing homeowners selected by ballot of a majority of Exhibit A- Conditions of Approval DR 94-033 Resolution No. 3324 Page 3 .. SITE AND BUILDING CONDITIONS .{.1,) .... a-.. 1 -:..Pro.v. ide ..-exact~..de.t~. 'Lls- ~ of. all.: .e.~t.erior. :...d..o. Qr.. :aDd... ~..$.n ~d QW. (4) types, including but not limited to such' information frame color and glass tint. .(1) 3.2 Ail exterior colors to be ubed shall be subject to review (4) and approval of the Director of the Community Development Department. Ail exterior treatments shall be coordinated with regard to color, materials and detailing and noted on submitted construction plans and elevations shall indicate all colors and materials to be used. (1) 3.3 Note on final plans that' a six-foot high chain linked fence shall be installed around the site prior to ~" .building construction stages. Gated entrances shall-be permitted along the perimeter of the site for construction vehicles. (1) 3.4 Exterior elevations of the buildings shall indicate any (4) fixtures or equipment to be located on the roof of the ' building, equipment heights and type of screening. (1) 3.5 The model complex sales trailer shall be painted to be compatible with the propOsed color scheme for the subject product types. Final colors shall be noted on the plans and shall be subject to final approval of the Community Development Department. (1) 3.6 The front yard setback on Lot 11 shall comply with the requirements of the East Tustin Specific Plan which requires a minimum 20 foot front yard setback. *** 3.7 Construction traffic shall be prohibited from accessing the development from Bennett, except for such construction traffic directly related to the buildout of "- Lots'l, 5 and 6. *** 3.8 The construction of Lots 1, 5 and 6 shall occur prior to or concurrently with the construction of Phase I of the buildout of the subject project. No certificate of _ occupancy shall be issued for any dwelling within the next phase of new development unless certificates of : occupancy have been issued for Lots 1, 5 and 6. Exhibit A- Conditions of Approval DR 94-033 Resolution No. 3324 Page 4 *** 3.9 The construction of the decorative pavement treatments, upgraded landscape elements and project monumentation ...... -,-~' ...... -~.~,-~-<.~:.~signs .... as-~equired~.be~o~.shall..be~.compl~.ed.....prior....,.t~... ...... ' issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the. dwellings on Lot~ 1, 5 or 6. 'L~NDsCAPING~ GROUNDS'AND HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS " , (1) 4.1 Submit at plan. check complete detailed landscaping and irrigation plans for the project, including .the model complex, consistent with adopted City of Tustin Landscaping and Irrigation Guidelines. Provide summary table identifying plant materials. The plant table shall list botanical and common names, sizes, spacing, location and quantity of the plant materials proposed. Show plantin~ and beaming details, soil preparation , staking, etc. The irrigation plan shall show location and control of backflow prevention devices, pipe size, sprinkler type, spacing and coverage. Details for all equipment must be provided. Show all property lines on the landscaping and irrigation plan, public right-of-way areas, sidewalk widths, parkway areas, and wall locations. The Community Development .Department may request minor substitutions of Plant materials or request additional sizing or quantity materials during plan check. Note on landscaping plan that coverage of landscaping and irrigation materials is subject to field '~ inspection at project completion by the Department of community Development. (1) 4~2 A complete,' detailed project sign program including design, location, sizes, colors and materials shall be approved by the Irvine Company then submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department. The si~n .program shall include temporary project identification, model complex, addressing and street signs. All signs shall be in accordance with.the city's Security Code. *** 4.3 A decorative pavement treatment shall be provided across Lambert in the vicinity of Lot 10. Upgraded landscape treatments and project monumentation signs shall be provided outside of the travel way on Lambert in the vicinity of Lot .10 and at the intersection of Township Drive and Bennett. A representative group of four existing homeowners selected by ballot of a majority of - Exhibit A- Conditions of Approval DR 94-033 Resolution No. 3324 Page 5 existing, homeowners (51%) with one vote per property shall review and comment to the City on the-final design · o:~..?.details.......pri. Q~ ....... to-. ~ssuance improvements. The final details should be in substantial conformance in scale and magnitude as those improvements conceptually identified and approved as part of this Exhibit. NOISE (1) 5.~ Prior to the issuance of any building permits: (2) (3) A final acoustical analysis report describing 'the acoustical design features of the structures required to satisfy the exterior and interior noise standards shall be submitted to the Tustin Community Development Department for approval along with satisfactory evidence which indicates that the sound attenuation measures specified in the approved acoustical report(~s) have been incorporated into the design of the project. The acoustical analysis shall, be prepared by an expert or authority in the field of acoustics. Ail residential lots~ and dwellings shall be sound "attenuated against pre~ent and projected noises, 'which shall be the sum of all noise impacting the project, so as not to exceed an exterior standard 65 dBa CNEL in outdoor areas and an interior standard of 45 dBa CNEL in all habitable rooms is required. Evidence prepared under the supervision of an acoustical consultant that these standards will be satisfied in a manner consistent with applicable zoning regulations shall be provided. (1) 5.2 Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Use or (3) Occupancy, field testing in accordance with the Title 25 regulations may be required by the Building Official to verify compliance with STC and IIC design standards. (1) 5.3 Ail construction operations, including engine warm-up, deliveries of materials and equipment, shall be subject to the provisions of the City 'of Tustin Noise Ordinance, ~as amended, and may take place only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday unless the Building. Official determines that said activity will be in substantial conformance with the Noise Ordinance and the public health and safety will not be impaired subject to Exhibit A-. Conditions of Approval DR 94-033 Resolution No. 3324 Page 6 application being made at the time the permit for the work is awarded or dUring progress of- the work. No .................. ~Sund~y. or Holiday. cons~ructign sha.ll be. Rermitted . ~- :' · ..... -. . . · . . .. - . . .., .... . ...... , ..... ,-.., . . . ..,~.. .' ·., ...: ~ ,~ ,.- ~... -. · ..: %.~ ~. · (1) 5.4 Construction hours shall be clearly posted on the project site to the satisfaction of the Building Official. FEES (1) $.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall (3) be made of all required fees as may be in effect at the (6) time of permit issuance, including but not limited to: A. Major thoroughfare and bridge fees in the-amount of $2,501 per unit to the Tustin Public Works Department, or as ~may be amended prior to permit issuance. B. Water and sewer connection fees to the Irvine Ranch Water District. Co Do Street improvement, grading and landscaping plan checks and permit fees to the Community Development Department based on most current schedule, as may be amended prior t6 permit issuance. All applicable Building plan check and permit fees to the Community Development Department based on the most current schedule, as may be amended prior to permit issuance. Ee New development fees in the amount of $350 per unit to the Community Development Department, or as may be amended prior to permit issuance. Fe School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School District subject to any agreement reached and executed between 'the District and the Irvine Company. Ge Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $25.00 (twenty-five dollars) pursuant to AB 3185, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990, enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Exhibit A- Conditions of Approval DR 94-033 Resolution No. 3324 Page 7 DF:br Resources code Section 21151 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15094. If within such'forty-eight (48) hour period that the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the.above- noted check, the .approval for the project granted herein shall be considered automatically null and void. In addition, should the Department of Fish and Game reject the Certificate of Fee Exemption filed with the Notice of Determination and require payment of fees, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, within forty-eight (48) hours of notification, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $850 (eight hundred fifty dollars) pursuant to AB 3158~ Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990. If this fee is imposed, the. subject project shall not be operative, vested or final unless and until the fee is paid. RESOLUTION NO. 3325 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14188. The 'Pl-anni~g"Commissi0n-of.-the. City .of. T~stin-..does..-hereby ..... resolve as follows: I e The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14188 was submitted to the Planning Commission by Standard Pacific for consideration; and~ Be That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for said Amendment bY the Planning Commission on January 9, 1995 and continued to January 23, 1995 and February 13, 1995, Ce ID. That an Environmental Impact Report (EIR 85-2 for the East Tustin Specific Plan) has been certified in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act for the subject project area. That the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the. Tustin Area General .Plan, adopted East Tustin Specific Plan, Development Agreement and SubdivisiOn Map Act as it pertains to the development of single family detached dwellings. Ee · The .7182 acres of parkland required for this development was previously dedicated with recordation of Tract 12870. Fe G~ That the City has reviewed the status of the School Facilities Agreements between the Irvine Company and the Tustin Unified School District. The East Tustin Specific Plan, EIR 85-2 with subsequently adopted supplements and -addenda, the impact of Amendment to Ve~ting Tentative Tract 14188 on School District facilities, and reviewed changes in State law, and finds, and determines that the impacts on School District facilities by approval of this map are adequately addressed. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. H · That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 1 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Resolution mo. 3325 JPage 2 I · That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage oF substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their habitat. Je That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements Proposed will not conflict with easement acquired by the public at. large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. K~ That the design of the subdivision or the types of improvement proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems. II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14188 to add three additional product types to the buildout of the previously approved development, subject to the Conditions contai.ned the Planning Commission Resolution No. 3324. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the. Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 13th day of February, 1995· Recording Secretary ~C~a'ir~rson STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY'OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, BARBARA REYES, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, , California; that Resolution No. 3325 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 13th day of February, 1995. Recording Secretary INITIAL STUDY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92680 ('714,) 573_3105 INITIAL STUDY I. BACKGROUND NameofProponent '~'T--~~5~_~ CZ~.j]z~¢? Address and Phone Number of Proponent Ct>sTZ~ t'~t:b~: c~, Date Check List Submitted ,~-T~. Iqq ¢ Agency Requiring Check List Name of Proposal, if applicable zS~b-~-~/l~ Tc~-I-T-1,~!88 ,,'d_ ~--'~ ~ c14-oB o ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Earth. Will the proposal result in: a: Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? [--1 ['-'-[ Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? ~[ [---1 Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ,~. [-'--[ The destruction, covering Or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either On or off the site? Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a fiver or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? [~ [---[ .b. C. eo YES MAYBE NO g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emission or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperatures, or any change in climate,' either locally or regionally? · 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes'in currents, or the course of direction of water movements} in either marine or fresh water? bo C° Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?. Alterations to the corn-se or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? go Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO 'h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? ExposUr~ of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species ofplants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare'or endangered species of animals? C, Introduction of new species of animals into an are.& or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing.noise levels? . o b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Light and Glare. will the proposal produc~ new light or glare? Land Use. will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present. or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate or use. of any natural resources? · b. Substantial depletion ofa,gy nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of UpSet: Will the proposal involve: ao bo A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? MAYBE NO I 1. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a.- Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to Waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. IncreaSe in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental.services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? · f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. W~II the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts cf fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the d_evelopment of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f'. Solid waste-and disposal? 17. Human Health: Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any.health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of peOple to potential health hazards? 18. Solid Waste. Will the proposal create additional solid waste requiring disposal by the City? Aesthetics. will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the propos~l result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . 20. 21. Recreation. will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? .. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in: · a. The alteration of or the destruction ora prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c. The potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? YES MAYBE NO 22. Mandatory Findings of Significance. YES MAYBE . NO a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? bo Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the 'future). Co Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment 'is signific~ant.) do Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? IH. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION SEE ATTACHMENT A PART III - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION ATTACHMENT A TIERED INITIAL STUDY RESPONSES AMENDMENT TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14188 AND DESIGN REVIEW 94-033 BACKGROUND In June of 1990, the City council approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14188 which authorized the subdivision.of an approximate 19- acre site to accommodate 57 single-family detached residential units. Subsequent to that approval, the developer recorded the Final Map and commenced construction of the development. To date, 16 of the 57 dwellings (28% of the project) have been completed. The applicant is requesting approval to add three new residential product types which will be added to the buildout of the project. The total number of dwelling units for this project will not be increased. The improvement of this property is governed by the regulations adopted by the East Tustin Specific Plan (ETSP) and the City's Grading Ordinance. Located in. Sector 8 of the ETSP, the subject site is bordered by Township Drive to the east, Lot 4 of Tract 12870 to the south which is currently vacant, Lot 26 of Tract 13627 to the north which is currently vacant, and unincorporated CoUnty territory to the west. This is a tiered initial study that is based on and incorporates by reference, the environmental analysis included in EIR 85-2, which was previously certified on March 17, 1986, and subseqUently amended with supplements and addenda for the ETSP. In conformance with CEQA, the purpose of this tiered initial study is to identify and focus the environmental analysis for the project on significant new engironmental impacts that were not previously considered in the Program EIR. EIR 85-2 as subsequently amended with supplements and addenda identified several impact categories where a Statement of · Overriding Consideration was adopted by the City for the entire ETSP area. .For the purposes of this initial study check list, these items have been checked "Yes" and an evaluation has been made to ensure that projects previously identified have not been intensified. Mitigation measures identified in the EIR to minimize the impacts that would be applicable to this .project. have been identified. EIR 85-2 as subsequently amended with supplements and addenda also identifie~ several impact categories where impacts could be lessened to a level of insignificance with the imposition of mitigation measures. Staff has reviewed each of these impact categories to be sure no new project impacts associated with the project would occur that were not identified in the Program EIR. For the purposes of this initial study check list, these items have been checked "No" and the mitigation measures identified in the Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 2 Program EIR that woUld be applicable'to this project that are included as part of the project have been identified. Impact categories not identified to have a potential impact in EIR 85-2 as subsequently amended with supplements and addenda have been also checked "No" and were also reviewed to ensure that no new impacts would be created by the project.' SinCe the ETSP included a variety of uses, ie: residential, community facilities, and commercial- use, some of the impact categories may not be applicable. 1. EARTH Items B, and C - "Yes": The project site is within the Specific Plan area, is approximately a 19 acre.site and is primarily flat. The site has been mass graded in accordance with Sector level map, Tract 12870, and subsequently graded to accommodate development of the property in accordance with the previously approved plans. Minor precise grading will be required to accommodate the proposed building footprints during construction. The City Council considered the benefits of the specific plan and balanced those benefits against the project's unavoidable effect. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was prepared to address necessary compromises for the overall benefit of the Specific Plan area and region. The project has been reviewed and will not worsen previously identified impacts on site and topography in the Program EIR. Applicable conditions of approval will be required to ensure that all grading activities to accommodate the buildout of the development incorporate mitigation measures identified in the certified EIR 85-2, its supplements and addendum. Items A,D,E,F, and G - "No": The subject development is within the Specific Plan area for which the certified EIR 85-2 identified impacts to the project site related to the necessary grading activity that would occur in order to accommodate the various types of development and the'resultant change 'to existing landfOrm and topography of the area. The site has been mass graded in accordance with the Sector level map, Tract 12870, and subsequently graded to accommodate development of the property in accordance with the previously approved plans. Applicable mitigation measures were identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and were implemented during grading of subject site. Minor precise grading will be required to accommodate the new building footprints during construction. This was an activity previously considered in the Program EIR. Applicable Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 ~January 9, 1995 Page 3 conditions of approval will be required to ensure that all grading activities that would occur to accommodate the buildout of the~ project incorporate mitigation measures identified in the certified-EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2 East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans ~itiqation/Monitoring Required: A detailed soils engineering report and grading plans for the site are required as a condition of apprOval to determine that all grading activities on the site in~orp0rate applicable mitigation measures, as per the certified~.EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum. · AIR Item A - "Yes":. The s~bject site is within the project area for which the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum, determined that the ETSP. will result in an incremental degradation of air quality in conjunction with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects. The City Council considered the benefits of the specific plan and balanced those benefits against the project's unavoidable effects. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was prepared to address necessary compromises for the overall.benefit of the Specific Plan area and region. The project has been reviewed and will not worsen previously identified impacts on Air Quality in the Program EIR. Conditions of approval will be required for the project to meet applicable mitigation measures, as required by the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum..Mitigation measures identified in EiR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum related to air quality impacts, such as encouraging the use of alternate transportation modes, and the encouraging of ridesharing will be incorporated as mitigation measures. Items B, and C - "No": The project site is within the Specific Plan area covered by the program EIR. The certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts tO the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects to air quality. The project has Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 4 been reviewed and will not worsen previously identified impacts on air quality in the Program,EIR. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to air quality such as encouraging the use of alternate transportation modes, the encouraging of ridesharing, and the inclusion of sidewalks and pedestrian paseos connecting the'project to other tracts to encourage the use of alternate transportation methods into either the. submitted plans or will be included in the conditions of approval for the subject project. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, .it's supplements and addendum 'East~Tustin Specific'Plan TT 14188 'Development Plans Mitigation/Monitorinq Required: Construction activity dust generation shall be reduced through regular watering as required by the SCAQMD Rule 403. Additionally, mitigation measures encouraging use of alternative transportation methods have been made available to the project as part of Tract 12870 the Sector level map. These measures identified in certified EIR 85-2, .it's supplements .and addendum, as applicable, have been incorporated into the project as submitted or will be incorporated as conditions of approval. · WATER Items B, C and F - "Yes": The subject project site is within the ETSP area for which the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to surface runoff, drainage flows, water quality and water percolation. The City Council considered the benefits of the specific plan and balanced'those benefits against the project's unavoidable effects. A Statement of Overriding.Considerations was adopted for the specific plan. The certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and.the resultant negative effects to water quality. The project has been reviewed and will not worsen previously identified impacts on water quality in the Program EIR. Applicable mitigation measures were identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and recommended for implementation. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to surface runoff, drainage flows, water quality and water percolation into Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 5 either the submitted plans or will be included in. the conditions of approval, where applicable. Items A, D, E, G, H and I - "No": The proposed buiidout of the existing development is within the Specific Plan area. The certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects to water quality. The project_has been reviewed and will not worsen previously identified impacts on water quality in the Program EIR. Applicable mitigation measures were identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and recommended for implementation. Mitigation measures identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum related to changes to water course direction, amount of surface water, discharge into surface waters, ground waters, reduction of amount of water, and exposure to water hazards would also be implemented at the time subsequent specific development plans are considered. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City ~ode Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures identified in certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum, including plans to accommodate increase runoff flows associated with the proposed development by incorporating on- site and off-site drainage improvements, providing erosion control measures and developing appropriate pollution control plans have been incorporated into the project as submitted or will be incorporated as conditions of approval. Erosion control measures will be developed and incorporated into final grading plans for the project to minimize potential increases in erosion and sediment transport during the short-term construction phases. Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and bR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 6 4. PLANT LIFE Items A, B, C and D - "No": The project site is presently under construction with 16 of the 57 units completed. The ..... c~-rti-f'ie-d EiR-8-5-~-2~-if,-s---s~-p~i-e~-en~---~d ~-dd~ndumi~.d~ntified impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects to plant life. Applicable mitigation measures were identified in EIR 85-2, · it's supplements and 'addendum and recommended for implementation. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to plant life into either the submitted plans or will be included.in the conditions of approval, where applicable, for the subject projectl No additional impacts would occur beyoqd those identified 'in the Program. EIR. ... Sources:-.Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures require revegetation on graded and cut-and-fill areas where structures or improvements are not constructed, with consideration given to the use of drought-tolerant plant materials, such as the eucalyptus, brisbane box, hawthorne, bougainvillea, and pittosporum. These mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project as submitted, or will be incorporated as conditions of approval. · ANIMAL LIFE Items A through D - "No": The project site is within the East Tustin Specific Plan area. The certified EIR 8.5-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to the ETSP related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects to animal life. Applicable mitigation measures were identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and recommended, for implementation. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to animal life into either the submitted plans or would be included in the conditions of approval, where applicable, for the subject project. No additional impacts would occUr beyond those identified in the Program EIR. Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 7 Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and a~dendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans Mitiqation/Monitoring Required: Those measures identified in certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum, including .providing'open space in the site plan, revegetation of the site, revegetation on graded and cut-and-fill areas where structures or improvements are not constructed, with consideration given to the use of drought-tolerant plant materials, such as the eucalyptus, brisbane box, hawthorne, bougainvillea, and pittosporum have been incorporated, into the project as submitted or would be incorporated as conditions of approval. · NOISE Item A - "Yes": Development of the site would result in short-term construction noise impacts, and a long-term increase in the ambient noise levels in and around the project site. These impacts were originally considered as part of certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum. The City Council considered the benefits of the ETSP original program EIR and balanced those benefits against the project's unavoidable effects. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for the specific plan. The project has been reviewed and will not worsen impacts previously identified in the Program EIR. Mitigation measures addressing the acoustic environment were ~identified in the program EIR, and are included in the submitted project, or would be conditions of approval. Item B - "No": The project site is within the Specific Plan area and the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects of noise. Consequently, mitigation measures were identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and recommended for implementation. This proposal has incorporated tho. se measures related to noise into either the submitted plans or would be included in the conditions of approval, where applicable, for the subject project. No additional impacts would occur beyond those identified in the Program EIR. Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and'DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 8 SoUrces: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code certified EIR 85r~2,~i~,s. supp!ements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans Mitiqation/Monitorinq Required: Mitigation measures identified by the program EIR include measures to identify exterior noise levels identified with the project in an acoustical analysis construction of barriers used within the project~ site such as berms, walls or a combination of both. Landscaping materials and setbacks from the roadway are also included in the site design as mitigation measures. Interior noiSe'imPacts where determined to be greater than the level permitted by the Noise Ordinance will~ be mitigated by providing improved noise rated windows. In addition, the City's Noise Ordinance No. 828 has specific requirements in regard to construction noise. Those measures identified in certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and the City of Tustin Ordinance No. 828, have been incorporated into the project as submitted or would be incorporated as conditions of approval. · LIGH? AND GLARE "Yes": The proposed buildout of the existing development would create additional light in the area. Lighting'from pedestrian and street lights, decorative wall lights and outdoor private area lights will have a significant impact. The project site is within the Specific Plan area .in which the program EIR addresses the impact of ·development and the resultant negative effects from light and glare, and the City Council considered the benefits of the specific plan and balanced--those benefits against the project's unavoidable · effects. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for the specific plan. However, mitigation measures were identified-in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and. addendum and recommended for implementation. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to light and glare into the submitted plans. The mitigation measures would also be included in the conditions of approval for the project. The project has also been reviewed and willL not worsen impacts previously identified in the Program EIR. Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 9 Sources: Field Verification~ Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and aadendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans Mitigation/Monitorinq Required: Conditions of approval for the project require that a lighting plan be submitted for the project, and that no lights that create any glare or have a negative impact'on adjoining properties shall be permitted. e LAND USE "No": The Project site is within the Specific Plan for Which the .certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects of land use. The site is designated as Low Density Residential by the land use plan. The impacts to .the site by a Low Density development allowing up to 4 dwelling units per acre was considered by certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and amendments. However, the'existing development was approved at approximately 3 dwelling units per acre and. would, therefore, have less impact on the site then the project anticipated by the Program EIR. The program 'EIR .identified that the development of the project site would result in the gradual / . conversion of existing open space into urban use. The City Council considered the benefits of the specific plan and balanced those benefits against the project's unavoidable effects. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for the specific plan. However, mitigation measures identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum have been incorporated 'into the project or would be required as conditions of approval which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the program EIR. The project will not worsen impacts previously identified in the Program EIR. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 10 Mitiqation/Monitoring Required: Adherence to and compliance with the guidelines and provisions of the ETSP, which address building height, building setbacks, parking requirements, and other site development standards, would ensure that the buildout of the existing development complies With mitigation measures specified in the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum. . NATURAL RESOURCES Items A and B - "No": The project site is within the East Tustin Specific Plan area and was anticipated to be designated as Low Density Residential by the land use plan, allowing up to 4 dwelling units per acre. The impacts to the site by a Low Density development was considered by certified EIR 85-2 its supplements and amendments. However, the existing development was previously approved at approximately 3 dwelling units per acre and would, therefore, have less impact on the site then the.project anticipated by the Program EIR. The certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to the ETSP related' to the proposed' development and the resultant negative effects to natural resources. Applicable mitigation measures were identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and recommended for implementation. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to natural resources into either the submitted plans or would be included in the conditions of approval, where applicable, for the subject project. No additional impacts would occur beyond those identified in the Program EIR. Sources: Field Verification Submitted. Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188.Development Plans Mitiqation/Monitorinq Required: Mitigation measures identified by the program EIR include measures to provide open area~ in the site plan where feasible and to provide vegetation that includes drought tolerant materials such as eucalyptus, brisbane box, hawthorne, bougainvillea, pittosporum and revegetating graded and cut and'filled areas where feasible. These mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project as submitted, or will be incorporated as conditions of approval. Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 11 10. RISK OF UPSET Items A and B - "No": The project site is within the Specific Plan area for-which the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified no impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects from risk of upset. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans °Miti~ation/Monitorinq Required: None Required. 11. POPULATION "Yes": The existing, development includes a total of 57 dwelling units, 16 of which have been completed to date. The Low .Density designation would permit up to approximately 76 dwelling units pursuant to the ETSP, which allows a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre on the subject site. The existing development as previously approved is developed at approximately 3 dwelling units per acre. As a result, the project will not worsen impacts previously identified in the Program EIR. The project site is within the Specific Plan area for which the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects to population. The City Council considered the benefits of the specific plan and balanced those benefits against the project's unavoidable effects. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for the specific plan. Consequentty,-mitigation measures were identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and recommended for implementation. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to population into either the submitted plans or would be included in the conditions of approval, where applicable, for the subject project. AttaChment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 12 Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan ~ TT 14188 Development Plans Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Adherence to and compliance with the guidelines and provisions of the ETSP, which address building height, building setbacks, parking requirements, and other site development standards, would ensure that the buildout of the existing development complies with mitigation measures specified in the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum. 12. HOUSING "Yes": The existing development includes a total of 57 dwelling units, 16 of which have been completed to date. The Low Density designation would permit up to approximately 76 dwelling units pursuant to the ETSP, which allows a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre on the subject site. The existing development as previously approved is developed at approximately 3 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, the project will not worsen impacts previously identified in the Program EIR. The project site is within the specific plan area, 'and the Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplementS and addendum identified impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects to housing. The City Council considered the benefits of the specific plan and balanced those benefits against the project's unavoidable effects. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for the· specific plan. ~onsequently, applicable mitigation measures were identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and recommended for implementation where feasible. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to housing into either the submitted plans or would be included in the conditions of approval, where applicable, for the subject property. - Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City'Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT. 14188 Development Plans Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 13 Mitiqation/Monitoring Required: Adherence to and compliance with the guidelines and provisions of the ETSP, which address building height, building setbacks, parking requirements, and other site development standards, would ensure ~hat ~he buildout of the existing development complies with mitigation measures specified in the certified EIR 85-2, it's Supplements and addendum. 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION Item A - "Yes": The existing development was approved with .two private streets that access Township Drive, also a private street. The subject project is located within the private portion of Township Drive. 'Access to Township Drive is restricted by vehicular gates· located at Township Drive at Tustin Ranch Road and Rawlings Way at Township Drive. On-site circulation will consist of a 36 foot wide private streets which include parking on both sides of the street. The program EIR identifies that ETSP will generate increased traffic in the vicinity. The City Council considered the benefits of the specific plan and balanced those benefits against the project's unavoidable effects and chose to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Applicable mitigati6n measures were incorporated into the ETSP, including a circulation plan intended to provide an adequate circulation system for specific.plan traffic, and mitigate impacts on the existing circulation system. Based on review of project and program EIR, the project will not worsen previously identified impacts on the transportation/circulation in the Program EIR. This proposal has incorporated applicable measUres related to transportation/circulation into either the submitted plans or will be included in the conditions of approval, where applicable, for the subject project. Items B, C, D, E, and F - "No": The project site is within the Specific Plan area for which the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects to transportation/circulation, including: the effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking; substantial impact upon existing transportation systems; alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods; alterations to waterborne, ~rail or air traffic; and increase-in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians. As all required parking would be provided on Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 14 site, there would be no demand for additional parking. As the surrounding roads have been designed to accommodate peak traffic demands the proposed project would not have a substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, as -di~C~-SS-e-d-ab0v~-nof~-would~-it'impactthe~presentlmpatterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods. As the site plan is designed to the specifications of the ~ETSP, and the Tustin City Code, traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians would be mitigated. No additional impacts would occur beyond those identified in'the Program EIR. Mitigation measures were identified in-EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and recommended for implementation. This proposal has incorporated 'those measures related to transpgrtatiOn/ circulation into either the submitted plans or would -~be included in the conditions of approval, where applicable, for the subject, project. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin .Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans Mitiqation/Monitoring Required: Conditions of approval require that the private street system and residential development on the site shall meet the requirements of the ETSP, and the Tustin City Code. Also, a condition of approval requires that a street improvement plan be provided for all construction within the public right-of-way. Furthermore, adherence to and compliance with the guidelines and provisions of the East Tustin Specific Plan' will ensure that the development of the subject project complies with mitigation measures specified in the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES Items A, B, C, D, E, and F, - "Yes": Implementation of this project will result in an increase in the demand for and utilization of public services; such. as fire protection, police protection, infrastructure maintenance- and other governmental services, schools, parks and recreational facilities, however, impacts to public services were originally considered as part of EIR 85-2, its supplements and addendum. The project will not, however, worsen impacts Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 15 previously identified in the Program EIR as the impacts identified by the Program EIR anticipated that the site would be designated as Low Density by the land use plan, allowing up to 4 dwelling units per acre,, resulting in a maximum of approximately 76 units. The existing development includes a total of 57 units with a density of approximately 3 units per acre. The- subject site is within the Specific Plan area for which the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified'impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects to public services. The City Council considered the benefits of the specific plan and balanced those benefits against the project's ~unavoidable effects. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for the specific plan. Additionally, mitigation measures were identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and recommended for implementation. This proposal has incorporated those measUres related to public services into either the submitted plans or will be included in the conditions of approval, where applicable, for the subject project. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum · East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans Mitiqation/Monitorinq Required: Measures identified in certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum, such as; stating the project sponsor shall work closely with the Police Department, the Orange County Fire Department and other' governmental services to ensure adequate security, safety and services for the project; a street improvement plan required for ail constructiOn in the public right-of-way; and a parkland dedication for this project have been incorporated into the project. These measures identified in the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum, as applicable have been incorporated into the project as submitted or will be incorporated as conditions of approval. Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 16 15. ENERGY Items A and B - ,,Yes,,: The ETSP will increase the demand for and consumption of energy. The project site is within the ' SpecifiC Plan area for -which certified EIR. 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects to energy. However, the project will not worsen impacts previously identified in the Program EIR as the impacts identified by the Prog.ram EIR anticipated that the site would be designated as Low Density by the land use plan, allowing up to 4 dwelling units per acre, resulting in a maximum of approximately'76 units. The existing development includes a total of 57 units with a density of approximately 3 units per acre. The City Council considered the benefits of the specific plan and balanced' those benefits against the project's unavoidable effects. A Statement of Overriding Considerations. was adopted for the specific plan. Consequently, mitigation measures were identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and recommended for implementation. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to energy into. either the submitted plans or will be included in the conditions of approval, where applicable, for the subject project. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans Mitiqation/Monitorinq Required: Mitigation measures. identified in certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum, require that building'construction shall comply with the Energy Conservation Standards set forth in Title 24 of the California Administrative COde, that energy conservation techniques be considered, that insulation of walls, ceiling and floors be required, and that energy.efficient lighting be used. These mitigation measures related to energy, as applicable, have been incorporated into the project as submitted or will be incorporated as conditions of approval. Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 17 16. UTILITIES Items A through F - "Yes": The ETSP will increase the demand for utilities. However, the project will not worsen'impacts previously identified in the Program EIR. The subject site is within the Specific Plan area for which the certified EIR 85- 2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative-effects to utilities. The project will not, however, worsen impacts identified by the Program EIR as the impacts identified by the Program EIR anticipated that the site would be designated as Low Density by the land use plan, allowing up to 4 dwelling units per acre, resulting in a maximum of approximately 76 units. The existing development includes'a total of 57 units with a density of approximately 3 units per acre. The City Council considered the benefits of the specific plan and balanced those benefits against the project's unavoidable effects on the use of utilities. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for the specific plan. Mitigation measures were identified in EIR 85- 2, it's supplements and addendum and recommended for implementation where feasible. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to utilities into either the submitted plans or will be included in the conditions of approval, where applicable, for the subject project. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans. Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans Mitiqation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures identified in certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum~ r¢quire that water conservation methods as required by .state .law, energy conservation standards and building construction techniques as set forth in 'Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, energy conservation techniques, insulation of walls, ceiling and floors, and that energy efficient lighting be implemented to mitigate potential effects on utilities. These mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project as submitted or will be incorporated as conditions of approval. Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 18 17. HUMAN HEALTH Items A and B - "No": The project site is within the Specific Plan area for which certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendumidentified impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects to human health. Consequently, mitigation measures were identified 'in EIR 85-2, it's supplements, and addendum and recommended for implementation. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to human health into either the submitted 'plans or will be included in the conditions of' approval, where applicable, for the subject project. No additional impacts would occur beyond those identified in the'Program EIR. -. Sources:-... Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans Mitiqation/Monitoring Required: Those measures identified in certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum, related to human health such as; adherence to and compliance with the guidelines and provisions of the ETSP, which address building height, building setbacks, open space requirements, parking requirements, and other site development standards; adherence to the Uniform Building Code and all applicable city, state and federal, codes as applicable; and compliance with the City of Tustin Noise Ordinance have been incorporated into the project as submitted or will be incorporated as conditions of approval. 18. sOLID WASTE "No": The development site is within the Specific Plan area for which the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negatiVe effects of solid waste. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to solid waste .into either the submitted plans or will be included in the conditions of aPproval, where applicable, for the subject project. Pursuant to the City of Tustin Municipal Code, the subject project will be required to contract for trash removal services with the City's contracted Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 19 hauler. The solid waste product is transported by the hauler to the Material Recovery Facility (MRF). Once at the MRF, the waste is manually and mechanically separated and the recyclable materials are recovered. This program has been implemented by the City in effort to meet the State requirements identified in the Source Reduction and Recycling Element · related to the 25 and 50 percent diversion requirements. It is anticipated that the amount of solid waste will be accommodated within the City's existing solid waste handling programs and will not have a significant impact on the City's Solid Waste Handling services. The City's existing solid waste handling program and contracts have been established to accommodate the development and expansion of new businesses and residential developments within the.°City. No additional impacts would occur beyond those identified in the Program EIR. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City ~ode Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan Great Western Reclamation Inc. TT 14188'Development Plans Mitiqation/Monitorinq Required: Those measures identified in certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum, related to the removal of solid waste, have been incorporated into the project as submitted or will be incorporated as conditions of approval. Mitigation measures identified in EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum related to solid waste will be conditioned with this project and will also be implemented at the time subsequent specific development plans are considered. These mitigation measures would include the future to contract for a fee with the'City' contracted solid waste hauler. 19. AESTHETICS "No": The three additional product types proposed to be added to the buildout of the project include similar architectural detailing, finish colors and finish materials to the existing and previously approved units for this development.. Design Review of the project has been completed by the Community Development Department, and has been recommended for approval Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9, 1995 Page 20 as the proposed additional product types would appear compatible with the existing units. The project is within the Specific Plan area and the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to the 'project site related to the Proposed development and the resultant negative effects to aesthetics. Consequently, mitigation measures~were identified through design review in conjunction with EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum and recommended for implementation. This proposal has incorporated those measures related to aesthetics into either the submitted plans or will be included in the conditions of approval, where applicable, for the subject project. No additional impacts would occur beyond those identified in the Program EIR. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin'City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans · Mitiga~ion/Monitorinq Required: Those measures identified in certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum which relate to this development such as those stating that grading reflect the natural topography of the site, and architectural-and site design reflect the Urban Design Guidelines section of the ETSP have been incorporated into the project. 20. RECREATION "No": The subject site is within the Specific Plan area and the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified impacts to the project site related to the proposed develOpment and the resultant negative effects to recreation. Park~'~nd ~dedication of .7182 acres has been previously provided from the development with the recordation of Tract 12870,.the Sector level map, to adequately provide parkland as required by the ETSP. Furthermore, all parks identified by the ETSP have been reserved for the purpose of providing recreation in the ETSP. No additional impacts would occur . beyond those identified in the Program EIR. Attachment A - Initial Study Amendment to VTT 14188 and DR 94-033 January 9,. 1995 Page 21 Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan TT 14188 Development Plans Mitiqation/Monitoring Required: None Required. 21. CULTURAL RESOURCES Items A throuqh D - "No": The subject site is within the Specific Plan area and the certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum identified .impacts to the project site related to the proposed development and the resultant negative effects to cultural resources. This project is not within an-area identified as an archaeological site. Sources: Field Verification Submitted Plans Tustin City .Code Certified EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum East Tustin Specific Plan Tt 14188 Development Plans' Mitiqation/Monitoring Required: None Required. 22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Items A, B, C and D - "No": The project in and of itself will not cause negative impacts to wildlife habitat nor achieve any short-term 'environmental goals, nor have impacts which are potentially individually limited but are cumulatively considerable and could potentially have an indirect adverse impact 'on .human beings. The program EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum, addressed all of these concerns and this project is fully within the scope of that discussion. Source: Submitted plans As previously stated Mitigation/Monitoring Required: As previously stated. PART IV - DETERMINATION INITIAL STUDY RESPONSES AMENDMENT TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14188 AND DESIGN REVIEW 94-033 On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project ~AS utilized all feasible mitigation measures as identified in Final Environmental Impact Report 85-2 certified on March 17, 1986, and subsequently adopted supplements and addenda. The program EIR 85-2, it's supplements and addendum for the' East Tustin Specific Plan is adequate to serve as the program EIR as significant impacts were identified and corresponding mitigation measures were recommended to be incorporated into the approval process for individual projects. Therefore, no additional documenta~ is required. DATE ~.'~ q, [qq~ SIGNATURE/' )k~_~. ~ TITLE ~1 ,~ ]~- ,~~ DF :br:TT14188.ENV 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RESOLUTION NO. 95-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, FINDING THAT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (FINAL EIR 85-2, AS MODIFIED BY SUBSEQUENTLY ADOPTED SUPPLEMENTS AND ADDENDA) IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROGRAM EIR FOR AMENDMENT TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14188 AND DESIGN REVIEW 94-033 AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I · The City Council finds and determines as.follows: A· That Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14188 and Design Review 94'033 and respective development plans are considered "projects', pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act; and $. That the projects are covered by a previously certified Final Environmental Impact Report for the East Tustin Specific Plan which serves as a Program EIR for the proposed project. II. The East Tustin Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Rep°rt~(85-2), previously certified on March 17, 1986 as modified by subsequently adopted supplements and addenda, was considered prior to approval of this project. The City Council hereby finds: this project is within the scope of the East Tustin Specific Plan previously approved; the effects of this project, relating to grading, drainage, circulation, public services and utilities, were examined in the Program EIR. All feasible mitigation measures and alternatives deVeloped in the Program EIR are incorporated into this project. The Final EIR, is therefore determined to be adequate to serve as a Program EIR for this project and satisfied all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Further, the City Council finds the project involves no potential for any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on wildlife resources; and, therefore, makes a De Minimis Impact Finding related to AB 3158, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990. 28 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 95 26 Page 2 Applicable mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR have been incorporated into this project which mitigates any potential significant environmentaleffects thereof. The mitigation measures are identified as Conditions on Exhibit A of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3325 recommending approval of Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract 14188 and Exhibit A of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3324 apprOving Design Review 94-033. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City' Council, held on the 6th day of March, 1995. Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk THOMAS R. SALTARELLI MAYOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) SS MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 95-26 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 6th day of March, 1995, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 RESOLUTION NO. 95-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14188. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: · I · The City CounCil finds and determines as follows: ae That Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14188 was submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council by Standard Pacific for consideration; and Be That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for said Amendment by the Planning Commission on January 9, 1995 and continued to January 23, 1995 and February 13, 1995, and by the City Council on March 6, 1995. Ce That an Environmental Impact Report (EIR 85-2 for the East Tustin Specific Plan) has been certified in conformance with~ the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act for the subject project area. De Ee That the PrOPosed subdivision is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan, adopted East Tustin Specific Plan, Development Agreement and Subdivision Map Act as it pertains to the development of single family .detached dwellings. The .7182 acres of parkland required for this development was previously dedicated with recordation of Tract 12870. F. G · That the City has reviewed the status of the School Facilities Agreements between the· Irvine Company and the'Tustin Unified School District. The East Tustin Specific Plan, EIR 85-2 with subsequently adopted supplements and addenda,' the impact of Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract 14188 on School District facilities, and reviewed changes in State law, and finds and determines that the impacts on School District facilities by approval of this map are adequately addressed. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. H. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 95-27 Page 2 I · That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their habitat. Je That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements proposed will not conflict with easement acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.~ Ke That the design of the subdivision or the types of improvement proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems. II. The City Council hereby .approves.Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14188 toadd three additional product types to the buildout of the previously approved development, subject to the Conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3324. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 6th day of March, 1995. Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk THOMAS R. SALTARELLi~ MAYOR RAT]FICATION OF DEMANDS NO. 2 3-6-95 RECOMMENDAT I ON: That the following demands listing be confirmed and approved as submitted in accordance with Government Code Section 37208 as recommended by the Finance Department. TyDe of Listing General Demands (Accounts Payable) Date/Amount 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 Total $375,872.74~arrant Run -15.00%~oid Ck#52538 -99.00~'Coid Ck#57505 -1,200.00~W~id Ck#58563 $374,558.74 The Director of Finance has certified that the above listing is in accordance with the approved budget with the following exceptions- Exceptions: NONE BACKGROUND: In September of 1972, the City Council approved the use of Government Code Section 37208 which expedites payment of City payroll and accounts payable obligations which are in accordance with an approved budget. Under this procedure, each purchase is not only reviewed at the time the purchase order is issued, but is reviewed by the Finance Department prior to payment of the invoice from the vendor to insure that it conforms to the approved budget. The City Council is then provided a listing at each Council meeting of the payroll and general warrants issued since the last report so that it can inspect and confirm these warrants. AFFIDAVIT OF DEMANDS: In accordance with Government Code Section 37208, I hereby certify that the above demands listing (accounts payable of the City) have been found to conform to the approved budget except as noted and have been paid. These demands are hereby submitted for City Council inspection and confirmation- Listings: TOTAL $374,558.74 Exceptions: Date: FEBRUARY 17 , 1995 D~rector of F~nance NO. 2 3-6-95 RATIFICATION OF DEMANDS RECOMMENDATION- That the following demands listing be confirmed and approved as submitted in accordance with Government Code Section 37208 as recommended by the Finance Department- Type of Listing pate/Amount General Demands (Accounts Payable) 2/24/95 2/24/95 2/24/95 Total $689,6~9.67 Warrant Run -340.00 Void Ck#58478 -1,565.58 Void Ck#58779 $687,784.09 The Director of Finance has certified that the above listing is in accordance with the approved budget with the following exceptions- Exceptions- NONE BACKGROUND' In September of 1972, the City Council approved the use of Government Code Section 37208 which expedites payment of City payroll and accounts payable obligations which are in accordance with an approved budget. Under this procedure, each purchase is not' only reviewed at the time the purchase order is issued, but is reviewed by the Finance Department prior to payment of the invoice from the vendor to insure that'it conforms to the approved budget. The City Council is then provided a listing at each Council meeting of-the payroll and general warrants issued since the last report so that it can inspect and confirm these warrants. AFFIDAVIT OF DEMANDS- In accordance with Government Code Section 37208, I hereby certify that the above demands listing (accounts payable of the City) have been found to conform to the approved budget except as noted and have been paid. These demands are hereby submitted for City Council inspection and confirmation- Listings- TOTAL $687 , 784 . 09 Exceptions- Date: FEBRUARY 2 4 , 19 9 5 , x.~ Director of Finance