Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT
Agenda Item 5 Reviewed: ACIENDA REPORT City Manager Finance Director N/A MEETING DATE: JANUARY 19, 2016 TO. JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGED FROM. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT SUMMARY. This agenda report transmits the John Wayne Airport (.AWA) Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for the third quarter of 2015. The average noise level measured at Tustin's monitoring station (NMS 10N), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way (Figure 1), remained consistent with prior quarters during this third quarter reporting period. Average noise levels during the third quarter remained well below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file this report. FISCAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact. JWA Noise Report January 19, 2016 Page 2 CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC FLAN: Staff's analysis and report of the quarterly John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Report falls under Goal D of the Strategic Plan pertaining to strong community and regional relationships. The City of Tustin strives to Work collaboratively With agencies both Within and outside Tustin on issues of mutual interest and concern, and in this instance, on matters of airport traffic and noise. DISCUSSION: Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, JWA staff prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their website. Attached is the quarterly report for the third quarter of 2015, which includes the months of July through September. An overview of the information contained within the JWA Noise Report includes measured noise levels, and an analysis of noise complaints. Measured Noise Levels Aircraft noise is most noticeable during airplane takeoffs and landings primarily due to engine noise. Although engines produce a significant amount of aircraft noise, many other factors may influence the perception of noise including: proximity; weather — in bad weather engine noise is reflected off of the atmosphere making jets appear louder than on clear days; routes; non-scheduled operations which could include military or private aircraft; emergencies; and, weight — a heavier load may affect an aircraft's rate of ascent. During the third quarter of 2015, the average CNEL at Tustin's monitoring station on Reneta Way was 55.2 dB. This is .2 dB lower than the average of the previous quarter (Q-2: April through June 2015). The average noise level for this quarter is very similar to the average from the previous four quarters, which is 54.9 dB. Figure 2 provides a visualization of Tustin's CNEL levels for each month during the third quarter of 2015. Daoly Community Noise Equivalent Leve0s QCNEQ in Tustin - July through September 2015 ___ X10 July J 30 August September 20 -Noise Impact Area Level (65 dB) 10 0 1 11., 1: 19 21 23 21, 27 2Q 31 Date Hgurs 2 JWA Noise Report January 19, 2016 Page 3 Noise Complaints The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and other sources. Throughout all of the Orange County monitoring area, noise complaints increased by 113 percent during the third quarter of 2015 in comparison to the second quarter of 2015. This number represents a 37 percent decrease in comparison to the same quarter last year. It should be noted that several of the complaints were made by the same household in the City of Santa Ana. During the third quarter of 2015, there were three (3) Tustin area complaint calls, which is the same number of complaints as the previous quarter. Tustin staff has outreached to JWA to gather further details on the nature of the complaints, and to understand how JWA responds to these complainants. The breakdown of the three (3) complaints from the third quarter of 2015 is as follows: one (1) complaint was regarding the frequency of flights; one (1) complaint was regarding general loud aircraft noise; and, one (1) complaint was regarding late night operations. Two (2) of these concerns were left on John Wayne Airport's voicemail system, and the complainants did not request follow-up from JWA staff. One (1) concern was received via phone -call, and JWA staff spoke to the concerned party and logged the complaint. To provide an understanding of the trend in Tustin area complaints throughout the years, a chart displaying the number of noise complaints for the past five years is displayed below (f=igure 3). Generally, there is a noticeable increase in noise complaints during the second and third quarters, which further supports the theory that an increase in complaints tends to occur during the warmer months of spring and summer. Overall, the number of complaints has not reached more than twelve (12) complaints in a single quarter during this five-year reporting period. Nc!se CornpWnts - Tustin 14 6 . _ . -------- --.-- Z 4 — --- - - ----- -- — 2 Quarter/Year JWA Noise Report January 19, 2016 Page 4 Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at John Wayne Airport unless otherwise directed by the City Council. The public are additionally welcome to participate in John Wayne Airport's Quarterly meetings held by the Access and Noise Office. The next quarterly meeting will be held on March 9, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. in the Eddie Martin Administration Building located at 3160 Airway Avenue in Costa Mesa. Adrianne DiLeva-Johnson Senior Management Assistant �.Y 0(iiabe'Ith A. Binsack Director of Community Development Attachment: John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for July 1, 2015, through September 30, 2015 ATTACHMENT John Wayne Aurport Muse Abatement QuarrteMy Report for Judy 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015 (TMrd Quarter) NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUAI1g'I['IERLZY REPORT For the period: July 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015 ]Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOffSIE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA Cafforanaa Administrative Code TitRe 21, Chapter 2.5, SuubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Barry A. Ro ndi neIllla, AAE/CAE Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 171 st Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS -1 S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS -2S: 20162 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS -4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS -5S: 324 '/z Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS -7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS -8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS -9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS -ION: 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (October 1, 2014 - September 30, 2015). The Figure 2 infonnation was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". - 1 - Figure 1 '� _ � y:1 ti•'° r Jam'. - + 40 �. ►�. .� a � • . 1 ,,+'r � " • 911. e' � '°4y, \, of or 14 AO ,0 C - © ar or IOAI- lk i n e, -V _� 1 . ' '�• � < a _ • F♦, � ` ,,a ✓ µms= ., .�:'��- ',, M 1 . ? _♦ r , IF � _ r _ * l �ly � . ,a+',�►. * r ,/tea` •' „�� M � # + ,•`4't ' •, ,®� k,' �+',, � +moi; . � ~•� y r•� 110IL We pr *01 f ` d f OV IL w � � .r .•!.i . .., d� •yam..-• t 1 ,,. �' �. !�� _ ,/ •- � t �.� ':: —+ f �T' a � ' x .>' ' . a.� ...... ',MI + 1L��Y1 �� r<+C` rr • "' �1E AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS July - Septempber 2015 Period Air Carriers GA Jet (1) Total Jet Prop Operations (2) Average Daily Jet Operations July 7,550 0 2,535 22,516 325 August 7,534 0 2,505 22,878 323 September 7,113 0 2,388 22,278 316 Third Quarter 22,197 0 7,428 67,672 321 Twelve Months 10/01/14 - 09/30/15 82,906 0 27,442 259,256 302 NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. ACOUSTICAL INSULATION PROGRAM Four hundred eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program, which closed in December 2009. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation Programs. Seventy-five dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights remain in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within 65 dB CNEL contour). TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (July 1, 2015 - September 30, 2015) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During July 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015, the Office received 311 complaints from local citizens. This is a 113.0% increase from the 146 complaints received last quarter. It is a 37.0% decrease from the 494 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 3 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. SEE FIGURE HISTOGRAM BYCOMMUNITY O24681012141618—?022����������������'4 Note: 77% of the complaints from Santa Ana were from one household. Island BalbraPeninsula Bayshores Bays|deVU|age [m`�'na Del Mar Costa Mesa Coto de Caza Dover Shores Eastb|uff Fountain Valley HuntinntcnBeach Irvine La Haba Heights LaderaRanch Laguna Beach c LemonHta � c� Lido Isle NevvpmtBeach Newport Coast NmfthTustin 0range O/'anOe Pa/tAcrey PanoramaHeiOhts Santa Ana Santa Ana Heights Tustin Un|voraityPad FIGURE HISTOGRAM BYCOMMUNITY O24681012141618—?022����������������'4 Note: 77% of the complaints from Santa Ana were from one household. TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 10/01/14 through 09/30/15 Values in db at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION Oct 2014 66.9 65.8 65.6 58.7 57.4 59.1 55.1 66.9 42.9 54.9 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Nov 2014 65.7 64.3 64.8 57.7 56.4 58.9 54.4 66.3 42.9 54.1 # Days 30 20 30 30 30 30 30 30 23 30 Dec 2014 66.6 65.3 65.8 58.8 58.1 60.4 55.6 66.9 #N/A 54.7 # Days 1 311 24 311 31 31 31 31 311 0 2 Q-4 2014 66.4 65.3 65.4 58.4 57.4 59.5 55.0 66.7 42.9 54.5 # Days 92 75 92 92 92 92 92 92 54 63 Jan 2015 66.1 64.9 65.1 58.3 57.2 59.3 54.9 66.0 42.7 53.8 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 26 30 Feb 2015 66.3 65.4 65.3 58.6 57.4 59.2 55.1 66.6 43.9 54.8 # Days 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 25 28 Mar 2015 66.5 65.4 65.6 58.7 57.2 59.1 55.2 66.8 42.2 54.4 4 Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Q-12015 66.3 65.2 65.3 58.5 57.3 59.2 55.1 66.5 43.0 54.3 # Days 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 80 89 Apr 2015 66.6 65.7 65.3 59.0 57.7 58.9 56.0 67.3 43.7 55.1 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 24 30 May 2015 66.8 65.8 65.4 59.4 57.8 59.1 56.3 67.6 42.4 55.8 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 31 Jun 2015 67.0 66.0 65.7 59.2 57.3 59.3 55.3 67.5 42.3 55.3 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 28 30 Q-2 2015 66.8 65.8 65.5 59.2 57.6 59.1 55.9 67.4 42.8 55.4 # Days 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 80 91 Jul 2015 67.3 66.2 66.1 59.6 58.2 59.9 55.9 67.6 41.8 55.6 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Aug 2015 67.3 66.2 _ 66.0 59.3 57.9 59.4 55.7 67.5 44.3 55.0 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Sep 2015 67.3 66.1 65.9 58.8 57.6 59.0 55.7 67.1 42.7 54.8 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 30 Q-3 2015 67.3 66.2 66.0 59.3 57.9 59.5 55.7 67.4 43.1 55.2 # Days 92 92 92 92 921 921 92 92 83 92 Q-4 2014 thru Q-3 2015 Total 66.7 1 65.7 65.6 58.9 57.5 59.3 55.5 67.0 42.9 54.9 # Days 365 348 365 365 365 365 365 365 297 335 Q-3 2014 thru Q-2 2015 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total 66.6 65.6 65.4 58.6 57.5 59.2 55.3 66.9 42.8 54.9 # Days 363 348 365 365 365 360 364 365 303 335 Change from Previous 4 Quarters 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.21 0.11 0.1 0.0 6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION July 2015 Date NMS Site 1S I 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION 1 67.7 66.7 66.6 59.6 58.4 59.9 55.8 67.9 45.3 55.3 2 67.5 66.5 66.4 59.8 58.5 60.1 56.6 68.0 44.6 55.7 3 66.2 65.2 64.9 58.1 56.8 58.2 53.8 65.8 39.4 53.3 4 63.8 62.8 62.3 56.0 54.4 55.6 50.8 63.6 36.8 52.4 5 66.6 65.7 65.2 59.0 57.6 59.0 55.1 67.8 #N/A 56.6 6 67.5 66.6 66.3 60.2 58.7 60.3 56.0 68.1 35.0 56.7 7 67.31 66.4 66.2 59.6 58.0 59.6 55.7 68.0 39.9 56.8 8 67.3 66.2 65.9 60.4 58.7 60.0 56.0 68.2 #N/A 56.5 9 67.7 66.8 66.1 60.0 58.8 60.2 56.6 68.0 43.9 55.8 10 67.4 66.7 66.1 59.9 59.0 60.0 56.9 67.9 38.0 56.0 11 65.4 64.6 64.1 58.3 56.7 58.2 54.7 66.2 41.2 53.8 12 67.2 66.7 65.91 59.6 58.21 59.91 56.2 67.71 39.9 55.8 13 67.5 66.5 66.1 59.8 58.3 59.7 56.1 67.9 42.3 55.1 14 67.51 66.4 66.0 60.2 58.3 60.0 56.6 68.0 29.2 56.4 15 67.6 66.4 66.1 60.2 58.7 60.1 56.4 68.1 40.6 56.2 16 67.9 66.9 66.7 60.7 59.1 60.8 56.8 68.1 37.2 56.6 17 67.4 66.5 66.4 59.9 58.6 59.9 55.9 68.0 45.1 56.7 18 66.4 65.5 65.3 58.5 56.9 58.5 54.6 66.6 48.6 53.9 19 67.8 66.0 69.11 58.7 58.11 63.91 55.3 65.71 42.2 53.1 20 67.7 66.2 66.1 60.1 58.4 59.7 56.3 68.3 42.2 56.4 21 67.21 66.2 65.7 59.3 58.3 59.5 56.1 67.8 40.6 56.0 22 67.6 66.9 66.3 59.8 58.9 60.0 56.7 68.0 40.4 55.6 23 67.8 66.7 66.5 60.1 58.9 60.4 56.4 68.2 44.5 54.9 24 67.4 66.5 66.4 59.4 58.4 59.6 56.0 67.5 39.4 55.5 25 65.9 63.8 64.5 57.6 56.5 57.8 54.2 66.0 41.6 53.7 26 67.2 66.2 65.81 59.7 58.01 59.71 56.2 68.31 42.8 56.0 27 67.9 66.6 66.5 60.6 58.6 60.5 56.6 67.8 40.6 55.4 28 67.81 66.8 66.5 59.8 58.7 60.3 56.3 67.5 33.8 55.1 29 67.6 66.5 66.4 59.8 58.4 59.9 55.6 68.0 33.0 56.3 '067.6 66.6 66.2 60.0 58.5 60.2 56.2 68.4 41.7 55.6 31 67.6 66.3 66.3 59.6 58.1 59.9 55.8 68.4 35.6 56.3 Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 En. Avg 67.3 66.21 66.1 5 .61 58.21 59.91 55.91 67.6 41.8 55.6 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION August 2015 Date NMS Site IS I 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION 1 66.2 64.8 64.9 58.2 57.1 58.5 54.5 66.6 31.9 54.8 2 67.2 66.1 65.8 58.8 57.9 59.1 55.1 68.0 29.9 55.5 3 67.8 66.6 66.5 59.6 58.3 59.9 56.0 67.3 34.5 55.3 4 67.7 66.8 66.8 59.6 58.5 60.1 55.7 67.3 47.7 55.2 5 67.5 66.6 66.2 59.0 58.2 59.4 55.7 67.5 33.2 54.9 6 67.9 66.8 66.5 59.9 58.5 60.2 55.8 68.5 36.3 56.3 7 67.71 66.5 66.1 60.6 58.6 60.2 56.5 68.4 36.4 57.1 8 66.2 64.9 63.8 58.2 56.9 58.2 55.6 66.0 45.1 53.9 9 67.3 66.2 65.8 59.8 58.1 59.8 56.3 67.8 46.8 54.7 10 67.6 66.6 66.2 59.9 58.7 60.1 57.0 68.1 36.1 55.8 11 67.6 66.7 66.3 59.8 58.7 60.1 56.3 68.1 32.5 56.3 12 67.5 66.9 66.61 59.3 58.51 59.51 55.7 67.61 43.0 54.7 13 67.7 66.7 66.5 59.5 58.0 59.5 55.8 67.8 51.5 55.0 14 67.71 66.9 66.5 59.0 57.5 59.0 55.4 67.3 40.8 53.7 15 66.1 64.9 64.6 56.3 55.3 56.5 53.2 64.9 #N/A 51.4 16 67.2 66.1 66.1 58.4 56.8 58.1 54.3 67.8 40.8 53.1 17 67.7 66.4 66.1 60.4 58.1 60.0 56.0 68.3 46.7 56.2 18 67.4 66.1 65.9 60.1 58.1 59.7 56.1 68.3 42.3 55.6 19 67.4 66.4 66.11 59.7 58.51 59.81 56.0 68.3 #N/A 56.3 20 68.1 66.9 66.8 60.6 58.9 60.6 56.6 68.0 39.8 56.2 21 67.71 66.6 66.4 60.4 58.5 60.3 56.9 68.3 44.7 56.0 22 65.8 64.5 64.3 58.0 56.5 58.3 54.6 65.0 38.8 52.6 23 67.4 66.4 66.2 59.8 58.3 59.8 55.9 68.1 41.8 55.2 24 67.2 66.4 66.2 59.1 58.1 59.7 55.8 67.8 43.6 54.6 25 67.2 66.0 65.7 59.1 57.6 59.3 55.3 67.0 44.4 54.0 26 67.4 66.6 66.71 59.2 58.51 59.31 55.8 67.41 48.5 54.4 27 67.4 66.4 66.0 59.1 57.6 59.3 55.7 67.6 49.6 55.0 28 67.01 65.8 65.5 58.4 57.0 58.7 55.2 66.8 48.0 54.2 29 65.5 64.3 64.2 57.0 55.7 56.8 53.2 64.1 40.5 51.3 30 67.0 66.1 65.6 59.2 57.6 59.2 55.7 67.5 40.2 54.8 31 67.4 66.1 65.9 59.8 58.3 59.4 56.5 67.4 35.0 56.0 Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 En. Avg 67.3 66.21 66.01 59.31 57.91 59.41 55.71 67.51 44.3 55.0 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -8- TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION September 2015 Date NMS Site IS I 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION 1 66.7 65.5 65.2 59.5 57.7 59.2 55.9 67.5 41.9 55.4 2 67.2 66.2 65.8 59.6 58.1 59.8 56.4 67.6 4N/A 56.3 3 67.7 66.6 66.2 60.4 58.6 60.3 56.8 67.8 39.5 56.4 4 67.5 66.5 66.1 60.3 58.4 60.0 56.7 67.9 31.1 55.7 5 65.4 64.5 63.8 57.5 56.0 57.7 54.6 64.5 46.8 51.8 6 65.2 64.4 63.6 57.2 55.6 56.8 53.6 64.6 9N/A 51.7 7 67.41 66.0 66.2 58.8 57.5 59.1 55.5 66.7 #N/A 53.4 8 67.5 66.4 66.5 58.3 57.3 58.8 55.3 67.0 45.0 54.0 9 67.1 65.9 65.5 58.0 56.8 58.5 55.1 67.1 40.0 53.5 10 66.9 65.9 65.1 58.4 56.9 58.5 55.2 67.1 49.8 53.1 11 67.0 65.8 65.4 58.6 57.0 58.7 55.5 66.9 46.3 53.7 12 64.8 63.5 63.31 56.4 54.91 56.4 53.4 63.61 34.1 50.4 13 67.0 66.0 66.0 58.9 57.9 59.3 56.2 67.7 37.7 55.1 14 67.21 65.7 65.4 59.6 57.8 59.3 56.3 67.9 38.2 56.5 15 66.7 65.8 65.4 59.4 58.6 59.1 55.9 69.3 #N/A 57.7 16 67.8 66.6 66.5 60.1 59.0 60.3 57.0 68.0 41.3 56.0 17 68.3 67.1 66.8 59.8 59.3 60.3 57.2 69.2 32.6 58.5 18 67.6 66.5 66.7 59.1 58.5 60.1 56.3 68.1 42.9 55.6 19 65.2 64.2 64.01 57.0 55.71 57.1 53.2 63.81 32.0 51.7 20 67.1 66.2 66.1 57.0 57.2 58.4 55.3 66.8 47.8 53.6 21 67.41 65.6 65.6 59.9 57.3 59.3 55.9 67.3 41.6 55.3 22 66.5 65.6 65.3 58.9 57.7 59.2 55.9 67.1 38.7 54.6 23 67.2 66.2 66.1 58.8 58.2 59.4 55.8 66.7 41.1 54.0 24 67.7 66.7 66.4 59.2 58.0 59.6 55.9 67.1 #N/A 54.3 25 67.6 66.4 66.2 58.8 57.9 59.0 55.6 67.2 43.0 54.9 26 64.7 63.5 63.81 55.6 55.01 56.5 52.9 64.11 38.7 51.8 27 67.2 66.0 65.9 58.5 57.3 58.6 55.3 67.2 38.0 54.0 28 67.81 66.7 66.8 59.5 58.5 59.6 55.9 67.2 41.9 54.3 29 67.0 66.1 65.7 58.7 58.0 59.11 55.6 66.8 37.1 55.2 30 71.5 70.3 69.9 58.9 58.0 59.4 55.9 67.2 40.8 54.5 Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 30 En. Avg 67.3 66.1 65.9 58.8 57.6 59.0 55.7 67.1 42.7 54.8 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A July - Septempber 2015 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site IST2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION Alaska Air 8734 4 Average 97.1 94.7 96.8 91.8 87.6 912 85.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (0) (0) (0) 8737 178 Average 925 91.7 89.0 84.2 81.8 84.0 80.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (177) (176) (176) (177) (178) (174) (170) (0) (0) (0) 8738 785 Average 98.1 96.5 97.0 90.3 87.3 89.2 84.2 94.3 #N/A 80.3 Count (783) (776) (775) (779) (782) (772) (773) (1) (0) (1) American 8738 1184 Average 98.5 96.9 97.2 88.7 88.2 890 85.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1177) (1171) (1174) (1173) (1181) (1152) (1164) (0) (0) (0) Delta A319 439 Average 94.8 94.0 93.7 86.9 85.7 86 2 82.3 93.4 #N/A 81.0 Count (431) (426) (427) (430) (430) (428) (423) (6) (0) (1) A320 31 Average 94.8 93.8 93.1 86.7 84.5 859 82.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (31) (31) (31) (30) (31) (31) (30) (0) (0) (0) 8739 1 Average 92.7 92.3 90.5 85.6 83.6 86.0 83.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) 8752 277 Average 95.9 94.8 94.3 87.6 86.5 87.3 83.9 93.7 4N/A 77.9 Count (272) (269) (271) (268) (269) (265) (264) (4) (0) (1) FedEx A306 64 Average 96.7 96.1 94.2 88.6 87.5 89.1 85.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A ' Count (64) (64) (63) (64) (64) (63) (63) (0) (0) (0) Frontier Airlines A319 184 Average 93.7 93.0 92.1 86.0 85.1 85.7 82.3 #N/A #N/A 4N7Count (184) (183) (183) (182) (182) (181) (178) (0) (0) (0) Southwest 13737 2254 Average 92.5 91.7 90.4 85.0 84.3 85.5 82.7 91.1 77.3 79.3 Count (2240) (2222) (2222) (2235) (2240) (2222) (2192) (2) (1) (1) 6738 317 Average 92.9 922 89.7 84.6 83.2 84.9 82.3 94.7 79.0 #N/A Count (315) (311) (309) (314) (312) (309) (314) (1) (1) (0) United A320 697 Average 93.4 92.4 91.7 85.2 84.5 86.8 85.0 93.9 #N/A 80.9 Count (680) (670) (680) (675) (677) (673) (670) (14) (0) (3) B737 576 Average 95.8 94.4 95.7 88.9 88.8 90.0 85.4 93.5 #N/A 80.8 Count (573) (568) (569) (571) (570) (565) (565) (2) (0) (1) B738 162 Average 97.6 96.0 96.2 89.1 88.3 90.1 85.8 94.5 #N/A #N/A Count (159) (157) (158) (156) (159) (156) (158) (2) (0) (0) UPS B752 52 Average 96.0 95.7 93.4 86.4 85.7 86.6 82.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (52) (52) (52) (52) (52) (52) (52) (0) (0) (0) US Airways A320 298 Average 94.0 93.4 91.5 84.8 84.1 84.5 81.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (298) (296) (295) (295) (297) (295) (286) (0) (0) (0) A321 119 Average 98.4 97.5 95.9 87.5 86.4 86.8 83.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (118) (115) (115) (118) (117) (116) (118) (0) (0) (0) B752 15 Average 94.7 94.9 91.3 83.5 82.6 82.6 80.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (15) (15) (15) (15) (15) (15) (12) (0) (0) (0) wesdet B737 92 Average 94.9 93.5 94.3 89.5 86.1 88.4 82.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (92) (91) (92) (92) (92) (90) (88) (0) (0) (0) -10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E Jul%- Septempber 2015 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site IS I 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION Sky West Coral. CRJ9 220 Average Count 90.5 (218) 89.1 (218) 88.6 (219) 79.4 (1) A(2665)(I-661) 80.2 (178) 79.1 (143) #N/A (0) #N(/Al#N/A 0) (0) South«est B737 2678 Average Count 90.8 (2667) 90.4 (2656) 89.1 (2651) 78.4 (241) 81.3 (456) 84.6 (2634) 81.8 (2602) 91.0 (3) 78.6 (1) #N/A (0) TABLES MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter July - Septempber 2015 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S I 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N I ION Sky West C1,60 2 A erage Count 85.21 (2) 85.1 (2) 87.0 (2) 79.4 (1) #N/A (0) 80.0 (2) #N/A#N/A (0) (0) #N/A (0) #N(/OA ) CRJ7 465 Average Count 88.0 (461) 87.2 (455) 86.6 (461) 79.7 (375) 78.4 (241) 81.3 (456) 78.7 (333) 90.2 (1) #N/A (0) #N/A (0) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVI7LS General Aviation July - Septempber 2015 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site IS I 2S I 3S ZLZ 5S I 6S I 7S I SN I 9N I ION General Aviation Jet 3537 Average Count 87.8 (3334) 86.7 (3245) 88.8 (3259) 82.6 (1797) 82.3 (1219) 82.3 (2557) 81.7 (687) 86.1 (30) 78.4 (1) #N/A (0) -11- TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Cartier AC Tspe Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Air Canada AC A319 4 Alaska Air AS B734 110 84 73 89 58 B737 7,435 6.238 5,673 4,381 1,967 B738 761 942 1,162 2,486 3,345 American AA 8738 7,208 7,667 8,658 9,339 6,969 B752 1,519 911 4 4 MD82 4 Compass CP E170 1 1,352 Continental CO 8737 4,124 B738 1,163 Delta DL A319 5348 3,436 3,354 3,290 2,600 A320 36 31 21 142 68 B737 3.373 1,860 11 B738 87 55 14 4 B739 2 B752 45 1.073 2,214 2,196 1,600 FedEx FM A306 506 508 506 508 380 A310 2 2 2 2 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 88 369 17 A319 2,751 2,368 2.278 2,381 1,297 A320 6 2 Interjet 40 A320 346 1,490 428 Mesa Airlines YV CR19 720 626 418 SkvWest Coral. SC CR19 584 2,034 2,007 1,444 Southwest WN 8733 41 1 2 2 B737 31,187 33,490 35,234 33,490 27,029 B738 132 391 1,385 1,748 United UA A319 1,931 2,133 2,453 1,926 1,149 A320 4,419 4,554 4,229 2,774 2,273 B735 I B737 447 3,786 3,836 4,436 3,274 8738 77 1,407 1,305 1,748 1,488 8739 2 8752 9161 1,0391 1,557 237 44 UPS 5X B752 420 414 412 414 310 US Airways AW A319 1,152 2.442 1,997 808 230 A320 1,086 1,485 888 1,426 1,420 A321 586 247 860 934 658 R733 1,349 8752 32 8 22 46 94 Wesdet WS B736 4 B737 766 1,093 730 72'19.97546 'Total 79,658 80,691 81,841 77,615 5 TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 A306 506 508 506 508 380 A310 2 2 2 2 A318 88 369 17 A319 11.186 10.379 10.082 8.405 5.276 A320 5.547 6.418 6.628 4.770 3.761 A321 586 247 860 934 658 B733 L353 21 2 B734 1101 84 73 89 58 B735 I B736 4 B737 47332 46,467 45,484 43.035 32,816 8738 9,296 10,203 11.530 14,962 13,550 13739 2 2 B752 2,932 3,445 4,205 2,897 2,052 CRJ9 720 1,210 2,4521 2,007 1,444 E 170 1,352 MO82 4 Total 79,658 80,691 81,841 77,615 59,997 -13- TABLE I I AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE I IISI"ORY Carrier AC Type Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Air Canada AC A319 005 Alaska Air AS B734 .151 115 .101 121 079 B737 10 178 8 527 7 775 6 000 2.696 B738 1.049 1 284 1 586 3 408 4581 American AA B738 9.877 10.484 11.860 12 792 9.548 B752 2082 1 235 .005 .005 MD82 .005 Compass CP E170 1 1847 Continental CO 8737 5 649 B738 1.597 Delta DL A319 7 321 4 699 4.597 507 3 562 A320 055 041 .027 .195 .093 B737 4.627 2.538 .016 B738 .115 .079 .019 .005 B739 .003 B752 .063 1.462 3.033 3.008 2192 FedEx FM A306 .693 694 .693 .696 .521 A310 .003 .003 .003 003 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 .121 .503 .025 A319 3.770 3.235 3121 3.260 1778 A320 008 .003 Interjet 40 A320 A73 2.041 586 Mesa Airlines YV CR19 986 .855 573 SkvN'est Count SC CR.19 .801 17861 2.748 1978 Southwest \VN 8733 005 003 .003 B737 42.737 45.770 48 268 45 874 37 025 B738 180 537 1.901 2.392 United UA A319 2.627 2.910 3 364 2 636 1.575 A320 6 077 6.240 5 797 3.803 3 115 B735 B737 .608 5178 5.249 6077 4485 B738 .110 1 921 1 792 2.395 2036 B739 .003 8752 1.2521 1 4181 2132 ..326 060 UPS 5X B752 .575 .566 564 .567 .425 US Airways AW A319 1 575 3 331 2.732 1 107 .315 A320 1.488 2025 1.219 1.953 1945 A321 .805 .344 1.181 1279 .901 B733 1.849 B752 .044 .011 0301 .129 Wesdet WS IB B736 .005 737 1.049 1.492 1.000 .997 .748 "Total 1 109.153 1 110.270 1 112 126 1 106.321 1 82.186 14- QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING Date: September 9, 2015 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building ITEMS DISCUSSED: Newport Beach resident, Jim Mosher, attended the quarterly meeting. Mr. Mosher expressed concern over the Airport's reporting of noise values at monitoring stations. He requested the Airport provide a software program available to the public which would allow SENEL values to be viewed live and in playback mode. Mr. Mosher was wanting to conduct his own analysis of noise values for J WA Carriers based off of a public software program. Eric Freed explained to Mr. Mosher that it would have limited benefit since it does not represent how commercial carriers are regulated. Mr. Mosher also requested that our office provide one year of quarterly reports on website, e.g., April 2014 -June 2015. Eric informed Mr. Mosher we would provide that information on the website. Mr. Mosher also requested a CNEL table dating further back than 1994. Mr. Mosher also inquired about the side-by-side noise report conducted during the Airport's transition to its new noise monitoring system. He believed the raised limits are problematic and provide aircraft operators with more noise flexibility. He noticed noise readings at NMS 8N are sometimes higher than departure monitors. Eric informed Mr. Mosher that this monitor is close to the runway and aircraft are in a "dirty' configuration on final. Mr. Mosher did state he understands he is the minority. 15- QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING ROSTER NAME Jim Mosher Eric Freed Bonnie Frisch Nikolas Gaskins Anthony Cangey Louie Ilustrisimo September 9, 2015 16- ORGANIZATION Resident, Newport Beach John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport SNA/John Wayne Airport SUMMARY OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION FOR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I. Size of Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21, chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6): 6.74 acres (or 0.010 square miles) 2. Estimated Number of dwelling units included in the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards: 75 dwelling units 3. Estimated number of people residing within the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards: 188 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling) 4. Identification of aircraft of type having highest takeoff noise level operating at this airport together with estimated number of operations by this aircraft type during the calendar quarter reporting period: B737-800, 4,860 (arrivals & departures) 5. Total number of aircraft operations during the calendar quarter: 6. Number of Air Carrier operations during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 67,672 22,197 7. Percentage of Air Carrier operations by aircraft certified under Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36, Stage III: (Not mandatory) 100% 8. Estimated number of operations by General Aviation aircraft during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 45,296 9. Estimated number of operations by Military aircraft during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 179