HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 14 MEASURE 'M' 06-03-91A r_ 1: Ki n&
CONSENT CALENDAR NO. 14
6-3-91
Inter -Com
DATE: MAY 29, 1991
TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
SUBJECT: MEASURE %M' MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS CONSISTENCY
REQUIREMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Tustin City Council pass and adopt the attached Resolution
approving the definition of, and process for, determining the
consistency of a local jurisdiction's circulation plan with the
County Master Plan of Arterial Highway for Measure M purposes.
BACKGROUND:
Measure `M' ordinance No. 2 requires that the definition of,`and
process for, determining the consistency of a local jurisdictions
circulation plan with the County Masterplan of Arterial Highways
(MPAH) be approved by two-thirds of the cities which also include
two-thirds of the incorporated residents of Orange County. The
League of California Cities has adopted a definition and process
for determining this consistency on April 11, 1991 which meets the
six month deadline as outlined in the ordinance. In addition to
their adoption of the definition and process, the League is
requesting each of the cities to adopt a Resolution which will
clearly demonstrate by acceptance by at least two-thirds of the
cities.
The definition and process were developed by a committee of City
Managers and City Engineers, and is outlined on Attachment "A" of
the Resolution which is being presented -for adoption by the City
Council.
DISCUSSION:
The definition indicates that a city circulation element must have
an equivalent planned traffic -carrying capacity for all MPAH links
within the City's jurisdiction as is shown on the County MPAH in
order to be eligible for regional funding. "Planned Capacity" is
measured by the number of through lanes on each arterial highway as
shown on the local circulation element.
In the event the City unilaterally reduces the number of through
lanes on an MPAH arterial highway on it's circulation element to
less than shown on the MPAH without County approval, it shall be
inconsistent with the M.P.A.H. as of the date the City Council
action is taken and .is ineligible for regional funding until
consistency is re-established.
Page 2
The process provides for the following:
1. Annual verification of program eligibility by the City's
adoption of a General*Plan Circulation Element consistent
with the MPAH and a City Council Resolution attesting
that no unilateral reduction of lanes has been made on
any MPAH arterial roadways.
2. County will provide an annual review to determine if the
City elements provide equal numbers of through lanes for
each highway shown on the M.P.A.H.
3. A joint committee of City and County representatives will
make recommendations for eligibility to the Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA) for Measure M, Combined
Road Program (CRP) and Orange County Unified
Transportation Trust Fund (OCUTT) programs.
In the event a city has been determined ineligible for regional
funds, it may seek to re-establish eligibility by requesting a
cooperative study be undertaken with the county. Provisions are
also existent to allow mutual changes to the local circulation
element and county M.P.A.H.
Staff requests the Tustin City Council pass and adopt the attached
Resolution at their meeting of June 3, 1991.
Robert S. Ledendecker
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
RSL:klb:MEAM
ATTACHMENT A
REGIONAL FUNDING PROGRAM CONSISTENCY AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
CONSISTENCY DEFINITION
Consistency with the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH)
is the primary criterion for determining city and county
commitment to maintaining the integrity of the regional
transportation system. *For a city circulation element to be
consistent with the MPAH, for purposes of regional funding
program eligibility, it shall have an equivalent planned
traffic -carrying capacity for all MPAH links within the city's
jurisdiction.
"Planned capacity" shall be measured by the number of through
lanes on each arterial highway as shown on the local
circulation element. Cities shall not be inconsistent as a
result of existing capacity limitations on arterials which are
not yet constructed to the circulation element designation.
However, any city which unilaterally reduces the number of
through lanes of an MPAH arterial highway on its circulation
element to less than shown on the MPAH without County approval
shall be inconsistent with the MPAH on the date city council
action is taken and is ineligible for regional funding until
consistency is re-established.
PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY
Local Agency Responsibility
Eligibility requirements shall be verified annually as
follows:
1. For Measure M "Streets and Road Maintenance and Road
Improvements" ($450 million "turnback") funds, cities
shall adopt a General Plan Circulation Element which does
not preclude implementation of the MPAH and shall take no
action to preclude implementation of the MPAH.
2. For all competitive regional funding programs such as the
Arterial Highway Financing Program (AHFP), Orange County
Unified Transportation Trust Fund (OCUTT), Combined Road
Fund (CRP), and Measure M "Regional Street and Road
Projects", "MPAH Improvements" and "Growth Management
Area Improvements", cities shall adopt:
a. A General Plan Circulation Element which is
consistent with the MPAH, and
b. a City Council resolution attesting that no
- unilateral reduction in lanes has been made on any
MPAH arterials.
Annual Review Process
Each year, County shall determine if city circulation elements
provide equal numbers of through lanes for each highway shown
on the MPAH. County shall also ensure that local agencies
have not unilaterally reduced the number of lanes on any
existing arterial highway (effective April 1, 1991).
Approval Process
Upon completion of the review, a joint committee of city and
county representatives will make recommendations for
eligibility to the Orange County Transportation Authority for
Measure M, CRP, and OCUTT programs and to the County Board of
Supervisors for Arterial Highway Financing Program. These
recommendations shall be reviewed and formally approved by
OCTA and the Board.
RE-ESTABLISHING PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY
Once a city has been determined to be ineligible for regional
funds, it may seek to re-establish eligibility by requesting a
cooperative study be undertaken with County. The study will
be designed to 1) ascertain the regional transportation system
need, 2) make provisions to meet those needs in the city
General Plan and 3) re-establish consistency with the MPAH.
Any changes to the city General Plan or the MPAH shall be
mutually acceptable to the city and the county. Until such a
study has been completed, the City shall be ineligible to
receive applicable funds.
MUTUAL CHANGES TO CIRCULATION ELEMENT AND MPAH
A city and the County may mutually revise their respective
circulation elements through the cooperative process outlined
above. Cities shall continue to be eligible to receive funds
while the cooperative study process is underway.
klb:attacha
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 91-82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DEFINITION OF, AND PROCESS FOR,
DETERMINING THE CONSISTENCY OF A LOCAL JURISDICTION'S
CIRCULATION PLAN WITH THE COUNTY MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL
HIGHWAYS FOR MEASURE M PURPOSES.
The City Council of the City of Tustin hereby resolves,
determines, and orders as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Tustin desires to maintain and improve
the street and roads within its jurisdiction;
WHEREAS, the City supports regional coordination of
transportation improvements;
WHEREAS, the City desires to use funds collected from the
Revised Orange County Traffic Improvement and Growth Management
Ordinance for transportation maintenance and improvement projects.
WHEREAS, the Revised Orange County Traffic Improvement and
Growth Management Ordinance states that within six months after
approval of the Retail Tax by the electors, the Orange County Local
Transportation Authority (OCLTA), through a cooperative process
involving the County and all of the cities within the County, shall
adopt a definition of, and a process for, determining consistency
of each jurisdiction's Traffic Circulation Plan with the Master
Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH).
WHEREAS, representatives from OCLTA, City Engineers
Association, City Managers Association and the County of Orange
have developed a definition of, and process for, determining
consistency of each jurisdiction's Traffic Circulation Element with
the MPAH (Attachment A) which was endorsed by a unanimous vote of
the Orange County Division of the League of California Cities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the City Council of the
City of Tustin hereby endorses the Regional Funding Program
Consistency and Eligibility Criteria as included in Attachment A as
the defintion of, and process for, determining consistency of the
City of Tustin's Traffic Circulation Plan with the MPAH.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Tustin, held on the 3rd day of June 1991.
ATTEST:
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Charles Puckett, Mayor