Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1994 06 20MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JUNE 20, 1994 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 7:10 p.m. at the Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Doyle. The Invocation was given by Councilmember Thomas. PUBLIC HEARING (ITEM 1) 1. LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 1994-95 FISCAL YEAR FOR THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT Katie Pitcher, Administrative Assistant, reported that staff had received a written protest from a property owner regarding annexation of his property into the Landscape and Lighting District. Council/staff discussion followed regarding protest procedures; and the number of parcels annexed into the Landscape and Lighting District. Mayor Saltarelli opened the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m. There were no speakers on the subject and the Public Hearing was closed. It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Doyle, to adopt the following Resolution No. 94-71: RESOLUTION NO. 94-71 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF ADDITIONAL TERRITORY TO AN EXISTING DISTRICT CONFIRMING THE ANNUAL 1994-95 FISCAL YEAR LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC LANDSCAPING LIGHTING FACILITIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY INCLUDED IN THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEMS 2 THROUGH 14) 340-60 Item No. 4 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilmember Thomas. It was moved by Potts, seconded by Doyle, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar as recommended by staff. Motion carried 4-01 Worley absent. k ROLL CALL Council Present: Thomas R. Saltarelli, Mayor Jim Potts, Mayor Pro Tem Mike Doyle Jeffery M. Thomas Council Absent: Tracy A. Worley City Clerk: Mary E. Wynn Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager Lois Jeffrey, City Attorney Christine Shingleton, Assistant City Manager W. Douglas Franks, Chief of Police Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Robert Ruhl, Field Services Manager Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Valerie Whiteman, Chief Deputy City Clerk Dana Kasdan, Engineering Services Manager Bettie Correa, Senior Personnel Analyst Randy Westrick, Recreation Supervisor Doug Anderson, Transportation Engineer Irma Hernandez, Administrative Assistant Katie Pitcher, Administrative Assistant Approximately 20 in the audience PUBLIC INPUT - None PUBLIC HEARING (ITEM 1) 1. LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 1994-95 FISCAL YEAR FOR THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT Katie Pitcher, Administrative Assistant, reported that staff had received a written protest from a property owner regarding annexation of his property into the Landscape and Lighting District. Council/staff discussion followed regarding protest procedures; and the number of parcels annexed into the Landscape and Lighting District. Mayor Saltarelli opened the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m. There were no speakers on the subject and the Public Hearing was closed. It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Doyle, to adopt the following Resolution No. 94-71: RESOLUTION NO. 94-71 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF ADDITIONAL TERRITORY TO AN EXISTING DISTRICT CONFIRMING THE ANNUAL 1994-95 FISCAL YEAR LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC LANDSCAPING LIGHTING FACILITIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY INCLUDED IN THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEMS 2 THROUGH 14) 340-60 Item No. 4 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilmember Thomas. It was moved by Potts, seconded by Doyle, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar as recommended by staff. Motion carried 4-01 Worley absent. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 6-20-94 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 6, 1994 REGULAR MEETING Recommendation: Approve the City Council Minutes of June 6, 1994. 3. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS AND RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL Recommendation: Approve Demands in the amount of $1,766,656.07 and ratify Payroll in the amount of $312,152.04. 380-10 360-82 5. SALE OF SURPLUS FURNITURE Recommendation: Receive and file notice of sale of surplus furniture as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 380-60 6. FIRE SERVICES CONTRACT Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement with the County of Orange which extends the City's agreement for fire suppression, prevention, inspection and paramedic services through June 30, 1995 as recommended by the City Manager. 400-70 7. PROPERTY ACQUISITION - EL CAMINO REAL Recommendation: Approve the following three actions: (1) Confirm the acquisition of the property at 1921-1951 El Camino Real, (2) Authorize a supplemental budget appropriation to the 1993-94 Capital Improvement Program Budget (Project 700116) in the amount of $295,000.00 from the unappropriated reserve of the Measure "M" Turnback funds, and (3) Authorize staff to execute an agreement with Hinkson Property Management Services at the monthly rate of $200.00 as recommended by the Public Works Department/ Engineering Division. gX..lb 1 490-10 8. AUTHORIZATION TO CONTINUE OPERATION FOR FISCAL 1994-95 Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to continue fiscal operations for 1994-95 at an appropriation level not to exceed that of 1993-94, until such time as the budget process can be completed as recommended by the Finance Department. 330-50 9. REQUEST FOR PERMIT PARKING ON ROSALIE PLACE AND QUENT DRIVE Recommendation: Approve the request for permit parking on Rosalie Place and Quent Drive, and direct staff to prepare the necessary documentation to amend City Code Section 5331 to designate these streets with on -street parking by permit only as recommended byy the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 770-I5 10. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - JUNE 13, 1994 All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed by the City Council or member of the public. Recommendation: Ratify the Planning Commission Action Agenda of June 13, 1994. 120-50 11. ORANGE COUNTY LIBRARY TASK FORCE STATUS REPORT Recommendation: Receive and file subject report as recommended by the City Manager. 910-30 12. AIRPORT STATUS REPORT Recommendation: Receive and file subject report as recommended by the Community Development Department. 690-10 13. RESOLUTION NO. 94-74 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CITY RECORDS, DOCUMENTS, AND PAPERS IN THE POSSESSION OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR THE CONDUCT OF CITY BUSINESS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY GRANTED BY SECTIONS 34090, 34090.5 AND 34090.7 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 94-74 that authorizes the destruction of police records as permitted by law as recommended by the Police Department. 170-40 14. (Item No. 14 was removed from the Agenda). CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 4 TUSTIN AREA SENIOR CENTER FUND, INC. DONATION Councilmember Thomas commended staff for utilizing senior volunteers to assist in mailing water bills, encouraged staff to use them in other CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 6-20-94 capacities, and thanked the seniors for their assistance. It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Doyle, to authorize staff to issue a check to the Tustin Area Senior Center Fund, Inc. in the amount of $3,800.00 from the Water Enterprise Fund to acknowledge the senior volunteers who have helped the City over the past nine months and authorize the continuance of the current arrangement as long as it continues to be of mutual benefit to both parties. Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. 125-80 REGULAR BUSINESS (ITEMS 15 THROUGH 24) 15. ORDINANCE NO. 1127, ZONE CHANGE 93-5 (LAING HOMES) It was moved by Potts, seconded by Thomas, that Ordinance No. 1127 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1127 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Potts seconded by Thomas, to adopt the following Ordinance No. 1127: ORDINANCE NO. 1127 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 93-005 TO AMEND SECTION 3.6.3.A2.4 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MODIFY THE BUILDING SETBACKS FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY AND CONDOMINIUM DWELLINGS IN THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent (roll call vote). 610-60 16. ORDINANCE NO. 1126, TERM LIMITS It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Potts, that Ordinance No. 1126 have second reading by title only. Councilmember Thomas stated that he was not opposed to term limits; however, he suggested limiting terms to three consecutive terms. He said that the language in the proposed ordinance was vague in defining "full term" and stated three consecutive terms would allow Councilmembers who had been appointed to fill partial term vacancies, to be eligible to run for office for two additional terms. Council discussion followed regarding clarification of the definition of "full term"; and submitting two alternatives to the voters, three consecutive terms or two consecutive terms. Lois Jeffrey, City Attorney, stated that the proposed ordinance could be amended to clarify "two full consecutive terms" to "two 4 -year consecutive terms." Mayor Saltarelli stated he had received thirteen phone calls from residents in the past two weeks regarding this issue. The callers indicated that the voters, not Council, should decide the number of terms for an elected official; and they preferred three consecutive terms rather than two consecutive terms. He stated he supported term limits; however, he believed that the City should not be the leader in reducing term limits to two terms because it would hinder the City's strength on County commissions/committees and in achieving future goals. He favored limiting terms to three consecutive terms and including both choices of two consecutive terms and three consecutive terms on the November ballot. Mayor Pro Tem Potts clarified that since the proposed ordinance had been introduced at the June 6, 1994 Council meeting, the only Council action required was to vote for or against second reading of this ordinance. He stated that studies indicated a majority of California cities had already implemented term limits. Council/staff discussion followed regarding agendizing an ordinance addressing three consecutive term limits for the November ballot. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 6-20-94 Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1126 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Doyle, seconded by Potts, to adopt the following Ordinance No. 1126: ORDINANCE NO. 1126 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, LIMITING CONSECUTIVE TERMS OF MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent (roll call vote). 420-05 17. APPROVAL OF REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS FOR ADVERTISING BUS SHELTERS AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Katie Pitcher, Administrative Assistant, reported that the staff report addressed concerns raised by a prospective proposer and several vendors. She summarized the guaranteed franchise fee of $150.00 per bus shelter; advertising revenue per bus shelter panel; Orange County cities' Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements; and start-up costs. Council/staff discussion followed regarding start-up costs. Councilmember Thomas voiced concern regarding the length of time it was taking to proceed with this project and that the RFP was not business friendly. He noted that the $150.00 franchise fee was the second highest in Orange County and suggested the fee be modified. He stressed the importance of attracting businesses to the City and expressed concern with requiring a $5,000.00 advance from a proposer to enter into franchise negotiations without exclusivity. He encouraged expediting this project to provide bus passengers with shelter from weather conditions. William Huston, City Manager, stated that from the City's standpoint, the RFP was reasonable and reflected the current market. He noted that market response to the RFP would determine whether it was too stringent. He said that staff recommended approval of the proposed RFP. Christine Shingleton, Assistant City Manager, stated it was unorthodox for vendors to request modification of an RFP to benefit their company. She strongly recommended proceeding with the proposed RFP, and noted that the document was compiled from surveys of other Orange County cities to attract the best vendor responses. Councilmember Thomas said he wanted a fair process so vendors were not exposed to undue financial burdens. Council/staff discussion followed regarding vendor responses; rewriting the RFP if proposals received by the City were unacceptable; and the estimated annual maintenance costs of bus shelters. The following members of the audience spoke in opposition to the proposed RFP: Richard Wannenmacher, Gannett Transit representative (submitted a letter) Bruce Seidel, Patrick Target Media Council/speakers discussion followed regarding the guaranteed franchise fee; Gannett Transit's estimated start-up costs, performance bond costs, and City exclusion zones; term of franchise agreement; and the City's lack of acceptance of non- conforming bids. Mayor Pro Tem Potts stated he understood the City's position of requesting a $5,000.00 advance from the selected proposer as well as the vendors' opposition to the structured RFP. He voiced his concern with delaying this issue but believed a compromise could be reached between the City and prospective vendors, and suggested continuing the item to the July 5, 1994 Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 6-20-94 Mayor Saltarelli stated he supported continuing the item to allow staff time to confer with concerned vendors and refine the RFP. He stated his concern that the five-year term of the vendor's franchise agreement may not be sufficient time to allow amortization of the investment costs. William Huston, City Manager, stated staff would submit a report at the July 5, 1994 Council meeting addressing all areas of concern. 690-35 18. REVISION OF PARK CLOSING HOURS - FRONTIER PARR Randy Westrick, Recreation Supervisor, reported that in May 1994, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended Frontier Park close from sunset to 6:00 a.m. due to security and vandalism problems. He said the Police Department had tried various options to mitigate transients from utilizing the park at night with sporadic success. He stated the Parks and Recreation Commission suggested using the term "sunset" to create consistency with the City's other park hours necessitating changing the Tustin Centennial Park sign to read "sunset" instead of "dusk." Mayor Pro Tem Potts supported closing Frontier Park from sunset to 6:00 a.m. allowing Police Department enforcement discretion. He said the new park hours would help alleviate the problems experienced by other cities when groups of people monopolize parks preventing residents from utilizing the facilities. Mayor Saltarelli stated he preferred other remedies to solve .problems in the park rather than reducing hours, but, if the hours were changed, that it not be permanent. He favored setting a specific time rather than use the terms "dusk" or "sunset." .-• Council/staff discussion followed regarding children using the .park after dusk; neighborhood support of modifying the park hours; and positive measures taken to improve the conditions of Frontier .Park. Councilmember Thomas stated he supported setting specific park closure hours because it would aid the Police Department in enforcing park closure. Council/staff discussion followed regarding possible confusion to the public of the definition of "sunset;" and setting a specific closure time. Councilmember Thomas suggested approving staff's recommendation, and staff review the modified park hours in six months. It was moved by Thomas seconded by Doyle, to adopt the following Resolution No. 94-62 which closes Frontier Park from sunset to 6:00 a.m.; and staff to review closure hours in six months: RESOLUTION NO. 94-62 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING HOURS AT FRONTIER PARK Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. It was moved by Thomas seconded by Potts, to change wording of signs at Tustin Centennial Park to read "sunset" instead of "dusk." Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. 920-30 19. CITY TREASURER 920-15 Mayor Pro Tem Potts stated that the City of Orange had conducted research regarding elected treasurer versus appointed treasurer which revealed several reasons why an elected treasurer might create problems for a city. He said Tustin needed an additional check and balance system and improved communication with the Council regarding some financial matters. He stated that more information was needed to determine the feasibility of an elected treasurer and requested staff conduct a study of Orange County CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 6-20-94 cities and submit a report at a future Council meeting. The following member of the audience requested that the Audit Committee conduct a study and present the findings at a future Council meeting: Al Shifberg-Mencher, Tustin Audit Committee It was moved by Potts seconded by Thomas, to refer this item to the Audit Committee for study. Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. 315-05 20. DRAFT ORDINANCE - BIDDING OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION CONTRACT Mayor Pro Tem Potts stated that this ordinance should be placed on the ballot to allow residents the option of whether they wanted solid waste collection contracts to go out to open bidding every five years. He explained that a five-year contract would allow the contractor to recoup their expenses; prevent trash contractors from making influential donations to future Councilmembers; and would restrict future Councils' direct involvement in selecting what company would be awarded the contract. Councilmember Thomas questioned the reason the ordinance had to be placed on the ballot; noted that donations from trash companies could be given to Councilmembers at any time; was concerned that a five-year contract term would not give the contractors sufficient time to recoup their expenses; and requested information from other cities that had placed trash contract initiatives on the ballot. Mayor Saltarelli stated he was not opposed to accepting the lowest bid, but since trash collection was a health and safety issue, it was necessary to get a reputable company to provide service for the City. He said that residents relied on the Council's judgement regarding major health and safety issues, he believed Council should decide on solid waste collection, and therefore he was opposed to placement on the ballot of the draft ordinance requiring competitive bids for solid waste/recycling. Mayor Pro Tem Potts said that further study was needed on this item; requested information regarding separating residential contracts from commercial contracts; noted San Diego District Attorney's involvement in trash collection in that county; stated open bidding every five years for large City contracts was healthy; and reiterated his support for placement of this ordinance on the ballot. Councilmember Thomas recommended continuing this item to allow staff time to acquire additional information and Council the opportunity to study this issue in depth. Mayor Pro Tem Potts voiced concern that delaying action on the proposed ordinance would prevent the issue from being placed on the November ballot; and that he believed large City contracts should be voted on by the people, not decided by Council. Mayor Saltarelli suggested delaying discussion of this issue at this time because the current trash contract would not expire for several years and the expected time involved in meeting with contractors and reviewing information. He reiterated his opposition to the proposed ordinance. Councilmember Doyle stated that he believed the issue should go to the voters to decide whether they wanted the City's trash contract to be open for competitive bids. Council discussion followed regarding the many facets to be investigated regarding this issue; the ordinance was premature; the majority of residents were satisfied with the trash service; the current trash contract was in effect for another six years; and whether staff had sufficient time to conduct research for the July 5, 1994 Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 6-20-94 William Huston, City Manager, stated that staff could present a cursory report for the next Council meeting; and noted other agencies utilized exclusive franchise agreements and consolidated commercial/residential trash collection contracts because of State law recycling requirements. The following member of the audience spoke in opposition to placing a solid waste collection ordinance on the ballot: Jerry Weil, 1702 Summerville Avenue, Tustin The following member of the audience spoke in favor of open bidding on the solid waste collection contract: Madeline Arakalian, South Coast Refuse and Integrative Recycling Systems The following members of the audience spoke in favor of placing a solid waste collection ordinance on the ballot: Berklee Maughan, Tustin Dolores Otting, 5 Star Rubbish Nancy Arakalian, South Coast Refuse and Integrative Recycling Systems Council/speaker (Maughan) discussion followed regarding utilizing an open bid process versus a Request for Proposal; and extending the contract term to seven years. It was moved by Potts seconded by Doyle, to approve the following Ordinance No. 1130: ORDINANCE NO. 1130 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING THAT CITY CONTACTS FOR THE COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE MATERIAL BE SUBJECT TO COMPETITIVE BID Council discussion followed regarding clarification of the motion. Mayor Pro Tem Potts withdrew his motion. It was moved by Potts, seconded by Thomas, to continue this item to the July 5, 1994 Council meeting. Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. 400-10 21. SANTA ANA-TUSTIN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY FEES It was moved by Potts seconded by Thomas, to adopt the following Resolution No. 94-72 eliminating the second year graduated Transportation System Improvement Authority fee increase: RESOLUTION NO. 94-72 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT FEES Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. 400-10 22. REQUEST BY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE Councilmember Thomas stated that one of the goals of the Economic Development Council was to market Old Town's unique character and historical significance. He said it was important for the City to support organizations that ultimately benefited the City and he supported rent financial assistance of $5,700.00 this year only. He encouraged the Historical Society to be diligent in their fund raising efforts in order to offset the organization's expenses. He stated that future financial requests by the Historical Society should be reviewed by the City annually. He suggested that when the Tustin library was refurbished in the future, the Historical Society should negotiate occupying space in the building rent- free. Mayor Pro Tem Potts said the City should be responsible for assisting this type of organization and supported the request of CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 6-20-94 23. 24. $5,700.00 this year; and noted that perhaps the Tustin Community Foundation could assist the Historical Society in the future. It was moved by Thomas seconded by Potts, to provide payment of $5,700.00 for the Historical Society's annual rent; and review annually. Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. BUDGET WORKSHOP DATES 330-20 William Huston, City Manager, stated that the 1994-95 draft budget was available and recommended scheduling a budget workshop. Council concurred to schedule a budget workshop on July 5, 1994, at 5:00 p.m. 330-50 MICRO CENTER DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Christine Shingleton, Assistant City Manager, reported that Micro Center requested this item be continued to the July 5, 1994 Council meeting. It was moved by Doyle seconded by Potts, to continue this item to the July 5, 1994 Council meeting. 400-10 Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. PUBLIC INPUT ROLLER HOCKEY Alex Reddin, In -Line Skate and Hockey Inc., requested Council consider utilizing the Tustin Sports Park as a roller hockey site. Mayor Pro Tem Potts stated this was an opportune time to consider using the Sports Park as a roller hockey rink because the site was under construction, and requested agendizing discussion of this item at the July 5, 1994 Council meeting. Council/speaker discussion followed regarding other locations for a hockey rink that had been investigated without success. It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Doyle, to agendize considering the use of the Sports Park as a roller hockey site. Motion carried 4-0, Worley absent. William Huston, City Manager, stated that staff would submit a report addressing cost of using the Sports Park and proposals from vendors would not be accepted at this time. Council/staff discussion followed regarding the staff report containing cost recovery options; and In -Line Skate should continue to investigate other feasible roller hockey locations. PARR SITE PARKING Cheryl Bell, 10535 Bruno Drive, Tustin, requested Council review the East Tustin Specific Plan and the need to resolve parking issues at park sites prior to construction. OTHER BUSINESS EL TORO AIRPORT INITIATIVE Councilmember Thomas requested agendizing at the July 5, 1994 Council meeting, the City's position on the El Toro airport initiative. CITY BUDGET Councilmember Thomas expressed the need to expedite completion of the budget process. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9, 6-20-94 MAYOR/MAYOR PRO TEM FRIENDSHIP Mayor Saltarelli noted that he and Mayor Pro Tem Potts were good friends who differed on certain issues. CLOSED SESSION - None ADJOURNMENT r-* Mayor Saltarelli adjourned the meeting at 9:30 p.m. The City Council had scheduled a Budget Workshop on July 5, 1994, 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers; and the next regular meeting of the City Council was scheduled for Tuesday, July 5, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 300 Centennial Way. I[ - FF"n" MARY E. WYNN, CITY CLERK