The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPH 2 WASTE ASSESS RPT 07-15-91PUBLIC .HEARING N0. 2 `7-15-91 AL1ENuA,2-1s--<1e1 Inter -Com ATE: JULY 11, 1991 TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: RONALD A. NAULT, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE SUBJECT: PROPOSED 1991-92 WASTE COLLECTION, ASSESSMENT REPORT AND RESOLUTION 91-99 ADOPTING THE REPORT RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 91-99 approving the report relative to parcels receiving solid waste collection services. DISCUSSION: Attached for your review are the supporting documents submitted by Great Western Reclamation as justification for their proposed fees for 1991-92. While the components that are used to calculate the increase in the collection fees grew only by 3.56 percent for the past year, (less than the general CPI of 4.8 percent), the County once again has increased the landfill fees $5 a ton, 28 percent, effective July 1, 1991. We have also initiated a Citywide Recycling Program that was discussed at the Council meeting of June 17, 1991. This has added an additional monthly cost of $1.97 per month. The combination of the three elements of our costs payable to Great Western will increase $2.64 per month for residential units and, $2.64 per month for commercial can units. This equates to an increase of 29.37 percent. Based on these increases the 1991-92 proposed rate for single family residential units is $11.63 per month; $139.56 per year per unit and, commercial can units will be $12.05 per month; $144.60 per year per unit. The 1990-91 rates for single family residential were $107.88 per year per unit and, commercial can rates were $112.80 per year per unit. The billable rates for the various commercial bin schedules will be allowed to increase by the same adjustment factors which will include a full Recycling Program for all Commercial/Industrial accounts where applicable. These rates are billed directly by the contractor so the detail is not included as part of the full assessment report. Items of concern that have been accumulating over the years are delinquencies, corrections, refunds, and impounds. According to the County Auditor -Controllers office, the countywide delinquency Page 3 Solid Waste Report July 11, 1991 To summarize the report, a 322 page computer printout, (single page sample attached), reflects a proposed single family residential solid waste collection rate of $11.73 er month, $140.76 per year. The proposed rate for commercial can service is $12.15 per month, $145.80 per year. (4 "1 A 0 Ron d A. Na . Director of Finance RAN: 1s Attachments a:sldwaste.wah 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11'. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 91-99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5473 ET SEQ. OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINALLY APPROVING AND ADOPTING A REPORT RELATIVE TO PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY RECEIVING SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES, DETERMINING THE CHARGES FOR SOLID WASTE COLLECTION TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE LOTS OR PARCELS OF LAND AS THEY APPEAR ON THE CURRENT ASSESSMENT ROLL. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: 1. That proceedings were duly instituted, conducted and completed pursuant to provisions of Section 5473 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. A. A written report dated July, 1991 containing a description of each parcel of real property receiving solid waste collection services and facilities and the amount of the charge proposed to be levied upon each parcel for the collection of solid waste for the fiscal year 1991-92 was prepared and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Tustin on July, 1991. B. That a public hearing to hear and consider all objections or protests, if any, to the aforesaid report and proposed charges was duly set for July 15, 1990 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City of Tustin at 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. C. Said hearing was duly noticed as required by law, by publication once each week for two successive weeks on July 5, and July 11, 1991 in the Tustin News, a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Tustin. D. At the aforesaid time and place the duly noticed hearing was held and all persons who were present were heard and all comments, objections and protests to the aforesaid report and proposed charges were duly heard and considered by the City Council. E. The charges proposed in the aforesaid report are fair and reasonable, are commensurate with the services provided, and the charge therefore should properly be collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, general taxes. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16I 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 Solid Waste Resolution 2. The City Council hereby elects to have the charges set forth in the aforesaid report collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, at the same time as, and together with and not separately from its general taxes and hereby authorizes that such charges be collected on the tax roll as all prescribed to the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 5473 et seq. 3. The resolution shall be effective following its adoption by a two-thirds vote of the members of the City Council and shall remain in force and effect and said charges shall be collected in the manner as aforesaid for the year 1991-92 and for each subsequent year as authorized by the hereinabove referenced sections of the Health and Safety Code. 4. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to forthwith file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Auditor of the County of Orange, together with a copy of the hereinabove - described report, and a statement endorsed thereon over her signature that the said report has been finally adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, held on the day of , 1991. ATTEST: Mary Wynn City Clerk City of Tustin a:solidast.fee Charles E. Puckett Mayor I Great Western Reclamation, Inc. P.O. Box 2337 �- 1800 S. Grand Avenue Santa Ana, California 92705 714/558-7761 ,✓�' June 18, 1991 Mr. William Huston City Manager City of Tustin 15222 Del Amo Tustin, CA 92680 Dear Bill: A Waste Management Company OPM N - MR �AT I A Enclosed you will find the proposed trash removal rates for the City of Tustin to be effective July 1, 1991. You will notice the residential rate shown taking effect July 1, 1991 is the rate previously agreed upon by the City of Tustin and Great Western Reclamation. The breakout of collection and disposal are also shown at the agreed upon amounts. The rate for commercial can service was increased and adjusted in accordance with the adjustment to residential service. As in the past the disposal portion of the commercial can rate is equal to the residential rate. The collection rate for commercial can was $.42 per month higher than residential during the period July 1990 to June 1991. This same $.42 differential has been carried forward to the July 1, 1991 pricing. The end result is that both residential and commercial can rates will increase by $2.64. Commercial can customers are serviced by residential route trucks, therefore their refuse will also be going to the MRF. The commercial rates were adjusted by the weighted CPI calculation for the collection portion of the rate, and by the landfill gate fee increase for disposal. The commercial rates do Nr T include the use of a MRF. The breakdown between collection and disposal for current year commercial rates shown has been adjusted per correspondence between Sonny Jensen and the City Attorney, James G. Rourke Esq. If it were decided at some point to take the commercial waste stream to a MRF the disposal portion of the rate would have to be adjusted to substitute the MRF fee for the landfill disposal fee shown on the attached schedule. If you should have any questions relating to the computation of rates please feel free to call either myself, or Jerry Stevens. Sincerely, Brad V. Berrett Controller cc: Jerry Stevens C' 18 -Jun -91 CITY OF TUSTIN COMPUTATION OF TRASH COLLECTION RATES JULY 1, 1991 TIME- CONTRACT CATEGORY/ SOURCE PERIOD PRIOR NEW X WEIGHT X -------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE HOURLY EARNINGS/ LOCAL 396 WAGES GASOLINE/ CPI (UNADJ) US CITY AVG ALL URBAN CONSUMERS (SS4701A) MOTOR TRUCKS/ PPI CODE 141106 GENERAL PURPOSE MACH & EQUIP/ PPI CODE 114 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS & EQUIP/ PPI CODE 116605 FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS PPI CODE 107 ALL OTHER, CPI LA/LONG BEACH/ANAHEIM (UNADJUSTED) ALL URBAN CONSUMERS, ALL ITEMS MAY 1990/91 10.55 10.80 2.41 0.3300 0.781 APRIL 1989/90 91.0 95.9 5.41 0.0900 0.481 MAY 1990/ 119.5 121.6 1.81 0.065 0.111 MAY 1991 MAY 1990/ 123.3 127.8 3.61 0.1325 0.481 MAY 1991 MAY 1990/ 116.7 118.8 1.81 0.0225 0.041 MAY 1991 MAY 1990/ 121.9 122.3 0.31 0.02 0.011 MAY 1991 APRIL 1990/91 134.20 140.70 4.81 0.3400 1.651 1.000 3.561 TOTAL ==::=: =::::: SOURCE: US DEPT OF LABOR; BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 213-252-7521 18 -Jun -91 CITY OF TUSTIN ADJUST TRASH COLLECTION RATES JULY 1, 1991 COLL DISPOSAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------- 1.0356 1.2817 -------- ---- CURRENT RATES* ---- ------- PROPOSED RATES------ COLL- DIS- COLL- DIS - CATEGORY --------- ECTION --------------------------- POSAL TOTAL ECTION ---------------- --------------------------- POSAL TOTAL ------- YD YD 1X 40.78 8.45 49.23 42.23 10.83 53.06 2X 60.16 16.91 77.07 62.30 21.67 83.97 3X 79.48 25.36 104.84 82.31 32.50 114.81 4X 98.87 33.82 132.69 102.39 43.35 145.73 5X 118.20 42.27 160.47 122.41 54.18 176.58 6X 137.54 50.73 188.27 142.43 65.02 ` 207.45 3 YD 1X 54.87 12.63 67.55 56.82 16.25 73.07 2X 78.71 25.36 104.07 81.51 32.50 114.01 3X 102.61 38.04 140.65 106.26 48.76 155.02 4X 124.66 50.73 175.39 129.10 65.02 194.12 5X 148.56 63.41 211.97 153.85 81.27 235.12 6X 172.41 76.09 248.50 178.54 97.52 276.07 4 YD 1X 57.38 16.91 74.29 59.42 21.67 81.10 2X 86.43 33.82 120.25 89.51 43.35 132.35 3X 115.07 50.73 165.80 119.16 65.02 184.18 4X 143.96 67.63 211.59 149.08 86.68 235.16 5X 172.87 84.54 257.41 179.02 108.35 287.38 6X 201.73 101.45 303.18 208.91 130.03 338.94 RESIDENTIAL 0 4.43 4.56 8.99 5.20 6.43 11.63 COMMERCIAL CANSM 4.85 4.56 9.41 5.62 6.43 12.05 *The commercial rates shown reflect the adjustment between disposal and service as submitted by Y. Jensen to James Rourke. The new commercial rates do NOT include the use of a MRF. Should it be decided at a later date to NRF the commercial waste stream the above proposed rates would have to be adjusted to substitute the NRF fee for the landfill disposal component shown above. **The residential rate proposed is as previously agreed to by Tustin and Great Western Reclamation. ***The commercial can rate was adjusted in accordance with the method used for resid- ential. The disposal continues to match the residential rate and the collection portion of the charge remains at $.42 above the residential rate (no CPI taken for 7/91 only). NEW BUSINESS N0. 1 P, D A 6-17; 91 Enter - Com ATE: JUNE 17 , `1991 t •, .. TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: RECYCLING CONTRACT NEGOTIATION TEAM SUBJECT: RECYCLING NEGOTIATION PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommended recycling program and authorize the City Manager to execute modifications to the current franchise Agreement with Great Western Reclamation, Inc., subject to approval of final documents by the City Attorney. BACKGROUND The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) requires cities and counties to reduce the quantity of wastes disposed in their jurisdictions by 25% by the year 1995 and 50% by the year 2000. AB 939 also requires the City to prepare a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) which will be coordinated and incorporated into the County's Integrated Waste Management Plan. As required by AB 939, the City's draft SRRE is currently under review by the California Integrated Waste Management Board, adjacent cities, the County and the local County task force. The first public hearing on the SRRE will be held by the City Council on July 1, 1991. In order to meet AB 939 and SRR goals, the City of Tustin must increase its' waste diversion rate through recycling. Recycling alternatives explored in the City's Draft SRR Element include: curbside collection mobile collection drop-off centers buy back centers public area recycling receptacles commercial, industrial & government recycling material recovery facilities salvage operations Generally the two most successful techniques for achieving the greatest diversion results are curbside collection and/or the use of a material recovery facility. According to the City's Draft SRR Element's Waste Generation Study, 81,647 tons per year of solid City Council Report Recycling Program June 17, 1991 Page 2 waste is generated in the City of Tustin. Of the total diversion, only 14,484 tons per year or 17% is waste stream generated by single family uses. Since a large portion of the City of Tustin's population resides in multiple family housing and a large portion of the City's waste stream is commercial/ industrial users, a curbside collection program would have a marginal impact on the amount of solid waste diverted from disposal in the City. It is, therefore, staff's opinion that utilization of a material recovery facility (MRF) is the most desireable recycling approach. Under this arrangement all trash is taken to a facility where recyclable materials are sorted. This program will also eliminate the need for residents to sort their trash and maintain separate barrels for recycled materials. By using the MRF program, the City will be guaranteed to meet the AB 939 recycling requirements and it will not require additional capital outlay. Provisions of Section 11 of the Agreement for Collection and Transportation of Solid Waste Refuse between the City and Great Western Reclamation provides that Great Western respond to any City of Tustin terms and conditions for a recycling program. As a result of lengthy negotiations, Great Western has agreed to the MRF recycling program requested by Tustin which will require modifications to the current franchise agreement (Agreement). The proposed modifications to the agreement reflect changes to existing rates charged by Great Western. Utilization of a MRF and the need for an accurate data base on solid waste diversion necessitated negotiating new charges for solid waste collection. The proposed new charges take into account the County gate fees, MRF fees and the cost of hauling. The gate fee is incorporated with the MRF fee and will be a direct charge to the City. Any increases in gate fees at County landfills will be a direct pass through and the City will pay 750 of any of these actual cost increases. The hauling charge paid to Great Western covers the cost of pick-up of the trash and transport to the MRF. The following is a summary of current and proposed modifications to residential rates: Hauling Disposal Total Charge Charge Charges Current Charges 4.43 4.56 8.99 Proposed Charges 5.20 6.43 11.63 City Council Report Recycling Program June 17, 1991 Page 3 The proposed hauling charge of $5.20 per month is based upon the Consumer Price Index (CPI) formula set forth in the current agreement and additional costs associated with implementation of the recycling program. For example, Great Western has revised it's routes to ensure that the City is only billed for trash collected in Tustin. The hauling charge will also not be subject to a CPI adjustment until July 1, 1992, but the disposal charge may be adjusted in the event the County of Orange increases landfill disposal fees after July 1, 1991. The rate would include reycling at the MRF operated by Sunset Environmental, Inc. as approved at $36.75 per ton or approximately $2.56 per dwelling unit for use of the MRF. This compares favorably with costs of recycling programs in other southland communities. The estimated residential hauling charge is based upon an estimated average of 81 pounds of disposable solid waste per single-family residence per month. This assumed poundage will be used for the entire July -1, 1991 to June 30, 1992 period. If, at the end of that period, disposal weight records disclose that the actual average weight per single-family residence is other than 81 pounds, the parties agree to adjust to the actual tonnage for purposes of calculating the disposal charge per residence for the period July 11 1992 through June 30, 1993. Similar annual adjustments would be made each June during the term of the Agreement so as to reflect actual pounds per residence per month. All future disposal charge adjustments would be based on actual tonnage records for the prior year. - The actual assessment amounts for residential accounts and identified costs for recycling to be applied against commercial, and industrial accounts will be considered at a future meeting. A summary of specific provisions of the tentatively negotiated agreement with Great Western involve the following major terms: All trash will be taken by Great Western Reclamation to Sunset Environmental, a MRF in Irvine. The MRF will sort the trash for recyclables and haul the balance to the landfill. Great Western will guarantee achievement of all AB 939 diversion goals and pay all fines and penalties that may be assessed by the State if AB 939 requirements are not met. f City Council Report Recycling Progr-am June 17, 1991 Page 4 Great Western will reimburse City consultant costs of preparation of its Source Reduction and Recycling Element and staff time necessary to coordinate said preparation. Great Western will provide "at demand" curbside pick-up of all large items and white goods in the City at no additional cost to accounts. Such collection service will enable residents to simply call Great Western to discard large items such as furniture and white goods which are not picked up as part of regular trash collection. In coordination with the City, Great Western will provide a Public Awareness Program on City's Source Reduction & Recycling Program. Said program will include at least production and mailing of two brochures twice a year during the next five years. These brochures will focus on residential and commercial recycling programs. A copy of the draft agreement for City Council approval will be transmitted under separate cover. z z ). 14� R Nault Finance Director RN:CAS:kbc\recyclin.cas r Christine A. Shingle o Assistant City Mana June 20, 1991 V TY O F JUN 2 6 .. _ RAN G E INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 1200 N. Main Street. Suite 201 Santa Ana, California 92701 (714) 568-4160 FAX (714) 834-0754 TO: ALL CITY MANAGERS FRANK R. BOWERMAI Director and Chief Enginee VICKI L. WILS01 Assistant Direcic This •is to inform you that on April 23, 1991 the Orange County Board of Supervisors approved a revision of the landfill gate fees. It is our understanding that Mr. Lee Risner of the Waste Management Commission has previously supplied information to you on the gate fee revision.. Attached for your information is a disposal fee schedule effective July 1, 1991. If you have any questions on this issue please contact Loletta Barrett, Administration Division Manager at (714) 568-4171. Sincerely, Frank R. Bowerman, P.E., Fellow ASCE Director and Chief Engineer INMD/LB:da/8217 ORANGE COUNTY RECYCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPOSAL FEES EFFECTIVE JULY 19 1991 1. Standard Landfill Fee Disposal fees are charged on a per ton basis for all vehicles except minimum charge vehicles. The net weight of a load is multiplied by the standard landfill fee of $22.75 per ton. The total is computed to the nearest whole dollar for cash paying customer and to the exact amount for deferred charge customers. (If scales are not operational, the flat -rate schedule shown on the reverse shall apply.) 2. Minimum Charge Vehicles Minimum charge vehicles include automobiles, automobiles with trailers, pick up trucks and small trucks (under 7000 lbs. gross vehicle weight). Automobile fees are $5 per vehicle. Automobiles with trailers, pickup trucks and small truck fees are $10 per vehicle. No hard -to -handle fee is charged. 3. Hard -to -Handle Surcharge A surcharge of $5.00 per ton is added to the standard landfill disposal fee for hard -to -handle materials. Hard -to -handle items are any item which, due to its size, weight or other physical characteristic, requires special handling or presents a safety or operations problem. Following are examples of items which are subject to these fees: • Automobile/truck seats. • Mattress/ box springs. • Large tree trunks, branches, poles, and pipes over 14 inches in diameter and/or over 4 foot in length. • Digested and de -watered sewage sludge. • Demolition material- 3 foot or larger concrete blocks, or any .inert items mixed with rebar. • Nuisance materials (dust, powders). • Empty, triple rinsed 55 gallon drums from commercial or industrial generators (acceptance requires approval of an Integrated Waste Management Department inspector). 4. Tire Disposal Fee Loads of five or more tires will be charged $51.25 per ton. 5. Items Not Accepted • Offal (animal parts, body parts, non -autoclave infectious waste, manure). • Liquids (containerized or not), chemicals, hazardous wastes, fuel tanks, mufflers, brake linings, batteries, and asbestos. • Any item over 6 foot in any dimension. 6. Upon approval by the IWMD Director and Chief Engineer, or designee, the disposal fee may be waived for inert materials including soil, rock, concrete or asphalt which, in his/her judgement, are of value to the operation of the landfill. 1WMD/LB:da/8233 6-17-91 COUNTY u. ORANGE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEM,.., DEPARTMENT FLAT RATE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JULY 11 1991* Gross Vehicle_WeiQht (GVW Under 7,000 (GVW) 02 --- Passenger Car Minimum FEE PER VEHICLE 04 --- Pickup Truck Minimum 10 n/a Over HARD TO CODE DESCRIPTION K -FACTOR STANDARD HANDLE Pickup or Passenger Car w/Trailer Cubic Yards CLASS I - REFUSE COLLECTION V HICLES 08 3.01 Small Truck 30 36 --- Transfer Truck 20.00 $455 $555 40 Under 15 --- 4.69 107 130 42 15 - 24 2 Axle Side or Rear Loader 5.61 128 156. 44 25 - 29 2 Axle Front Loader 6.58 150 183 46 30 - 34 3 Axle Side Loader 7.50 171 208 48 35 - 39 3 Axle Front Loader 8.47 193 235 50 Over 39 --- 9.38 213 260 L Under 21 Construction Drop -Off Box 9.68 220 269 M 21 - 30 Regular Drop -Off Box 9.08 207 252 N 31 - 40 Regular Drop -Off Box 9.24 210 256 0 Over 40 Regular Drop -Off Box 9.92 226 275 P Under 10 Compacting Drop -Off Box 3.08 70 85 Q 10 - 20 Compacting Drop -Off Box 7.00 159 194 R 21 - 30 Compacting Drop -Off Box 8.46 192 235 S 31 - 40 Compacting Drop -Off Box 8.31 189 231 T .41 - 45 Compacting Drop -Off Box 10.50 239 291 U Over 45 Compacting Drop -Off Box 11.52 262 320 CLASS II - OTHER VEHICLES Gross Vehicle_WeiQht (GVW Under 7,000 (GVW) 02 --- Passenger Car Minimum 5 n/a 04 --- Pickup Truck Minimum 10 n/a Over 7,000 (GVW) Av. Tare 06 2.00 Pickup or Passenger Car w/Trailer .44 10 n/a 08 3.01 Small Truck 1.60 36 44 10 3.50 Medium Truck 2.40 55 67 11 4.25 Medium Truck w/Trailer 2.78 63 77 12 5.00 2 Axle Truck 3.60 82 100 13 7.25 Large Two -Axle Truck 3.60 82 100 14 10.29 3 Axle Truck 7.14 162 198 16 15.25 3 Axle w/Trailer 9.38 213 260 18 16.11 Tractor -Trailer Combination 9.38 213 260 20 15.01 Tractor w/Double Trailers 12.90 293 358 CLASS III - SPECIALIZED VEHICLES HARD TO VEHICLE TYPES K -FACTOR TYPE HANDLE 32 Sludge - By Weight - $27.75 per ton 15 33F Sludge - Tractor -Trailer Combo - Flat Rate 15.00 F33 $416 34F Sludge - 2 Axle - Flat Rate 4.80 F34 133 35F Sludge - 3 Axle - Flat Rate 9.60 F35 266 36F Sludge - 3 Axle w/Trailer - Flat Rate 17.60 F36 488 37F Sludge - 53L - Flat Rate 17.60 F37 488 *Disposal fees are charged on a per ton basis for all vehicles except minimum charge vehicles. If scales are not operational, the flat rate schedule shall apply. **Tires - Loads of five or more tires will be charged $51.25 per ton. Finance Department NOTICE OF FILING OF REPORT AND OF PUBLIC HEARING City Of Tustin 15222 Del Amo Avenue Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 544-8890 FAX (714) 832-0825 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 5473, et seq. of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, the City Council of the City of Tustin has authorized and directed the preparation of a written report containing a description of each parcel of real property receiving solid waste collection services and facilities and the amount of the charge proposed to be levied upon each parcel for the collection of solid waste for the fiscal year 1991-1992, and the City Council has set July 15, 1991 at 7 o'clock p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City of Tustin, at 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California, as the time and place when the City Council will hear and consider all objections or protests, if any, to the aforesaid report and proposed charges. If the report is adopted by the City Council, the charges will be placed on the tax -roll and collected in the same manner, by the same persons and at the same time as general property taxes. A copy of said report is on file in the office of the City Clerk and is available for inspection during regular business hours. The City Council has authorized and directed the City Clerk to publish this notice once a week for two successive weeks, on July 5, and July 11, 1991 in the Tustin News, a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Tustin. Dated: June 26 , 1991 Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk City of Tustin a:hearing.pub N d N .0 M E IA. o 0. N ! dZ IA f- j N i t7t .r IA 13 : H a' W LL J IL d V 1 I W F- a- U c. a! .- ! 3 N a �o ►. w o i f- o I-- H Co 13-c cu a• w tL' t>: PJ W W N i W N d N J•o W Wwo% N wc% ( =• AE� N OF -a > M> N WN r t• A i N Mmu O OOQ w ONa ? Wdd L. I-Z atU O (COO ? vu W V V O d i X u 0) CLIA! O xW i - - O NX - CI- O MCI- 0- O- ( ca -O-04CW 1 OCWW M WOw o oZ c.. WME i w u sax •� n. 40 i o=1 o n. o z o "--F- c? JOJ M aria 00> c Ov+m ! s; a o W W aCLDW a— •o O%Oo O; Sao N ONO Mm- m-ro 6vO a XN ! Xcu X(U QX -IL N in N c at to _ N I ct E I fro 1 I -o 1 t -•o 1%0%0 i oet oar oMt- mQ: tn-- tn• to— U t Q'1 I a'1 V•1 MIv • L x M 1 M; 1 M 1 M� 1 M� i ro N to co- ' CO- 40D - D"' -CL OL1- t- M M M M CrIb cm a i j J J N m ; -. N IA i Q W- M N a+v! w w i w ! J aJ Oa > >o a w J _j a% F t -U O• Q F- a+N N !A W N W Q W N f- - W J =JIT• Z I-ww >+E O JO N WN: A Uo (3 CLU3 - r ro! a •+CLQ •r oNa o •-•oa -� d t, c :o C- Z: a mt3U VU a MQU W EQ— -+ N a W ; w X F- N to 3 "Z 4. CLIA Z -Z - O (Ax;. to Z 0-w Z o WOW W www to O d 7 O C. L; �- Wim-- i 3mz w 0 i F-NZ- F- CL Ci ! -- t9 --1- O -+ v w v Z N 3 w 3 i c r- I NN i oo> v =oV'Q N CLot, �►-_ 2 N UNC 0. - m W QNW N <0%<! O Q Oi •- E -F- 1 ENO •- UNJ • i ro O do XPJ , Xtil xN ¢X-- i 'i0 U) tL rp V} ! QV ivr •- r -- N d E 1 r -o 1 No 1 No .1%0%D -f-4 oma; •• 4s<1 to -- I to -- ' to j O U t v1 11 �tl y MI pC t.. x111 Irl:IM IMI IMS- i ro ro ro O}. -i co �^ x CL ; ro h- a% I � �o I IA. j o w 1n I ~ N N CLD Ir ' w 41'0 i ; *T F- ip d L- Q W O •- CL tL' R' Ir .-� W U ( z co I o .-• F--r.O 3 J !_ Q N U U.O N CL Q i J I N 1O cr+ N d 2 ( j W I o o• N Jo! Q Q/T 1- 27U j 7E S H= N 0f -<t: -y (no-.# U�t d 1 r ro� a >><<i-N CLNU w ww< 7w f -Z J dJU QN! O EMU W -GDM U - E d E > J j ato� o XM d "< - o _jXF- ' O- ! _ z M -o -C U ! Uw o wow j L ! pC •- «• i to to E ' - t9 3 to O CL 4+ : CD W CLD F- O 3 -- a •- Z O tL I cl to xtntn I JOJ o Moa o JO3 ! ! 3 I. 4 d V 3 OL O W �- d �- w CLO Q w I o I S CL o N U N O V IL Z i i r 3 IT i ro 0 r0 QX+- xtu XN < X - N W tn ! dE 1�.A 1No tNo to�O i d d to O O U)- to •- to,* o U c 1 v t.x1A IM-- IM IM IM^ ZD ^ ' CLF- L M M M M F- v% O• CYN o