HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1972 02 07 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
TUSTIN CItY COUNCIL
February 7, 1972
CALL TO ORDER Meeting called to order at 7:50 p.m. by Mayor Coco.
II.
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE Led by Mayor Coco.
III.
INVOCATION Given by Councilman L. Miller.
IV.
ROLL CALL Present: Councilmen: Coco, C. Miller, Marsters,
L. Miller, Oster.
Absent: Councilmen: None
Others present: Asst. City Administrator Dan
Blankenship
City Attorney James Rourke
Asst. City Administrator - Community
Development, Ken Fleagle
City Clerk Ruth Po~
V.
PUBLIC
HEARINGS NONE.
VI.
CONSENT
CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - January 17, 1972, meeting.
2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS - in amount of $385,919.41
Moved by C. Miller, seconded by L. Miller that both
items on the Consent Calendar be approved. Car~
unanimously.
VII.
ORDINANCES
FOR
ADOPTION NONE.
(HOLTHE
AGREEMENT) AGREEMENT WITH HOLTHE DISPOSAL SERVICE
Mr. Blankenship explained that the agreement with
Holthe Disposal Service expired on December 31, 1971,
and that since that date, Holthe has been providing
service on an interim basis while negotiating an
agreement for service for a temporary period of
four to six months. Discussions had been concluded
that afternoon and it was felt that an equitable
arrangement had been reached. The rate agreed upon
is $1.24 per meter for a four-month period retro-
active to January 1, for 4,107 meters currently
within the City, with the number of meters to remain
constant during the period of this temporary agree-
ment. The total cost to the City will be $2,321.32.
In addition, the Holthes had requested that this
contract go out for bids at the earliest.possible
date, with award about May 1.
Moved by L. Miller, seconded by Marsters that ~taff
recommendations on this matter be approved for the
interim period specified. Carried unanimously.
Council Minutes
2/7/72 Page 2
VIII.
ORDINANCES
FOR
INTRODUCTION 1. ORDINANCE NO. 536
An Ordinance of the City of Tustin, California,
REZONING PROPERTY ON APPLICATION NO. Z.C. 71-
228 OF DAN JONES, ET AL.
Location: Southwest corner of Seventeenth
Street and Prospect Avenue.
Moved by L. Miller, seconded by Oster that Ordinance
No. 536 have first reading by title only. Carried
unanimously.
Ordinance title read by the secretary.
IX.
RESOLUTIONS 1. RESOLUTION NO. 72-7
A Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Tustin, California, CALLING AND GIVING
NOTICE OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY
OF APRIL, 1972, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN
OFFICERS OF SAID CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE
PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE ,STATE OF CALIF-
ORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES.
2. RESOLUTION NO. 72-8
A Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Tustin, California, SETTING DATE FOR
HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE OF NAME
OF THAT PORTION OF VILLAGE DRIVE WEST OF
YORBA STREET, WHICH IS WITHIN THE CITY OF
TUSTIN.
3. .RESOLUTION NO. 72-9
A Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Tustin, California, OPPOSING THE SERVICE
OF ARREST AND BENCH WARRANTS BY THE ORANGE
COUNTY MARSHAL'S OFFICE.
4. RESOLUTION NO. 72-10
A Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Tustin, MAKING FINDINGS ON CHAPTER 27 OF
THE 1911 ACT PETITION AND INSTRUCTING THE
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS TO PROCEED WITH
THE STEPS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
CERTAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS.
Councilman Marsters asked that Resolution No. 72-9
be removed from consideration at this time an
accordance with staff recommendations.
Moved by Marsters, seconded by Oster thau Resolutions
72-7, 72-8 and 72-10 be read by title only. Carried
unanimously.
Titles of Resolutions 72-7, 72-8 and 72-10 read by
the secretary.
Council Minutes
2/7/72 Page 3
Movedby C. Miller, seconded by L. Miller that
Resolutions 72-7, 72-8 and 72-10 be passed and
~. Carried. Ayes: Coco, C. Miller, Marsters,
L. Miller,~ Noes: none. Absent: none.
Mayor Coco explained for the benefit of the audience
that adoption of Resolution No. 72-9, which opposed
service of arrest and bench warrants by the Orange
County Marshal's Office, is no longer necessitated,
inasmuch as the courts have now agreed that city
police agencies will continue to serve these
warrants.
OLD
BUSINESS 1. DEVELOPMENT PREVIEW COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
(Continued from 1/17/72)
Mayor Coco announced that the Council had inter-
viewed four applicants (William F. Reed, Gene
Miller, John Jamieson, and Beverly Miller) prior
to this evening's meeting.
Councilman Oster stated that as a result of the
interviews, he felt that William F. Reed was the
best qualified candidate.
Moved by Oster, seconded by Marsters that William
F. Reed be appointed as a member of the Development
Preview Commission to fill the unexpired term of
Robert Hall, with term to expire September 5, 1973.
Carried unanimously.
The City Council then directed that a resolution of
commendation be prepared for adoption and presenta-
tion to Robert Hall at the next regular meeting,
for his service on the Development Preview Commission.
2.' PROPOSAL FOR ACQUIRING SURPLUS PROPERTY AT
BENETA WAY. (Continued from 1/17/72)
Mr. Blankenship recommended withholding action on
the County's proposal involving lease-option agree-
ments with the County and the School District at
this time due to the possibilityof a more advanta-
geous proposal from the County at a future date.
The County of Orange is currently attempting to
obtain 100% discount from the State on surplus
lands earmarked for park and recreational develop-
ment, as part of its 1972 legislative program.
Favorable consideration of this proposal by the
State would benefit the County and could ultimately
benefit the City of Tustin.
MaTor Coco said that he and the City Administrator
had discussed this with Supervisor Ralph Clark, and
he may be able to assist the City in obtaining the
surplus land at a 100% discount.
Moved by Councilman Oster, seconded by L. Miller
that this matter'be tabled and that the staff report
to the Council on negotiations with the County at
their earliest opportunity. Carried unanimously.
Council Minutes
2/7/72 Page 4
3, JOINT CITY-COUNTY PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION.
OF STORM DRAIN IN BRYAN AVENUE FROM BROWNING
TO RED HILL. (Continued from 1/17/72)
Councilman C. Miller stated that the City Engineer:s
January 31 report discusses the priority of this
project primarily as compared with other flood control
projects, rather than with other capital improvemenn
items, such as certain street improvements, etc.
He felt that an expenditure of $110,000 might possibly
be better applied to a project more visible and more
immediately beneficial to the City.
Mayor Coco noted that there is a February 14 deadline
on acceptance of the County's 50-50 cost sharing
offer, and expressed his concern that development
of the Newport-Main-Bryan triangle will contribute
more runoff at the intersection of Red Hill and Bryan.
Mr. Blankenship stated that a joint project at this
time would be advantageous to the City, not only from
a financial standpoint. Irregular City boundaries
have heretofore caused right-of-way problems pre-
venting implementation of pro3ects to which Gas Tax
funds can be applied. Proceeding on this project
would not cause any significant problem as there
are only limited projects to spend Gas Tax monies on
until such time as annexations somewhat regularize
the City ' s boundaries.
Moved by Oster, seconded by L. Miller that the
concept of participation in joint City-County
storm drain in Bryan Avenue from Browning to
Red Hill be approved. Carried unanimously.
4. TUSTIN TILLER DAYS REPORTS
Mr. Fleagle announced that a request had been
received to continue this matter for two weeks in
order to allow the Tustin Jaycee~ and Tustin Tiller
Days, Inc., to coordinate their plans before report-
ing to the Council.
MoVed by L. Miller, seconded by Ost~r that this
matter be continued to the next regular Council
meeting. Carried unanimously.
XI.
NEW
BUSINESS 1. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT - POPULATION ESTIMATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
~ Moved by L. Miller, seconded by Oster that the
Mayor and Cit~ Clerk be authorized to execut~
agreement with the State of California Population
Research Unit for a City population estimate.
Carried unan~mousiy.
2. TRAVEL REQUEST - INSTITUTE FOR PLANNING
COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Fleagle explained that the Planning Commission
had recommended Council authorization of Planning
Commissioner Howard Larnard's attendance at the
.? Institute for Planning Commissioners in San Jose,
-_ February 23-25; the request included expenses,
which were noE expeeted to exceed $200.00. He
briefly described the program.
Council Minutes
2/7/72Page 5
Moved~by C. Miller, seconded by Marsters that this
travel reauest be aDproved, and that fu~dS~0~
expenses ~etranSferred from the unappropriated
reserve. Carried unanimously.
Councilman L. Miller requested that ~ranscript or
material on "How to Renew Small Cities", the subjec~
0f one of four concurrent workshops scheduled for
the Institute, be returned for Council information.
3. RECOMMENDATION FOR TUSTIN UNION HIGH SCHOOL
DISTRICT COMMUNITY SERVICE
Moved by Oster, seconded by L. Miller that the
Council formally request the Tustin Union High School
Board to give consideration to allocating Communi~
~Service Funds for lighting the tennis courts at
Tustin High School in the fiscal ~ear 1972-73.
Carried unanimously.
4. PROSPECT-IRVINE-NEWPORT ANNEXATION NO. 68
(REVISED)
Mr. Fleaale announced that this matter is scheduled
for hearing before the Local Agency Formation
Commission on February 9, 1972.
Moved by C. Miller, seconded by Marsters that the
Council request that the Local Agency Formation Com-
mission approve amendment of the boundaries of
Annexation No. 68. Carried unanimously.
5. FIRE SERVICE NEEDS
The Council agreed that they would like to meet
with the Fire Chief and Acting Police Chief to
discuss recommendations in Mr. Blankenship's
January 26 report relative to Fire Service needs.
Since it had been indicated that time is crucial
in implementing some of these recommendations,
the City Clerk was directed to try to reach Chief
Hilton and Lt. Heil.be telephone to arrange.a
meeting with the Council at the conclusion of the'
.public meeting and subsequent Personnel Session.
This matter was deferred pending discussions with
staff following the meeting.
6. AWARD OF BID - CONSTRUCTION OF NORTHEAST
CORNER OF INTERSECTION OF MAIN AND NEWPORT
Moved by C. Miller, seconded by ester that contract
for Chapter 27 construction at Newport and Main
be awarded ~o the low bidder, R. J. Noble, in the
amount of $4,705.17. Carried unanimously.
XI~.
OTHER
BUSINESS 1. EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEMS
Mr. Blankenship expanded on content of M~intenance
Superintendent's January 19 report by explaining
that approximately $1,500 could be saved by not
supplying emergency power to City Hall entirely.
To supply emergency power to the switchboard only~
an automatic ~elay switch would have to be installed
at each of two circuit breaker boxes which are
located in separate areas of two adjacent buildings
at 140 West Second. This step cannot be bypassed
Counci 1 Minutes
2/7/72' Page 6
by wiring into an existing line, since Edison
Company power and the generator would be on at
the same time, which would damage the generator
and possibly the building.
Councilman Oster asked that the staff work with
the Edison Company and Pacific Telephone during
the next two weeks to formulate a plan for
emergency power to the buildings.
Mr. Bud Jackley of the Edison Company indicated
from the audience that he would be willing to work
with the staff.
Moved by Oster, seconded by C. Miller that this
matter be continued to the next regular meeting.
Carried unanimously.
2. JOINT POWERS CIVIC CENTER-LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION
Mr. Blankenship stated that the administrative staff
has requested that the Board of Supervisors continue
this matter for four weeks in order to allow addi-
tional negotiations. He asked for Council reaction
to the County's attitude that the site for a library
be donated by the City, andits insistence on a
prime location (corner of Centennial and Main).
Councilman C. Miller suggested that in view of
reports, there may be little or nothing on which
to negotiate. over the next four weeks.
Mayor Coco reported a softening in the County's
attitude about donation of the land in that it
now appears that they would accept the land in
perpetuity for library use with reversion to the
City upon discontinuance of that use. He felt that
an additional four-week negotiating period might
be useful if one or both of Tustin's Supervisors
(Caspers and Clark) could be of assistance. When
questioned about this situation at a meeting of
Fifth District mayors with Supervisor Caspers last
week, Mr. Caspers had indicated he would attempt
to alleviate the problem of the Library applying
his directive about donation of land for libraries
too literally in this case.' Mayor Coco recommended
extending the negotiations.
It was the consensus of the Council that negotiations
on this matter be continued by the staff and that
they be kept informed of any progress. They also
agreed that they were in complete support of the
staff in these negotiations.
3. IMPROVEMENT OF YORBA STREET SOUTH OF SEVENTEENTH
Mr. Blankenship stated that the City Engineer had
reviewed Mr. A1 Enderle's request concerning cost-
sharing in this project, and his findings as con-
tained in his January 28 report to the City
Administrator included a recommendation that the
cost-sharing proposal be modified to bring it
within the guidelines of Council Policy 40-4
relative to responsibility for general public
improvements.
It was the consensu~ of the Council that they were
in support of the City Engineer's findings; the
Council requested that Mr. Enderle be advised of this.
Council Minutes
2/7/72 Page 7
4. PROPOSED ANNEXATION - NISSON ROAD
The=~Council,.hadnoobjection to this annexation being
filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission on
February 11 for hearing by that Body on March 8, 1972.
5. COUNTY SR DISTRICT, ORDINANCE 2517
The Council concurred in the Community Development
Director's recommendation that the Orange County
Planning Commission be advised that there is no
objection to the designation of the Santa Ana
Freeway as a scenic corridor with the application
of the SR (Sign Restrictions) District regulations
to the unincorporated areas of the ~Santa Ana Freeway
within' Tustin's sphere of influence.
6. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION - 1971 ANNUAL
REPORT TO THE COUNCIL
The Council commended the Parks and Recreation
Commission for an excellent report.
7. COUNCIL CONCERNS: SANTA ANA DENIES PREZONE
The Council directed that an acknowledgment be sent
to the Santa Ana Planning Commission relative to
their denial of a prezone request involving land on
the north side of Main Street west of the Newport
Freeway between Pasadena and Williams. The proposed
zoning and intended high-density development had
been opposed by the City of Tustin and the Tustin
Elementary School District. '
8. NEWPORT BEACH RESOLUTIONS RE: UNDERGROUNDING
OF UTILITIES
The Council directed that Resolutions 7609 and 7610
of the City of Newport Beach relative to under-
grounding of utilities be examined by the staff to
determine suitability of similar action by the
Tustin City Council, with report at the next Council
meeting.
'9. COMMENDATION OF MUTUAL AID PARTICIPANTS
Letters are to be directed from the Tustin City
Council to the governing bodies of cities and
the County, whose fire units assisted during the
office building'fire of January 21, 1972, and
to the Santa Ana fireman (Bergen) who was injured
during the fire. The letters are to be prepared
by the staff for sagnature by the Council at the
next meeting.
10. REPRESENTATION AT MEETINGS
League Executive Meeting 2/10/72 Len Miller to attend.
Mayors' Select Committee 2/10/72 C. Miller to attend.
Cfollows League meeting) L. Miller will sub-
stitute if C. Miller
is still out of town.
Community Development 2/11/72 No Council
Committee (League) representative.
Mayors Task Force 2/17/72 L. Miller to attend.
(Intergovernmental Staff to advise him
Council) of ~'!~ails (time,etc.)
Council Minutes
2/7/72 Page 8
11. SISTER CITY PROJECT - SHIRAHAMA, JAPAN
The Council agreed that the proposal submitted by
Terry Suzuki, Chairman of Southern California
Japan Sister Cities Council, for a sister city
program between Tustin and the City of Shirahama
in the State of Wakayama, Japan, be explored,
providing no financial commitment is involved.
12. CONTRIBUTION TO ORANGE COUNTY PRESS CLUB
Moved by Oster, seconded by Marsterm that S25.00
be appropriated as a contribution to the Orang~
County Press Club for an ad in their official
yearbook. Carried by 4-1 vote, C. Miller voting
no.
13. SIGNAL AT NEWPORT AVENUE OFF-RAMP
At the request of Mrs. Lee Wagner, 17331 Jacaranda,
Tustin, staff was directed to report on the status
of plans to install a traffic signal on Newport
Avenue at its Santa Aria Freeway off-ramp, in County
territory.
14. SIDEWALKS IN DOWNTOWN AREA
Replying to questioning by Mrs. Lee Wagner relative
tO sidewalk construction in the downtown area,
Councilman C. Miller referred to a portion of
the City Engineer's February 2 report to the City
Administrator (regarding Chapter 27 petition to
improve Laguna Road adjacent to Greinke Petroleum)
stating that "recent changes in the Chapter 27
portion of the Streets and Highways Code permit
the City Council upon their own motion to order the
installation of street improvements fronting on
any property (where the City has sufficient right-
of-way) without a petition from the property owners
and without 50% of the improvements having previously
been constructed."
MOved by C. Miller, seconded by Marsters that the
staff report at the next regular meeting on the steps
necessary to order installation of street improve-
ments as provided for by above-referenced changes
in Chapter 27 portion of the Streets and Highways
Code. Carried unanimously.
15. CITIZEN COMMENTS: MR. TOM KEELY
Mr. Tom Kelly, 330 E1 Camino Real, Tustin, addressed
the Council about his dissatisfaction with lack of
progress in redevelopment of the downtown area since
.. adoption of the E1 Camino Real Development Plan
(Specific Plan No. 1) last year. He felt that
parking requirements are inequitable and unrealistic
and that related relief measures are impractical.
These factors serve to discourage new development
on the street, which in turn denies the City a
revenue base it needs. He suggested an amendment
to Specific Plan NO. 1 to reduce parking require-
ments, development of a schedule and budget for
implementation of the public works portion of the
ordinance, public relations campaign to "sell"
~ -~ 'the area, and consideration of establishment of a
redevelopment agency.
Council Minutes
developments in the central town area. Pre~existing
conditions must be corrected by the property owners
themselves. He noted that the ordinance had been
rewritten and provided a reduction in parking
requirements in the sense that it offered alterna~
tives which are not available in other areas of
the City; that implementation of the public works
portion of the ordinance is underway, and cited
examples; that public relations may be needed in
many areas but that expenditure of public funds
therefor cannot be justified; and that establish-
ment of a redevelopment agency would be deemed
unacceptable.
Councilman C. Miller stated that some means other
than a redevelopment agency will have to be found
to solve problems on E1 Camino Real, inasmuch as
under the Redevelopment Acts, more vacant land
tends to be created. He was opposed to this con-
cept, and felt that it was not applicable to this
situation.
Councilman L. Miller stated that in deliberations
by the T.N.T. Committee, the Chamber of Commerce,
Downtown Business Association, etc., attempts had
been made to apply a certain type of character to
the street to bring in more trade and traffic,
but that most decisions ultimately ended with
the business property owners.
In reply to questioning, Mr. Fleagle stated that
the main obstacle to development seems to be the
price of the land and cost of improvements versus
the expected return on the property. He felt
that a workable solution to the parking situation
is a cash contribution to acquire public parking
for common use paid for by the people who develop
their lots. Elimination of parking restrictions
would not be desirable because it was felt that
such action would increase land values but would
not promote actual construction. Mr. Fleagle
mentioned a possible consolidation of undeveloped
property (former packing house site, unincorporated
section on the south side of Main Street west of
Newport, and Mr. Prescott's acreage on Sixth Street)
into one development plan which would bring new
life to surrounding areas.
Councilman Oster felt that redevelopment would not
occur on E1 Camino Real un'~il vacant areas are
developed. Government cannot solve the problem
until a few major property owners take some action.
In reply to a question by Mrs. Lee Wagner,
Mr. Blankenship stated that there had been an
$8,000 allocatl6n for decorative street lighting
on E1 Camino Real in the 1971-72 Budget, and offered
to report on ~he.status of plans for the proposed
lighting at the next meeting.
Mr. "Speed" Schuster, 12901 Eveningside Drive,
supported previous statements that the property
owners mus cooperate to encourage growthin
the downtown area.
Council Minutes
2/7/72 Page 10
16. REQUEST FOR PROCLAMATION
Mr. Norman Ko, 131 Hall Circle, Tustin, requested
that the week of February 20-26 be proclaimed
Engineers Week in Tustin, in connection with
National Engineers Week.
Mayor Coco, with the consent of the Council, agreed
to support Engineers Week, and instructed the Staff
to confer with Mr. Ko about details of the proclama-
tion.
XIII.
ADJOURNMENT Mayor Coco at 9:59 p.m. declared the meeting
adjourned to a Personnel Session.
CALL TO ORDER The public portion of the meeting reconvened at
"' 10:42 p.m. following a Personnel Session and a
discussion period with the Fire Chief about Fire
Service needs.
NEW
BUSINESS 5. FIRE SERVICE NEEDS
Ma~or Coco briefly enumerated the four recommendations
for improved fire service as stated in the Assistant
City Administrator ' s January 26 report.
Mr. Blankenship introduced a fifth recommendation,
for purchase of a 1958 Seagrave 65-foot aerial
ladder at a cost of $10,500, which would improve
Tustin's fire rating.
A discussion followed among the Council concerning
the recommendations and which should be implemented
at this time.
'Councilman Oster stated his support for the purchase
of this equipment for the City, particularly because
of industrial development in the south Tustin area.
Councilman C. Miller stated that modification of the
1956 Seagrave fire engine is essential, as is the
recruitment of an additional firemen, and that the
City should begin moving on the South Tustin Fire
Station, but felt that eventually some type of
joint powers fire service arrangement would have
to be worked out among cities in this area and that
pursuit of that goal should be a matter of policy.
Councilman L. Miller suggested that the matter of
· a joint powers communication agreement be explored
by the staff, with a view toward inclusion of Santa
Aria in such an agreement.
Discussion continued among the Council on the
proposals, during which Mr. Blankenship described
the facilities planned for the south Tustin site.
Moved bl~ L. Miller, seconded by .Marsters that
a. essential modifications to 1956 Seagrave fire
engine at approximate cost of $13,000 be
I~ autho ri z e d;
b~ purchase of 1958 Seagrave 65-foot aerial ladder
at a cost of $10,500 be authorized;
'~ ' ' c. Joint Powers Communication Agreement on basis
Council Minutes
2/7/72 Page~l
of tri-city participation (to include Santa'~.~
Ana~ be ~eXplored by the staff, and the City~-
of Orange be so advised;
d. establishment of a South Tustin Fire station
on the City's Red Hill Avenue property, at
an estimated cost of $39,500, be authorized;
and
e. Recruitment of an additional fireman position
be authorized.
Carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Council,
Mayor Coco at 11:10 p.m. declared the meeting
adjourned to Tuesday, February 22, 1972.
MAYOR