Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPH 2 ACQUISITION PROP 10-21-91PUBLIC HEARING N0. 2 10-21-91 EN 4A AG 0 Inter - Coni DATE: OCTOBER 15, 1991 TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY EASEMENTS (SITE ADDRESS: 17575 VANDENBERG LANE) AND CERTIFICATION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION RECOMMENDATION At their meeting of October 7, 1991, the City Council postponed an eminent domain hearing for the acquisition of said easements. At this time, there is no longer a need for the eminent domain process to proceed, as an agreement has been reached between the City and the property owner '(Manchester Development Corporation). It is recommended that the City Council at their meeting of October 21, 1991 approve an Agreement between the City of Tustin and Manchester Development Corporation for the acquisition of certain real property easements for the development of a domestic water well, and authorize the Mayor to execute same. In addition, it is recommended that the City Council certify the Negative Declaration prepared for this project pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines and City Environmental Impact Report (EIR) requirements. BACKGROUND The aforementioned easements are required for the purpose of constructing a domestic water well. The subject property is a portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 88-179 filed as instrument No. 88-404-567 in Book 235, Pages 29 and 30 of Parcel Maps, Records of Orange County, California - site address 17575 Vandenberg Lane. The easements to be acquired are at the location of Assessor's Parcel No. 401-351-04, more particularly described as set forth in Exhibit "A" of the attached Agreement. An updated appraisal on the subject parcel was completed on May 20, 1991. A written offer to purchase the easements based on the appraisal was mailed to the owner on August 5, 1991 and was subsequently agreed to pursuant to the provisions contained in the attached Agreement. DISCUSSION The purpose of the acquisition of the property is to provide adequate land area for the construction of a domestic water well to provide for the overall enhancement of the City's domestic water supply. It is expected that the construction project will commence in late 1991 or early 1992. Actual drilling of the well is expected to last up to three weeks and will require 24 hours per day construction activity. Adequate mitigation measures will be taken to minimize any noise and lighting impacts. The finished product will include a one-story structure, architecturally compatible with the surrounding development, which will house the well. Landscaping around the structure will also be provided. Pursuant to the Agreement, the property owner agrees to sell and the City agrees to buy a permanent easement area to accommodate the construction of the well facility for the sum of $56,350.00 Because there will be a permanent net loss of six parking spaces, the proposed Agreement states that the City will work with the property owner to rearrange the parking layout, as is illustrated in Exhibit "B" of the Agreement. It should also be noted that it has been determined that the subject property has 270 existing on-site parking spaces; the original land use entitlement required 273 spaces. In addition, as noted above, the City's desire to acquire the easements will result in a net loss of an additional six parking spaces. As a condition precedent to the sale, the City shall agree to present to the Planning Commission a proposed zoning amendment which would add a modification to the existing parking requirement, so as to reduce the total number of required spaces from 273 to not more than 264 spaces. An initial study for the acquisition of this property and the construction of the water well has been completed and it has been determined that this project qualifies as a Negative Declaration per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and City Environmental Impact Report (EIR) guidelines. A copy of the Initial Study and Negative Declaration is attached for the City Council's review and subsequent certification. The City Attorney's Office prepared the attached Agreement and the Public Works Department and Community Development Department have reviewed and approved same. Bob Ledendecker Director of Public Works/City Engineer KP:RSL:kIb:WATERWELL 4f 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24' 25 26 27 28 THIS AGREEMENT municipal corporation Development Corporation AGREEMENT is entered into this 1991, by and between the (hereinafter "City"), (hereinafter referred to RECITALS day of City of Tustin, 1 and Manchester as "Developer") 4 WHEREAS, City desires to acquire a construction and permanent easement to located on Developer's property located at 17592 East 17th Street, Tustin, California; and WHEREAS, the purpose of said acquisition is to construct a one story water well facility; and WHEREAS, Developer agrees to sell to City said easements upon certain stated terms and conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved between City and Developer a follows: Section 1. Sale of Ea moments. Developer agrees to sell and City agrees to buy a permanent easement area to accommodate tho construction of a water well facility and a temporary construction easement needed to accomplish the construction of the facility Said easements are more particularly described in Exhibit "Al' attached and incorporated herein by reference. City agrees to pay the total sum of $56,350.00 for said easements. Section 2. Site Plan Layout. The construction of the water well facility will necessitate a rearrangement of the parkin layout on that portion of the Developer's property where the easements are to be located. Accordingly, City agrees to work witti developer to rearrange the parking layout and landscaping treatment adjacent to the easement areas, said costs to be paid by City. A site plan layout of this rearrangement of ingress and egress and parking layout is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated hereih by reference. Section 3. Resolution of Parking Requirement. City hao represented to Developer that Developer's original land us entitlement required 273 on-site parking spaces. However, City has counted the total number of only 270 parking spaces. In addition',, the City's desire to acquire the above-described easements will result in a net loss of an additional six parking spaces. As la condition precedent to the sale of the subject easements, City hereby agrees to present to the City's Planning Commission la proposed zoning amendment which would add a modification to the existing parking requirement so as to reduce the total number of required parking spaces from 273 to not more than 264 spaces. Upon -1- 1 21 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 151 161 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the City's legislative body's approval of the parking modification, the Director of Community Development and Planning shall give's notice to Developer that the City has formally approved of the revised parking requirement, which said notice shall remove the condition precedent to the sale. City shall absorb all permit costs associated with the, modification to the parking requirement. Section 4. Timeframe for Completion of Obligations. A. Within seven (7) working days of City's notice to', developer that the zoning parking amendment has been completed, City shall forward to Developer the formal easement documents for' execution, along with the required payment price. B. Developer shall execute the easement documents and return the originals to City by not later than five (5) working days from;' date of receipt. Section 5. Attorneys' Fees and Costs. If any action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to: reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief which he/she may be entitled. This - provision shall be construed as applicable to the entire Agreement.' Section 6. Entire Agregment. This Agreement constitute$ the entire understanding and agreement between the parties and supersedes all previous negotiations between them pertaining to the subject matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement has been advised by counsel of its choosing and in entering into this Agreement is relying upon its own investigation and evaluation and not upon any representations by any other party. It is the intend. of Agency and District that the payment herein provided constitute a full, complete, fair, and equitable adjustment for all financial and other impacts which have or may result to District during the term of the Plan. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed thi$ Agreement on the day and year hereinabove written. CITY OF TUSTIN By: ATTEST: Mary Wynn, City Clerk (Signatures Continued Page 3) -2- A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 APPROVED AS TO FORM: JRS:cas: R:10/10/91 (H306) MANCHESTER DEVELOPMENT COR By: Tit -3- =_ Vt `.i Y f vrF-MPORARY CONST SEMENT �/. 5395 `� •� . r ; �• � `� N. eB'.S3 t- 554 WELL SITE �Oe•�¢ /6 -. - EASEMENT 522' 2015= .P- se9.4 51 4 =-77.99' SO. oo' zz.Oo' Y.gNDEit/B.E'lqG WY 7LL S/TF isx,w-vs % T A Sa a J a0 x x x x' .K' ! �Q $JTZ -- — — TO BE REMO✓ED %-� _._. 10 SE RFMoWo r t� Wkw L" 11 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Title: Vandenberg Well Site - Property Acquisition and Well Construction File No.: P.W. #2932 Project Location: North side of Vandenberg Lane west of Prospect Avenue. Site Address: 17575 Vandenberg Lane, - Tustin, CA 92680 Project Description: Acquisition of Land and Construction of well. Project Proponent: City of Tustin Public Works Department Contact Person: Robert S. Ledendecker Telephone: (714)544-8890 ext. 281 The Public Works Department has conducted an initial study for the above project in accordance with the City of Tustin's procedures regarding implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, and on the basis of that study hereby find: That there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 1XI That potential significant affects were identified, but revisions will be included in the project plans and agreed to by the applicant that would avoid or mitigate the affects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. Said revisions are attached to and hereby made a part of this Negative Declaration. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not required. The Initial Study which provides the basis for this determination is on file at the Public Works Department, City of Tustin. The public is invited to comment on the appropriateness of this Negative Declaration during the review period, which begins with the public notice of the Negative Declaration. REVIEW PERIOD ENDS 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 3, 1991. DATED: Robert S. Ledendecker Director of Public Works/City Engineer CITY OF TUSTIN Community Development Department ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY FORM I. Background 1. Name of Proponent City of Tustin - Public works Department II. 2. Address and Phone Number of proponent 15222 Del Amo Avenue, Tustin, California 92690- (714)544-8890 26 0(714)544-8890 3. Date of Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checklist city of Tustin - Community Development Dept. 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Vandenberg Well Site - Property Acquisition and Well Construction Environmental Impacts (Explanations of -all "yes" and "maybe".answers are required on attached sheets.) • Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any ban, inlet or lake? X X X X Yes Ma be No g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emission or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X- C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperatures, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X- 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water m©vements, in either marine or Xresh water? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? .._ X CIO Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e. Discharge into surface waters, - or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or - turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of -ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X 4. 5. MF 7. Yes Ma be o i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number.of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals -(birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the -numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? - d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X X X 1X__ Yes Maybe No 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X X- 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? - X 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: - a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? R Yes M_aVbe No e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? C. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or - energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? X X X• X� X X X X X X X X X Yes Ma be No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X ' b. Exposure of people to potential X health hazards?. 18. Solid Waste. Will the proposal create additional solid waste requiring disposal by the City? X 19. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to 'public view? X 20. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x 21. Cultural Resources a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic. building, structure, or object? x C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X Yes Maybe No 22. Mandatory Findings of significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of -the environment substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant br animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to .achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will. endure well into the -future). X C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either.directly or indirectly? X III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation IV. Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Date I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measure described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT -REPORT is required. Signature Robert S. Ledendecker Director of Public Works/City Engineer x ATTACHMENT A Discussion of Environmental Evaluation Vandenberg Well Site --Property Acquisition and Well Construction July 31, 1991 Project Description Supplement - The proposed project is the acquisition of a portion of the parcel of property located on the north side of Vandenberg Lane west of Prospect Avenue (that portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 88-179 filed as Instrument No. 88-404567 in Book 235, Pages 29 and 30 of Parcel Maps, Records of Orange County, California - Site Address: 17592 E. 17th Street, Tustin, CA 92680) and the construction of a domestic water well at said location. The well pumping facilities will be housed in an enclosed structure roughly 20' X 101, which will be architecturally compatible with the existing development and all required landscaping will be installed. Thus, upon the project's completion, the well and appurtenant equipment will not be visible. Environmental Impacts 1. Earth a. Geologic Substructure For the test hole, existing formations within a maximum diameter of ten inches to a depth of up to approximately 1400 feet will be removed. During drilling, the hole will be kept open by circulating drilling fluid. After geophysical logging and water quality sampling is complete, the hole will be stabilized by filling with gravel and sealing with bentonite. For the production well, existing materials within a diameter of 16 inches to a depth of roughly 1400 feet will be removed. During drilling, the hole will be kept open by circulating drilling fluid. When the well is complete, the hole will be stabilized by casing grouted into place, well screen, and gravel pack. Drilling fluid on the walls of the hole will be removed during well development. SOURCES: City of Tustin Public Works Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. b. Soil The soil may be compacted for the block building, roughly 20 ft X 10 ft., to house the well and appurtenant equipment. SOURCES: City of Tustin Public Works Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: This impact will be limited to building site. 2. Air The proposed project will not result in any degradation of existing air quality based upon the South Coast Air Quality Management District guidelines for preparation of Environmental Impact Reports. SOURCES: South Coast Air Quality Management District standards for preparing EIR documents. MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 3. Water e. Water Quality The quality of the discharges during test hole/well construction varies with the particular activity. The water disposed of during drilling, water quality testing, and development may contain some fines. SOURCES: City of Tustin Public Works Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRES: The Project Specifications will prohibit the discharge of effluent containing solid materials. All drill cuttings, rotary fluid, and other by- products are to be retained on site to be hauled off and legally disposed of by the contractor. During second stage development, a dispersing agent will be added to the well consisting of 16 pounds of sodium hexametaphosphate, 4 pounds of sodium carbonate, and 1 quart of 5.25% sodium hypochlorate, per 100 gallons of water. All solids pumped out during development are to be retained on site, as above. During disinfection, a granular chlorine compound with 70% free chlorine will be added to the well at a dosage of 2 pounds per 100 feet of water -filled casing and screen. After a period of 24 hours, water in the well will be pumped to waste. f. Groundwater Flow A cone of depression will develop around the well as it is pumped. Groundwater nearby will be drawn toward the well in a radial pattern. The area of influence can be estimated after aquifer tests on the new well have been completed. SOURCES: City of Tustin Public Works Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. g. Groundwater Ouantity A maximum of*roughly 1,500 - 21000 gpm is expected to be withdrawn from the well. SOURCES: City of Tustin Public Works Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 4. Plant Life The site is free from significant plant life. SOURCES: Field Observation MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 5. Animal Li f e The site is free of any significant population of animals, fish, or wildlife. SOURCES: Field Observation MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 6. Noise a. Existing Noise Levels Operation of a drill rig generates roughly 70 dba for 24 hours a day. Drilling must proceed continuously in order to keep the hole open. SOURCES: City of Tustin Public Works Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: The Project Specifications require a noise control program that will limit nighttime noise to 60 dba and prohibit the use of air impact wrenches at night. 7.- Light and Glare Nighttime drilling operations will require lighting to meet CAL/OSHA standards. SOURCES: CAL/OSHA MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: The Project Specifications will require the contractor to shield the lighting so that adjacent property owners are not adversely impacted.' 8. Land Use The proposed project will not result in any substantial alterations to planned land uses for the area. SOURCES: City of Tustin Community Development Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 9. Natural Resources The proposed project will not result in the use of any natural resources or the substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource. SOURCES: City of Tustin Public Works Department Field Observation MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 10. Risk of Upset The proposed project will not involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident of upset conditions. SOURCES: Orange County Fire Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 11. Population As the proposed project does not involve any residential development, it will not result in direct or indirect effects upon population and housing. SOURCES: City of Tustin Community Development Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 12. Housing The proposed project will not result in any direct or indirect effects on housing. SOURCES: City of Tustin Community Development Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 13. Transportation/Circulation Although the proposed project will not generate substantial additional vehicular movement, it will have an effect on existing parking facilities. However, this impact will not be substantial. The Second Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 88-8 requires a minimum of 273 parking spaces to be maintained on the site. According to the approved project plans for the existing development there are currently 285 parking spaces on the site. During construction, there will be a periodic temporary loss of a maximum of 15 spaces. Construction is estimated to last approximately 3 weeks. After construction, there will a permanent loss of three spaces, with a potential periodic temporary loss of an additional four spaces in the permanent maintenance easement. In addition, there will be no substantial impact upon existing transportation systems or alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people or goods. There will be no alterations to waterborne, rail, or air traffic, or an increase in hazards. SOURCE: City of Tustin Public Works Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 14. Public services e. Maintenance The new well will have to be maintained to the same level as other City wells. The Public Works Department/Water Division will be responsible for the maintenance. SOURCES: City of Tustin Public Works Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 15. Energy The proposed project will not result in a significant usage of energy and existing facilities will adequately serve the site. SOURCES: City of Tustin Public Works Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. . 16. Utilities The proposed project will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilities: power or natural gas, communications, water, sewer or septic tanks, storm water drainage, and solid waste and disposal. SOURCES: City of Tustin Public Works Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 17. Human Health The proposed project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard or expose people to any health hazard. SOURCES: City of Tustin Building Division MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 18. Solid Waste Additional solid way may be generated during the construction of the well. Once the proposed project will create no additional waste requiring disposal. SOURCES: City of Tustin Public Works Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: During construction solid waste generated will be removed from the site by the contractor. 19. Aesthetics The proposed project will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, nor will it result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view. SOURCES: City of Tustin Public Works Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 20. Recreation The proposed land acquisition will not result in any impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities. SOURCES: City of Tustin Community Services Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 21. Cultural Resources The proposed project will'not have -any effect on the cultural resources in that the General Plan does not identify any cultural resources on that property on in the immediate vicinity. SOURCES: City of Tustin Community Development Department MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: None Required. 22. Mandatory Findings of significance The proposed project will not result in any significant adverse impacts on the environment. SOURCES: As previously noted. MITIGATION MEASURES/MONITORING REQUIRED: As previously noted. KLB:KATIE2