Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05 AUTHORIZE CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE PARK AVE. IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP 70233)fio AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: JULY 5, 2016 TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER Agenda Item 5 Reviewed: City Manager Finance Director FROM: DOUGLAS S. STACK, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE A CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE PARK AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP 70233) SUMMARY Authorization is requested to enter into a Consultant Services Agreement (CSA) with Michael Baker International for design and environmental services for the Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP 70233). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize staff to enter into a Consultant Services Agreement with Michael Baker International for design and environmental services in an amount not to exceed $280,000 to cover professional services in the amount of $241,920 and a 15% design contingency. FISCAL IMPACT Sufficient funds have been budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2016/17 Capital Improvement Program for the design phase of this project in the amount of $350,000 (Community Facilities District 07-1, Fund 437). CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN The completion of this project contributes to the fulfillment of the City's Strategic Plan Goal B: Public Safety and Protection of Assets and contributes to the fulfillment of the City's Strategic Plan Goal A: Economic and Neighborhood Development, specifically the project implementation of Strategy 1, which among other items, is to continue development of critical phases of Tustin Legacy. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION Staff has initiated a number of requests to Vestar, the developer of the District, to identify and install significant enhancements to the traffic circulation system in The District to address the many concerns voiced by the public since The District was first opened. No improvements have been scheduled to be constructed. A preliminary review has identified the widening of Park Avenue and the addition of one lane along its' southern edge between District Drive and Warner Avenue as a viable solution to relieve congestion along that roadway. The right-of-way for future work currently exists. The project is located on Park Avenue between Tustin Ranch Road and Warner Avenue in the area known as "Tustin Legacy" (see Attachment 1). The proposed improvements within the existing landscape setback area are intended to provide an additional travel lane in the eastbound direction for better flow of traffic between District Drive and Warner Avenue. Intersection treatments are also CSA for Design and Environmental Services for the Park Avenue Improvement Project July 5, 2016 Page 2 proposed just east of Tustin Ranch Road and just west of District Drive. As previously mentioned, no additional right-of-way acquisition is required for the project. Proposals to perform design and environmental services were solicited from four (4) firms and three (3) proposals were received. Following the qualifications based selection process involving three members of the Public Works Department, two members of the Community Development Department, and one member of the Economic Development Department, it was determined that Michael Baker International and their team of sub -consultants are the most qualified to provide the design and environmental services for this project. The negotiated fee for this work has been deemed fair and reasonable. Staff is recommending the City Council authorize staff to enter into a Consultant Services Agreement with Michael Baker International for design and environmental services for this project in the amount of $241,920 and a fifteen percent (15%) design contingency. Stack, P. E. Public Works/City Engineer Attachment 1: Location Map Attachment 2: Sample Consultant Services Agreement S:\City Council Items\2016 Council Items\07-05-2016\Approve CSA for Park Avenue\CSA Park Avenue.docx ■E_TO01LTA 1I►k01 LOCATION MAP Z P LL 0 U ATTACHMENT 2 SAMPLE CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES, is made and entered into this _ day of 20_, by and between the CITY OF TUSTIN, a municipal corporation, hereafter referred to as "City", and ,MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, a Pennsylvania Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". RECITALS WHEREAS, City requires the services of a consultant to furnish the necessary design and environmental services for the Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP 70233) hereinafter referred to as "Project"; and WHEREAS, City has prepared a Request for Proposal (RFP) dated May 10, 2016, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and is by this reference incorporated into this Agreement; and WHEREAS, in response to City's RFP, Consultant has submitted to City a proposal dated June 14, 2016, a copy of which is attached hereto marked as Exhibit "B" and is by this reference incorporated into this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Consultant is qualified to provide the necessary services for the Project and desires to provide said services to City; and WHEREAS, City desires to retain the services of Consultant for said Project. NOW, THEREFORE, for the consideration and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT Section 1: Scope of Consultant's Services Consultant shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to City, the services set forth in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Section 2: Order of Precedence In the event of a conflict between or among any of the documents comprising this Agreement, the following order of precedence shall govern the provision in question: 1. This Agreement 2. City's Request for Proposal (Exhibit "A") 3. Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit "B") Section 3: Time for Completion The time for completion of the work to be performed by Consultant is an essential condition of this Agreement. Consultant shall prosecute regularly and diligently the work of this Agreement according to reasonable schedules established by the City for various items described and as outlined within Consultant's proposal. Consultant shall not be accountable for delays in the progress of its work caused by any condition beyond its control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant. Section 4: Compensation A. The compensation to be paid under this Agreement shall be as set forth in Exhibit "B", which shall not exceed a total cost of $241,920. B. Consultant shall submit detailed invoices, based upon the actual work performed accompanied by backup documentation as requested by the City. C. Progress payments for work completed shall be paid by City as the work progresses, within thirty (30) days of the date of Consultant's invoice. D. Consultant shall provide City with a monthly itemization of all work performed, and the fees accrued thereon, in complete and sufficient detail to fully apprise City thereof. Section 5: Independent Contractor Consultant's relationship to City in the performance of this Agreement is that of an independent contractor. Consultant's personnel performing services under this Agreement shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control and shall be employees of Consultant and not employees of City. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due its employees in connection with this Agreement and shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting them, such as social K security, income tax withholding, unemployment compensation, worker's compensation and similar matters. Section 6: Indemnification Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City, its officers, agents, employees, successors and assigns harmless from any loss, damage, injury, sickness, death, or other claim made by any person and from all costs, expenses and charges including attorney's fees caused by or arising out of Consultant's, its officers', agents', subcontractors', or employees' negligent acts, negligent errors, or negligent omissions or willful misconduct, or conduct for which the law imposes strict liability on Consultant in the performance or failure to perform this Agreement. Section 7: Insurance A. Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement policies of commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance (each of which shall include property damage and bodily injury) and each with limits of at least $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage per occurrence. B. Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement a policy of professional liability insurance coverage with limits of at least $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage per claim or per occurrence. If Consultant provides claims made professional liability insurance, Consultant shall also agree in writing either (1) to purchase tail insurance in the amount required by this Agreement or to cover claims made within five (5) years of the completion of Consultant's service under this Agreement, or (2) to maintain professional liability insurance coverage with the same carrier, or with an equivalent carrier in the amount required by this Agreement for at least five (5) years after completion of Consultant's services under this Agreement. Consultant shall also provide evidence to the City of the purchase of the required tail insurance or continuation of the professional liability policy by executing the attached Letter Agreement on Consultant's letterhead. C. Consultant shall carry and pay for such workers' compensation insurance as is required to fully protect Consultant and its employees under California Worker's Compensation Insurance Law. The insurance company shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City for losses paid under the policy, which losses arose from the work performed by the named insured. D. Other applicable insurance requirements are: (1) Name the City, its officials and employees as additional insured on the commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance policies. (2) The insurance shall be issued by a company authorized by the Insurance Department of the State of California and 3 rated A, VII (seven) or better (if an admitted carrier) or A-, X (ten) or better (if offered by a surplus line broker), by the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, except that the City will accept workers' compensation insurance rated B-, VII (seven) or better, or from the State Compensation fund. (3) The insurance shall not be cancelled, except after thirty (30) days written prior notice to the City; and (4) The commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance shall each be primary as respects the City, and any other insurance maintained by the City shall be in excess of this insurance and not contribute to it. E. Upon execution of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City certificates of insurance and insurer endorsements evidencing the required insurance. Insurer endorsements (or a copy of the policy binder if applicable) shall be provided as evidence of meeting the requirements of Subsections (1)(3) and (4) of Section 7D above and the waiver of subrogation requirement in Section 7C above. If self- insured for worker's compensation, Consultant shall submit to City a copy of its certification of self-insurance issued by the Department of Industrial Relations. Section 8: Termination of Agreement A. City and Consultant shall each have the right to terminate any or all of the services covered by this Agreement at any time or any reason by giving ten (10) business days written advance notice to the other party. B. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall be paid for services rendered by the effective date of the termination. C. Upon termination of this Agreement or completion of the Project, all documents relating to the Project shall become the sole property of City. Should City terminate this Agreement pursuant to subparagraph A. of this Section, Consultant shall within ten (10) business days of receipt of notice of termination, provide City with all documents within Consultant's possession relating to this Agreement and the Project, including but not limited to all completed documents and all drafts of uncompleted documents. Section 9: Notice Any notice allowed or required to be given shall be effective upon personal delivery thereof, or upon depositing thereof in the United States Postal Service, certified mail, upon receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: 4 To City: City of Tustin Attn.: Douglas S. Stack, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780-3715 To Consultant: Michael Baker International, Inc. Attn.: Michael J. Bruz, P.E. 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, CA 92618-2027 Section 10: Miscellaneous Provisions A. Consultant shall proceed immediately and diligently to perform the services provided for in this Agreement upon receipt of notice from City to proceed therewith. B. No part of this Agreement may be assigned by Consultant without the prior written approval of City. C. This Agreement shall extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. D. Consultant shall perform all services required under this Agreement using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar conditions in similar localities, and shall be responsible for all errors and omissions for services performed by Consultant under the terms of this Agreement. E. Consultant certifies that there shall be no discrimination against any employee who is employed in the work covered by this Agreement, or against any application for such employment, because of race, religion, color, sex, or national origin including but not limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment, or recruitment advertising, lay-off or termination, rate of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. F. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with California Law. The parties agree that the Orange County Superior Court is the exclusive venue for any lawsuits by either party regarding this Agreement. 141 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed by the parties on the date and year first above written. "CITY" CITY OF TUSTIN 0 Douglas S. Stack, P.E. Title Director of Public Works/City Engineer "CONSULTANT" MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. Michael J. Bruz, P.E. Title Vice President Transportation/Public Works C:1 EXHIBIT "A" CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TUST"IN BUILDING OUR FUTURE HONORING OUR PAST CITY OF TUSTIN 300 Centennial Way Tustin, California 92780 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS for Professional Consulting Services for the Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIF 70233) May 2016 PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS: Responses to the Request for Proposal (RFP) are to be submitted to: Ken Nishikawa Deputy Director of Public Works - Engineering Public Works Department City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California 92780 no later than 4:00 PM on June 14, 2016. Six (6) copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a sealed envelope and marked: "Proposal for Park Avenue Improvements". Proposals received after the specified time will not be accepted and will be returned unopened. Fees shall be provided in a separate sealed envelope. Questions regarding this request will be limited to written form and shall be submitted no later than May 26, 2016. Verbal inquiries will not be accepted. Questions shall be directed to Ken Nishikawa. INDEX 1. Project Description 2 11. Tentative Schedule of Events 2 III. Scope of Work 3 IV, Proposal Requirements 5 V. General Requirements 8 V1. Consultant Evaluation & Selection Process 10 vii. Administration Specifications 10 ATTACHMENTS CITY OF TuSTIN Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP 70233) - RFP May 2016 Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is located on Park Avenue between Tustin Ranch Road and Warner Avenue in the area known as "Tustin Legacy." The proposed improvements within the existing landscape setback area are intended to provide an additional travel lane in the eastbound direction for better flow of traffic between District Drive and Warner Avenue. Intersection treatments are also proposed just east of Tustin Ranch Road and just west of District Drive. No additional right- of-way acquisition is required for the project. Improvements on Park Avenue include but not limited to the following: • Widening the existing southerly curb of the roadway and modifying the landscape setback including the removal of trees to provide the additional eastbound travel lane between District Drive and Warner Avenue • An 8 -foot to 14 -foot wide landscaped median shall be included or retained • Installation of the necessary electrical circuits to provide power for relocated street lights, street furniture, and lighting • Modifying the existing traffic signal located at the intersection of Park Avenue and District Drive (private street), if necessary • Modifying the existing traffic signal and lane geometry located at the Park Avenue intersection with Tustin Ranch Road by providing dual westbound left -turn lanes • Modifying the existing traffic signal and lane geometry located at the Park Avenue intersection with Warner Avenue, if necessary Attachment 1 to this RFP includes graphic exhibits of conceptual street plans and other design elements including the existing right-of-way and the landscape setback limits. Ill. TENTATIVE SCHEDULE OF EVENTS 05/10/16 Issuance of Request for Proposals 05/26/16 Deadline for written questions 06/14/16 Proposals due at Tustin City Hall by 4:00 PM 06/15/16 -07/06/16 Selection process 07/19/16 City Council approval of consultant contract 07/25/16 Issuance of notice -to -proceed (est. date) CITY OF TuSTIN Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP 70233) - RFP May 2016 Page 3 Ill. SCOPE OF WORK The proposed Scope of Work, at a minimum, should include and address each of the tasks which follow in sufficient detail to fully understand the proposed products and deliverables, timelines for delivering progress plans, coordination meetings, and relationship of the Consultant -In -Charge to others on the Consultant's team. Although the City is attempting to identify the limits and services required, this should not unnecessarily limit the consultant in the development of a scope it believes is necessary to meet the City's goals and objectives: 1. DESIGN SURVEY AND BASE MAPPING A detailed topographic survey and map, plotted at a scale of 1" = 20' supplemented with field inventories and verification shall be prepared and used by the Consultant in the preparation of the improvement plans. All existing surface features must be depicted clearly on these plans. A thorough investigation of existing underground utilities shall be performed, including research of record drawings on file at the City and all applicable utility companies and field reconnaissance, including pot -holing as necessary. All existing utilities shall be accurately depicted both horizontally and vertically on the improvement plans and profiles. This survey work shall also include the filing of corner records for the tie -out of existing monuments with the Orange County Surveyor prior to and after construction. 2. GEOTECHNICAL A complete geotechnical investigation shall be performed to evaluate the surface and subsurface conditions along the project alignment. The report shall include, but not be limited to the following: existing pavement conditions with in-place strength test results, field core samplings with laboratory data and R -values, recommendations for pavement design, recommendations for type and strength of concrete to be used for structures, any special trenching requirements, and any other recommendations for the construction of the project. 3. IMPROVEMENT PLANS Complete street improvement plans and profiles, landscape/irrigation plans, traffic signing and striping plans, electrical plans, and precise grading plan (landscaped area modifications) shall be prepared in ink on standard 24" x 36" mylar (4 mill at a scale of 1" = 20'. The plans shall include, but not be limited to the following: CITY OF TuSTIN Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP 70233) - RFP May 2016 Page 4 identification of topographic features, existing underground utilities, curb and gutter, sidewalks, asphalt concrete pavement, street lights and conduit, traffic signing and striping, traffic signals, conduits and detector loops, traffic control, and all proposed improvements clearly identified and dimensioned. The plans shall also include full construction details, as required, including, but not limited to, details and specifications for storm water treatment BMP's, and light poles/fixtures. The Consultant is responsible for evaluating access ramps and driveway approaches for compliance with the latest federal standards and, where applicable, access ramps and driveway approaches shall be redesigned to meet the current federal standards. 4. SPECIFICATIONS The City of Tustin has adopted the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ("Green Book" latest edition) for highway construction, and the State of California Standard Specifications and Plans (latest edition) for traffic signal, signing and striping construction. The Consultant shall prepare detailed project technical specifications for bidding and construction purposes in accordance with the standard City format and with the City's standard boiler -plate detailed specifications where applicable. The Consultant is responsible for Detailed Technical Specifications and the Bid Items Listing (to be included in Section C). The City will prepare Sections A through D, excluding the Bid Items Listing, and Section E, Part 1. 5. ESTIMATES The Consultant shall calculate quantities and prepare preliminary and final itemized cost estimates for the various bid items. The City requires unit breakdown of construction items. Lump sum items will require City approval, and requires sufficient back-up information to justify the estimated cost. The final estimate is to be submitted with the final construction plans and specifications. 6. UTILITY COORDINATION The Consultant shall provide full coordination with all affected utilities. This includes, but is not limited to, distributing an initial notice with map of project area requesting facility locations and a second notice with preliminary plans at the approximate 90% completion stage. A utility log shall be maintained to track all correspondence, responses, requests, and potential conflicts. It is the Consultant's responsibility to ensure that a written response is received from all utility companies. Follow-up CITY OF TuSTIN Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP 70233) - RFP May 2016 Page 5 correspondence will be required with utilities that need to be relocated or adjusted prior to or during construction. 7. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (WQMP) The Consultant shall prepare a project specific Priority Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), utilizing the Santa Ana Region Model WQMP, the Technical Guidance Document, and the Public Agency WQMP Template. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The Consultant shall research and provide the determination as to whether or not this project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA or if a Negative Declaration (ND) is required. Consultant shall include fees in the proposal for each type of document that may be required. If a ND is required, Consultant shall prepare the Environmental Initial Study and environmental review of the preliminary plans and report. This work shall include preparation of complete environmental documentation in accordance with CITY's procedures and pursuant to CEQA requirements. It must address all relevant environmental impact issues that have been specified in the Initial Study. Coordinate with City staff as necessary. IV. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Although the City requires no specific format, this section is intended to provide guidelines to the consultant regarding features that the City will look for and expect to be included in the proposal. 1. CONTENT & FORMAT The City requests that proposals submitted be organized and presented in a neat and logical format and are relevant to these services. Consultant's proposals shall be clear, accurate, and comprehensive. Excessive or irrelevant material will not be favorably received. Proposals shall contain no more than ten (10) typed pages using a 10 point minimum font size, including transmittal/offer letter and resumes of key people, but excluding Index/Table of Contents, tables, charts, and graphic exhibits. The purpose of these restrictions is to minimize the costs of proposal preparation and to ensure that the response to the RFP is fully relevant to the project. CITY OF TUSTIN Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP 70233) - RFP May 2016 Page 6 The proposal should include the following: • Transmittal/offer letter • Page numbering • Index/Table of Contents • Approach • Team Organization including an organization diagram and time commitment of key staff • Statement of Qualifications including descriptions of similar projects by key staff to be assigned during the term of the contract • Brief resumes of key staff • Schedule of Hourly Rates and fees in a separate sealed envelope 2. APPROACH A description of the firm's approach and work program to meet the city's objectives shall be included. It should explain the technical approach, methodology, and specific tasks and activities that will be performed to address the specific issues and work items. 3. TEAM ORGANIZATION The purpose of this section is to describe the organization of the project team including subconsultants and key staff. A project manager and an alternaterp oject manager shall be named who shall be the prime contact and be responsible for coordinating all activities with the City. An organization diagram shall be submitted showing all key team members and illustrating the relationship between the City, the project manager, key staff, and subconsultants. There also should be a brief description of the role and responsibilities of all key staff and subconsultants identified in the team organization. 4. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS The information provided in this section should describe the qualifications of the firm and key staff in performing projects within the past five years that are similar in scope and size to demonstrate competence to perform these services. The projects listed should be those that the key staff members named for this project were responsible for performing. Information shall include: • Names of key staff that participated on named projects and their specific responsibilities • The client's name, contact person, addresses, and telephone numbers • A brief description of type and extent of services provided CITY OF TuSTIN Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP 70233) - RFP May 2016 Page 7 • Completion dates (estimated, if not yet completed) • Total costs of the projects There should be included in the section brief resumes of key personnel who will provide these services demonstrating their qualifications and experience. Resumes should highlight education, relevant experience, licenses, and specific responsibilities for services described. 5. FEE PROPOSAL Compensation for services provided shall be based upon the consultant's detailed fee proposal to furnish the services detailed in their proposal. A Fee Proposal shall be submitted in a separate, sealed envelope and marked as "Fee Proposal" along with the name of the project. A work program together with a breakdown of labor hours by employee billing classification together with the cost of non -labor and subconsultant services shall be included with the fee proposal. The labor breakdown shall be compiled based upon a listing of work tasks that correlates with the consultant's defined scope of work for the project proposal. This information will be used by the City staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the fee proposal and may be used in negotiating the final fee amounts for the contract agreement. The fee proposal of the three top ranked consultants will be opened at the conclusion of the consultant evaluation and selection process. Fees will not be used to determine the ranking of the consultants. The Fee Proposals of those consultants not ranked in the top three will be returned to them unopened upon award of contract to the selected consultant. The City will negotiate the final fee with the top ranked consultant. Reimbursable expenses shall not be allowed unless negotiated prior to a contract. Price escalations during the contract term are disfavored and will not be allowed unless negotiated prior to execution of contract. Although no public meetings are anticipated, the fee proposal shall include a unit cost for a public meeting (e.g., $/public meeting) in the event a meeting or meetings will be required. The consultant shall prepare progress billings, reflective of the project schedule and the scope of work completed, by line item and description. 6. V. CITY OF TUSTIN Pari( Avenue Improvement Project (CIP 70233) - RFP May 201 b Page 8 STATEMENT OF OFFER & SIGNATURE The Proposal shall contain a statement that the proposals are a firm offer for a 90 - day period and signed by an individual authorized to act on behalf of the firm. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS I.E�ir17_1.[4141j[*ILII 743I4.ii�� The consultant shall furnish with the proposal proof of the following minimum insurance coverage. These minimum levels of coverage are required to be maintained for the duration of the project: A. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverage - $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. B. Professional Liability Coverage - $1,000,000 per occurrence (note: A "claims made" policy is acceptable). If consultant provides "claims made" coverage, consultant shall also agree in writing to either: i. Purchase Tail Insurance in the amount required by the resulting agreement to cover claims made within five years of completion of consultant's services under the agreement. ii. Maintain professional liability insurance coverage with the same carrier, or with an equivalent carrier in the amount required by the resulting agreement five years after completion of consultant's services under this agreement. The consultant shall provide written evidence of either form by executing the attached letter agreement (Attachment 3) on consultant letterhead. C. Worker's Compensation Coverage - State statutory limits. Deductibles, Self -Insurance Retentions, or Similar Forms of Coverage Limitations or Modifications, must be declared to and approved by the City of Tustin. The consultant is encouraged to contact its insurance carriers during the proposal stage to ensure that the insurance requirements can be met if selected for negotiation of a contract agreement. The City shall be named as Additional Insured and no policy may be modified or cancelled prior to thirty (30) days written notice. Certificates of insurance and insurer endorsements evidencing the required insurance shall be provided. CITY of TuSTIN Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP 70233) - RFP May 2016 Page 9 2. STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT The consultant will enter into an agreement with the City based upon the contents of the RFP and the consultant's proposal. The City's standard form of agreement is included as Attachment 2. The consultant shall carefully review the agreement, and include with the proposal a description of any exceptions requested to the standard contract. If there are no exceptions, a statement to that effect shall be included in the proposal. 3. DISCLAIMER This RFP does not commit the City to award a contract, or to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of the proposal. The City reserves the right to extend the due date for the proposal, to accept or reject any or all proposals received as a result of this request, to negotiate with any qualified consultant, or to cancel this RFP in part or in its entirety. The City may require the selected consultant to participate in negotiations and to submit such technical, fee, or other revisions of their proposals as may result from negotiations. 4. ASSIGNED REPRESENTATIVES The City will assign a responsible representative to administer the contract, and to assist the consultant in obtaining information. The consultant also shall assign a responsible representative (project manager) and an alternate, who shall be identified in the proposal. The consultant's representative will remain in responsible charge of the consultant's duties from the notice -to -proceed through project completion. If the consultant's primary representative should be unable to continue with the project, then the alternate representative identified in the proposal shall become the project manager. The City's representative shall first approve any substitution of representatives or subconsultants identified in the proposal in writing. The City reserves the right to review and approve/disapprove all key staff and subconsultant substitution or removal, and may consider such changes not approved to be a breach of contract. 5. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE A city business license will be required of the consultant and any subconsultants for services under this agreement. CITY OF TuSTIN Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP 70233) - RFP May 2016 Page 10 VII. CONSULTANT EVALUATION &SELECTION PROCESS The City's consultant evaluation and selection process is based upon Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) for professional services. The following criteria will be used in evaluating the proposals using a point value system (100 points) based upon the weighting indicated below: 1. Approach and work plan to achieve specified City objectives. (40 points) 2. Qualifications and experience of the project manager and other key individuals. (40 points) 3. Clarity of proposal. (10 points) 4. Compliance with proposal requirements including the ten (10) page limitation. (10 points) Reference checks will only be conducted for a short list of firms or the top rated firm. The City may elect to interview a short list of qualified firms or to interview only the top rated firm based upon the proposals submitted for the project. The City staff will negotiate a contract with the best qualified firm for the desired consulting services. Should the City staff be unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the firm considered to be the most qualified, negotiations with that firm shall be formally terminated. Negotiations will then be undertaken with the next most qualified firm. Failing accord with the second most qualified firm, the City staff will terminate negotiations and continue the negotiation process with the next most qualified firms in order of their evaluation ranking until an agreement is reached and a firm is selected and an agreement is executed. Additional information related to the consultant selection process will be made available in the future once the City has executed this contract. Please refrain from making any verbal inquires or requests for a formal debriefing related to the subject RFP until the City of Tustin completes the ongoing contract process. VII. ADMINISTRATION SPECIFICATIONS 1. THE CITY OF TUSTIN'S RIGHTS TO PROPOSALS All proposals, upon submission to the City of Tustin shall become its property for use as deemed appropriate. By submitting a proposal, the offer covenants not to make any claim for or have any right to damages because of any misinterpretation or misunderstanding of the specification, or because of any misinformation or lack of information. The City of Tustin has the following prerogatives with regard to proposals submitted: - to accept or reject any or all proposals; - to correct any arithmetic errors in any or all proposals submitted; CITY OF TUSTIN Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP 70233) - RFP May 2016 Page 11 - to utilize any or all the ideas from proposals submitted; - to change the proposal's due date upon appropriate notification; - to adopt any or all of an offeror's proposal: and - to negotiate modifications to the scope and fee with selected offeror prior to contract award. ATTACHMENTS Attachment I --- Graphic Exhibits Attachment 2 --- Sample Consultant Services Agreement Attachment 3 --- Letter Agreement �■1ffil, T4kIit GRAPHIC EXHIBITS 9LOZ-bZ-LL 69:LZ:1L dOl 6Mp•go-dw! ggLg\sluawanojdwi poi 07 f� M, 1ROAN, l ii o 0 43)c p N ` c 71f 7 1 may^ `o SII ~ d W F z Wf� a C'1 z a zE- :4 Z dZ xx E- 4 d� f1. F zw o r� CO q F z zo W U 9M 04 d Ix .� o Q � z za oE� U �A 0 C4 0 a 0 U 5.K-rz-i � 1�[e �I Al n roRviv\ a a buM p.a \ ea - rn-.L-v\�4 duMr w mover\•wue.v\9Lwot\� �11{i r . kit z_ S �1g .e•Ii� Q o�98 0 NH Q,Q �s G 11 o �q z � X, `�\ �� fit';' 'a•, c. � Q,' �' � � is � � .Q E a E B a a �'l ' l4 3 Y 1 i t i12�I E f✓ e tl t .Ll .Ll .61 t h �, I ,:• n ��� � � � y"GC e V 1 I E� o t •L1 t $ V�4W j11' \ _ SNOIK"H [T4 't' t Z � ,, � ' g .. - ..+r�•'.� - '- i ._ -� urar noume>aa ura an y�yf- rlr 14, 4. i Y 2�i YIk �f� I y 1 y 7i i ti 1 i♦i{ I � I � '�'� qo w t rf dVl7 H� 8 S ��S 7,`•,492 L 1 v a�B�f 3•t ATTACHMENT 3 LETTER AGREEMENT TO BE REPRODUCED (PRINTED) ON CONSULTANT'S LETTERHEAD Date: City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Attention: Ken Nishikawa, Deputy Director of Public Works - Engineering Subject: Dear Mr. Nishikawa: has executed the Consultant Services Agreement for the above referenced project. In lieu of providing occurrence based professional liability insurance coverage as required by the Agreement, warrants and represents that it shall maintain claims made professional liability insurance coverage with the insurance company listed on the attachment, or with an equivalent carrier, in the amounts indicated for at least five (5) years after the completion of the consulting services under the Agreement. will provide the City with certificates of insurance coverage within the period established above in order to evidence compliance with this Agreement. Sincerely, CONSULTANT NAME Authorized Signature ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO: Douglas S. Stack, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer "F-2:11=103TV4 MAIM Eel0' David Kendig City Attorney S:\CIP Projects - Active\40087 - Main Street Innprovennents\Design\CSA - Tail Insurance - Long.doc EXHIBIT "B" CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL now, 4i Slirll 1 N T k R N A t 0 N A L 4* 0 30 '31 RK E' I mM 'P ROVE ��YENU "NT t -ECT P ROJ, fC�IP No. 70233) i" now, 4i Slirll 1 N T k R N A t 0 N A L Cour Mission Michael Baker June 14, 2016 Mr. Ken Nishikawa, PE — Deputy Director of Public Works, Engineering Public Works Department CITY OF TUSTIN 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 JN:153928 Subject: PROPOSAL I Consulting Engineering Services for the Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP No. 70233) Michael Baker International, Inc. (Michael Baker) is pleased to submit the enclosed proposal for the Park Avenue Improvement Project for the City of Tustin (City). This important project will help alleviate traffic congestion along the Park Avenue corridor by promoting through traffic movement to avoid delays caused by excessive traffic queues within the corridor. We understand the City's need to improve traffic mobility and operational safety for the continued prosperity for the community, therefore, Michael Baker has assembled a group of technical experts to accomplish the City's goals. To provide the City with exceptional engineering services, Michael Baker has selected Brian Anderson, PE to serve as Project Manager and Fabio Escobar, PE to serve as Alternate Project Manager, as has been requested for this project. These managers have been specifically selected based on their extensive experience working at Tustin Legacy and the City of Tustin; as well as for their respective expertise. Mr. Anderson is a Transportation Manager with over 30 years of roadway and transportation system design; and Mr. Escobar is a Land Development Manager with over 33 years of commercial and infrastructure design experience. Our goal is to utilize our team members' knowledge, combined with the knowledge and skills of our extensive in-house staff to deliver a complete and successful project. Our expert in-house team is comprised of over 250 staff members including innovative urban designers, landscape architects, traffic, and drainage engineers who have demonstrated the ability to deliver projects on schedule and in budget. Michael Baker has partnered with specialty design firms including: Ninyo & Moore, Dudek and Associates, and C -Below to provide geotechnical and pavement design, arborist expertise, and utility locating services, respectively, for the City. The Michael Baker Team is confident you will find us exceptionally qualified to successfully implement this project. Working in collaboration with your leadership team, we will deliver excellence and creative problem solving embedded within timely, fiscally responsible solutions. This proposal is a firm offer for period of 90 days. Michael Baker has carefully reviewed the agreement provided in the RFP and takes no exceptions. Michael Bruz, PE, our team's Project Principal, is authorized to act on behalf of Michael Baker. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact either of us directly. Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. Michieu, ruz, PE Vice President Transportation/ Public Works 949/855-3640 1 Michael.bruz@mbakerintl.com Brian Anderson, PE Project Manager 949/330-4145 1 briananderson@mbakerintl.com 14725 Alton Parkway I Irvine, CA 92618-2027 MBAKERINTL.COM Off ice: 949/472-35051 Fax: 949/472-8373 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Letter Table of Contents APPROACH...............................................................................................2 Understanding................................................................................... 2 Approach...........................................................................................2 Methodology/Work Program............................................................2 Anticipated Challenges......................................................................7 Graphic: Project Schedule TEAM ORGANIZATION................................................................. Graphic: Organization Chart STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS............................................................8 Project Experience............................................................................9 Resumes of Key Personnel..............................................................10 Fee Proposal — Included in separately sealed envelope I Table of Contents INTERNATIONAL x Understanding The project as described within the Request for Proposal (RFP) consists of the widening of Park Avenue and associated intersection improvements between Tustin Ranch Road and Warner Avenue in the area known as "Tustin Legacy". The proposed improvements include adding an additional eastbound lane between District Drive and Warner Avenue; median modifications to accommodate a second westbound through lane at the west leg of the District Drive Intersection; adding a shared left -turn and through lane at the intersection of Tustin Ranch Road; and associated traffic signal modifications at the intersections of Tustin Ranch Road, Warner, and District Drive. The proposed improvements will require significant landscape modifications including removal/ relocation of multiple trees, and the adjacent sidewalk. Existing utilities, drainage, and street lighting facilities will be relocated to accommodate the new eastbound travel lane. The proposed widening is to occur within the existing landscape easement, however, based on our preliminary review of the site improvements, modifications to the existing property right- of-way may be necessary to accommodate the proposed relocated driveway entrances. Approach Our plan of approach is to develop the Park Avenue Improvement Project (CIP No. 70233) to be consistent with the planned traffic operational improvements based on Linscot, Law and Greenspan recommendations as addressed within the current Request for Proposal. At the start of the project, Michael Baker will meet with the City to clarify the proposed goals are consistent with the City's commitments. The Michael Baker Team has a clear understanding of the Tustin Legacy development, being that Michael Baker has provided a significant contribution to design and development of Tustin Legacy since the initial base reallocation process. Therefore, the Michael Baker Team has utilized our extensive catalog of project data, in the development of the following work plan to address the requested design services, with anticipated optional professional services, to make this a successful project. Methodology/ Werk Program Our understanding of the project is based on information obtained from the RFP, discussions with the City, and review of our extensive reference library of Tustin Legacy. The following scope of work provides a complete work plan specific to the RFP and Michael Baker's understanding to successfully complete this project. Only work tasks identified below are included in our fee proposal. Phase 1.0 Preliminary Design Development Task 1.0; Project kickoff Meeting 1.1 Kick-off Meeting. Michael Baker will prepare and attend a kick-off meeting to set, select and review project goals and expectations. Distribute meeting notes to document/track decisions and responsibilities. Deliverables: Kick -Off Meeting/ Notes Task 2: Review Existing Site Conditions and Utility Coordination 2.1 Field Review Photo Log. Michael Baker will perform a site visit to assess the street and site conditions. A photo - document log of the site will be collected. Site review will focus on needed design aspects, ADA compliance, signing and striping, drainage, land contour, and utility appurtenances. 2.2 Utility Notification Letters. Michael Baker will prepare a series of three (3) utility notification letters (under City letterhead) for the project, and will be distributed to utility agencies. Responses from the agencies will logged and base map utilities will be incorporated in AutoCAD format as background project data. Five (5) utility coordination meetings will be provided, including general coordination with owners via email and/or telephone. 2.3 Utility Potholing (Budgetary). Michael Baker will provide field utility exploration services to supplement the record data. For budgetary purposes, two (2) days of field pot -hole investigation, approximately eight (8) potholes, are included under this task in addition to traffic control, as necessary. 2.4 Collect City Reference Documents. Michael Baker will research and obtain available data, including record data supplied by the City, and other agency documents (utility, developers, etc.) to supplement our field investigation. Deliverables: Utility Notification Letters (3); Summary Table; Utility Base Mapping; Pothole Investigation two (2) field days. Task 3: Design Survey and Base Mapping 3.1 Project Control. Horizontal and vertical control will be established at the site sufficient to support final design. Unless otherwise directed by the City, the basis of horizontal control will be California Coordinate System of 1983 (CCS 83), Zone 6, Epoch 2007.00. Coordinates will be expressed as grid values in terms of the U.S. survey foot. Coordinates will be based on the published values from the Orange County Surveyor. Vertical control will be provided in terms of the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88), based locally upon County bench marks. 3.2 Topographic Survey. Topographic mapping will be provided for design -level detail at a scale of 1"= 20' with one (1) foot contour intervals. Mapping will meet the requirements in "ASPRS Accuracy Standards for Large Scale Maps", dated March 31, 1993, and will be provided in AutoCAD format including a digital terrain model (DTM). Design files prepared in AutoCAD Civil 3D 2013 format unless specified by client. Spot elevation will be collected in Proposal I Paget I N T E R N AT I O N Aa PAAK AWNVE 1 iii` ' (crl rte. ca sufficient manner to provide design from right-of-way to right-of-way. 3.3 Topographic Base Map. Prepare a topographic file of the survey points to show the existing elevations and features of the project. Prepare the plan at a 1"=20' scale. 3.4 Monument Preservation. In accordance with Section 8771 of the California Business and Professions Code, Michael Baker will recover existing Land Survey controlling monuments where proposed improvements are likely to cause their destruction and establish local ties prior to construction. Local ties will be memorialized on Corner Records and/or a Record of Survey as appropriate and filed with the County of Orange. This task includes rehabilitation of monuments, as part of the post -construction activities. Corner Records and/or a Record of Survey will be filed with the County of Orange to update rehabilitated monument records. A total of two (2) controlling Land Survey monuments are estimated for this task. Deliverables: Project Control; Topographic Survey; Monument Preservation Task 4: Geotechnical Investigation 4.1 Review of Readily Available Background Materials. Review includes: published geologic and seismic hazards maps, groundwater data, stereoscopic aerial photographs, and reports and/or plans provided by the City. 4.2 Field Coordination. Project coordination and planning, including preparation of traffic control plans, encroachment permit acquisition, and coordination and scheduling for subsurface exploration. We assume fees for encroachment permits will be waived by the City. Geological site reconnaissance to select and mark the proposed boring locations and to coordinate with underground Service Alert (USA) for utility verification. 4.3 Field Sampling. Drilling, sampling, and logging of four (4) small -diameter borings to depths up to approximately 20 -feet below adjacent grades. The purpose of the borings will be to observe the existing structural pavement sections and subgrade soil conditions and to collect soil samples for laboratory testing. The boring holes will be backfilled with on- site soils and sand and capped with dyed concrete. 4.4 Laboratory Testing. Geotechnical laboratory testing of representative soils samples to evaluate in-situ moisture and density, gradation, sand equivalency, corrosivity, and R -value characteristics of the on-site soils. Data compilation and geotechnical analysis of field and laboratory data. 4.5 Investigation and Testing Report. Preparation of a written report presenting the results of our field exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering analyses, as well as our conclusions and recommendations relative to the geotechnical aspects of project design and construction. The report will include existing boring logs, existing pavement conditions, laboratory test results, and recommendations for design and construction, including pavement design, concrete, and trenching. Deliverables: Field Exploration; Investigation Report; Pavement Design Task S: Environmental Documentation Environmental Documentation. As requested in the RFP, Michael Baker has provided optional services to address the determination of the appropriate environmental documentation. Michael Baker will meet with the City Staff to review requirements of both a IS/MND and CE. Based on the outcome of this meeting, Michael Baker will prepare the appropriate documentation to carry the project forward: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) (Optional Service) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The following services shall be provided: 5.1 Technical Studies. Michael Baker will prepare the following technical studies: Hazardous Materials, Cultural Resources, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases, and Noise: 5.1a Hazardous Materials. Michael Baker will document the existing hazards and hazardous materials conditions at the project site based on available public records. Past site usage will be investigated, where necessary, through a review of commercial database summaries, provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), regarding public agency records. Regulatory sites within and surrounding the project site will be mapped within a one (1) mile radius. The existing regulatory conditions per the State Cortese Database Listing will be verified. Potential hazardous materials conditions within the project site will be considered based on the sources described above. Michael Baker will utilize the above referenced research to analyze potential project -related impacts, as they pertain to hazards and hazardous materials per the CEQA thresholds of significance. An analysis of the proposed construction activities and operations of the project will be conducted. The handling of hazardous materials in soils and/or groundwater during construction will be considered. Should a potentially significant impact arise, Michael Baker will recommend mitigation measures to reduce these impacts to the extent feasible. This task assumes that no right-of-way acquisition would be required as part of the project. 5.1b Cultural Resources. Our cultural resources subconsultant will prepare a Cultural Resources Assessment for the project. The Assessment will address archaeological, historical, and paleontological resources under CEQA and will consist of the following primary components: Determination of impact area for basis of analysis Native American consultation, including assistance to the City with AB52 compliance Literature/records searches for known resources, including: Proposal I Page 3 INTERN A T! 4 N AL o Archaeological and historic records to be searched at South Central Coastal Information Center o Paleontological records to be searched at Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County o Review of historic aerials and topographic maps; and o Review of previous studies in the area Perform research to develop brief contexts for paleontological, prehistoric and historic resources Preparation of a report reflecting results and findings The results of the Cultural Resources Assessment will be summarized within the IS/MND. A description of existing conditions, potential impacts, and mitigation measures (if applicable) will be provided. 5.1c Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases. Fugitive dust and equipment exhaust emissions from construction activities will be quantitatively evaluated using CalEEMod. As the project is a roadway widening project and would not generate operational trips, the operational emissions analysis will be qualitative. Where necessary, carbon monoxide hotspots will be evaluated. Michael Baker will also qualitatively discuss naturally occurring asbestos impacts. Michael Baker will also prepare an inventory of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (i.e., nitrous oxide, methane, and carbon dioxide) from both direct and indirect sources. The results of the air quality and GHG analysis will be summarized within the IS/MND. A description of existing conditions, potential impacts, and mitigation measures (if applicable) will be provided. 5.1d Noise. Michael Baker will review applicable noise and land use compatibility criteria for the project area. Noise standards regulating noise impacts will be discussed for land uses adjacent to the proposed roadway widening. The construction noise impacts will be evaluated in terms of maximum levels (Lmax) and hourly equivalent continuous noise levels (Leq) and the frequency of occurrence. A screening level operational noise assessment will be conducted to determine the change in ambient noise due to implementation of the proposed roadway widening. Compliance with applicable noise standards will be evaluated, with recommended mitigation measures included where appropriate. This scope excludes on-site noise measurements. The results of the noise analysis will be summarized within the IS/MND. A description of existing conditions, potential impacts, and mitigation measures (if applicable) will be provided. 5.2 Research and Investigation. Michael Baker will initiate the CEQA process by attaining and evaluating necessary information with respect to the proposed project. Project research will include coordination with the City to acquire relevant environmental data, previous studies for the area and other available files, exhibits, maps, and reference documents. The investigation will include a site visit to review existing land uses and environmental conditions, as well as a photographic inventory of on-site and surrounding uses. Based upon the detailed information obtained during project initiation, Michael Baker will draft a preliminary project description for incorporation into the Initial Study. 5.3 Preparation of the Initial Study. Michael Baker will prepare an Initial Study in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines. The Initial Study will include detailed explanations of all checklist determinations and discussions of potential environmental impacts. The analysis shall be in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21080 (c) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15070. The Initial Study will be presented as follows: 5.3a Introduction. This section will cite the environmental review requirements of the project, pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines. The Introduction will include the project location, environmental setting, existing uses on- and off-site, the Project Description (confirmed by City staff in Task 5.2, Research and Investigation), project phasing, and relevant background/history information. 5.3b Environmental Checklist. This section will include a summary page of project information followed by an explanation of factors considered for potential impacts. The Initial Study Checklist will be presented in a four (4) column layout, identifying: (1) potentially significant impacts, (2) potentially significant impacts unless mitigated, (3) less than significant impacts, and (4) issues resulting in no impacts. 5.3c Environmental Analysis. The Environmental Analysis sections will provide vital supporting information for the conclusions rendered for the Environmental Checklist. In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, this section include a detailed review of the following issues: • Aesthetics, Light, and Land Use and Relevant Glare Planning • Agricultural and • Mineral Resources Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Noise • Biological Resources • Population • Cultural Resources Public Services • Geology and Soils • Recreation • Greenhouse Gases • Traffic and Circulation Hazards and Hazardous • Utilities Materials • Hydrology and Water • Mandatory Findings of Quality Significance Each topical impact area will be analyzed in detail based upon existing information or technical analyses described above. The existing environmental setting related to each impact topic will be provided, and a summary of the project's potential impacts will be discussed. Where necessary, project design features or mitigation measures will be provided to minimize impacts to a level below significance. 5.3d Initial Study Determination. The determination page will conclude the appropriate action based upon the Initial Study evaluation. Proposal I Page4 I N T E H N A T 1 0 N A L l fi TNORM SF"CIFS` PARK AVENU MPROVEM t4 ` PROj A:T`' (CIP to. 70223) 5.3e Graphic Exhibits. The environmental document will include a maximum of five (5) exhibits to enhance the written text and clarify the project and potential environmental impacts. 5.3f Administrative Draft Initial Study. Michael Baker will submit five (5) copies of the Administrative Draft Initial Study for review and comment by the City. Should additional copies be required, additional copies will be provided by Michael Baker at an additional fee. This scope of work assumes two rounds of review by City staff prior to the 30 -day CEQA public review process. Correspondingly, this scope is limited to two rounds of revisions by Michael Baker in response to City comments. 5.4 Preparation of the Public Review IS/MND. With the anticipated conclusion in the Initial Study that no significant environmental effects will occur, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) will be prepared. Following this determination, Michael Baker will prepare the Notice of Intent to Adopt (N01) and the MND for City review. The N0[ and MND will be attached to the Initial Study to fully explain the proposed project and its effects. Twenty-five (25) copies, one (1) camera-ready original, and an electronic file of the IS/MND will be provided to the City. Michael Baker will submit the IS/MND to the State Clearinghouse and additional agencies/interested parties as directed by the City. This task assumes that the City would be responsible for any radius mailing or newspaper noticing required for public review. The IS/MND would be subject to a mandatory 30 -day public review period. 5.5 Preparation of the Final IS/MND. Michael Baker will prepare a draft Final IS/MND for City review and approval. Michael Baker will respond to City comments on the draft final document. The final document will include a purpose subsection, reference the review process, comments letters received, responses to comments, and any required edits/updates to the Public Review document. Also included within this task is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 (AB 3180). Fifteen copies (15), one (1) camera-ready original, and an electronic file of the Final IS/MND will be provided to the City. Michael Baker will provide the document to each agency/interested party who submitted a comment letter during the 30 -day public review period. Due to the unpredictable nature of potential comment letters received during the public review period, this task is limited to a maximum of twelve (12) hours for Responses to Comments. Additional effort necessary for the Responses to Comments process (due to a high volume of comment letters, complex issues raised in comment letters, etc.) would be performed on a time and materials basis. Upon adoption of the IS/MND by the City, Michael Baker will prepare a Notice of Determination (NOD) and will file the notices at the Orange County Clerk's Office. This scope of work excludes any applicable CECIA filing fees required by the CDFW. 5.6 Coordination and Meetings. Our Environmental lead will undertake consultation and coordination of the project and the environmental review for compliance with CEQA requirements. The Environmental lead will attend up to two (2) staff -level meetings and one (1) public hearing for the project. Michael Baker will represent the project team at staff meetings and the public hearing and make a presentation as necessary. • Two staff -level IS/MND kick-off or progress meetings • One public hearing with a presentation as necessary IS/MND Deliverables: As described above, Michael Baker will provide the City with the following deliverables: ® Five (5) copies of the Phase I Site Assessment • Five (5) copies of the Cultural Resources Assessment • Five (5) copies of the Air Quality/GHG Technical Data Five (5) copies of the Noise Technical Data Five (5) copies of the Administrative Draft Initial Study Twenty-five (25) copies, one (1) camera-ready copy, and one (1) electronic file of the Public Review IS/MND Fifteen (15) copies, one (1) camera-ready copy, and one (1) electronic file of the Final IS/MND 5.7 Categorical Exemption (OPTIONAL SERVICE): If determined appropriate by the lead agency, a Notice of Exemption, as required under CEQA will be provided for the project (in lieu of the IS/MND described above). The Notice of Exemption (NOE) will cite the CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301, Existing Facilities. This Categorical Exemption applies to the minor alteration of existing public facilities, including roadways. The NOE will provide a brief project description, a description of the project site and affected area, and substantiation for the exemption. The NOE will be filed with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse upon approval by the Lead Agency. This task specifically excludes the preparation of an Initial Study, Negative Declaration, or Environmental Impact Report Categorical Exemption Deliverables: Notice of Exemption (NOE) documentation and filing. Task 6: Hydrology and Hydraulic Analyses 6.1 Hydrology and Hydraulics. Michael Baker will prepare a drainage analysis to address the existing drainage condition and the proposed mitigation and design. This report shall consider the roadway drainage tributary area of Park Avenue (project limits). This report will compare the existing street conveyance based on normal depth calculations using information provided by the City from previous hydrological study as a basis for design. The proposed lines and grades will be used to compare the capacity of the proposed street section, and drainage improvements/ mitigation will be recommended to maintain the existing levels of protection. Proposal I Page S IN'T'ERN A"T10NAL Hydraulic Calculations will be limited to street capacity calculations, inlet interception calculations, and pipe normal - depth calculations. Detailed Standard Step hydraulics (i.e. WSPG) or multi -dimensional analysis (XP-SWMM) are not expected to be required. 6.2 WQMP. Michael Baker will prepare a project specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with the Santa Ana Region Model WQMP, the Technical Guidance Document, and the Public Agency WQMP Template as cited in the Project RFP. Deliverables: Hydrology and Hydraulic Report; Water Quality Management Report (WQMP) Phase 2.0 Final Design Task 7: Final Design Drawings Prepare Final Design Drawings. All plan types shall be completed in conformance with City of Tustin standards. Design drawings will be submitted to the City for review and approval for each specified percent submittal. Plans will be prepared in AutoCAD format. The following describes the plan sheets. 7.1 Title Sheet. Prepare a project title sheet, vicinity map, general notes, and benchmark with basis of coordinates, dig alert information, list of utility companies with contact names and telephone numbers, list of standard plans, and legend of symbols in the drawing. 7.2 Typical Section and Details. Prepare and display right-of- way lines, lane and parkway dimensions, existing pavement surface and curb/gutter, existing pavement sections with proposed improvements and cross fall of slopes in the drawing. Pavement cross fall to maintain a 2% optimal. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Michael Baker shall coordinate with the City on allowable standards for arterial roadways. Incorporate construction notes related to proposed improvements on this Title Sheet and show the details required for the design on the Roadway Plan. 7.3 Roadway Improvement Plans with Removals and Utilities. Prepare plans and show the (a) utility and survey information defining the limits of work, (b) design of curb and gutter, sidewalk, pedestrian ramps and pavement improvements, (c) adjustment of manholes, vaults and valves to grade, and (d) location of right-of-way property impacts. Incorporate and display the utility relocation work in the plans and reference to utility owner design documents. Identify the need for the preservation of existing survey control monuments. Curb profiles will show existing and proposed top of curb elevations with stations and elevations. 7.4 Signing and Striping Plan. Field -verify the existing signage and striping and identify potential constraints due to the (CIP No, 10233) City, California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ("CA MUTCD"), and the latest Caltrans standard plans and specifications. 7.5 Traffic Signal Modification (Tustin Ranch Road and District Drive). Michael Baker will prepare a traffic signal modification plan at the intersection of Park Avenue and Tustin Ranch Road, and at the intersection of Park Avenue and District Drive. Michael Baker will obtain specific equipment requirements from the City. Interconnect installation information will be shown as a detail, as necessary. We assume standard Caltrans poles, foundations, and appurtenant equipment will be utilized. 7.6 Street Lighting Relocation Plan. Michael Baker will prepare a street lighting plan for Park Avenue between District Drive and Warner Avenue. This plan will address changes to the lighting layout impacted by the eastbound widening. It is also assumed the lighting fixtures are a specialty design, therefore, will be the property of the City and maintained as such. 7.7 Traffic Control Plan. Michael Baker will prepare a two (2) stage - traffic control plan for Park Avenue consistent with CA MUTCD design standards. The traffic control plan will address major items of work specific to the two primary construction items. Stage 1: Raised Median work; and Stage 2: Eastbound traffic lane widening from District Drive to Warner Avenue. It is assumed a single lane of traffic will be maintained in both directions during construction. 7.8 Drainage Plans. Michael Baker will prepare drainage plans and details for modification of the existing drainage facilities to accommodate the new street widening. The scope of the drainage plans is based on utilization of existing cross culverts and downstream drainage systems for tying in new or relocated drainage systems or extending existing systems. Deficient existing systems will be identified, whether due to the new or modified pavement section, different hydrology design criteria currently in place, or other reasons. Deficiencies due to other reasons will be presented for a policy decision by the City to incorporate into the project design and construction. Previous reports will be utilized to determine hydraulic control for any new storm drain facilities that may be connected to these existing cross -culverts and regional facilities. In the absence of such information, best professional judgment will be used to establish the required hydraulic controls. Permanent Water Quality Treatment BMP facilities will be incorporated within the drainage plans. The Treatment BMPs are anticipated to consist of bio -filtration planters near existing catch basin locations where the under drains can be readily connected to the existing storm drain systems. Edge drain plans are not anticipated and are excluded from the scope of work. proposed improvements. Prepare the signing and striping plan to show existing and proposed striping and signage 7.9 Planting Plans. Michael Baker will prepare 1"=20' scale improvements. Ensure the preparation of the signing and planting plans that indicate the species, quantity, and size of striping plan is in accordance with standards set forth by the plant material to be used. Plants will be selected to blend with the existing landscaping and comply with the City's Proposal I Pages INTER -NATIONAL Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Median paving details, a planting legend, and planting details will be included as part of this task. The drawings will include three (3) Planting Plan sheets and one (1) Planting Legend, Notes, and Details sheet 7.10 Irrigation Plans. Michael Baker will prepare 1"=20' scale irrigation plans indicating type of irrigation equipment to be used, such as the backflow preventer, master valve, irrigation controllers, pipe, valves, quick -couplers, and bubblers or dripline. The irrigation design will utilize low water use and water efficient application techniques to be compliant with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. An irrigation legend and irrigation details will be included as part of this task. The drawings will include three (3) Irrigation Plan sheet, one (1) Irrigation Legend and Notes sheet, and one (1) Irrigation Detail sheet. 7.11 Electrical. Michael Baker will provide review of the electrical systems impacted by the roadway widening. Work includes street lighting, street furniture, and landscape lighting. It is assumed no new power services will be required. 7.12 Structural Details. Michael Baker shall provide structural design services for street lighting, traffic signal, and monument sign foundations utilizing parameters provided under the geotechnical task. Foundation details and connections will be included upon the Construction Detail sheets. Deliverable: Final Design Drawings, Various Scales Task 8: Specifications 8.1 Technical Specifications. Prepare technical specifications and measurement/payment statements for each item of work in accordance with the City formatted standard specifications, and the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ("Green Book") and the State of California Standard Specifications for traffic signal, signing and striping. Deliverable: Technical Specifications Task 9: Cost Estimate 9.1 Construction Cost Estimate. Prepare quantity calculations and final construction cost estimates at the 60% and 100% submittals for the project in accordance with City requirements utilizing current construction cost data and bid items from recent projects. Use recent City unit prices, if available and applicable to this Project, and include a 5% contingency. Deliverable: Cost Estimate at Initial and Final design submittals Phase 3.0 Project Management/ Coordination/Administration Task 10: Project Management/ Scheduling/ Coordination/Administration 10.1 Project Management and Administration. Provide continuous project oversight and monthly reporting with City staff including: invoicing and project status items, schedule, and progress of the Project. INTERNA -TION AL K 10.2 Project Meetings. Three (3) project development meetings are budgeted to meet with City and project staff. Meetings include meeting agendas and notes. Deliverables: Project Management; Scheduling; (3) Project Meetings, Agenda, Notes Reimbursable Expenses. Invoices clearly identifying reimbursable expenses with supporting documentation shall be submitted when Michael Baker is requesting payment for the reproduction of notes, exhibits, drawings, technical specifications, and other documents as needed. Project Assumptions. This scope of work has been prepared based on the RFP, Amendments, and our discussion with City Staff. Only the work items identified in this Scope of Services are included in this proposal. Work items not addressed within this Scope of Services may be included by the request of the City for additional scope and fee. The following scope assumptions, exclusions and clarifications are as follows: 1) City will provide all supporting traffic data necessary to complete the design. Any traffic studies needed by Michael Baker can be provided as an amendment to this scope and fee. 2) SWPPP will be developed and maintained by the successful Construction bidder. 3) Utility relocations/agreements/and right-of-way services are assumed to be provided by the owner and are not included in this scope of work. 4) Public Outreach/Presentations are not included in this scope of work. 5) Hazardous waste investigation services are excluded from this scope of work. 6) Arbor services specific to maintaining or relocating trees is not included in this scope of work. 7) Right -of -Way mapping services are not included in this scope of work. Anticipated Challenges Michael Baker has made some initial observations of the project site that may require further review and evaluation: Street Tree Removal and Replacement The existing Palm trees located throughout the District enhance the pedestrian experience. The proposed roadway improvements and widening will impact a number of these existing trees. As a cost savings measure, Michael Baker has teamed with an Arborist to provide a technical specification for the proper handling and protection of these trees such that they can be re -used in the modified landscaping. If it is the desire of the City, the Michael Baker Team can perform a tree survey during design to determine what specific trees are appropriate for relocating. This service for additional scope and fee is optional and is at the sole discretion of the City. Proposal I Page7 l�f-�•IE" (CIP No..70233) Right -of -Way, Sidewalk, Utilities, and Landscape Design The current right-of-way for Park Avenue varies in width, however, the right-of-way dimension between District Drive and Warner Avenue is a minimum width of 92 -feet. The 92 - foot width allows for two (2) through lanes in both directions. Therefore, no additional right-of-way is anticipated. The proposed lane widening in the eastbound direction is approximately 6 -feet, thereby the proposed roadway section includes a 12 -foot wide and 14 -foot wide lane dimensions. The adjacent landscape area will be reduced to accommodate the new travel lane, which will impact the existing utility appurtenances, and possibly the meandering sidewalk. The existing sidewalk dimension is 10 -feet in width, and will be maintained unless directed otherwise. The impacted utilities include street lighting, fire hydrants, water meters, vaults, other street furniture, and a drainage inlet that will require relocation to accommodate the new curb line. Michael Baker will coordinate with the utility agencies., and the City to address impacted facilities, and ensure the new landscape will be consistent with current water conservation standards. Project Schedule The project schedule is estimated to take approximately (6) to (8) months for completion of the planning and design, specifically for the environmental approval process. If it is determined that a Categorical Exemption (CE) is the appropriate process than the schedule could be reduced to less than (6) months. We have included a project schedule in the following pages. TEAM ORGANIZATION The Michael Baker Team is prepared to commit its personnel and resources to the City of Tustin for the Park Avenue Improvements project. Michael Baker offers an experienced team that has completed numerous streetscape, pedestrian, and bicycle enhancement projects throughout southern California. Given the depth of our in-house services, Michael Baker is prepared to support the key team members on any project with over 250 additional technical and support staff located in our Irvine office. Our Organization Chart which illustrates our design staff and the relationship between the project manager, key staff and the City, is included in the proceeding pages. We have also included the time commitment of our key staff for this project. Project Manager Mr. Brian Anderson, PE will serve as Project Manager and serve as a primary contact to the City on a day-to-day basis. Mr. Anderson has served as project manager for a number of projects including Alton Parkway Extension in Irvine, Alessandro Boulevard Median in Moreno Valley, and provided key transportation design coordination for Tustin Legacy. He has proven experience working with Federal, State and Local agencies, specifically on projects within Caltrans District 12. Alternate Project Manager Mr. Fabio Escobar, PE, will serve as Deputy (Alternate) Project Manager to support Mr. Anderson. Mr. Escobar has worked closely with the City staff for over 10 years on numerous City projects including Tustin Legacy, Legacy Villas, Legacy Park, Armstrong, Barranca, Warner, and Tustin Ranch Road Street Improvements, and he is familiar with the City staff and procedures. Project Principal/QA-QC Mr. Michael Bruz, PE, has 35 years of experience of successfully delivering transportation planning and design/public works projects. He is an experienced leader who is known as a pro -active, client service oriented manager who fosters effective partnering relationships with his clients. As Project Principal, Mr. Bruz has the authority to commit staff and resources as needed for this project. Subconsultants The Michael Baker Team is enhanced by the subconsultant firms we have selected for this project that have experience in Orange County and surrounding areas, and can support the City in its effort to obtain federal funds. Our subconsultants include: C -Below (Utilities), Cogstone Resource Management (Cultural Resources), Ninyo & Moore (Geotechnical), and Dudek (Arborist). STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Local Understanding and Experience Michael Baker has been working in and for the City of Tustin for many years, including large scale planning projects, street improvement plans, and detailed planting and irrigation plans. Previous projects with the City include the SR- 55/Newport Avenue Tustin Gateway, the Tustin Legacy backbone streets, Tustin Legacy Gateway Monument, and the Edinger Avenue improvements. Extensive Streetscape and Gateway. Experience Michael Baker has decades of experience providing streetscape and gateway design services and has the ability to meet or exceed the expectations for this project and the City. Michael Baker provides the technical, practical, and creative talent to service both public and private sector clients alike to create environments that are useful, safe, aesthetic, and enjoyable. We has a proven record of managing, designing, and implementing the full range of streetscape and gateway projects. Specifically, the Michael Baker Team are project enhancement experts and specialize in preparing comprehensive Concept Development Studies that easily translate into the detailed final design elements including construction plans, and specifications for bidding and construction. Proposal I Page$ I N T E RN A -T1 0 N L -2018 2017 AUG SEPOCT AW DEC, JAN'' FEB MAR AP .Of' s Records, Research "& Potholing Environmental Documentations ISIMNDy..e.' I 4 Ehv ronmental Docwwntatlon (CE). i�tllitles _ Pavement k Soils Materlal; Reports. Preliminary Plans, Specifications & Estimates WON= Works1kop, i 5nal Plans, Specifications Estimates I l MON € ILYTAROf! n0orp WICT 011Ra€!ON Project Cot�rciinaton` Schedule MON€N!Y TNROtlGHOUI PROJECT D11RATION bask Preparation MM Agency Review; , "Meeting: VIRMITM I NTE RN A T 1 0N AC rlliT#>.l' ENGINEERING SERVICES. PARK AVENUE IMPROVEMENT ROJf,� (+CIP No. 70233) I I I Traffic Engineering/ Street Lights Ricky Chan, PE, TE, PTOE Survey/Mapping Bill Cox, PLS Tony Rai Landscape Architecture Jeremy Franzini, PLA Organization Chart Tusfl€V Brendan Dugan, PE * Environmental CEC(A Alan Ashimine Ryan Chiene Kristen Bogue Achilles Malisos Sherri Gust (4) Certified Arborist Christopher Kallstrand, CA (3) Subconsultants (1) C -Below (2) Ninyo & Moore (3) Dudek (4) Cogstone Resource Management *Key Personnel Utility Coordination Brendan Dugan, PE Chris Loera (1) Geotechnical Garreth M. Saiki, PE, GE (2) Electrical Lance Mackie, PE, LEED AP Key Staff Time Commitment Name I Role Percentage Available BrianAndersoo I Project Manager Fabio Escobar I Deputy (Alternate) Project Manager 30% Michael Brux I Project Principal/QA-QC '4 ' Brendan Dugan I Civil Engineering 20% Drainage Brad Losey, PE Water Quality Jeremy Hohnbaum, PE, QSD/QSP, LEED AP Cost Estimates Susan Pomerleau, PE Specifications Jennifer Chan, PE I NGINEIRING SEOAttY$ �... Project Experience Tustin Legacy Michael Baker has been responsible for providing professional planning and engineering services for the Tustin Legacy project as part of the redevelopment of the Tustin Marine Corps Air Station. Michael Baker prepared design plans and specifications for over two and a half miles of new roadway, a new bridge structure spanning 412 -feet over Edinger Avenue and the SCRRA/OCTA railroad, and widening approximately 1,000 -feet of Walnut Avenue, to support redevelopment of the former Tustin Marine Corps Air Station. Additionally, Michael Baker reconfigured portions of existing arterial roadways to meet the new traffic modeling. In addition, Michael Baker was responsible for the development of improvement plans for landscape and water treatment facilities (Legacy Park and Linear Park); and drainage facilities including Barranca Channel, and Peters Canyon Channel. Contact Information: City of Tustin 1 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 1 Benny Tenkean (714.573.3161) /Ken Nishikawa (714.573.3389) Completion Dates: Ongoing Total Costs of Projects: $65+ Million Team Members Involved: Brian Anderson, Fabio Escobar Alessandro Boulevard Media (Indian Street to Perris Boulevard) Michael Baker evaluated, designed, and constructed raised medians and turn pockets along Alessandro Boulevard at the Perris Boulevard intersection. The project was funded by the Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) under Caltrans District 8 Local Assistance, requiring close agency coordination of environmental, traffic, and civil transportation services. The design and construction required modification of a traffic signal, ADA -compliant pedestrian ramps, and signing and striping. The improvements were intended to provide improved safety for both vehicles and pedestrians in the project area. Michael Baker recommended alternative median types considering immediate cost versus anticipated future cost if the client should desire a landscaped median. Contact Information: City of Moreno Valley 1 14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Vailey, CA 92552 I Michael Lloyd (951.413.3146) Completion Dates: 2014 Total Costs of Projects: $1.5M Team Members Involved: Brian Anderson Alton Parkway Extension Alton Parkway is designated as a major arterial highway on the County's Foothill Circulation Phasing Plan and the Master Plan of Arterial Highways. Michael Baker provided planning and engineering services for the development of the "GAP" closure including design of a six -lane arterial highway, a major regional drainage course (Borrego Canyon Wash), and the installation of traffic signal improvements at (Irvine Boulevard, Commercentre Drive, and Towne Center). The design incorporated curb, gutter, sidewalks, ADA access ramps, and streetlights. Environmental documentation, permitting, and successfully completed CEQA clearances in 2007. Michael Baker prepared plans, and specifications for this approximately 1.25 mile reach of new roadway. The roadway alignment was severely constrained due to its immediate proximity to a portion of lands within the Nature Reserve of Orange County, the proposed EI Toro Federal Wildlife Refuge, the Borrego Canyon Wash and the ongoing landfill activities by the Navy within the former MCAS EI Toro. This project also included the design of a wildlife corridor that provided a connection to the City of Irvine's Great Park. Contact Information: County of Orange 1 300 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, CA 92703 1 Kasey Nielsen (714.647.3913) Completion Dates: 2011 Total Costs of Project: $18 M Team Members Involved: Brian Anderson Sand Canyon Avenue Grade Separation at the Metrolink/BNSF Railroad The City of Irvine constructed a grade separation for Sand Canyon Avenue, a major arterial paralleling S.R. 133 between 1-5 and 1-405, at the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA)/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)/Metrolink railroad tracks. The goal was to realign Sand Canyon Avenue to the northwest and depress the roadway below the Metrolink Railroad. The project consisted of a two -span steel and concrete structure supporting Metrolink, Amtrak, and BNSF trains. The structure included a steel deck and steel plate girder bridge superstructure with two sacrificial exterior concrete girders, abutments, wing walls, temporary shoring, temporary double -track shoofly alignment southwest of the new bridge structure and elimination of the existing at -grade crossing. The grade separation required raising the existing track elevations approximately 1.5 feet to allow roadway clearance. The project lowered Sand Canyon Avenue under the railroad tracks and widened the roadway from four (4) lanes to six (6) lanes. Key challenges included: • Complex construction staging for maintenance of operations, including cars, bicycle, pedestrian traffic, rail, and trucks • Landscaped medians and parkways, including "heritage" oak tree preservation Traffic signal design, interconnect, queue cutter signal design, and street lighting Coordination with multiple utility agencies for major transmission and distribution facility relocations "'ViY- Proposal I Page9 INTERNATIONAL ?47�i11h. . NT , , . 1�►,. iia 'ilei) Contact Information: City of Irvine I One Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA 92623 1 Tom Perez (949.724.6442) Completion Dates: 2012 Total Costs of Project: $75 M Team Members Involved: Brian Anderson Resumes of Key Personnel BRIAN ANDERSON, PEI PROJECT MANAGER / CIVIL ENGINEERING Civil Engineer, CA, 1996, #55298; AZ, CO (pending) Education: B.S., 1986, Civil Engineering, California State University at Long Beach Mr. Anderson has over 30 years of experience in transportation/public works engineering. He supervises engineering and design staff, and specializes in transportation and public works design projects. He has managed projects with multi -discipline activities, and multi -jurisdictional oversite. His management role covers preliminary design elements through final design and construction. His current projects including complex roadway and highway system development; Multi -use trails; Street Enhancement; and roadway reconstruction. A significant number of Mr. Anderson's projects include various Caltrans permit and oversight projects. Legacy Park/Tustin Legacy (Tustin, CA) Washington Boulevard Reconstruction (Commerce, CA) Tustin Ranch Road, Warner and Armstrong Street Improvements (Tustin, CA) FABIO ESCOBAR, PEI DEPUTY (ALTERNATE) PROJECT MANAGER Civil Engineer, CA, 1990, #45662 Education: B.S., 1983, Civil Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles Mr. Escobar has diverse civil engineering experience in the commercial, educational, healthcare, and residential fields. He has a broad range of experience covering many types of land development and public works projects. His strengths are in on- and off-site planning and design. He uses his diverse experience to successfully complete and review complex multi -disciplined projects. Mr. Escobar is personally familiar with the City of Tustin's policies and staff having worked on several projects in the past few years including: Armstrong, Barranca, Warner & Tustin Ranch Road Street Improvements (Tustin, CA) Tustin Legacy SAMP(Tustin, CA) Barranca Channel, Moffett Bridge & Peters Canyon Channel MICHAEL BRUZ, PEI PROJECT PRINCIPAL/QA-QC Civil Engineer, CA, 1983, #36198; Also in AZ, NV, Ml, VT Education: B.S., 1979, Civil Engineering, Michigan State University Mr. Bruz has 35 years of experience of successfully delivering transportation planning and design/public works projects. He is well versed in all project phases including environmental planning, preliminary engineering, PS&E preparation, value analysis, construction management and dispute resolution. His relevant experience includes streetscape projects for Beverly Hills, Fullerton, Newport Beach and many others. Mr. Bruz has managed numerous multidiscipline teams and has a thorough understanding of the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. A sampling of Mr. Bruz's relevant project experience includes: Fullerton Plaza (Fullerton, CA) m Balboa Boulevard — Adams Street to A Street (Newport Beach, CA) Uptown Sedona Streetscape Improvements (Sedona, AZ) BRENDAN DUGAN, PE I CIVIL ENGINEERING Civil Engineer, CA, 2011, #79075 Education: B.S., 2007, Civil Engineering, California State University at Fullerton Mr. Dugan has over 10 years of experience in civil and transportation engineering. He has worked extensively with Caltrans, Orange County Public Works, LA County Sanitation District, and various municipalities on numerous projects throughout Southern California. Mr. Dugan's experience includes horizontal and vertical geometrics, ADA compliance, pavement rehabilitation, intersection widening, field reviews, project coordination and management, agency coordination, project specification document preparation, and development of construction cost estimates. Sepulveda Blvd. (SR -1) and Mariposa Avenue Intersection Improvements (EI Segundo, CA) Technology Drive Extension (Irvine, CA) Tustin Avenue/La Palma Avenue Intersection Widening, (Anaheim, CA) Laguna Canyon Road (SR -133) and Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) Sidewalk Repairs and ADA Implementation (Laguna Beach, CA) Proposal I Page 10 INT-ERNAT1ON-AL lN'reRNATloNAL 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, CA 92618 949.472.3505 mbakerintl.com V U 3 µ xrx 5 r � I'M i F py ii N I 1 fl$ 8it His9 e! a$ S:Ig 8$ S S R g F F a 8 B B 91 S1 A a A - -9-9 F a d F 3 F 8ia$ 3$ s�a s ee$s sass salsa y, ss i S$ 8, ! 8 3 3 F 8 1S 8 8 4 A 9 9 9 4 Q A %I& a S S 9 A$ fi i R 3t 9 R 9�d Y & 3 3 RE 4 3 eig s � Blaina rRa 4 s as aa:�aa 'Ia SAA gazes ¢:a a ass a sass s e5 s fiP l - sa d o ',P 8 a - s $ fl 8 R 8 c 9 E a3 8 2 3 3 e :i Y R C i N — i u c r x � I e. 4 _ C r O 8 � � � I r rF F "I I tl i gg i. S i k R r S R I 8 $ i 6�A34 8 8 8 $ 8 i 8 8 F B S 8 8 S e3 g $ ¢ 9 R R ~ FJ Y y}a g g g B a s s 8 8 8 8 8 a a s a 6 ! S R$ R a x s s s S 9 9 G a I e = s� Y86idsaA'rABRs s s ssss ssesa s as �a - -� a - !k.3A w YI g } a 3 •� 3 3 e 8 9 d n 5 5 5 6 5 g 3 8 C } 3 8 3 9 Sl � 3 3 S i p � s A ii k" '� v 8k el$ R R a' 3 8 S 5 z$ g i = - a m � i Ll 0 of