HomeMy WebLinkAbout12 SECOND READING & ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1469Agenda Item 12
AGENDA REPORT Reviewed:CityManager
Finance Director N!A
MEETING DATE: AUGUST 16, 2016
TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER
FROM: ERICA N. RABE, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1469
SUMMARY:
Ordinance No. 1469 amends Tustin City Code (TCC) to establish preferential permit
only parking on Birchfield Drive, Sandbrook Drive and Silverbrook Drive.
RECOMMENDATION:
Have second reading by title only and adoption of Ordinance No. 1469 (roll call vote).
BACKGROUND:
On August 2, 2016, the City Council had first reading by title only of the following
Ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 1469
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING TUSTIN CITY CODE SUBSECTION 5331n REGARDING DESIGNATION
OF ZONES FOR PARKING BY PERMIT ONLY
ORDINANCE NO. 1469
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TUSTIN CITY CODE
SUBSECTION 5331n REGARDING DESIGNATION OF
ZONES FOR PARKING BY PERMIT ONLY
The City Council of the City of Tustin, California, hereby ordains as follows:
SECTION I: The City Council finds and determines:
A. That Section 22507(a) of the State of California Vehicle Code grants cities the
authority to establish preferential parking on designated streets or portions thereof,
during all or certain times of the day, upon approval by the City Council of an ordinance
or resolution containing provisions that are reasonable and necessary to assure the
effectiveness of a preferential parking program, and after signs giving adequate notice
of such regulations are placed.
B. That the City Council has determined that, for a variety of reasons that differ by
location in the City, parking in certain locations in the City is impacted, and at times,
residents and their guests are unable to find parking spaces in convenient proximity to
their residences. A lack of adequate parking within convenient proximity to
residences can have an adverse impact on safety of the traveling and pedestrian
public, and may adversely affect the quality of residential living.
C. That in light of the foregoing, it is beneficial to the business merchants, the
residents and to the safety and welfare of the community as a whole, to establish a
process for the designation of locations for preferential parking privileges to better
ensure availability of adequate parking within convenient proximity to residences.
D. That this Code amendment is regulatory in nature, and the City of Tustin has a
substantial interest in protecting the health and safety and welfare of the public
including those traveling upon and parking upon City streets.
E. That on August 2, 2016, a public meeting was duly noticed, called, and held
concerning this Code amendment.
F. That the Code amendment regulates the use of existing public highways and
streets for public health, safety and welfare purposes, directs a minor alteration in the
operation of the City roadway system, and as such, the Class 1 Existing Facilities
exemption in the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Section 15301
applies.
Ordinance No. 1469
Page 1 of 4
G. That the proposed amendment is reasonably necessary to protect the health,
safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Tustin.
SECTION II: Subsection 5331n of the Tustin City Code is hereby amended to add
subsection (15) and to read in its entirety as follows:
5331 STOPPING, STANDING OR PARKING RESTRICTED OR PROHIBITED
ON CERTAIN STREETS
n Parking by Permit Only
The following area(s) have been designated to require a special parking
permit to park vehicles on the streets between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m.,
seven (7) days a week.
(1) Heatherfield Drive and Sandwood Place between Mitchell Avenue and
Cloverbrook Drive
(2) Rosalie Place and Quent Drive
(3) Cindy Lane and Lefty Lane
(4) Cloverbrook Drive
(5) Myrtle Avenue between Second Street and Main Street
(6) Main Street between Pasadena Avenue and Pacific Street (north side of
Main Street), Lorelei Lane; and Myrtle Avenue, Medallion Avenue,
California Street, Pacific Street and Corla Avenue north of McFadden
Avenue
(7) South side of Mitchell Avenue between Heatherfield Drive and Browning
Avenue
(8) Copperfield Drive between Red Hill Avenue and Sandbrook Drive
(9) Sandfield Place between Browning Avenue and Fernbrook Drive
N
Ordinance No. 1469
Page 2 of 4
(10) Debusk Lane; Raleigh Place; Walter Avenue; and Del Amo Avenue
between Nisson Road and Mitchell Avenue
(11) Carfax Avenue and Utt Drive between Mitchell Avenue and Nisson Road;
Charloma Drive and Woodlawn Avenue between Veeh Drive and Nisson
Road; North side of Mitchell Avenue between Carfax Avenue and Utt Drive;
and Veeh Drive
(12) Almside Drive, Atherton Lane, Birmingham Place, Denbigh Lane,
Foresterra Lane, Grassmere Lane, Hamlet Lane, Kipling Lane, Langdale
Lane, Penrith Lane, Tenby Lane, Tupelo Lane, Walden Lane, Wildeve
Lane, and Windemere Lane
(13) Shadybrook Drive and Fernbrook Drive
(14) Carfax Drive South of Sycamore, Charloma Drive North of Sycamore, Del
Amo Avenue West of Mear Lane, Drayton Avenue, and Mear Lane
(15) Birchfield Drive, Sandbrook Drive and Silverbrook Drive
SECTION III: This Ordinance shall become effective on the 31St day after its adoption on
the second reading. The newly designated permit -only parking area shall be enforced
after signs are placed on the restricted portions of the City streets giving notice of the
permit -only parking restrictions.
SECTION IV: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or
phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason, held to be
unconstitutional or invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this
Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause,
and phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council for the City of
Tustin on the 16th day of August 2016.
JOHN NIELSEN,
Mayor
Ordinance No. 1469
Page 3 of 4
ATTEST:
ERICA N. RABE,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DAVID E. KENDIG,
City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, ERICA N. RABE, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City
Council of the City of Tustin is 5; that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 1469
was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th
day of August 2016 by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES:
COUNCILMEMBER NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT:
ERICA N. RABE,
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 1469
Page 4 of 4