Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 PC Minutes 5-12-03ITEM #1 7:05 p.m. Given All present Staff present None Approved Adopted Resolution No. 3869 MINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING m 7:00 P.M. MAY 12, 2003 CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Elizabeth Binsack, Community Development Director Lois Bobak, Deputy City Attorney Doug Anderson, Senior Project Manager-Transportation Karen Peterson, Senior Planner Scott Reekstin, Senior Planner Minoo Ashabi, Associate Planner Matt West, Assistant Planner Eloise Harris, Recording Secretary PUBLIC CONCERNS , APPROVAL OF MINUTES- APRIL 28, 2003, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. It was moved by Pontious, seconded by Nielsen, to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HF_..ARINGS , CONTINUED CODE AMENDMENT 03-003 (SECOND RESIDENTIAL UNITS) TO IMPOSE STANDARDS ON SECOND UNITS. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3869 recommending that the City Council adopt Code Amendment No. 03-003 to amend Chapter 2 of Article 9 of the Tustin City Code relating to second residential units and detached dwellings. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003 - Page 1 Reekstin Jennings Reekstin Nielsen Director Adopted Resolution No. 3873, as amended 7:11 p.m. Matt West Menard West Amante Stated there was no need for a staff report since a report had been presented at the previous meeting. Asked if this ordinance would have any effect on the recently adopted ordinance regarding setbacks. Responded in the negative. Asked if any of the costs incurred will be recoverable from the State. Indicated that similar cost-recovery requests have not been successful in the past. It was moved by Pontious, seconded by Menard, to adopt Resolution No. 3869. Motion carried 5-0. , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 03-009 REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH AN ANTIQUE AUTOMOBILE GALLERY, INCLUDING ACCESSORY VEHICLE AND MEMORABILIA SALES, COMPLETELY WITHIN AN EXISTING 7,752 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING AT 300 EL CAMINO REAL. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 300 EL CAMINO REAL IN THE CENTRAL COMMERCIAL (C-2) ZONING DISTRICT. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3873 approving Conditional Use Permit 03-009 to establish an antique and classic automobile gallery, including accessory vehicle and memorabilia sales, completely within an existing 7,752 square foot building at 300 El Camino Real. The Public Hearing opened. Presented the staff report. Asked what the required parking count will be. Answered that 40 spaces are required and 27 spaces would be provided on-site in accordance with Variance 95-001. Asked if the cars will be visible through the floor-to-ceiling windows facing the street. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 2 West Answered in the affirmative. Greg Bennett, architect representing the applicant Thanked staff for the prompt processing of the application; asked for clarification regarding the hours of operation required by Condition 4.6; and, requested the curb and sidewalk improvements to the north of the building be limited to the smaller sections that were identified by the Traffic Engineer. Anderson Responded only the damaged sections require improvement. Mr. Bennett Noted that, although those are existing depressions from subsidence or wear and tear not related to this development and are the City's right-of-way and sidewalk and not the owner's responsibility, the applicant would agree to repair those; the driveway apron on El Camino Real is in non-compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements but is in the public right-of-way and is also the City's responsibility; removing the driveway would present a financial hardship for the applicant; an exception to that condition is being requested to reduce the cost to the applicant. Jennings Asked if Mr. Bennett was referring to Condition 3.2. Mr. Bennett Answered in the affirmative; stated the City Engineer and Mr. Doug Anderson were at the site today, pointed out the driveway apron is in non-compliance with ADA but is in the public right-of- way, is substantially in compliance and can be modified by going onto private property and creating a clear and legal pathway to comply without alteration; that alteration could occur on private property by reducing the curve of the existing driveway planters and creating a clear path for handicapped people to pass; there is a City standard that allows for that deviation. Anderson Indicated he met with the applicant at the site; the driveway is currently in non-compliance with the ADA requirements; an alternative was offered for the applicant to put the ADA flat area back on private property which would require an easement to the City by the property owner; construction would not be allowed to proceed until an easement could be approved; the City Council took an action in January .2003 that identified driveways as the responsibility of the property owner; it is the property owner's responsibility to bring driveways into compliance when discretionary actions or any land use changes or changes from residential to commercial are approved. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 3 Jennings Anderson Jennings Mr. Bennett Jennings Nielsen Mr. Bennett Jennings Mr. Bennett Jennings Mr. Bennett Jennings Mr. Bennett Asked if the Traffic Engineer was suggesting an alternative to Condition 3.2. Answered there are two standards; the one quoted in the staff report is City Standard No. 209; the other is City Standard No. 208 that would allow the easement back on private property with additional modifications to provide the ADA path around the existing driveway. Asked Mr. Bennett if the applicant would like both those standards included in the condition, to provide an alternative. Indicated in the affirmative, adding that a financial study could be performed to find a more affordable approach. Suggested that Condition 3.2 be modified to allow for compliance with Standard Nos. 208 or 209. Asked what is anticipated regarding vehicles being rotated in and out of the building on a monthly basis. Indicated the applicant has sold no vehicles during the past year; the interior is suitable for 20 vehicles; rotating of vehicles is not anticipated. Asked if potential buyers would be allowed to test drive the vehicles. Stated that anyone with the proper qualifications would be allowed to arrange a test drive; the car would be pushed outside; the batteries would be re-connected, and the car could then be test driven. Asked if the vehicles meet California's emission standards. Answered that most of the vehicles are exempt by age from emission standards, but all the vehicles are licensed and registered to Mr. Barrera. Asked if it is the intention of the applicant to operate within the 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. timeframe, but not necessarily keeping those hours. Answered in the affirmative; stated the hours would be posted within the building; and, asked if Condition 4.8 could be modified to allow for a sign to be constructed in the future on existing architecture at the site. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 4 Jennings Mr. Bennett Jennings Director Pontious Jennings John Kelly, 330 El Camino, an Old Town businessman 7:32 p.m. Jennings Director Jennings Nielsen Amante Anderson Asked Mr. Bennett to clarify whether or not there is currently a plan to create a sign. Indicated the applicant would like the condition modified to allow permission for professionally painted white letters to be placed on the blue structure that defines the primary entrance on the south side of the building; the blue element on the fagade is a former sign that has been painted over; the Sign Code would allow two signs on this property. Asked the Director to respond. Stated such a sign would require a sign code exception; a separate application would be required; the site is not eligible for a pole sign. Noted such a sign would be a poor precedent for this area. Invited the public to speak to this item. Offered strong support for this project, suggesting it will add elegance and class to the Old Town neighborhood and create interest that will bring more visitors to Old Town. The Public Hearing closed. Noted the recent ordinance requiring that the ground floor space in Old Town be retail; stated her concern that there will be a used car aspect to the proposed use; and, asked about the standard condition that prohibits any repair work taking place on the street. Stated that code enforcement concerns related to civil penalties could be included that would allow for a $100 fine per violation. Asked staff to provide language to be included in the conditions of approval. Suggested the project sounds as though it will create more of a historical museum aspect, rather than a commercial flavor. Asked if staff is comfortable with the eight sections of sidewalk that Mr. Bennett referred to regarding what needs to be done under Condition 3.1. Answered in the affirmative. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 5 Amante Referred to Condition 4.6 requiring that the business "shall" be open to the general public from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., suggesting that Mr. Bennett indicated those are the outside parameters of business hours but that the proposed business may not be open for those periods of time; and, asked if the language should be modified. Peterson Stated the intent of the condition is to ensure that this project is a showroom that will be open during regular business hours, allowing accessibility for visitors to Old Town. Amante Noted his understanding that Condition 4.6 requires any change in the designated hours of operation be agreed upon administratively. Peterson Indicated Commissioner Amante's understanding was correct. Director Stated the following language could be added to Condition 1.6: "Any violation of any of the conditions imposed is subject to the payment of a civil penalty of $100 for each violation or other such amount the City Council may establish by ordinance or resolution and for each day the violation exists, subject to the applicable notice, hearing, and appeal process as established by the City Council by ordinance." Add Condition 1.7 as follows: "The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with any necessary code enforcement action, including attorneys' fees, subject to the applicable notice, hearing, and appeal process as established by the City Council by ordinance." Amante Stated this project is a unique and appropriate use for Old Town and would be a draw to the neighborhood due to the classic nature of the cars; restoring the building to a museum use would be a positive for Old Town. Pontious Indicated her support of staffs recommendation, with the modifications noted above. Nielsen Suggested the use will add an historic flare that blends well in Old Town. Mr. Bennett Stated the hours of operation set forth in Condition 4.6 were outside parameters; to ask a business on El Camino Real to be open seven days a week during those hours would place an undue financial burden on the applicant; such a requirement is Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 6 Pontious Mr. Bennett Jennings Director Mr. Bennett Commissioners Mr. Bennett Jennings Amante Nielsen Adopted Resolution No. 3871 and Resolution No. 3872, as amended seldom applied to retail merchants; such a constraint, particularly on Sunday when businesses are not typically open in Old Town, presents an undue burden. Suggested that staff is not requiring the business necessarily be open during those hours; the applicant may present an optional timeframe to staff. Stated his concern is not to be in a future dilemma if an agreement on hours of operation cannot be reached. Suggested that staff will be reasonable; the hours stated are maximum parameters the business should be open. Noted these are the hours that were presented to staff by the applicant. Clarified the hours were presented as outside hours, not as limiting hours. Suggested several alternatives. Stated any specific limitation would be unacceptable; the applicant wishes to remain open as long as it is economically viable to do so. Indicated the condition should be left as it is; the applicant can go to the staff with requested modifications; staff's desire is for the establishment to be open and available to visitors to Old Town. Suggested it is not the Commission's function to set specific hours of operation on given days; the hours of operation can be arranged with the staff. Added that he supports the project as long as it is a full-time historical automobile museum retail business. It was moved by Amante to adopt Resolution No. 3873, as amended, seconded by Pontious. Motion carried 5-0. , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 02-026 AND DESIGN REVIEW 02-032 REQUESTING' 1) AUTHORIZATION FOR SITE BUILDING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A 22,208 SQUARE FEET Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 7 Amante 7:45 p.m. Ashabi Nielsen Ashabi Nielsen Ashabi Nielsen COMMERCIAL CENTER AND A 75,491 SQUARE FOOT SELF STORAGE FACILITY; AND 2) AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH RETAIL USE, RESTAURANT USES WITH A TOTAL OF 123 SEATS, A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY, AND A CARETAKER UNIT WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL (M) ZONING DISTRICT. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt: , Resolution No. 3871 adopting the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Design Review 02-032 and Conditional Use Permit 02-026 for development of a 22,208 square foot commercial center and 75,491 square foot self-storage facility; . Resolution No. 3872 approving Design Review 02-032 for site and architectural design of the project; and Conditional Use Permit 02-026 to establish retail uses, restaurant uses with up to 123 seats, and a self-storage facility with a caretaker unit within the Industrial (M) zoning district. Stated a conflict of interest related to the proposed project, recused himself, and stepped down from the dais. The Public Hearing opened. Presented the staff report. Asked if the back wall of the building is 375 feet long by 30 feet high. Answered in the affirmative, specifying that only a portion of the building will be three-story. Asked for clarification regarding the height allowed for the light poles. Stated the maximum height would be 20 feet. Asked if there would be any light spill. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 8 Nielsen Ashabi Pontious Ashabi Nielsen Ashabi Jennings Ashabi Menard Jonathan Higginson, representing Wieland Associates Jennings Mr. Higginson Menard Mr. Higginson Nielsen Asked if the maturity of the landscape screen is anticipated to be achieved in approximately two to three years. Replied in the affirmative, adding that bamboo grows quickly. Asked for clarification concerning the Starbucks coffee shop opening at 6:00 a.m. Answered that the second sentence of Condition 5.3 requires that Starbucks would need to submit a site-specific noise analysis to the Community Development Director for approval. Asked if it is anticipated that it will be about two years before the residents of Tustin Meadows will see the vegetation. Answered in the affirmative. Asked how far the structure will be from the first residence. Responded approximately 120 feet. Asked for information regarding the impact of the anticipated one decibel increase in the noise level. Stated one decibel is typically regarded as inaudible to the average person; three decibels is the level normally heard by the human ear; the exception could be a change in the nature of the noise depending upon which frequencies might be reflected from the building. Asked Mr. Higginson what impact the train noise would have. Indicated there are various noises as the train passes--the engine noise and the wheels on the track--that would be reflected from the new buildings; however, the train on the track would also act as a barrier to the reflected noise; those elements are included in the estimated one decibel increase. Asked how much impact the vegetation would have on the noise. Responded the vegetation makes very little difference. Asked if the train's whistle was taken into account. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 9 Mr. Higginson Bill Reseigh, architect, representing the applicant Pontious Peterson Jennings Pontious Jennings Mr. Reseigh Menard Nielsen Indicated the analysis was based on measurements made at the adjacent residential site, including every noise level from each train pass; and, stated he had no information whether or not the analysis included whistle noise. Stated the project took a year and a half to get to the Planning Commission and made the following requests regarding the conditions of approval: (1) Conditions 3.13 and 3.16: asked that "or as amended" be added at the end. (2) Condition 3.17: clarified that the condition refers to habitable spaces and not storage units. Clarified that the north elevation at the rear facing the railroad tracks is only partially 30 feet and two story for the remainder. Asked for staff clarification on the requested amendments by Mr. Reseigh; and, suggested "or as amended" is not the appropriate solution. Stated that staff prefers that no changes be made to the conditions related to noise mitigation; if warranted, Condition 3.22 allows for modifications during plan check and prior to issuance of a building permit. Invited the public to speak; no one came forward. Indicated she was sorry to see The Barn go, but, given the odd shape of this property, this seems an appropriate use for the site; and, supported staff's findings. Asked if all the businesses indicated on the plans are expected at this location. Stated that letters of intent have been received from most of the businesses. Agreed that this will be a nice addition to the City; and, complimented staff on a job well done. Indicated he had some concerns regarding the noise level; and, asked if there is any way to reduce the noise further by adding additional landscaping or other features. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003 - Page 10 Director Nielsen 8:10 p.m. Continued to the June 9, 2003, Planning Commission meeting 8:11 p.m. West Director Jennings Answered that staff can ask the acoustical engineer to give the noise issue further consideration during plan check. Stated that would be appropriate since several residents have expressed concern about the noise level increasing. The Public Hearing closed. It was moved by Menard, seconded by Nielsen, to adopt Resolution No. 3871 and Resolution No. 3872, as amended. Motion carried 4-0. o CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 02-018 AND DESIGN REVIEW 02-018 AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION OF A 2,983 SQUARE FOOT FAST-FOOD RESTAURANT, WITH A DRIVE-THRU LANE AND OUTDOOR DINING AREA, AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 171 EAST FIRST STREET. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE DESIGNATED "COMMERCIAL" WITHIN THE FIRST STREET SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING DISTRICT. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3870 approving Conditional Use Permit 02-018 to construct a 2,983 square foot fast-food restaurant, with a drive-thru lane and outdoor dining area, on the northwest corner of Prospect Avenue and First Street. The property is located at 171 East First Street and can be further described as Assessor Parcel Number 401-532-36. The Public Hearing opened. Presented the staff report. Added this is a small site that was previously a service station; there have been numerous requests to put various uses on this site over the years; this has not been an easy project; the drive- thru lane is a special concern requiring the conditions included in the staff report; staff's reason for recommending approval is that the appliCant has submitted a queuing analysis that shows the drive-thru will work as long as people use it the way the design is intended. Asked which condition requires the seven foot wall. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 11 Staff Indicated Condition 7.4. West Jennings Anderson Amante West Amante Anderson Pontious Director Pontious Added that a minimum six foot eight inch wall would be permitted. Asked for an explanation of how the drive-thru will work. Pointed out on the site plan where a sign will be posted indicating to people traveling southbound on Prospect Street that the drive-thru entrance is on First Street; indicated that, while the route is circuitous, the intent was to prevent people from using the Prospect entrance to enter the drive-thru; the primary concern is cars queuing up across the sidewalk and into the public right-of-way. Asked what will be proposed for the patio and whether or not it will be visible from the street. Provided a handout showing the patio seating will be round concrete tables and will be reviewed at plan check. Asked if there had been any analysis of any other patterns to avoid people coming into the site from Prospect. Replied that the queuing analysis provided was based on data from three other sites currently operating as Farmer Boys restaurants; some of the higher generating fast food uses require 12-vehicle stacking distance, Taco Bell requires 8; Carl's Jr. requires 8; different parameters are based upon the amount of drive-thru generation and the characteristics of the restaurant; empirical information from other Farmer Boys sites resulted in this determination; other iterations did not seem plausible from a pedestrian standpoint; this proposal was the best scenario, given the site constraints. Asked if the hours of operation that apply to the inside seating could be amended to allow longer hours than the drive-thru and outside seating. Answered in the affirmative. Suggested amending the indoor hours of operation to 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 12 Bob Veriato, representing Farmer Boys Restaurant Ron Underwood, architect for the project Tiffany Stroupe, 185 Lockwood Park Place Brian McGinnis, 165 Lockwood Park Place Patrick Stroupe, 185 Lockwood Park Place Deborah Jacobson, 195 Lockwood Park Place Stated the features of a Farmer Boys Restaurant; and, referred to several items of concern (his written comments were presented to staff and are incorporated herein by reference) as follows: 1. Posting $1,500.00 bond every five years for potential removal of the driveway; 2. Rooftop equipment decibel requirement and cost involved; 3. Hours of operation beginning at 6:00 a.m.; 4. Unreasonable requirement for revisiting the Conditional Use Permit and Design Review annually; 5. Unfairly requiring upgraded ordering system whenever new technology becomes available; and, 6. Traffic study and potential mitigation measures regarding traffic. Stated the applicant and architect worked with staff to design this building in a manner reflective of the Old Town charm the City seeks; and, added he was available for any questions staff might have. Stated she lives directly north of the proposed use; and, added her concern was that such a use located so near a Iow-density neighborhood will impact the quality of the lives and the privacy of the residents of that neighborhood. Stated his concern was primarily with the trash container and its proposed close proximity to the residential neighborhood; and, asked for the hours of trash collection, referring specifically to the noise created by early morning trash trucks. Moved to the back of the Council Chamber and, speaking without a microphone, stressed how easily he could be heard and how well the neighborhood north of the site would be able to hear the speaker and the people in the parking lot and on the patio; since his wife has asthma, he would appreciate a study concerning the impact on her health of the exhaust emitted by idling automobiles; people from other nearby fast food locations currently present a problem, i.e. parking to eat in their cars and then leaving their trash on the streets of this neighborhood. Indicated that her concerns were related to the additional noise pollution this site will cause in the neighborhood, referring specifically to the rooftop equipment; and, requested that the Commission not approve the conditional use permit for the drive-thru use. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 13 Jeremy Jacobson, 195 Lockwood Park Place Matt Hurtado, 170 North D Street Phil Cox, 435 El Camino Real 9:12 p.m. Jennings Nielsen Menard Stated his opposition to the restaurant project; asked Commissioner Amante, who is an attorney, to explain the impact of this project on the neighborhood's "right to quiet enjoyment"; and, stated the proposed Farmer Boys site at 17th Street and Tustin Avenue only 1.5 miles away seems better- suited to this use. Indicated he does not live as close to the proposed site as the previous speakers; stated his concern is for the young children living in the neighborhood who will be put at risk due to the additional traffic, graffiti, loitering, etc.; indicated that it does not seem fair to be more lenient with the concerns regarding rooftop equipment noise, lighting, etc. for Farmer Boys than with the health, safety, and welfare of the nearby residents; and, added that he opposes the approval of this project. Stated his support for the project, indicating it seems a better use than others that have existed on the site in the past and uses currently operating on First Street. The Public Hearing closed. Thanked the members of the public for sharing their concerns; reiterated that this site is a commercial lot and something has to be allowed there; stated the First Street Specific Plan requires that the building be located close to the street with services such as trash collection, parking, etc. in the rear, but there may be mitigation measures that could be implemented to ease the residents' concerns; and, referred to the graffiti controls within the City being swift and effective. Stated the drive-thru facility presents the potential for noise and traffic jams; noted that other elements of the application do not seem workable; suggested that staff and the applicant need to come up with a more logical configuration; and, asked for comments from other Commissioners. Stated his appreciation to the residents for coming forward with their concerns; noted his understanding that staff did a good job trying to accommodate the drive-thru, but it still appears to be cumbersome; and, agreed with Commissioner Jennings' comments regarding the need for more staff input before he could support the project. Thanked the public for attending; and, added his concerns regarding the configuration of the drive-thru. Minutes- Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 14 Amante Pontious Amante Jennings Director Jennings Pontious Director Amante Nielsen Echoed the comments of the above Commissioners, adding that the Commission pays attention to the concerns of residents living near these types of projects; agreed with Commissioner Pontious that allowing longer hours of operation for the inside use might be a way of balancing the issues raised. Stated the Planning Commission is faced with balancing the needs of the surrounding residents and the property owner; and, suggested continuing this item to allow staff to work with the applicant to alleviate the residents' concerns. Asked staff to reconsider the noise allowance regarding the rooftop equipment; and, requested that the standards be kept to the residential decibel levels. Agreed with Commissioner Amante; and, reiterated the possibility of eliminating the driveway and allowing the interior restaurant longer hours of operation. Asked the Commission to provide more direction and a consensus regarding discretionary approval of the drive-thru and the outdoor seating; a restaurant could be allowed without a discretionary action from the Commission. Stated she would not approve the project with the drive-thru as presently submitted; and, if restricted to reasonable hours, would be able to approve outdoor seating. Agreed that the elimination of the drive-thru and/or removing the entrance from Prospect Avenue would be options that could make the project more acceptable. Stated staff would need to look at those options from a design perspective. Indicated that, without the drive-thru, the two driveways as now configured would be acceptable; if the drive-thru is to remain, a new configuration would be necessary; closing Prospect Avenue would make the site less attractive, less viable, and less appropriate to the First Street Specific Plan. Added his support for the removal of the drive-thru but keeping both entrances to the site. It was moved by Amante to continue this item to the first Planning Commission meeting in June, seconded by Nielsen. Motion carried 5-0. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 15 None REGULAR BUSINESS STAFF CONCERNS . REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN AT THE MAY 5, 2003, CITY COUNCIL MEETING. Director reported The City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 03-63 and 03-72 which provide the necessary approvals for Final Environmental Impact Report 90-1 as revised by Final Supplement #1 for the Newport Avenue extension. COMMISSION CONCERNS Jennings Thanked staff for their work on tonight's items. Stated the tour of the Water Works was fascinating. Noted the Home Tour was well-attended. Amante Indicated the bus mentioned at previous meetings is still parked in the Bally's parking lot; and, asked that Code Enforcement investigate and report back to the Commission. Echoed Commissioner Jennings' comments regarding the tour of the Water Works. Added his appreciation to staff for their thorough reports. Pontious Thanked staff. Menard Thanked staff. Nielsen Stated he enjoyed the Water Works tour. Thanked staff for their reports. 9:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Monday, June 9, 2003, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. Minutes - Planning Commission May 12, 2003- Page 16