Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1969 07 07 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL July 7, 1969 CALL TO Meeting called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Coco. ORDER II. PLEDGE OF Led by Mayor Coco° ALLEGIANCE !II. INVOCATION Given by Mayor Coco. IV. ROLL Present: Councilmen: Coco, Mack, C. Miller, Marsters, L: Miller. CALL Absent: Councilmen: None Others Present: City Administrator Harry Gill City Attorney James Rourke City Clerk Ruth Poe Planning Director James Supinger V. APPROVAL OF Moved. by Mack~ seconded by Marsters that minutes of June 16~ 1969, MINUTES be app~.oved as mailed. Carried. ** RESOLUTION NO. 1007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNiA, COMMENDING RONALD I, KLINGELHOFER Moved by C. Miller~ seconded by Mack that Resolution No. 1007 be read in its entirety. Carried. Moved by C. Millerr seconded by Marsters that Resolution No. 1007, commending Ronald I. Klingelhofer, be passed and adopted. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Coco, Mack, C. Miller, Marsters, L. Miller. Noes: None. Absent: None. Mayo~ Coco presented above Resolution and picture uo Dr. Klingelhofero Vi. PUBLIC 1. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF A MEMBER OF THE TUSTIN PLANNING HEARINGS COMMISSION. Mayor Coco explained ~lhe legal requirements for this hearing and gave a resume of the dutie~ of a Commissioner. Hearing opened at 7:40 P.M, The following applicants were present and expressed their desires to become a member of the Commission. Mr. Sheldon Edelstein, 14661 Berkshire Place Mr. CasperHare, 13422 Diamond Head Mr. James Harris, 14621 Yorba Streeu " Mr. George Shambeck, 13502 Loreuta Drive Mr. Milton Curtis, 13362 Cromwell Drive Councilman C. Miller suggested that as the applicants are not known to all the Council it ~aight be well if a subcommittee be appointed to interview the applicants and report to the Council. Moved by Mack~ seconded by Marsters that a subcommittee be fo~.~.ed to interview these applicants as well as any further applicants and present a report at the next Council meeting. Carried Council Minutes ~ Pg. ~ Mayor Coco appointed Councilmen L. Miller, G. Mack and C. Miller to this committee. 2. ORDINANCE NO. 438 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA REGULATING THE CONSTRUCTION, ERECTION, ALTERATION, REPAIR AND MAINT- ENANCE OF ADVERTISING SIGNS AND THEIR SUPPORTS Consideration of extensive amendments to Ordinance No. 305 (Sign Ordinance). Said changes are substantive and include definitions and construction standards. Mr. Supinger presented the staff report on past studies and workshops held on this matter and stated that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this Ordinance. Hearing opened at 7:46 P.M. Mr. Fred Waitman~ Manager of the Tustin Chamber of Commerce stated that the Chardher is in favor of the majority of the changes but requests that this Ordinance be reviewed in six months. Robert Hall, 17452 Irvine Blvd. (Mr. Hall's statement is set forth verbdrum as requested by Mayor Coco) "I have artended several of the workshops and I think you did a lot of hard work on this and came a long ways. There are 2 areas I'm concerned about. I don't know if we can do any- thing about it here. As I said, this has been going on a long time. I wanted to make you aware of the~ One is - there is still the problem of allowable sign are~ ..... -:~,~,ercial areas for the store front or marquee sign, face sign or whatever you want to call it and the other area I wanted to discuss was the allowable area in the professional zone. We allow 2 sq. ft. per tenant, and this is just about right for doctors with the 4 in. letters. By the time you get through saying his name and his A. B. Gynecology, etc. you have used up your 2 sq. ft. I'm not asking or suggesting that we go wild, but on the other hand there are other types of firms allowed in the professional zones that require just a little more than that to say their name - especially if it is Prudential insurance IncorpoFated or something similar. In the eyes of the interest from these kinds of tenants, insurance companies, large engineering firms and so forth that have names like Voorheis Trindle and Nelson Inc., you just can't do it and end up with any kind of letter that you can sac from the street. I brought this out at other meetings and hearings, etc. and i don't .... it would be difficult to do something right here but, I wanted to make you aware of it. To attract the larger firms other than doctors, in the office building complex, we may need a little more thought in that one section. It may be that it can be handled in the Architectural Review Board, I don't know. If we have a problem it is possible that it may be appealed to your body° I wanted to state what I think is probably a problem in that area so that the Council would be aware of it at this time. Thank you." There being no further comments and no objections the hearing was declared closed a~ 7:48 P.M. Councilman Marsters questioned Section 5 on page 14, Nonconforming Existing Signs, and stated that after discussion with the Chamber Committee and other interested City officials it was the thought that the City would not go for full amortization of signs, but did want bring nonconforming signs under control within a reasonable length of time without undue hardship to the businessman~ ~gUnc~l~an Marsters thought that the word "substantial" should ~ inserted making the section read. "Axly e~ lawfully in existence on the ado~ie~ Of ~esul~ In a substan~ial ~eduction etc., or if the word "substantial~ is thought to be ambiguous, the Council might want to state a percentage. Council Minutes In answer to questioning, ~r. Supinger stated that if a non- conforming sign is voluntarily moved or replaced then'they would be required to comply with this Ordinance. Relative to questioning by .Councilman Marsters as to Section 3 - Feature Signs - it was explained that these signs are on a temporary basis with a time limit of 1 year with two 6-month extensions~ or special extension by the Planning Commission and will be on private property. Mayor Coco stated that Mr. Marsters' comment regarding Section 5 was a point well taken. The word "substantial" or "significant" would at least act as a guide to the Planning Commission or Development Preview Committee and concurred with reinstating the word "substantial." After further discussion on this section it was the consensus of ' the Council that the word ,substantial" should be inserted and Section 5 to read: Any sign lawfully in existence on the adoption of this Ordinance may be voluntarily modified or altered if such action will result in a substantial reduction in the degree of nonconformity and a building permit is secured therefor° Any sign lawfully in existence on the adoption of this Ordinance may be voluntarily moved or replaced, provided that upon such action, compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance will be required° Compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance will also be required when a change of use occurs. 9ouncilman Marsters questioned Section do - Roof Signs under Allowed Signs in Commercial and PC Districts - noting that there is no ---- maximum size set forth and he believed it to be critical that square footage be limited. Council discussed the amount of square footage which could be allowed under this section. The following suggestions were made: 1) 200 sq, fro maximum 2) 300 sqo ft. maximum 3) 200 sq. fro maximumwhich could with architectural approval be extended to 300 sq. ft. It was brought out that the Ordinance provided for moderate deviations by the Development Preview Committee and that one of their primary considerations will be proportion of size of sign to size of building. It was also noted that these signs will require a Use Permit so will be reviewedby 2 bodies° There being no objections, Mayor Coco directed that 300 sqo ft. maximum for the area of a roof sign be inserted in Section d, page 20 - Roof Signs - maximum size criteria. Moved by C. Miller~ seconded by Marsters that Ordinance No. 438, regulating the construction, erection, alteration, repair and maintenance of advertising signs and their supports, be read by _.__ ~itle only as modified~ Carried unanimously° 3. ZC 69-196 REZONING OF A PARCEL TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES FROM THE R-4 (SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO THE R-1 (SINGE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT. Site fronts approximately 660 ft. on the southwest side of Mitchell Avenue, ~pproximately 330 fro west of the centerline of Browning Avenue. Council Minutes 7/7/69 pg. 4 Mr. SuDinge~ presented staff report and recommendations of the planning Commission for approval. Hearing opened au 8:27 There being no objections or comments the hearing was declared closed at 8:28 P.M- Moved by C. Milter~ seconded by M~ck that ZC 69-196 be approved as recommended by the Planning CommissiOn and the City Attorney draft the necessary Ordinance. Carried. 4. V 69-248 - APPEAL OF DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL BY HAVEN AND JOHN BURKE (OWNER AMD MANAGER, HMS BRINY) OF THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING APPLICATION OF ROBERT HALL FOR A VARIANCE (V 69-248) TO PERMIT: a) A fish and chip take-out food establishment along with commercial offices. b) Reduction of the required off-street parking spaces for the above uses, (Zoning Ordinance requires 22 parking spaces, 21 parking spaces are proposed), Site fronts approximately 80 ft. on the north side of First Street and approximately 90 fro on the east side of Hall Circle (proposed). Site is also approximately 600' east of the centerline of prospect Avenue. Mro SupinSet. explained location, presented staff report stating that subject parcel was created by the conditional approval of Parcel Map PM-68-13 September 23, 1968. The parcel is approx- imately 80' X 140' and contains approximately 11,000 sq. fro Original intention was for a take-out fish and chips establish- ment and a beauty parlor. Offices were substituted for the beauty parlor to reduce possible parking conflicts and parking requirements. Plans have been revised to reduce office space so that parking complies with City requiremenzs and no longer necessitates a Variance° (Originally submitted plans would have required 22 parking spaces°) Hearing opened at 8:32 P.M. Mr. Robert Hall, applicant for V 69-248, stated he had nothing new to add but would be available for questioning. Mr. Hall also stated that he had not been aware of this appeal until late today. It was determined that this appeal had been noticed in the Tustin News but that apparently written nozices had not been sent to the original applicant or ~o the persons filing the appeal° Mro Rourke ruled that without due ~rritten notice this would not be a legal hearing andsthis hearing should be continued and individual notices sent. Moved ~y Mack~ seconded by C. Miller that this hearing be continued __ ~o the July 2ist meeting for further' noticing. Carried° 5. ZC 69-197 OF NANCY LaSHELLE AND ROBERT ASHWORTH TO CONSIDER REZONING OF A 1.25 ACRE PARCEL FROM R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO THE PC (PLANNED COIUNITY) DISTRICT TO PERMIT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PRE-SCHOOL AND PRIVATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Site fronts approximately 320 ft. on the west side of Yorba Street au the intersection of Yorba and Jacaranda Avenue, Council Minutes ~ ....... 7/7/69 Pgo 5 Mr. Supin~er explained the location, showed slides of proposed development and presented staff report and Planning Commission recommendation for approval° Mr. Supinger pointed out where Jacaranda comes into Yorba and stated that the applicant has agreed to move their driveways north so that there would not be confusion with the traffic movements. Hearing opened at 8:45 P.M. Mr. D. C. Hanson, 17332 Jacaranda (corner of Yorba), voiced his objections tO this zone change and use, stating that although the artist concept looks good it still leaves much to be desired. Due to this application he had placed his home up for sale. Hanson was concerned with the t~affic and maintenance of the grounds · and whether this is in keeping with the area. Mrs° Harry Wagner, 17331 Jacaranda, voiced her concern with the traffic problem, stating there is a problem at the nursery school now on Yorba just south of Irvine and an existing problem getting onto Yorba from Jacaranda. This may be a school but is a business. She had put her home up for sale and been informed by a real estate agent that property value had dropped because of this proposed use and she felt this to be a horrible use to bring into a purely residential neighborhood. Zoning should not be changed under any circumstances . Mr. Bud Ashworth, co-applicant, stated that prior to the Planning Commission meeting he had spoken to most of the effecued residents. He stated he could understand the feelings of the opposition. The existing school is in an inadequate facility with inadequate parking. This will be completely different. Have recently completed a similar facility in Orange on the Knoll Ranch which is considered the most beautiful in the United States. This proposed facility will not take away from the communit3f, the architecture is as nice as in Enderle Gardens, the parking is adequate, play areas are in the back of facility and screened by solid walt so that children will not be heard. .Mr. Ashworth said he believed this to be a good use forthis property and is one of the last remaining pieces of property they can afford. This is a business but not one that belongs in a commercial area. The Planning Commission unanimously approved. this application and he hoped the Council would feel the same. There being, no further objections or comments the hearing was declared closed at 8:55 P.M. In answer to questioming, Mr. Ashworth stated that he had spoken to about every resident of Enderle Gardens and was not aware of opposition until this meeting. The Home Owners Association had not opposed this 'application. The first phase is expected to have 114 children and approximately 25 in the second phase~ it is a possibility that they could eventually expand no the north if the property is still available in about three years. Mrs. Wagner stated that her real estate agent said he had a potential buyer who, when told what was proposed on this property, had backed out. She had more or less been told that either they take high rise apartments or the pre-school. She did not feel that the Council is in the position where they .would force a business in a residential area. Noise' is the least consideration as she is hoe at home anyway and the noise lwould not bother her. Mr. Supinger said he did not believe there was more than 2 acres left sou~h of the Taco stand and that it narrows to abou~ 60 ft. at the north end of the curve: on Yorba. Council Minutes 7/7/69 Pg. 6 In answer to questioning, Mr. Hanson said that Enderle Gardens is not sold out & there are quite a few undeveloped lots. Councilman Marsters stated that when he heard of this zone change he was concerned and a little appalled. He had not expected this type of development to go in here. In reviewing the renderings he felt that the applicant had done a good job and would develop it in good taste. It is a concern though to break the R-1 with this type of development and is something the Council should be concerned with. Mayor Coco asked if the Engineer's report relative to traffic'is thorough and complete° Mr. Supin~er stated he had discussed'with the City Engineer the problem of loading and unloading with the children° It was the feeling of the Engineer that this would not be c, problem as the entrance is inside the parking lot. It is a policy of the school that the child must be delivered physically to the teacher in the classroom and must be picked up in the classroom so it will not be convenient for a car to be parked out on Yorba Street° The City Engineer did indicate that the City has the authority to establish no parking zones the length of the property, although, he did feel there would not be a problem. Councilman C. Miller stated that it seemed to him that the basic issue is if the use is compatible with the zoning and uses in the area and will it be detrimental to the area property values° Miller said he believed this could be ~]..'~]oDed R-1 although not nearly as profitably, People on JacaraL .u; i~ other tracts in the area are perhaps going to have some prcolems with noise and traffic, etc, Homeowners deserve prime consideration, Moved by C. Miller~ seconded by Marsters that the Council no__t approve Zone Change 69-197.. Councilman Mack stated that in as much as his prime motivation in this situation is the lack of coordination ~¢ith type of uses here he felt this is not in keeping with the high quality homes directly to the east of this proposed use. He also said he is not convinced that this would be a safe use° Although the applicant has painted a pretty picture of this development and would no doubt do a fine job, hecould not be in favor of the projected use° Councilmen C. Miller stated he hated to hear anyone come before the Council and say they were given an either/or choice. He said he did not know wher~ this came from but hoped it is not the position of the City or any staff member in anFay. Councilmen Marsters and Mr. Gill both~voiced their concern on this subject and stated they would like to know where this statement originated° Mr. Gill said it had not been said by either he or Mr. Supinger. (It was later confirmed by Mrs° Wagner that this statement had not beenmade by any City official or any member of the City staff°) Mayor Coco made the following statement: "It would be the easiest thing in the world for me of course concur with all my colleagues here and have done with it as it is, but unfortunately I a m in the habit of saying what I feel. It's to my great peril once in awhile, but I'm sure I have to speak my conscience as you all have tonight. The subject of an either/or Situation has come ~p and of course has been denied by staff members as it should be, as well as by the Council. I have never been approached on it or spoken my opinion on it before tonight~ i do have concern about uses of ~his ~i~ t'~ mo~e ~o~e~8 than ~@~ i~ m~ ~ppe~ ~e~ ~ ~eple alen~ Yorba Street and in Enderl~ Gardens. I have seen, as the res'c of abe Council has~ the previous application for the apar~x~nu usage. This has been the ~" Council Minutes .... ~ ~. ,* ~L,'~: 7/7/69 Pg. 7 only application that has come close to economic reality, and of course the Council turned that down as being incompatible with the area and I fully concurred on it. I don't have enough vision or foresight to conceive of another Enderle Gardens on this particular property; although, I would like to see it, I'm aware of the difficulties that other residential developments have had in locating along freeways - in this some area as a matter of fact, It seriously concerns me that we might have a lesser use than this. Granted that this one is non fully compatible, is there a feasible use that would be more compatible? i don't know° As I say, I do not have the foresight to be able to conceive of one. So in that light it is difficult for me to go along with'the denial motion, judging fromwhat has come before us and what i can reasonably foresee in the future. Judging from the fact that no children will be allowed, again as I can see, in or near Yorba S'treet at anytime during the operation, the only traffic will be ingress and egress. Judging from the renderings the possibility of compatibility of the area, if not complete, being at least better than any that has come before us or that ! can see in the future, again it would be very difficult for me to go along with denial on this. This seems to be the best use to protect the value of the property." in answer to questioning Councilman Marsters stated that in his opinion, though not as a ~arLker, this property could be developed as R-1 subdivision, Since Mrs. Enderie owns the property to the north she could grant additional property to make it work out lot size. Councilman L. Miller questioned the possibility of moving this development further north to the Taco property. This would make it a block north of Enderle Gardens° If moved north with R-1 south, people with children would perhaps move in. Mayor Coco felt this would be compounding the problem. This land would then be more difficult to develop residential and the school would eventually expand south~ Mr~ Ashworth said it would not be economical to move north. The price on the property is more than they can afford. Based on the price they are paying for this property it is not feasible to develop as R-1 and they could not use the property on the north without the rest of the piece° Mr. Supinger stated that there is still some property just south of the Taco Pronto zonedC-2, then south of that is R-3, then R-1. Above motion to deny this zone change carried~ Ayes: Mack, C. Miller, Marsters, L. Miller~ Noes: Coco. Absent: None. Mayor Coco called a 7 minute recess. Meeting reconvened at 9:30 P.M. VII. OLD 1. ORDINANCE NO. 437 - 1st reading BUSINESS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, PREZONING PROPERTY ON APPLICATION NO. PZ 69-115 OF DUAYNE CHRISTENSON. Site fronts approximately 314 ft. on the northwest side of "B" Street, approximatel~ 30 ft. northeast of the centerline of McFadden Street. Moved by Mack, seconded by C. Miller that Ordinance Noo 437, prezoning property On Application No. PZ 69-115, be read by title only. Carried unanimously. "" Council Minutes 7/7/69 pg. 8 2o AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND JAMES GOODMAN RELATIVE TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN PZ 69-115. Moved by Mack~ seconded by Marsters that the agreement between the City and James Goodman be approved and the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute said agreemenzo Carried° 3. ORDINANCE N0. 439 - 1st reading AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE NO. 157, AS AMENDED, AND THE SIGN ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE NO. 305, AS AMENDED, TO PROVIDE FOR A DEVELOPMENT PREVIEW COMMITTEE. Moved by Marsters~ seconded by C. Miller that Ordinance Noo 439, providing for a Development Preview Committee, have first reading by title onlyo Carried unanimously. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 1008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING THE TUSTIN AREA WOMEN'S CLUB. Moved by C. Miller~ seconded by Mack that Resolution Noo 1008 be read by title only.o Carried unanimously° Moved by Mack, seconded by C. Miller. that Resolution No. 1008, commending the Tustin Area Women's Club, !e passed and adopted° Carried unanimously. Mayor Coco to present above Resolution to representatives of the Women's Club at the Band Concert and Tree Planting Ceremony July 9th. NEW 1. ORDINANCE N0. 440 - 1st reading BUSINESS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY CODE RELATIVE TO SUBDIVISION BONDS. Moved by C. MiIler~ seconded by Marsters that Ordinance No. 440, amending the City Code relative to subdivision bonds, have first reading by title only. Car, tied° Ayes: Coco, Mack, C. Marsters. Councilman L. Miller abstained. 2. ORDINANCE NO. 441 - 1st reading AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ABOLISHING THE STATE PURPOSE TAXFUND. Moved by Mack~ seconded by C. Miller that Ordinance Noo 44~, abolishing the State Purpose Tax Fund, have first reading by title only. Carried unanimously° 3o RESOLUTION NO. 1009 A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TUSTIN. Moved by Marsters~ seconded by Mack that Resolution Noo 1009 be read by .tit~e only. Carried unanimously° Moved ~y Mack~ seconded by C. }~ille~.that Resolution NR.o 1009~ a Resolution of intention zo approve an amendment to the contracE with the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, bepasse~and ado~tej~. Ca=tied unanimously. Council Minutes 7/7/69 Pgo 9 4. RESOLUTION NO. 1010 A RESOLUTION OF THE.CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ENDING THE CITY OF TUSTIN PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS, It was explained by Mro Gill that the majority of the proposed changes in the recentIy adopted Personnel Rules and Regulations were necessary due to the City's conversion to the City of Anaheim's computer payroll program, which will maintain pay~ sickleave and vacation records on a biweekly basis. Other changes are suggested to correct some inequities found in promotions, pay raises and vacationscheduleso Moved by Mack7 seconded by Marsters that Resolution Noo 1010 be Feed by title only. Carried unanimously. Moved by C. Miller~ seconded by Marsters that Resolution No. 1010, amending the City of Tustin Personnel Rules and Regulations, b__e passed and adopted. Carried unanimously. 5. FORMATION OF ONE YEAR JO!NT POWERS COMPUTER PLANNING AUTHORITY Moved by C. Miller~ seconded by Mack that the Mayor and City Clerk. be authorized and directed to sign the attached joint powers a~reement. Carried° .Councilman C. Miller stated that this is a significant step in the right direction between cities to solve mutual problems and he hoped to see more of ~oved by C. Miller~ seconded by Marsters that the City Clerk certify in writing the appointment of Gerald Co Mack, Mayor pro tem, as the City's official representative and Dan Blankenshio~ Assistant City Administrator, as the official alternate who shall carry out their responsibilities as provided under the agreement. Carried. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 1011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUST!N, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PLAN OF EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION° Moved by Mack~ seconded by C. Millet that Resolut{on Noo 1011 be read by title only. Carried unanimously° Moved by Mack7 seconded by M~rsters that Resolution Noo I011, adopting a plan of Employee Classification, ~e passed and adopted° Carried unanimously° 7. AWARD OF BID 0N HALF TON PICK-UP FOR PUBL!C WORKS DEPT. Moved by Marsters~ seconded by Mack that the bid of Dunton Ford, Santa Ana for the purchase of a one-half ton pick-up truck be awarded in the amount of approximately $~283.46 plus applicable taxes. Carried° 8. EXONERATION OF IMPROVEMENT BONDS TRACT 6275 Moved by C. Miller~ seconded by Mack that improvements in Tract 6275 be accpeted' and the pertinent bonds be exonerated. Carried. 9 · APPROVAL OF DEMANDS Moved by Mack~ seconded by C. Miller that demands be ppproved and paid in the amount of ~63~251o24. Carried. Council Minutes 7/7/69 pg. 10 OTHER 1. REMINDER OF TREE DEDICATION AND BAND CONCERT to be held BUSlESS Wednesday, July 9, at 7 P.M. in Centennial Park. 2. RESIGNATION OF LEN MILLER FROM PARKS AND RECREATION COmmISSION Moved by Mack~ seconded by Marstars that resignation of L. Miller from the Parks and Recreation Commission be accepted. Carried. Moved by C. Miller~ seconded by Mack that the City Attorney draft a Resolution comme~{~g Councilmen Let Miller for services on the Parks and Recreation Commission. Motion carried. L. Miller abstained. 3. UNIFORM INDUSTRIAL WASTE CHARGES. CounciLman C. Miller. reported on proposed Uniform industrial Waste Charges now being considered by the Couaty Sanitation Districts and the inequitable costs to the taxpayers when the volume or quality of the industrial wastes imposes an unreasonable burden on the district's facilities. Moved by Mack~ seconded by Marstars that the City go on record as being in favor of the proposed Uniform Industrial Waste Charge. Carried. 4. SPECIAL POLICE OFFICER Councilman Marsters stated that the need for a Special Police Officer was discussed at a budget session, He felt there would be available revenue for this and asked to have this studied and a report given to the Council. 5. VACANCIES ON PLANNING C0MMISSION AND PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION Mayor Coco requested the press to make these ~wo vacancies known to the public, Both vacancies are for City residents, THE FOLLOWING REPORTS AND CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED: 1. Building Department report for June 1969 - R. Waldo. 2. City Personnel Activity Roster. 3. City Travel Register. 4. Letter of appreciation from Tustin Fire Dept. Personnel. 5. Letter commending Public Works Dept. relative to tree replacement -P. Fo Rice. 6. Conservation of trees - P. F. Rice~ 7. Letter commending Officer Kovac and Sgu. Brown for services on County Training Program - W. J. Winslow, Marshal. 8. Letter commending Tustin Police Dept. relative to vacation checks - Cdr. W. H. Sweuson. 9o Letter commending Police Officer G. Moore - Mr. K. Bradford. 10. Expression of appreciation for support in matter of the Orange County Harbor District - City of Huntington Beach. 11. Resolution approving Dissolution of Harbor District - Local Agency Formation Commission. 12. Correspondence and by-laws - Orange County Criminal Justice Council. 13. Mobile X-Ray Committee Report - Orange County League of Cities. 14. Resolution re Emergency Fire Service - City of Seal Beach. 15. Governor's State House Conference on Children and Youth - Orange County White House Conference Coranitteeo 16. Legislative B~lletins - League of Catife~ni~ ~ities. Council Minutes 7/7/69 Pg. 11 ADJOURN- Moved by Mack~ seconded by Marsters that meetin~ beadiourned MENT Carried.