HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 02-21-89RE PO RTS
NO, 1
2-21-89
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 13, 1989
CALL TO ORDER-
7'00 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL'
Present: Weil, Baker, Le Jeune, Pontious, Shaheen
PUBLIC CONCERNS' {Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda}
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC 'ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION,)
1. Minutes of the January 23, 1989 Planning Commission Meeting
Commissioner Well moved, Pontious seconded to approve the consent calendar. Motion
carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. Use Permit 88-30
APPLICANT'
OWNER':
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENV I RONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
MS. SUSAN RIDDLE AND MS. JUDY BUDZENSKI
C/O INCHES AWAY
18302 IRVINE BLVD. #110
TUSTIN, CA 92680
CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
13891 NEWPORT AVENUE
TUSTIN, CA 92680
13721 NEWPORT AVENUE #15 IN TUSTIN PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER
PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS 1
AUTHORIZATION TO LOCATE AND OPERATE A FITNESS PARLOR/HEALTH CLUB
IN A PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL'DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Use
Permit 88-30 by adopting Resolution No. 2564, subject to the conditions
contained therein.
Presentation' Bernard Chase, Planner
Planning Commission Acrid,, Agenda
February 13, 1989
Page two
Commissioner Shaheen moved, Well seconded.to approve Use Permit 88-30 by the adoption
Of Resolution No. 2564 as submitted. Motion* carried:5-O.
..
3. Use Permit 89-01
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
DR. JEFFREY GOMES
13042 MARSHALL LANE
TUSTIN, CA 92680
GEORGE A. BROOMELL
5250 WEST CENTURY BLVD. #307
LOS ANGELES, CA 90045
17331 EAST SEVENTEENTH STREET (FRENCH QUARTER SHOPPING CENTER)
COMMERICAL GENERAL
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 1)
TO AUTHORIZE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A 1,656 SQUARE FOOT VETERINARY
CLINIC IN A TENANT SPACE WITHIN AN EXISTING RETAIL CENTER.
Presentation: Eric Haaland, Assistant Planner
Application for Use Permit 89-01 has been withdrawn, no Planning Commission action
necessary.
OLD BUSINESS.
4~. Code Enforcement Activitx
Presentation: Jack Light, Planning Technician
Received and filed.
NEW BUSINESS
5. DESIGN REVIEW 88-53
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING'
ENV I RONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
THE IRVINE COMPANY
550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE
P. O. BOX I
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658-8904
SAME
TUSTIN RANCH GOLF COURSE; LOTS 29 AND 30 OF TRACT 12870
'EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN - GOLF COURSE
IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
85-2, FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN, PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED ON
MARCH 17, 1986 WITH ADOPTED SUPPLEMENTS AND ADDENDUMS, ADEQUATELY
ADDRESSES ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
PROPOSED PROJECT AND NO ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
WILL BE PREPARED
APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A CLUBHOUSE, DRIVING RANGE, MAINTENANCE
BUILDINGS, BATHROOMS PARKING LOT AND. OTHER RELATED 'FACILITIES FOR
THE TUSTIN RANCH GOLF COURSE
Planning Commission Acrid,, Agenda
February 13, 1989
Page three
RECOMMENDATION
1.- -It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve the Environmental
Determination for the project by adopting Resolution No. 2562, as submitted
or revised.
2. It is recommended that the Planning Commission either continue the matter
to permit the applicant to submit revised plans or elevations addressing
any remaining design concerns of the Commission or approve Design Review
88-53' by adoption of Resolution No. 2561, subject to the conditions as
submitted or revised.
Presentation' Steve Rubin, Senior Planner
Commissioner Well moved, Pontious seconded to approve the Environmental Determination
for the project by the adoption of Resolution No. 2562 with the following revisions:
In title line 4 delete 'WITH THE ADDENDUM ADOPTED ON FEBRUARY 1, 1988" and replace
with "AS MODIFIED BY SUBSEQUENTLY ADOPTED SUPPLEMENTS AND ADDEIIDA" Motion carried
5-0.
Commissioner Pontious moved, Le Jeune seconded to approve Design Review 88-53 by
adoption of Resolution No. 2561 subject to revised conditions as follows:
· Title - line 5 - after "RESTROOMS" insert ", ENTRY BRIDGE, ENTRY WALLS, SIGNAGE";
Item I. A., line 2, Replace "14,280' with "18,038"; Item I. A., line 6, after
'l°tj
TM add "entry bridge, entry walls, signage"
Page 2 II. line 2, replace "14,280' with '18,038" and at the end of line 5 add ',
entry bridge, entry walls, signage';
Exhibit A, Page..1, Delete top line "RESIDENTIAL BUILDER MAPS"; Item 1.1 - line 2,
after ")~g88" add "and subsequently approved revisions"; Item 2.1 C. place parenthesis
around "consistent with .the site plan and landscaping plans"; ~, Item F. 3. add
"or' as otherwise permitted to be classified as determined by the Building Official
and Fire Department pursuant to the respective building and fire codes.";
Page 3, change the following items to read as follows: Item C. "Utilize a hand
troweled stucco finish or alternative stucco application/texture as reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Department." Item O. "Reduce metal roof
spire dimensions to 4 inches." Item E. "The conveyor for loading golf balls into
the roof top storage area shall be internalized or made' removable so as not to be
visible from outside the building when not in use." Item F. "Revise the exterior
stucco paint color from white to a darker off-white hue or more muted tone subject to
future approval of any proposed color by the Planning Commission." Item H line 1,
change "wood beams" to "wood-clad beams"; Delete Item I and re-letter the remainder
of 2.1; New Item I, line 2, after comma should read "five foot wide by 3 foot high
window"; Item K, line 4 after "parking lot' add 'on the east elevation";
Page four, Item 0., line 2 delete "textures" and end sentence after "clubhouse" in
line 3, eliminating the remainder of Item O; Item 3.2 line 2, change "Director of
the Community Development Department" to "Planning Commission" and on line 3 change
"noted" to "notes'; Item 3.3 line 1, change "chain linked" to "security"; Item 3.4,
Planning Commission Action Agenda
February 13, 1989
Page four
line 2 after "The screen shall be" add "landscaping treatment or" and at the end of
the second sentence add "as approved by the Community Development Department"; Item
3.5 at the end, add "unless otherwise approved by the Community Develop.ment
Oep----artment";
Page 5, Item 4.2 A. should be changed to read "A combination of planting materials
must be u~ed"'; Delete Item B. and re-letter the remainder of 4.2; Item F. line 2,
~eplace "on plan check drawings." wi th "as appropriate and consistent wi th
applicant's recommended landscaping/hardscape concept for the project. ";
Page six, Item K, eliminate the last two sentences; Item 4.4, line 3 after "used"
replace with "tO reinforce pedestrian circulation through the parking lot."
Page seven, Change numbering 4.9 should be 4.6 and 4.10 should be 4.7; Item 4,6
delete first paragraph and add the following: The project sign program shall be
revised as follows: A. A maximum of one freestanding 32 square foot monument sign
shall be permitted at the project entry pursuant to Section 9394 (a) of the Tustin
City Code.; B. Incorporate treatment on the entry sign to make it compatible with
the clubhouse.; C. Sandblasted wood directional signs shall be stained to match
wood elements of clubhouse, or other alternative color or texture consistent with
the main building treatment, recommended by the applicant, subject to approval of
the Community Development Department. O.~ Provide a plan showing the location of
all directional signs.; Change 4.7 to read as follows: 4.7. Lights to be installed
on buildings shall be of a decorative design. Lights shall be designed to reduce
glare and negative impacts on adjoining properties. The location and types of
exterior mounted building lighting shall be subject to the approval of the Department
of Community Development.; Delete Item 4.8 (previously 4.11).
6. Or_ange County Hazardous Waste ManaQement Plan
Presentation'' Laura Cay Kuhn, Senior Planner
Received and filed.
STAFF CONCERNS
7. Report of Actions Taken at the February 6, 1989 City Council Meetinq
Presentation' Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development
An Action Agenda was unavailable at meeting time.
Planning Commission Actiu,, Agenda
February 13, 1989
Page~ fi ve
CO~RI SSION CONCERNS
Commissioner Shaheen indicated that he would like to have a closer liaison beb~een
the City Council and the Planning Commission' and also requested joint workshops to
enable the agencies to maintain uniform concepts.
Commissioner Weil noted that the area of E1 Camtno Real south' of Red Hill is looking
very tacky and wondered if that area was going to be utilized in the freeway
widening.
Commissioner Baker inquired about the aircraft noise recently at the ;aarine Base and
over the golf course and asked where the Browning Corridor is actually located.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:20 p.m. the Planning Commission recessed to the Board of Appeals. At 7:33 p.m.
the Planning Commission meeting reconvened. At 10:40 p.m. Commissioner Le Jeune
moved, Pontious seconded to adjourn to a Workshop on the Orange County Hazardous
Materials Plan at 5:00 p.m. on February 27, 1989 in the City Council Chambers. The
Workshop will adjourn to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
February 27, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. Motion carried 5-0.
CALL TO ORDER~
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
NEW BUSINESS
ACTION AGENDA
TUSTIN BOARD OF APPEALS
SPECIAL CALLED MEETING
FEBRUARY 13, 1989
7:21 p.m.
Present: Well, Baker, Le Jeune, Pontious, Shaheen
le
APPLICANT:
Board of Appeals 88-01
C/O JENNINGS PIERCE
IRVINE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
P.O. BOX I
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8904
LOCATION:~ LOT 29, TRACT 12870 - TUSTIN RANCH GOLF COURSE
REQUEST: INTERPRETATION ON SECTION 320 OF THE UNIFORM SWIMMING POOL, SPA
AND HOT TUB CODE.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Board of Appeals approve the
applicants request to not classify golf course lakes as being regulated by
Section 320 of the Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code.
Presentation: Lloyd Dick, iBuilding Official
Commissioner Well moved, Pontious seconded to approve Appeal 88-01 determining that
bodies of water on the golf course site are not.regulated by Section 320 of the
Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code and that the subject bodies of water must
be posted with "No Swimming" signs and signs indicating that the water is unsafe for
drinking. Motion carried 5-0.
OLD BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
At 7'32 p.m. the Board of Appeals adjourned to the next special called Board of
Appeal s Meeting.