Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 03-20-89MINUTES OF A REG~LARMEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ~ CITY OF TU~TI~t CALIFOR~IA MA~CH 20t 1989 I, II. III · Xe C~J~L TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kennedy at 7:02 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Prescott. INVOCATION The Invocation was given by Richard Mathison, Pastor of Red Hill Lutheran Church. ROLL CALL Council Present: · Council Absent: Others Present: Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Richard B. Edgar, Mayor Pro Tem Ronald B. Hoesterey John Kelly Earl J. Prescott None William A. Huston, City Manager -Lois Jeffrey, Deputy City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Christine Shingleton, Dir./Community Development Fred Wakefield, Acting Chief of Police Rober~ Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Royleen White, Dir./Community & Admin. Services Steve Foster, Police Captain Laura Kuhn, Senior Planner Berrie Correa, Personnel Assistant Valerie Whiteman, Deputy City Clerk Approximately 90 in the audience NEW BUSINESS (AGENDA ORDER) 1. RESOLUTION NO. 89-43/TUSTIN MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION 2. RESOLUTION NO. 89-42/TUSTIN POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Mayor Kennedy requested this item be taken out of agenda order and, at 7:06 p.m., announced the City Council would recess to Closed Session to meet with its designated representatives regarding labor relation matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. The meeting reconvened at 7:26 p.m. The following employees and members of the community spoke in opposition to Resolution Nos. 89-42 and 89-43: Robert LaBarge, P.O.' Box 1516, Tustin Terrie Richardson, 131 Hall Circle #46, Tustin Patrick Welch, 18342 Rainer Drive, Santa Ana John Adams (consultant, representing'both Associations) Carole Bryant, 15500 Tustin Village Way #100, Tustin Jim Ports, 2161 Marselina, Tustin At 8:30 p.m., Mayor Kennedy announced the City Council would again recess to Closed Session to meet with its designated. representatives regarding labor relation matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. The meeting reconvened at 8:55 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem ~dgar believed the Police Officers and City employees were the best possible and he was very proud of them. He had seeh all data relating to negotiations and believed the offer Qas fair and competitive with other cities. It was moved by Edqar, seconded by Kelly, to adopt the following Resolutions No. 89-43 and 89-42: CITY COUNCIL MINUTE' Page 2, 3-20-89 IV. RESOLUTION NO. 89-43 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING AN IMPASSE IN NEGOTIATIONS WITH THETUSTINMUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AND IMPLEMENTING MODIFICATIONS FOR EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY THE'TUSTIN MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION RESOLUTION NO. 89-42 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING AN'IMPASSE IN NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE TUSTIN POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION AND' IMPLEMENTING MODIFICATIONS FOR EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY THE TUSTIN POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Councilman Prescott said no contract was better than a forced contract and wanted Council to have face-to-face negotiations with the employees. He felt a forced contract would permanently damage good relations with City employees. Councilman Kelly did not feel the contract was being forced upon the employees and the City's offer was very fair~ Mayor Kennedy requested, as amendments to Reso%utions No. 89-43 and 89-42, maker and second agreeable, that'the Resolutions be effective March 24, 1989, at 5:00 p.m., and until that time, the Council's 27-month contract offer be open for acceptance by the employees. Mayor Kennedy stated the impasse had been a communication failure for both sides. The Council had to not only provide for the .employees but provide services to the community and could not be intimidated or politically threatened by employees, as she personally had been. She said that management and employees were not treated equally; management did receive additional compensation commensurate with their tremendous responsibilities. She was grateful for the employee's professionalism'during .the negotiation process' and the Council'had 'worked extremely hard to increase wages and benefits for empioyees, bringing them from the bottom of Orange County,s pay scale to the median. Councilman Hoesterey commented that the City and Associations had the right to disagree but could'not let personal differences prevent them from performing their jobs. He felt a contract that offered a higher percentage wage increase was a better option than a forced contract with a lesser percentage. He noted that, in his years.as a. Councilmember, this had been the most painful negotiation experience. The motion carried 4-], Prescott opposed. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. AMENDMENTS TO TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATED TO GRADING AND EXCAVATION Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, reported that the Planning Commission had recommended to the Council amendments to the Tustin City Code relating to Grading and Excavation. Staff had worked on the Ordinance for approximately 20 months and the amendments ultimately would be accompanied by a Grading Manual. She emphasized that the proposed Ordinance would not only apply to East Tustin areas but the entire City and, if applicable in the future, could apply to areas within the City's sphere of influence such as the hillside areas of North Tustin. The Public Hearing was opened at 9:10 p.m. Brad Olson, representing the Irvine Company, said the following sentence contained on page 12 under Hillside Review of Ordinance No. 1018, paragraph "n" was ambiguous: "Every permit shall also be conditioned upon the applicant and/or owner's warranty of all slopes through applicants and/or owner implementation of a slope warranty program subject to approval and review by the City Attorney and Planning Commission.,, His preference was to have the language deleted or restate the language to eliminate confusion. CITY COUNCIL MINUT~.S Page 3, 3-20-89 Christine Shingletpn responded regarding the background and justification of a slope warranty program. Council/staff discussion followed regarding the concept, definition and implementation of a slope warranty program. There were no other speakers on the matter and the Public Hearing was closed at 9:25 p.m. Councilman Prescott thought a slope' warranty program was imperative but understood how the open-ended language in paragraph "n" would concern a business owner. He suggested the Ordinance be returned to ~he Planning Commission for development of specific language. Mayor Kennedy clarified that this Ordinance would only set policy for grading and the specific language would be developed later when the Council and Planning Commission review each development. The Grading Manual would provide intricate details. Christine Shingleton commented that staff could modify the language indicating that the actual program would be returned to Council for review. She noted that if introduction of the Ordinance did not occur at this Council meeting, the Planning Commission's action on Tustin Ranch Phase 4 tract map would be delayed. Councilman Hoesterey suggested that Council proceed with action .on the Ordinance and incorporate language of ratification by the Planning Commission and waiver of fees for appeal to the City Council should there be a disagreement. He understood the Irvine Company's concern of an open-ended liability, but felt it would not be difficult to implement a solution. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kelly, that Ordinance No. 1018 have first reading by title'only~and the final ordinance to include language "subject to appeal to the City Council". Councilman Kelly suggested contacting the City of Orange'who'had' recently been involved in a grading liability lawsuit. Mayor Kennedy understood the concerns of the Irvine Company but her major concern was the protection of the City's liability and future slope developments. The motion carried 5-0. Following 'first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1018 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, tha~ Ordinance No. 1018 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1018 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE TO ADOPT PROVISIONS RELATING TO GRADING AND EXCAVATION The motion carried 5-0. 81 ORANGE COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) Laura Kuhn, Senior Planner, gave a background report on the Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Karen Peters, Manager of the Hazardous Materials Program for the Orange County Fire Department, reviewed the contents and process of the Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Mayor Kennedy opened the Public Hearing at 9i40 p.m. There were no speakers on this subject and the Public Hearing was closed. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve the following: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 3-20-89 V® VI. 1. Certify the proposed EIR as adequate to serve as a program EIR for the consideration of the Orange County Hazardous Waste Management Plan by adoption of the following Resolution No 89-40: . ' RESOLUTION NO. 89-40 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE ORANGE COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN IS ADEQUATE-TO SERVE AS THE PROGRAM EIR AND FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. .2. ApproVe the Orange County Hazardous Waste Management Plan by adoption of the following Resolution No. 89-41: RESOLUTION NO. 89-41 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTI. N, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF ORANGE COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN The motion carried ~-0- 81 PUBLIC INPUT 1. DIAMOND LANES Carole Bryant, 15500 Tustin Village Way #100, Tustin, requested Council's assistance in arranging a meeting with Caltrans to .ascertain why a diamond lane flyover was needed and she questioned Mayor Pro Tem Edgar regarding raw data information from O.C.T.C. · Mayor Kennedy suggested that she write a formal letter requesting the raw data from O.C.T.C. as a private citizen. The Council would be unable to comply with her req.~ests. PROPERTY AT 195 E. HAIN STREET .. John Zahn, Star'Rt. '#1121, Orange, spoke regarding property he was renting at 195 E'. Main Street, Tustin, and the problems that had occurred with building improvements and his business license. Mayor Kennedy asked him to meet with staff to resolve the problems and if unsuccessful in his efforts the matter would be agendized. ANNEXED CITY AREAS WITH SANTA ANA ADDRESSES/ZIp CODES Gerald Feldman, 13191 Wickshire Lane, Tustin, representing the Bellewick Community Association, informed Council that his area of residence, which was annexed into the City approximately two years ago, was still receiving mail through a Santa Aha address and zip code. He cited several problems with receipt of mail and requested Council agendize the Tustin address/zip code dilemma. Following Council discussion on the history of the situation, Council concurred to have pertinent data compiled and agendize at the April 3, 1989 Council meeting. CONSENT CALENDAR It was Moved bY Hoestere¥, seconded by Edgar, to approQe the Consent Calendar. The' motion car~gd'5-0. 1. APPROVED MINUTES - MARCH 6, 1989, REGULAR MEETING 2. APPROVED DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2~626,323.73 RATIFIED PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF %198,618.21 50 · 3. RESOLUTION NO. 89-44 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS ON REBECCA LANE, GWEN AVENUE, LUCINDA WAY AND DEBORAH DRIVE AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 3-20-89 Adopted Resolution No. 89-44 approving the plans and specifications for the subject project and authorizing advertisement for bids. 86~ 4. A~SESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2, CONTRACT FOR GAS LINE EXTENSION Approved the Southern California Gas Company Contract No. 29.1155/T-54035 in the.amount of $87,224.58 a~d authorized the Mayor to execute subject, contract',' 5. BAUER VS. CITY OF TUSTIN Approved the sum of $10,000.00 in' full settlement of this action against the City of Tustin. 40 VII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None VIII. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION 1. SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TOWN CENTER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA - ORDINANCE NO. 1021 It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded bY Edgar, that Ordinance No. 1021 have second reading by title only. The motion carried 4-0, Prescott abstained. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1021 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterev. seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 1021 be passed and adopted as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1021 -AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY .OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TUSTIN TOWN CENTER AREA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT The motion carried '4-0, Prescott abstained. (Roll call vote) Mayor Kennedy requested staff agendize the blanket Certificates of Compliance'previously discussed. 60 2. AUDIT COMMITTEE - ORDINANCE NO. 1022 It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 1022 have second reading by title only. The motion carried $-0. Following'second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1022 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edqar, that Ordinance No. 1022 be passed and adopted as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1022 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH THE AUDIT COMMITTEE Council discussion followed regarding the 4-year length of term for committee, members. William Huston, City Manager, suggested that Council determine the length of term by specific committee members. Councilman Hoesterey proposed that the current members of the Audit Committee remain in their terms as previously assigned. Council concurred. IX. Mayor Kennedy commented on Evelyn Feldman's resignation from the Audit Committee and requested agendizing appointment of her replacement at the April 3, 1989 Council meeting. .The motion carried 5-0. (Roll call vote) 27 .OLD BUSINESS 1. AIRPORT STATUS REPORT - JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE MONITORING PROGRAM' (JWA), COALITION FOR A RESPONSIBLE AIRPORT SOLUTION (CRAS), AIRPORT SITE COALITION (ASC) AND HELICOPTEROVERFLIGHT PROGRAM TASK FORCE (HOPTF) christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, suggested the CRAS slide presentation on the E1 Toro commercial CITY COUNCIL MINUTE' Page 6, 3-2'0-89 x~ ai~or~ location be scheduled for the April 3, 1989 Council meeting. Council concurred. It was moved by Hoesterev, se~0ndpd by Kenne4¥, to receive and. file subject report. The motion cart%ed 4~O, Edgar absent. 101 2. TERMS OF PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION It was moved by Hoesterev. seconded by Kennedy, that the terms of the Parks and Recreation Commissioners remain in accordance with the lots that were drawn on November 10~ 198~. The m~tio~ carried 4-0, Edgar absent. 76 NEW BUSINESS 1. RESOLUTION NO. 89-43/TUSTIN MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION Please see Page 1 of these Minutes. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 89-42/TUSTIN POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Please see Page 1 of these Minutes. 3. AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT REPORT Mayor Kennedy gave a brief report on the passage of the Air Quality Management Plan. · Councilman Prescott asked that the record reflect his opposition to the Air Quality Management Plan. No actio~ was taken by the Council. 81 · 4. REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE OF WARNER AVENUE BETWEEN PULLHAN STREET AND WRIGHT STREET Bob Ledendecker~ Director of Public Works, reported that staff had reviewed this project over a 2 to 3 month period. After completion of traffic counts, it was determined that the impact of the closure would not be as difficult on the community as was originally thought and a Caltrans poll of businesses directly impacted revealed three in favor of the Closure, one opposed. Council/staff discussion followed regarding increased traffic in surrounding area' due'to the closure. Mayor Pro Tem Edgar voiced his support of Caltrans, request and wanted another condition added to the recommendation. To insure completion of the project in the estimated time, he requested the establishment of timelines for each phase of the project be coordinated with staff, submittal of progress reports, and copies of those reports to Council. Council/staff discussion followed regarding the possibility of a contractual agreement.with Caltrans and communication meetings with the affected utility 'companies to safeguard the timely comple~ion of this project. · It was moved by Edqar, seconded by Kennedy, to authorize (1) the closure of Warner Avenue between Pullman Street and Wright Street for a maximum period of seven months subject to adequate detour signing/notification and the concurrenc~ Of the City of Santa Aha, (2) the establishment of phase timelines with submittal of progress reports, and (3) staff to investigate the possibility of a contractual agreement with Caltrans. ' Richard' Vining, 400 W. Main Street, Tustin, voiced his concerns with the flow of traffic on area surface streets due to the relocation of.the McFadden off-ramp.. He cautioned CounciI that Caltrans' main concern was the freeway and'not the traffic impact on surrounding streets. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 3-20-89 Council/staff discussion followed regarding similar projects within the community and -mitigating measures that will be coordinated'between staff and Caltrans. The motion carried 5-0. 86 s. MXD-Y~ BUDGET aZVXEW ' · . · . .. · Mayor. Pro Tam Edgar felt construction on the Jamboree Road extension through· the Marine Base should commence as soon as possible and questioned when the project would be advertised for bid. Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, responded that due to the funding ~ou~ce desired by the City of Irvine and the delay in receiving plan approval from the Environmental Management Agency, the anticipated date for beginning the bid process would be approximately July 1, 1989. Mayor Pro Tem Edgar questioned the amount of savings earned through Assessment Districts 85-1 and 86-2. Bob Ledendecker responded that the figures reflected in the budget may be misleading because the majority of the projects in those Assessment Districts were not 100% completed. Mayor Pro Tem Edgar requested staff to provide a year-end report using the Mid-Year Budget Report format no later than Labor Day. .~0uncil concurred. It was ~oved by Hoestere¥, seconded by. Sdqar, to approve the following: 1. One million dollars be transferred from the 1988-89 General Fund reserve to the Capital Improvements Fund for the Jamboree Road extension project (Edinger to'-Barranca); 2. $373,000.00 dollars be transferred from the 1988-89 General Fund reserve to the Park Developmen~ Fund for future City parks located in Tustin Ranch; 3. The mid-year budget review be received and filed. The motion carried 5-0. 5O XI. REPORTS 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - MARCH 13, 1989 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edqar, to ratify the Planning Commission Action Agenda of March 13, 1989. The motion carried 5-0. 80 2. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 1989 It was moved by Hoestere¥~ seconded by Edqar, to receive and file subject report. The motion carried 4-1, Prescott opposed. 50 3. DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS VEHICLES AND WORK EQUIPMENT It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file subject report. The motion carried 5-0. 86 XII. PUBLIC INPUT - None (Mayor Kennedy informed members of the press that the City would have information available to them the following morning on the figures used during the negotiation process.) XIII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. DEBRIS ON VANDENBERG LANE, WEST OF pROSPECT AVENUE Mayor Pro Tem Edgar reported the area on Vandenberg, west of CITY COUNCIL MINu%_ Page 8, 3-20-89 Prospect, was still littered with shelves, boards, etc. and required staff attention. 2.' SEMIAAUTOMATICS AS ANOPTION~LPRIMARYW~APON FOR POLICE OFFICERS · It was moved by Prescott. seconded by Kelly, to agendize, at the April 3, 1989 Council meeting, the use of semi-automatics as an optional primary weapon for the Police Department The motion carrie~ $-0. ' 3. PUBLIC INPUT ON CI~C CENTER RENOVATION Councilman Prescott voiced his suppor~ of a citizen forum to discuss the City Hall renovation. William Huston, City Manager, responded that st~ff had planned to schedule a workshop the latter part of April on the Civic Center improvements which would include a presentation by the architect. The workshop would be noticed and open to the public. Staff will agendize, at the April 3, 1989 Council meeting, the setting of the workshop date. ' 4. PRESCOTT'S ABSTENTION VOTE ON RESOLUTION NO. 89-15 Councilman Prescott wanted these Minutes to reflect that at the .Council meeting of February 21, 1989, he inadvertently neglected to abstain on Consent Calendar Item No. 4, Resolution 89-15.. 5. ADJouRNMENT IN MEMORY OF TUSTINMARINES Councilman Prescott requested the meeting be adjourned in memory of the Tustin Marines who died in a-recent helicopter crash in Korea. $. VERNAL EQUINOX Councilman Prescot~ said the vernal equinox 'had occurred that morning at 7:29 a.m. and he had photographed twenty-eight eggs standing on end. 7. PROCEDURE FOR AGENDIZING SUBJECTS AT COUNCILMEMBER,S REQUEST Councilman Hoesterey requested agendizing a Resolution to formalize the process when a Councilmember desired to have an item placed on the agenda. 8. PURCHASE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO TAPES It was moved by Prescott, seconded b9 Edgar, to purchase video  pes of City Council meetings from American Cable Systems at 0.00 per tape. The motion carried 5-0. 9. CITY PARTICIPATION IN ORANGE COUNTY'S 100TH BIRTHDAY CELEBRATION Mayor Kennedy said Angel Stadium had requested the City participate, on July 5, 1989, in Orange County's 100th birthday celebration with an entry such as a band, float, or celebrity. Council concurred to solicit participation from the school district, Marine Base, or other community organizations· 10. TRAFFIC STUDY AT FARMINGTON ROAD AND BRYAN AVENUE Mayor Kennedy said she had been contacted by a resident who was concerned with traffic problems at Farmington and Bryan. - Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, responded that the area'was scheduled for a traffic study. CITY COUNCILMINUTE$ Page 9, 3-20~89 XIV. ADJOURNMENT At 10:50 p.m., the meeting recessed to the Redevelopment Agency and then adjourned in . memory of the Tustin Marines to a Capital Improvement Budget Workshop on Monday, April 3, 1989, at 5:00 p.m. and then to the next Regular Meeting on Monday, April 3, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. . MAYOR MINUTES OF A REGULAR HEETINC -. OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ T~E CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA. ~%/~C~ 20~ 1989 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Kennedy at 10:50 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. ROLL CALL Members Present: Ursula E. Kennedy, Chairperson Richard B. Edgar, Chairperson Pro Tem Ronald B. Hoesterey John Kelly Earl J. Prescott Me~bers Absent: None Others. Present: William A. Huston, Executive Director/City Manager Lois Jeffrey, Deputy City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Christine Shingleton, Director/Comm. Development Fred Wakefield, Acting Chief of Police Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Royleen White, Director/Community & Adm. Services Steve Foster, Police Captain Laura Kuhn, Senior Planner Bettie Correa, Personnel Assistant Valerie Whiteman, Deputy City Clerk Approximately 20 in the audience 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 6, 1989, REGULAR MEETING It was moved by Kelly, seconded by Edqa~, to approve the Minutes of March 6, 1989. The motion carried $-Q. 4. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $83t288.14 It was moved by Kelly, seconded by Edqar, to approve subject demands in the amount of $83,288.14. The motion carried 5-0. 60 5. DESIGN REVIEW 88-20 It was moved by Prescott, seconded by Kelly, to approve the following: 1. Adopt the following Resolution No. RDA 89-9, certifying the Final Negative Declaration as adequate for the project: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 89-~ - A RESOLUTION OF THE COM/4UNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY .OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CASIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE FOR DESIGN REVIEW 88-20, INCLUDING REQUIRED FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT 2. Approve Design Review 88-20 by adoption of the following Resolution No. RDA 89-10, Subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit "A" of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2575: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 89-10. - A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY BEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF'THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 88-20 AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO AND ONE HALF STORY, ELEVEN UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT AT 15642 PASADENA AVENUE Mayor Pro Tem Edgar noted that the zoning for this project was R-3 (1750} and questioned if that high of a density could be discouraged in underdeveloped areas. Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development,' responded that a City-wide land use inventory would be completed in REDEVELOPMENT ~' ~NCY MINUTES Page 2, 3-20-8~. conjunction with the General Plan revision program at which time Council could impart policy direction. The motion carried 7-0. 60 OTHER BUSINESS - None ADJO~NT At-10:54 p.m., the meeting adjourned to the next Regular Meetingon Monday, April 3, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. CHAIRPERSON