HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 04-03-89HTNUTES OF A REGUL3~ MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
~TY OF TUST'rN~ CALTFORN~.
,MZLR~ 20 · 2,989
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kennedy at 7:02 p.m, in the -
City Council .Chambers, 300 .Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance
was led by Councilman Prescott.
INVOCATION
The Invocation-was given 'by Richard Mathison, Pastor of Red Hill
Lutheran Church. '- .
council Present:
Council Absent:
Others Present:
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor
Richard B. Edgar, Mayor'Pro Tem
Ronald B. Hoesterey
John Kelly
Earl J. Prescott
None
.William A. Huston, City Manager
Lois Jeffrey, Deputy City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Christine Shingleton, Dir./Community Development
Fred Wakefield, Acting Chief of Police
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Royleen White, Dir./Community & Admin. Services
Steve Foster, Police Captain
Laura Kuhn, Senior Planner
Berrie Correa, Personnel Assistant
Valerie-Whiteman, Deputy C£ty Clerk
Approximately 90 in .the audience
NEW BUSINESS (AGENDA ORDER)
1. RESOLUTION NO. 89-43/TUSTIN :MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
2. RESOLUTION NO. 89-42/TUSTIN POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
Mayor Kennedy req~/ested this item be taken out of agenda order
and, at 7:06 p.m., announced the City Council would recess to
Closed Session to meet with its designated representatives
regarding labor relation matters pursuant to Government Code
Section 54957.6.
The meeting reconvened at 7:26 p.m.
The following employees and members of the community spoke in
opposition to Resolution Nos. 89-42 and 89-43:
Robert LaBarge, P.O. Box 1516, Tustin
Terrie Richardson, 131 Hall Circle #46, Tustin
Patrick Welch, 18342 Rainer Drive, Santa Aha
John Adams (consultant, representing both Associations)
Carole Bryant; 15500 Tustin Village Way #100, Tustin
Jim Ports, 2161 Marselina, Tustin
At 8:30 p.m., 'Mayor Kennedy announced the City Council would
again recess to Closed Session to meet with its designated
representatives regarding labor relation matters pursuant to
Government Code Section 54957.6.
The meeting reconvened at 8:55 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar believed the Police Officers and City
employees were the best possible and he was very proud 'of them.
He had seen all data relating, to negotiations and believed the
offer"was fair and competitive with other cities.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, to adopt the following
Resolutions No. 89-43 and 89-42:
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 3-20-89
IV.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-43 - A RESOI~JTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING AN IMPASSE IN NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE TUSTIN MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AND IMPLEMENTING
MODIFICATIONS FOR EMPLOYEES-REPRESENTED BY THE TUSTIN MUNICIPAL
EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
RESOLUTION NO. '89-42 - A RESOLUTION OF'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING AN IMPASSE IN NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE TUSTIN POLICE OFFI .CERS ASSOCIATION. AND IMPLEMENTING
MODIFICATIONS FOR EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY THE TUSTIN POLICE
OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
Councilman Prescott. said no contract was better than a forced
contract and wanted Council to. have face-to-face negotiations
with the employees. He felt a forced contract'-would permanently
damage good relations with City employees.
Councilman Kelly did not feel the contract was bei-ng forced upon -
the employees and the City's offer was very fair.
Mayor Kennedy requested, as amendments to Resolutions No. 89-43
and 89-4'~, maker and second agreeable, that the Resolutions be
effective March 24, 1989, at 5:00 p.m., and until that time, the
Council's 27-month contract offer be open for acceptance by the
employees.
Mayor Kennedy stated the impasse had been a communication failure
for both sides. The Council had to not only provide for the
employees but provide services to the community and could not be
intimidated or politically threatened by employees, as she
.personally had been. She said that management and employees were
not treated equally; management did receive additional
compensation commensurate with their tremendoUs responsibilities.
· She was grateful for the employee's professionalism during the
negotiation process and th? Council had worked extremely hard
to increase wages and benefits for employees, bringina them from ~
the bottom of Oran e Count's a ' ' ~
· g y p y scale to the median.
Councilman Hoesterey commented that the City and Associations had
the .right to disagree but could.not let personal differences
prevent them from performing their jobs. He felt a contract that
offered a higher percentage wage increase Was a better option
than a forced contract with a lesser percentage. He noted that,
in his years as a Councilmember, this had been the most painful
negotiation experience.
The motion carried 4-1, Prescott opposed.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. AMENDMENTS TO TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATED TO GRADING ANDEXCAVATION
.
Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, reported
that the Planning Commission had recommended to the Council
amendments to the Tustin City Code relating to Grading and
Excavation. Staff had worked on the Ordinance for approximately
20 months and the amendments ultimately would be accompanied by
a Grading Manual. She emphasized that the proposed Ordinance
would not only apply to East Tustin areas but the 'entire City
and, if applicable in-the future, could apply to areas within the
City's sphere of influence such as the hillside areas of North
Tustin.
The Public Hearing was opened at 9:10 p.m.
Brad Olson, representing the Irvine Company, said the following
sentence contained on page 12 under Hillside Review of Ordinance
No. 1018, paragraph "n" was ambiguous: "Every permit shall also
be conditioned upon the applicant and/o~ owner's warranty of all
slopes through applicants and/or owner implementation of a. slope
warranty program subject to approval and review by the City
Attorney and Planning Commission." His preference was to have
the language deleted or restate the language to eliminate
confusion.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 3-20-89
Christine Shingleton responded regarding the background and
justification of a slope warranty program.
Council/sta-ff discussion followed regarding the ' concept,
definition and implementation of a slope warranty program.
There were no other speakers on the matter and the Public Hearing
was closed at 9:25 p.m.
Councilman Prescott thought a slope warranty program was
imperative but understood how the open-ended language in
paragraph "n" would concern 'a business owner. He suggested the
Ordinance be returned to the Planning Commission for development
of specifi~, language.
Mayor Kennedy clarified that this Ordinance would only set policy
for grading and the specific language would be developed later
when the Council and Planning Commission review each development.
The Grading Manual would provide intricate details.
Christine Shingleton commented that staff could modify the
language indicatingthatthe actual program would be returne~ to
Council for review. She noted that if introduction of the.
Ordinance did not occur at this Council meeting, the Planning
Commission's action on Tustin. Ranch Phase 4 tract map would be
delayed.
Councilman Hoesterey suggested that' COUncil proceed with action
onthe Ordinance and incorporate language.of ratification by the
Planning Commission and waiver of fees for appeal to the City
Council should there be a disagreement. He understood the Irvine
Company's concern of an open-ended liability, but felt it would
not be difficult to implement a solution...
It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Kelly, that Ordinance No.
1018 have first reading by title only and the final ordinance to
include language "subject to appeal to the City Council".
Councilman Kelly suggested contacting the City of Orange who had
recently been involved in a grading liability lawsuit.
Mayor' Kennedy understood the concerns-of-the Irvine Company but
her major concern was the protection of the City's liability and
future slope developments.
The motion carried 5-0.
Following first reading by title only of Ordinance' No. 1018 by
the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar. seconded by Hoestere¥,
that Ordinance No. 1018 be introduced~ as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1018 - AN ORDINANCE OF. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING .SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF
ARTICLE 8 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE TO ADOPT PROVISIONS RELATING
TO GRADING AND EXCAVATION
The motio~ carried 5-0.
2. ORANGE COUNTY ~AZARDOU8 WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT (EIR)
Laura Kuhn, Senior Planner, gave a background report on the
Hazardous Waste Management Plan.
Karen Peters, Manager of the Hazardous Materials Program for the
Orange County Fire Department, reviewed the contents and process
of the Hazardous Waste Management Plan.
Mayor Kennedy .opened the Public Hearing at 9:40 p.m. There were'
no speakers on this subject'and the Public Hearing was closed.
It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Edgar, to approve the
following: ·
ClTX COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 3-20-89
Vo
VI.
1. Certify the proposed EIR as adequate to serve as a program EIR
for the consideration of the Orange County Hazardous Waste
Management Plan by adoption of the following Resolution No
89-40: ·
RBBOLUTION NO. 89-40 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TUSTtN, eALIFO~IA, FINDING THAT FINAL'
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACt'-REPORT :(EIR) FOR THE ORANGE COUNTY
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE
PROGRAM EIR AND FEASIBLE. MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN
INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED-BY-THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL;] .....
·
QUALITY ACT
·
' 2. Approve the Orange County ~a'za~*dous' Waste. Management Plan by
adoption of the following Re~olution NO. 89-41:
_
RESOLUTION NO. 89-41 - A:RESO~UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALiFORNIa, APPROVING OF ORANGE COUNTY
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT' PLAI~ ..
·.
The motion carried ~-0.
·
PUBLIC INPUT ;--
1. DIAMOND LANEB
Carol? Bryant,. 15500 T~.stin~l~age Way #100, T~stin, requested
Council,s assistance in a~n~h~ a meeting with~ Caltrans to
ascertain
why a diamond la~~ '~lyov~r was dnaeteaded and she
questioned Mayor Pro Tem Edga-~-rz~ardlng raw information
from O.C.T.C. -;~ ~
Mayor Kennedy suggested that.s~4W~ite a formal letter requesting
the raw data 'from O.C.T.C. as a private citizen. The Council
would be unable to ComPly wi~-requests.
2. PROPERTY AT 195 E. MAIN
John Zahn, Star Rt. #1121, or~hu'el, spoke regarding property he
was renting at 195 E. Main Str~t,-Tustin, .and the problems that
had occurred with building improvements and his business license.
Mayor Kennedy asked him to mee~ with staff to resolve the
problems and if unsuccessful ia ~[s efforts the matter would be
agendized.
3. ANNE~D CITY AREAS WITH SANTA ANA ADDRESSES/ZIp CODES
..
Gerald Feldman', 13191 Wickshire *~ane, Tustin, representing the
Bellewick Community Associati-e~¥.~informed Council that his area
of residence, which was annexed into the City approximately two
years ago, was still receiving'mail through a Santa Aha address
and zip code. He cited several p~blems with receipt of mail and
requested Council agendize the Tu~tin address/zip code dilemma
·
Following Council discussion on the history of the situation,
counc~ concurrea to have p-e'rt~=~&nt data 'compiled and agendize
at the April 3, ~1989 Council meeting.
CONSENT CALENDAR
,eoo .d
Calendar. The motion cart%ed 5-0" '°
1. APPROVED. MINUTES - MARCH 6, 19'89 ;"REGULAR MEETING
2. APPROVED DEMANDS IN- THE AMOUNt' O~ $ 2,626,323.73
RATIFIED PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $198,618.21
3. RESOLUTION NO.. 89-4t - A 'RESOLUTI.ONOF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAIN~IMPROVEMENTS ON REBECCA LANE, GWEN
AVENUE, LUCINDA WAY AND DEBORAH DRIVE AND AUTHORIZING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
u~'~'x COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 3-20-89
Adopted Resolution NO. 89-44 approving the plans and
specifications for the subject project and authorizing
advertisement for bids.
~a~zornla Gas Cum a
291155/T-54035 in the ...... ~ ....... p n_y Contract No.
. uvunu oz ~,'224.58 and authorized the .
Mayor to execute subject' Contract. .~,~
$. BAUER VS. CITY OF TUSTIN
Approved the sum of $10,000.00 in full settlement of this
action against the City of Tustih.
VII. ORDIH~NCES FOR INTRODUCTION.- None
:
VIII'~ ORDIN]LNCBS FOR ADOPTION
~ENTBR ~D~V~PMENT PROJECT AREA - ORDINANCE NO. 1021
It was ~~~-]~~ev..~~ ~.. ~___, that Ordinance No.
1021 have second re.ad~ng by title only. The motion carr~e~
~, Prescott abstained. Following second reading by title only
of Ordinance No. 1021 by the City Clerk, it was moved by
and adopted as follows: , that Ordinance No. 1021 be passed
ORDZN;kNCB NO. 1021 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE SECOND
AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED REDEVELOPME~ PLAN FOR THE TUSTIN TOWN
CENTER AREA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
The motion carried 4-0, Prescott abstained. (Roll call vote)
Mayor Ken. nedy reque, sted staff agendiZe the blanket Certificates
of Compliance previously discussed.
2. AUDIT COMMITTEE - ORDINANCE NO. 1022
It was v e t ec d d a , that Ordinance No.
10'22 have second reading by title only. The motion carrie~
~r_Q. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance-No.
1022 by the City Clerk, it was oved Hoestere ' seconded b
d~, that Ordinance No. 1022 be passed and adopted as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1022 -AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY.CODE TO ESTABLISH
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
IX.
Council discussion followed regarding the 4-year length of term
for committee members,
William Huston, City Manag.e.r., sugge, s. ted that 'Council determine
the length of term ~y specific committee members.
.Councilman Hoesterey proposed that the current members of the
Audit Committee remain in their terms as previously assigned.
Council concurred.
Mayor Kennedy commented on Evelyn Feldman.s resignation from the
Audit Committee and requested agendizing appointment of her
replacement at the April 3, 1989 Council meeting.-
The motion carried 5-Q. (Roll call vote)
OLD BosInss
1. AIRPORT STATUS' REPORT - JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE MONITORING'
PROGRAM (JWA), COALITION FOR* A RESPONSIBLE AIRPORT i SOLUTION
(CRAS), .AIRPORT SITE COALITION (ASC) AND HELICOPTER. ovERFLiGHT
PROGRAM TAsK FORCE (HOPTF)
Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development,
suggested the CRAS slide presentation on the E1 Toro commercial
·
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 3-20-89
Xo
air~ort location be scheduled for the April 3 1989 Council
meeting. Council concurred. '
It was .moved by Hoesterev. seconded by Kenned%, to receive and
'file subject report. The motion carrfed 4~0, kdgar absent.
2. TERMS OF P~ AND RECREATION C~)MMZHHION
It was moved by Hoesterev. seconded by Kennedy, that the terms
of the Parks and Re¢=eation Commissioners remain in accordance
with the lots that were drawn on November 10, 1988.
The motion carried 4-Q, Edgar absent.
1. RE~0LUTZON NO. 89-43/TUSTIN MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
Please see Page i of these Minutes.
2. RESOLUTION NO. 89-42/TUSTIN POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
Please see Page I of these Minutes. ·
3. AIR QUALITY MANAGBME~ REPORT
Mayor Kennedy gave a brief report on the passage of the Air
Quality Management Plan.
Councilman Prescott asked that the record reflect his opposition
to the Air Quality Management Plan.
No action was taken by the Council.
4. REQUEST FOR 8TREET~ CLOSURE OF WARNER AVENUE BETWEEN PULLMAN
STREET AND WRIGHT STREET
Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, reported that Staff
had reviewed'this project Over a 2 to 3 month period. After
completion of traffic counts, it was determined that the impact
of the closure would not be as difficult on the community as was
originally thought and a Caltrans poll of businesses directly
impacted revealed three in favor of the closure, one opposed.
Council/staff discussion followed regarding increased traffic in
surrounding area due to the closure.
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar voiced his support bf Caltrans, request and
wanted another condition added to the recommendation. To insure
completion of the project in the estimated time, he requested the
estab%ishment, of timelines for each phase of the project'be
coordinated with staff, submittal of progress reports and copies
of those reports to Council.' '
Council/staff discussion fOllowed regarding the possibility of
a contractual agreement with Caltrans and communication meetings
with-the affected utility companies to safeguard the timely
completion of this project.
It was moved b E seconded b Ken ed , to authorize ('1) 'the'
closure of Warner Avenue between Pullman Street and Wright Street - ~
for a maximum period of seven months 'subject to adequate detour
signing/notification and the concurrence of the City of Santa
Aha, (2) the establishment of phase timelines with submittal of
progress reports, and (3) staff to investigate the possibility
of a contractual agreement with Caltrans.
Richard Vining, 400 W. Main Street, Tustin, voiced, his concerns
with the fIow Of traffic, on area' surface streets due 'to the
relocatiOn of the McFadden off-ramp. He cautioned Council that
Caltrans, main concern was the freeway and not the traffic impact
on surrounding streets.
u~'~'x COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 3-20-89
Council/staff discussion followed regarding similar projects
within the community and. mitigating measures that will be
coordinated between staff and Caltrans.
The motion carried 5-'0.
5. MID-YEAR BUDgeT REVIEW
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar felt. construction on the Jamboree Ro
extension throudh the M ..... - ........ -- ad
- =. _ ~,,~ ~e .snoula commence-as soon as
possible and questioned when the pro]ect would be advertised for
bid. '
B°b_Lede~decker, Director ~fPublic Works, responded that due to
the zunding source desired by the City of. Irvine and the delay
in receiving plan approval Environmental Management
· from the
~gency, the anticipated date for beginning the bid process would
be approximately Jgly 1, 1989.
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar questioned the amount of savings earned
through Assessment Districts 85-1 and 86-2.
muaget may be misle, ading because the majority of the projects in
those Assessment D~stricts were not 100% completed.
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar requested staff to provide a year-end report
using the Mid-Year Budget Report format no later than Labor Day.
Council concurred.
It was. t d a ,
following: to approve the
1. One million dollars be transferred from' the 1988-89 Genegal
Fund reserve to the Capital Improvements Fund for the Jamboree
Road extension project (Edinger to Barranca);
2.' $373,000.00 dollars be transferred from the 1988-89 General
Fund reserve to the Park Development Fund. for future City
parks located in Tustin Ranch;
XI.
3. The mid-year budget review be received and filed.
The motion carried 5-0.
REPORTS
1. 'PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - MARCH 13, 1989
·
It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded bY Edqa~, to ratify the
Planning Commission.Action Agenda of March 13 1989 The motion
carried 5-0. ' '
XII.
·
INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 1989
It was moved b H este . se o d~ed b Ed ar, to receive and file
subject report. The motlon carrled 4-%, Prescott opposed.
DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS VEHICLES AND WORK EQUIPMENT
It w. as moved b Hoeste e eco ded b a , to receive and file
sub]ect report. The motion carried 5-0.
PUBLIC INPUT - None
!Mayor K~nnedy informed members of the press that the City would have
Information available to them the following morning on the figures
used during the negotiation process.)
XIII. OTHER BUSINESS ..
1. DEBRIS ON VANDENBER~ LANE, WEST OF PROSPECT AVENUE
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar reported the area on Vandenberg, west of
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 8, 3-20-89
Prospect, wa~ still littered with
required staff attention·
·
shelves, boards, etc. and
0
SEMI-AUTOMATICS AS AN OPTION]tL P~Y WEAPON FOR POLICE .OFFICERS
It w. as . ,.to a end. · .
Ap.r.ll 3, 1989 Council meetan- the use ---: g? at the
op=lonal ~rima~ we---- ~--~'~ .... ~_~ ~em.~-au~oma=~cs as an
carried 5-=0. *~ ~v, ~ur ~ne Police Depa~cment. The ~
PUBLIC INPUT ON CMC CENTER RENO~TION
Councilman Prescott voiced his support of a citizen forum to
discuss the City Hall renovation.
·
William HustOn, City Manager,. responded that s~aff had planned
to schedule a workshop the latter part of A r~l o
Center improvements wh~-~ ......... P n the Civic
. --~ wou~ include a resentat
architect. The worksho- wo,,~ ~- --~-_~ .P . ion by the
~A waaa agenalze, at the April 1989
. 3, Council meeting the
setting of the workshop date. ,
PRESCOTT,S ABSTENTION VOTE ON RESOLUTION NO. 89-15
~ounc~man Prescott wanted these Minutes.to reflect that at the
~un_~i~ ~eetin? of February21, 1989, he Inadvertently neglected
=o a~s=ain on consent Calendar Item No. 4, Resolution 89-15.
ADJO~NT ZNMEMORY OF TUSTINMARINES
·
Councilman Prescott requested the meeting be adjourned in memory
of the T~stin Marines who died in a recent helicopter crash in
Korea.
VERNAL EQUINOX
Councilman Prescott said the vernal equinox had occurred that
morning at 7:29 a.m. and he had photographed twenty-eight eggs
standing on end.
· ·
PROCEDURE FOR A(~ENDI~IN~ SUBJECTS AT COUNCILMEMBER~S REQUEST
Councilman Hoesterey requested agendizing a Resolution to
formalize the process when a Councilmember desired to have an
item placed on the agenda.
8. PURCHASE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO TAPES
·
It was ve t e ed'b d ,
tapes of City Council mee. tings f.rom American
$30.00 per tape. The'motion carried 5-0.
10.
to purchase video
Cable Systems at
CITY PARTICIPATION iN ORANGE COUNTY',S 100TH BIRTHDAY CELEBRATION
Mayor Kennedy said Angel Stadium' had requested the City
participate, on July 5, 1989, in Orange County,s 100th birthday
celebration with an entry such as a band, float, or celebrity.
'Council concurred to solicit participation, from the school
district, Marine Base, or other c~mmunity organizations.
TRAFFIC STUDY AT FARMINGTON ROAD AND BRYAN AVENUE
Mayor Kenne.dy said she had been contacte, d by a resident who was
conc.erned with 'traffic problems at Farm~ngton and Bryan.
Bob Ledendecker,.. Director of Public Works, responded that the
area was scheduled for' a traffic study.
.' ]
~a'a'~ COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 9, 3-20-89
~rlV. ADJOURlm~NT
At 10:50 .m. th · ~
. P , e meeting recessed to the Redevelopment Agency and
~en adjourned in memory' of the Tustin. Marines to a Capital
Improvement Budget. Workshop on Monday, April 3, 1989 ·
and then .to the next Re~,l~- ~A_~ ...... · , at 5.00 p.m..
7:00 p.m. =---- ,-,-=u~n~ on Monaay,' April 3, 1989, at
MAYOR