HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 04-17-89 NUTES OF ~RE~UX~MEETINf
~F THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN~ C/~IFORN~
APRIL 17~ 1989
Io
CALL TO OP. DER/PLED~E OF ALLEGZANCE
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kennedy at 7:03 p.m. in the
· City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance
was led by Mayor Pro Tem Edgar.
INVO~TXON ·
The Invocation was given by-.Lt. James' V. Asparro,' Chaplain of the
-Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin.
III. ROLL CALL
IV.
Council Present:
Council Absent:
Others Present:
U~sula E. Kennedy, Mayor
Richard B. Edgar, Mayor Pro Tem
Ronald B. Hoesterey
John Kelly
Earl J. Prescott
None
William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Christine Shingleton, Dir./Community Development
Fred Wakefield, Acting Chief of Police
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Royleen White, Dir./Community & Admin. Services
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Monda Buckley, Administrative Assistant
Valerie Whiteman, Deputy City Clerk
Arthur Charleton, Former Tustin Mayor
Donald Saltarelli, Former Tustin Mayor
Melissa Watts' Fifth Grade Class, Estock School
Approximately 30 in the audience
PROCLAMATION - EARTHQUAKE PREPAREDNESS MONTH, APRIL 1989
Mayor Kennedy read and presented to Monda Buckley, Emergency Services
Coordinator for the City, a proclamation proclaiming April of 1989
as Earthquake Preparedness Month and requested an update on the
City's emergency plan.
Monda Buckley expressed her appreciation on behalf of the citY, the
Police Department and Orange County Fire Department and she
specifically acknowledged the tremendous efforts of Dorothy O'Kelley,
Community Services Officer. She gave a brief progress report on the
City's emergency plan. 84
Ve
PRESENTATION - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. DONATION TO TUSTIN AREA
SENIOR CENTER FUND
Pat Buttress, representing the Southern California Edison Co.,
proudly presented .a check in the amount of $4,000 as a donation to
the Tustin Area Senior Center Fund.
Margarete Thompson, Vice President of the Tustin Area Senior Center
Fund, Inc., thanked the Edison Co. for their contribution on behalf
of all senior citizens in the Tustin area.
Ray Hawley, also representing the Southern California Edison Co,,
said it was a'pleasure to support the senior citizen community. 41
VI. PUBLIC HEARING - None
VII. PUBLIC INPUT
1. SAFETY GUIDELINES FOR CHILI COOK-OFF
Michael D~vid, 445-1/2 Sixth Street, Tustin, questioned' if the
proper safety procedures/equipment would be used at the Chili
Cook-Off in June and, in citing a recent lawsuit against the City
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 4-17-89
of Newport Beach, expressed concern for potential liability to
the City of Tustin.
Fred Wakefield, Actihg Chief of Police, clarified, at the Mayor's
request, that the Police Department had a representative on the
Chili Cook-Off Committee and all necessary safety procedures had
been implemented in the past and would continue-in the future.
Additionally, he would investigate the details of the City of
Newport Beach lawsuit.
2. ~AR~NT8 WHO CAR~
~thel Reynolds, 10841 Thorley Rd., Tustin, Chairperson of Parents
Who Care, said a'misunderstanding had occurred when members of
Parents Who Care had expressed their opinions during a Council
meeting on issues such as assault weapons, abortion clinics and
pornography. She wanted to clarify that ParentsWho Care was not
involved in any issue other than those related to the education
regarding the prevention of, and intervention with, the
adolescent use of alcohol and other drugs.
VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR
Item No. 2 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilman
Prescott. It was moved by Kelly, seconded by Edgar, to approve the
remainder of the Consent Calendar. The motion carried 5-0.
1. APPROVED MINUTE8 - APRIL 3, 1989, REGULAR MEETING
3. AGREEMENT WITH ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TUSTIN
Authorized execution of the proposed agreement between the
Assistance League of Tustin and the Tustin Police Department
for the purpose of sharing in the Operation Hug-A-Bear
Project 45
Authorized the City Manager to sign a services agreement, in
the amount of $9,000 with the Pyro Spectaculars Fireworks
Company, to provide a pyro-musical show for the Annual Fourth
of July Celebration. 45
5. AGREEMENT - KENNETH EMANUELS AND ASSOCIATES
Authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement with
Kenneth Emanuels and Associates for State legislative
information. 45
6. RESOLUTION NO. 89-47 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND
AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRAFFIC
SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF EDINGER AND
DEL'AMO AVENUE
Adopted Resolution No. 89-47 accepting said work and
authorizing the recordation of the Notice of Completion. 86B
7. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2, AGREEMENTS FOR EXTENSION OF
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES
Approved the Southern California Edison Company agreements for
Jamboree Road between Irvine Boulevard and Tustin.Ranch Road,
and Tustin Ranch Road between Irvine Boulevard and Jamboree
Road, and authorized the Mayor to execute said agreements.45
·
',
8. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2, CONTRACT FOR GAS LINE EXTENSION
Approved the Southern California Gas Company Contract No.
291050/T-54276 in the amount of $73,534.98 and authorized the
Mayor to execute said contract. 45
9. POSITION OF TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR
. Authorized the addition of Water Treatment Plant Operator to
the classification/compensation plan in the Water Division at
a monthly salary range of $2,.031.15 - $2,468.88. 86
10. REQUEST FOR BOND REDUCTION, TRACT NO. 12763
Authorized the reduction of Tract No. 12763 Faithful
· Performance Bond #5241-0525 from $1,138,000.00 to $284,500.00
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
'Page 3, 4-17-89
IX.
Xo
XI.
and the Labor and Materials Bond #5241-0525 from $569,000.00
to $142,250.00. 99
11. P~SOLUTION NO. 89-48 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THEAPPLICATION FOR BICYCLE
AND/OR PEDESTRIAN FUNDS UNDER SB 821
Adopted Resolution No. 89-48 approving the application for
Bicycle and/or Pedestrian Funds under SB 821. 86
12. RESOLUTION NO. 89-49 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND
AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR CONSTRUCTION
~F PERIMETER BLOCK WALL AND ROLLING GATE AT 18602 SEVENTEENTH
STREET (WELL SITE)
Adopted Resolution No. 89-49 accepting said work and
authorizing the recordation of the Notice of Completion. 86B
13. REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVALS
Approved tree removals at the following locations: 17291
Bergen Circle, 17234 Vinewood Avenue, 14682 Dartmouth Circle,
515 S. Pacific Street and 440 W. First Street. 86
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 - Approval of Demands and ~atification
of Payroll
Councilman prescott noted large expenditures with Paramount
Stationers in Garden Grove and questioned why local stationery stores
were not utilized.
Mayor Kennedy said current policy required that every effort be made
to purchase from local establishments; however, supplies would not
be purchased at a higher price, regardless of the tax benefit, from
a local business.
William HustoD, City Manager, responded that staff did purchase day-
to-day operating supplies from local businesses, but on major or bulk
purchases would opt for the most competitive price. A tie in equal
prices would be broken by selecting the local business, as dictated
by City Code. He felt the current purchasing practice was consistent
with the City Code and suggested submitting a report outlining
current procedures.
Council concurred to agendize subject report.
It was moved by prescott, seconded by Edgar, to approve the
following'.
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,180,481.96
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $201,223.50
The motion carried 5-0.
5O
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None
ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION - None
OLD BUSINESS
1. STATUS REPORT - JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE MONITORING PROGRAM
(JWA), COALITION FOR A RESPONSIBLE AIRPORT SOLUTION (CRAS),
AIRPORT SITE COALITION (ASC) AND HELICOPTER OVERFLIGHT PROGRAM.
TASK FORCE (HOPTF)
Christine Shingleton,'Director of Community Development, gave a
status report as contained in the Community Development
memorandum dated April 17, 1989.
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar noted the necessity for receiving accurate
data in a timely manner and requested staff continue monitoring.
Mayor Kennedy asked Councilman Kelly if he would continue to
attend the CRAS meetings.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 4-17-89
Councilman Kelly responded in the negative. He explained he
wanted to remove himself from any involvement with CRAS and would
focus his attention on John Wayne Airport.
XII.
Mayor Kennedy requested agendizing, at the May 1, 1989 'Council~
meeting, the appointment of a Council representative to CRAS.
Council concurred.
It was moved by ~oesterey, seconded by Edqar, to receive and file
subject report. The motion carried 5-0. 101
NEW BUSINESS
1. AWARD' OF BID -.REPLACEMENT PLAY STRUCTURE AT'CENTENNIAL PARK
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to award the
contract for subject park improvements to Miracle Recreation
Equipment Company of Huntington Beach 'in the amount of $6,411.72.
The motion carried 5-0. 77
VISITATION FROM ESTOCK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FIFTH GP~%DE CLASS
At 7:30 p.m., Mayor Kennedy welcomed Melissa Watts' Fifth Grade
Class from Estock Elementary School. The class had their own
Mayor and Councilmembers who were seated with the City Council '
on the dias. The students introduced themselves to the Council:
"Councilmember" Carrie Gibbons, "Councilmember" Angie Furhman,
"Mayor" Amy Mason, "Councilmember" David Fague, and
"Councilmember" Jared Jarecki.
Melissa Watts reported the class, during their study of
government, had established their own City and City Council.
Their visit to the Council meeting enabled the students to have
a realistic lesson in local government operation,
2. ORAL REPORT BY LINDAANDREWS REGARDING TILLER DAYS
Linda Andrews, Chairman of the Tiller Days Committee, submitted
to the Council a balance sheet of total income and expenses for ·
the 1988 Tiller Days. After noting the success of Tiller Days
and its benefit to the community, she requested the City Council
approve a $6,000 donation to the Tiller Days fund.
Councilman Hoesterey suggested, due to the growth of Tiller Days,
that the Tiller Days Committee take full responsibility for the
coordination of all Tiller Days activities.
Linda Andrews indicated she was agreeable to the suggestion,
however, it was imperative that the Jaycees continue their
support with the Parade.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve the
donation of $6,000 to the Tustin Tiller Days Committee and that
coordination of all Tiller Days activities would be the
responsibility of the Tiller Days Committee.
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar commended Lind~ Andrews and the Committee for
the continuing success of Tiller Days. He did not feel the
success of the event Should be judged by attendance but should
be measured by the enjoyment of the community.
Councilman Kelly congratulated the Committee for their success
and requested that the spirft and enthusiasm displayed by Tustin
Meadows residents during their. July 4th celebration be integrated
to revitalize the Tiller Day Parade.
The motion carried 5-0.
41
3. APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR THE TUSTINRANCH
ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT ON THE SANTA BNA FREEWAY
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, reported the firms
recommended were companies that had previously been approved by
Caltrans for other projects.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 4-17-89
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, to approve the
professional services agreements and authorize the Mayor to
execute said agreement~ with each of the firms for the specbfic
consultant services and fees as follows: (1) Psomas- and
Associates, Construction Survey Services in the amount of
$57,000.00; (2) Leighton and Associates, Materials Testing
Services in the amount of $137,926.00;.and (3) W. L. Hartman and
Associates, Construction Inspection Services in the amount of
$149,760.00.
The motion carried 4-1, Hoesterey opposed.
45
4. APPROVAL OF PROFESSION~L SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 86-2, STORM DP.%IN DESION (PHASE IV)
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded bY Edgar, to approve the
Professional Services Agreement with Hunsaker and Associates
Irvine, Inc. to perform the engineering design services for the
Assessment District No. 86-2 Storm Drain design (Phase IV) for
a fee in the amount of $44,664.00, and authorize the.Mayor to
execute said agreement and to authorize the firm of GPS
Consulting Engineers to perform plan check services for the
project.
The motion carried 5-0.
45
5. TNENTY-YEARMASTER PLAN OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, reported on the
background of the Twenty-year Master Plan. He stated a Public
Hearing would be held by the Orange County Transportation
Commission on May 8, 1989, and should the Hearing result in
changes to the document, the City would have an opportunity to
respond.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded bY Edgar, to approve the
Twenty-year Master Plan of Transportation Improvements (dated
March 7, 1989).
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar thought the Plan would address the
transportation needs of the County and provide a funding source
for those needs. He disagreed that the issue of consolidation
should in any way be connected to. the Twenty-year Master Plan.
As an amendment to the motion, it was moved by Edgar, seconded
by Hoesterey, that the Council state their concerns regarding
consolidation and the issue of consolidation be excluded from the
Twenty-year Master Plan of Transportation Improvement.
·
As a substitute motion, it was moved.by Prescott, seconded by
Edgar, that the Council's approval of theTwenty-year Master Plan
of Transportation Improvements be.subject to the condition that
the Orange County Transportation Commission and the Orange County
Transportation District not be consolidated.
Councilman Kelly felt the Plan was propaganda. He did not
question the need for improvements, but thought current revenues
should be used as funding sources and was opposed to Council
endorsement.
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar responded that careful analysis of funding
sources indicated less than half of the money needed for
improvements was available.. Required transportation improvements
did not have adequate funding from existing sources and voter
approval of a sales tax increase would provide the monies.
The substitute motion carried 4-1, Kelly opposed.
54
6. AWARD OF BID - TUSTIN RANCH ROAD INTERCHANGE AT SANTA ANA (I-5)
FREEWAY '
It was moved by Prescott, Seconded by ~dgar,-to award the bid "in
the amount of $10,041,836.40 to the iow bidder, Steve P. Rados,
Inc. of Santa Aha, for the construction of the Tustin Ranch Road
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 4-17-89
Interchange Improvements at the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contracts for said work,
subject to the Federal Highway Works Administration approval.
Mayor Kennedy requested staf~ remind the successful bidder of the
Council's concern for the residents of Laurelwood and surrounding
areas that would be effected by the construction project.
The motion carried 4-1, Hoesterey opposed.
86B
7. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE STREET S~EEPER
It was moved by H0esterey, seconded .by Edgar, to authorize the
purchase of a new street sweeper from Haaker Equipment' Company,
·
Pomona, California, in the amount of $123,070.24.
Mayor Kennedy acknowledged that 'she had received a letter from
Nixon-Egli Equipment Co. regarding Mobile Sweepers and would
respond to their concerns.
The motion carried 5-0.
CODE ENFORCEItENT - TUSTIN CARWASH
Shakil Yassini, operator of the Tustin Car Wash, stated his
attorney was present to speak on this issue.
Paul Barnum, attorney representing Mr. Yassini, noted the Code
violations that had been corrected by Mr. Yassini and gave a
progress report of violations that were currently in the process
of being rectified. He addressed several concerns of Mr.
Yassini's which included: the origin of the complaints against
the property; a letter addressed to the property owner (not to
Mr. Yassini) with an original date of March, 1987, that had been
changed to 1988; a confrontation with a proposed developer who
would like to take possession of the property; and attempts by
the
City and property owner toward "friendly condemnation". He
stated these were the circumstances that led Mr..Yassini to
believe that a developer was attempting to take advantage of him
and obtain possession of the property using the City and/or Code
enforcement of violations.
Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, reported
there had been a two-year history of complaints concerning the
property and staff, in all cases, notified the property owner
with a copy to Mr. Yassini. She noted that staff's philosophy
on Code enforcement was to only act in response to domplaints and
staff was always willing to work at compliance with property
owners and tenants. Staff had attempted to contact Mr. Yassini
in writing and in person, but he had been unwilling, prior to the
'letter received on April 12, 1989, to make any commitments toward
correction of identified violations.
Councilman Hoesterey said since Mr. Yassini's lease would be
expiring in approximately one year and because Mr. Yassini had
taken steps to improve the property, he suggested continued
monitoring of the property but there be no requirement for major
capital improvements.
Christine Shingleton clarified that the improvements required
were minor maintenance items.
Councilman Kelly stated he was offended by the detailed
correspondence between the City and the L.A. Land Company in
Huntington Beach. He said this was a very sensitive issue that
had been aggravated by the-L.A. Land Co.
Christine Shinglet0n responded that L.A. Land Co. was the
developer for the property at E1 Camino Real and Newport Avenue
and §taff's response to their request for information was the
same as it would be for anyone who requested public information.
·
James. Rourke, City Attorney, commented that the Freedom of
Information Act required the City to make public information
available to anyone. He also wanted to clarify for the record,
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 4-17-89
because Paul Barnum had implied that the City had previously
attempted to obtain the lessee's property, that there had been
discussions with Mr. Yassini's previous attorney and the property
owner's attorney regarding possible acquisition oft he property.
An agreement was not reached. There was never any intent on the
part of the City to condemn the property other than if it had
been agreeable to all parties. The'City had no interest, now or
in the past, in attempting to terminate Mr. Yassini's lease.
It was moved by ~oesterev. seconded by_Edgar, that Mr. Yassini's
attorney meet with staff and attempt to resolve the conflict and,
if that meeting was unsuccessful, staff to resubmit the matter
in 30 days for Council action.
As a substitut~ mQt~on, it was moved by Prescott, seconded by
Kellv, that all future City correspondence with Mr. Yassini be
cleared through the Council.
Councilman Prescott stated that Mr. Yassini was an extremely har~
working immigrant and did not deserve to be harassed by the City.
Mayor Kennedy said Mr. Yassini was not being harassed, instead
he was being asked to be a good neighbor and maintain a
presentable business. She was comfortable with staff monitoring
the situation and agreed with Councilman Hoesterey's suggestio, n
of a meeting to resolve the issue.
Councilman Hoesterey noted that logistically the process would
be slowed if Council approval was required for all communication.
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar said requiring Council approval for
correspondence would increase bureaucracy and was unacceptable.
It was important that businesses were compliant with existing
Codes and, while staff did not actively search for violations,
when residents bring a violation to the attention of staff, staff
had no choice but to instigate necessary action. Because Mr.
Yassini was aggressively attempting to correct the violations,
a meeting between the parties would be acceptable.
Michael David, 445-1/2 Sixth Street, Tustin, said the City should
set an example by cleaning the lot at Prospect Avenue and Irvine
Boulevard. Mayor Kennedy directed staff to clear debris from
subject lot.
The substitute motion failed 2-3, Kennedy, Edgar, and Hoesterey
opposed.
The original motion carried 5-0.
81
At 8:20 p.m., "Mayor" Amy Mason adjourned the joint meeting of the city
council and Melissa Watts' Fifth Grade Class. Mayor Kennedy and
Councilmembers thanked the class for their interest and participation.
XIII. REPORTS
1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - APRIL 10, 1989
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to ratify the
Planning Commission Action Agenda of April 10, 1989.
Councilman Prescott requested an Appeal.of Item No. 3, Variance
No. 89-01, a request to construct double faged billboards at 1501
Nisson Road.
Council/staff discussion followed regarding the policy which
allows for appeals by a Councilmember.
CounCi~ concurred to appeal Item No. 3, Variance No. 89-01, of
the April 10, 1989, Planning Commission Action Agenda.
Councilman Prescott. requested a report from the City Attorney
outlining the City Code which.authorizes the right of appeal to
only the majority of the City Council.
The motion carried 5-0.
8O
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 8, 4-17-89
XlV.
XVe
2. XNVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF MARCH 3X, X989
It was moved by H0esterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file
subject report.
Councilman Prescott noted that two of the lending institutions
with which the City 'had over $200,000 invested had been taken
over by the Government and'he would continue to vote against the
investment Schedule until the policy was changed.
·
RonaldNault,'FinanceDirector, saidthetwolendingimstitutions
in question, Gibraltar Savings and Lincoln Savings, had not been
closed by the Government and were currently operating.~
·
William Huston, City Manager, clarified that at the joint
Council/Audit Committee workshop, Council directed the Audit
Committee to submit a recommended policy on investments.
The motion carried 4-t, Prescott opposed.
5O
INCREASE TO ORANGE COUNTY LANDFILL GATE FEES
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, gave a staff report
on the increase of landfill gate fees from $9.50/ton to
$13.75/ton approved by the Orange County Board of Supervisors.
It was moved by Kelly, seconded by Hoestere¥, to receive and file
subject report.
Councilman Hoesterey said the City should be mindful that fees
are not always used for purposes for which they are initially
collected and the County had viewed this -as a very lucrative
revenue-generating tool that supplements the County General Fund.
He wanted the City to take a strong position against that
practice ~o that the City wo~ld-not be charged through the trash
fees for other County programs.
As an amendment to the motion, .it was moved by Hoesterey,
seconded by Prescott, to direct staff to monitor future County
increases.
The motion carried 5-0.
86
4. SURPLUS SCRAP METALS
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file
notice of sale of surplus metals as provided for in Ordinance No.
871. The motion carried 5-0. 86
PUBLIC INPUT - None
OTHER BUSINESS
1. FUTURE VISITATIONS FROM SCHOOL CLASSES
Councilman Prescott suggested that students be invited to attend
Council meetings on a regular basis.
Council concurred to forward a letter to the Tustin Unified
School District Board of Educationinviting student participation
at Council meetings.
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES - FIRST AND YORBA STREETS
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar asked if underground utilities could be
incorporated'with the widening of First Street/55 Freeway and
Yorba Street between First and Irvine Boulevard.
Robert Ledendecker, Directorof Public Works, stated the easterly
side of Yorba Street, whiCh had.the utility poles,.would not be
widened. Part of the reconstruction of First Street would
include placement of conduits to accommodate possible future
underground utilities.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 9, 4-17-89
3. NEW TRASH RECEPTACLES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar noted the bus bench at First Street/Prospect
Avenue needed a trash receptacle.
Councilman Prescott voiced his concern about the unsightly trash
barrel at the Sunwest Bank bus stop.
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, said there were
many locations throughout the City that required new trash
receptacles. He suggested an inventory of locations be conducted
with a report submitted to Council for approval of a supplemental
budget appropriation.
4. BLOCK GRANT PROGI~%M
Mayor Kennedy requested agendizing, at the May 1, 1989 meeting,
staff's concern regarding the Block Grant Program.
XVI. CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Kennedy announced the City Council would recess to a Closed
Session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code
Section 54957.
XVII. ADJOURNMENT
At 8:40 p.m., the meeting recessed to the Redevelopment Agency, then
to the above Closed Session, and then adjourned to the next Regular
Meeting on Monday, May 1, 1989, at 7:00 p.m.
XVIII. FOLLOWING CLOSED SESSION
Following Closed Session, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by
Hoesterey, to adopt the following Resolution No. 39-50:
RESOLUTION NO. 89-50 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING THE RETIREMENT OF CHARLES THAYER
The motion carried 4-1, Prescott opposed.
.,x. CITY CLERK
MAYOR
lo
·
IINUTES OF /% REHUL~R MEETI
Of THE REDEVELOPMENT AHENCY
THE CITY OF TUSTIN· CALIFORNIA
APRIL 17· 1989
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Kennedy at 8:40 p.m.
in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin,
California.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Ursula E. Kennedy, Chairperson
Richard B. Edgar, Chairperson Pro Tem
Ronald B. Hoesterey
John Kelly
Earl J. Prescott
Members-Absent: None
Others Present: William A. Huston, Executive Director/City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk
Christine Shingleton, Director/Comm. Develogment
Fred Wakefield, Acting Chief of Police
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Royleen White, Director/Community & Adm. Services
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Arthur Charleton, Former Tustin Mayor
Donald Saltarelli, Former Tustin Mayor
Valerie Whiteman, Deputy City Clerk
Approximately 10 in the audience
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 3, 1989, REHULA~MEETINH
It was moved by HoestereY, secoBded.b¥ Kelly, to approve %he Minutes
of April 3, 1989. The motion garried 5-0.
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE /~MOUNT OF $143,830.56
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kelly,-to approve subject
demands in the amount of $143,830.56. The motion Carried 5-0. 60
DESIGN REVIEW 89-29
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kelly, to approve Design-
Review 89-29 by adopting the following Resolution No. RDA 89-12 as
submitted or revised:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 89-12 - A 'RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
CONSTRUCTION OF AN 8,000 SQUARE FOOT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
FACILITY/EMPLOYEE FITNESS CENTER AT 1452 AND 1472 EDINGER AVENUE
(DESIGN REVIEW 88-29)
The motion carried' 5-0. 60
1. CIVIC CENTER RENOVATION WORKSHOP· MAY 4, 1989
Councilman Prescott reminded the press there would be a workshop
on the Civic Center renovation on May 4, 1989, and requested.
their assistance in notifying the public.
At 8:42 p.m., the meeting was adjourned to the next Regular Meeting
on Monday, May 1, 1989, at 7:00 p.m.
REC?RDING SECRETARY