Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 7 HAZ MASONRY BLDGS 1-2-90DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: JANUARY 2, 1989 WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONSENT CALENDAR NO. 7 1-2-90 Inter - Com IDENTIFICATION AND PROPOSED MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS RECOMMENDATION Receive and file. BACKGROUND Recognizing the danger posed by the great number of potentially hazardous buildings in California, the State legislature in 1986, enacted the unreinforced masonry building law (Chapter 250, Statutes of 1986; SB 547 [Alquist); Government Code Section 8875 et. seq.). The law calls for identifying and mitigating hazards in unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings only by January 1, 1990. Unreinforced masonry buildings have performed, particularly poor in every damaging California earthquake and have been considered a major threat to life. Although not every URM building will collapse in a significant earthquake, a large number of them will have some degree of life threatening failure. Under the law, all local jurisdictions in California's Seismic Zone 4 were required to submit the following by January 1, 1990 to the State Seismic Safety Commission. 1. Identification of all URM buildings that are potentially hazardous. 2. Proposed mitigation program to reduce the hazard. A copy of the report submitted to the Seismic Commission is attached for the City Council's information. Christine Shingleton Director of Community Development CAS:pef 0 IDENTIFICATION AND PROPOSED MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS BUILDINGS , I AS REQUIRED BY THE UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDING LAW (SB 54'n PREPARED BY: CITY OF TUSTIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 CENTENNIAL WAY TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 (714) 544-8890 I. Background Recognizing the danger posed by the great number of potentially hazardous buildings in California, the State legislature in 1986, enacted the Unreinforced Masonry Building Law (Chapter 250, Statutes of 1986, SB 547 [Alquist]; Government Code Section 8875 et. seq.). The law requires every local jurisdiction in Seismic Zone 4 to create a list of "potentially hazardous buildings" that identifies buildings which contain walls constructed of brick or other masonry materials, built before earthquake resistant codes were enforced and which do not have steel bars embedded in the walls. Such buildings, commonly called unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings, may not withstand earthquakes well, and they have caused many injuries and deaths in large earthquakes such as the Loma Prieta Earthquake of October 17, 1989. The law requires notifying owners of these potentially hazardous buildings and suggests development of hazard mitigation programs. Under the law, jurisdictions must comply with the following by January 1, 1990. 1. Survey and identify all URM buildings that are potentially hazardous. 2. Develop a program to mitigate the hazard. 3. Submit information on potentially hazardous buildings and the proposed hazard mitigation program to the Seismic Safety Commission. II. Purpose and Scope of Work The purpose of this report is to respond to the minimum legal requirements of SB 547. In so doing, the report is divided into the following additional sections: Identification of URM hazardous buildings, and; the proposed hazard mitigation program. The report is meant to constitute the first step in implementing a comprehensive earthquake risk reduction and hazard mitigation program for unreinforced masonry buildings in the City of Tustin. III. Identification of unreinforced Masonry Hazardous Buildings A. Definition of Potentially Hazardous Buildings Under the law, a "potentially hazardous building is defined as "any building constructed prior to the adoption of local building codes requiring earthquake resistant design of buildings and constructed of unreinforced masonry wall construction. Potentially hazardous buildings include all buildings of this type, Community Development Department including, but not limited to, public and private schools, theatres, places of public assembly, apartment buildings, hotels, motels, fire stations, police stations, and buildings housing emergency services, equipment, or supplies, 'such as government buildings, disaster relief centers, communication facilities, blood banks pharmaceutical supply warehouses, plants and retail outlets." The following buildings are exempt from the legal requirements of the SB 547: 1. Warehouses and similar buildings with few occupants, unless used for emergency services or supplies (Warehouses that have been converted to retail, office or residential occupancies are not exempt). 2. Residential buildings with five or fewer dwelling units. 3. Buildings owned by the federal or state government (buildings owned by local jurisdictions are not exempt) . State law encourages protection of structures that are historically or architecturally significant; historic buildings are, as a result, treated a bit differently under the URM law. URM buildings designated as "historic" if already on lists or registers are exempt from inclusion on the list of potentially hazardous buildings. However, if these buildings are found to be hazardous, they should be included in any mitigation program developed by a City. Historic building hazard mitigation is required to follow the State Historical Building Code (Section 18950 through 18961 of the Health and Safety Code and Part 8 of Title 24 of the California Administrative Code). B. Survey Methodology The identification of URM buildings in the City of Tustin included. determining which buildings in the City were potentially hazardous and their current uses, daily occupant loads, and other information. In surveying buildings to identify those that were potentially hazardous, the following six steps were taken. 1. Building Division office records were reviewed including information collected in the City's recently completed Cultural Resources Survey. Community Development Department C. 2. Field inspection was made of the City and potentially hazardous buildings were identified based on collected field information and a review and verification of office records. The survey team included qualified inspectors experience in structural engineering with a thorough knowledge of seismic requirements as related to the types of building conditions to be covered in the survey. 3. A preliminary list of potentially hazardous buildings was compiled based on items 1 and 2 above. Property owners of each identified building were then contacted and asked to identify whether they had information that would indicate their building was not unreinforced masonry and did not need strengthening or had already been strengthened against earthquake hazards during past renovation work. 4. Upon receipt of information contained in item no. 3 above, a revised preliminary list of potentially hazardous buildings was prepared. 5. Each structure on the revised list was field checked one additional time and all survey results were analyzed including review and discussion with the City's outside building plan check consultants. Minimum information collected on all structures on the list also included but was not limited to the following: a. Street address and assessor's parcel number. b. Date of construction, type of construction. C. Property owner information. d. Current use of each building and maximum potential occupancy and square footage. e. Black and white and color photographs. f. A description of each building and possible hazards. 6. Final list and survey completed. Survey Results It is estimated that the City of Tustin has eight unreinforced. masonry buildings subject to the provisions of SB 547 all located within the "Old Town" area of Tustin and within the City's Cultural Resources Overlay District. Figure 1 identifies the general vicinity and specific location of unreinforced masonry buildings in Tustin. Table 1 provides background on each identified "Potentially Hazardous Building". Information on Table 1 is also supplemented by survey form information on each building contained in Appendix A. Community Development Department LOCATION OF P 'ENTIALLY HAZAR' -)US BUILDINGS VICINITY MAP Figure 1 LOCATION MAP THIRD STREET w J z Q w cr- Q O F— w - w wcc 0 .. . .... ..... U �' �:' a w MAIN STREET 0' 400' NORTFI 12�ETn— ^nw nnn' Bldg Address 1 355 - 365 E1 Camino Real 2 397 -399 El Camino Real 135,1451155 E. Main 3 165, 185, 191-95 E. Main (1) TABLE I POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS BUILDINGS Assessor's Parcel 401-585-005 401-585-006 401-585-001 4 120, 130, 140 and 401-623-001 150 E. Main, 401 - 405 E1 Camino Real current Year Use Built Restaurant 1922 (Bar) -50% Retail -50% Retail - 30% 1925 Office - 70% Retail (vacant)60% 1912 Office - 30% 1922 Warehouse - 10% (1) Retail 60% 1925 Dance School 40% Maximum Occupancy Group A -3/B-2 Estimated Maximum Occupants 95 B -2/A-3 100+ possibly on second floor B-2 140 30 5 115 W. Main 401-573-004 Retail - 100% 1912 B-2 30 6 130 W. Main 401-622-003 Social Lodge 1914 A-3 75 7 138 W. Main (2) 401-622-002 Office -service 1914/ B-2 50 Commercial 1964 8 140,148, 158 W. 401-622-001 Retail -40% 1914 B-2/ 100 Main Restaurant - 60% A-3 (1) 165 E. Main is a separate storage/warehouse exempt from provisions of SB547. (2) There were 1964 improvements that may have reinforced entire building - however, there are no plans or engineering or structural verification. IV. While the majority of the buildings are primarily in retail commercial uses there is also a restaurant, bar and social lodge which can create a larger number of potential occupants in these buildings. All identified buildings are privately owned. While each building does not currently qualify as a historical property as determined under Section 37602 of the Health and Safety Code, all buildings identified in the URM survey have also been recently identified in a preliminary Cultural Resources Historical Survey conducted by the City of Tustin with the very likely possibility that they will be locales designated as having historical significance in the future. Proposed Hazard Mitigation Program After identifying potentially hazardous buildings, the URM Law also requires the City to develop a mitigation program for reducing hazards to the community. The following is an outline of the proposed program. A. Immediate Program Elements to be Implemented Notification of owners of buildings identified as potentially hazardous by February 1, 1989. The owner of each building identified as potentially hazardous must be notified by law. Until actual development of a mandatory program for retrofit of existing buildings in the City, owners will be informed of the status of their buildings as "potentially hazardous and encouraged to begin reducing potential dangers. They will be provided with information on acceptable earthquake standards such as utilization of the strengthening standards contained in the Uniform Code for Building Conservation and/or the Seismic Safety Commission Model Code (a copy of the letter to be sent is attached as appendix B). B. Program Elements to be Implemented by July 1, 1990 1. Financial incentives for Seismic Retrofittincq In an effort to provide incentives to encourage owners to begin a schedule for retrofitting potentially hazardous buildings, the City will make available Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for engineering and design, planning and construction costs for any seismic reinforcements up to a maximum of $2,000,. the program should be available and fully operational by March 1, 1990. 2. Preparation of an ordinance to effect the seismic safety provisions of SB 547 indicating requirements Community Dove lopment Department for Hazard Building mitigation. Said ordinance will be: a. A result of careful consideration of the City's objective to achieve seismic safety coupled with the conservation and preservation of its historical resources. b. Result of a review of existing model ordinances including the Seismic Safety Commission Model ordinance and the Uniform Code for Building Conservation. C. Enforceable in a timely and reasonable manner. d. Result of community participation. 3. Monitoring Records on the status of compliance for each potentially hazardous building will be maintained to verify any mitigation program schedule and compliance with deadlines contained in anticipated ordinances are met. Community Development Department ' APPENDIX A FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED FORMS Exhibit D (continued) City/County: Tustin/( ;e Building Survey Form #1 Date of Field Survey: December 15, 1989 See Table 1- Building 1 Inspector's Name: Ric Lazaro aha+ Building Name Swinging Door/Surfas Furriers Address 355 & 365 F1 Camino Real_ -ocality/District T, G t i n CA 926180 _egal Description: Lot Block Tract Map 401 Page • 585 Parcel 05 )wner Arnold Surfas )wner's Address 365 E1 Camina R al T.. #- i- r 0740!1 lssessed Value: mprovements $3-4=4Land $ 109242 Total Number of Stories 1 Building Size 50 ft x 65 ft, Floor Area 3,200 sq. ft. Date of Construction— 1-922 (SKelcn building f-ootprinl Here) • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Use of Building, Bldg Name, % of Bldg Area if Mixed Use: ® Retail surfa-, Fiirri nr_ — 90 % ❑ Public Utility % ❑ Office (#. of Businesses) % ❑ Hospital ❑ Police -Department % ❑ Residential (# of Units) % ❑ Fire Department % ❑ School % ❑ Jail % ❑Pre-school % ❑ Church % ❑K - 12 % ❑ Other % ❑College % Is Building Essential for Emergency Response?E3YeSU No ❑ Hotel % Occupancy Group B-2 & A-3 ® Restaurant qwi nsi n�_.nnn-r _ i_B rren_ % Estimated No, of Occupants (Max. in 24 hrs.) 9S El Theater % Plans Available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Ind�'�ial % Any Retrofit Done? ❑ Yes ❑ No f '�!a....,ouse % Permit Date L -Garage % Qualified Historic Building? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, what List or Register? Chapler 9 Reference Malerial Exhibit D (continued) .. Building Survey Form #1 (continued) Type of Building Possible Hazards .. , . Bearing Wall ® Interior Walls? LJ Yes ❑ No Steel Frame ❑ Gables? I_I Yes F] No Concrete Frame ❑ Signs? El Yes C_J No Other ❑ (Type: ) Roof Tile? ❑ Yes ❑ No Building Shape Coping? Yes ❑ No Facing? l) Yes f. -.J No Square/Rectangle 1� Towers? Yes L=1 No L - Shape ❑ Marquees? l=J Yes ❑ No U - Shape ❑ Ornamentation? I:.l Yes 1-1 No T - Shape ❑ Chimneys? L) Yes ❑ No Irregular ❑ Other t Exterior -- - --- Abutting Buildings? [i] Yes I_ l No Veneer? ❑ Yes I I No Architectural Significance? ❑ Yes L.1 No Maximum Unsupported Wall Height Bond Beams? None Ux Floor ❑ Roof ❑ Other Notes or Comments Parapets Are there Parapets? 1:2 Yes ❑ No Unsupported Height _.._2-3 ft. Braced or Reinforced? (] Yes [� No ❑ Unknown Architectural Importance? ID Yes ❑ No Cornices Are there Cornices? f=l Yes ;a No Projection from Wall ----.— Supported or Reinforced? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Architectural Importance? )g Yes ❑ No VICINITY MAP ID11.. I'Dlf 1.4 .. ...... .. .............. 41, . \ J -/0 SWINGING DOOR/SURFAS FURRIERS 355 & 365 EI Camino Real A.P. 401-585-05 o' eoo' Nonni 400' 1800' LOCATION MAP THIRD STREET w J Z a w � Q o ,- w — w a. ¢ Q U)j N J Li U w a. MAIN STREET L. y 0' 400' NOnT1i 00' non' Exhibit D (continued) City/County: Tus tip -inge Building Survey Form #1 Date of Field Survey: December 15, 1989 See Table 1 - Building 2Inspector's Name: Ric Lazaro ' © Office (#. of Businesses) Building Name Tustin Pythian Building ❑ Hospital % Address 397 E1 Camino Real •r' Locality/District Tustin CA 92680 ❑ Residential (# of Units) .,il 7�c, ❑ Fire Department _ Legal Description: ❑ School % ❑ Jail % Lot Block Tract % ,� o��' I �.�1 i, % •585 06MaP 401 Page Parcel % `�.�• % owner Tustin Pythian Building Association % Is Building Essential for Emergency Response?❑YesgNo ❑ Hotel owner's Address 397 E1 Camino Real Occupancy Group B-2, Possibly A-3 on second f loot ❑ Restaurant Tustin, CA 92680 Estimated No. of Occupants (Max. in 24 hrs.) —1 -on ❑ Theater % Assessed Value: r % Improvements $ 103502Land $ 34518 Total 138, 020 P Number of Stories _ 2 Building Size 50 ft x 155 it Floor Area _ 15.500 sq. ft. Date of Construction 1925 (Sketch Building Foolprint Here) .ewu. . . . . . . ..,. .�..�., .. . . . . . . . . . . . Use of Building, Bldg Name, % of Bldg Area if Mixed Use: 0 Retail 30 % ❑ Public Utility % © Office (#. of Businesses) 2 __ZD % ❑ Hospital % ❑ Police Department % ❑ Residential (# of Units) % ❑ Fire Department _ % ❑ School % ❑ Jail % ❑Pre-school % ❑ Church % ❑K -12 % ❑ Other % ❑College % Is Building Essential for Emergency Response?❑YesgNo ❑ Hotel % Occupancy Group B-2, Possibly A-3 on second f loot ❑ Restaurant % Estimated No. of Occupants (Max. in 24 hrs.) —1 -on ❑ Theater % Plans Available? ❑Yes® No ❑ 10 --trial % Any Retrofit Done? ❑Yesq No L.._liouse % Permit Date Lsuarage % Qualified Historic Building? DYes ❑ No If Yes, what List or Register? Chapter 9 Reference Material Exhibit D (continued) Parapets Veneer? I1 Yes 1—I No I•y gip••. .. 'y 1 . Building Survey Form #1 (continued) Architectural Significance? LJ Yes L]No Unsupported Height ___2-3 Type of Building Possible Hazards Braced or Reinforced? 11 Yes [I No 10 Unknown Bond Beams? ..,. ,U •, Bearing Wall C� Interior Walls? L'� Yes ❑ No Steel Frame ❑ Gables? 1-1 Yes ❑ No Concrete Frame ❑ Signs? 1.=J Yes L:1 No Other ❑ (Type: ) Roof Tile? I.] Yes D No Building Shape Coping? FR Yes Ill No Facing? l: � Yes l:.J No Square/Rectangle Q Towers? 13 Yes ❑ No L - Shape ❑ Marquees? D Yes ❑ No I U - Shape ❑ Ornamentation? L'I Yes l_� No T - Shape v Chimneys? L_) Yes ❑ No Irregular ❑ Other Exterior Abutting Buildings? F�Yes 1.7 No Parapets Veneer? I1 Yes 1—I No Are there Parapets? P 191 Yes No Architectural Significance? LJ Yes L]No Unsupported Height ___2-3 ft. Maximum Unsupported Wall Height Braced or Reinforced? 11 Yes [I No 10 Unknown Bond Beams? Architectural Importance? 1­1Yes ❑ No None L: Floor ❑ Cornices Roof ❑ ,•,.; � . •. , Are there Cornices? LJ Yes Cx1 No Projection from Wall..___.___.. Other Notes or Comments Supported or Reinforced? LD Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Architectural Importance? ER Yes ❑ No This Building also includes 399 E1 Camino Real and 135, 145 & 155 E. Main Street. VICINITY MAIC o• 000' NonTrl 400' 1600/ LOCATION MAP TUSTIN PYTHIAN BUILDING 397 & 399 EI Camino Real 135, 145 & 155 E. Main Street A.P. 401-585-06 THIRD STREET w Z) J Z Q w w ] Cr Q O 1- 1— Z U w 1 w a cc v— ---:,--... c/) Jii MAIN STREET ----------- f o' 4 0 0' N O R T I Iji{�y�� ?00 noo, Exhibit D (continued) 01 ____-_____ ________.lyli►'y����ayM Building Survey Form #1 Table 1 - Building 3 City/County: Tustin/Or� ae Date of Field Survey: December 15, 1989 Inspector's Name: Ric Lazaro Building Name Perfit Building Address 195 E. Main Street Localily/District Tustin, CA 92680 Legal Description: Lot Block Tract Map 401 Page 585 Parcel 01 Owner Martin Perfit Owner's Address 366 S. Hudson Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90020 Assessed Value: Improvements $ 51221 Land $ 125528 Total 176, 749 Number of Stories 1 Building Size 140 It x 100 ft Floor Area 7, 200 sq. ft. Date of Construction 1920 (Sketch Building Footprint Here) l/ ........... .. ,r- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Use of Building, Bldg Name, % of Bldg Area if Mixed Use: 9 Retail (vacant) 60 % ❑ Public Utility Q Office (#. of Businesses) 1 30 % ❑ Hospital ❑ Police Department —___.__ 0 Residential (# of Units) % ❑ Fire Department ❑ School % ❑ Jail DPre•school % ❑ Church ❑K • 12 % ❑ Other ❑College % Is Building Essential for Emergency Response? 0 Yes 5�Vo D Hotel % Occupancy Group B-2 D Restaurant % Estimated No. of Occupants (Max. in 24 hrs.) 140 D Theater % Plans Available? ❑Yes® No D Indumtrial % Any Retrofit Done? ❑ Yes ® No �9'Vl ,ouse 10 % Permit Date L,-Uarage % Qualified Historic Building? DYes ❑ No If Yes, what List or Register? Chapter 9 Reference Material Exhibit D (continued) ❑ L - Shape M LLllo]41r6n ilh_:,la�:f41#�t.rilmnyt�rix,.mnuc� y>,uf. , MAIL , f , ( YI L �d L •,. L..M b � 1 1 .L'1_ rJ0 • :fiI51Y��y�M1�'�"JII11� �f �l .��r Building Building Survey Form #1 (continued) ❑ I Exterior ED No Type of Building Possible Hazards 0 No Other Bearing Wall n Interior Walls? b.±. Yes ❑ No Steel Frame ❑ Gables? ❑ Yes ❑ No Concrete Frame ❑ Signs? L -J Yes ❑ No Other , ❑ (Type: ) Roof Tile? 1-J Yes D No Building Shape Coping? R1 Yes LJ No Square/Rectangle ❑ L - Shape M U - Shape ❑ T - Shape ❑ Irregular ❑ I Exterior ED No Abutting Buildings? ❑ Yes Uxlo Veneer? ❑ Yes LJ No Architectural Significance? ❑ Yes LJ No Maximum Unsupported Wall Height Bond Beams? None M Floor ❑ Roof ❑ Other Notes or Comments Facing? lki Yes f_.J No Towers? 1:.1 Yes n No Marquees? L._J Yes 0 No Ornamentation? I~J Yes ED No Chimneys? LJ Yes 0 No Other Parapets Are there Parapets? L7 Yes No Unsupported Height __?-.3_ ft. Braced or Reinforced? 1-1 Yes ❑ No ®c Unknown Architectural Importance? ❑ Yes ❑ No Cornices � •, Are there Cornices? ( {yes ❑ No Projection from Wall.___ 1' Supported or Reinforced? ❑ Yes ❑ No Unknown Architectural Importance? ® Yes ❑ No 11115 uulluing also incluaes-lbs, 185, 191 & 193 E. Main Street. 165 E. Main Street is presently being used as storage use -and is exempt from the nrnv;�;nnc of (ZR sA7 VICINITY MAP L, ____:1. �. ` YIf .{ • _ ��. _�. .. ....... .�.__�_.._._.. �/ • o' 800' oo' NORTH 400' 1800' LOCATION MAP PERFIT BUILDING 165, 185, 191, 193 & 195 E. Main Street A.P. 401-585-01 THInD STREET Lu —I Z Q w � Q O �- F— Z U W c L11 ccCL U O � J � U lit mai �f1ti.� . 0.. MAIN STREET f 0' 400' NORTll •ri M H A C O U 0 •r -f CL 15 L Cl U r-{ O � O Z -'r cm C= CJ •E m ¢ M 00 CC1 O F- 00 CD 69 •L7 c c3 LrI O EA =3 cn ct1 C ::> O E cn � o N Q, c' E Q IC)U) Ln o c 0 CEJ 111 • U •� =3 O M N C `o cn ca o a� U L CD _ c ¢ O E .2 o a' O = O Z m U -- --- --- ------ --- - —L..� �_ . - - - ' U (� iCIN ca ca F— CC- M N U O O C c' cz0- m C) O •r U .� .- 1 r 0 -CL U U O � •r � �. ) C) Qa .` vi I cv c I __j C M 00 CC1 O F- 00 CD 69 •L7 c c3 LrI O EA =3 cn ct1 C ::> O E cn � o N Q, c' E Q IC)U) Ln o c 0 CEJ 111 • U •� =3 O M N C `o cn ca o a� U L CD _ c ¢ O E .2 o a' O = O Z m U -- --- --- ------ --- - —L..� �_ . - - - ' N ❑ C) (n C O CA �- n- -C CL N >• -� L29 ❑ ❑ U C X N N to a' CA EN�❑❑ ❑� W 1 P c Cl. cm (D cn Cf .- C) Q c a cm CD - `a U � CC E c O Q p �• m O _?. cz E Cf)a-) O O O C O V O •cn C5 O CZ) CU Q W �` C:) C) cv .Q CD i L c c a)� Ca .tC 3 C) .o -� _ � Q •� - _ '� a. ❑❑❑❑ S d- � El U El O m L' 0 •E u c a- -cc E a` .)i �o�0000�000 x p ca a� d Z7 C13 w O 0 U E ^ ca Z En cn N _ C C --D C3 C3] • O O CTS CU C) .O O -C _ � O c N c O v U O _ O U N N "-- Cn O O _` O U cn cc _ O cla a�CD[L U -N O Y p U o «7 a ca rn N O cc � ❑ ❑ ❑ = ct F- a ®❑ 0❑ ❑❑❑❑LJcu Exhibit D (continued) C_: L - Shape ki Building Survey Form #1 (continued) ❑ T - Shape ❑ Type of Building Possible Hazards Exterior D No r • I—] Yes , . y a Bearing Wall Interior Walls? kJ Yes ❑ No Steel Frame ❑ Gables? 1.=J Yes ❑ No Concrete Frame ❑ Signs? 171 Yes Lel No Other ❑ (Type: ) Roof Tile? LJ Yes CJ No Building Shape Coping? l_J Yes ❑ No Square/Rectangle C_: L - Shape ki U - Shape ❑ T - Shape ❑ Irregular El Exterior D No Abutting Buildings? 9 Yes 17 No Veneer? ❑ Yes CI No Architectural Significance? ❑ Yes ❑ No Maximum Unsupported Wall Height _._.... Bond Beams? None E Floor ❑ Roof ❑ Other Notes or Comments Facing? I)fl Yes No Towers? Ixl Yes C : l No Marquees? L] Yes CI No Ornamentation? 1."=1 Yes D No Chimneys? I—] Yes ❑ No Other Parapets Are there Parapets? 9 Yes Q No Unsupported Height _-2_� ft. Braced or Reinforced? 1-1 Yes n No ❑ Unknown Architectural Importance? a1 Yes ❑ No Cornices Are there Cornices? ❑ Yes D No Projection from Supported or Reinforced? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown ance? ❑ Yes 0 No E. Main Street VICINITY MAP • tip. y i1r�.,n--�1'- 1 � f � •� TTY •'TTr 1. iV1 •'1�__ ______._.__.._ -___ .:i•1�. iii•:•: �:�: :•:•'�;.;.;. ._ _. • I \\•\ � :x';11. f :I �, �.%•� �'. • o' aoo' AO NORTH IM 400' 1800' LOCATION MAP DANCE SCHOOL BUILDING 401 & 405 El Camino Real 120, 130, 140 & 150 E. Main Street A.P. 401-623-01 THIRD STREET w D' J Z Q w w > CL Q O F- f- Z U w — w w (L C ° U U) `n J tr U — w a MAIN STREET f I� o' 400' NORT11� Exhibit D (continued) City/County: Tustin/r ge t: t Building Survey Form #1 Date of Field Survey: December 15, 1989 . Table 1 — Building 5 Inspector's Name: Ric Lazaro , - ... ;.� '..Nl....�1.;'dt.r'.J r.,,,; ;.1'.v •:1 .,:,' ',+t')r� �•{-'�ri: Building Name- Tustin Hardware Address 115 W. Main Street Locality/District Tustin, CA 92680 Legal Description: Lot Block Tract j Map Page -573 Parcel 04 Owner Gerald Aunger Owner's Address C Anchorage Way Newpoer Beach, CA 92663 i Assessed Value: Improvements $ 11150 Land $14140 Total $. 25,290 Number of Stories- 1 Building Size 34 ft x 90 ft Floor Area 3,060 sq. ft. Date of Construction 1912 (Sketch Building Footprint Here) ................................ .`r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ............. Use of Building, Bldg Name, % of Bldg Area if Mixed Use: 0 Retail Tustin Hardware 100 % ❑ Public Utility °/ ° ❑ Office (#. of Businesses) % ❑ Hospital % ❑ Police Department % ❑ Residential (# of Units) % ❑ Fire Department % ❑ School % ❑ Jail % ❑Pre-school % ❑ Church % ❑ K -12 % ❑ Other % ❑College % Is Building Essential for Emergency Response?[] Yeg No ❑ Hotel % Occupancy Group B-2 ❑ Restaurant %° Estimated No. of Occupants (Max. in 24 hrs.) 30 ❑ Theater % Plans Available? ❑ Yes [XI No ❑ Indactrial % Any Retrofit Done? ❑Yes❑ No souse % Permit Date L-,-uarage % Qualified Historic Building? ❑Yes[) No If Yes, what List or Register? Chapter 9 Reference Material Exhibit D (continued) �a y wY1 V:T - ILTlf 1`� rttlk�ll .:. l}:t1b�.ilCfiiW� ��...yy44� w%�i�Y��l�i.�l%b�Y1R.Li�)�. �7 �I ^'• ►. ��r l'JI'l�,>�4 t)+'�:� l .1, y� CL yLL)��tYl��i"l -kv �i�i�i�il. _y►iYYiLNYl�i �'l�/ Building Survey Form #1 (continued) Type of Building Possible Hazards .; Bearing Wall a Interior Walls? U Yes ❑ No Steel Frame ❑ Gables? l 1 Yes ❑ No Concrete Frame ❑ Signs? ❑ Yes ❑ No Other ❑ (Type: ) Roof Tile? ❑ Yes ❑ No Building Shape Coping? i� Yes ❑ No Facing? L2 Yes E. I No Square/Rectangle R7 Towers? l-] Yes ❑ No L - Shape ❑ Marquees? 0 Yes C] No U- Shape ❑ Ornamentation? l :a Yes ❑ No T- Shape ❑ Chimneys? I_J Yes ❑ No Irregular FI Other I Exterior .�»M/SMI)MdMA►:IlflfJf..•Vl.h'i. ..uM./nl��.lv1 Na.JCMtif •R..w�WrY/ Abutting Buildings? 1E Yes 1-1 No Veneer? ❑ Yes 11 No Architectural Significance? ❑ Yes -:1 No Maximum Unsupported Wall Height Bond Beams? None ❑ Floor ❑ Roof ❑ Other Notes or Comments Parapets Are there Parapets? Yes ❑ No Unsupported Height 2-3_..___... ft, Braced or Reinforced? I :I Yes No EJ Unknown Architectural Importance? 1XI Yes ❑ No Cornices Are there Cornices? (Yes ❑ No Projection from Wall Supported or Reinforced? I.] Yes ❑ No Xk—] Unknown Architectural Importance? PC] Yes ❑ No VICINITY MAP LOCATION MAP TUSTIN HARDWARE 115 W. Main Street A.P. 401-573-04 THIRD STREET W Z J Z Q W W > � Q O ►— � Z U w a w • •. cc ►- U O cn J n- W n. MAIN STREET I L -Y NORTH Ae[: 0' 400' \ l lei _J Exhibit D (continued) City/County: Tustin/ .ge Building Survey Form #1 Date of Field Survey: December 15, .1989• S, fable 1 - Building 6 Inspector's Name: Ric Lazaro I, Building Name Diocese of Orange Address130W. Main Street Locality/District Tustin, CA 92680 Legal Description: ' ` My •, ��.r�. ��' Block T Lot ract °y';''r Ma 401 Pa 622 P 03 Owner Doicese of Orange Education and Welfare Owner's Address St. Cecilia Rectory P.O. Box 1048 Tustin, CA 92680 Assessed Value: Improvements $ 15686 Land $ 10423 Total 26, io9 ` - r , t •1 •yj Number of Stories y l 'j Building Size 10 ft x 60 fl. Floor Area 1,800 sq. ft. Date of Construction 1914 :'y1•7 (Sketch Building Footprint Here) . ............................ :' Via' ' 7+r�..;i+t•f , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Use of Building, Bldg Name, % of Bldg Area if Mixed Use: ❑ Retail % ❑ Public Utility ❑ Office (#. of Businesses) % ❑ Hospital ❑ Police Department ❑ Residential (# of Units) % ❑ Fire Department ❑ School % ❑Pre-school % ❑K-12 % ❑College % ❑ Hotel % ❑ Restaurant % ❑ Theater % ❑Inc+•—'Tial % "/a.,..iouse % L, -garage _ % Chapter 9 Reference Malerial ❑ Jail % t ❑ Church R% OtherSocialHall 100 % t. Is Building Essential for Emergency Response?FlYesD No Occupancy Group A-3 Estimated to No. of Occupants (Max. in 24 hrs.) 79 Plans Available? ❑ Yes ❑ No Any Retrofit Done? ❑ Yes ❑ No Permit Date Qualified Historic Building? ❑Yes❑ No If Yes, what List or Register? % % ;. l °/ ° ° ❑ Jail % t ❑ Church R% OtherSocialHall 100 % t. Is Building Essential for Emergency Response?FlYesD No Occupancy Group A-3 Estimated to No. of Occupants (Max. in 24 hrs.) 79 Plans Available? ❑ Yes ❑ No Any Retrofit Done? ❑ Yes ❑ No Permit Date Qualified Historic Building? ❑Yes❑ No If Yes, what List or Register? Exhibit D (continued) Building Survey Form #1 (continued) Type of Building Possible Hazards Bearing Wall b Steel Frame ❑ Concrete Frame ❑ Other ❑ (Type: Building Shape Interior Walls? E Yes ❑ No Gables? 1 Yes ❑ No Signs? I. -D Yes LJ No Roof Tile? 1=1 Yes l J No Coping? Yes L- No Facing? } Yes L_:J No l . I i i Veneer? ❑ Yes F-] No Are there Parapets? baYes 1771 No Architectural Significance? ❑ Yes C -J No p g Unsupported Height__..? -3_.. ft. - Maximum Unsupported Wall Height _.._.___�_____ Braced or Reinforced? I::I Yes ❑ No I Unknown 3ond Beams? Architectural Importance? 1: Yes ❑ No None ❑ Floor ❑ Cornices Roof 1771:LL7E2•���.;�Sc�r.,,_�_.T•,�='t►��;lh•. �E�lr"�t)�L�fk�,�:w��.vr.:a���e„vru,� Are there Cornices? U Yes Ek No Projection from Wall— Supported or Reinforced? [.']Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Architectural Importance? Ll Yes ❑ No Other Notes or Comments 'x•46 Square/Rectangle t Towers? L_i Yes Ll No L - Shape ❑ Marquees? U Yes ❑ No U - Shape ❑ Ornamentation? 1=l Yes D- No T - Shape ❑ Chimneys? 1.-7 Yes ❑ No Irregular D Other Exterior Abutting Buildings? �1x Yes CI No Parapets l . I i i Veneer? ❑ Yes F-] No Are there Parapets? baYes 1771 No Architectural Significance? ❑ Yes C -J No p g Unsupported Height__..? -3_.. ft. - Maximum Unsupported Wall Height _.._.___�_____ Braced or Reinforced? I::I Yes ❑ No I Unknown 3ond Beams? Architectural Importance? 1: Yes ❑ No None ❑ Floor ❑ Cornices Roof 1771:LL7E2•���.;�Sc�r.,,_�_.T•,�='t►��;lh•. �E�lr"�t)�L�fk�,�:w��.vr.:a���e„vru,� Are there Cornices? U Yes Ek No Projection from Wall— Supported or Reinforced? [.']Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Architectural Importance? Ll Yes ❑ No Other Notes or Comments 'x•46 VICINITY MAN Flf � •iion__ - � DIOCESE OF ORANGE 130 W. Main Street A.P. 401-622-03 AO o' NOnTH 400' 1800' LOCATION MAP -dj�o' 400• NORTH �l f � coo' nOW Exhibit D (continued) City/County: TUSTIN/0 E AN lkmm Building Survey Form 41 Date of Field Survey: DECEM13ER 15, 1.989 TA13LE 1 — 13UILDING 7 Inspector's Name: RIC LA%ARO Building Name Rose Marie's Draperies Address 138 W. Main Street Locality/District Tustin, CA 9?r�go Legal Description: Lot Block Tract i 401 Map Page .622 Parcel 02 Owner Joseph Zamora I Owner's Address 23881 via Marngall Mission Viejo, CA 92692 I Assessed Value: Improvements $15--1 80 Land $ 10, 423 Total $ 26,109 Number of Slories 1 _— Building Size 77' - 8" —ft x 24'-7" ft. Floor Area l 908 - sq ft Dale of Construction 1914/1964 (see common t5) (Sketch Building Footprint Here) Use of Building, Bldg Name, % of Bldg Area if Mixed Use: ; ❑ Retail % ❑ Public Utility — 9 Office #. of Businesses ) 1 100 ° — --- /° Cl Hospilal - -- ---- - � ° /o - ❑ Police Department __._.. _.___. � % ❑ Residential (# of Units) % ❑ Fire Department--.---__ o ❑ School % ❑ Jail /° _ % E ❑Pre-school % ❑ Church ___ % ; ❑K - 12 % ❑ Other-----_ ❑Collo g e ❑ Hotel ° /o Is Building Essential for Emergency Response? ❑Yes © No % Occupancy Group B-2 I ❑ Restaurant % Estimated No. of Occupants (Max. in 24 hrs.) so C1 Theater % Plans Available? D Yes ❑ No I El IrJ` -trial % Any Retrofit Done? '. Yes Cl No ❑'�,CA,(�house % Permit Dale L uarage % Qualified Historic Building? ❑Yes[I No If Yes, what List or Register? t Chapter 9 Reference Material Exhibit D (continued) Building Survey Form #1 (continued) Type of Building Possible Hazards \r�f1U1'd'.fi't's .1.•6.'. r.1M?'/..:hilt:Jelll.nt'LCMQCtH1Yl��L•Ea.0M11wIwM�.�tM. tiatil.n� Bearing Wall 7X Steel Frame ❑ Concrete Frame ❑ Other ❑ (Type: ) Building Shape Square/Rectangle RR L - Shape ❑ U - Shape ❑ T - Shape ❑ Irregular ❑ Exterior ❑ No A,butting Buildings? (Yes C-1 No Veneer? ❑ Yes C_J No Architectural Significance? UYes ❑ No Maximum Unsupported Wall Height Bond Beams? None ❑ Floor ❑ Interior Walls? LXJ Yes ❑ No Gables? D Yes ❑ No Signs? L_J Yes L) No Roof Tile? ❑ Yes ❑ No Coping? JD Yes ❑ No Facing? F� Yes CJ No Towers? I_I Yes 1=1 No Marquees? L_1 Yes ❑ No Ornamentation? C.1 Yes ❑ No Chimneys? I-) Yes ❑ No Other Parapets Are there Parapets? U Yes ❑ No Unsupported Height _ 2-3feet possible ft. Braced or Reinforced? E] Yes ❑ No RR Unknown Architectural Importance? F -I Yes ❑ No Cornices Roof Li 1 Are there Cornices? LJ Yes El No Are from Wall...__.___ Other Notes or Comments AbbW Supported or Reinforced? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Architectural Importance? � ] Yes ❑ No The original building was constructed in 1914 with 8" concrete walls. About 1964, a 24'-7" x 37'-8" concrete block structure was added to the rear of the original building. While the owners understand that the roof and floor for the entire building old and new were replaced at the time of the addition, the City and owner have no plans to verify the extent of work on the original building and compliance with lateral force resistance re The owner also claims that the original building was reinforced concrete walls. VICINITY MAP //-/J L IU its /V•I• •.�i I. _ ,•„„ 1 •V t 1-4 -EJ,,:- ]EIL. ............. / ••1 ,,Xx j::� 0' boo' 00' NORTH 4 00' i 800' LOCATION MAP ROSE MARIE'S DRAPERIES 138 W. Main Street A.P. 401-622-02 0' 400' NORTH �� ��' non' Exhibit D (continued), Building Survey Form 41 .See Table 1 — Building 8 `r ,y. c City/County: TUSTT- "'RANGE Date of Field Survey: December 15, 1989 . Inspector's Name: Ric Lazaro Building Name Ru tabegorz Address 158 w. Main Street- Locality/District Tustin, CA 92680 Legal Description: Lot Block Tract Map 401 Page • 622 Parcel 01 Owner_ Robert Lindquist 1 9911 Hi hcliff Drive I Owner's Address � � Santa Ana, CA 92705 c Assessed Value: Improvements $ 124440Land $52719 Total $ 177,159 Number of Stories 1 Building Size 120 ft x 75 ft. Floor Area - 9,000 sq It Date of Construction 1914 (Sketch Building Footprint Here) Ir Use of Building, Bldg Name, % of Bldg Area if Mixed Use: E3:Retail _Z10 % ❑ Public Utility YO ❑ Office (#. of Businesses) % ❑ Hospital o /o ❑ Police Department ❑ Residential (# of Units) % ❑ Fire Department I ❑ School % ❑ Jail __ ❑Pre-school % ❑ Church ❑K - 12 % ❑ Other ❑College % Is Building Essential for Emergency Response? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Hotel % Occupancy Group B-2 & Possibly A-3 ® - Restaurant - I, ah por7 60 % Estimated No. of Occupants (Max. in 24 hrs.) 100 ❑ Theater % Plans Available? ❑ Yes ❑ No D— lustrial _ % Any Retrofit Done? 17 Yes El No 17• .; arehouse % Permit Dale LJ Garage % Qualified Historic Building? 0YesF1 No If Yes, what List or Register? Chapter 9 Reference Material Exhibit D (continued) t7..'= - Building Survey Form #1 (continued) I Type of Building Possible Hazards v Bearing Wall ball Interior Walls? kjYes Cl No Steel Frame I-] Gables? l -I Yes [.1 No Concrete Frame I Signs? I__.I Yes La No Other n (Type: ) Roof Tile? 1':1 Yes L_l No Building Shape Coping? XXYes U No IN9 Facing? likYes L_..1 No Square/Reclangle C Towers? I. I Yes C-1 No L - Shape L_7 Marquees? LJ Yes El No U - Sha e L.I P Ornamentation? IXkYes (.J No T - Shape F 1 Chimneys? I .J Yes Ia No Irregular l_:a Other iExteriorbwlw I* .M N.JA �... 11 q 1- A Abutting Buildings? 1-1 Yes 1-I No Parapets Veneer? (-1 Yes C I No Are there Parapets? p X � ..I Yes Cl No ;I Architectural Significance? LI Yes I_ I No Unsupported Height ___2-3__,— ft. _ Maximum Unsupported Wall Height ---- - -- Braced or Reinforced? l:._1 Yes _ L_..) No ❑ Unknown Bond Beams? None Cox Architectural Importance? Yes ❑ No Floor ❑ Cornices Roof CJ „,- Are there Cornices? U Yes U No Projection from Wall I Other Notes or Comments ., . . t Supported or Reinforced? I _I Yes U No U Unknown Architectural Importance? Yes ❑ No The Building also includes 140, 148 & 150 W. Main Street VICINITY MAN (1' ---Boo* o n' N011T11 ?�- 400' 1800' LOCATION MAP RUTABEGORZ 140, 1487 150 & 158 W. Main Street A.P. 401--622-01 0' 400, NOnTII -'I1ff' nnn' APPENDIX B PROPOSED PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION LETTER Date PROPERTY LOCATED AT: (Address) Dear Property Owner: Widespread concerns over earthquake safety caused the State Legislature to pass SB 547 in 1986. This law requires every local jurisdiction in Seismic Zone 4 to identify all "potentially hazardous buildings", which are defined as buildings that contain walls constructed of brick or other masonry materials, and that are not reinforced. Such buildings, commonly called "unreinforced masonry buildings", do not withstand earthquakes well, and they have caused many injuries and deaths in large earthquakes. The City of Tustin has completed and compiled a list of "potentially hazardous buildings" consisting of approximately eight unreinforced masonry buildings within the City of Tustin. As we mentioned in our previous letter to you and as determined from your response to us and verification of technical data, the building referenced above is considered an unreinforced masonry building and has been included on a list of "potentially hazardous buildings" until additional verification is provided that indicates the building meets minimum earthquake standards or the building is structurally altered to conform to such standards. The State requires jurisdictions to enact local ordinances or other mitigation programs to reduce the hazard posed by these buildings. The City of Tustin is currently developing an ordinance that will require structural repairs to your building. It is expected that an ordinance will be in effect by July 1, 1990. Public hearings to discuss the ordinance will be held in the near future. Should you wish to be notified of said hearing dates, please contact the City of Tustin Community Development Department. In the meantime, you should be aware that unreinforced buildings can collapse and endanger lives during earthquakes, even moderate earthquakes. The City would, therefore, strongly encourage you to begin planning seismic strengthening of your building even before adoption of an ordinance by the City. A model ordinance which contains acceptable standards for strengthening buildings prepared by the State Seismic Commission is attached as well as provisions contained in the Uniform Code for Building Conservation. In an effort to provide incentives to encourage owners to begin a schedule for retrofitting potentially hazardous buildings, the City anticipates making available, by application to eligible property owners, grant funds for engineering, design, planning and/or construction of seismic reinforcements up to a maximum of $2,000. Page two This program should be available by March 1, 1990. Please contact Beth Schoemann with the Community Development Department for program guidelines. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact the City. Sincerely, Christine A. Shingleton Director of Community Development CAS:kbc