Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 4 PMS CITY OF TUSTIN 2-5-90T qo CONSENT CALENDAR NO. 4 2-5-90 h. .�► Inter - Com DATE: JANUARY 17, 1990 TO: WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL REPORT AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PMS) FOR THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council at their meeting of February 5, 1990, accept the final report and computer program for development of the Pavement Management System that was completed recently by BSI Consultants, Inc. for the City of Tustin. BACKGROUND The City of Tustin had entered into professional services agreement on June 6, 1988 with BSI Consultants, Inc. to develop Pavement Management System (PMS) for pavement network within the City of Tustin, excluding the portion of roads within the newly developed areas in east Tustin. The system was used to assess pavement condition and structural adequacy, identify and prioritize pavement maintenance needs, evaluate the cost-effectiveness of maintenance and rehabilitation strategies, develop annual work schedules, and determine current and long term funding requirements. DISCUSSION Attached is the executive summary of the final Pavement Management System for the City Councils review. A copy of the final report is available at the Engineering Division office for further reference. Staff will utilize this report to program the City's major street maintenance needs through 1993-1994. Additionally, it will be utilized as one of the many requirements to qualify for future state/federal gasoline tax grants/programs. The attached final report shows that the pavement network (excluding roads in east Tustin) is comprised of approximately 204 lane miles of paved roadway with an estimated replacement value of over $45 million. The overall condition of the network is good with an approximate 7% of the network in need of rehabilitation in the form of overlay or reconstruction. Preventive maintenance (slurry seal) is recommended for all streets every 5-7 years. Five-year annual budgets were recommended, beginning with 1989-90 fiscal year and ending with 1993-94 fiscal year, with an average annual budget of $518,000. At this level of funding the overall condition of City's pavement network will remain relatively stable, showing only a slight decrease in the network rating. However, if the 1988-89 fiscal budget of $370,000 (inflated at 5% annually) is maintained as funding level for the next five fiscal years, the network rating will decrease significantly below acceptable level and create a maintenance backlog that will cost approximately $1.5 million to restore the network to it's present level of service. Pavement Management System page 2 own Bob Ledendecker Director Public Works/City Engineer BL: WA: j Attachment Wisam Altowaij i Associate Civil Engineer If 14L W -A I 5A Final Report ------- Development of a Pavement Management System Presented to: City of Tustin, California ,July, 1989 Ly-fi CONSULTANTS, INC. CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA DEVELOPMENT OF A NETWORK PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FINAL REPORT BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. 16880 W. Bernardo Drive San Diego, California 92127 July, 1989 Copyright (c) 1989, BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. All Rights Reserved The enclosed report contains information of a proprietary nature which is not to be disclosed without the prior written consent of BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMEMARY 1 The Pavement Network 1 Five -Year Annual Budgets 2 The PMS Reports 3 WHAT IS A PMS? 5 Background 5 PMS Framework 6 PMS Levels 7 PMS Benefits 7 PMS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 9 Preliminary PMS Development Issues 9 Field Inventory 9 Structural Adequacy 10 Data Base Development 13 Design Process 15 Data . Analysis 16 Prioritization 17 Report Generation 17 Software 17 Training 18 Documentation 18 DISCUSSION 20 Commitment 22 The Importance of Preventive Maintenance 23 II NETWORK VALUE REPORT III INVENTORY/CONDITION DATA REPORT (NAME SEQUENCE) IV CONDITION DISTRIBUTION REPORTS Entire Network Major Arterial Primary Arterial Secondary Arterial Commuter/Collector Local V CONDITION SUMMARY REPORT -^ VI STRUCTURALLY INADEQUATE UNITS VII ANNUAL BUDGET REPORTS Fiscal Year 1988-89 Fiscal Year 1989-90 Fiscal Year 1990-91 Fiscal Year 1991-92 __. Fiscal Year 1992-93 VIII ACTION FORECAST REPORT (NAME SEQUENCE) IX DETAILED WORK REPORTS (NAME SEQUENCE) Fiscal Year 1988-89 Fiscal Year 1989-90 Fiscal Year 1990-91 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Fiscal Year 1992-93 Fiscal Year 1993-94 ii X ANNUAL ACTION REPORT Fiscal Year 1988-89 Fiscal Year 1989-90 -- Fiscal Year 1990-91 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Fiscal Year 1992-93 - Fiscal Year 1993-94 XI ANNUAL REPAIR REPORT Fiscal Year 1988-89 Fiscal Year 1989-90 Fiscal Year 1990-91 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Fiscal Year 1992-93 -- Fiscal Year 1993-94 APPENDIX A FIELD DATA PARAMETERS B SCHEDULING PARAMETERS C DETERIORATION TABLES AND CURVES D COMPUTER REPORT DESCRIPTIONS E DYNAMIC DEFLECTION INFORMATION iii F__X_E_CLJTrVE SUNDAARY BSI CONSULTANTS, INC., has recently completed the design and development of a Computerized Pavement Management System (PMS) , for the City of Tustin, California. The system was used to assess pavement condition and structural adequacy, identify and prioritize pavement maintenance needs, evaluate the cost-effectiveness of maintenance and rehabilitation activities, develop annual work schedules, and determine current and long- range funding requirements. The Pavement Network Use of the term pavement network in. this report refers to that portion identified by the City to be included in the study. The area referred to by the City as East Tustin is not included in any discussion, budgetary projections or work schedules in this report and was not entered into the PMS database. The pavement network is comprised of approximately 204 lane miles of paved roadway. Based on standard section thicknesses (defined by pavement type and classification), the network has an estimated replacement value of over $45 million. A visual survey of the network was conducted to assess the existing surface condition of individual pavement segments. As a follow-up to the visual survey, Dynamic Deflection analysis was conducted throughout the pavement network to ascertain the structural adequacy of the various pavement segments. This type of non-destructive testing (NDT) equipment exerts a 1,000 pound (peak -to -peak) dynamic load at a frequency of eight cycles per second onto the roadway surface through two steel wheels. Refer to Appendix E for more information regarding the dynaflect device. On the basis of the condition assessment, pavement segments were scheduled for cost-effective preventive maintenance, major maintenance, rehabilitation and/or reconstruction activities. Definitions of each activity category are presented below. PREVENTIVE Surface treatments (e.g., slurry seal) applied to MAINTENANCE pavements with minimal or no surface distress (e.g., longitudinal, transverse and random cracking, ravelling, etc.) to provide new wearing surfaces and extend pavement life. MAJOR Surface treatments generally utilized as "holding actions" MAINTENANCE or "stop -gap" solutions (e.g., patching and repairs) to delay the need for pavement structural strengthening. 1- REHABILITATION Treatments intended to strengthen pavement sections which are structurally deficient (e.g., asphaltic concrete overlays). RECONSTRUCTION The removal of an existing pavement section. to a prescribed; depth, followed by the placement of a conventional flexible pavement section (i.e., aggregate subbase, aggregate base and asphaltic concrete), rigid pavement section (i.e., base course and Portland cement concrete), or a full -depth asphalt pavement section. That portion of the pavement network which is either structurally inadequate to support existing traffic levels or has deteriorated to the point where preventive maintenance is no longer viable or cost-effective, comprises what is termed the maintenance" "backlog." Results from the visual condition survey indicate the overall condition of the City's streets to be good with approximately 93 percent of the pavement network falling within the preventive maintenance category, while an estimated 7 percent makes up the maintenance backlog. In the backlog category, approximately 0.2 percent of the network is in need of major maintenance, and the remaining percentage has deteriorated to the point where rehabilitation is necessary. Following the visual condition survey, deflection testing was performed to determine the structural adequacy of each pavement segment. This testing revealed that only a total of 35 segments out of a total of 784 segments, or 5.7% of the entire street network (in terms of total surface area), was found to be structurally inadequate. This follow-up testing also supported the findings from the visual condition survey that the overall network is in good condition. Five -Year Annual Budgets Based on the current condition of the pavement network and the projected rate of deterioration of the individual pavement segments in the coming years, annual budgets have been prepared for each of the next five (5) fiscal years (1989-90 through 1993-94) by maintenance district. These budgets are summarized below and represent estimated funding requirements (inflated at 5% annually) needed to maintain the pavements at a desirable level of service. This means,. that those pavement segments currently, in good condition will receive periodic preventive maintenance (i.e., slurry seals) to provide new wearing surfaces and extend 2 pavement life, while those pavement segments which are structurally inadequate or have deteriorated to the point that preventive maintenance is no longer cost-effective will receive major maintenance rehabilitation or reconstruction in order to return them to an acceptable level of service. FISCAL PREV. MAJOR YEAR MAINT. MAINT. REHAB. RECONST. TOTAL 1988-89 $ - 1802124 $ 61878.00 $ 218,415 $ .00 $ 405,417 1989 - 90 148,924 .00 3192298 .00 4682222 1990 - 91 174,646 .00 364,315 .00 538,961 1991 - 92 3142087 .00 1442336 .00 458,423 1992 - 93 3002517 .00 347,994 .00 648,511 1993 - 94 141.737 .00 334,135 .00 475,872 $" 122602035 $ 6,878.00 $ 11728,493 $ .00 $ 2,995,406 Projected average budget needs of 1518,000 annually should be sufficient to sustain the City's current preventive maintenance program while, at the same time, substantially reducing the City's maintenance backlog. At this level of funding the overall condition of the City's pavement network will remain relatively stable, showing only a slight decrease from an average PCR of 175 in 1988 to a PCR of 171 in 1993-94. However, if the current funding level of $370,000 (inflated at 5% annually) is maintained, the average PCR will decrease to 137 by 1993-94. In addition, the City would be looking at a maintenance backlog of $1.5 million which would be the cost of restoring. the system to its present level of service (average PCR of 175). The PMS Reports In addition to the annual budgets, this report contains a comprehensive and complementary assemblage of pavement management reports generated through BSI's Pavement Management System (PMS) software, ranging from detailed condition assessments to annual maintenance, rehabilitation and reconstruction schedules. Collectively as well as individually, these PMS reports represent reasonable projections of pavement maintenance needs and performance based on visual condition assessments, unit cost estimates, pavement deterioration models and selected maintenance strategies. 3 It is important to note that pavement segment dimensions and surface area, along with the action and repair costs, as presented on the PMS reports, are accurate within reasonable limits. This is noteworthy due to the "implied" accuracy of reporting length and width to the nearest foot, surface area to the nearest square yard, and action and repair unit costs and project estimates to the nearest penny and dollar, respectively. Recommendations The overall effectiveness of the City's PMS will be a function of user commitment, modifying current construction maintenance practices, and effective utilization of the system's expansibility. Securing and maintaining a desired level of pavement performance on a network scale, while at the same time, minimizing annual maintenance and rehabilitation costs will require an on-going commitment to the City's PMS by administrators, maintenance personnel, and system operators. Administrators will need to aggressively pursue alternative financing sources to fund the multi-year preventive maintenance program presented herein and substantially reduce or eliminate the City's current backlog of badly deteriorated pavements. It is also imperative that the entire pavement network be reinventoried every three (3) to four (4) years, and all -necessary data file updates are performed whenever changes are made to the unit cost data, actions and repairs, scheduling scenarios, etc. Modifying current maintenance practices and policies will ' also help to ensure the ultimate success of the City's PMS. Specifically, it is recommended that the City routinely perform all necessary road repairs prior to major maintenance and rehabilitation treatments, and develop comprehensive pavement design and construction specifications along with thorough inspection and quality control procedures. In addition, it is recommended that project -level analyses (e.g., pavement deflections, structural component material sampling and testing, etc.) continue to be performed prior to selection of final major maintenance and rehabilitation candidates and treatments. Finally, the flexibility and versatility of the City's PMS will enable the City to readily upgrade and enhance its system to satisy new and changing pavement management needs. The City may wish to consider integrating its PMS with one or more additional infrastructure management modules (most particularly with a curb, gutter and sidewalk module), an automated mapping system, and/or a computerized work order and job costing program. 4