Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1967 11 06 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL November 6, 1967 CALL TO Meeting called to oz~er at 7:33 P.M. by Mayor Mack. ORDER II. PLEDGE OF Led by Mayor Mack. ALLEGIANCE III. INVOCATION Given by Councilman Klingelhofer. IV. ROLL Present: Councilmen: Mack, Klingelhofer, Coco, Miller, CALL Ring Absent: Councilmen: None Others Present: City Administrator Harry Gill City Attorney James Rourke City Clerk Ruth Poe Planning Director James Supinger V. APPROVAL Moved by Coco, seconded by Klinqelhofer that minute~ OF MINUTES of October 16th meeting be approved as mailed. Carried. vI. PUBLIC 1. AMENDMENT TO LEASE - BOYS' CLUB OF TUSTIN HEARINGS Hearing opened at 7:35 P.M. Mr. VerLyn Jensen spoke on behalf of the Boys' Club clarifying lthe site presently leased and the land requested. He stated that there is an indication by the Board of Directors of the Boys' Club of Tustin showing a willingness to enter into some type of a mixed lease agreement whereby the land east of the building site as shown in the rendering labeled Exhibit C-2 could be on a shorter term lease such as a one or two year lease and the amount now leased be set aside to build upon. In answer to questioning by Councilman Miller, Mr. Jensen stated that perhaps an arrangement could be worked out whereby the land they are asking to be added could be on a different arrangement than that of the original lease. In that way, retain what they have on a long lease and the balance on a short term. If a short term, they would request a two to~five year lease. There being no further comments and no objections, the hearing was declared closed at 7:40 P.M. Councilman Coco stated that the Council's concern is not only to provide a place for boys in the age bracket, but the Council's responsibility to the citizens as a whole. Whether to lease to the Boys' Club has been determined, and they are going to have a one acre lease. If we are to move this over for the request of the Boys' Club and entertain a short term lease on the open area that normally is used by the rest of the 7itizenry, he said he would rather see a relatively short term lease, specifically in terms of one year Council Minutes 11/6/67 . Pg. 2 for at least a few years. This would give the Council a chance to evaluate the usage of this land by the rest of the community. He felt sure there would be no restriqt~ve use of the property, but it is the duty of the Council tosee that the usage by other than the Boys' Club is maintained. He stated he would be in favor of granting the Boys' Club request for a resituation of their acre parcel with the provision that in addition to the 50 year lease, there be a one year lease on the ball park area. This lease can be re-evaluated periodically. Moved by Coco, seconded by Klingelhofer, that the City Attorney draft such a combination lease arrange- ment ~ a long term lease for the Boys' Club site and a shorter term lease in the amount of one year for the open ball park area as shown on Plan C-2 with the provision that the Boys' Club will develop and maintain the areas under lease. A discussion followed as to the location and area for the leases. The staff is to write the correct legal description of approximately one acre per lease parcel to be presented to the Council with the lease papers. Above motion carried. 2. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 372 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 157, ZONING ORDINANCE, RELATING TO DAY NURSERIES AND NURSERY SCHOOLS. (Ccnt'd. from 10/16/67) As requested by the Council, Mr. Supinger explained that the reasons this had been brought up was because the Planning Department had been receiving inquiries as to the locations of day nurseries and, because of these inquiries, they had done a study which resulted in their feeling that there needed to be a change in the Ordinance. Prior to presenting the ch~ges to the Planning Commission, a specific reques came regarding the location of a day nursery in an E-4 District° The proposed Or~in "ce would permit day nurseries in Residential Districts and will establish regulations for these uses. Mr. Supinger said that it may not be usual to permit day nurseries in Residential Districts, but knew of other cities which do it. He further stated that he could see no changes brought about in the Sign Ordinance. There being no comments or objections, the hearing was declared closed at 7:43 P.M. After discussion by the Council as to the desired ~ areas for day nurserxes and the control afforded by a Use Permit, it was ~pved by Ring, seconded b~ Coco that Ordinance No. 372 omitting Sections 4.2 and 4.3 under Sections 3and 4, have f~rst reading by title only. Council Minutes 11/6/67 Pg. 3 In answer to Councilman Ring, Mr. Supinger said that the Zoning Ordinance does not permit issuance of a Variance for a use not permitted in a district. 21r. Gill suggested that the Council might like to consider sending this Ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Mr. Rourke said he would like time to review this Ordinance. As a unanimous vote is required for a reading by title only, the above motion failed - two Councilmen voting no. Moved by Coco, seconded by Ring that Ordinance No. 372 be referred to the City Attorney for redrafting and the incorporation of suggested deletions in Councilman Ring's motion. Motion carried. Moved by Ring, seconded by Coco, that hearing be continued to the next regular meeting. Carried. It was requested that if the staff has more infor- mation or if interested parties in the community have any comments either pro or con, that they present them for consideration. 3. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 374 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 305, SIGN ORDINANCE, AS AMENDED, RELATIVE TO SIGNS ADJACENT TO FREEWAY OFF-RAMPS. Hearing opened at 8:25 P.M. History and recommendations of the Planning Commission were presented by Mr. Supinger. There being no comments or objections, the hearing was declared closed. In answer to questions by Councilman Miller, Mr. Supinger stated that the Commission felt that based ~ on Council action regarding the application of Mr. Wilde, they should not go into standards and decided to consider only the number of signs. Councilman Miller stated that as so much time and effort had gone into the Sign Ordinance, he would be reluctant to do anything at this time. Moved by Miller, seconded by Ring, that the Sign Ordinance be left as is and the Councill move on to the next item of business. Councilman Coco stated that with no more background than the Council has, the Council would be opening a Pandora's Box which need not be opened at this time. The Commission has a flexibility in excessive height and area limitations, and we are now vesting them with another area of flexibility in the number. The Ceuncil has asked for transcripts of all Planning Commission hearings and, although this was not all discussed at an open hearing and was an informal discussion, it was Council Minutes 11/6/67 Pg~ 4 the intent that something in the nature of the transcript called for at public hearings be pre- sented in cases such as this. The Council now has nothing other than the vote of the Commission to justify extension of their powers in the realm of number besides height and area. Above motiQn carried. 4. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 375 - AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 305 SIGN ORDINANCE, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO SIGNS IN PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICTS. Hearing opened at 8~32 P.M. Staff report and recommendations of the Planning Commission presented by Mr. Supinger. There being no comments or objections, the hearing was declared closed at 8:34 P.M. Councilman Coco stated that this was a similar situation to the previous hearing and the Council has no background. However, he felt it differed on the grounds that the Council is asking to continue with the intent of the Planned Community district and that is flexibility. And as we have extended the flexibility in zoning, it is only natural that we extend it in such things as the sign capabilities. Moved by Coco, seconded by Ring, that Ordinance No. 375 have first reading by tittle only. In answer to Councilman Miller, Mr. Supinger stated the signs anticipated would be signs such as the tour signs and areas set aside for future activities that are used by such l~rge developments as the Irvine Ranch. Our Sign Ordinance refers only to specific types of uses. He did not feel that planned community signs are adequately covered at the pres&nt time. This Ordinance could provide a vehicle where temporary signs could be approved. These signs might be called "community interest" signs and have a maximum size and time, and a requirement for a removal bond. All s~gns would be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. Above motiun carried unanimously. Mayor Mack declared a five minute recess. Meeting reconvened at 8:50 P.M. VII. OLD 1. ORDINANCE NO. 370 - Second reading BUSINESS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING THE TUSTIN TRAFFIC ORDINANCE REGULATING THE USE OF AND TRAFFIC UPON THE STREETS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLACES IN THE CITY, AND THE USE, PARKING AND CONTROL OF VEHICLES THEREON, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 328 AND ALL ORDINANCES AMENDATORY THEREOF, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 1964 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM TRAFFIC ORDINANCE OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES. Council Minutes 11/6/67 Pg. 5 Councilman Miller asked that Chief Sissel explain portions relating to bicycle licensing and the reason for yearly renewal. Chief Sissel stated that consideration had been given to licensing every two ~ears, but would not want to go any further than two years. If more than that, they would lose control on bicycles as people would give them away or sell them and new owners would not transfer the license. At present, he said, helwould like to see it remain on a yearly basis. Mayor Mack stated that one of the points of licensing bicycles is to teach a child responsibility. He is going to ride on public streets and must learn to abide by laws. They should be kept mindful of their responsibility. This is in addition to the license function of identification in finding lost bikes and in case of accidents. Chief Sissel stated that it is not necessary~to bring a bicycle in for renewal. An adult may come .to the station and renew the license. Mr. Gill stated that the City is not getting licenses on nearly the amount of bicycles in the City. The Fire Department is setting up licensihg shops at schools and will do this on an annual basis. Moved/ by Klingelhofer, seconded by Ring that Ordinance No. 370 have second reading by title only. Cazried unanimously. Moved by Ring, seconded by Klingelhofer that Ordinance No. 370, adopting the Tus[in Traffic Ordinanc~i'~ Uniform Traffic Ordinance of the League of California Cities, be passed and adopted. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Mack, Klingelhofer, Coco, Mila.er, Ring. Noes: None. Absent: None. 2. ORDINANCE NO, 373 Second reading AN ORDINANCE OF TtIE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATIVE TO LICENSING OF ENTERTAINERS. Moved by Klingelhofer, seconded by Ring that Ordinance No. 373, relative to licensing of entertamners, have second reading by title only. Carried unanxmously. Moved by Ring, seconded by Miller that Ordinance No. 373~ relative to licensing of entertainers, be p~ssed and adopted. Carried by roll call. Ayes.i' Mack, Klingelhofer, Coco, Miller, Ring. Noes: None. Absent: None. 3. RESOLUTIONS OF COMMENDATION 1. RESOLUTION NO. 912 A RESOLTUION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING EDWARD BERING. MOV~ by ~liller, seconded bV Coco that Resolution No. 912 be read in its entirety. Carried. Council Minut~ 11/6/67 Pg. 6 ~eY.ed_b~_~!~g.~_s_~qoD_~ed bY Miller that Resolution No. 912, commending Edward Bering, be passed and .~dopted. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Mack, Klingelhofer, Coco, Miller, Ring. Noes: None. Absent: None. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 911 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING HARRY A. BRAND, JR. ~,~oved by Coco, seconded by Ring that Resolution No, 911 be read bv title only. Carried unanimously. Moved by Ring, seconded bv [(linqelhofer that Resolution No. 911, commending Harry A. Brand, Jr.~ be passed and adopted. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Mack, Klingethoferl Coco, Miller, Ring. Noes: None. Absent: None. 4. CIVIC CENTER SITE ACQUISITION Property located at Northwest corner of Main and "H" Streets. Councilman Coco commended Mr. Gill on his very thorough report. Moved by Coco, seconded by Klingelhofer that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute supplemental escrow instructions approving __ legal description and conditions and that deposit of $59,500 in Escrow No. 875510-HRB be authorized under provisions of th~'ea~ro~ instructions° In answer to ~uestioning by Councilman Ring, Mr. Gill stated that this is strictly land acquisition and could be used for any facility at any given t~me. Councilman Coco stated that whatever the Council does from this point on, they certainly want the cooperation of the citizens and the people in the surrounding area. He said he would like to see the Council consider the appointment of a committee of interested people similar to the General Plan Committee ~n the area and in the City to work with the City and ace as a sounding board to the City staff in the same way the General Plan Committee so successfully carried through the General Plan to the Board of Supervisors. Above motion carried unanimously. 5. U.S. SENATE BILL 1306 - Bank of America request for endorsement of bill to permit banks to underwrite municipal bonds. Councilman Ring questioned whether or not this bill has already been voted upon by the Senate. Moved by Klingelhofer, seconded by Miller that i~ it is still appropriate that we indicate our endorsement of Senate Bill 1306 and so communicate this endorsement to persons requested. Council Minutes 11/6/67 Pg. 7 Councilman Rinq stated that he hoped by this action we are endorsing the Senate bill and not endorsing a particular financial institution or given industry. It is a competitive advantage to the_ cities and is a self interest rather than an interest in any g~ven ~ndustry. Above motion carried. VIII. NEW 1. ORDINANCE NO. 377 BUSINESS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATIVE TO ANIMALS AND FOWL. Mr. Rourke stated that there are further considerations the staff would like to give this matter before this Ordinance is acted upon by the Council, and asked that this matter be continued to the next meeting. Moved by Ring, seconded by Miller that Ordinance No. 377 be deferred to the next regular meeting. Carried. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 906 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WILLIAMS STREET BETWEEN MCFADDEN STREET AND MAIN STREET, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO AD- VERTISE FOR BIDS. Moved by Miller, seconded b7 Klingelhofer that Resolution Noo 906 be read by title only. Carried unanimously. Moved by Miller, seconded by Klingelhofer that Resolution No. 906, approving plans and specifications for improvement of Williams Street between McFadden and Main Streets, and authorizing advertising for bids, be passed and adopted. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Mack, Klingelhofer, Coco, Miller, Ring. Noes: None. Absent: None. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 907 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN INITIATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN TO ANNEX TO SAID CITY CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND DESIGNATED AS "NEWPORT AVENUE- MYRTLE AVENUE ANNEXATION" TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION. Moved by Coco, seconded by Ring that Resolution No. 907 be read by title only. Carried u.nanimously. Moved by Ring, seconded by Cocor that Resolution No. 907 initiating proceedings for Newport Avenue-Myrtle Avenue Annexation, be passed and adopted . Carried by roll call Ayes: Mack, Coco, Miller, Ring. Noes: None. Absent: None. Abstained: Klingelhofer. Council Minutes 11/6/67 Pg. 8 4. RESOLUTION NO. 908 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, PETITIONING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO CANCEL TAXES. Moved by Ring, seconded by [4iller, that Resolution Noo 908 be read by title onlyo Carried.unanimously. Moved by Klingelhofer, seconded by Ring that Resolution No. 908, petitioning the Board of Supervisors to cancel taxes, be passed and adopted. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Mack, Klingelhofer, Coco, Miller, Ring° Noes: None. Absent: None. It was explained that this is cancellation on City owned property at Second and "C" Streets. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 909 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AND SUBMITTING A BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES. Moved by Klingelhofer, seconded by Coco that Resolution No. 909 be read by title onlyo Carried unanimously. __ Moved by Coco, seconded by Klingelhofer that Resolution No. 909, adopting and submitting a budget for expenditure of funds allocated from the State Highway Fund to Cities, be passed and adopted. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Mack, Klingelhofer, Coco, Miller, Ring. Noes: None. Absent: None. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 910 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AND SUBMITTING A BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF STATE ALLOCATED (ENGINEERING) FUNDS. Moved by Coco, seconded by Ring that Resolution No. 910 be read by title only. Carried unanimously. Moved by Ring, seconded by Klingelhofer that Resolution No. 910, adopting and submitting a budget for the expenditure of State allocated (Engineering) funds, be passed and adopted. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Mack, Klingelhofer, Coco, Miller, Ring. Noes: None. Absent: None. 7. APPROVAL OF LANDSCAPING AGREEMENT ON WARNER AVENUE WITH THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Councilman Miller asked if this would look basically like the median on Edinger in Santa Ana and was told it would have the same ground cover but would have uniform trees° Council,~qinutes 11,/6/67 Pg~ 9 Moved by Klingelhofer, seconded by Miller that the agreement for landscaping on Warner Avenue from the Newport Freeway to Red Hill Avenue with the City of Santa Ana be approved and the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute said agreement. Carrled~ 8. IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT ANNEXATION Mr. Gill referred to proposed letter to be submitted to Rear Admiral Dorn~n stating that the City has no objections to the possible annexation of the Marine Corps Air Station and the Air Facility to the Irvlne Ranch Water District. Neither facility is zn a water district, although a portion of the Air Facility is in the Tustin Water District. No water is being served to them by this District. Mr. Gill stated that he had talked to the Tustin Water Works and they have no objections to this move by the Irvine Ranch Water District. If approved, this District would encompass both Marine Corps facilities and would be the governing agency for serving water te the Navy provided that the present Metropolitan Water District direct water system is abandoned or transferred to some other governing agency. Mr. Gill said he believed thi's to be in the best interest of the City of Tustin. The Board of Directors of the Irvine Ranch Water District will vote on this November 8th. If they approve, it will be filed with the Local Agency ~ Formation Commission on December 13th, which is the same date as our annexation hearing by LAFC of the Air Facility. Our indication, with cop~es to the Irvine Company, supporting the Irvine Ranch Water District in this matter will be in the City's best interest. Mr. Gill requested an endorsement by the Council for two reasons - to alert the Council to this matter and the fact that this would take away a small portion of the Tustin Water Works District. Presently a portion Of the Irvine Ranch Water District north of the base (the 200 acre Irvine Development) as well as some of the area west of Red Hill is in the Irvlne Ranch Water District being served by the Tustin Water Works. It is conceivable that any area of the District could be served by the Tustin Water Works. There are still areas north of the base which the District and the Water Works are working out now as to the mutual interest of both. Moved by Coco, seconded by Klingelhofer, that the City of Tustin express no objection to possible annexation of the Marine Corps Air Station and the Marine Corps Air Facility to the Irvine Ranch Wate~ District for the purpose of supplying'water to these facilities providing that the Department of Navy.deems that such annexation would not be detrimental to the Navy. Carried. Council Minu~'~ 11/6/67 Pg. 10 9. FINAL MAP - TRACT NO. 6275 located west side of'Yorba Str&~t, n6rth of Prelude Homes and just southerly of the Enderle property. Moved by Miller, seconded by Coco that Final Map of Tract NOo 6275 be approved and the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary documents. Motion carried - Councilman .Ring ab- stained. 10. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE POLICE UNIT Mr. Gill informed the Council that sealed bids had been opened. It is recommended that the low bid of Santa Ana Lincoln Mercury be accepted. This action must receive Council approval as it is over $2,500.00. In answer to questioning by Councilman Ring, Mr. Gill stated that most equipment such as radios, lights, screening, etc., is transferred from one car to another, however certain things are built into a police unit specially such as motor, shocks, etc., that come with the car. Moved by Coco, seconded by Ring that the City Admin- istrator be authorized to purchase the low bid of one 1968 Mercury Police unit at a total price of $3,008.35. Carried. 11. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS Councilman Ring asked that the City Administrator bring Planning Commissioners mileage reports to the next regular meeting. Moved by Miller, seconded by Coco that demands in the amount of $43,305.42 be approved ~n~ paid. Carried. IX. OTHER 1. CITY ADMINISTRATOR BUSINESS 1. Flood Control Correspondence Mr. Gill referred to the letter to the Flood Control District continued from last meeting, and stated that the particular matter of concern at that time involved~a tract north of Walnut. This has been heard by the County Planning Commission, and the County has required a drain on the property north of the irvine development. The letter really has no value at this time relative to the drain unless the Council desires other comments to be made relative to the letter from the Flood Control District. Councilman Coco stated that'he felt that the Council should respond to these comments written by the employees of the County, employees of any other City, employees of any governmental agency when written in this manner, and whether or not the drainage matter is a fait accompli at this time doesn't really make that much difference. .The letter does have use and the City should Council Minutes 11/6/67 Pg~ 11 register their dissatisfaction with this communication. Councilman Coco felt that the Council should authorize the sending of this letter, not only to Mr~ Osborne, the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission, but also to the original recipients of the original letter by Mro Nelson, namely the Irvine Company, R. H~ Grant Company, and Hall-Haynes and Foreman. Mayor Mack agreed 100% with Councilman Coco and stated that he would like to be in attendance at the Executive Board meeEing of the League to register a complaint with the Executive Officers of the League of California Cities, Orange County branch, that this flow of correspondence from the employees of the County of Orange is ~etting to be a steady thing. Particularly, it seems to be aimed at the City of Tustin and trying to stop in some way any annexation efforts that this City has tried ~o make. Mayor Mack felt that the City should register a complaint and ask for support from the other cities of the County. Councilman Miller felt that the same things could be said and accomplish more if stated differently and not put it in such a strong manner. Councilman Klingethofer stated that he did not feel that a hostile approach is going to accomplish what we want. He did not think it is going to resolve the problem for a continued or improved relationship. A hostile manner will tend to aggrevate everyone. He'felt that there might be some good come from working through the League of Cities. After further discussion, the following action was taken. Moved by Coco, seconded by Ring that the letter to Mr. Osborne of the Orange County Flood Control District be sent as written. Motion carried - Councilmen Miller and Klingelhofer voting no. Councilman Coco noted that coples of this letter are to go to the Irvine Company, R. Grant Company, and Hall-Haynes and Foreman as well as the Board Of Supervisors and the County Planning Commission. Mayor Mack asked that a copy of the letter be given to the Council to take with them the League meeting. 2. Resolutions- Newport HarborsHigh School Mr. Gill referred to the Resolution from Newport Harbor High School offering assistance in the recent fire disaster. Council MinUtes 11/6/67 Pg. 12 It was directed that a letter of appreciation be sent to the Newport Harbor High School District. 3.Commendation - City Personnel involved in recent disaster LetteT of commendation from Mr. Gill to the City employees who participated in the recent fire disaster presented to the Council. Mayor Mack directed that the City Attorney draft a Resolution commending all City personnel involved in the recent disaster. 4. Marine Corps Birthday Celebration Mro Gill reminded everyone of the r,iarine Corps celebrations this week including the event at the High School Tuesday morning at 9:30 A.M. and the luncheon at the Revere House Wednesday noon. 2.CITY ATTORNEY None X. INFORMATION 1. Personnel Activity Roster - H. Gill AND 2. Letters regarding Tax Sharing from: CORRESPONDENCE J. Califano Special Assistant to the President Robert Geier - Admin. Assistant - James Utt John McCormack - House of Representatives 3. Proclamation to U. S. Marine Corps and schedule of events. 4. Reports on 69th Annual League Conference - Mayor Mack, J. Supinger, and H. Gill 5. Report on Presentation of Municipal Accounting Award and letter of congratulations from G. Whittaker, City of Campbell. 6. "Computerized Payroll Pays Dividends for City Government" - w~itten by H. Gill - published in October ~ssue of Western City Magazine- 7. Letter of appreciation for Beautification Award - Ed Nahigan 8. Resolution of Legislative Affairs Committee - Tustin Chamber Of Commerce 9. MacKnight vs. Tustin - James Rourke 10. Commending Tustin Law Enforcement Post Explorer Scouts - Go Calamaras, Vice President, Leland Oliver Co., Inc. 11. Traffic Signal at Newport and McFadden - Director of Public Works, Wm. Hirstein, A.S. Koch, Argyros and Frank 12. Letter of Appreciation - General W. G. Thrash 13. Letter relative to Orange County Celebrity Golf Classic Proclamation - City of Costa Mesa 14. Orange County Tax Rate compilation - The Register 15. Building Department monthly report Council Minutes 11/6/67 Pg. 13 XI. OTHER 1. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Chamber of Commerce Resolution Councilman Coco stated that he had been appointed to work with a sub-committee of the Chamber of Commerce on the subject of eligibility requirements for Planning Commission members. COuncilman Coco said that he had met with Mr. VerLyn Jensen and there is in the Council folders a Resolution of the Legislative Committee of the Tustin Chamber and this is in substantial agreement with the conclusions that he and Mr.Jensen had. He suggested that the Council put this on the calendar for Council discussion. This has evidently been brought up before the ~ Chamber as a whole with the possibility of minor changes here and there in the phrasing to make sections a and b 'grammatically con- sistento Councilman Miller asked if there were not areas within the Tustin Elementary School District that are in the City of Santa Ana. Councilman Coco said that this is correct. The intent of restricting the Planning Commission members to the Tustin Elementary School District was to avoid the possibility of any real absentee ownership. It is true that portions of the District are in the City of Santa Anao If an applicant resided in Santa Ana and the Tustin School District, we would consider his application providing that he owned substantial real property or business · ~ interest in the City of Tustino Mayor Mack felt that the wording at the discretion of the City Council.takes care of any situation along this line. The Council discussed further s.~me of the pros and cons and interpretations of this Resolution° Moved by Coco, seconded by Ring that the City Attorney draft a proposed amendment and a public hearing date be set on this matter. Motion corried. 'Councilmen Klingelhofer and Miller voting no. Mayor Mack declared the open portion of this meeting closed for a personnel session. Present COuncilmen Mack, Klingelhofer, Coco, Miller, Ring; City Attorney Rourke and City Administrator Gill. *~* SEE CORRECTION IN MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 20, 1967 11/6/67 Pgo 14 XII. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Ring, seconded by Coco that meeting be adjourned. Carried°