HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1967 05 15 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
May 15, 1967
I.
CALL TO Meeting called to order at 7:35 by Mayor Mack.
ORDER
II.
PLEDGE OF Led by Mayor Mack
ALLEGIANCE
II.
ROLL Present: Councilmen: Mack, Klingelhofer, Coco, Miller
CALL Absent: Councilmen: Ring
Others Present: City Administrator Harry E. Gill
City Attorney James G. Rourke
City Clerk Ruth C. Poe
Planning Director James Supinger
IV.
APPROVAL
OF MINUTES
V.
PUBLIC 1. ZC 67.153 - KAL-SOUTH DEVELOPMEMT CORP.
HEARINGS
Application to re-classify approximately 7.52 acres from
PD (Planned Development) District to PD-2700 (2700 Square
feet of lot area per dwelling unit). Site fronts 663 feet
on the East side of Williams St., approx. 1330 feet North
McFadden Ave.
Hearing opened at 7:36 P.M.
Mr. Supinger presented staff reportland the recommendations
of 'the Planning COmmission that this ZC be approved for'the
following reasons. -.
1. The proposed rezoning conforms to the Tustin Area
General Plan relative to land use and proposed a
considerably lower density than is suggested by
the Plan.
2. The density of the proposed development is comparable
to the density of other projects in the area.
3. Vacancy rates in the area are vary low.
4. As additional grounds, the minutes and evidence
inuroduced at the April l0 and April 24 Planning
Commission meetings are included and made a part
of the motion.
Mr. Erwin Uinesuff, Secretary Treasurer for Kal-South
Development Corp. spoke on behalf of the applicant.
Mr. Uinesuff stated this proposed project consisting of
ll9 units in a garden complex, located on Williams St.
between McFadden and Main St. proposes just over 16 units
per acre. According to the City General Plan this could
be as much as 30+ units per acre. Project is wholly
contained as far as recreation and parking, and green
areas to meeu city requirements.
Charles Greenwood, 366 E. First St. Tustin stated that he
felt the staff report thoroughly explained the project but
that he would be glad to answer any of the Council's
questions.
There being no protests or further comments the hearing
was declared closed at 7:40 P.M.
Council Minutes
Page 2
Hearings continued 5/15/67
Councilman Hiller commented on the fact that a few years
ago there was a controversy over apartment developments
because there was no General Plan and people said when such
plan was adopted they would go along with it. This is in
accordance with the General Plan. And this development,
if zone is approved, will come up for a Use PerLuit.
Moved by Hiller, seconded by Klingelhofer that the zoning
be adopted as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Hotion carried unanimously.
2. VARIANCE 67 - 183 UNITED CALIFORNIA, BANK - APPEAL
Appeal of the decision of ~he Tustin Planning Commission
denying Variance IIo. 67-183 of United California Bank to
permit the erection of a pole sign in addition to the
existing sign identifying a c.ommercla! complex. Proposed
sign Hould be double sided, 8' X 24, and have a height
of 34'. Site location is on the South side of Fourth St.
at the intersection of Fourth & Irvine Blvd.
Staff report presented by Hr. Supinger.
Mr. Lee Hasenjeager Vice President of United California Bank
spoke on behalf of applicant stating that rules, if good
rules and regulations, should not be so inflexible that
exceptions cannot be made when they appear to be justified
and he felt this to be such a situation for the following
reasons.
Only objection that has been made has been by
competitor.
2. Property owners of the Center are urging that this
variance be granted.
3. No one else in area has raised any objections.
Mr. Hasenjeager introduced members of UCB Staff:
Hr. John Greenwood, Bob Meyer, and Don Sinclair.
Hr. Don Sinclair Vice President of UCB, Los Angeles stated
that UCB is asking to construct a tower sign although one
exists in the complex. Feel definite need for this type of
sign as 3 other Tustin Banks have.tower signs~
There being no objections or further comments the hearing
was declared cIosed at 7:48 P.II.
In answer to questioning by Coucilman Coco, Mr. Sinclair
stated that he and the architect had spent some time with
Hr. Supinger at the early stages of the development and
that they were aware of the sign requirements but thouglUt
they could go along and adhere to the code, but the architect
in his efforts to give a very handsome building was unable
to design the building to accommodate any signs directly
on the building.
Councilman Klingelhofer mentioned that if every business
in this particular Center would wish to have the privilege
that UCB is asking - if you have it why not every one sort
of thing - the aesthetics might be more adversely off acted.
Perhaps the whole Center 'might be adversely effected.
Mr. Sinclair stated that most retail stores have similar
signs, but of the Banks in the City, they all have to~.~er
signs in addition to any Center sign., UCB is asking for
this sign so as to be competitive with other Danks.
Councilman Coco asked iir. Sinclair if he felt that the UCB
si getting a sl~0rter shrift than other banks under this
Sign OMits%co.. There are no other banks under the sign
ordinance that have anymore of a privilege than UCB is
asking for.
Council iiinutes
Hearings continued Pg- 3
5/15/6 7
Mr. Sinclair stated that if UCB is confined to the Ordinance
that they will not be afforded the same sign privileges.
Councilman Coco stated that B of A and First Western were
established before the present Sign Ordinance. The
Saddleback Bank conforms to a provision that allows for
a corner and is the reason for. the two signs. There is
nothing in the Ordinance that would call for UCB to be
mn a hardship situation in that regard.
Mr. Sinclair stated that in the strict sense of the Code
that's probably true but if UCB does not have the type of
sign applied for he feels they are being prejudiced. He
also stated that the only place a wall smgn would bo
comparable with the architecture is on the side facing
stores and shopping center which is not the important
side for identification.
Answermng further questioning by Iir. Coco, IIr. Sinclair
said there is a certamn amount of transient business in
banking. People bank with the closest bank. Also UCB
signs are a corporate identity and it is important so people
can find the bank by seeing it on tower. People do, by
nature, bank in the closest bank to them but people moving
around as they do in California are the ones they want to
announce their location to..
In answer to questioning by Mr. Miller regarding UCB
located by the Orange Airport, Mr. Sinclair said that the
City of Hewport Beach and the owner and the Irvines were
against a tower sign but they felt this to be a different
type of building and different situation as the building
and sign on South side were so prominent but, ,they have
recamved permission to erect Emblem on the street.
Councilman Coco asked about architecture'of building and
rms told that all UCB architecture is not alike although
floor plans are almost identical. The architect in this
case was aware of the Ordinance but is aesthetically minded
and steers away from signs.
Mr. Rourke, in answer to questions of iiayor iiack, stated
that if granted as a varmance this could tend to be
considered a green light for other termants in the complex
to nave a variance from provisions of the sign ordinance
but he could not say flatly that it would. In order to
grant this variance you would have to find the determinations
described in the 0rdinancee as to special hardships etc.
Councilman Miller asked if the substance of this application
or appeal are any different from that of the Sizzling
Broiler and Mr. Rourke stated he felt that some facts are
a little bit dffferent but that it is a vary similar kind
of problem.
Councilman Coco stated that people do not tend to object
'before the physical fact, but comolaints do come in after.
There is now a non-conforming Bay'Sign in the Tustin Heights
Center but it is there and was erected before the new Sign
Ordinance. These things do exist unless they have some
measure of control. In regard to UCB application, the
architect dii secure a copy of the Sign 0rdinancc and was
familiar with its provisions before he began his work.
Moved by Coco, seconded by Klingelhofer that denial of
the Planning Commission be upheld. Carried by Roll Call.
Ayes: Mack, KlngellhoI'er, Coco, Miller. Noes: None.
Absent: Ring.
Council Minutes
Pg. 4
. 5/15/67
VI.
0LD 1. a) RENTAL AGREEMENT FOR BUILDING AT 275 SOUTH
BUSINESS "C" ST., TUSTIN (CORNER OF SOUTH "C" & THIRD)
Moved by Miller, seconded by Coco that the rental agreement
for building at 275 South 'C" St. be approved and the
Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute this
agreement. Carried.
Mr. Gill stated he felt there would be no objections to
a small sign identifying the Chambers such as that on
City Hall.
b) ORDINANCE NO. 351
AN 0RDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING SECTION 2-7 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE
RELATIVE TO THE MEETING PLACE OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
t~o-. 15.~ have second reading by title only. Carried
unanimously.
Moved by Klingelhofer, seconded by Coco that Ordinance
NO 351, amending section 2-7 of the City Council
to the meeting place of the City Council, be oassed and
adopted. Carried by roll call. Ayes: Mack, Klingelhofer,
Coco and Miller
. Noes: None. Absent: Ring.
Mr. Gill stated that it was felt that we would move in
with a minimum amount of effort and try the meeting
place out for awhile. It may be well to test it to' see
if we could conduct a meeting possibly without microphones
initially rather than moving this equipment. The purchase
of 50 chairs is anticipated.
Mayor Mack announced that the first meeting in the new
location will be the 19th of June,.
2 ORDINANCE NO. 352
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE NO. 157,
AS AMENDED, RELATIVE TO SMALL ANIMAL HOSPITALS,
VETERINARY CLINICS AND KENNELS
Moved by K!ingelhofor, seconded by Coco that 0rainance
No. 352 have second reading by title only.
Mr. Rollen Hahoney of 13661 Wheeler P1., Tustin requested
~ 'tTme to sooak on ~his matteP and stated tha~ he objected
to Section 11.505 as being unfair to the Citizens of the
City. if veterinarians do not feel the are gettin~ the
returns they should when boarding animals they should
raise their ra~es. In answering IIr. Coco, Mr. ilahoney
said he had made use of the existing veterinarian facilities
for boarding his dogs and that there is not a kennel in
the City.
Mr. Su in er stated that basically ~his Ordinance is to
~zone that these can be mn and what can go
on in that zone.
Mr. Miller stated that his understanding is that there
are ~ iones that we feel boarding would be appropriate
and we make a distinction in this ordinance 'as to which
zones boarding would b8 .pemitte~.
Mr. Supingor said t!!at Nr. ililler's statement is correct
anal that th~ present zone for boardin is the R-A zone.
Kennels for extended boarding should ~e in either an
agricultural or industrial zone as dogs kept for any
length of time should be permitted to go outside. This
does not belong in a Commercial District. Consequently
most Ordinances restrict kennels with outside runs to
Council Minutes
Old Business Continued Yl 6
5 5/7
those districts. There are kelmels close by, but not
in Tustil~.,- In our zoning Ordinance ~e p~rmit kennels
only ia an R-A zone anC. the only R-A zoning at the prcsen~
time is at Dryan and Broadening ~vhich is occupied by an
electrical sub .station. A kennel could go into a U zone
~.~ith a Use i~cr~.~it. If this Ordinance is passed it ~.~ould
prohibit even an existing Veterinarian Hospital from
the boarding of animals other than for Medical reasons.
Ans~.~ering a question by Councilman ~,~iller, iTr. SupAnger
stated tha~ outside runs arc provided at kennels as they
realize the animals nccd outside sunlight e~c. The only
other control ~'~ould be the animal control Ordinance and
the SPCt regulates the construction of Kennels and
approve the plans.
!it. ~.~.iller stated he felt the Ordinance as no~ ~'~ritten
~'~ould stand in performance task even if the Section 11.505
~vere stricken because of clause Stating all animals shall
be kept in an enclosed a~r conditioned, sound proof
structure. If there is the regulation tha~ all ani~als
to be boarded must have runs, there ~s no ~.~ay for the
creation of a nuisance. If only concerned v~ith the
nuisance ~o the community then Section 5.075-C and the
last sentence of the definition could be stricken.
Councilman Coco felt that there had been some good points
presented and thanked Hr. Hahoney for bringing them to
the CounQils a~en~iOn. ~r. Coco stated that unless
there is an ovcr~'~helming reason that has not been presented
he agreed ~'~ith Hr. Hillsr and is in favor of striking
this provision.
Councilman Miller said that there may be some prohibition
against using a ~totally enclosed space as a kennel and
perhaps this Ordinance should be held over until this
can be investigated.
[ir. Rourke said that a hearing ~.~ould have to be noticed
if there are any substantial changes.
Preceding motion to have second reading of Ordinance 352
~Qiied.
Hoved ~y Coco~ seconded by Klingelhofer that this item
be continued for a s~udy of other existing legislation
as regards kennels an~ the general question of boarding
animals for short periods of tic.me as a service to the
Community and a report to be presented at the next Council
ilceting. Carried.
The Council thanked Hr. Mahoney for his contribution
this evening.
3. ORDINANCE NO. 353
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 157, THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AS AMENDED, RELATIVE TO HEIGHT AND LOCATION OF
FENCES, HEDGES, AND WALLS, AND DEFINITION OF "FRONT
YARD" AND "SIDE YARD".
Hoved by Miller, seconded by~Kl~n~elhofer that Ordinance
referre~ bask to the 31a~ing Commission for further
consideration. Carriei~.
Council itinutes
B e
Old ' usine~s;'Continu d
4. 0RDINANCE NO. 354
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA,
PROVIDING F0R THE REMOVAL OF ABANDONED SIGNS.
Novcd by Coco, seconded .by Hiller that Ordinance Uo. 554
have second reading by title only.
Councilman Klin~elhofer asked the exact definition of
an abandone~d sign?
tit. Supingot stated'an abandoned sign would be any sign
not used for a period of ~0 days or used to advertise
that which has been moved or discontinued from the property.
Mr. Rourke said in his opinion a sign could be abandoned
in one day if the owner left it with some indication that
he was not intending to use it any further although it is
usually a matter of non-use but it could be abandoned in
less than ~0 days. The City could be liable if they
removed a sign and were wrong. The Ordinance does provide
for notice to the ov~ner before anything is done so in any
event it would th~n be incumbent upon the property owner
to give the City some advice disputing the City's position
about it.
f:bove motion carried unanimously.
Hoved by Coco, seconded by Klingelhofer that Ordinance
No. 3~4, providing for the removal of abandoned signs,
be.passed and :adopted° Carried b..Y roll call. Ayes': Hack,
Klingelhofer, Coco, Hille~. Noes: l!one. Absent: ling.
5- RESOLUTION NO. 880
A RESOLUTION 0F THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING MARILYN J. LUDWIG TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION.
iloved b,y Miller, seconded by Klingelhofer that R~sotution
IIo. 880 be read by title only. Carried unanimously.
Moved by Coco, seconded by Klinselhofer that Resolution
'Ilo. 850, appointing Marilyn. J.. Ludwig to the Planning
Commission, be passed and ad_opted. Carried by roll call.
Ayes: Ilack, Klingethofer, Coco, Iiiller. Noes: Uone.
Absent: Ring.
Vii.
i!EW 1. RESOLUTION UO. 879
BUSINESS
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA OF INTENTION TO APPROVE CONTRACT
PROVIDING FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE STATE EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT SYSTEM.
Moved by Klingelhofer, seconded by Hillor that Resolution
No. 879 be_ read by .title onlyj C~rriod unanimously.
Hoved by K!in~elhofer, seconded by IIi ller that Resolution
i!o, 879, of intention to approve contract ~roviding for
participation in the State Employees, Retirement System,
be oassed and adopted. Carried by roll call. Ayes: iiack,
Klingelhofer, Coco, iiiller. iYoes: None. Absent: Ring.
2. REQUEST FROM TILLER DAYS INC. - STREET DANCE
.. ~T FROil TILLER DAYS IiTC .- STREET DAiTCE
iIEQ. UEST FOR PLjIIItIS'SI0iT TO IIOLD .q STREET DAIICE
JtF~y 22 ON iRiN STREET, EAST OF "D" STrlELT
iioved bM ililter, seconded by Klingelhofer that request
of Tuntin Tiller Days for closing of Iiain .Street, east of
Council liinutes
Pg. 7
New Business Continued 5 5/7
/1
D Street for a Street Dance on July 2End be aDproved
subject to final clea_rance by the Police, Fir~, and
Building Departments. Carried
3. TUSTIN CAB CO. - ADDITIONAL CAB PERMITS
REQUEST FOR 6 ADDITIONAL TAXICAB PERMITS AND 3
STANDS AT 555 SOUTH "C" STREET
Mr, Gil_l stated that if request is approved it would
huthorize the cabs that they desire to operate within
the City of Tustin. There were 2 cabs on the initial
application and the business has grown to a total of 8
taxis. They can operate in the County area without
approval of the City, however they would not be able to
pickup wi'thin the City limits but they could discharge
passengers. So, to control any activity that is gemrig
on, the fact that they are permitted to pickup in the
City gives the City the right to inspect the vehicles.
tie could have 21 Tore people dischardod in the City and
the vehicles could be unsafe. This way it would bring
it under City jurisdiction. Ue have had complaints from
c competitive cab company asking that the City not approve
this as they feel it is unfair competition, but this is
a matter between the 2 companies.
Councilman ililler stated he was happy to see that the
Tustin Cab Co. has prospered to where they can add 6
more cabs.
Moved by tilllot, seconded. b~ Klingelhofer that cormits
requested by the T '
usti~ Cab Co. be ,.qranted. Carried.
In answer ~o questioning by iir. Coco, IIr-. Gill said the
only stand will now be on 6th St. This. is their place
of business and room for 3 vehicles on the street.
4; APPROVAL OF DEMANDS
lieveal b,y Klingelhofer seconded by ililler that d~mands
in the amount of (.7.6~7.8~ ~e pai~_~ iiotion carried.
VIII.
OTHER CITY ADMINISTRATOR
BUSINESS
l) IIr. Gill made note of the chance in the ..genda format
stating it would be continued at the pleasure of the Council.
2~ Report on Economic Development Committee
Presented by IIr. Gill
I.ir. Charles Oreem.;qo~]_ explained the history behin~ the
formation of this committee which would evolve from the
present Commercial and Industrial Committee which had
started off with the idea of presenting come sort of an
architectural policy for the Business Districts. After
considerable discussion it was the consensus of opinion
that more thought should be given to what we can really
anticipate in the way of business districts. It was then
decided to broaden the scope of this committee and make
it a cooperative venture between the City, the Chamber
and with Iir. Adsit,s advise to really go into the study
of the type of business growth desired and to then
determine if feasible and economical etc.
F:~r. Gill informed the Council that this is being presented
to the Chamber Board of Directors. The now Chamber
~lanagor will ague on board on or about June 1st to get
mnss the depth of this and lend his talents to it. The
first step is to present this to the Council and the
Board for their reaction. As far as cost the Chamber
ilanaGcrs time and City Administrators time would be in
connection with their nor:ml duties. Iiost of the work
Council Minutes
Dther Busi~eS~gContinued
by members of committee will be at their own cost. The
irvine Co. is very interested and their contributions
will be at their expense. The only other costs would be
with the consultant although most of his work would tie
in with our town center studies anyway. So there may be
little or no additional costs.
Moved b~ Klingelhofer1 seconded by Coco that the City
Council .~dorse the purpose of this Economic Plannin~
Committee and the 5 steps enumerated and give them
support. Carried.
CiTY =.TTORNEY
None
IX.
INFORMATION~ The followrang information and/or correspondence received.
& C0RRESPON,
DENCE 1. Personnel Activity Register - H. Gill
2. Building .Dept. Activity and Permit Reports - F. Brook
3. Legislative Bulletin - League of California Cities
4. Progress Report - Tustin Tiller Days inc.
5. Request for Council Suppor~ - Air California
6. Minutes of Executive and General Meetings - Orange
County League of Cities
7. Digests of Assembly and Senate Bills
8. Resolution supporting A.B. 877 - City of San Juan
Capistrano
X.
OTHER COUNCIL
BUSINESS
1. IIoved b~ Klin~elhofor~ seconded by Iiiller, that
the Council authorize the Mayor to attend the 1967
~nnual Conference of Hayors and ~o be reimbursed for
those necessary expenses incurred. Conference dates
from Juno 17th to June 21st in Hawaii.
Councilman Klingelhofer said he does not believe' that
the City of Tustin ha's ever participated in this before.
There was quite a lengthy presentation at the League,
Orange County Cities a few months ago directed to the
need of representation at this conference and those
conferences in the future. The main purpose being that
Western Cities arc not usually represented and because
of the fact th~:t ilayors in the west often have terms of
office that are only two years in length, it does not
gmve the Western Cities of the U, S, an opportunity to
become" valuable members of conferences and committees.
In the short analysis of the situation the public opinion
that the League of Cities throughout the U. S. and the
Conference of.Iiayors does exert is not really representing
people here.. Councilman Klingelhofer felt it the Councils
responsibility to help and encourage in this particular
effort.
Above motion carried
2. Councilman Hiller requested a personnel meeting
following this meeting,
PUBLIC
None
Council ilinutes
Pg. 9
I 6
51 51 ?
DC I.
ADJOURN Mayor [lack adjourned the open portion of the meeting
MENT to a personnel session.
Present at Personnel Session: Council, City Administrator,
City Attorney, City Clerk.
Moved by Klingelhofer,. seconded by Coco that meeti~g
be adjourned. Carried.
IIayor
Clrk~