HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1967 04 03 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
April 3, 1967
CALL TO Meetihg called to order at 7:32 P.M. by Mayor Mack.
ORDER
II.
PLEDGE OF Led by Mayor Mack.
ALLEGIANCE
III.
ROLL Present: Councilmen: Mack, Klingelhofer, Coco, Miller,
CALL Councilman Ring arrived at 7:37 P.M.
Absent: Councilman: None
Others Present: City Administrator Harry E. Gill
City Attorney James G. Rourke
City Clerk Ruth C. Poe
Planning Director James Supinger
IV.
APPROVAL Moved by Klingelhofer, seconded by Miller that minutes of
OF MINUTES the March 20th meeting be approved as mailed.
Councilman COco asked that the word permissible - page 3,
Item 2 be changed to permissive.
Correction so noted. Motion Carried.
PUBLIC 1. ZC 67-152 - ELIZABETH LA POINTE
HEARINGS
RECLASSIFICATION OF LOTS 2 & 3, TRACT 2187, FROM
C-1 TO C-2. SITE FRONTS APPROXIMATELY 80' ON NORTH
SIDE OF MAIN ST. & APPROXIMATELY 140' ON WEST SIDE
OF PREBLE DRIVE.
Mr. Suplnger presented the staff report and recommendations
from the Planning Commission for approval of ZC 67-152.
Miss Margarete Waits a partner in the business and
Mrs. Kenneth Deisch - owner of building in the area to
be rezoned, stated that they are in favor of rezoning.
There being no further comments or objections the hearing
was declared closed at7:37 P.M.
It was confirmed that there had been no written or oral
protests.
Councilman Ring arrived at 7:37 P.M.
Moved by Coco, seconded by Klingelhofer, that Zone Change
~7-1~2 ~e approved and th~ City Attorney be directed to
draft an Ordinance to that effect. Motion carried.
2. PZ 67-104 - SADDLEBACK MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT
PREZONING TO P.C, (PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT), APPROVAL
OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
FOR AN EIGHTY-SIX BED PROPRIETARY GENERAL CARE HOSPITAL,
WHICH WILL ULTIMATELY CONTAIN 250 BEDS.
SITE FRONTS 330 FEET ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF NEWPORT AVE.
AT MYRTLE AVE. & CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 4.8 ACRES.
Council Minutes
4/3/67 Pg. 2
Rearir~ No. 2 continued.
Mr. Supinger presented background material, together with
the staff report and Planning Commission recommendations.
Hearing opened a~ 7:40 P.M.
Dr. James Casteel of 13420 Newport Ave., spokesman for the
Medical Development group presented the following Doctors
of the group and the background of each: Dr. Allen Holen,
Dr. Donald Donahue, Dr. Louis Galente, Dr. Frank Vellolobos,
Dr. Robert Wiener, Dr. Richard Hayden, Dr. Richard Sellman,
Dr. William Haines, Dr. Melvin Shiffman, Dr. Ernest Ainslee,
and Dr. Earl Kiernan.
Dr. Casteel, Dr. Shiffman, Dr. Kiernsn, and Mr. Bob
Gillman, builder, then spoke in favor of this prezoning
and the Saddleback Medical Development, pointing out the
need for this hospital and existing over capacity, need
for emergency room in the area, why they felt this to be
an excellent location, adequate parking facilities, beauty
of the architecture and landscaping, volume of employment,
adequate housing in the area, additional taxes and pur-
chasing power in the community, effect or lack of effect
of the Hospital Planting Commissions decision as a private
hospital financed by Orivate funds, compliance with Tustin
Fire Department requirements, and the use of small hos-
pitals as satellite hospitals to both large hospitals &
regional medical centers.
Dr. J. Doyle s~oke in favor of the expansion of existing
larger hospitals rather than the building of small private
hospitals.
Mr. C. Mslinowski, Administrator of Santa Aria Community
Hospital, informed the Council of the expansion plans for
Santa Ana Community.
Mr. Paul White - Chairman of the Orange County Ares
Hospital Committee, spoke on the processes followed in
obtaining approval of various governing bodies & costs
of construction & maintenance of a competant institution.
Dr. Robert Dreibelbis - asked to go on record as a private
physician and as an individual in this community that he
is opposed to proprietary hospitals.
Mrs. Robert L. Mason objected to the location of the
hospital on the grounds of noise and traffic in the area.
There being no further comments or objections the hearing
was declared closed at 8:39 P.M.
A discussion by the Council followed at which time questions
were asked of the interested person, both pro & con, as to:
Questions posed by the letter from the president of the
Orange County Medical Society.
Status of expansion of Santa Ana Community Hospital.
Function of the Regional Committee of the Hospital
Planning Associstlon.
Pros & cons of Proprietary verses Non-profit hospitals.
Appropria~ness of the location.
Type of facilities planned for this hospital.
Quality & excellence of service to the community.
Council MinUtes
4/3/67 Pg. 3
Hearing NO. 2 Cont.
Five minute recess called by Mayor.
Meeting reconvened at 9:16 P.M.
Moved by Miller, and duly seconded, that in order to
give this group time to answer questions we continue
this hearing until our next regular meeting.""'Motion
failed. " ' "
Moved by Ring, seconded by Klingelhofer, that PZ 67-104
b~..denied.' Roll call vote call'ed for. Motions'failed
~. Ayes: KlingelhOfer, Ring. Noes= Mack, Coco,
Moved bx Coco, seconded by Ring, that this whole question
~e deft[red for ~ 'period of two weeks, during whi6h time
~e can begin to get an expression f~om the medical
community on this matter.
Mr. Coco explained that he'would like to see all interested
parties meet with Mr. Gill to formulate a questionnaire
to be sent to the medical representatives in this
community.
Above mg~ion carried.
On request of Mr. Miller, Mayor Mack directed that this
questionnaire be sent to all people concerned.
3. UP 67-227 - APPEAL
APPEAL OF THE DECISION OF THE TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
DENYING USE PERMIT NO. 67-227 OF KENNETH HINSVARK TO
PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A SERVICE STATION AT THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF NEWPORT AVE. AND MAIN ST.
Staff report and ~ommission action presented by Mr.
Supinger.
Hearing opened at 9=40 P.M.
Mr. Kenneth Hinsvark, applicant, spoke on behalf of this
~ppeal stating that they felt this is a key location and
that they ultimately planned to develop the entire 5 acre
parcel, but had not been asked to file plans for that
at the time they applied for this Use Permit. Also
questioned the province of the Planning Commission to
regulate the economics or need for another station.
On questioning by Councilman Coco, the City Attorney stated
that although the Planning Commission had not denied this
Use Permit by direct motion, the application was denied as
no action granting the permit was taken, nor was the
hearing or decision continued.
Mr. F. Westover of Gulf Oil Corp. spoke in favor of the
granting'of this permit and stated he was in favor of
Use Permits for architectural control and to govern
developments but not governing the need or the economics.
After a discussion as to whether or no= the Code required
a plan for the entire commercial development when it
contained 5 acres or more, it was the opinion of the City
Attorney that although it was not required by ordinance
the Planning Conunission could require it if they saw fit.
Council Minutes
4/3/67 Pg. 4
Rearing No~ 3 cont.
There being no objections or further comments the hearing
was declared closed at 9:59 P.M.
Moved by Miller~ seconded by Ring, that the Planning
Commission be upheld in their denial of this Use Permit.
After further discussion as to use permit requirements,
esthetics of this development, requirements of service
station standards, need for plans on remaining portion
of the 5 acres the above motion to uphold the Planning
Commission's denial and the second were withdrawn.
Moved by Miller, seconded .by Ring, that Use Permit
Applicgtion No. 67-227 be directed back to the Planning
Commission to be handled as they wish by the filing of
a plan for the total development. Motion Carried.
VI.
OLD 1. ORDINANCE NO. 344
BUSINESS
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE
RELATIVE TO FEES AND BUSINESS LICENSES
Moved by Klingelhofer~ seconded by Ring, that Ordinance
No~ 344 have second reading by title only. Carried
unanimously..
Moved .by Ring~ seconded by Klingelhofer, that Ordinance 'hi
No. ~44', amending the Tustin City Code relative to fees
and business licenses, be passed and adopted~ Carried
by roll call. Ayes: Mack, Klingelhofer, Coco, Miller,
Ring. Noes: None~ Absent: None'.
2. ORDINANCE NO. 345
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING ARTICLE III OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE,
RELATIVE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Councilman Coco questioned the fact that the body Of the
text of Section 2-12, made no notice of the time at which
notice should be filed.
The words "one month prior to expiration of term" were
inserted.
moved by Coco~ seconded by Ring., that Ordinance No, 345,
as corrected, amending Article III of the Tustin City
Code, relative to the Planning Commission, have first
reading by title only. Carried unanimously.
3. RESOLUTION NO. 872
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 678, AND ADOPTING
COUNCIL POLICY N0.20-10, RELATIVE TO APPOINTMENT OF
COMMISSION MEMBERS
The Clerk informed the Council that applications were
retained on file, but that most of the previous applications
has been withdrawnby the applicants.
Council Minutes
4/3/67 Pg. 5
Old Business # 3 cent.
Moved by Miller, seconded by Ring, that Resolution No.
872 be ~ead by title only. 'CarrUed unanimously.
Moved by Coco, seconded by'Klingelhofer, that Resolution
No. 872, rescinding ResolUtion No. 678, and adopting
Council Policy No. 20-10, be passed and adopted. Carried
None. Absent: None.
4..RESOLUTION NO. 873
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING DON HEFNER.
Moved by Coco, seconded by Klt~elhofer, that Resolution
No. 87~'be read in its en%irety'.' Carried.
Moved by Ring, seconded by Klin~elhofer, that Resolution
No. 877, commending DonHefner, be passed and adopted.
Motion carried unanimously.
5. ORDINANCE NO. 346
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR A
LICENSE AND PERMIT BOARD
Moved by Coco, seconded by Klingelhofer, that Ordinance
~o. 346 have first readin~ by title only. Carried
Unanimously.
6. ORDINANCE NO. 347
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATIVE TO
ENTERTAINMENT ESTABLISHMENTS.
~unoilman Coco stated that several suggestions to
strengthen this Ordinance had been presented ~o the City
Administrator and incorporated in the Ordinance.
Moved by Coco, seconded b~ Ring, that Dr. dinance No. ~47
have first readir~ by title only. Carried unanimously.
7. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT REQUEST - Robert & Lenora Dill
Cent. from March 20th meeting.
In answer to questioning by Mr. Coco, Mr. Gill said that
~his would be reviewed by the Building Department, but
there were no other comments or specific conditions a~
~his time other than those em file from the Police and
Fire Departments.
Moved by Ring, seconded bF Miller, that this entertainmen~
permit ~e denied. ·
Councilman Coco made the following statement as a
matter for the record:
~ ~ Council Minu~es~ 4/3/67 Pg. 6
Old Business NO. 7 Cont.
Coco -
What we started to work on tonight is a very stringent
Ordinance, for the benefit of the audience and those who
haven't read it, to regulate entertainment in the City
of Tustin. We had our first reading of an Ordinance
which is extremely specific in not allowing topless and --
bottomless and any other of the exposed types of enter-
tainment that is starting to become prevalent in
Orange County. This is one of the stronger Ordinances
in the County, and whether or not it holds up in court
is not the fault of the way it is wcitten, but of the
possible pre-emption of the field by the State. I think
we need something like this in the City of Tustin to
avoid some of the troubles of the other cities. And I
think we are well under way with our first reading tonight,
and our next reading at the next Council meeting, to
avoid going any further into the realm of the indecency
that we have seen in this County. This Should take care
of those things that might transgress, or go beyond the
bounds of good taste.
The applicant before us is asking for an entertainment
permit. The recommendations from the City Staff seem to
be neutral in the sense of qualifying with past require-
ments. I'm very strongly in favor of passing a rather
strict Ordinance against the indecent entertainment.
As far as I see in the applicant's petition, he has no
intention of putting in this type of entertainment.
Tonight we read an ordinance and after the second reading
he will not be able to - even if he should so desire.
Above motion failed. Motion was re-read by the Clerk
as requested by Mr. Miller and a re-vote by roll call
was called for. Motion carried. Ayes: Ring, Klingelhofer,
Miller, Mack. Noes~ COCO. AbSent: None.
VII.
NEW 1. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR IMPROVING YORBA STREET
BUSINESS FROM 1268' NORTH OF FOURTH STREET TO 3177' NORTH
OF FOURTH STREET.
Moved by. MilleR, seconded by Klingelhofer, that the
contract for improving Yorba St. from i2~8' North of
Fourth St. to 3177' North of Fourth St. be awarded to
the Sully-Miller Contracting Co. in the amount of
~10,276.21 and the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized
to execute the necessary documents. Carried.
2. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR IMPROVING MCFADDEN STREET
FROM A.T. & S.F. RAILROAD TO WALNUT AVENUE.
Moved by Miller, seconded by Ring, that the contract for
m~vi~g McFadden St. from the A.T. & S.F. ~l'~to
Walnut Ave. be awarded to Sully-Miller Contracting Co.
in the amount of $21,488743 and the ~ayor and City Clerk
be authorized to execute' th~ necessary documents. Carri~
3. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, THE
IRVINE CO., AND THE CITY FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION
ON PORTIONS OF RED HILL AVENUE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS
BETWEEN MAC ARTHUR BLVD. AND THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY,
AND TO AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER OF $19,000.00 FROM
UNDISTRIBUTED RESERVE TO ACCOUNT NO. 5000.
Council Minutes
4/3/67 Pg. 7
New Business #3 cont.
Moved by Miller~ seconded by Klingelhofe~, that the
Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the
agreement between the County of 0rsnge'~ the Irvine Company
and the City of Tustin to provide additional street
construction for portions within the City limits oh
Red Hill Avenue from MacArthur Blvd. to the Santa Ana
Freeway, and to authorize the transfer of $19,000.00
from Undistributed Reserve to Account No. 5000..~arried.
4. AGREEMENT WITH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, FOR COMMUNITY
PROMOTION ACTIVITIES.
Moved by Miller, seconded by Klingelhofe~, that the Mayor
and City Clerk be authorized To execute agreement with
!he Tustin Chamber Of Commerco for community promotion
activities for one year beginning April l, 1967, and
the expenditure of necessary reserve funds from the
1966167 fiscal year be authorized. Carried.
5- EMPLOYEES, RETIREMENT SYSTEM
~oved by Rt~g, seconded~ by Klingelhofer, that the City
s oC
~ Y ity employees and to begin proced
urea as necessary. ...Carried.
Mayor Mack commended the Commi~e for bringing forth
the facts on this matter so that the Council could make
a decision.
6. TRAVEL REQUEST - INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
MUNICIPAL CLERKS
Moved by Klingelhofer, seconded by Ring that the City
'Cl~rk be authorized tO attend the annual conference o~~
the..~nternational Institute of Municioal Clerks to be
held in Los Angeles, May 22-25, 1967 ~nd ~o incur all
necessary costs at City expense. Carried.
7. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS
Moved by Ring, secondedby Miller, that demands in the
amount ~f ~52.703.82 be ~proved and pai~. Carried.
VIII.
REPORTS & 1. AGREEMENT WITH RICHFIELD OIL CO.
OTHER "
BUSINESS Mr. Gill presented an agreement with Richfield Oil Co.
for the purchase of gasoline for a period of one year
from March 1967. with a:one year extension subject to
mutual agreement. T~ls was the low bid through County
.-. Purchasing.
Moved by Klingelhofer, seconded by Ri~t?, that the Mayor
and Cit~ Clerk be authorized to execut~ agreement with
Richfield Oil C---- -__ ~o. Motion Carrie~.
2. TUSTIN TILLER DAY STREET DANCE,
~oved b~ Klingelhofer, seconded by Ri~, that re~st
of Tustin Tiller Days to postpone' the ~pril 8th?~eet
~snce to April 22~d be approved. Carried.
Council Minutes
4/3/67 Pg. 8
Reports & Other Business cont.
Following reports received - no action necessary.
Parks & Recreation Commission - recommendation re:
California Roadside Council. ~-~
Personnel Activity Register - Harry E. Gill.
Excerpt from Wall Street Journal - A. J. Coco
Excerpt from L. A. Times - Harry E. Gill.
Excerpt from S. A. Register - Harry E. Gill
Legislstlve Bulletin - League of Calif. Cities~
IX.
CORRES- Following Correspondence received -'no action taken:
PONDENCE
City Newsletter - Harry E. Gill.
Minutes of a Special Meeting - Orange County League
of Cities Executive Board.
Application for Planning Commission - Robert L. Shaw.
Resolution re California College of Medicine Orange
County Chamber of Commerce.
Suggested amendments to Streets & Highways Code - City
of Fountain Valleyj
Resolution re Allocation of State Gasoline Taxes - City
of National City.
Transcript of Symposium on "Land Use, Planning and
Assessment" - County of Orange.
X.
ADJOURN- Moved by Ring~ seconded by Coco, ~hst meeting be adjourned.
MENT Carried.
MAYOR