HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 10 DSGN T.R. ROAD 05-21-90DATE: MAY 14, 1990
TO: WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
CONSENT CALENDAR NO. 10
5/21/90
Inter - Com
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR FINAL DESIGN OF TUSTIN RANCH
ROAD (WALNUT AVENUE TO EDINGER AVENUE)
RECOMMENDATION:
For consideration by the City Council at their meeting of May 21, 1990.
It is recommended that the City Council approve..a professional services
agreement with Moffat & Nichol, Engineers, for the final design of Tustin
Ranch Road (Walnut Avenue to Edinger Avenue) in the amount of
$496,292.00, and authorize execution of the agreement by the Mayor and
City Clerk. It is further recommended that a supplemental 1989-90 budget
appropriation be authorized in the capital improvement program in the
amount of $132,741.00 to cover preliminary and final engineering design
costs.
BACKGROUND:
Proposals were solicited from twelve consulting engineering firms to
perform the final engineering design and construction engineering
services for the future extension of Tustin Ranch Road from Walnut
Avenue to Edinger Avenue. Eleven of the twelve firms submitted a
proposal as follows:
CDC Engineering
Centennial Civil Engineers, Inc.
Greiner Engineering
Harris & Associates
JayKim Engineering, Inc.
J.P. Kapp & Associates, Inc.
Kaiser Engineers Corporation
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers
U.M.A. Engineering, Inc.
U.R.S. Consultants, Inc.
Willdan Associates
DISCUSSION:
The eleven proposals have been evaluated by four staff members on the
basis of demonstrated competence, professional qualifications necessary
for the satisfactory performance of the required services, and
familiarity and prior experience with providing this type of service.
The firm of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers, has been recommended by the
selection committee to perform the consulting services necessary for the
final engineering design and construction engineering for the
improvement of Tustin Ranch Road from Walnut Avenue to Edinger Avenue.
The estimated fee for the preliminary and final engineering design
services is $382,741.00.
TUSTIN RANCH ROAD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
MAY 14, 1990
PAGE 2
The estimated fee for the future construction engineering services is
$113,551.00 based upon 1990 costs. When the actual project design has
been completed, and the timing of the construction phase has been
determined, the estimated construction engineering services fee will be
adjusted in accordance with provisions in the agreement and a
supplemental budget apropriation requested at that time.
Currently, $250,000 has been budgeted for final design and partial
construction phase. The proposed supplemental budget appropriation to
cover the preliminary and final design work is $132,741.00.
It will be necessary for the City Council to authorize a supplemental
1989-90 budget appropriation in the Capital Improvement Budget in the
amount of $132,741.00 to fund the preliminary and final design costs.
Bob Ledendecker
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
BL: DRK:mv
Attachment
Dana R. Kas n
Engineerin Se
ces Manager
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into to be effective on the
day of , 1990, by and between CITY OF TUSTIN, a
municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City") and
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS, 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite F2 0 6A, Costa
Mesa, CA 92626 (hereinafter called "Consultant").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City desires to employ Consultant to furnish the
necessary services for providing final engineering design plans and
specifications including preparation of an environmental document,
and construction engineering services for the improvement of Tustin
Ranch Road from Walnut Ave. to Edinger Ave., hereinafter referred
to as "Project"; and
WHEREAS, Consultant is
services in connection with
the necessary services; and
qualified to provide the necessary
said Project and has agreed to provide
WHEREAS, Consultant has submitted to City Consultant's
proposal dated February 12, 1990 which includes the following
parts, attached hereto, marked as indicated and incorporated herein
as though set forth in full hereat: Scope of Work (Exhibit "A"),
Schedule (Exhibit "B") Es�imated Fees (Exhibit "C"), and Hourly
Rates (Exhibit "D").
NOW, THEREFORE, City agrees to employ and does hereby employ
Consultant to provide the professional services for the Project,
and City and Consultant, for the consideration set forth herein,
agree as follows:
Section 1: Scope of Consultant's Services. Consultant
agrees to furnish to City consulting services for the Project.
These services shall include all of the services solicited in
City's Request for Proposal dated January 16, 1990, a copy of which
is attached hereto marked Exhibit "E"; and all of the services
included within the Consultant's proposal.
Section 2: Time for Completion. It is hereby understood
and mutually agreed that the time for completion of the work to be
performed by Consultant is an essential condition of this
Agreement. Consultant agrees that it shall prosecute regularly and
diligently the work of this Agreement according to reasonable
schedules established by City for the various items described and
as outlined within Consultant's proposal. Consultant shall not be
-1-
accountable for delays in the progress of its work caused by any
condition beyond its control and without the fault or negligence
of Consultant. However, there are many factors beyond the control
of City which may cause delays. Any delays shall not entitle
Consultant to any additional compensation, regardless of the party
responsible for the delay (except as provided in Section 3 below).
Section 3: Compensation. The compensation to be paid
under this Agreement for preparation of all preliminary and final
engineering plans and specifications shall be as set forth in the
Consultants's proposal with the total cost estimated at $382,741.00
and in no event shall the total cost exceed twenty percent (20%)
in excess of this estimated amount (subject to the adjustments
prescribed in the next paragraph). The compensation to be paid
under this Agreement for all construction engineering services
shall be as set forth in the Consultant's proposal with the total
cost estimated at$113,551.00 and in no event shall the total cost
exceed twenty percent (20%) in excess of this estimated amount
(subject to the adjustments prescribed in the next paragraph)
The fees prescribed above shall be subject to adjustment on
January 1, 1992 and on the first day of each year thereafter ("the
adjustment date") as follows: The base for computing the
adjustment shall be the Consumer Price Index For All Urban
Consumers, Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim Metropolitian Area (All
Items) (base year 1967=100), published by the United States
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics ("Index"), which
is in effect on the effective date of this Agreement ( "Beginning
Index"). The Index published most immediately preceding the
adjustment date in question ("Extension Index") is to be used in
determining the amount of the adjustment. If the Extension Index
has increased over the Beginning Index, the fees and costs for the
following year (until the next fee adjustment) shall be set by
multiplying the fees set forth above by a fraction, the numerator
of which is the Extension Index and the denominator of which is the
Beginning Index. The twenty percent (20%) "not to exceed"
provisions prescribed in the preceding paragraph shall apply to the
costs adjusted as prescribed in this paragraph.
Progress payments for work completed will be paid as the work
progresses, within thirty (30) days of the date of Consultant's
invoice.
Section 4: Statement of Costs. Pursuant to the provisions
of California Government Code Section 7550, the total amount
expended by City relating to the preparation of the report and
documents prescribed herein shall be set forth within the final
edition thereof, in a separate section, in a statement
substantially as follows: "Pursuant to California Government Code
Section 7550, the City of Tustin expended the total amount of
$ for the preparation of this report and/or documents."
-2-
Section 5: Job Site Conditions. The City agrees that in
accordance with generally accepted construction practices, the
construction contractor will be required to assume sole and
complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course
of construction of this project, including safety of all persons
and property and that this requirement shall be made to apply
continuously and not be limited to normal working hours.
Section 6: Miscellaneous Provisions.
A. City and Consultant further agree to the following
conditions:
(1) City, by notifying Consultant in writing, shall have
the right to terminate any or all of the services covered by this
Agreement at any time. In the event of such termination,
Consultant shall be paid for services rendered to the effective
date of the termination.
(2) Consultant agrees that it shall proceed immediately
and diligently to perform the services provided for in this
Agreement upon receipt of notice from City to proceed therewith.
(3) The terms and provisions of this Agreement shall
extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of heirs,
executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective
parties thereto.
(4) Consultant shall perform the services hereunder as
an independent contractor and under no circumstances or conditions
shall Consultant or any of its agents, servants and employees, be
considered as an employee or agent of the City.
(5 ) Consultant shall perform all services required under
this Agreement using that degree of care and skill ordinarily
exercised under similar conditions in similar localities, and shall
be responsible for all errors and omissions for services performed
by Consultant under the terms of this Agreement. Consultant agrees
to indemnify, defend and hold City, its agents, employees,
successors and assigns harmless from any loss, damage, injury,
sickness, death, or other claim made by other persons and from all
costs, expenses and charges, including attorney's fees, arising
from Consultant's negligent or intentionally inadequate performance
of its duties prescribed in this Agreement. Consultant shall
maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement
its general and professional liability policies of insurance and
shall deliver certificates of insurance satisfactory to City which
designate City as an additional named insured (except as to
professional liability coverage).
(6) Consultant shall carry and pay for Workers
Compensation insurance as is necessary to fully protect City and
-3-
Consultant and its employees and relieve City from all
responsibility under said laws in connection with Consultant's
performance under this Agreement, and shall file with City a
certificate certifying to said protection and waiving rights of
subrogation against City.
(7) Consultant certifies that there shall be no
discrimination against any employee who is employed in the work
covered by this Agreement, or against any application for such
employment, because of race, religion, color, sex, or national
origin including, but not limited to, the following:
a. Employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer,
recruitment, or recruitment advertising, lay-
off or termination, rates of pay or other forms
of compensation, and selection for training,
including apprenticeship.
(8) Consultant shall provide City monthly with a
detailed itemization of all work performed, and the fees accrued
thereon, in complete and sufficient detail to fully apprise City
thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed by the parties
on the day and year first above written.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
Byx.�
(Name Printed/Title)
CITY OF TUSTIN, a Municipal Corporation
:A
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
James G. Rdurke
City Attorney
JGR:kbg:R:4/30/90(a\699.rr)
-4-
Mayor
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
Febru..,-y 12, 1990
City of Tustin
Department of Public Works/Engineering
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
Attn: Dana Kasdan, Engineering Services Manp.ger
rUSTIN PUBLIC WORKS DEPT
Subject: Proposal for Consultant Services for the Tustin Ranch Road
Extension Project: Walnut Avenue to Edinger Avenue
Dear Mr. Kasdan:
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is pleased to submit the following proposal to
provide the consultant services for the Tustin Ranch Road Extension Project in
the City of Tustin.
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has designed more than 200 bridges, grade
separation and roadway projects for California highways in the past 40 years -
- most of which are in Southern California. For these projects, our team of
engineering professionals has prepared concept studies, project study reports,
and complete construction documents specifically for Caltrans review and
approval and in compliance with both Caltrans and FHWA standards.
We believe that our team offers unique qualifications and a history oT
excellent working relationships with the various agencies and railroads
involved in this project, including extensive experience with the Marine Corps
Air Station. One of our more recent projects interfacing with the MCAS was the
relocation of the heavy lift Helo Pad from Tustin to Camp Pendleton which also
involved the City of Tustin.
Our firm's offices in Costa Mesa and in Long Beach and our locally based
subconsultants allow easy access to the project as well as convenience for
coordination with the City of Tustin. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has provided
ongoing and continuous service to governmental and private clients in Orange
County for more than 30 years.
Our project team is familiar with the project area, having performed previous
engineering and environmental studies and design in the vicinity of the Tustin
Ranch Road project. The subconsultant that we have selected to perform the
- survey Derek McGregor, Inc. (DMc) has, for the past two years, performed
complete hydrological and hydraulics studies, traffic circulation studies and
survey for the Tustin Air Station, and together with Mr. J.H. Tom Miles, will
3151 AIRWAY AVENUE 0 SUITE F206A 0 COSTA MESA 0 CALIFORNIA 0 92626 0 (714) 979-3549, FAX (714) 979-4131
City of Tustin
Tustin Ranch Road Proposal
February 12, 1990
Page 2
provide the interface with the Marine Air Corps Station.
We are enthusiastic about the possibility of working with you on this project
and look forward to presenting our qualifications in more detail in your
interview process.
Sincerely,
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
-J
Robert D. Nichol
President
RDN/mt
90024
Tustin Ranch Road Extension Project Proposal
Contents
1. Listing of Similar Projects
2. Project Organization and Resumes of Individuals Assigned to the
Project
3. Project Approach and Scope of Work (Exhibit A)
4. Project Schedule (Exhibit B)
5. Fee Schedule (Exhibit C)
6. Hourly Rate Sheet (Exhibit D)
Introduction to the Firm
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is a multi -discipline firm that has successfully
assumed the design responsibility for single projects with construction costs
in excess of $100 million. Since its founding in 1945, Moffatt & Nichol,
Engineers has provided engineering services in support of the transportation
industry and has achieved national recognition in the form of awards for major
long span bridges. Moffatt & Nichol's design staff consists of registered
professional engineers, many of whom have more than 25 years of experience in
the design of highways, drainage facilities, interchanges, bridge and grade
separation structures. The firm has proven excellence and success in FHWA,
CALTRANS and PUC -approved bridge and grade separation and related roadway
structure facilities design. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has also demonstrated
success with projects that require multi -agency participation and coordination,
accelerated design schedules, and budget constraints.
Types of services provided include:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Feasibility Studies.
Field Investigations (Seismic & impact damage, bridge rating).
Project Study Reports, Project Reports.
Environmental Documents.
Bridge Site Studies.
General Plan Development.
Preparation of Construction
Construction Management.
Highway/Interchange design.
Hydraulic design.
Detour design.
Freeway construction traffic
Stage construction plans.
Electrical systems design.
Documents (PS&E).
control plans.
Most of the 200 structures designed by the firm have met both FHWA and Caltrans
criteria. The design process also included review and approval by these
agencies.
CITY OF TUSTIN
TUSTIN RANCH ROAD EXTENTION
PROJECT ORGANIZATION
CITY OF TUSTIN
• LANDSCAPE AND • SURVEY
IRRIGATION • R/W
•HYDROLOGY
• MCAS COORD.
` PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
W. E. HURTIENNE
PROJECTnNEILL
H. R.
MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEERS
SCHAEFER DIXON KIMLEY HORN MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOC.
STRUCTURAL -ROADWAY
GEOTECHNICAL TRAFFIC ENVIRONMENTAL
B. RAGLAND A. JAIN
J. W. WEAVER J. T. CHAVERS C. E. ALLING T. C. CHUNG
L. JENKINS J. SHANGKAUN
B. LARUE R. W. FREEMAN K. BRADY-REBELLA C. ANDERSON
G. JOHNSON
M. E. HOULIHAN
• STRUCTURAL DESIGN
• FOUNDATION • SIGN STRIPING • ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY
• STREET IMPROVMENTS
• SOILS • TRAFFIC SIGNALS •NEPA DOCUMENT
• DRAINAGE
• GEOTECHNICAL • TRAFFIC ANALYSIS • PUBLIC INPUT
• LIGHTING
• MATERIALS
• RAILROAD /P.U.C. INTERFACE
• UTILITY COORDINATION
• MCAS COORDINATION
DENNE' DESIGN GROUP D.M.C. ENGINEERS
• SPECIFICATIONS
LANDSCAPING SURVEY -HYDROLOGY
• CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES
D. DENNE D. MCGREGOR
J. STEEL J. H. T. MILES .
• LANDSCAPE AND • SURVEY
IRRIGATION • R/W
•HYDROLOGY
• MCAS COORD.
2. Project Organization and Resumes of Individuals Assigned to the Project
Key personnel assigned to this project, their assignments and reporting
responsibilities are depicted in the Project Team Organization Chart which
follows this narrative. This team represents an aggregate of more than 100
years of experience in bridge and roadway design. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers
will serve as the prime consultant and be responsible for overall project
management, planning and design.
The experience of the project manager and key project personnel are highlighted
here. Resumes of the project personnel follow this narrative.
Walter E. Hurtienne, Principal -in -Charge
Registration CE 19158
Mr. Hurtienne joined the staff of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers in 1977. P2 is
currently serving in the capacity of Principal Civil Engineer .n charg� of
public works, marinas, military and waterfront projects. Prior to joining
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers, Mr. Hurtienne was Division Engineer in charge of
the Design and Development Division for the City of Huntington Beach. He is
experienced in the areas of storm drain, sanitary sewer, water system, street
and bridge design and construction; private development; and contract
administration.
Mr. Hurtienne has been an employee of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers since 1977.
The firm's activity during this period in its history has included the planning
and design of more than 200 roadway, highway, interchange and grade separation
types of projects. Mr. Hurtienne has performed various roles and participated
in various assignments with more than 55 of these projects. For this type of
work Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers was selected and contracted to perform the
designs by local, City or County agencies working with Caltrans local assistance
groups. Due to the funding nature of these projects, the projects were designed
to meet FHWA and CALTRANS standards. As a result of his long-term participation
with the State and local agencies in the design of these projects, Mr. Ragland
has accumulated a wealth of experience in designing to these standaris, and
developing a highly credible professional rapport with the Caltrans project
engineers and project managers who review the designs and enforce the compliance
with the standards.
Mr. Hurtienne's recent Project Manager experience includes the following:
o Downtown Street Improvement Program, Santa Barbara, CA
o Pacific Coast Highway Widening, Orange County, CA
o Elevated Roadway, John Wayne Airport Expansion Project, Orange County, CA
o Kanan Road Improvements, County of Los Angeles, CA
o Lincoln Avenue Grade Separation, Anaheim, CA
o Woodruff Avenue Reconstruction, Long Beach, CA
o Grove Avenue - Union Pacific Grade Separation
H. Richard Neill, Project Manager
Registration CE 12590, SE 1342
As Chief Structural Engineer, Mr. Neill reviews and approves the firm's
structural projects, contributing experience in structural design. His over 30
years of structural engineering design experience covers both the design and
management of multi -disciplined landside and waterfront facilities.
Mr. Neill has been an employee of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers since 1957. The
firm's activity during this period in its history has included the planning and
design of more than 200 roadway, highway, freeway interchange, and railroad
grade separation types of projects. Mr. Neill has performed various roles and
participated in various assignments with more than 150 of these projects. For
this type of work Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers was selected and contracted to
perform the designs by local, City or County agencies working with Caltrans
local assistance groups. This type of work goes back 35 years. Due to the
funding nature of these projects, they were designed to meet FHWA and Caltrans
standards. As a result of his long-term participation with the State and local
agencies in the design of these projects, Mr. Neill has accumulated a wealth of
experience in designing to these standards, participating in the evolution of
these standards and developing a highly credible •rofessional rapport with thn
Caltrans project engineers and project managers who review the designs and
enforce the compliance with the standards. standards.
Mr. Neill has been involved in the design of over one hundred and fifty highway
and railway bridge structures in California, including the following:
0 Grove Avenue Grade Separation at Union Pacific Railroad, Ontario, CA
o Tippecanoe Avenue Bridge over the Santa Ana River, San Bernardino, CA
o Washington Street Bridge Widening, Colton, CA
o South "E" Street Bridge Widening, San Bernardino, CA
o Dinah Shore Overcrossing, Rancho Mirage, CA
o Bear Valley at Mojave River in San Bernardino County, CA
o Barranca Parkway -Laguna Freeway Interchange, Irvine, CA
o Alton Parkway -Laguna Freeway Overcrossing, Irvine, CA
o Irvine Center Drive Interchange in Irvine, CA
o Kubic Road -Monterey Road Overcrossing/Interchange, County of Riverside,
CA
o Nicole Avenue & Dracaea Avenue Bridges, San Bernardino, CA
o North Carolina Department of Transportation Bridge Replacement Projects
o Vivienda Avenue Grade Separation, Grand Terrace, CA
o Lincoln Avenue Grade Separation, Anaheim, CA
o Prospect Avenue Bridge Replacement, Pasadena, CA
0 32nd Street Bridge Replacement, San Diego, CA
o Willow Avenue Bridge Over San Vicente Creek, San Diego, CA
o Bob Hope Bridge Widening, Rancho Mirage, CA
o Center Street Bridge at Piru Creek, Ventura, CA
The subconsultants are: Kimley Horn, who will conduct traffic analyses and
prepare signalization, lighting, striping and signing design; Schaefer Dixon
Associates who will be performing the geotechnical investigation; Michael
Brandman Associates who will be conducting the environmental studies; Denne
Design Group who will provide the landscape design; and Derek McGregor, Inc.
(DMc) who will provide the surveys for the project and who will handle the
interface with the Marine Corps Air Station. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has
worked with these firms previously and can attest to the high standards of their
work. The following is a brief description of these firms' qualifications.
Schaefer Dixon Associates
SDA was selected to perform the geotechnical services necessary for this
project. Schaefer Dixon Associates is a southern California consulting
engineering firm dedicated to providing professional competence in the practice
of geotechnical engineering. Each project undertaken by SDA is performed under
the direct supervision of an associate or principal of the firm. A sampling of
these project includes:
o I-5 Widening in Santa Ana
o Portola Interchange investigation at Foothill Transportation Corridor
o Routes 60/72 four -level in Pomona
o Carson Street Bridge at Alameda Street and the AT & SF Delores Yards in
Carson, CA
Kimley Horn
Since 1967, has been one of the nation's leading transportation planning,
engineering, and design firms. Kimley Horn has long been recognized for
excellence in engineering and attention to client concerns. The firm's Orange
County Office provides transportation planning and engineering services to a
rapidly expanding market. Kimley Horn has served more than 250 municipalities,
counties, state departments of transportation and other public agencies. Below
is a sampling of recent local projects:
o Foothill Corridor Phasing Project (FCPP) Phase 2 Improvements - Santa Ana,
CA
o Long Beach - Los Angeles Light Rail Transit Project - Long Beach, CA
o Traffic Impact Study Standardization -- Orange County, CA
Denne Design Group
Denne Design Group, located in Newport Beach, California, has the capabilities
to provide responsible services in landscape architecture, planning and urban
design. The firm is a 100 percent Women -Business Enterprise (WBE). A summary
of recent projects includes:
o Caltrans Right of Way (State Highway 91, Cerritos, California)
o Caltrans Right of Way (I - 110)
o I-105/Century Freeway/LAX Utility Relocation
o Caltrans Right of Way (I - 5)
Michael Brandman Associates
MBA provides professional consulting services to the public and private sectors
in the fields of environmental research, planning and processing and natural
resources management. With corporate headquarters in Santa Ana, California, the
staff is very familiar with and has easy access to the project location. MBA
has considerable experience in environmental analysis and documentation for
transportation projects. The firm is thoroughly familiar with FHWA, FAA,
Caltrans and UMTA processes and guidelines for CEQA and/or NEPA compliance.
o Foothill Transportation Corridor Southern Segment EIR -- Orange and San
- Diego Counties, California
o Route 91 - Western Segment High -Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane Project/EA -
Orange County, CA
0 John Wayne Airport SR -55 Freeway Access EA/Finding of No Significant
Impact -Orange County, California
Derek McGregor, Inc.
DMc together with Mr. J.N.T. Miles, will perform the surveys, right-of-way and
interface with the Marine Corps Air Station for this project. DMc Engineering
is a civil engineering design firm located in Irvine, California. The firm
provides a wide spectrum of surveying and civil design for public and private
sector clients engaged in site development and other public works projects.
Much of the recent work accomplished by the DMc Engineering staff has been
directly related to the development of the three transportation corridors in
Orange County. The firm is currently performing traffic studies for three
different Marine Corps Air Stations in Orange and San Diego Counties. Major
issues in each of these studies deal with the impact of the proposed corridors
on the traffic patterns close -by and within the individual air stations. The
research for these studies contributes significantly to the ongoing programming
and design for the three corridors.
Specifically, at the Tustin Air Station, DMc performed a complete Hydrologic and
Hydraulics analysis for the entire station. This particular assignment included
the interaction and impact of Orange County Flood Control Channel, F-10, which
parallels the AT & SF Railway and Edinger Avenue in the Tustin Ranch Road
Extension Project area. Results of that analysis will be part of the flood
control and drainage considerations for this project.
.�'"rr�`t**"�,.,77 .. �,...,rAk�p _.. A,_ ,_. .. ..as, a:..,..;r}r� 1,' ,,gg _ 'w•. 'i 'G "Rr`ki� ♦e.�p��,":: E'}:'�.:rr�T,�SF.r�?�!�2 t�sx�.raeelw•y5.r .,�A- '9� ¢- .nl:�.w:F •.fit! :s ,7-a-"a,s�, y-.M"
.^,S`„'� �. Is•- ! -� tY^ �: •'�'-i�+ :; R'�'.•�X "'S:tif�'.�7 fr '`,i- �': jtTi �r .'i` �3 P9 1.� :"Z �'yi�t�,p y� R
+... p. 'vl. n,�.1J°it�� � .� , �.-'.p.i�, �.t;,, m utiT :. j` �� R$ .ir'�'� �rlfi4•!'T' ,�;.qpi 'w ,.. i�Y �_�' .�1 �il�•Y
.e
s,�.w,.. �. . ,✓t+f.�. t;� �».,.:._ j�, ..y .aF ,�' �'az is F�`> � .Xrs �° '�,;j',A.., tr-.:.,..r} '•;.; ":; �.�.� �: +• x �;�
w ... : Y. ,T..�"fi.,...i ,A`5 -#4F� • j, �'.+' t. .ice 3µ.. c � - ° �,�T't� #' a- � � i. _-r:' . �,} ,.�.. tia.
A
�:yi>'�'
.. ......fie. "rr >..� ... :F �- ?> : -. ;5, :;z'; �• #. r J:.,.K-�,,,. ^� �, r .: rrn.;�.
..,�,.... ;, : -," : s'. 9 : .-. r'-K "'.^ . �'; r �,.� a �. _'• Jv.i, �.�e,t• •,� � �.:rJ' 'si t � � _ 'r" � `.,i^
u t P :.. ..`' 7 ..r. :- f y-r'-f `"�J'S^ •'*', .. `'''',j ,) f �a �i. ,N^: @ i.'.s•
J� y r �F . - A .. t `#'�vt,�} •X��..y'�s`�,*.., .� �.� .'.Jsr� �,'' � ca ,,.q
-
• A
..2
v,
4 }ter ` � r • - ,.' -. —IIIIII7r
P 3 � Y eiA
-.'�F-,i;T. a _ - ..;t-i b- *'_ a ,� ", t i mac: - _ 1 • _ �� rr { _ r
r
'"c '4"=" s a. t- j •,±, _- t .:J� Y�� � �- J t r - � � x .-- t
s` ; r - t•v' ''.rr J J},.+.r'•iP-�•.,� %• �}.b .t• ;� ism. •.
I w t {: .'G' 'S •.:.. 4 j+i b s4.aA 4. 1 r� ,t r ,� 'i' _
'� .j ,.F:.lrfe t .�5 7 n � y ,,. 77�v ( ?-.;# s� �. b�$'i•...t,: }. n a
i• ^�.'i'i ` F J -�'°� y . : -�Y V=•�,-a,, � b4 'r�w 1 '�} } .t'.? •'J ✓�t
K': .•. ... v.:`... :a x' .,.-. -..: . at ..1r:: • •'?•. e-, t.it'?Y � n +.. z t M
' , ,„7t •,' .j--,.;+_.`...st.: y r. •,r.: .-A-. - - .f�., .y-..+,r-r .a..' '.zs7v :?+r :a}^t' _ �.. ..;1 T `Y. �( n-� .r.
.; ..'- ,0.:' � -0. k 3 ? t _ .: ,� �`...'s F' -• .'=•rr ,,' sr '� � i.. r a , sit
. ..., Jr• s .� .,.: r« �� # � s; .,r r ) 4i r c w tA:'. i'^ a i � t^•• tr .a°
,, yy
I. .S r+.•-, »°-• r„.' '::� t i'+a:- :,:7 , _, Chir j'.x. >4..a J J..� t"_ r '�. y. - s
.A»j� , ek d ..i gi T.c �tiac Y✓ '"'`)ti:N.; v_�' �.�:�+; >o.�. A ,;j � cs .*,. t t? � :'A ^.j, 4 'i:s .i s +t, �, "' t _
S ;Fe r ,r r � -t} E.. xT-y?... �J.n'; s�':�:�'.,�`,t �,,,:3 x,•, • .. '..,'�«. 'a �jrA-�y f �-`S •t ip f �,�... �rt:y Y'r. ,z 7 �-�
♦..y',n��t J � tl� �y ,ri}a1,.r T`v .3'� •� S��r'�vr� qy �..-y � �.t ;.. �.: ��- T,r t .;.e�"rri't' r-F ; � 'x a� j�` t 4�:� ,,,,>,., t� +' �-�
7 «
At - t X.m...•r '•4,J, F'.r K,.., i rtd' J 9 y.„'' wr ; fir.$ {%. t :s .: ki. ^ °t.'P' ;� , ,k.. L.. 4 J '�
,'�..y. T,'.:. r ?. R b.. ;•:-a,•1..: w. ,;n.., .w r • �',%,. . �> + - _ ..'." ,,, ''". na!:3 - a •a v�{
:+eµ ,t +t �'� _.. a. •* '�. x:J.,..-. .e � •. j. "` �. ..ave.. .. �: �` .,: .`* (.,: i ,, . ,7 j'. �, k ::{'• +r : { a -nr. �,a � ,1 ,.-.
-:. � -, .,, ... r -. �,�:. ..>..,. x �fi.. f_..�r9a-.*. #.taypt;.:. _ .a'f`'.'s r.-e � • i' a s.'.:„, i ''; _1�: Ate. "�' 7,
'.v.3.r..,, : :� 9:.,w%> �. i �, •. ,,y «t..t{ . sa, vA:.4V.f,r! J }� S �a..n a 3 t- �^i E J
{ �p�
'iir >.. - 4 .. v'=.✓• "r y'.. �. M: .,�: u}-"'�.. ... .� Y..rF�T �'..,.,, k"-- , .. ... ,.. '�t f!`'4 1 !Y ,Nt.:'.e / iR. .,,`f i h}. _.i'R
1 ♦ i .J P _-. `y .:�_,I t,. �,,. i sy � - .v .. 1 . t 4 .�. +n 3, f
t MJ ^ � 3•Y..; ,� -:f 3 K:-'iR 4 t ' i�:..i1'L 1;i^ r 3e"d. iµ4 S ; p' P a; ti 4 .l. t .
� ���' ,+� � •' -� 4 ,,,. yy. � A_ l y+ :+-�. + ' r s c. -•3 "C tf s=�� ay ar " r.
.K 1 i'[1 %-� f rr f _ i `'p � J 1 i:� i �� ' er ,� /.a 'S J 'C.♦ t ���i
i
+^�,., • " r '(, a`. •. ♦ � w �. '` ` W,} - Y ® � :,t• 4' .x 1tK t �Yr• b,.,• ? �' g`« '+ >+ a ''�f '" Y a T '•,i'..
v
x e
IIl
' :T: p, 'x J,.. _„`v w -_- J -. �" ..-•y •;,, r x.. •.y A R^c �.. i. t•�:fit 't`.
,. ', .:. '✓tn ��' ,: q.. �- y .h � -.Cr r :.. :^ "t t,�+.7j ,>:! .3' ay.,., .q a' :� . S
J.r ri.? x �'. A <>w Y ,� '� t f.. � •< r k Y � � : N,A t r:z'.
�`� `."j' rs,: R-.r'A t„ .x: ;:�;.'1« ss :� _ #;: >�' .L. �" ` l}. ,�+- e - �„'�r+,�'-_T,"S" '_c -:s•'- - Yzf-.
y
• y.. a ' �
din k �'.i S,, ...� �- i . 3 .i 4 tf t �, '" '• ' 'r .r-', ° f .� t - >h 2G. -J ):,
��v. syn � (� 5k i h., � Y F l : 4 x fry • _ � _ ,>
Y
'• Yr , �, s' ,J n
".:•,•.yyi��
'} . •. �.t•, .•}i„ w .r,"�a r.1 +,.. ..;,�j 1:'}. . 4-_ ?, t .. .,. '.. �' . :'`:' K ,x} •+�, t�` -j � a �' .'; y
�:ir.. ':rvP.,{, � Say rs{ �•��. $ '4 .i. d A
;�Sr
s'ta'r tt r
:..+ .i� +, :+ i, ,t�a.irs'1�. • •aJ } �( a
Ll.
�M
T.
e
•
.. 'J''Y r .�y. -., 3 , a..^, a w, }.i �ar.,,•` w a^ a �. rri�' -::a'Z ''�` . � � . 3p, rr s r "s t r,'. `3Y.i�
e :� :.ir : �-' r F; .,,;,. , a ti w.. :R'� me R ,,t,: v - x ':,q r-- �:+) -• t
A
�: b;, tq. Y: • .p :+Y a.; �:.","s 'ri, *'.sY�.;-'' ,=. spy: -,, r.. '+�,; r ••.t.- :: v'.: .b ':Y° f_ , i`.,..j. -.a. , ,- .'
j ..;... Y �s,.4 �d_. .,g�#,,'.. .rs';.+, �: i.K+ a�" '. x a. ,! T.• to ...+J� x �, "fir F �,;..» + r„ ` t; 'i . # � r,'} � ,, � i ,
is-f ��� �R��r s ,..x F�',.,.,, ,'': :_ , `. - ���•,y .. .. • r,� w• _ .vY k .'{`i,`,� •. grj�Y _ «.� t .:•kj
' � sq?` icB y T.'!R{� :•-':.x e L .°:. , �.r v�a;•,j a. ;! . >- .:-' 'ia� 4�,� �..: +� .. J•^ y �.,� .:>. �V' '_a •. `+,r. -z, r � '` .a -:, •:3C..
_ ...,y, i.:--s' d :.,aJ`':a'„ •...::-,�. :,y;,...`.•,,a.r'* .: .. .. �:: ., t.a-d., - •', "`r.`.. •�.i '� ,i•,.,' ? .a: a ?.
..><r. •r.,..R.:t.. , !, ._.. ?'. :.x' .-..,� . : ..T : -, ,.. „en ,. r..: ,R. �''),.a4 .•:'�• .E.: <, .�,k � , � ?t t.{-: .^r'"r ' t, k, � ��;�=
o-, . r� l�^'a,.,Y ..R. ,g„ , %+� . fx'. a Y>�. ..ti"; t 4 . - ..i �v+ !. *.t '4. •P e a(.:- ',s, +J, z:: 5 K r' 1 -,;.�
'.c S:„"';.?�-}a•i,a.,. :�- .::,.vn:,• ,.,,:..x. �.� ..�: °: zi. r. �.. ....., � 3 :a t-:. «�.i"'-'.j',kw,.�a,.. �".« .a•+, Y .y...8" :-.'r'
r �A.y7 1 xK .N i- ,�et,.v. { �� J. .� a '�. >*� :Y.: eY i° :� c•'t^�" ".w � x �"• .a„'}hi,...'L are-ti,"i '''
1'��
ax-4:- y,��??•�,-, Y, i.,« �.: n.�ia ,.w. jJ:� ,`�' 5- %t'' ':s, ��' z •i - Kh �'^�:rr,...r ...v
•.:'4' 4.?s”-, n} :-. �. .'"a � .r� .}'., z;"�^ rn t''sss 1' <r5.
.J(,, .. '}-k :' may` �.. l _!�'p,, of 'iv',,.^.Y k•~ t '. lw iJi ,t
if-
Lam. ,. L' �. '.Ji.-..., L .. 1.�'h"'. 1��n,k.rF yy i ..'E'c'', �.F .'a ♦.
•`�. �`e�p. ,..,ia})`,� M� :-,a.. .•4 .;R f'., u,S a..-z. .t '}.' � .tet' t
�� '�•'.'. � ay w-:+A, f M.� ,.�!.. �,.r�" ' .i:� J:{ f'`' .+J� i ,n � <'Y ,r. .t . ,lw � ,"'�o.
'-^aW..r'._y.. ' . ,J.� d •"b'-C, 1#k s... d'• ' i..!:: '�` t ,�''�J. �' ' �!•:.}.. ^} .� i� . ; 5• �. L 4 i -
r'! 14��..4`.�:' J'i .;( �'js u. ' .'&- : i4�•Iih 3-v. i. '"�".. ( r4 . i-...: s M t''j` : , to , q A vk,?l. ! T
a j, - Y � `�",,C 7 ,. ,.- i k ,,. ��. , 1 , r:....:•t�.w: ..g • ..=:' '' .+a #: - # Y w, p � 1, y.�
.. .a x.4'�.;r 4' Y''0.'.j.J � ''f.x t;. u}. .i .. •tJ'i ;: �' '. �>, �
i
PROJECT APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK
The approach of Moffat & Nichol, Engineers has developed for the Tustin Ranch
project addresses the major issue, that must be resolved prior to construction.
These issues are:
1. Environmental
2. MCAS (Tustin) Right -of -Way Acquisition Agreement
3. The AT&SF Railroad Construction/Maintenance Agreement
4. Public Utilities Commission Order to Construct
5. Development of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E)
All of the above issues must be completed prior to allowing construction to
commence. The environmental consideration in essence should be completed prior
to development of PS&E items.
The Project has been subdivided into three phases that group the tasks into the
time frame elements.
* Phase I -
* Phase II -
* Phase III -
Environmental
Development of PS&E
Construction of Services
Environmental: Michael Brandon Associates (MBA) is the member developing the
necessary environmental documentation . A critical element in this phase is the
necessary approval/processing time by the City and Navy. A preliminary
environmental assessment (PEA) in accordance with the Department of the Navy
constructions and an initial Study in accordance with CEQA will be combined into
one document. This approach is based on the previous environmental documentation
for projects requiring both federal and local documentation. It is estimated
that the process will require 14 weeks to complete with an additional 8 weeks
for final documentation for a total of 22 weeks.
MCAS (Tustin) Right -of- Way: The acquisition of approximately 12.3 acres from
the MCAS could be a critical element in the overall scheduling. It is assumed
in developing our approach that Moffat & Nichol will be an element in these
efforts. Because of this possibility we have included Mr. Derrick McGregor of
DMc, Inc. Engineers as part of the team. Their primary efforts are the survey
and R/W requirements, of which a significant part will be the interface with
MCAS. DMc has been extensively involved with the local Marine Corps
establishments, particularly with traffic circulation. In addition we have added
Mr. Tom Miles, as part of the DMc team, who was formerly with Moffat & Nichol,
to assist as required in the interface with the bases. Mr. Miles is a former
Naval Civil Engineer Corps Officer Stationed at El Toro MCAS. During his tenure
at Moffat & Nichol he was responsible for the Helo-pad relocation from
Tustin to Camp Pendleton, which allows for the extension of Jamboree Road. We
believe with these team members, we can contribute significantly to the
necessary interfacing in obtaining the right-of-way.
The AT&SF Railroad. The project involves construction of an overhead, grade
separation structure over The AT&SF double tracks and right-of-way. This will
require an easement from the railroad and an agreement on maintenance and
participation of the railroad in the construction costs.
The usual processing tine for the construction/maintenance agreement is 8 to 12
months if the project is a relatively straight forward as this is. The railroad
will require approval of the PS& E prior to granting entry on their right-of-
way. This approval is usually coincident with their signing the agreement.
Moffatt & Nichol has been involved with numerous grade separation projects over
their 45 years, many locally involving The AT&SF. The experience gained will
allow for the smooth processing of the approval and construction/maintenance
agreement. A conservative 12 months has been allowed for the railroad
processing efforts.
Public Utilities Commission (PUC): An approval, or order to construct, is
required from the P.U.C. which has control over railroad crossings in
California. The application and processing is relatively straight forward
providing there is agreement with the railroad. In this case, we do not foresee
any major problems and have included the necessary efforts for the application.
The expected time is four months which is nearly coincident with the executed
railroad agreement.
There is a possible source of funding through the P.U.C. Grade Separation Fund.
The next application time is November 1991, however, there are provisions which
allow for construction in advance of actual funding. These provisions will be
pursued with the City of Tustin as the time and schedule dictates.
The basic development of the PSH is more than adequately delineated in the 75
items of the Scope of Work accompanying the RFP. We have seen to add an
additional item of work noted as 6A for the Traffic Control work associated with
the bridge bent construction in Edinger Avenue and the intersection
modifications at Walnut Avenue and Edinger Avenue.
The Scope of Work, as noted below is essentially the same as noted in the RFP.
The more detailed approach to the project and Scope of Work for the PSH is
developed by the separate disciplines involved.
1. Environmental
2. Street Improvements and Drainage
3. Bridge - Structures
4. Survey
5. Traffic and Signing
6. Geotechnical
The basic approach for each of the disciplines follows the Scope of Work as
developed in the RFP as supplemented by detailed approaches.
The SCOPE OF WORK to be done by the consultant to the satisfaction of the City
shall consist of the following tasks:
1. Perform detailed topographic survey at 1" = 20' with 1 foot contour
intervals for use in preparation of all project plans. Detailed cross
sections are to be prepared at 25' spacing and included as part of the
street improvements plans (horizontal scale: 1" = 20', vertical scale:
1 " =4')
2. Prepare preliminary plans, based upon Alternative I of the Project Design
Report, for environmental review and the Environmental Initial Study.
The work shall also include preparation of a complete environmental
document pursuant to N.E.P.A. requirements for the area which is
southerly of the Orange County Flood Control District (F10) Channel
right-of-way. It should be noted that the remaining portion of the
project has been covered by a previous environmental document processed
under Tract No. 8763. In addition, the document shall address issues
related to noise, aesthetics, and visual impacts to the Peppertree
Residential Community located to the west of the proposed road.
The Environmental Tasks required shall also include the development and
conducting of a complete public input program aimed at community and
public agency awareness of the project. The public input program shall be
consistent with N.E.P.A. guidelines and requirements.
3. Prepare complete street improvement plans (ink on mylar, 1" = 20'
scales). The plans shall include but not be limited to construction of
the following: Curb and gutter, sidewalk paving, street lighting,
concrete block screen walls, as well as modifications to existing Edinger
Avenue.
4. Prepare complete storm drain improvement plans (ink on mylar, 1= 20"
scale) including all appurtenant facilities/structures. This work shall
also include preparation of a complete hydrology study and hydraulic
calculations in accordance with the City of Tustin standards and current
Orange County Hydrology Manual and the current hydraulic standards of the
Orange County Flood Control District.
5. Prepare complete bridge and associated structure plans (ink on mylar,
1" = 20' scale) per the Project Design Report Alternative I concept. This
work shall include all structural engineering necessary for the design.
6. Prepare complete traffic striping and signing plans (Tustin Ranch Road,
Edinger Avenue, Walnut Avenue) to accommodate the improvements (ink on
mylar, 1" = 20' scale).
7. Prepare complete landscaping and irrigation plans for the improved
rights-of-way (on myl ar, 1" = 20' scale) .
8. Prepare complete traffic signal plans (ink on mylar, 1" = 20' scale) as
follows:
a. Tustin Ranch Road and intersection of Walnut Avenue modification of
soon to be existing traffic signal.
b. Intersection of Tustin Ranch Road and Edinger Avenue - installation
of a new traffic signal.
c. Special provisions in accordance with City Standards.
d. Project coordination with the traffic sub -consultant, if one is
utilized.
9. Provide full coordination with all utility companies and affected
agencies/parties via certified mail, including any required permit
processing.
10. Provide complete documents for right-of-way acquisition (road, slope,
drainage, right of entry, temporary construction easements, etc),
including legal descriptions, exhibits, and computations. It should be
• noted that if required, or needed, the City of Tustin will contract
separately for appraisal services.
11. Provide geotechnical and soils engineering services for design and
construction including, but not limited to, the following:
a. Determination of shrinkage factors, infiltration/permeability of
existing soils, maximum allowable bearing pressure for foundations,
minimum embedment of footings below finished grade, allowable soil
pressure for wall s expansive characteristics, in place density and
relative compaction; surface and underground drainage, and
erodibility.
b. Recommendations for structural foundations; compaction of soils and
placement/alteration of necessary earth embankments/fills.
C. Submission of geotechnical report with a site plan showing boring
locations.
d. Observation by a qualified soils engineer or technician of subgrade
preparation and placement alteration as necessary with
embankments/fills.
e. Observation by a qualified soils engineer or technician of bridge
pile driving operations.
f. Compaction testing of backfill materials for such items as, but not
limited to: storm drains and utility trenches, structures, subbase
material, verification of pavement design sections based on subbase
strength and materials.
g. Full coordination with the geotechnical subconsultant, if one is
utilized.
12. Provide field construction surveying as follows:
a. Provide one set of stakes for rough grading purposes.
(1) Stake centerline alignment and grade of streets on 50'
stations.
(2) Stake curb alignment and grade of streets on 50' stations.
(3) Provide slope staking for all cut/fill-slopes.
b. Provide one set of "blue top" stakes for fine grade purposes.
(1) Stake centerline alignment and grade of streets on 25'
stations.
-- (2) Stake curb alignment and grade of streets on 25' stations.
(3) Provide slope staking for all cut/fill slopes.
C. Provide one set of stakes for bridge construction:
(1) Stake horizontal and vertical control for pile locations.
(2) Stake horizontal and vertical control for abutment locations.
(3) Stake horizontal and vertical control for bridge structure
alignment.
(4) Stake horizontal and vertical control for miscellaneous
bridge and other appurtenant facilities.
d. Provide one set of stakes for construction of storm drains.
(1) Stake alignment and grade for all conduit fl owl i nes,
headwalls, and wing walls.
(2) Stake alignment and grade for all manholes, catch basins, and
junction structures -- two stakes each.
e. Provide one set of stakes for alignment and grade for the placement
of telephone facilities, power vaults, street lighting, traffic
signal pole(s), chain link security fencing, irrigation main
installations and/or relocations, and other appurtenant item
locations and/or relocations.
f. Provide standard monumentation and appropriate centerline tie notes
at the completion of construction for the following:
(1) Street centerlines
(2) Property corners
13. Prepare the bid package, inclusive of general and special provisions, for
bidding and construction in accordance with the standard City format.
14. Prepare preliminary and final detailed construction cost estimates for
the various bid items.
15. Provide assistance to the City during the construction phase to clarify
the intent of the plans and specifications, review and approval of all
shop drawings, and provide design assistance if changes to the project
are required during this phase.
The City of Tustin will be responsible for the following:
1. Provide all available existing data, information, reports, records and
maps available in City files such as design plans for adjacent and
existing improvements, soil reports, and surveys which may exist.
2. Provide all required copies of plans and specification for the project b
id documents.
3. Provide a Project Manager/Contract Administrator and Construction
Inspection.
Construction Services: �� K
It is suggested that the Construction Services be deferred the project is
clearly defined and developed.
Michael Brandman Associates Environment';; C orn-han, e ■ Plannin-,, ■ Resources
February 6, 1990
Mr. Dick Neal
Moffat & Nichol
250 West Wardlow Rc ad
Long Beach, Californh- 90807
SUBJECT: Proposal to Prepare Environmental Documentation for the Proposed Tustin Ranch
Road Extension
Dear Mr. Smith:
Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) is pleased to submit this proposal and fee estimate for the
preparation of environmental documentation for the proposed Tustin Ranch Road Extension. The
following scope of work is based on the request for proposal received on January 25, 1990, and
telephone conversations with you and city staff.
SCOPE OF WORK
MBA's approach to the environmental documentation for the proposed project is to prepare a
preliminary environmental assessment (PE k) :n accordance with the Department of the Navy
instructions (OPNAVINST) and an Initial Study in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). MBA will combine the PEA and the Initial Study into one document by
utilizing the CEQA checklist and providing a narrative discussion for each environmental topic.
This approach is based on previous environmental documentation that MBA has prepared for
projects requiring both federal and local decisions. MBA recommends an initial meeting with the
project team, City of Tustin, and the Department of the Navy (Navy) to discuss the recommended
environmental documentation to confirm whether it is the desired approach.
Task A: General Coordination/Project Definition/Meetings
This initial task provides an opportunity for the consultants, city staff, and the Navy to discuss the
details of the proposed project and the approach to the environmental documentation. This task
includes finalization of a complete project description and a project schedule indicating specific dates
for completion of tasks. We have also budgeted for two meetings with city staff/project team/Navy
that are recommended at (1) project initiation and (2) receipt of city/project team/Navy comments
on the draft PEA. Additional meeting attendance can be accommodated on a time and materials
basis.
2530 Rcd Hill Avenue. Santa Ana, California 9' 705 (-114)25,--5555 Fax: (714) 250-5556
Santa Ana • Los Angeles • San Diego Honolulu
Mr. Dick Neal
February 6, 1990
Page 2
Task B: Draft Preliminary Environmental Assessment (PEAVInitial Study
MBA will prepare a draft PEA in accordance with Navy instructions (OPNAVINST 5090.1) and an
Initial Study in accordance with CEQA Guidelines (Section 15063). MBA will combine the PEA
and the Initial Study into one document by utilizing the CEQA environmental checklist and providing
a narrative discussion for each environmental topic. The narrative discussion will identify the
significance of the project's effect on each environmental topic. This approach will allow the Navy
to determine whether additional analysis, in the form of an environmental assessment (EA) or
environmental impact statement (EIS), is required or if a categorical exclusion. or Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) could :)e issued for the project. This approach will also allow the City
of Tustin to determine whether an tavironmental impact report (EIR) or negative declaration (ND)
is required. Should an ND be in order, MBA's approach will minimize the effort needed by city staff
to adequately document and process an ND. This scope of work assumes the preparation of the
PEA and Initial Study only. Should an EA, EIS, or an EIR be required, this scope of work will need
to be amended.
A PEA is an initial evaluation of the potential effects of the proposed project on the environment.
If the PEA identifies no significant impacts or substantial environmental controversy, no additional
environmental analysis would be needed and a categorical exclusion of FONSI could be issued for
the project. However, if the PEA identifies significant impacts or substantial environmental
controversy, or if the Navy determines that a more detailed analysis on the proposed project is
needed, additional analysis in the form of an EA or EIS on the project may be necessary.
The PEA/Initial Study will include a discussion of each environmental topic. Following is a discussion
of the scope of work for the potentially sensitive environmental issues.
Transportation - MBA will review existing traft.z documentation provided by the City of
Tustin such as future traffic conditions for Post -2000 that are based on forecasts prepared
by Austin-Fousts Associates.
oise - MBA will identify existing and future noise levels along the Tustin Ranch Road
extension alignment. Existing and project -related noise levels along Walnut Avenue and
Edinger Avenue adjacent to the Peppertree Residential Community will also be analyzed.
MBA will monitor existing noise levels at one location along Edinger Avenue and one
location along Walnut Avenue adjacent to the Peppertree Residential Community. Based
on the Post -2000 traffic conditions forecast by Austin-Fousts Associates, MBA will determine
potential future noise levels utilizing the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Highway
Noise Prediction Model. Mitigation measures such as noise walls/berms will be recommended
to reduce potential significant impacts to noise levels that do not exceed the City of Tustin
noise ordinance.
Aesthetics/Views - MBA will describe and photo -document the existing aesthetic character
of the project site and particular emphasis will be placed on key views from the existing
Peppertree Residential Community located northwest of the project site. A discussion of
Mr. Dick Neal
February 6, 1990
Page 3
potential impacts of the project on the aesthetic character of the project area and the
potential visual effects that could be experienced by the residents of the Peppertree
Residential Community will be provided. Mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce
potentially significant visual effects of the project on the aesthetic character of the project
area and the views from the Peppertree Residential Community.
Cultural Resources - RMW Paleo Associates will be retained to conduct an archaeological
investigation in accordance with the Department of the Navy Instructions Section 106 for the
portion of the project site located on the Tustin Marine Corps Air Station. RMW Paleo
Associates will conduct a literature rev.;ew and research, a walk -over survey, and a brief
memorandum report. The remaining portion of the project site has been disturbed, and MBA
assumes the remaining portion has been previously surveyed and no significant archaeological
resources are present.
Other Issues - The other environmental topics listed on the CEQA environmental checklist
will be briefly and qualitatively reviewed to demonstrate no significant impacts would occur
to these topics. If significant impacts are identified requiring more detailed analysis of any
of the other environmental topics, this scope of work could require an amendment.
Task C: Public Participation Program
MBA will establish a public participation program to inform federal, state, and local agencies and
interested citizens of the proposed project and elicit public input on environmental concerns related
to the proposed project. MBA will conduct two public meetings --one open to the Peppertree
Residential Community residents and one open to federal, state, and local agencies and interested
citizens. The purpose for the public meeting with the Peppertree Residential Community is to elicit
specific environmental concerns from the nearest sensitive area to Lie project site. The City of
Tustin will post and/or publish a notice for both public meetings in accordance with
OPNAVINST 5090.1. At both meetings, MBA will describe the proposed project and the potential
impacts associated with its implementation. MBA will incorporate the input provided at the two
public meetings into a final PEA/Initial Study.
Task D: Final Preliminary Environmental Assessment (PEAVInitial Study
After review of the draft PEA/Initial Study by the City of Tustin, the Navy, and the project team, and
receipt of oral and written comments from the review and the public meetings, MBA will make
revisions and/or additions consistent with the agreed-upon scope of work and incorporate them into
a final PEA/Initial Study. The budget assumes that one cycle of the comments and revisions is
needed to finalize the document. The intent of the final PEA/Initial Study is to allow the Navy to
determine whether the proposed project falls within a categorical exclusion, is approvable with a
FONSI, or requires further analysis in the form of an EA or EIS. The final PEA/Initial Study would
also allow the City of Tustin to determine if an ND is appropriate for the project or if additional
analysis in the form of an EIR is necessary.
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PHASE I
This will be the information, data gathering and preliminary engineering phase
of the project. During this phase, background information required to develop
the preliminary plans will be assembled for use in the environmental review and
Environmental Initial Study.
Information from the topographic survey will be utilized to prepare project
base sheets at a scale of I"=20' with one foot contour intervals. The roadway
alignment and limits of improvements based on the proposed typical street cross
sections will be shown to indicate the relationship of the project to the
surrounding improvements. This information will be utilized in the
environmental review to assist in the analysis of the noise, aesthetics and
visual impact issues.
Coordination with the affected utility companies and agencies will begin under
this phase of work. This will ensure that their concerns and requirements are
identified and provided for the preliminary plans and that long lead items with
regard to permit processing are identified and addressed.
PHASE II
This will be the final engineering phase of the project. Information collected
from subconsultants, the environmental review and Environmental Initial Study,
affected utility companies and agencies will be used to prepare the final plans,
specifications and cost estimates for use in the bid package.
Plan and profile sheets showing street improvements will be prepared at a
horizontal scale of 1" = 20' and vertical scale of 1" = 4'. Grading and
demolition plans showing final grading limits and elevations will be prepared
at a scale of 1" = 20'.
The existing and proposed heights of fill for this project range from 0' to more
than 20'. Because of this, the detailed cross sections taken at 25' intervals
will be will be prepared at a horizontal scale of 1" = 20' and vertical scale of
1" = 4'. The proposed street improvements will be added to these cross sections
to show the relationship between existing and design conditions. Earthwork
limits and quantities will be developed from this information.
Storm Drain Improvements
A complete hydrology study for the project area will be prepared by DMc
Engineering design of the storm drain system. The hydrology study and the
hydraulic calculations used in the determinations of inlet locations and sizes,
and pipe sizes will be prepared in accordance with the City of Tustin and OCEMA
standards.
Storm drain improvement plans will include plan and profile views of all new
lines and laterals, and plans and details of all points of connection and
modifications of existing facilities where required.
Project Approach and Scope of Work
Bridges and Structures:
The AT&SF Overhead Bridge Structure is presently conceptualized as a three span
structure as noted in the Design Report. The main span over the railroad is
159'-111
, requiring a 6'4" depth of structure. It is shown as a cast -in-place
box girder structure. This will require falsework near the railroad tracks and
of course formwork over the tracks.
As an alternate, the railroads normally prefer precast -concrete or steel
girders over their tracks in order to minimize the affects of construction over
an operating railroad. This particular trackage has between 20 and 22 trains
per day. This can have some impact on the selection of the bridge type.
The use of precast girders and adjustment of spans can allow a reduction of
profile grade, which -can reduce the grades on the southerly ramp and provide a
flatter -safer intersection.
In addition, the southerly ramp will be on a high superelevation. Because of
this, approximately two-thirds of superelevation of the southerly end of the
bridge structure must be superelevated. This resulting structure will have a
very high "reveal" or elevation exposure because of this superelevation, and
the bridge may appear to be six feet deeper than the deck thickness.
Moffatt & Nichol would propose in the Phase I. environmental/preliminary phase
that Bridge Type Selection Study be accomplished. We believe the spans, span
arrangement and type should be reviewed in order to reduce the costs, provide a
lower profile and reduce the cloverleaf ramp grades if possible.
Our approach will be to review the basic requirements with the railroad in order
that the minimum depth structure can be obtained commensurate with their
requirements.
Phase I additionally will develop the needs for the 1500 feet of sound wall that
may be required on the west side of the Tustin Ranch Road.
It is conceived that the soundwalls will require some architectural treatment
or textured treatment because of the proximity of "Peppertree Homes." An
allowance has been made for the aesthetic considerations and the inclusion in
the PS&E.
Upon review and approval of the Phase I preliminary plans, Phase II, the
development of the structure PS& E will be done. Designs and plans will be
developed essentially conforming to AASHTO and Caltrans structure standards.
Upon completion, the structure will be reviewed under the Moffatt and Nichol
Quality Control Plan that requires an independent review of the designs,
estimate and specifications. An independent set of calculations and
specifications sealed by the registered engineer of review will be forwarded to
the Ci ty of Tusti n. In thi s phase the PS&E wi 11 be forwarded to The AT&SF for
their review and approval.
The Phase III construction services are relatively straight forward as outlined
in the Scope of Work. It is suggested that those services be deferred until the
project is completely defined and the construction period established.
DMC ENGINEERING SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1. Perform Detailed Topographic Survey: Research and review
record documents and As -Built plans in order to Pstablish
horizontal and vertical control. This control will be utilized in
the performance of the following tasks:
A. Field topographic Surveying
B. Aerial topographic Mapping
C. Digitized Field Data
D. Right -of -Way Documentation
In addition this survey will establish and/or confirm the
location of other physical features that may interfere with the
construction of the proposed improvements. Also required is the
mapping of all record utilities in or traversing the project site.
Accurate drawings of utilities in the project area may not exist.
Therefore, part of this survey effort will provide field data to
assist in preparation a reliable set of Utility drawings. -This will
have a future value as a description of existing conditions.
The drawings that will be compiled from this initial survey
will provide the necessary base sheets for all improvement drawings
•that are part of the Tustin Ranch Road Extension Project.
Task 2. Prepare Preliminary Plans: For this task DMc will
accomplish preliminary work for Right -of -Way documents and for the
Hydrology and Hydraulics analyses. This effort will include the
determination of the location of the R/W boundaries and a
description of parcels that will be involved in the land exchange
between the City and the U.S. Marine Corps. The preliminary
Hydrology and Hydraulics effort will determine the impacts on the
existing drainage channels.
Task 4. Prepare complete Storm Drain Improvement Plans: The DMc
effort in this task will be to provide all Hydrological and
Hydraulic data required to support the Moffatt & Nichol design
effort and preparation of the storm drain improvement plans.
Task 10. Provide complete documents for right-of-way Documents:
This task will provide the effort necessary to complete Right -of -
Way Documentation and preparation of slope and Temporary
Construction Easements.
Task 12. Provide field construction surveying: After bid and award
of the Construction contract, the consultant will provide field
construction surveying and other construction phase services on
behalf of the City. These services will include specifically:
Clarification of the intent of the plans and specifications; Review
and approval of all shop drawings; design assistance if changes to
the project are required during the construction phase and
construction staking. The construction staking task will include
the horizontal and vertical location for the construction of the
following work efforts:
A. Rough grading for streets
B. Fine grading for streets
C. Bridge Construction
D. Storm Drain Construction
E. Miscellaneous Utilities
F. Monumentation
Task . The coordination of the engineering and design work with
the U.S. Marine Corps will be an ongoing effort from the outset of
the project. This effort will involve discussions and meetings
between the City, The Irvine -Company, Local Marine Activities,
Headquarters Marine Corps, Western Division of NavFac, and NavFac
Headquarters. The DMc effort will be to facilitate the
communications between the design team, the City and the Services.
KIMLEY-HORN SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following proposed scope of services addresses three general traffic engineering aspects of the
design project:
1) street lighting plans;
2) traffic signing/striping plans; and
3) signal design plans.
Task 1 - Street Liehtine
Using base maps prepared by Moffatt & Nichol which show proposed street improvements and
utilities, Kimley-Horn will prepare street lighting design plans including the following features:
- pole and foundation location/details;
- conduit and pull box layout; and
- service feed points and cable sizing.
Street lighting plans will be prepared under City standards for applying City -selected light fixtures.
Design of street lighting assumes that Southern California Edison, through its franchise agreement
with the City of Tustin, will prepare appropriate conductor sizes and schedules. Kimley-Horn will
utilize this provided circuitry information to size conduit and pull boxes for street light fixtures.
Utility information on base mapping is expected to show electrical vaults to be used as service drop
points. This proposal assumes that the City will document fixture and pole type, mounting height,
and luminaire/lens requirements. Given 1" = 20' scale requirements, street light plans for
approximately 4,000 feet of new roadway and 1,000 feet of Edinger and Walnut approaches will
require six (6) 24" x 36" plan sheets using over -and -under plan sheet layout.
Task 2 - Traffic Signing/Striping
Using similar base mapping as prepared for Task 1 by Moffatt & Nichol, traffic control devices and
pavement markings will be designed by Kimley-Horn for this project. Caltrans and Orange County
EMA standards will be utilized in the preparation of these designs with items shown to include:
- pavement markings (lanes, arrows, crosswalks);
- signing (parking, regulatory, warning); and
- information/directional as appropriate.
Given 1" = 20' scale requirements, traffic signing and striping plans for 4,000 feet of new roadway
and 1,000 feet of Edinger and Walnut approaches will require six (6) 24" x 36" plan sheets using over -
and -under plan sheet layout.
Task 3 - Sienal Design
Using the same base mapping as provided by Moffatt & Nichol in Tasks 1 and 2, Kimley-Horn will
prepare traffic signal design plans for.
- Tustin Ranch Road/Edinger (new signal); and
- Tustin Ranch Road/Walnut (modification).
Design plans will be prepared at I"= 20' scale using Caltrans and City of Tustin standards and format.
Redesign of the Tustin Ranch Road/Walnut signal assumes that the City will supply base mapping
and as-builts of the existing design to Kimley-Horn. Field verification of existing underground
equipment is not anticipated as part of redesign efforts. Controller timing is not included in this
proposal.
Task 4 - Miscellaneous Activities
Kimley-Horn will prepare special provisions for items designed in Tasks 1, 2, and 3 as determined
necessary by Kimley-Horn. The special provisions will include bid tabs for items designed in Tasks
1, 2, and 3. Kimley-Horn will prepare a list of quantities and an estimate of probable construction
costs in support of the total bid package prepared by Moffatt & Nichol. Draft Special Provisions will
be submitted with 60% design plans. Final special provisions will be coordinated with the final design
plan submittal.
This scope of services assumes that design efforts for Tasks, 1, 2, and 3 will coordinate with 30%,
60%, 90%, and final design submittals for the entire project. Kimley-Horn will attend up to five (5)
project meetings with City staff and/or design team staff during the course of this project.
KIMLEY-HORN SCHEDULE
Kimley-Horn will complete efforts in Tasks 1, 2, and 3 based upon the following submittal schedule:
30% design - completed within 30 working days of receipt of written notice -to -
proceed together with prescribed base mapping
60% design - completed within 20 working days of receipt of resolved comments on
30% submittal
90% design - completed within 15 working days of receipt of resolved comments on
60% submittal
100% design and
special provisions - completed within 15 working days of receipt of resolved comments on
90% submittal.
KIMLEY-HORN DELIVERABLES
Kimley-Horn will provide one set of reproducible originals for each submittal to Moffatt & Nichol
for reproduction of the entire package as deemed appropriate by Moffatt & Nichol.
benne
Design
Group
LANDSCAPE A S CHI T E C T U R
April 91 1990
(714) 852-0345.
PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN
Mr. Richard Neal
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers
P.O. Sox 7707
Long Beach, California 90807
RE: Landscape Architectural Improvements t to old TUatin
Ranch Road - Revised Proposal (Page one of four)
Dear Mr. Neal:
The enclosed is the revised proposal based upon our meeting
with the City of Tustin and yourself on April 4, 1990. We
look forward to working with Moffatt & Nichol again and to
have the opportunity of being part of a successful team of
consultants to the City of Tustin.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES PROPOSAL
Scope of Services
Review Exhibits "A« and "B" for the location of scope of
area for which the scope of services are to be performed.
1- Review sections written by others in Environmental
Initial study that reference to landscape design and
its relationship to ameliorating noise, aesthetics,
and negative views to and from the Peppertree
Residential Community. Provide review comments.
2- Prepare conceptual landscape plans for medians,
parkway, slope areas and connection ramp of
-o Tustin Ranch Road to Edinger Avenue. Plans shall
include location of major tree and shrub masses and
specification of planting palettes for the median, as
well as, the hydroeeeded slope areas for review and
approval prior to contract document preparation.
3- Prepare contract documents for planting and irrigation
plans for the improved right-of-ways at 1"z20' scale.
(This submittal does not include the cost if there is
the additional consideration of design around an
ancillary pump due to lack of water pressure at the
point -of -connection.)
F
"�Illllli
Landscape Architectural Services Proposal
April 9, 1990 Page two of four
Improvements to cold Tustin Ranch Road
Scope of Services Included Btlt;
To Be Megotiated At A Later Dot( -
Provision of construction administration services which
include, but are not limited to:
1.- Pre -construction meet:i,riq between City of Tustin,
Contracting Sup�Rrintendcnt, Landscape Contractor and
Landscape Archit.ect to review "checkpoint" stages
required once construction commences, the required
submittals as p(ir the spenifications, and establish
the standard choti.n of communication for submittals and
responses.
2- Rt -view irr igati:,n ma i nl i rw pressure test.
<- Review general t:`alth o1* plant material., spot check
all plant material larqtir than fifteen gallon, review
general plant pkacement.
4- Conduct c:overagc% gest. o.f irrigation heads after plant
material has be ,n placed on site,
5- 'Tach specimf!n mat r.r i,als .it_ nursery.
�- Conduct punchlitd. walkt trough at completion of
installation, bt:it pr i ox to the commencement of the
maintenance period.
7- Conduct final wrilthrough at: the completion of the
maintenance period, 14
During the constructs :)n admin i F;t,; ation phase, it will be
necessaxy to reviews�:l�mittal�such as the irrigation
materials list, any sobsititut.ioiis in plant or irrigation
materials, sail analy- Ls laboratory reports for fertility
,*,gainst. the materials ;.)r cavi r;c,:c*t :nd their quantities, etc.
HOURLY RATES
Principal $75.00
Landscape Architect/Project Man,.jger $65.00
Technician Draftsman $55.00
Office Administration/Delivexy $22.00
"'�Illllli
v
Landscape Architectural Services Proposal,.
April 9,, 1990 - Page three of four
Improvements to Old Tustin Ranch Road
WORK PRODUCTS/FEE SCHEDULE
Fee is based upon the provision of design drawings at 11t=20'
scale. The following sheets will be required for
construction drawings:
Conceptual Plan
1 sheet - 301lx42" plan view showing at 1"10' a
typical planting scheme layout for
300' lineal feet of roadway section
.including the median, parkway, and,
right-of-way slope.. A typical eleva-
tional section shall be provided at
1"-1/411. This drawing shall be
presentation graphics for public pre-
sentation and to appropriate decision--
making bodies.
1 sheet - 3011x42" plan view showing at 1"=30' a
.typical planting scheme layout for -
slopes along the connection loop ramp
and the interior planting area Created
by the loop. This drawing shall be
presentation graphics for public
presentation and to appropriate
decision --making bodies.
1 sheet - Presentation architectural rendering
of the view of the loop connection old
Tustin Ranch Road and Edinger''Avenue.
View shall be a low -angle bird's eye
view from a second story window of the
adJacent housing to the northwest.
Contract Documents
Irrigation
1 sheet - Plan view of intersection loop at Edinger
3 sheets- Plan view of median, parkway, and slope area
Planting
Landscape Architect has been requested not to provide
51141111
�7
Landscai�e Architectural Services Pro osa
April 9, 3.990 - Page four of pfour � _
Impr.ove'llents fi;c7 Clc� Tustin Ranch Road
a design that includes hydroseed, but rather
opecificaily lay::, out and labels all plant one
that
for all areas. marials
l sheet - plan view of intersection loo
3 sheets- Plan view of median, parkwaP at Edinger
y, and slope area
Details, Nates, and Ler;ends
i. :sheet - I
rrig;.+t10t1 dNt:ai 1S
1 sheet , Irzigatlon at*)d Planting Notes, Irrigation
Legend, PI-J"tilit7 List and Planting Details
10 sheets total for Contract daeuments
Total fee for C,.1,c-
RPndezing and Cept-ua.j E'lans/Elevations/Presentation
"Mtract Documents is $15.,400.00
If you have any questions ret4<{•rd ing this
'lot hesitate to contact Tne . oagain for proposal, please do
the Denne' Design Group on yo�rrateam ofcons including
consultants.
("cordially,
*(?eborah K. Denne' , ASI -A
Principal
A+ :ta,chment Exhibit "Al)
Exhibit "f3"
V
'A'r ".I.
3
EXHIBIT'B'
4-9-ao
rz6 7 1�,6 U r�A,L
�r2-•Il ciAN
s r
CS
Li
Cv�f .Mo tvnp Cd.Rr 4.0 awnp 0twn Wlr�cRJ • \
. .+o •wcr4n scenes co"69 a !. t tsww� eore.e+e ca It'.ea�arc USS
(d o+cR �WRw wfcfwc a Mc on *WOW cor►.o,aw 440wq•bct r.
rrrT1lSPE-911 t O • lY - r
n96 cs.le a $94 4.
l�
wfrt SMUT twm", N{fs To K town a! !r M bMOCR r�t1S.
Iz
r I
VA
I�I
1
i�
�.�f NA rtlA[I! •F
%me � R GYRO wA
S=M- OOMS1fi OI i•) f Ao..•tM ewi0rSTt, (q :r• +CCRLMI: MiC MO
I VA
S.)
14,1104A4 1YKRA0( jAMrjw0 %q sss Hums owR�frrr as or4m4w,
tMoce mcwja sour. CM or .vr, ro a*� lo•oe
v •y
GOY o/ mm. MWGLMA u �
DCPAATUM or ovem WMI
smv
s / rr.ewur Awt nwe tem=m Ave .... 9 . �.
Moffatt & Nichol Engineers
MAO -099
February 2, 1990
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Schaefer Dixon Associates
We will provide the necessary personnel, equipment and materials to perform subsurface
exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering analyses. We will also prepare a report of
our findings and design recommendations for the proposed improvements, and provide
consultation during the progress of our investigation.
To fulfill the objectives of the investigation, the following scope of work is proposed:
Field Exploration .
Our present plans for the field investigation include drilling a total of 13 borings ranging in
depth from five (5) to 80 feet. The locations of the borings are based on the stationing shown
on the previously referenced plans from the Tustin Ranch Road Improvement Study. The
anticipated boring depths and proposed structures for which the borings are intended to
provide data are shown in parentheses.
We plan to drill five (5) rotary wash borings for the proposed bridge foundations
and curved approach embankment at stations 7 + 00 (approach embankment, 30
feet); 20 + 00 (Abutment 1 and approach embankment, 60 feet); 21 + 00 (Pier 2, 60
feet); 22 + 50 (Pier 3, 60 feet); and 24 + 50 (Abutment 4, 80 feet).
We plan to drill four (4) hollow -stem auger borings for the proposed screen wall
foundations at stations 26 + 00 (35 feet); 31 + 00 (20 feet); 36 + 00 (20 feet); and
41 + 00 (20 feet).
We plan to drill four (4) hollow -stem auger borings to depths of less than five feet
at stations 29 + 00,34 + 00,39 + 00, and 42 + 50. These borings will be used to obtain
subgrade soil samples for the proposed grading and paving of Tustin Ranch Road.
The field exploration program will be supervised by an engineer from our office who will
maintain a log of each boring and classify the soils encountered in general accordance with
the Unified Soil Classification System. In general, our sampling procedure will consist of
alternating relatively undisturbed samples with Standard Penetration tests at intervals of
approximately five (5) feet. Near -surface bulk samples will also be obtained from the
hollow -stem auger borings.
Schaefer Dixon Associates
Moffatt & Nichol Engineers
MAO -099
February 2, 1990
Laboratory Testing
The soil samples obtained from the field exploration program will be tested in the laboratory
to evaluate the controlling engineering properties of the encountered subsoils.
Laboratory testing may include, but not necessarily be limited to:
Atterberg Limits
Moisture and Density
Shear Strength
Resistance Value
Consolidation
Geotechnical Investigation Report
Compaction
Soluble Sulphates
Resistivi ry, pH
Sieve Analyses
Based on engineering analyses of the field and laboratory data, a written report will be
prepared to aid in development of project plans and specifications.
The report will include a documentation of the boring and sampling locations, the
encountered soil conditions, and laboratory test results. The report will also evaluate the
types and engineering characteristics of foundation materials encountered. In addition, the
report will provide recommendations and conclusions regarding the following:
* A description of the encountered soil conditions, including groundwater depths
and the controlling engineering properties of the foundation soils, including boring
and sampling locations and testing results. The borings for the approach
embankment and bridge will be transmitted on a 24 x 36 -inch reproducible Log of
Test Borings.
* Engineering seismology and discussion of liquefaction potential, if applicable.
* Estimated design earthquake and associated seismic design criteria according to
CALTRANS requirements based on the 1987 peak acceleration obtained from
CDMG Map Sheet 45.
* Foundation design parameters, both axial and lateral, for adopted (or alternative)
foundation types and depths.
* Vertical and lateral stiffness coefficients, if desired.
* Anticipated settlement due to embankment loads.
Schaefer DixoAssociates
Moffatt & Nichol Engineers
MAO -099
February 2, 1990
* Construction and backfilling criteria for retaining walls, abutments and wingwalls,
if applicable.
* Recommended structural pavement sections based on traffic indexes furnished by
the City.
* Allowable gradient of slopes.
* Necessity of seismic approach slab.
* Special requirements for protection against corrosive soils.
Schaefer Dixon Associ
ANTICIPATED SCOPE OF SERVICES
Observation Qf M Installation
Based on our knowledge of the geotechnical conditions in the project area, we assume
that the proposed bridge over Edinger Avenue will be supported on driven precast concrete
piles. Consequently, it is anticipated that a representative from our office will be required
to observe the pile driving observations. We have assumed that approximately 100 piles will
be needed to support the bridge. Based on our experience with pile driving in the vicinity,
we have assumed that 20 to 25 piles can be driven per day. Therefore, we estimate that our
representative will be on site full-time for approximately five (5) days during pile driving.
After pile driving has been completed, we will prepare a written report summarizing our
observations of the pile driving observations.
Observation ml Testin During 51 Gmdin
Because the project is in a very preliminary stage of development, it is difficult to
determine the precise quantities of earthwork that will be required. We anticipate that the
grading operations for the project will include processing of subgrade and construction of
the approach fill embankment southerly of Edinger Avenue; processing of subgrade and
placement of fill along the existing Tustin Ranch Road right-of-way; backfilling of utility
trenches; and placement of pavement base material along the alignment of Tustin Ranch
Road. We estimate that it will require one technician from our office approximately one
month (i.e. 20 days) working full-time to observe these operations. During the grading
operations, our representative will take tests in the field as necessary to evaluate the com-
paction of the materials being placed. Laboratory tests will also be performed on samples
of fill materials during grading (e.g. R -value and ASTM D 1557). At the conclusion of the
grading operation, we will prepare a report summarizing our observations and the results of
field and laboratory tests.
SUMMARY
Moffatt and Nichol is uniquely qualified and especially interested in providing
the services for the Tustin Ranch Road Extension and Grade Separation at The
AT&SF tracks. This project will utilize design capabilities for which this firm
has been known for 45 years. Civil and bridge engineering has, and is still, a
major focus of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers business.
Moffatt and Nichol has assembled a team to supplement our capabilities in
specialty areas. The team members we have selected are locally oriented and
experienced in similar projects within the immediate area.
Essential qualities instrumental to the success of your project and which the
Moffatt & Nichol team can provide include:
•Concentrated engineering design experience in all aspects or civil ?nod
grade separation design.
• A core of professionals with unique, specialized experience in civil and
structural engineering design who are prepared to commit the time and
effort your project demands.
• Thoroughly familiar with PUC and The AT&SF regulations, procedures, and
policies.
• Proven success in the management of grade separation projects.
• Effective project management techniques.
• Demonstrated performance of municipal government contracts.
• All local team members with offices within 5 miles of the project.
• Familiarity with Military procedures as it may affect right-of-way.
Moffatt & Nichol recognizes this assignment will require a significant level of
effort and this firm is prepared to commit the resources necessary to meet this
end. The firm has available the necessary manpower to ensure timely
accomplishment of the project goals and we look forward to the opportunity to
explore our approach to the project in a personal interview. Your consideration
of the Moffatt and Nichol team is appreciated.
,
y. ,z � ":., . -. � . .- 7 - xd y ! S i- d 'E•;..1 ±st t - '. d .. 1
r
r
k -
r
- �..:... ,: -- _,.',.c• ...... r. .:,:.. ..... ,.. .;;, .�: .::•: . ,. :�t fat's, r vti..:. � -�Z'n
µ�_ .,y.,.. .. ::'-. .-, r' '.;:, .. �,. : ''� _ ::.� A:rr •f .a �%- �ss mtr s�i�.-et'.:,}
,rx.;-. .'�.,,:..W. -•.. ,....ti.t ,.;'...:, ...._-, ...,: •-.:- -. h• .`'b
r
.f ,Y'•s ;r-' .a...:: k,,r+'..` .:. -,: {ry ,,.:.,. .., -.. .. • 4_.i '.:�,,•tC: {, sic..a. `k",
,. .nr r •... ...., (( r.;• _. .i- f_• .. '. x _. . -;:�� :- , <:: R.. , s a ,,+--aTt „ : yr. �,',. . wrc 9 �'�eC'a'�t.t ,i--M.
, ... _. -. -.c i. ��-.,1, ♦. ..._ :. _. ; t .., . n. .t _. �F: 4 }� «;-�L Y`n, '�.ty, :.vi,' `,�" Nti.: _
.-T":�^'•. +, ;..� •�a.ry;': a{,� rM„- a ,•r t..,: iit�r, •''�L'fi ::�,'-^ii°'-`-• �'
...r.':'C-.. Y"''-•y'j �
3
y}d x. a{.3'P`i-..t•.a.P11";z t'' A ° 4 :d 7� - 7>K - 't"yyc,�" �:'t, •i .,x, i..> - f .fie ''rr•.:
.. ar "_'�'_:' ",✓'ti='., r.. ;, .+fir .pro E:, -•... ,h-� :'t.,t � �,e '�•�-,fcz•. iw..aE.t ' tom, a3'•f- _ �L�rr• - .r_ L� y.: >.
a.�.1 :`. t N'.. '`'.X��. � `tir;±�, x_,c•: _ r 2'.. ��' s`�SY.v:� '.. v�W. •w.s"�e:.
.t, �:k „ ' -a. � v .Y ,�' -M..a .�,• ,C' _ _ -ra _ .gw.. rA':��.1••.:._ •�;, 4'.t .�, ..+ ,r _ ,•9,[•. tet..
9.S�'
+,. ,- - - .... r}I' :: a >41 .«.:.k- .-. ,. ..r_ , >: - `-�" a•,. < °:1."^a'Fr.
WA
' ,, • --s- ..b .b, ., .�. •« '` _ . 7;. -�-r. s . , -Tr; * .d :4 - T w ..a, >£ w
, � .y^l}'-.; 4. _-.,.. ,?, - ,.. . - ✓� l.} _ :� - . -'':: ;:: ti r , Jr r �'''` , ti, _i . ".,Co. • f'%4 a 3;.r. -: l . ;�, ,
Y.,; � lr:.�:.. '1. *i' 4 {�'�'. .9•• � - �,v?, o4r ':�', � d � � Na'.: : !� .{t• k. '" 11 t ..'i.
, -
�l r;+t fi :M.s ? «,r nh`::, �s .� rr>-:.- t ..�.:d! ..�' ia•, :. a. ''!i t,�,_..
�
'-, ,: •'� tel, Ji ..:, .... •_;-,- _,�. ,.._. .,,,,<c>,�":a•s _..,.. _.- ... .it �..r 5 !
W "'�£ `. .y r. �'r,.t.. . >+-"' •T,.,,���t,., '�' T � r ,...,�.;s. ,,.ar •f
� ;w.-% .,, r-.4: J•�" <� Y'r ;.-sA�,<;- �+:" ,�«...':.
_ ... �.� --.Yk .,r::•„a -t' .- ?,, srr_..,-+ s.: - .-4 ., :.. ., �?.. '�`. '6 „r. -s. s Z`� +�'�5+, ;:�.i... x ::. vc.':�c.
. a :.,- >, � - � s . .•_,.<�.. '}��4� V.i'2,.:Y�.a.'• n S '�'. ".>t4 �:.•i',- L:';. i t :'-F4.�i,�Tni-;t''3" :d5,4�, .Y ti.•"N'yM '1^"•'�
- ,. ti '�.. •.. Tw r .:4 ': m, .. �,rz. ;, !1! .'i, ; :.:. _ Y'�,..'T+•`T+,"• ..i. .Ja �1hi`'i �• i':. ,.
... .,.,,�"t ,,.-- a - ".�'� ., a± 'y�'als? t ., .r,c-' , r ,::i ...i.,`'.�:,�,4c;• :'r -�.,, `�..t � .,ib.:. ^•'.°.
'. " F ::S '...."-:e :q, ":'• Lr�, R. f#�,'>'S:. l� ,=:..�._ t/'l<.. V E t,l - `� - o "_f: .. ��j :�4 � - �n;ya+iw.
" .'.t''1`, ^;s.. ,.� F.' _r`.r'�`?" �.`"i t• -.T?, 2 � •Ek aS:.3? ,^,•�' a
` .. ,.�..-C4 ..� _J�_p..r'••}.' ri;':,. '„',a*:.5ti',y-.5 .,' ,. _.-fDF .p.,�.y--�.s:4"+,,.. :Mt �f. �- a�.w ��C; .F� _ .i„ T� '>w
-.:
... .. K '- -,.. ;,�.::�is�.: s.:rR":8'...kxi.:,:-. �$!?4,a„ ,..:.t,zq•. .a,..a ..., .�. R;+*$? _i�E : s'Sa rS i S..J 4':.-:E•Sr, ..;r ><!i'.
.,:
.,.....�>--•.'::. .-::,:shat. _.-�•i:i ,ak _, '. ..., _, 5..::.- ,._. .;.1,.,. i,a' - .,.�..r - .Z•: ..s. },::.v.. :-+.r`� +'3:�j'wx
. .- . , ... 'g,.�^,1 ��.-nn_�... , t_':::. ...,a.:..:" : .... .,_.,.._ -,: '. -'h::� r rr i-. y .�` z ,. a i,-? „r� ,•" i ,. ' �dx t'iC- 4�N -
_ a
' ... _ . ..: .._. :.r .. :s_ - .-.. r-"... - ' � � � � '' � :.:. �< � � lam-:.:'...:< �( e. -:;t { FT; 4' r,e :..t '=.,Sai.�r•13XR
,, v' .'. Yi -. ,: b: - • .,.`d•.:r,s,�'c �, .-.s y..,k .,.r .t ,r- m b•.. -, -._.�. y- : ,. _ - ... '3. _ ' . f -:. '`:,'i`.. t.. i J '}i'�.Y: ,i...T •'R+ '
_
,bra, - ::x 6 * r i,x "d'i}-'^ '�'k.� i.:.>„Y-<� ,ti.,.• !i^;yr .1� IF �v+
.. ;. ,- , a.. , - .. _ :.::;. •. ,...':. .;., ., r xr �-;.(s��+r� , yw�.4 .,�•[ r �Nr'S1�'� s: , r•tl vF��rN'•a;. �S,.. e'y^r
:. :. " ,..:� �:n ..,:. ... ,r•r.�. -..,-i
r.., '.r:_ '... -,- S:i.- k , - E, _ ,- J`' ,fi z.y,,. .� $�• yw ,r•�, T '•'t' _ 7��
, L
' `' i _ xT T'"' '? •t ., zj 't ' �.'`- a , yy .A 4 '} r �yb ,b... ,y2E• �„t,!Y,•� r- �`.<
Y
v ,
t , r ,} +,,.,. Y,{, f `+ ,x.. re L'-tE•frw'�i
- c �~� '� .1 • a '�'` \_ _ -� �:�.. } ,F.. .�{ "*.fir St'x zdk t,': t rS�µF4.
,. .. :_. ro t.S .,..-:- .... ... ��-.+ _,... , ., � r-: �.>x,.l• n ..:x '�q•S .:., ,'_ .•,i .:q 7 w`.rh`>: p _.Z."` at' has '-';-_a A:z ec�V,
;..a,-_» � ..:--" �z ,.., :.:.., k^ -�-- -,; ,; :.,•r.... .,.�+...,. {. ::.::. ,*g-,"4 fir. : �� t,« �ii ✓ t.. x,„� j :c.?^ �,
::a -- .- :::.. .. .. �a<r. ...r..-.•.;-... -r. • :.:+ ,. s .Az'' ,;::. <. ..-..`` ...g'�'. .".SL't.:.rva as-�., :.� ,t -r,.r: ^�_'� `s�ac k'�C» :«�r:-
„k ,:,. -:.E , ,,, ::`s ..,. < ... t �,..>', k) 2:,+.;• ;;dr�xa .�,C-.� F'z~,-�`t=.t -+i._ ,�: f '�F: kr,� s c. .to-
,. A ;r., :F '#'. f'.,, -•_ , - -... 1 y,# _... <:. 3:: � I �, F..:. b sE :N`.x't. +,i{- �� f Cd ': a,-rT �.
- � w. _H.i-'o -t :.. -.: ,.,:.may ....� 4: �. .. , .�_=: ♦ .. ,:.''-_�:..t ,.,3 S`-±M c _ v,' .y, , a,. 7y.s +�`,%ir
! t t'«' - � :. J �,r'w sa � 'Sw _ i. a '� >s- f„,b�. -'�, tra r c : a'• ,� x.. T.v "ji`2 n� ��°�c, sr_.,.
r .,� F Io i �•� v -'�s� � -(%' - � tYr»�• � t 'rir, :n ar• y s,?. ".c4 -
... -, . :,.. - .,� � .. .: . .» .. , n "+. . , :.. i .r-. <>• .v3:::� ,:r .� .t r'' � �� s r.. ;,r •"" ar ,+ ° •.. ri� �S. �-� .+�' . a .�/:.. �, dF :t. dt,.!. ,+�`'l.c'''9'�.•
,a
Y
,. •:',:, w ..-s: _. �" -} ,..: > ,-'"' -:_., `-...' .. ,,. ,...eft: -.f 7 a1 ta; •'>'a 4 ,..,,y, r., 1+� .;.�:.' .: "t. �'i{'"W '. r," aa.,y; c:•r
, , . , ,� -,, .: a ,� .. } x . s .: _..; � y - - + ,t„ K,:,�+ , ; -'. rn, ° < .xr ,va;,W.: r ,..+s- •"� �^'•,+$^ .:;er�rt �, r l: "F a t
.._:. i. y :; . , .S. � .._ •g,r' •-. ,•<: ± ..r.: ,, . -.: �:. .: ..: A5-il�"1:. KS -.. i.. - i,is ^k , F `i'' ' k,. �'T..f 'Y'._ : t S �i� i
y , -
2 •'`r }. _r "R' 3 -- .-, i.;,, , .:'.':.., w ^-S ;«s P.' - "'' ,,, f+.,,rl 4 :_ ? �, Y� *: t ..t, Y- � ° ''S i _ 3
' i S
.. ,,ta waF'. '•..+•a` �,•: Cyr _...,. ,-mti L � �. x ,C l�� �+!',m J'.=. n } A s �\ ?
fir;-
p : f t 'r. + x^*A`Rs•,. fir_ r r , •�. r f.. J.-a.:�, a y 'i;'":'�& S l r'':.:
,
- i `K •, ,.S a L ''tiri vf' .'4 'F �' .. .� c. 14.. `,L, .'�t#` r:'
.:� v i P h. ..t. .h.y` k wC'..:rr,- 'a, k� `�' -7t3 :+u :, -Y�L - .a +n ,.•y
,•. e.y ,,.,:.a. ,e .0 'e f ;. .__.. � � `r- -'.. . , ,. ,�.lE .,hL �_.:':.''cati,M. .i.•r., t.w,�"' '. �� .�:..��.�"� �w!' 4, e-,< �,,. .,-;yc>Se ,ar,, 7... _�-....,;.
, .- .:. ,.-., ,. .. ,...w. :.. . .-. _ . ,,.. ,: ..-. , ,.. , . � .- , v:Y/'. �i }, tk. ,r' Vf '•'d:i x y ..!' s••, ,, �: .>M:
_. v'1+. ,A,..'?':..,Y .'. .'7...a n. ..?k..� A: .:•"; :...,v t' .-, r �,C, ,M1 tJ„C,7. t+ �°,._. i. � :...!/ ..,._. .,...:.. ,... K`<,d , v, �, t e�'�'..�--Ai Gr'%f"1.1 A:.� .�Yi :n J+ - Y K�t. f, ,
,...;:.. �`�... �.._:_ )t,:.. G,. .. :.yy#-!9, a.-. .. .-- ...:' 3 4., .� � n:. ..:', ,. . ,.. . -Y. ,.:. Se, :.-.. 4 "• a. .� °",:4 "+'h;- ',�,•.. ..sY:i^.^. �ejl. 3"
..:. ,. .. _. ... .. .,. s .,... ..,,, •: , ....,:. ...a,+:...^ri � _ r. .+ _. . "t , ... ;, .. ,.: :; Y,.ls aa. M„ s. "r^'. . . Ye bE :; H. ,v ,% -
.. .,. ,.: t•a:. '.5. Y., ....."'. i-: . - .,:. ,.n .c..,�. }, ,. F .. _.. ,.,_ . �:, '.. .: .-, t r „ .,. J �., �: ':Ak� ,,a. ev:> S.r : �✓, td. 7. "-ii ��{ �A .eR ,� c�i¢"{r k'}�_,.
.' "*, .',f .,. i , ,.•.'T- .. .,.. r_ r, %; 4 ,:h , . -.�' . - s... .. -,^,� .,_... �... �.. ..'.!4E# K4.'. f 5+ ti`�ap : ..., :};3p"- . ;y^'�f�`' :+4Ti .?£ ,}' ,! "e`!'�' Y;,t , - � W
- � t.,.-.. ±. ..-. -: :+*3. r{ -.. ., _. .,.. �. .,h �;'� 'v,. r..'ae.. ,. f> .p ;{.,,. ..-:. '�` '��^ :w:•.. , ,.s-..�"„i' :. ->`.� ,-S: i•.ww _.G ic, _'&R�,7�i�rp s•,M„ .:: 'y7%v- *Ft' g-
:{ y. , .. T x>:-..• ]],, �,��•,,...�++.a, :'"r.' s,.' - ,`L:'%Ya,'�`, .-,.....� ..v:. ,,'-.�,,.. ..,�`....«. :::r �•wr R x.�s.- -'a:: s:��'"'=`.`,'g9r- iS-,:.•;-.<,-t" �.,il"'� .,s.-SS":.t. €,-- x <r;,.:,.
:...a - +r:. - �3" C ' .. .v .F'...'�'+ ,+v ,._.: - ., �.. ., a �'.. •3 � 5� ts:• �'; ..... ���� ,a-�' :..•r.•� .�,>,.., + •� F mar - ,:.�'i
,. ...1'"� .,._��.{�t,.,-. ry<, r:s. �.,.... ,.. :)�:F'>. .i -<: z-..,. ,:r:. .. t. ,.:,. y, fl -. ^,.Y:. r,<'7 ,"EaY'" .�y���'�•!'' "�. -.."ty ,�• ..,�„4 ,y}� b,y�,. �.'Ja' -.wr
.:;_.,�.?. :-, �.`.R^'.T. -r0 :.. ) .. .. ,,. :. .-... _ .r� .r-�':.�M:+: :l - ..+i,. ,.3'V �t�d,. :,S$"� k'-.i6r ' ...M--•, ..i �.x•,ib'
'rr, .L. `-- k.. z •.,ta„n' •.,L'.. :,d,a. ..w. ., wa. ,.�r*q,..+„ _- o..y ,d4 .. •s. TrS{.. <.,. - -` t...?�.: �':{�` ..+, 1 : � '`Y." o'±:
.. >...#T` .vuR {±.. ,. -,. .... - ,.- ,.. _ •.`.F,Y-_.. ?ti:.r.;vz....:, ,,.,. -' :. i:. '"� ! :.�� f '+�£�'. .. W `.i.,, .i^Pr:. r`{.
- �..,:,. .. .)a-.,. �..v o �,,p,.. ..c.. ,:..•4v:. •r_... ._... .",�%. •�•::�t�. - F., .'.g s`' c' ..a._,.'.�'a,`i vo=+a�7EJ.-v".t..: s; �' �p7...,x:i�'k��75��� e '�-wff.;..
- .:.. , J •4).•. ,.. +,x:^ t f ... .c-F'1V: ., '3',.� ,'V,E•:: . -,.. ..�, ...,., ,.,, 1:1... �=';: r, ' , ��•,....., e'�". j+ K�-� ''hsTi.... �'l t' ^`,�4' -, FF�ii'� Eyy�e�!
s. «. _ .a. 'h� _i �`., y. +w �;-�' .; �,. .. K ,-.: a;:� e. . _. c'" ti.., 4 ,g, ,.. _. . `�'i,,. _ , ,...ti:.. -a, .:.a - - '•'. M :_i 'aryl- � �;i:;�<��'•
;... „ 4.. a,.. _. , . 1,, AP'y ,, .-{ °£ -•:p1- „ _ b^ rr,,, , , ,, , , , ,,, ri:t .. .� ��- r 'rte F -' St : ,r � rs w .d _ f�
r .....:i ..,. ,.. � .._. .,+. ,,,. ,,` ,-.: -:.. :-. k:� .: - a...., ._ _ i ,{.. r_ ,�t fix. ,}. ,:.£ 5 #-,..r•. ;.v'St ': �:x aiev..
. « 7� ..: � ..,.� ,., :., .. :.:'s. '.' ... -.,.. _ "�,�:�i?S. ✓�.+in '`�> P ,.,1 •s4,w7 �{y.l _ ..'^4 ...k.,..: �U v T ,4• ;:-`•.
ps V, _,• - ,, ,. i ... ,,..,.r. ::.:. .. p. tra Y• s' -.:,r '4. �:: r^�t r.-. '< r $ "}j ;+,r.' ,ar',',;'H 'F'.i
„ 4
:.: �:. ....,.r.... .,. .�,::, ..� :..i :;�,_- .�:. :, .'�.: =Y• _ xs. ,S =ii.'s rWi, Frlr 3�::.=z�'.
., } .,",ra ,r,.k."' ''�"a4 ...'�` t �„'. i:. ,.. .a,..': % :„'?.t.' s '•�- is rtyg . t.' a a a: . $t' >. •'w, -ti:* s:ti r 't ° .',{'�
S /
':. _... ..; _ ., ... .. ..... .1 S. ,..♦ '_:.
3' „
, a , r. , -,� ' :? ,m. ;.. c f. C_ia., r -u a �.i ::,.x. ;" - . F "•.�,' �" ',L'kX. '>
.,,-t" e;,,,..es ,.:'':.. •: - t �... ..w -.. .,K . a: :.=tA..
..'-a.., -.,,. ,..- ,.. c... r.,,...k�:... .z ,^i -:.-r, :v, p,, 4..-.-,t.. .s -.:s• �. -'XtY.ts_..:.',�
.: ,,....:.._-, ... ,,. 5.. _.:- ,.,..: >. ,.. ,.. u. •-�, -:, 'z z,. u,�_ ls:.:.. .i:.
a- ,_,......: .. +., . , .,, r,<.; vi,...-"k 3. .a.<,.,. . -; <v „ r ,v^ ,� j .. .�{'�:. � y; cJ .•.x'�¢r'�c�q-fir rww.,t-tc•-'• «r. a ,d� t +m+*' �.X.
_.. :. f .F l 1 .............. ..7.:... �':.. .: ,r. ^. .3'1 iM. �•. ,. .+•-e ,. :.d � 'rY -:..: �S ✓•'Y,-
.:�` .., ,,...,.: ., .. { ,w•:. :..:: ,.,.r, ,_... ,. ,-.., X.r�.{_. ,. -,Y v"s:7a. ,,_ ,_ .1•r,. ....,t. �, ,.0 .,s' r ;..r a x, .,w .r,�` x ,�Y ..r. '4'., _:..°^.
.. .. : :.-,_ ..,,t ... 7f,.> a. .. �. .'»x' ,..t ,, ... -.. , :.a." w5+ ^.'w4.* :�4..r •.�., ... o a'^ .� .ns: '7:==,
t-...., t , ->w , ..,1... :-.,, r... " ...... ah..: ..�. ..'�, ::lq. nr .: _ .ter.. r•. , , . - .. ::,. r � tr:.. J.,. ,-:bid x ::.�4^. - •,y' :ri:_
... , ,. r ,. >f. ,...' �r,Y", ., r'.d�,u �'� ' •=c;'. c � p 4�=-"E , rr�t #'a� x , � .:� .�• 3' t'.3. t-. s
_... ry-..:, �. 5,-...:..:. :..':., .... ...'r. .z .. lr. .. ..kk .,,rA 1,._�x,, ,:. .: ,.. ,. _•__ ...,. ..:.. y^..�.• 'yy� i�'W" g...Y• :.I^"; >t .,i�� i; `�w', x- vIL+ ,ti:..�
.:.: ✓. ..:, .. ",.. v .! ,• , � -+Y.. ....,.. - :kta ,, '.. ' .. «h i :.. , h .N .. �M .i. : 1'eY ." t� 3`� `#:YY} Y. '•Y �r t« a' i�'. i9�'.
.' .. R .. ..:.. ,%. ... , y. .,. :.. ,. ..,, :... ..a •: r, ±i. .,.: a ti4 .. . ,r .:-:......, ,�[ ..9 Y' +..�- ; ..,2E"� i w<+ ++? i•1''. ;It :b •�'•:
'_ .f..-: .. . ., ., ..,a. f... 4-ar" , t -'sem}, . ::,<.. _ .,�.,a .. ..a, -f, 1� .1r1.N-. '.: "fir-�'P .s-- :'l. :t--•
. '. •y .°�. .,..�' .. z., . ,,.- , ..:: .. ..,.,. •.. .:v -:, -. �t .. ;C;�,..: >�` �'.. , *L-, yr,:�'+c :A S„ ,•^r ' - ,�;.. ,,+r' �:U'3, :• ., .,_ :.,:st .._ . j.. iC �x =, �f,q,
,. .. _.,.. '-.. .,Y a : ), .� '$ .:, _'. %�.. ,.. .:. '., ...,, ... y.. . r.' .,.-M. yr +3�5• .�. .r� r .,Q '~- .�, ,.0i}.��'�r 3•::�:'F is i€, .h:np. ';Yd'
.,. .: .>�c. ,. ... .,-.: t..„.. ... :.,t,.»A.. ... .. -.... , .... a._..... ,.:r.. :., �;:. rs .'s..'_ `.: r.., �r t`.` �:::-i�aa! ? •a, a .;r.
. > _ r .._ .- , '�. ;m ..... , .:.. ,.,. _ � .�_, __ . �-„ _. ..! �. ., � � � - ;'� -•�, i.,,�> � -fix � �r't>`� :•�t
..'-..:,. ,;k-. .., .. _ ... .:,._�, ..v ,,.,. ,�... .' ,r ... .. '.::r ,...... _-r, r"...n;-. :*•� � -,i-.. s: ''er 8'"6t,• D..: `t�--t.:!'C:re kF,'-��,r: ,,aF.o�iY: fir- :r:l'-r,,...'.
_ .. . ,. _.. }..'%r ... ._ : _ ;�. .-. ...... _., y #.y'# .x. ... ;c e ,... ,, +::. :. � '"•fS - "r �'n..tdc , ,� s ''.i ,�` :. , `tJf ,.
,.:. .,.,,.,..4 ,f... .: .: ,. ::..•�� ,..:. . .:.... .. ..:.-.._ .-,.-:.k t. ,i±:a' S'r t s �`.S".t :rrl x, x. >�.�,r .� ''ke.
�....-,•.... L.,.- �;. .. p ,,:+ Y,.. �s . ,.:n ;- eir._., "`"'S n ,§." .: : t- .., <, iz i"'' a '�: 'i'4'k ,'� r:- h S i
-, .... "_ ._ ...., . - _.. <. :r:-r -:.-.• ,., t.. ,. , a.._ .....•,. ,.. a;.'.:,;? t = �r:- :tip is ."aF,. _ ".�=..' ::Y: "`�.,
,rt .,•Ny`:. .., f,...: ri,...a : «k :v.:: '...,i.0=r. a ... �, 7d a J. .; cJL' r ^f'< a..;�u..
:7a
.
.,^,•N'. -a t ».� F,�:.'r&:'Yf,:
,fti ••!•`K'.=J :r l., t," ,p...a_s' f''.•
.-.. ..... .,.. :.. .. �,,... ,.. �P ,••• ..,:.:.- _ .... '.- ,.:: r..,4...., ;. ,.•-.:... ,s+' - .W .. ,s::.r .-F ,..S .x_ .t4p?r R ,::Z a, „F::' ..r _ 'y.. '?(.. .r.3':. �. ,Q(".n.
• _ .. .:" ' ,. ." ... tR�. ,.. .. +,1..�, ,.+:.� :, - .W :i- ,...x _... ,. .. ..:±. ... .,{ ,-r t .:<.Yr!! 'Y N 8* ya '.t:. ,f ',F�
.!i-',. «y.>. _,.c .,.4^_.7.., .. r'?a ,Yf ,..,-..'i" °j.,,xy,.:, T... .,., ._:'f`w. ,ir- :':a -f "''.. _ - .n :.,4':.: �x 4fa•�'.
,. x .,. ;,....,bit,. >v ';�:§� » t✓✓'r._ k'. a�.x „�w�, : r.?�'.ab'.... ":�. ,.r}. ., _.:'-_ ,'*'�+'. ". Z"r•• �a+"` i:: r ,.4; � =�t a `«''iti: ,+�p� Y' •��.
r-.,.,:.. ,:•.;::4.. _ _,.., :- ,..,. w-. ::, -s> „ ,.. ._�,,. ..:, , �:..... � •'.. .. .. ,rs'. _;Gte'-yf':,.,, ,raf,,.:�..,- � ,},.:,
,.F
r
; .., .-,..',,, _ d• a , ,: , -,. • „.. ,*,,.;.:,.. ,. ,., ., ....:.. k'. ... ,, _ : i b ,., ,,. , .: .. `F', ; ,.,..:� sk, a. : �d . ;?C -.t 4., y.. .. 7n a ,"5...
-. ...,. a- dY : <.:.�«.3 ... ,..,5.-. ... ,. .. - }5•e.. .>."w `r.,,ay.... ,• .. .,, ...5:, ... .. '�, , ,.. .:� Ti *.= a :.,. �d �, t- Y
,,.a_•-�+ .: .. ,.>,.f... � �, .,, e ..,, `'< ,. - _�.�.{ as .. �� r�i�M 'Y;'s�;��Y
,'. -. .. ,,,,•' .. ,n...,,� r.:. ;.. s ;. .,... l,r.ry .l .,f'r.-..,,� ... :�.:: x..;'•,;: ge;C...- :;,.,w 'r'. ,µ. ='r:- � r, ,err `- �:�. � 7�.'-
.;r -. .. ,.. .,.;._ }_. ,, . . q..0 3w.. ..... ,, ... . .. `�-1. ,_� .?�'`<`�. t rte` :< `..s �.,s.,; ^,•:- .£.. - '-� �yr -y.
: w. -; ..,.y ,.. ,.. .. ,...... �.a., x,y .. r. x .... .. `. ,: ;. .: '.�.., -_u: `, si ,1•ri.' iv t.4•a:c.. rC .::F �.'.d .h� ✓.^:�
- A �'.�- a . ,":: .:. '<� , • ��: �`"n ,.? ..,, - , :':. . 2 p2': '4 s %. `'`� ti a-d'ra%,:.f, k .�.. � "'°•L.� .§ of x-91 S a.a�,•
. .,.. Y:s -'.•. " ,., :'::>.� � ..`. .r.•�;:.C'`*'1'! _:'•' :.."x•, :._] "- d �•`�' e' d'„" �'•ai., ,aF ,�', RI ;mow{.: "t .i
`. _,,. ..;�. ,a ..,:-:>- ,. ,., ,' .;.. i � .,, _, ',�. •.;' � f `.� - < rr a.ty; a.,e� moo# .F.-.-a'v�,.,�,i .r
r _ ,,.. -:, � �...... .. -.. _ �:.r, s •..:;.,,..... ,. .. ,.., :. - :,.. r '":: t 4 +mP ,2s, ,-<�w •1,. s�,•,. �"b e %'...T �tC%.'r..r � -'�' i
:; .,...:: .: -.c. ., ,. t.. .-',..r. 1r, .,,?c»�'. 2 ., _...:. rr. .. ,.. .. ..,.. ..: ;'• _ .�, .,{:. '"S � ,"'!' `4, ..t - ,i. a_`�:al.":t.
, ..- : »}:. a:.... . .,.. ;. :.z-.4_a:-.... r_,. ,:.._ .:n, r. -�,c .. P;•...... ,.,. .� - 7,.. J r.,I :-z,:� �,1tta'1;� 3t-�^t"�-. ,E'*•. .rt +� r ..r!'� .i:
,. ,. 7' "- -r.,, .:,.. ,,� :J.i�... '{ ,. .. v, ,: ,,'. :: .1 .✓ :� a$, i+ ',Ct4�w .-�� � .$ s.r. 1:e,�� .A-,�: "*� n
,,�y.F,,..-. . �. ,:., - a. r... -:,.. ♦ .1, �.� � „.,. . I e :i'.. S �. .. : . ,: :i,:, n4
F;i pp A:i,y;.. :C•" 1` 3 5t'.: � ��. ��"1r1�-E -.Y•: ,it 1Yi• .h ��-.3 �.:. 1�. -
-" ' . E^^ :.._, ,.-: ,.. -,.- t � :/ •-!Sn , ..,.. ,1 . ... r y , , . .._ ,. ,: �"'` 'f,4-.' V� :aX• ', p' )k .},.--... _Ci,_ �.,.. � Wi
r:W «:i+C, ,�','•,�',�'u .::p, `,.,c, "t`a•: 'ft', b.nr �x -�.ti;-
,.. .. '- ,::.. �:r. < < _,,a `;..�, .:, .. - '; w'._ ,t I'.. •5.., r"�''� ! �� l- v'�� J41 ��. V: `ia
a,. .. •c .r 7 �',� :p, n�,• � .. a'j?Rf ,w.� 1 :d'• i�,± :.:h y t,y
�- i' ._ .. ... p , ,. ':: .., � : '. - t � � ,,.5 �'5^`y ,.r i�4.'.b �4/ .'�-v"'-'kC+'W` .ti1•"�.
:.: -i •... r: �, , {: . ... ,y.. _.. • ., .. .., � F A kyr A4 .:Gt.. -M :ia'i
.,-,: c•1'•. ,__. :., _ -::.. •J .: ,N ,'.�_ , : :. , ;.':_. - �k{ { _ T - i 4af'.`•5�. y �i f�:• b �-:��i. µ r�R ,}Lx��-
. - ':: '.. +, s� �- ,;. ,., - ., v • , : d: .. �..: , t .nc -aa.f '� r -'4 t n -`♦ ..B a• fx,1 f,,'r r. E '';..}' G-.:� y.u:_:
.... :, r a- . .: -'-.'> .... .• :, v� :'... , .. _, r. f, `'� :;::+.x Z ';i- ;.ir `r;'G :a �;'r+i'� y r? ,i'S-. ,'.r" ,z"4� ::�
s. ' -4: 'a*a+- •'4:-y -.. . '�.:':SI•�Ai .�t�' s'i � :ib.
,..� •.: ;. ,�: t ;'-';,� �' _u ..-. ;i:"' t '� t >~.IA !:.'i•^��.',v� r.` a..-:« r+wr .dam*"::},.,
+{}
X.. � �ched M
a
a,
. ,::. t .< '.-,. ,.. '�.. , .. �,-, .,.. :x a•-... ,.d.z.'- r..�...,..,. , r.: , , .; ,., 2 `.. tir- . >d+•� c 4:;x.r� ■■ , . *a '
�C ba+
Projectr
,.., 1,, ,,. , . ?�•r , E s//:. •,.s�v � . ° z=:. 1 i; y 'x _� �� i'�{ ',. • � 4r: '.
:.�'. '•ST. i-'1, . ^7V _. :.i31(: :.'wY'Ma ,�5 r""•u 'fi'a .Y �.Lt +r'r .. ni. �Y�
.. . �: ,...-c � ���' : y':' ` d „ �'-,. .. 1. -� -; �.:a: N ''s:.,:,:R g 3`n-R :.',) , :c...,�' .J .r.�. 3 ,ri yk �C•' .;.a''.i a •. � •, c .ae'„ t�''d. .N�
.. 3 .:, ,_ .:,, _ ?r 'L;'b3 .r, - . ,:: ., ,',;. :�_ � r �'' .,Y` .4 :c�<� '+�j' a."Y' 3:r •r � : �' rt:w•, . �t'��.°�4"fir.. .t
z. ,.,., � ,.,.. >_ .... .r,,3 x ..... '4. _.--.u.... S. r.. -r. °4- ._ „-..,a.. ...._,.a.. ,. r, ..,:., ,+ ::.,:"7,. /�,A' .5;' 'rt.' ,t�J•.*r . - s ' �. c
: ±. _;,..•, ....,, ., ar:•.. ,.. -..- d-., -,>. ,.. ..'- n•-_• _ ,.,...:....: _:. P ..::a;> ...:,. , ,.:". $:'•" r. �ex •t ;+•�, ;. "! '`'-�S.'. 7b,.:: "� -`'tea "Tt F
:. �. _ t. ... >r.._ .....:.....a. ..,. r. .,..a_ ,-... µ,�. :.. ,_.� ti . i. �-.s,:,• ' kA e'$ •�w, s... Y^ . r.. -, ,'i ., +...;'z'1f. _
-: ,. ;,.-.?, .�1, y_- i.. : a; .. ,,,,",.t..r.,':: �. .f', �+.. s� `1- :g:..=1• fi -. a .�y =a'y, s� c' .k.>^, r- -�,
.... t } L :• -. .L P uv ..'d*;: _ ,i'!}� - AFM '_f :. <` #± "Srt�;'-"l",4" .� ,4h._Cd :y
- "," 'E.. - r �` , • a ,. � v 2 � ;�' �., `ir � ice' .: L 1 ,p ,b'u ," .t . e . "N ,.:" rC`bt_:t::N',.,'a:
k j
�, '• j ni „Ty f��~ _ ' d�. a f bi ! �r,Yj.. ' �ro�,yM1'..
� i 1 3. 4 r{..._ y '�; t. ,,°.-'� ty:: ✓ ;�y3. 5...:.Y,a¢;;
' a A # .�.,�„ it 1..} ' >+•�- •q 2 7>AR 4 :S_a ,t..w wt r - ,u�?.'' .� �c+�
.. 7 z ,' � ..:. � . • ,.. .-c ` .: ; _ -.?' .::, �, �:: r "ari ', «a.- r:'. , rt. +' F+ . F -�h°° tIi„a 3. -.g,- y ','3';..
... :; � .. ,. .; a, z- r._ .1 a. .... i ..3i. „- - a: �„ .,4 •.:.. i„ «..+'.1-K� ik. yrs. �• ::..a ._lr : " r ,a.: `c'�'/�'c•$^ a 'n, �:. 4. ,,,yy
......., r_ . to .. ,._:� ., -„ .. .. ♦ ... A§'. �,: - . .. _. :Y ..: y _ :... �.' - .l✓.• lrl..}; blf �#.•��, � � is • jt���>'k',t N -"�� .
)... ..:.. ,'i.. rt ., t.. r. ".'T.,t��:r� 1.,. x ; 1.'• : :. r. S•"dT.i. 4; "*,. a.. :.. .*:. +i' ..y. .< ; ,ar a. ,. � :':wt' may,.,_ may+-:.5.+'• .�({i; -Y,
- _ , b. ,.•. :.,..,e. i ,e....�(' •i� . ,?C -.7!e_,' ;�r,,; ,_ .. 'i .'�I' .y�,e.-. 't,'� .�,"-.. ..,.+a. _?.T.i;�?. �. �Xd A' .>�{`�8.'!'"..G�, �f': r- ,t'jYej r
,.. ,. .;.., d! .r r . ±V:G Y.:. , .apC`.�, ... a .. .. ,+f.'�' a.�,, i ,{ sr•. �y +, f."T vt,..6:
..:' .. :'.,. ., k:.••thtrr�f,,. ., m ,,.z. ,..° ;, a . d::, -;ew. .r. .... +,� i ,rak,s "� r
�
Y��
,. .s .,t. ..,.. � �• �;�_'.� �" .. t .., `�.•:.x°�' _,: �.,3" .'�: .,, .,,._w,� ...,�`?r;.?_k,�i,-✓ r''�}._,,,.,,�e. .�Z. _ _r'',.a- s. .{, .x'.: 2 .r -;• a-,. rv.. 9.
_.."�' ,aa. �+'�, ..�. �C;:�r._=-= .. .i _«___�aac,r,:..:rye.3�'.`=,.�•,�>.etr�� ��.;,... •�m..a ,_�°�� „`� " ". s ,.>,_. ,. .,, :%,-:+.'�-�+�.,�: _
.... ...• ,. --:, - ,maw •" i
PROJECT SCHEDULE
The scope of work tasks are developed on the Exhibit "Project Tasks and
Schedule" in the sequence in which they must be accomplished in order to develop
the project allowing for acquisition of Federal Lands at the MCAS, Tustin and
the obtaining of Construction and Maintenance agreement with The AT&SF
Railroad.
The project tasks have been divided into three phases for definition of time
elements. Phase I is the Environmental Tasks; Phase II, the Design Tasks; and
Phase III, Construction.
In developing the scheduling, the initial Phase I, Environmental Documentation
is expected to require 18 to 22 weeks, much of this being mandatory processing
time. Every effort will be made to minimize our development and review time in
order to minimize the overall schedule.
Preliminary plans will be developed to clearly define the project for
environmental review and to define the project costs.
To minimize its impact on the overall project schedule, we will request early
authorization to proceed on certain elements of the Design and Right -of -Way
Assistance. These elements are primarily survey, geotechnical, utility and
railroad coordinations. Completion of the design survey and geotechnical
investigation will allow for an early start on bridge, superstructure and
substructure, and substructure design when authorized to proceed. An early
start of the right-of-way work will provide the City's appraisers and MCAS
Tustin and E1 Toro personnel with the information and assistance needed for an
early completion of the property acquisition at MCAS Tustin.
Upon notice to proceed with the Phase II Design Work, work will commence with
the gathering and verification of data. At this time, communications will have
already been established with the utilities, Public Utility Commission and The
AT&SF Rai 1 roan. Criteria will be obtained for use in the design of the
relocation of the City operated public utilities and as plans are developed,
information will be provided to the privately operated utilities for their
design use. The utility relocation designs and the agreement process with the
P.U.C. and the railroad are critical elements to the overall project schedule.
Coordination and design effort will be devoted to ensure their timely
completion. It may be desirable to start the utility relocations prior to
bidding the bridge and surface improvement portion of the project. In the early
stages of the Design Phase, a tentative construction schedule will be developed
with input from the railroad and utilities. Should it appear advantageous, we
would propose preparation of separate project plans and specifications for the
agency utilities. This may facilitate the construction and provide for an
earlier project completion. .
The critical time elements for Design Phase II is the execution of the
Construction/Maintenance Agreement with The AT&SF Railroad. Because of the
centralization of the organization, the agreement and play approval process is
partially accomplished in Topeka, Kansas and New Mexico, which can require up to
12 months. As noted on the exhibit, we would propose to start this process as
early as possible in Phase I.
The Right -of -Way tasks will be developed concurrently with the design tasks of
Phase II. The processing of -Right -of -Way cannot begin until the environmental
process is completed. We will, however, develop the backgrounding in the latter
part of Phase I. This effort of some 42 weeks for Phase II could be the
controlling factor in establishing the advertising bid dates.
A three-month "Float" period is incorporated in the overall schedule to allow
for Right -of -Way acquisition and execution of the railroad agreement.
Based on our experience with other similar projects where railroad and utility
operation are incorporated in the construction, the Phase III Construction
Process is expected to require some 12 months. To minimize the construction
schedule, as previously noted, we would propose to examine the possibility of
:•elocating as many of the utilities as possible, prior to bidding the
construction contract.
In summary, the Environmental and Design, Phases'I and II, can be completed by
May 1991. Construction could begin by August 1990 and be completed in 1992.
"e I "I LOLM
ESTIMATED FEE
l The estimated fees are presented by Scope of Work tasks as requested in the RFP
and as divided into the three phases. There are certain assumptions and
conditions that have been required in order to determine a cost for each one the
tasks as well as when the phases of the project are scheduled. The basic
assumption for each of the phases in developing these estimated fees are
presented below:
Phase I - Environmental Documentation
The preparation of the environmental documents follows the scope of services
presented in the RFP. The environmental studies required are based on those
noted in the Scope of Work and in the Design Report document as prepared by The
Keith Companies. The fees developed assume that the preparation will be !one in
a timely manner and within a 22 week maximum time schedule. It is based on a
notice of determination and findings of no significant impact following the
NEPA requirements. This again is as noted in the Scope of Work.
The fee i s presented i n a format as presented i n the Scope of Work and the
Project Tasks and Schedule. We would propose to begin the survey requirements,
some of the right-of-way documentation, the railroad agreement and the
geotechnical services in Phase I. The cost of these services that could be
performed on an early start basis are presented in Phase I I . This is to allow
the City of Tustin the opportunity to compare efforts and costs on a task by
task basis.
It is anticipated that the environmental assessment will result in a finding of
no significant impact (FONS I) and the basic tasks in Phase I are:
•
Preliminary plan development is placed in the Phase I tasks in order to
define in adequate detail the project for environmental purposes.
A. Research and Data Gathering
B. Environmental Investigations
C. Preliminary Plan Development
D. Survey
t E. Initiate Right -of -Way and Railroad Agreement
F. Geotechnical
Phase II - Final Design
Design and preparation of a final PS&E are based on the assumption that the
project will be as presented in the Design Report. We would assume that the
utility relocations are as noted on the drawings and that the bridge itself
would follow the basic pattern and the basic concepts presented therein. In
_„f �l J- ,.� ^i_•�'{' at. � h+; - � X,�,�_{{ � li,:'�+T L1 �' 'y .i. .t - - $- "1%�.s•'Y.Y�
c r-
-� - .; ; ��-. .- �� ,_ .- "?•+ x: �Ty{ye+�:a 4. _ .'.::- r.,�r s ��-;'� ,. ': ;� •-•r.r• T w..' �.., � .:;• .r+ =� ?^• {;:f'°t .'xt� # R
j "` ,.:. f. � 1 n T i t '' r+ w.: 5 a '."a.''''�:. _i.' � � :+�:.�: <•c ,�,�aa , s�^; t , �,x' ,.z: '�k �'Yri'�`�. s �'rd+ C�+e a
"'•''sail• '» ..v � .�., t�'��,-"'y1:. x:.. a•fw. :'�+' s.<,. ..rrs, r�'.-. F ;'p. � { t''.
• -y�^�.�. ..,� r ,..• l�r° c.^+•. ';,�.'�;�= � ..y. ,.;,. :r:. �-' ix?^' •c >t!+ •.r~p: tf•>, k �.�: g.'.''+,r .�'..
...r5: '.�' .-;���Tn� .: , �' ' ...#] .~ ss•"_ �iaiv�x��y��=' M ms's 4tE'A.�C3A-57T,�,'n.3. 'a''•c zos� 4; ?0k� :-.. `rt e1�:.., � 1...:_a.,�
S to ••- 7v :: -.� :...-.. `� 9r '•..-'cat•' 9Gt+0.•:_ - 3t�.a - - .a>fR., Y'.. - .,`�M'+'4�-s '.`"!/4!a'r�.^.a.•s,s^ _ _ _ _ .
�, �.->v_..--' ,,::..a. rte..'...,, -- � .r. . _ x Ti:.wt<cv.+r,:.-. , r..*u. . r _ .s'a•- �
"y... '� �':"'�� .�,'� - ,: �$T,a,.-_ s�y � <�� �{ _�..� Rpt+�� �e���"`� •1� .�C+EY-��'>IF-
v
y .� � +Jl� � � �,'ib�• �'wX� � ,,.d, �•Fh ei � ti ':�i � Ate s-d.M 7y
�i.rtca^. .�'. R -. •� �'n }- n' is 'i fi '-Yk"r�• ��E �.:4 - o,: {-',.a
t�• _ X
} y9 r
' F�b7 �•. � r7�, •j` ty. •: :- r - 5:..a f: 4i li., n.:.t,'.
yt Ma'•tgv4%�`=_. �"'�- r" ae-y a."i"y,�t' r,�':; W7t4 'h.-.:
"tea � r k - �_t. •�'4t "E� K""�r"R:- "rx}vRgr�, kr `r+� -.�k�" 4a.
- � � uU?-� '41,. ,t,*YGm �'� of �1'�"! y'C sr•. +F�..y�b �" �„' S �4,t� - +"``
r
Y
t r •
� +r"�a r °5"�n 4r �' .;ae !,:: x�•�� sr5.:, ...
c,ar .� u.: � 'L"nr ,� . a•'EL y_ c"i..Y•xfrYS �� s C� . rx _ w,:f -'��^ y�•,t ,',.� " .s. +C r _ i... a��, ' f �� �.s:'
I
'.'i •pa':�v *" ` .L" .Y* u�,s,. . ;F�'fvw . i4. nv?. �,+ ns .�.,
_.r, ,y :,dr - �+- < ti .. �` .iRu ,,,.- .4•ix. uR � yf 4y .•+'�,r,d ;r� �;�'-?i
Y F
:a e� •A:` k ^'7. � -�^• _. r r'��. ''i���^''� '• a }�`Sv, -• 's. �[F y. � ,�. <.. 4"'�,� •j,.��..e. :�i•.:.....� L� i�....
' _.. .. Y+�.:':. ,,.. �: .0 ao-( � ." rt�. ,:.�� � v�"��. •, ..,a+i%a-.. R_ _ n'�r+'{���' -a.' . P�•.ie'.�:': � ,.,iai� �, M3� t. w1e
:>,. _ ..N. ,T f: �h•3'.���iC,:: - s � .�. � � `T �9 - ,r�e}4�i.a-•= '# . X" ��1.
- 1. �„ �"�. ,a. .. d •i.`�,g 'r.a: Ah�yr_ >..t"-�;s;z-�•:�:•,,,. •5 :,..y.; ..y i.•:::. M:.�; : wa ' 7","',r.. :u'� 9`
.•� 'Fa .r9.w :. `.:::. -..5, ... .+� ..;.ham "; ... .A".r. i,..`�h.y:h:.` ,.v <^ .s'•,.' .�. sr.. �3. ..r «3'" �"P ,y"'�3E.M!'+� t:'3:•': may.
a ,,. ".. �.., S :x`�T,f'a5, �� r;s+r:. 3-�R•..r.•-, ,',-•w.t.. S _ ,. 'A,y n: �- -•x+ - -3� 3,x�`r''�.c-• aZ7_ 'M+-r....'i �•c :�--
. wb�,.,,.,."`", r. ... �. F',.,.i il;..+,- { ....-_• ,..��� T,.,;*. .. '„ x� 'w',,t4a; - [ a,a•ta a+'�.li
" .+ •': i. 'T'%" �, ..": •'.. �. .. �:• ... ,, w ,,f,. .. x'_15. -r.,;.. �. ,.y,Y j. .4T iY;. :� �" v,.
.. 'v-•• _ .I.•. -w ._ ,.:. :-"°k..y. ,�_�•,��r :z,i, ...-�1. ti+S.wiy c'R. .�}. s5r•," :.P:- .. F�_ t~ , ~.f„
'... ... �-_....,a �j._�.-.:-L .,. T.•.:� :,.: ... .. .: i; ',,,., ,: +✓.:- 1.. �:.• •.w :.,?.`s':. 't.,:x:�, -.:: .&,, •35•. �w:: :ei� ,; <. r::� . r^ :k g ..tY,,
, ...,,.�_..�s�... -r.., .Cvi-.zrn......,.zaR�.'� 3 r...s.--..te�.�a..,,...,- «y..a:.. � ;- �:� .. „.+•::.>s'T.�,�+'' k... ^,i,
- .. -. _ ,. <..,�, ..-,.. n. :. � 3T t;. .�-t s. •...+' ..�;rr - .,�.:.. .-.. � . ,;�; ';: �.'. - � A '"�• i'r` is ; �...` � to '+ , «Y't,.
-... - .., -. ,.. .... ... ..�_.. ,.-'x :.. 3:j`- ...: .: T. `1,q �... ,...p4��{, q ."i;": .:rwk A.•. �. T.Z f"'C.+ jN'. -'}t �,�'- {"�,.. ::
,.., i ,r, .,.... w:......-. �t.. ee„� -:•« n ..-., ._. _: '-F a.?-,,. _. fix::. ....«.. A..%vs� x.. z..Y. � 1y' ,p'� ,!- •.4.. �l +�e,r..., ?'c :+fit C !.'i'.:._f ,�:
.r .. .+,..,..:».t,6a.•-„r� fe�.'�. _ _f ..'3"�",... _ . Y. <y. C :r �- '� . ..... � ._. ,. _ _,S , .a� _ , .£ �,~ , - a..•,t,. � . },-•�� 1FS;. � r'ii �'"'� � fr x.
... y-rr. 4... h - ,.w+4 wr. •r. :a,.- -: ' ... @� ... .. :. ,. ;..-_ .' ..r,� R `. -:i. "5.,*; ..: ^?C a+Y •`�'•. � a �.r:: �i�.•5.� -4 •fn
.. .. ;. p. 5 ... .w;y . � -, '�. , n'^i' .,. F7i.., ..:wf+.,: _. i1... ..,1. .e;•_i.' , '1{ .dY' .' R �.2, vh +3v �'! •�- Y J".'� +SJ+{ 'M� p-/+'� Tk-,
. ...:. w,. .f:. .+. ... ...'.•..- ..'.. .-..w.alF r.•_.-_.. �cv"d :,'� ::3"._.:.. %'" ..;.� +Sf>.faw ="��. .... • �. ,'F+r. �.R_., ., ,.P�}�n ,w � "�l'ab .'�.,qt. .,::c:,s,
•:.��: ..;4' "`F' ,., . L•. ,. Y: .� .;z.. �.. �;.. ':.-c... .. � .. C+ -°.�` .�,. .,.` .� :•�7:°. � 4; -ri �:!•.' ave" .un:v,����t`a' �eT�s".•
Sy�^:�'t v- xx�_ , r, ,''x..r...: "�.. ... .,..:. i�,•. �. ..*.;�1`
:.......,r ,a•.t". '-•+F„!'.. ,aa.... a� '-':'�9a 4• x x:rs,.:,�-^';,i' .'':.:
,. _ � .: ae-. r. ,.. k„ - •5r.w.,+ Fes, R. ?s. ., ,...... v :,,. ...aarr....:., _,
r..'• S�i't ss 5�.•a•, :......, ._✓- w <. ate::, •� r - .. .: :,. y.•y" n]wv n w+ y +.• 3, .�yY d Y # - ,,y, :., i. :3"C •.?+:fv. 'fit! sC'... ,Y 'C e: - J'• ...',1:ey�
..<-.i, .. [' %?: -t.. f. ..-�"9.•'e _+%i .... '.'Y•`,.. -:.''i'" Lj. .,-.w y.,, I.'. :f. :x "1.. :._ <,-:`-'`•a^'.rf. '1 f '�'.•.'i •l ...£-'J1 Sy..=F yY ..:.."
..C�..• �'
.' 1a�
.?�3' ... «+r`t�"'� ;"i.. �'.,7'z �'�n ,:�'. '� ."9i. •, ,,.y�" e,. Y ;,x r. .� 'cic,•. .- ya,�'' _ •� -
_ .' .:•1 O- r i,.,;. kY, ln;,,�� }ssu ..3 /..-4`::,., ..a •`i Js .•a `ii v`A' .".':...'y'i'
+�}..s ..16•y.,.
: ',-.....-�:1:l ,. �r4�.+u�s.R: �+r`.«<.'�4-!1.:•Mi'.''t`=f4S.. `k��...>M1f.-a.Ya12.
¢ a. fir._ r_: =x• ,-=e 3M.xa'�%
�';; _, •:. ...... :. .-.: -• -w "�' �r ,. �. . .!_... .:..:�_ e .:. .. .. Tr. ... �. :ia - a•.
,�. ,..�, ._,. .W. --c,c. . , :,•�'..'�,,..,,..... � .... � ,-... ..s.. � -. . Nti � �` r,,
:.,. :....'ta?, .,toh s1" a.; �,. �a ^C�-:. ,iEdv •ate s _ Yr � :>,,.. s a �,,'x,.,R s� '�" r +� �, .t.. K y� � $ ? .,^r �`�:s:.. •. :1, Y' '"_i'-_: •'••.-T t.s,_
.. ..r...+ ..e .i.r::x�'°. *Y •.,':30. ..,...J. ....... P::: „�rh:.:A4w, .9• :.L: f. } rv'k'. = If ..✓'
-+,. 3`.4 '7h' s.sn" - :.a. ..w.:,.ac:.� .-f:>.x:,..::`.,..w: •%;,..,, 5^ $
- } .'�...s,:..;
-:' ;{ y..:.. '{... s. , :b:.a`w.+.s }... •-i;t,..,. -_ ,.s�� r.. _.. �?.,.. ;}.� �:�ra k ��.`-V• :v �_,xs- ..#r.r: v. k's." .,'K'., ,q
.�,. •.. <; . . $•n.. �.a,��3>5.. i�w:'1•: a^.�--..'+.ts. ,,,. .:' F $+.<%._ `.. .. _ ._, «T",-�:s -I r.._�:� :4 �«+" .s'•. .ter+•.. ;r, -�
5'.-,:.$, - t,_ e , 7R:. �.,-, r a ,_:,.r.�+•• g+.- `h s„><.y T i '��• ,.i` ,fj.4, .A � t �� c{� h^'}' " •', --t_
,•.:. �'.`lti,t.�, ;�L' `.. <*-'?t'r' _; Hn�,.•,>�.. � ,... <. ,.r <i"T S;N._ �r�r' •%wktk 1Y'_.t^.. �s* } Via,. t... kms. ;`' n' .sl'. '7` `fw .e,r ..[8:...
_._,,.... ..Y ... .:.: .,.�s ..w . .5-.. �.-.. . .. �.•.,. ,,, ...: .,.. »'.'.. .y., :la. y :..<,,. ,! y Y+i: .'2c:s re}'i �Y
- ; .xu � ... r ,.,rte• � +�.,, ... } �' r . Yp, ... ia'•'-. .; .�r]' .fit•.. .,.. r S.c. � + �., _ .. 1. L i � +1r: 'R, K k 4;� �•'�'� T
.! - ;,'...... .v ._. :.eu e.t^...... .. { w .. -:. b!' -,' �_. ... }",�:. ... ����� 3� 1: .ar..' 3%. :+� '.y`y.' ✓3. ,p 4 .y
- .,. >•a, .�, K�.>, . 3. .,:.,, •.P A.. r: .fi 3- _�... .i .' .::.� , v rp .h:.#'i "� c �'{� `x s �' �-iy._ „-�- - �M r.••c., :'.' ,?R3.
1 ._ .. ..,_ . ,'t ...! , .- .§ ...,: � _. �� ..:.. ., '�' �{1T .t, s. • ,�i:7'. y_k x,£er �. - .s4 t",; :r•`' ,;.�, t , . r u*i�"�� ..s ai:sA.or L
.z 5.ti .-.. !0.a �- .>� v.. ., .;,W ... ;._..:_� .,. . .,-a ._\:. �.. ._ ':r„ ... mer ..a•-�t .�a ',d' a ,.:?r•,:: -:s _�x, - �' viii,.
;. ,.. _.,.--•,d+: .l':', T�r�x. . .z�• _��, ..`t�:: .<� . z. ,..�. .s .;,+c ,..,.1 !tr.. � �,-: �,., i'- ,..,,�-"mac is:` - •�. {�.
' ;.,:. �,..:.. , .._ : r.., ,t ... •� ,a:k .. 31�'�' :'YS,.:_:.; 5;� ,.<.. . ' ,.,�.-'.-. ,,. :g.,;., ".�. •}�,� ..... .fir x r,+ r � .. �' ,..r� n. r. .ry . 1 n Ai.'::,� � .<.
r �. �-.2_.,e., . _. _s:< �a_- :.y. ..._ r::.,z,-.....• ..�,�.,�. .,. ..L:, w.:v '-- ,.. :...,: +w, •-?5-.r�'..i'k•.: ,.ri"?k. *rk,_ kr :'c '3v' ••Y x l�y.R
., r. .., . .4'e„... •;<. + .. , .• .z, ,. c._.f`'^,. � ✓e. ; • �r -.a,- � s,Fh.� .-..•F�-a:,, 9 .rr ;.•s . }f'.: ''r, ; +._'k. F "� " +l "N
'.. ... ,a ..\ :•:,if ..C1 F spy�,,r.. •>t:.?-:. �• '•;,�.. :'. -... ,., :r^� j'-?'. y - .. ...: •�:.:..• �4' .:3i� � � 0. iF" :�'•S T
.:-..,i. ... -.. ,: ••m_. -c7• �..;.F'(, +�},�. tR`.!�.w .. ,. «... v,-,. a...__.. ,Y.- H '...", 't."r�•, .,. >� s,"r�'. Y �.. t. "F'i� •. .e•'. ..-,.'� �'S {-;t'•y, ::t. ,r. ��''A". �'k"t:,
' .+.. s-'�':� ,:,, . ,. �u•.. ... cw✓�,, ��`f � . -. :<4 ,,.:,, � ,;.' . .':n. -, _ a �,,. ,, , .. e't. ,. ^e,�c.., : �iC •.j _ .'"Y.-. .t "r�": .: .� E ri,:;�_. .P.,
� •...:�.._',�..-_, �fw,:n_',di•1,�•..:Na?�rt8t,�'&:%�•�'. �4..ci,:_d,.��,twit..�a.aT?L....�.,+v.-s.•Y:�.:.w�=szi�.,..-.t.-._: a.....,.:'kM��1t _ _._ .:�-. ,1_ c,. w. -�..�'>�. d,:o >:.z,pw,:.�. s_.,+:.. s,... ::X:;0.$d1'_T. .1,': wi_ M.a-�":;-•r',r,. ......�f as .. .,,.s ,a+:;au='1:Pr:i':-�
W'� r ETy �•t ix' t,r,a''sxil4� •r'n v +'"' i} .
��+"� � �#�� ter•' •. 1 >y ,t ,'y �
Schedule 5r(ExhIb1t
_,Y
rt.r`^;•. , - , �"" , +�' �"r:a. ra, ._-.. v'_h''ss�A�" , .. -".,. • ';�• r H.�#,:t� J4a7' 2`+y,, > „x. ;n":.i N; A_' Y ,�v- ..,1.s.' � r v 5 ? ,� ,,,,,i:. t. i:_
>+rw' *� '�r��� j��'� � 'sti"� } a"a'� � "rq�'Y�`s �` p , x• z r .. f ,� .� f � '�� z,; i,"q ° ".�; "' y _ , „"i
d'. Eq ,., "�-, ,� �. � : '' �J^ 1 :a{• v'.. 1n '+1 ... :;' sa(.:,,, •P :` l R R 9 I
:9 S.'1'4,+' �,;:c z,.sr ''�..:Y.B.. <-•iec� 'a"..'t ,:7�'•.. •i r �,.;`'E x.�'�.tr• t ."c3..{'^' :.�' ✓ *� ,T i, p 3+ r+riC �@(}-�'._.:
r
�r2b%�i�' s ^*•',.o t!�•,� as a '' fi'� 9. ,v` , r ��'7 e'E;,„ c.+ e � �-yx,.r,.ret� } ro r �„ i,.,.
,•.. .,y,...,. .�_ S"`"°: _�. s>, '��-•i•,..-c....+e' ';"-'$. c$ .�'�'�'�`",i';+. .,., :fes a,f:` .. •'t a<c
n .. ! rYm•, ,. Y.. � sF« « -�GS _k .. _ ,.L` _ ��an ,.: , w. __ ,y:�MR .+•.• _ 5:.-. .. ,
r
additiong it would be assumed that the existing flood control chaannel ate would
essentially follow the present alignment as noted and would nodev
significantly from this alignment or require any modification.
The work on the adjacent land is assumed to be involving only minor grading and
landscaping.
eloping i n the geotechnical tasks, it is realized that in drilling operation n the i on
In dev p 9
ermi is and permit costs could be required. These costs are included
estimated fee.
photography is required
It has been assumed in developing the survey that aerial
and cross-sections are required as noted in the RFP
Right-of-Way assistance is based on the project as developed in tielDesiign
Rig Y
Report and it is assumed that the right-of-way parcels are elsert coordinate with
presented in the report. In addition, as
we have ht of -way issues and include
the MCAS, Public Works in order to he Cite Team.
attendance at meetings as part oft Y
It has been assumed that the title search and litigation fees would
oul dbe for the
I aid for by the right-of-wayagent
reimbursed on a cost basis or fully p
City of Tustin.
It has been assumed that there would be no right-of-way issues involved hi n the
right-of-way parcels that could not be taken care of by d e ti tl eCi ty of Tustin.
or are
part of government lands. Title search will be forward Y
A traf f
i c control task has been added to the Scope of Work to al l ow for nclude
the
bride construction over the railroad and Edinger Avenues. and is intersection
fal sework requirements, column construction in the median a
modi f cati ons.
The bridge dg
esi n is based on a standard type structure utilizing either precast
girders or cast -in-place concrete construction.
For purposes of developing the estimated fee, it has been assumed that 1500 LF
1F f screen walls will be required for contract plan preparation
ti on aneated on
nd
° will be standard masonry walls geotechnical tasks. The saRE�nrwA�G
the �� plans.
� roa mmf_
it is
assumed that al 1 utilities will be relocated by others. Coordination fe ion- an
joint agreement efforts to achieve these relocations are part o the
estimate.
Phase III - Construction Services
The preparation of the fee for this portion of the work is difficult in theadt. t we
time of construction in the project can vary from the scheduleservices as essentially as
have prepared the fee for furnishing the construction assumed that the project will
outlined in the Scope of Work in thethePDesi gn Report and, i n addition, the
take the essential form as noted in
r
construction schedule has been assumed to be about 13 months, and that the
utility relocation would be done concurrently or prior to this 13 -month period.
The basic construction services are outlined as follows:
1. Geotechnical
(. a. Observation ofi 1 e driving n piles)
P 9(or CIDH P es
)
b. Observation of subgrade and embankment placement
I
C. Compaction testing of backfill, structures and subbase
d. Verification of pavement designs
2. Survey
a. Rough grade stakes
b. Fine grade stakes
l
C. Bridge construction staking
I d. Storm drain staking
e. Utility, fencing, signals, lighting and fence staking
f. Provide standard monumentation
( 3. Prebid and Preconstruction Meeting
I.
Attend prebid and preconstruction meetings
4. Prepare and review clarifications of PS&E
5. Review Shop Drawings
a. Reinforcing steel
b. Material conformance
1.
C. Fal sework plans
6. Prepare and review change orders (as required)
I 7. Final Inspection
t
It is to be noted that construction services are not completely definable at
this point in the project. The fee estimates are only an order of magnitude
estimate and furnished as an estimate of expected costs based on 1990-1991
dollars. The construction service fees will be negotiated at the time the
project is advertised - bidding purposes. The fees as proposed reflect costs
based in completing of Phases I and II by September 1991.
l_
EXHIBIT "C"
ENGINEERING EFFORT
TUSTIN RANCH ROAD
DATE: April 20, 1990
SCOPE OF WORK
DESIGN
FEE
CONSTRUCTION*
TOTAL
NO.
DESCRIPTION
PHASE I
PHASE II
PHASE III PHASE I & II
1.
Survey
a. Topographic Survey
b. Cross Sections
189420
189420
2.
Environmental Tasks
a. Preliminary Plans
229373
b. N.E.P.A. Requirements
369050
589423
3.
Street Improvements
a. Street Work, Tustin Road
509000
b. Street Work, Edinger
109000
c. Street Lighting
79500
d. 5cx&a v w.44t 5
169000
83,500
4.
Storm Drain Plans
a. Hydrology
29700
b. Storm Drain Plans
149000
169700
5.
Bridge Structure
_
a. Bridge Type Selection
89000
b. Bridge Plans
769897
849897
6.
Traffic Signing and Striping
a. Tustin Ranch Road
99000
b. Edinger Avenue
29000
c. Walnut Avenue
29000
139000
6A.
Construction Traffic Control
a. Bridge Construction
49000
b. Ramp Construction
2,000K'
69000
7.
Landscaping and Irrigation
49500
129500
(7,500)
179000
8.
Traffic Signal Plans
a. Walnut
49500
b. Edinger
49500
9,000
9.
MCAS, RR, Utility Coord.
39600
Mwgwww�-
10.
Right -of -Way
a. Requirements
39501
b. Definitions
29000
c. Legal Descriptions
39000
89501
11.
Geotechnical
a. Determine Foundations, etc.
99000
b. Recommendations Foundations
49300
c. Geotechnical Report & Log of Boring
89000
219300
d. Subgrade.Preparation
• Phase I I I construction service fee would be negotiated at a later date. The proposed fee is
an estimate of expected fees based on 1990-1991 dollars.
SCOPE OF WORK
DESIGN FEE CONSTRUCTION*
TOTAL
NO.
DESCRIPTION
PHASE I PHASE II
PHASE I I I
PHASE I& II
e. Pile Driving Observation
f. Compaction Testing
g. Coordination
22,000)
12.
Construction Survey
a. Rough Grade
b. "Blue Top"
c. Bridge Construction
(58,000)
d. Storm Drains
e. Utility Staking
f. Standard Monumentation
13.
Contract Documents
a. Assemble Plans
19000
b. Specifications
19,000
exr-
209000
14.
Cost Estimate
a.Preliminaryco-
b. Final
9.000
139000
15.
Construction Services
a. Prebid/Preconstruction
(49000)
b. Shop Drawings
(189051)
c. Final Inspection
(49000)
TOTAL PHASES
1189243
2641) 4/98
'PPt-
t 13, 551)
38�,7�J
TOTAL
7.
• Phase I I I construction service fee would be negotiated at a later date. The proposed fee is
an estimate of expected fees based on 1990-1991 dollars.
W7 46
�1, , =V.W"
Y %
n.
�AR
•
2y
Hour
ly Rate Sheet (Exhibit'
D)
-0 XQ
V,
W7 46
�1, , =V.W"
Y %
n.
•
Hour
ly Rate Sheet (Exhibit'
D)
-0 XQ
V,
W7 46
�1, , =V.W"
M
N
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
RATE SCHEDULE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Effective June 1989 Until Revised
CLASSIFICATION
ENGINEERING
Project Manager
Project Engineers/Senior Engineer
Coastal Scientist
Mechanical Engineer
Electrical Engineer
Structural Engineer
Coastal/Harbor Engineer
Civil Engineer
Staff Engineer
ARCHITECTS/SPECIFICATIONS
Architects
Specifications
DRAFTING
CLERICAL
SPECIAL
Drafter II
Drafter I
Word Processing
General Clerical
Principals
Court Appearances
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Computer Rates
Micro Computer at $15/hour
CADD at $15/hour
Main Frame at Cost + 25%
Reproductions
Subcontractors
In -House Prints and Xerox at Cost
Other Reproduction at Cost Plus 15%
HOURLY RATES
$102.00
$ 86.00
$ 86.00
$ 82.00
$ 80.00
$ 70.00
$ 66.00
$ 68.00
$ 49.00
$52.00
$40.00
$40.00
$34.00
$120.00
$200.00
Cost + 15% Unless Otherwise Provided in Written Agreement
Mileage
Company Auto at 25 cents/mile
Travel
Travel and Expenses at Cost
moon
ENNE
Michael Brandman Associates Environmental Research ■ Planning and Processing ■ Resources Management
SCHEDULE OF FEES
Effective January 1, 1990
MBA provides consulting services in environmental compliance, planning and processing, and
resources management. Compensation is based on the following schedule of fees and charges.
Director $ 80 - 120
Senior Project Manager 75 - 100
Project Manager 60 - 80
Environmental/Planning/Resources Specialist 50 - 70
Environmental/Planning/Resources Analyst 40 - 60
Graphics Designer 40 - 75
Word Processing Operator/Technical Editor 40 - 50
Administrative Assistant/Clerical .35 - 50
OTHER LABOR RATES
Principal -in -Charge rates are $130 to $180 per hour. Labor rates for expert testimony, litigation
support, and depositions/court appearances are subject to a 100 percent additional premium.
DIRECT EXPENSES
1. Out-of-pocket expenses (such as, but not limited to, travel, telephone, messenger service,
lodging, meals, blueprint, reproduction, photographic services): Cost, plus 15 percent.
2. Subcontractors: Cost, plus 15 percent.
3. Passenger cars: $0.30 per mile, plus 15 percent.
4. Four-wheel drive vehicles: $75.00 per day plus $0.70 per mile, plus 15 percent.
5. Photocopy: $0.25 per page (8'/_" x 11" or 8Y2" x 14") or $0.35 per page (oversize), plus 15
percent.
6. Facsimile: $2.00 per page, plus 15 percent.
Unless otherwise specified by contract, the following provisions will apply: Invoices are issued
monthly and are payable upon receipt. A finance charge of 1.5 percent per month is assessed for
any amounts not paid within 30 days. Payment thereafter is applied first to accrued interest and
then to the unpaid principal balance. Late charges will not exceed the maximum rate allowable
by law. Any attorney's fees or other costs incurred in collecting any delinquent amount shall be
paid by the client.
606 S. Olive Street, Suite 600, Los Angeles, CA 90014 (213) 622-4443 Fax: (213) 895-0959
Santa Ana - Los Angeles - San Diego - Honolulu
FEE SCHEDULE
JANUARY 1, 1990 - JANUARY 1, 1991
The following are hourly fee rates for services performed by Denne' Design Group.
PRINCIPAL $75.00
PROJECT MANAGER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT $65.00
TECHNICIAN/DRAFTSPERSON $50.00
CLERICAL/DELIVERY $22.00
Prints, research materials a --.id other incidental supplies are billed,at cost plus
ten percent.
Exhibit D
KIMLEY-HORN SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
Principal
Senior Professional/Project Manager
Registered Professional
Professional 2
Professional 1
Senior Technician
Technician/Drafter 2
Technician/Drafter 1
Support Staff
160.00
110.00
90.00
75.00
60.00
75.00
55.00
45.00
25.00 - 40.00
DMC Engineering
HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
Effective January 1, 1990 thru January 1, 1991
OFFICE PERSONNEL
Principal
Project Manager
Registered Engineer/Licensed Surveyor
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Calculator/Mapper
Senior Draftsperson
Draftsperson
FIELD PERSONNEL
3 Man Survey Crew
2 Man Survey Crew
COMPUTER -& OTHER SERVICE FEES
$ 80.00
$ 65.00
$ 60.00
$ 55.00
$ 45.00
$ 45.00
$ 35.00
$ 30.00
150.00
$ 130.00
Computer Aided Design and Drafting $ 60.00
Computer Time $ 25.00
Specification Typist $ 20.00
NOTE: Blueprinting, reproduction, messenger service an . - d %—r
di rect e%penses will be ch. ar,ad at _St r'_ws 1C° . "i-_ ad?itic. a'
c::aryes for ^:i'_ -age, supplies, or telephone eXpenses will be
included.
01 C
O
N
OD OM1 •-f
0��
M
1 M
1
> 14
W 0
er N
N
64)C
N
� ef'
e!' ••'1
t+
�
'
tr
CD
C
cn
h N
h
h 0 ill
44
h
h
d
•
H
a' a
V' Ln
,-a
co
Il!
M
in
01
en
4
N
N
O
N
Q y0
N
•r •a
co
4#
Vk
h i�} i1!
1A
ill
ire!
a,
41
a�
• to
0% M
N. O
o
p0
•
oVIA
co
N
I
h
O
•�
. .
•
. E
1
rn
M
1 + ,,
ul
OD
01
r-)
r-1
p
r•i
0 q
P-4
r'
0 h
i+f
h h r!
4&
h
h
a
a
•
f7 •'•1
M
N O
•
O
co�
�0 O
00
tO
01
u?
�
�
01 kn
�
�
O
h h N
h
4*
h
14
a
x
a
o
co
°
o
Ln
h
•r4
OO M
M
O
V'
N r••!
'V'
O�
M
4i
ri
N
a
h 0
h
i13
N
400 -
di •
r
O
•
U
Z
K o
88 8
JM
^
' •�
tD •••1
•-1
h
01
d
• .
•
• V
�O
n
�
�
•-i
•I
M •�
�
t0
V O
z a
K 1�1!
h
h 46 0
h
tr!
N
s�
d
N C,
•-1
•P4 b►
rl- Ln
to
.N-1 M •
o
v-4
w
N
L
b b
r•i
r4
u'1
Ln
9r i1
h
w
w
N
Q
•i O
.�
to v
•
to '„�
th
h
N
C4 h1
t*f tD
.-1
M LnLn
W
'ri
•�j
rte{
cp�f
in
Ln
y
y
iii r!
K
4* h M
i'!
1 K
h
�w
b
f� �'
C1
e"1 P
p1
crf
N
� O
O
d�
O
41 1�
•
•
h
�O
%0
h
.W
x a
N
N
h
ilk
>+ W
N N
M
N knp
�p
r%
• P4
N
n
W
w 0
N
N
C �"+
N
co
�
3 �
cq
iA h
H
0 M 0
h
44
iii
.w•
e•1
•
.-.
ao
v
Groro1 t
a W
IV M
M
co
•-1
pp
.-I
M "444
�o
N
Q�
r4
4'
�
�
•�•i 4.1
� b
.--I
.moi
V�
N
N N
H
H il! H
H
M
N
as
-A r1
01
C�
O N
M
tr1
Q1 W
� O •-1
d
m
N
O
N
Go
4) W
44
h h
M
H M H
Ml
H
0
>1 a
ST
a
Q►
r+
ri
N
In
b W
.M4
pq
N
V
.a.
4
04 �'
ilf M
N
h H h
H
h
1+►
4J
o�
-t oa
0% c�
M
v� co
o
N
N
d 8
O N
r-1 0 .
W
O
0o
W
N
•
w
N b
rd iN
h N
0
N
N
rn
o
a
Ul
V'
an.04
h
4*
0
M
vM
m
co
N•
N
M h
N
er'f r-1 •
�p
(�
uN -0
O
r -I
N
•cin
M 0
y
h il! h
h
y
y
u �
o o
an
10
r'► o
N M
•�
N
rc 1�
f4
V
W
'd
as H
N Ilf
r!
h N M!
i1)
h
iA
o�
�E
.S
a �+
a ro
o :n
Ln M
rl
rl
•
r N u
N
O
Q
P
P -i
N
F E
N M
h
u
.
Ud
0)
. .
tMA
•
~ N
�"� .
N
00
C1
O
E4
N
N
N
N
�D M
n
. A
x
'P4
44 h
Ir!
h h V!
44
w
h
H�
V
Ln M
N m
"'�
�O •
CNN
N
o
as
E
N
'4
�
...r
a
M •�
ao
�n
u;
t0
•
E�
N 4
H
44 M V!
V!
h
H
•
M •
r
0-4
W
U.
a
=
Fs
Xr
•
n
.y
N M N N N N h N 1�1
.S
8
u
u
4
h N
M
+1
N
N
N
N N
N
h h h
N
M
h
.S
8
u
h N
M
N N N
N
N
N
Request For Proposal (Exhibit E)
January 16, 1990
Mr. J.H.T. Miles
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers
3151 Airway Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Department of Public Works/Engineering
Re: Request for Proposal - Consultant Services
Tustin Ranch Road Extension Project: Walnut Avenue to Edinger Avenue
(City file #2369.3)
Dear Mr. Miles:
This letter represents a Request for Proposal for consultant services for the
furnishing of final design services, including preparation of design plans and
specifications, and preparation of an environmental document for construction
of the extension of Tustin Ranch Road from Walnut Avenue to Edinger Avenue (see
attached location map). Your firm has been selected as one of those being
considered to provide this service.
Selection of a firm to provide this service will be based on demonstrated
competence, professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory
performance of the services required and familiarity and prior experience with
providing this type of service, including any sub -consulting firms to be used
to provide the necessary services discussed in the scope of work (submit as
Exhibit A). Upon our selection of the most highly qualified firm to provide
the required services we will negotiate the price for the work to be done. If
we can reach a price we deem fair and reasonable, the contract will be awarded.
If we are not able to negotiate a price we deem to be fair and reasonable to
the City of Tustin, we will thank you for your proposal and we will proceed to
the next most highly qualified firm to provide the requested service and will
seek to reach a negotiated price with that company, and so on.
It is required that the following be submitted with your proposal:
1. A brief list of similar types of projects which your firm has
previously performed, including scope, cost and agency for whom
completed and individual in responsible charge of the project.
2. Identification and resumes of individuals and their titles who will
supervise and perform the service; including any sub -consulting firms
to be used to provide the necessary services discussed in the Scope of
Work (submit as Exhibit A).
300 Centennial Way Tustin, California 92680 • (714) 544-8890
-2-
3. Time schedule (submit as Exhibit B) broken down according to the tasks
listed in the Scope of Work (Submit as Exhibit A) for accomplishing the
project though completion of final design from the issuance of a Notice
to Proceed.
4. Fee schedule (submit as Exhibit C) indicating the proposed cost for
completing each task listed in the Scope of Work (submit as Exhibit A).
The proposed cost to complete each task shall include the costs of all
administration and overhead, project site visits, and attendance at
meetings.
5. Schedule of hourly rates (submit as Exhibit. D) for your firm's employee
titles or various classifications.
The Scope of Work (submit as Exhibit A) to be done by the consultant to the
satisfaction of the City shall consist of the following tasks:
1. Perform detailed topographic survey at 1" — 20' with 1 foot contour
intervals for use in preparation of all project plans. Detailed cross
sections are to be prepared at 25' spacing and included as part of the
street improvement plans (horizontal scale: 1" = 10', vertical scale:
1" = 1').
2. Prepare preliminary plans, based upon Alternative I of the Project
Design Report, for environmental review and the Environmental Initial
Study. The work shall also include preparation of a complete
environmental document pursuant to N.E.P.A. requirements for the area
which is southerly of the Orange County Flood Control District (F1O)
Channel right-of-way. It should be noted that the remaining portion of
the project has been covered by a previous environmental document
processed under Tract No. 8763. In addition, the document shall
address issues related to noise, aesthetics, and visual impacts to the
Peppertree Residential Community located to the west of the proposed
road.
The Environmental Tasks required shall also include the development and
conducting of a complete public input program aimed at community and
public agency awareness of the project. The public input program shall
be consistent with N.E. P. A. guidelines and requirements.
3. Prepare complete street improvement plans (ink on mylar, 1" — 20'
scale). The plans shall include but not be limited to construction of
the following: Curb and gutter, sidewalk, paving, street lighting,
concrete block screen walls, as well as modifications to existing
Edinger Avenue.
4. Prepare complete storm drain improvement plans (ink on mylar, 1" = 20'
scale) including all appurtenant facilities/structures. This work
shall also include preparation of a complete hydrology study and
hydraulic calculations inaccordance with the City of Tustin standards
and current Orange County Hydrology Manual and the current hydraulic
standards of the Orange County Flood Control District.
-3-
5. Prepare complete bridge and associated structure plans (ink on mylar,
1" a 20' scale) per the Project Design Report Alternative I concept.
This work shall include all structural engineering necessary for the
design.
6. Prepare complete traffic striping and signing plans (Tustin Ranch Road,
Edinger Avenue, Walnut Avenue) to accommodate the improvements (ink on
mylar, 1" a 20' scale).
7. Prepare complete landscaping and irrigation plans for the improved
rights-of-way (on mylar, 1" - 20' scale).
8. Prepare complete traffic signal plans (ink on mylar, 1" — 20' scale) as
follows:
a. Tustin Ranch Road and intersection of Walnut Avenue modification of
soon to be existing traffic signal.
b. Intersection of Tustin Ranch Road and Edinger Avenue - installation
of a new traffic signal.
c. Special provisions in accordance with City Standards.
d. Project coordination with the traffic sub -consultant, if one is
utilized.
9. Provide full coordination with all utility companies and affected
agencies/parties via certified mail, including any required permit
processing.
10. Provide complete documents for right-of-way acquisition (road, slope,
drainage, right of entry, temporary construction easements, etc.),
including legal descriptions, exhibits, and computations. It should be
noted that if required, or needed, the City of Tustin will contract
separately for appraisal services.
11. Provide geotechnical and soils engineering services for design and
construction including, but not limited to, the following:
a. Determination of shrinkage factors, infiltration/permeability of
existing soils, maximum allowable bearing pressure for foundations,
minimum embedment of footings below finished grade, allowable soil
pressure for walls, expansive characteristics, inplace density and
relative compaction; surface and underground drainage, and
erodibility.
b. Recommendations for structural foundations; compaction of soils and
placement/alteration of necessary earth embankments/fills.
-4-
c. Submission of geotechnical report with a site plan showing boring
locations.
d. Observation by a qualified soils engineer or technician of subgrade
preparation and placement alteration as necessary with
embankments/fills.
e. Observation by a qualified soils engineer or technician of bridge
pile driving operations.
f. Compaction testing of backfill materials for such items as, but not
limited to: storm drains and utility trenches, structures, sub -base
material, verification of pavement design sections based on sub -base
strength and materials.
g. Full coordination with the geotechnical sub -consultant, if one is
utilized.
12. Provide field construction surveying as follows:
a. Provide one set of stakes for rough grading purposes.
(1) Stake centerline alignment and grade of streets on 50'
stations.
(2) Stake curb alignment and grade of streets on 50' stations.
(3) Provide slope staking for all cut/fill slopes.
b. Provide one set of "blue top" stakes for fine grade purposes.
(1) Stake centerline alignment and grade of streets on 25'
stations.
(2) Stake curb alignment and grade of streets on 25' stations.
(3) Provide slope staking for all cut/fill slopes.
c. Provide one set of stakes for bridge construction:
(1)
Stake horizontal
and
vertical
control
for
pile locations.
(2)
Stake horizontal
and
vertical
control
for
abutment
locations.
(3)
Stake horizontal
and
vertical
control
for
bridge structure
alignment.
(4)
Stake horizontal
and
vertical
control
for
miscellaneous
bridge and other
appurtenant
facilities.
d. Provide one set of stakes for construction of storm drains.
(1) Stake alignment and grade for all conduit flowlines,
headwalls, and wing walls.
(2) Stake alignment and grade for all manholes, catch basins,
and junction structures -- two stakes each.
-5-
e. Provide one set of stakes for alignment and grade for the placement
of telephone facilities, power vaults, street lighting, traffic
signal pole(s), chain link security fencing, irrigation main
installations and/or relocations, and other appurtenant item
locations and/or relocations.
f. Provide standard monumentation and appropriate centerline tie
notes at the completion of construction for the following:
(1) Street centerlines.
(2) Property corners.
13. Prepare the bid package, inclusive of general and special provisions,
for bidding and construction in accordance with the standard City
format.
14. Prepare preliminary and final detailed construction cost estimates for
the various bid items.
15. Provide assistance to the City during the construction phase to clarify
the intent of the plans and specifications, review and approval of all
shop drawings, and provide design assistance if changes to the project
are required during this phase.
The City of Tustin will be responsible for the following:
1. Provide all available existing data, information, reports, records and
maps available in City files such as design plans for adjacent and
existing improvements, soil reports, and surveys which may exist.
2. Provide all required copies of plans and specifications for the project
bid documents.
3. Provide a Project Manager/Contract Administrator and Construction
Inspector.
Attached for your use in preparing your proposal is a sample "Certificate of
Insurance" and a "Professional Services Agreement" utilized by the City for
such work. Also attached is a location map for the project, a copy of the
Project Design Report, a copy of the Staff report on this project for the City
Council meeting of October 16, 1989, and the relevant City Council minutes of
October 16, 1989 dealing with this topic. The consultant should also be
advised that if selected, a policy for errors and omissions coverage will be
required.
If your firm is interested in submitting a proposal for this work, it must be
received by 5:00 p.m. Monday February 12, 1990 at the City's Public Works,
Engineering Division. Please note that five (5) copies of your proposal are
required to be submitted.
Should you require any additional information or have any questions, please do
not hesitate to contact me at (714) 544-8890, ext. 288.
Very truly yours,
Dana R. Kasd
Engineering Servi
DRK: j
Attachments
LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
DATE:
• TO:
FROM:
OCTOBER 6, 1989
Jinl •..
WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
SUBJECT: TUSTIN RANCH ROAD EXTENSION BETWEEN WALNUT AVENUE
AND EDINGER AVENUE (File #2369.
RECOMMENDATION: ,
That the Tustin City Council at their meeting of October 16, 1989:
1. Receive and• file fiusti-n Ranch Road Project Design Report.
2. Authorize staff to solicit proposals for final design
services, plan preparation, and preparation of environ-
mental document based on,Alternative I.
3. Authorize commencement of negotiations with the Marine
Corps for approximately 12.3 acres of right-of-way
• acquisition. -
-
BACKGROUND:
In August 1988, the City Council authorized the preparation of a project
design report for the extension of Tustin Ranch Road between Walnut
Avenue and Edinger Avenue, a distance of approximately one-half mile. A
copy of the report is attached for the City Council's information.
This roadway would join the soon to be constructed northerly segment of
Tustin Ranch Road at Walnut Avenue and extend southerly towards Edinger
Avenue. The road would bridge over the Orange County Flood Control
right-of-way, the AT&SF Railway right-of-way and Edinger Avenue, and
would return to Edinger by means of a loop ramp system and a T-type
intersection which would be signalized. Please refer to sheets 2 and 3
of 15 in Appendix E for concept layout of the loop ramps.
The.. loop ramp configuration would encroach into the MCAS facility and
require the acquisition of approximately 12.3 acres of land from MCAS.
The roadway portion north of the Flood Control right-of-way has been
previously dedicated to the City as a condition of approval of Tract Map
No. 8763.
This project also provides for the construction of a new 61- 811 concrete
block screenwall along the westerly side of Tustin Ranch Road extending
along the top of the embankment between the new bridge and Walnut Avenue.
1 !.
TUSTIN RANCH ROAD EXTENSION
OCTOBER 6, 1989
PAGE 2
The study has provided two alternatives for the project. The primary
difference between alternatives is the length of bridge structure
utilized to span the Flood Control facilities. Alternative I utilizes a
longer bridge to.span the Flood Control channel while. Alternative II
utilizes a shorter bridge in combination with a box culvert facility for
the Flood Control channel. Comparative costs for each alternative are as
follows: -
Alternative I Alternative
Irvine Co. obligation $1,030,215 Irvine Co. obligation $1,143,773
City of Tustin 5,340,379, City'of Tustin 51114,921
$6,370,594 $6,258,694
, ..
$6,371,000 16,259,000
The above-mentioned construction costs do not include right-of-waycosts
for approximately 12.3 acres of land to be acquired from MCAS.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council has authorized $150,000 in the 1989-90 Capital
Improvement Budget for the final design and environmental documentation
of the Tustin'Ranch Road extension to Edinger Avenue. Staff is request-
ing authorization for the following:
1. Solicitation of proposals to consultants for final design, plan
preparation.and preparation of an environmental document for the
project based upon Alternative I. The environmental documenta-
tion would cover the area southerly of the Orange County Flood
Control right-of-way only. The remaining portion of the project
has been covered by a previous environmental document processed
under Tract No. 8763.
2. Commence formal negotiations with the Marine Corps staff to
acquire the required 12.3 acres of right-of-way for'the loop '
connection to Edinger Avenue.
It is estimated that the final design, plan preparation and environmental
document will take approximately 12-15 months to complete.
s
TUSTIN RANCH ROAD EXTENSION
OCTOBER 6, 1989
PAGE 3 '
The construction schedule 'for this project will be subject to the
availability of funding for both the City's share of the construction
cost and the full right-of-way costs. Without the passage of Measure M
(1/2 cent sales tax), increase in State gasoline taxes, or the
implementation of other revenue streams, thisproject could take several
years to implement. However, it is extremely important to proceed with
the design phase and have a shelf -ready project in the event an unknown
source of funding becomes available.
01
-- Bob Ledendecker
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
BL: my
CITY COUNCIL MI11UTES
Page 12, 10-16-89
he original motion was amended, maker and second agreeable,
1 elude the 90 -day certification .language as stated in e
su titute motion..
The o nal motion carr ed 4-1, Kennedy opposed.
S. PROJECTE WATER DEBT SERVICE FUND CASH FLOW
-Councilman esterey's motion to approve Option It 1, four-year,
amortization n approximately $100,000 increment died for l cY
of a second.
It was moveded b P cot to approve Option
No. 2, three-year tion divided into tw approximately equal
Payments with delay f the second paym t until the City had
repaid the $300,000 1 ue of TWW Bonds n November, 1990.
The motion carried—S=Q.
S. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF STREET DIC ION, IRVINE BOULEVARD/NEWPORT
AVENUE (CHEVRON USA, INC.)
Bob Ledendecker, Director of u is Works, responding to Mayor
Kennedy's question regard g th timeline for this project,
answered in approximately -5 years a City would need to modify
the -left turn movement the inters tion.
Council/staff discus on followed rega ng acquisition of the
public right-of-way
The following me er of the audience addres d the City Council
regarding the edication and resulting cl ure of subject
.business:
Rober Fiscus, representing Chevron USA, Inc.
Council/ taff%speaker discussion followed regarding iI rovement
of the intersection, acquisition of right-of-way and lvaging
the s ject business.
ji/as moved by Kennedy s b.,conded y Prescott, to pe it st f.roperty owner and Chevron USA, Inc. to meet and attempt o
esolve this matter.
The motion Carrie 5-0.
7. TUSTIN R,1NCH ROAD EXTENSION BETWEEN WALNUT AVENUE AND EDINGER
AVENUE
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, reported Peppertre'e
homeowners raised concerns regarding installation of a wall
extending to join the bridge. He stated this would be reviewed
in the environmental documentation for the project.
Mayor Kennedy questioned what mitigating measures would be taken
and staff responded that a berm similar to that proposed adjacent
to the northerly section of Walnut was planned..
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar cautioned that mitigation 'language and
participation of the homeowners' association be included in the
action.
It wa; moved by Edgar.—seconded by Fre3cott, to approve the
following:
1. Receive and file Tustin Ranch Road Proj,eCt Design Report.
2. Authorize staff to solicit proposals for final design
services, plan preparation, and preparation of environmental
document based on Alternative 1,
3. Authorize commencement of negotiations with the Marine Corps
for approximately 12.3 acres of right-of-way acquisition.
CITY COUNCIL KIFUTES
Page 13, 10-16-89
4. Provide adequate sound mitigation, reduce visual pollution,
and residents to participate in the design Process.
Council/staff discussion followed regarding the Environmental
Impact Report for the project.
The following member of the audience spoke in favor of the
proposed motion: .
Guido Borges, 2132 Dogwood Road, Tustin
The motion carried 4-1, Hoesterey opposed.
SCI REPORTS
1. PLANNING COWIISSION ACTION AGENDA - OCTOBER 9, 1989
It w u; moved by Hoesterey. seconded by Edgar, to rati: the
Planning Ccmmission•Action Agenda of October 9, 1/eive
he motion carried 5-0.
2. CO UNITY CABLEVISION COMPANY RATE INCREASE
It was moved by Hoesterey. seconded by Edgar, to a d file
subjec report.
The ofcarried-2-0.,
3. SEVENTEEN T STREET MEDIAN ISLAND LANDSCAPIN
It was move b e cot , to receive and file
subject report th correction of comple on date noted, Spring
1990. 1P
The rotion - .
4. GAS POWERED LEAF BLOW 3
It was moved d by d , to receive and file
subject report.
The motion carried 5-0.
5. NARCOTICS ACTIVITY - CARFAX R E
It was moved by Hoesterey gggnde by Edgar, to receive and file
subject report:
The notion -ca d -
6. VANDENBERG LANE NAT WELL STATUS REPOR
It was moved by Ho terey. secondedEdaa • to receive and file
subject report.
The mot c 5-0. '
7. STATUS OF LA SCAPING - 233 W. MAIN STREET
It wa mov e d ; to rece a and file
subject port.
The moVon ca - .
8. INVES•tMENT SCHEDULE AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1989
/he
s moved by Hoesterey. seconded by Edgar to receive and f e
ct report.
otion carried 5-0. ,