HomeMy WebLinkAboutOB 2 INTERIM FEE INC 05-07-90A92216 WMEM
ENDA-
G _
I A
OLD"BUSINESS NO. 2
5/7/90
4�► Inter - Com
DATE: APRIL 30, 1990 lj
TO: WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
SUBJECT: INTERIM FEE INCREASE PURSUANT TO MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE
FEE PROGRAM FOR THE FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
RECOMMENDATION:
Pleasure of the City Council.
BACKGROUND:
On December 4, 1989 at 7:00 P.M., the Tustin City Council conducted a
public hearing to consider an increase in the collection of fees (the
"Development Fees") pursuant to the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee
Program for the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor. After the
receipt of testimony, the public hearing was closed and the City Council
considered adoption of Resolution No. 89-185 which established areas of
benefit and approved an interim increase in development fees of the
Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program for the Foothill/Eastern
Transportation Corridor. Resolution No. 89-185 failed to be passed and
adopted as a result of a deadlocked City Council vote of two votes for
and two votes against the adoption of Resolution No. 89-185.
A copy of the minutes pertaining to this issue for the December 41 1989
City Council meeting is attached for information.
The remaining member agency cities and the County of Orange have
approved/adopted this interim fee increase along with the Foothill/
Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency. The new fees became effective
on December 15, 1989.
DISCUSSION:
The attached City of Tustin Resolution No. 90-50 establishes the areas
of benefit and approves an interim increase in development fees of the
Major Thoroughfare and Bridge fee Program for the Foothill/Eastern
Transportation Corridor and is presented for the City Council's
consideration for adoption.
The City Attorney's office has determined that no additional public
hearings would be required to complete action on this item of business.
tYG -e-
Bob Ledendecker
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
BL: my
Attach.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 90-50
THE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
ESTABLISHING THE AREAS OF BENEFIT AND APPROVING AN
INTERIM INCREASE IN DEVELOPMENT FEES OF THE MAJOR
THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE FEE PROGRAM FOR THE
FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously found, pursuant
to Resolution No. 85-103 that the implementation of the
Foothill/ Eastern Transportation Corridor will help to relieve
congestion on existing transportation systems within the City;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 948 of the City, the
City Council adopted its major thoroughfare and bridge fee
program (the "Fee Program") providing for fees (the "Development
Fees") to be paid by building permit applicants in the City; and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary to adopt an interim
increase of the Development Fees in the amounts described in
Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference;
and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing on the proposed
increase of the Development Fee was given pursuant to the
provisions of Ordinance No. 948 and Sections 66484.3 and 65962
of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the property owners of a majority of the area
of benefit described below did not file written protests to the
increase of the Development Fees; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 66001 of the Government
Code of the State of California, it is necessary that the City
make certain findings in connection with the increase of the
Development Fees.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The boundaries of the Area of Benefit shall
be those portions of the real property located in the City of
Tustin which are described in the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge
Fee Program for the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor
(the "Fee Program") attached as Exhibit A to the First Amended
and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, dated as of
October 21, 1988 (the "JPA"). The Fee Program and the JPA are
on file in the City Clerk's office and are incorporated herein
by reference.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Section 2. The estimated cost of these major
thoroughfares and bridges to be constructed pursuant to the Fee
Program and the JPA, excluding financing costs associated with
such construction, is in 1988 dollars as follows:
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor $1,500 Million
The Fee Program is designed to collect 48.48% of the costs of
construction of the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor.
Section 3. The interim increase of the Development Fees
in accordance with the Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A. is
hereby approved and ordered. It is hereby acknowledged that
this interim increase will be reviewed by the City in calendar
year 1990 to determine, among other things, an appropriate share
of financing costs to be attributed to new development and to
confirm the adequacy of the Fee Program.
Section 4. The Development Fees for development within
the Area of Benefit are based on the trip ends generated by the
development as determined from the trip generation tables
included in the Fee Program, and shall be assessed upon new
development based upon the number of dwelling units included in
the development (for residential projects) or the gross square
footage of the development (for non-residential projects).
Section 5. The purpose of the increase of the Develop-
ment Fees is to reflect certain cost increases in connection
with the construction of bridges over waterways, railways,
freeways and canyons, and construction of major thoroughfares in
Orange County, as more fully described in the Fee Program and in
the reports of the Transportation Corridor Agencies.
Section 6. The Development Fees are to be used pursuant
to the provisions of the Fee Program, and the provisions of the
Fee Program are hereby ratified as if approved,on the effective
date of this Resolution.
Section 7. The City Council hereby determines that
there is a reasonable relationship between the use of the
Development Fees and the type of development projects on which
the Development Fees are imposed. This determination is based
on the findings and determinations contained in the Fee Program,
the reports of the staff and consultants to the Transportation
Corridor Agencies, including, but not limited to, those related
to user trip ends that originate, end or pass through the Area
of Benefit described therein and that are attributable to new
development.
Section 8. The City Council hereby determines that
there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the
public facilities to be constructed with the proceeds of the
Development Fees and the type of development projects on which
the Development Fees are imposed. This determination is based
on the findings and determinations contained in the Fee Program
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11!
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
and in the reports of the staff and consultants to the
Transportation Corridor Agencies on this matter, including,
without limitation, the analysis relating to the trip ends
within the described Areas of Benefit as adjusted for the
various land -use categories which are attributable to new
development.
Section 9. The City Council hereby determines that
there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the
Development Fees and the cost of the Foothill/Eastern
Transportation Corridor. This determination is based on the
findings and -determinations contained within the Fee Program and
the reports of the staff and consultants to the Transportation
Corridor Agencies, including the findings regarding trip ends
within the Areas of Benefit attributable to new development.
Section 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record
a certified copy of this Resolution with the Recorder of the
County of Orange.
Section 11. This Resolution shall take effect on the
date of the approval of the interim increase in Development Fees
by the Board of Directors of the Foothill/Eastern Transportation
Corridor Agency.
APPROVED, ADOPTED AND SIGNED this 7th day of May , 1990.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
MAYOR of the City of Tustin
EXHIBIT A
SCHEDULE OF FEES
FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
Zone A:
Single Dwelling Units (SDU) $2,327
Multi -Dwelling Units (MDU) $1,359
Non -Residential (per sq. ft.) $ 3.23
Zone B:
Single Dwelling Units (SDU) $1,655
Multi -Dwelling Units (MDU) $ 963
Non -Residential (per sq. ft.) $ 1.88
LEGEND
AREA OF BEkEFIT
Q off 0" •,�w .K6 r w -six
tNaEX NAP '
_ .._.� �..,.,... L.•..
WITH OTT IOUOAKS
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING
SM4 JOAOLAN ►LLS
FOOTHLUEASIERN
TRAhSPORTAT04 CORR+OGAS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on December 4, 1989, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. the City Council of the City of Tusf.n
(the'Chy') will conduct a public hearing to consider an increase in the collection of fees (the 'Development Fees')
pursuant to the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program for the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor and
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor (the'Fee Program'). DEVELOPMENT FEES ONLY APPLY TO NEW
DEVELOPMENT. EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE
PROPOSED FEE INCREASE.
The increased Development Fees will be collected within the area of benefit (the 'Areas of Benefit') shown on ule
map contained in this notice. The estimated cost of the improvements to be constructed pursuant to the Fee Program
for the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor, excluding financing costs associated with such construction is $1,500
million dollars ($1,500,000,000). The Fee Program is designed to apportion the Development Fees within the Area of
Benefit based on the trip ends generated by new development, as determined by the trip generation tables included in
the Fee Program, which shall be assessed upon new development based upon the number of dwelling units included in
the development (for residential projects) or the gross square footage of the development (for non-residential projects).
The proposed new fee amounts are as follows:
Zone A
Single Family Dwelling Unit $2327/unit
Zone
$1655/unit
Multiple Dwelling Units $1359/unit
$ 963/unit
Non -Residential $3.23/sf
$1.88/sf
For information regarding the foregoing call (714) 557-9072
Said he will be conducted in the City Council chambers at 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California
Interested persons wishing to express their views will beiven an opportunity pportunity to do so at the public hearing. Any
protests to the increase of the Development Fees must, prior to the time of the hearing, be submitted in writing to Mary
Wynn, City Clerk, City of Tustin, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92680, prior to the close of the public hearing, and m::
identify the property owned within the Area of Benefit and the size of the property.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
9XA,t.
Lir= ��� � �� � %�'• �' �-� •. .
' DATE:
TO:
. FROM:
NOVEMBER 28, 1989
WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
Inter - Com
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
SUBJECT: INTERIM FEE INCREASE PURSUANT TO MAJOR THOROUGHFARE & BRIDGE FEE
PROGRAM FOR THE FOOTHILL/EASTERN-TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
RECOMMENDATION:
Pleasure of the City Council.
BACKGROUND:
The Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program ("Fee Program") was
originally initiated by the Orange County Board of Supervisors in 1982.
The Fee. Program.was subsequently revised and adopted by the County and
the Cities of Anaheim, Costa Mesa, Dana Point,' *Irvine," Mission Viejo,
Newport Beach, Orange, San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano, Santa Ana,
Tustin and Yorba Linda as an exhibit to the Joint Exercise of Powers
't Agreements creating the Foothill/Eastern and San Joaquin Hills
Transportation Corridor Agencies.
The intent of the Fee' Program is to require all new development to bear
a reasonable portion of the costs of the Corridors by payment of
development fees. The Fee Program contemplates that funds from other
more traditional sources (e.g., existing state and federal taxes on
motor vehicle fuel) and/or from other non-traditional sources (e.g. toll
revenues) will pay for the portion of the cost of the Corridors not
funded by development fees.
The Fee -Program estimated the cost of the Corridors, established areas
of benefit, in which development fees would be required, and calculated
fee rates for various types of land uses (e.g., single family, multi-
family, non-residential). The fee rates included in the Fee Program are
based on calculations of the percentage of corridor user trip ends that
originate or end within the Area of Benefit and which are attributable
to new growth. The Fee Program calculates that trip ends attributable
to new growth represent 48-.48% of the trips within the Foothill/Eastern
Area of Benefit. Accordingly, the Fee Program included fees on new
development in accordance with the estimated benefit to be derived from
the Corridors. A more detailed description of the methodology utilized
to develop the existing fee rates is included in the Fee Program which
is attached hereto.
In 1988 the TCA initiated a review of the estimated construction costs
for the three Corridors. The review was intended to update the cost
estimates included in the 1985 Fee Program to reflect the substantial
additional environmental, design and engineering studies conducted since
1985 and the .selection of a preferred 'alignment for the Eastern
Transportation Corridor.
r:
FEE INCREASE - MAJOR THOROUGHFARE & BRIDGE FEE
NOVEMBER 28, 1989
PAGE 2
N
In March 1989, the Corridor Design Management Group ("CDMG") submitted
cost estimates to the TCA for the two Corridors. The estimates shown in
�. 1988 for the Foothill/Eastern Corridors is $1,500 million.
The CDMG cost estimates were also reviewed by Deleuw Cather & Company.
The Deleuw Cather & Company estimates ranged from 10% - 18% lower than
the CDMG estimate for the Foothill/Eastern Corridors.
The TCA recognizes that the cost estimates could be revised further as
additional design work is completed and because of (1) the TIOPAC align-
ment alternative for the Eastern Corridor, and (2) the phasing analysis
for the Foothill and Eastern Corridors. Accordingly, the TCA adopted a
conservative approach -in setting the interim fees with the understanding
that these and other construction cost issues will be further reviewed
in 1990.
In June 1989, the Board of Directors of the TCA voted to retain the
methodology of the existing Fee Program including the existing Area of
Benefit boundaries, two fee zones within the Area of Benefit, and the
original developer share percentage of 48.48% for the Foothill/Eastern
Corridor.
In July 1989, the Board of Directors of the TCA recommended the adoption
of interim fee rate increases based on the methodology of the Fee
Program to. reflect the increased estimated cost of the Corridors
discussed above. The recommended interim fee rates do not include any
financing costs for the two Corridors. The TCA is in the process of
s developing more definitive finance plans for the Corridors. It is
t; anticipated that the finance plans will be adopted in 1990, and that the
TCA will seek a further revision to the Corridor fees at that time to
reflect- an appropriate share of Corridor financing costs. The interim
1 fee rates also reflect a recognition b the TCA that there may be some
g Y Y
i adjustment in the next several months regarding the construction cost
estimates for the Corridors in light of the TIOPAC alignment alternative
for the Eastern, and a phasing schedule for the Foothill/Eastern.
Accordingly,. the Board of the TCA recommended the interim rates to
{� reflect the increased construction costs for the Corridors, but with the-
understanding
heunderstanding that the TCA will seek a permanent adjustment in the fee
rates in calendar year 1990 after the outstanding finance and
construction costs issues have been resolved.
1
DISCUSSION:
�y} The First Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Power Agreement
i; creating the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency requires
�the Board of Directors of the TCA to annually review the development
fees imposed by the parties -to the Joint Power Agreement to finance the
FEE INCREASE - MAJOR THOROUGHFARE & BRIDGE FEE PROGRAM
y NOVEMBER 28, 1989
PAGE 3
construction of the Corridors and authorizes the modification of the
.:: Corridor fees with the approval of two-thirds of the Members of the
Agency.
Except for annual inflation adjustments, the level of the development
fees has not been revised since the Major Thoroughfare *and Bridge Fee
Program was adopted originally in 1985. At that time only conceptual
i' studies were available to form the basis for the original program and
costestimates were extremely preliminary. During the past 3-4 years,
detailed environmental, design and engineering studies have been
completed for the Corridors, and a preferred alignment has been selected
for the Eastern Transportation Corridor. In 1987 the toll method was
identified and adopted as the primary funding source for the remainder
of the financing package, necessitating further changes in the design
and engineering approach to the Corridors. These studies have now
provided more precise estimates of the construction cost of the
Corridors.
The recommended development fee rates are specifically proposed to be
interim rates. The recommended rates do not reflect any financing costs
associated with the construction of the corridors (e.g. the cost of
money). The TCA is in the process of developing more definitive finance
plans for the Corridors. Accordingly, the Board of Directors of the TCA
decided to recommend the above interim rates pending the -completion of
these additional analyses and the resolution of certain other
construction cost issues.
In order to implement the recommendation of the TCA, two-thirds of the
signatories. to •the Joint.. Powers Agreement are required to hold public
hearings and approve the proposed fee increase. Accordingly,' the TCA is
requesting that the Board of Supervisors and the City Council of each
party to the Joint Powers Agreement approve resolutions revising the
Corridor fees specified in the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee
Program. _
The existing development fee rates and the proposed interim fee rates
for the Foothill/Eastern Corridor are as follows:
Current TCA Recommended
Rates Interim Rates
Zone
Single Dwelling Units (SDU) $1,417 $2,327
Multi -Dwelling Units (MDU) $ 827 $1,359
Non -Residential (per sq. ft.) $ 1.97 $ 3.23
t• .
FEE INCREASE - MAJOR THOROUGHFARE & BRIDGE FEE PROGRAM
NOVEMBER 28, 1989
PAGE 4
Current TCA Recomme:
i
+,R Rates Interim Rat,
-i Zone B
Single Dwelling Units (S DU) $1,007 $1,655
Multi -Dwelling Units (MDU) $ 586 $ 963
t Non -Residential (per sq, ft.) $ 1.15
$ 1.88
Development fees are imposed by each party to the Joi
Agreements as a condition to the approval of new developm�
proposed fee increases do not apply to any existing developmen
A- public hearing has been set for Monday, December 4, 1989 at
in the City Council Chambers.Notices of this public •-hea:
mailed to all property owners of record within the city limi7
- latest Assessor's Office records and published in the Oran(
Register by the Transportation Corridor Agency. Additionally,
staff has posted notices at all intersections of arterial
within the City (copy of this notice is attached for informatic.
Following is a suggested procedure for the public hearing:
1. Brief overview of the requested interim fee increase by
Mr. John Meyer, representative of the TCA.
2. Open public hearing.
3. Receive testimony. either for or against the proposed fee it
4. Close public hearing. -
5. Adoption of Resolution No. 89-185 if the City Council deter
that an interim increase in development fees of the Major
Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program for the Foothill/Easter
Transportation Corridor is in order.
The Transportation Corridor Agency Board,.' staff and the
'Advisory Committee members request the Tustin City Council's ap
-..the adoption of the interim rates as outlined above.
'Bob Ledendecker
�Oirector-of Public Works/City Engineer
a
BL: my
t
Powers
The
J P.M.
were
ar the
:ountV
City
ghways
:'ise .
as
nical
-al of
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 89-185
THE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
ESTABLISHING THE AREAS OF BENEFIT.AND APPROVING AN
INTERIM INCREASE IN DEVELOPMENT FEES OF THE MAJOR
THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE FEE PROGRAM FOR THE
FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously found, pursuant
to Resolution No. 85-103 that -.the implementation of the
Foothill/ Eastern Transportation Corridor will help to relieve
congestion on existing transportation systems within the City;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 948 of the City, the
City Council adopted its major thoroughfare and bridge fee
program (the "Fee Program") providing for fees (the "Development
Fees") to be paid by building permit applicants in the City; and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary to adopt an interim
increase of the Development Fees in the amounts described in
Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference;
and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing on the proposed
increase of the Development Fee was given pursuant to the
provisions of Ordinance No. 948 and Sections 66484.3 and 65962
of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the property owners of a majority of the area
of benefit described below did not file written protests to the
increase of the Development Fees; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 66001 of the Government
Code of the State of California, it is necessary that the City
make certain findings in connection with the increase of the
Development Fees.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The boundaries of the Area of Benefit shall
be those portions of the real property located in the City of
Tustin which are described in the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge
Fee Program for the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor
(the "Fee Program") attached as Exhibit A to the First Amended
and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, dated as of
October 21, 1988 (the 'IJPA"). The Fee Program and the JPA are
on file in the City Clerk's office and are incorporated herein
by reference.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
W
Section 2. The estimated cost of these major
thoroughfares and bridges to be constructed pursuant to the Fee
Program and the JPA, excluding financing costs associated with
such construction, is in 1988 dollars as follows:
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor $1,500 Million
The' Fee Program is designed to collect 48.48% of the costs of
construction .of the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor.
Section 3. The interim increase of the Development Fees
in accordance with the Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A, is
hereby approved and ordered. It is hereby acknowledged that
this interim increase will be reviewed by the City in calendar
year 1990 to determine, among other things, an appropriate share
of financing costs to be attributed to new development and to
confirm the adequacy of the Fee Program.
Section 4. The Development Fees for development within
the Area of Benefit are based on the'trip ends generated by the
development as determined from the trip generation tables
included in the Fee Program, and shall be assessed upon new
development based upon the number of dwelling units included in
the development (for residential projects) or the gross square
footage of the development (for non-residential projects).
Section 5. The purpose of the increase of the Develop-
ment Fees is to reflect certain cost increases in connection
with the construction of bridges over waterways, railways,
freeways and canyons, and construction of major thoroughfares in
Orange County, as more fully described in the Fee Program and in
the reports of the Transportation Corridor Agencies.
Section 6. The Development Fees are to be used pursuant
to the provisions of the Fee Program, and the provisions of the
Fee Program are hereby ratified as if approved on the effective
date of this Resolution.
Section 7. The City Council hereby determines that
there is a reasonable relationship between the use of the
Development Fees and the type of development projects on which
the Development Fees are imposed. This determination is based
on the findings and determinations contained in the Fee Program,
the reports of the staff and consultants to the Transportation
Corridor Agencies, including, but not limited to, those related
to user trip ends that originate, end or pass through the Area
of Benefit described therein and that are attributable to new
development.
Section 8. The City Council hereby determines that
there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the
public facilities to be constructed with the proceeds of the
Development Fees and the type of development projects on which
the Development Fees are imposed. This determination is based
on the findings and determinations contained in the Fee Program
ff
c
V
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18'
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
and in the reports of the staff and consultants to the
Transportation Corridor Agencies on this matter, including,
Z without limitation, the analysis relating to the trip ends
within the described Areas of Benefit as adjusted for the
3 various land -use categories which are attributable to new
development.
Section 9. The City Council hereby determines that
there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the
Development Fees and the cost of the. Foothill/Eastern
Transportation Corridor. This determinationis based on the
findings and determinations contained within the Fee Program and
the reports of the staff and consultants to the Transportation
Corridor Agencies, including the findings regarding trip ends
C within the Areas of Benefit attributable to new development.
Section 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record
a certified copy of this Resolution with the Recorder of the
County of Orange.
Section 11. This Resolution shall take effect on the
date of the approval of the interim increase in Development Fees
by the Board of Directors of the Foothill/Eastern Transportation
Corridor Agency.
APPROVED, ADOPTED AND SIGNED this day of
1989.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
MAYOR of the City of Tustin
EXHIBIT A
SCHEDULE OF FEES
FOOTHILLZEASTERN
Zone A
Single Dwelling Units (SDU)
Multi -Dwelling Units (MDU)
Non -Residential (per sq. ft.)
Zone B
Single Dwelling Units (SDU)
Multi -Dwelling Units (MDU)
Non -Residential (per -sq. ft.)
$2,327
$1,359
$ 3.23
$1,655
$ 963
$.1.88
LEGEND AREA OF 6EWIT SA11 JOAOLAN HLLS
n a' '%& 04� •`� �`� 00EX NAP f OOTHLUEAS TERN
�..,,..,.� ..... WITH CITY DDLtOAR►ES TRANSPORTAT" COMMAS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on December 4, 1989, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. the City Council of the City of Tusfn
(the'Chy') will conduct a public hearing to consider an increase in the collection of fees (the 'Development Fees')
pursuant to the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program for the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor and
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor (the *Fee Program'). DEVELOPMENT FEES ONLY APPLY TO NEW
DEVELOPMENT. EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE
PROPOSED FEE INCREASE.
The increased Development Fees will be collected within the area of benefit (the 'Areas of Benefit') shown on cne
map contained in this notice. The estimated cost of the improvements to be constructed pursuant to the Fee Program
for the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor, excluding financing costs associated with such construction is $1,500
million dollars ($1,500,000,000), The Fee Program is designed to apportion the Development Fees within the Area of
Benerrt based on the trip ends generated by new development, as determined by the trip generation tables included in
the Fee Program, which shall be assessed upon new development based upon the number of dwelling units included in
the development (for residential projects) or the gross square footage of the development (for non-residential projects).
The proposed new fee amounts are as follows:
Zone A Zone
Single Family Dwelling Unit $2327/unit $1655/unit
Multiple Dwelling Units $1359/unit $ 963/unit
Non -Residential $3.23/sf $1.88/sf
For information regarding the foregoing call (714) 557-9072
Said hearing will be conducted in the City Council chambers at 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
_. Interested persons wishing to express their views will beiven an opportunity pponunity to do so at the public hearing. Any
protests to tNe increase of the Development Fees must, prior to the time of the hearing, be submitted in writing to Mary
Wynn, City Clerk, City of Tustin, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92680, prior to the close of the public hearing, and m ,.
identify the property owned within the Area of Benefit and the size of the property.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
MINUTES OF A REGULAR 'TING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL HE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIF% _..iIA
DECEMBER 41 1989
I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The meeting was called to order by -Mayor Edgar at 7:00 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance
was led by Councilman Kelly.
II. INVOCATION
The Invocation was given by Pastor Jeff Slipp, Colonial Bible Church.
1
III. ROLL CALL
Council Present: Richard B. Edgar, Mayor
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem
John Kelly
Earl J. Prescott
(Council position vacant)
Council Absent: None
Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Christine Shingleton, Dir./Community Development
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Royleen White, Dir./Community & Admin. Services
Daniel Fox, Senior Planner
Houston Williams, Police Lieutenant
Valerie Whiteman, Acting Chief Deputy City Clerk
Approximately 80 in the audience
IV. PRESENTATIONS
^� 1. RESOLUTION FOR RUBY MAY
k
Mayor. Edgar read and presented a Resolution to Ruby May,
commending her for volunteerism, dedication and service to the
City.
Ruby May expressed her appreciation to everyone, especially
Isabelle McClements, who had supported and encouraged her to
continue as a volunteer.
2. COMMENDATION FOR ISABELLE McCLEMENTS
Mayor Edgar read and presented a Commendation to Isabelle
McClements commending her for nine and one-half years as
Recreation Coordinator for the City. The Commendation recognized
her dedicated service and contributions to the community.
Isabelle McClements thanked the Council, staff and the City for
the Commendation. She expressed what a pleasure and privilege
it had been to be an employee of the City.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. INTERIM FEE INCREASE PURSUANT TO MAJOR THOROUGHFARE & BRIDGE FEE
PROGRAM FOR THE FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
Jerry Bennett, Chief Engineer of Transportation Corridor
j Agencies, explained the intent of the Fee Program which required
all new development to bear a reasonable portion of the Corridor
costs by payment of development fees.
Mayor Edgar explained that the fees collected since 1985 were
! computed upon the assumed dollar value of what the Corridor would
cost in 1985 and the fee charged to developers was approximately
CITY COUNC 'INUTES
Page 2, 12 19
48% of the total road development cost. Due to a higher cost for
road development than originally estimated, an increase greater
than an inflationary increase would be needed and he noted the
fees would place 48% of the cost for roads on developers and 32%
would be paid by toll fees.
Mayor Edgar opened the Public Hearing at 7:14 p.m. There were
no speakers on the subject and the Public Hearing was closed.
Councilman Kelly supported the plan to alleviate the traffic
crisis, but was disappointed that the report stated the cost
could be revised further for additional design work. He stated
he could not support any additional fee levied on the community.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy stated the intent of the fee program was
requiring new development to pay for their impact upon the
citizens of Tustin because previously there was development
without planning for roads. It was felt when Proposition No. 13
passed, development should pay their portion of solving problems
created with their densities and housing. She felt that Cities
could not discontinue road construction because of escalated
costs and this was a complicated, carefully planned program.
Councilman Prescott desired the funding source to be toll booths,
placing the cost on motorists and truck firms.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to support the fee
program as presented by staff.
The motion died 2-2, Edgar and Kennedy favored, Kelly and
Prescott opposed. 54
2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-03, ZONE CHANGE 89-01, TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP 89-110; APPLICANT: IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPANY
Daniel Fox, Senior Planner, gave a staff report regarding the 1
proposed project.
Mayor Edgar opened the Public Hearing at 7:23 p.m. There were
no speakers on the subject and the Public Hearing was closed.
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Kelly, to adopt the
following Resolution No. 89-182 certifying the Negative
Declaration for General Plan Amendment, Zone Change 89-01 and
Tentative Parcel Map 89-110:
RESOLUTION NO. 89-182 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AS ADEQUATE FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-03, ZONE CHANGE 89-01
AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 89-110, INCLUDING REQUIRED FINDINGS
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
The motion carried 4-0.
It was moved by Kelly. seconded by Prescott, to adopt the
following Resolution No. 89-183 approving General Plan Amendment
89-03:
RESOLUTION NO. 89-183 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 8.9-
03, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
FROM P&I (PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL) TO I (INDUSTRIAL) ON THE
PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHEASTERLY OF FUTURE JAMBOREE ROAD ADJACENT
TO PETERS CANYON WASH
The motion carried 4-0. 81