HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 06-18-90`INUTES OF A REGULAR MEETT`
JF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T1
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
JUNE 41 1990
I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 7:00 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance
was led by Councilmember Potts.
II. INVOCATION
The Invocation was given by Chaplain Charles Brown of the Marine
Corps Air Station.
III. ROLL CALL
Council Present: Richard B. Edgar, Mayor
Charles E. Puckett, Mayor Pro Tem
Leslie Pontious
Jim Potts
Earl J. Prescott
Council Absent: None
Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Christine Shingleton, Dir./Community Development
W. Douglas Franks, Chief of Police
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent
Susan Tebo, Senior Planner
Steve Rubin, Associate Planner
Beth Schoemann, Associate Planner
Valerie Whiteman, Chief Deputy City Clerk
Jennifer Raue, Administrative Assistant
Approximately 90 in the audience
IV. PROCLAMATIONS
1. 1989 MISS TUSTIN - CATHERINE MARIE REYNOLDS
1990 MISS TUSTIN INTRODUCTION - REBECCA FUHRMAN
Mayor Edgar read and presented a proclamation to Catherine
Reynolds in recognition of her service to the community during
her reign as Miss Tustin, 1989.
Cathy Reynolds stated it had been a privilege and an honor to
represent the City.
Donna Gilger, Executive Director of the Miss Tustin Scholarship
Beauty Pageant, introduced the 1990 Miss Tustin, Rebecca Fuhrman.
Rebecca Fuhrman said she was honored to be chosen as Miss Tustin
and looked forward to participating in City events.
2. PARTNERS IN EDUCATION - TUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT AND TUSTIN
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Mayor Edgar read and presented proclamations to Nancy Diaz -Miller
and Sgt. Steve Lewis acknowledging a unique partnership between
the Tustin Police Department and Tustin Unified School District
which implemented programs in the schools and community to
provide safe school environments.
Nancy Diaz -Miller, representing the Tustin Unified School
District, thanked the City Council, Chief Franks, Steve Lewis and
Nancy Rizzo for their continued support and encouraged the City
and the school district to consider future community needs.
Sgt. Steve Lewis, representing the Tustin Police Department,
thanked everyone for the recognition and Nancy Diaz -Miller for
their enjoyable, productive partnership.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 6-4-90
_0BLIC INPUT
TUSTIN HIGH SCHOOL GRAD NITE PROGRAM
Tom Aufdemberg, Chairman of Tustin High School Grad Nite Committee,
requested City financial assistance for their program.
Council concurred to agendize the issue at their June 18, 1990
Council meeting.
V. CLOSED SESSION
At 7:10 p.m, Mayor Edgar announced the City Council would recess to
Closed Session to confer with the City Attorney regarding threatened
litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (b)(1). (In
the reasonable opinion of the City Council, based on an existing set
of specific facts and circumstances, the threat of litigation against
the City is likely or would be likely if discussed in an open and
public meeting).
The meeting reconvened at 7:30 p.m.
VI. PUBLIC HEARING
1. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
90-08 (15642 PASADENA AVENUE)
Steve Rubin, Associate Planner, reported on the permit background
of the project to build an 11 -unit apartment complex measuring
2-1/2 stories in height on Pasadena Avenue and noted that a
Conditional Use Permit was required because the structure,
located in an R-3 zone, was greater than 20 feet in height or 1
story and was within 150 feet of an R-1 (single family
residential) zone. It was discovered, after receiving complaints
from residents and reviewing the mailing list used for
notification of the project's public hearing, that the property
owners of the single family homes had not been included on the
mailing list and, therefore, had not received a public hearing
notice. The City Attorney had then determined that the original
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) was invalid, the building permits
were revoked, and construction was halted. The applicant
submitted a new accurate mailing list and a second public hearing
was scheduled in April, 1990. In response to public testimony
received on April 9, the Planning Commission directed the
applicant to modify the project in an attempt to address concerns
raised by the residents, which were: lack of conformity with
surrounding area, impact upon privacy, shade/shadow conditions,
inadequate parking, traffic hazards, decreased property values,
light/glare shielding, precedent setting for similar projects
within the area and redesign to one-story level. Modifications
proposed by the applicant included elimination of a corner
bedroom from the end unit of each building, altered roof design,
use of obscure glass and window blinders. Several alternatives
available to the City Council were outlined: (1) Uphold the
Planning Commission's decision and deny CUP 90-08, (2) Approve
CUP 90-08 based upon modifications proposed by the applicant, or
( 3 ) Direct the applicant to further revise the project and return
the matter to the Planning Commission.
Mayor Edgar opened the Public Hearing at 7:45 p.m.
The following member of the audience spoke in favor of approving
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-08:
Joel Ward, attorney representing the applicant, Feridoun Rezai
The following members of the audience spoke in opposition to
approving Conditional Use Permit 90-08:
Kathleen L. Arnold, 15631 Myrtle Avenue, Tustin
Paul Zukowsky, 15641 Myrtle Avenue, Tustin
Sandra Zukowsky, 15641 Myrtle Avenue, Tustin
Linda Turner, 17252 Medallion, Tustin
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 6-4-90
Kathleen M. Arnold, 15631 Myrtle Avenue, Tustin
from 15702 Myrtle Avenue resident)
Lakonda Mitchell, 15621 Myrtle Avenue, Tustin
David Weresby, 15662 Myrtle Avenue, Tustin
William McQue, 15641 Pacific Street, Tustin
Dean Karels, 17191 Corla Avenue, Tustin
John Landolfi, 15611 Myrtle Avenue, Tustin
Mary O'Rourke, 15632 Myrtle Avenue, Tustin
Cindy Williamson, 15711 Pacific Street, Tustin
Lisa Macknimee, 15671 California Street, Tustin
Joe Turner, 17252 Medallion, Tustin
(read letter
There were no other speakers on the subject and the Public
Hearing was closed at 8:45 p.m.
Mayor Edgar stated an injustice had occurred to both the
residents and the applicant; a legitimate Use Permit had been
issued to the developer but without proper notification to the
residents. He suggested the residents and applicant meet and
attempt to reach a mutually agreeable compromise. If the Council
ruled in either direction, the end result would be lawsuits on
both sides involving extensive legal fees. He felt it would be
more beneficial to find a common ground rather than force the
issue into court.
Councilmember Pontious also hoped more could be done to find a
common ground. She was particularly concerned about the issue
of privacy and wanted the applicant to be aware that should this
issue not be resolved, her inclination would be toward a more
conservative side than the mitigating measures he had proposed.
Mayor Pro Tem Puckett stated he had visited the project and
agreed with the residents that the project did not conform to the
community and was a monstrosity. It was evident to him that if
all residents had been noticed, the Use Permit would not have
been granted. He opposed setting a precedent by allowing a
2-1/2 story building in that area and suggested reducing the mass
toward the rear of the lot. If that was not possible, he would
support the Planning Commission's decision. He, however, agreed
that the residents should meet with the developer and attempt to
reach a compromise that was acceptable to everyone.
Councilmember Potts said it did not matter if shadows covered
property or property values were decreased, what mattered was the
developer failed to notify seventeen residents and that was
deceit. He was not willing to compromise on the matter and
wanted to proceed accordingly.
Councilmember Prescott agreed with the Planning Commission's
decision and intended to support the denial.
It was moved by Prescott, seconded by Potts, to uphold the
Planning Commission's decision and deny Conditional Use Permit
90-08.
Motion failed 2-3, Edgar, Puckett and Pontious opposed.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Puckett, that the Public
Hearing be continued until the June 18, 1990 Council meeting; and
as a condition of that continuance, a meeting to reach a
compromise solution be held on June 7, 1990, at 7:00 p.m.,
between the applicant, residents, City Attorney and staff.
Motion carried 5-0.
VII. PUBLIC INPUT
1. UNSATISFACTORY REMOVAL OF GRAFFITI (CORLA AVENUE AREA)
Dean Karels, 17191 Corla Avenue, reported graffiti in his
neighborhood had been unsatisfactorily removed by City
maintenance crews.
Mayor Edgar directed staff to investigate.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 6-4-90
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
It .was moved by Puckett, seconded by Pontious, to approve the Consent
Calendar. Motion carried 5-0.
1.1 APPROVED MINUTES - MAY 21, 1990, REGULAR MEETING
2. APPROVED DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,055,196.75
RATIFIED PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $252,117.68
3.-.' SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH COAST COMMUNITY_COLLEGE DISTRICT
Approved the Inter -agency Services Agreement between the Coast
Community College District and the. City of Tustin Police
Department.
4. RESOLUTION NO. 90-60 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP 88-316
Approved Final Parcel Map 88-316 by adoption of Resolution No.
90-60.
5. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE 3/4 TON PICK-UP TRUCK
Authorized staff to purchase a 3/4 ton pick-up truck from
Fuller Ford in Chula Vista, California, in the amount of
$14,708.81.
6. RESOLUTION NO. 90-59 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NOS. 13701
AND 13990
Approved Final Tract Map Nos. 13701 and 13990 by adoption of
Resolution No. 90-59.
7. RESOLUTION NO. 90-62 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND
AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR STREET
WIDENING AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF RED HILL AND WALNUT AVENUES (AHFP #1218)
Adopted Resolution No. 90-62 accepting said work and
authorizing the recordation of the Notice of Completion.
8. RESOLUTION NO. 90-64 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF WATER MAINS ON MALTA STREET, VALE AVENUE,
HEWES AVENUE AND "C" STREET, AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR
BIDS
Adopted Resolution No. 90-64 approving plans and
specifications for subject project and directing the City
Clerk to advertise for bids.
9. RESOLUTION NO. 90-63 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF WATER MAINS ON PROSPECT AVENUE, GARLAND
AVENUE, WREATH PLACE AND CHAPLET PLACE, AND AUTHORIZING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
Adopted Resolution No. 90-63 approving plans and
specifications for subject project and directing the City
Clerk to advertise for bids.
10. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE RIDING MOWER AND TRAILER
Authorized staff to purchase a riding lawnmower and trailer
from Lawnmowers Plus, San Marcos, California, in the amount
of $10,406.44.
IX. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None
X. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION - None
XI. OLD BUSINESS
1. CARL'S JR. POLE SIGN
It was moved by Puckett, seconded by Pontious, to continue this
item to allow the City Attorney adequate opportunity to study the
matter further.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 6-4-90
The following member of the audience requested that the City
Attorney and Carl Karcher legal representatives be allowed to
meet and reach language agreement:
John Baker, representing Carl Karcher Enterprises
As a substitute motion, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by
Prescott, to authorize the attorneys for the City and Carl
Karcher Enterprises to confer on the required language.
Substitute motion carried 5-0.
2. PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
Council concurred to conduct interviews of Planning Commission
candidates on June 18, 1990, at 6:30 p.m. and appoint a Planning
Commissioner during the regular meeting on that date.
XII. NEW BUSINESS
1. RENT CONTROL FOR TRAIL -A -WAY MOBILE HOME PARR
The following members of the audience spoke in favor of rent
control at Trail -a -Way mobile home park and expressed concern
_ with conditions at the park such as excessive rent increases,
disrepair, inability to attract buyers, and utility costs:
Genelle Bierman, 1782 Nisson Rd. #31, Tustin
Eleanor Robinson, 1782 Nisson Rd., Tustin
The following members of the audience spoke in opposition to rent
control:
Vickie Talley, Executive Director of Manufactured Housing
Educational Trust
Brandon Rosenberg
Council/speaker discussion followed regarding qualifications for
Government Section 8 rental subsidy program, and resources
available through Mobile Home Rental Assistance Program and City
staff.
Councilmember Prescott requested staff provide assistance
information to the Trail -A -Way residents who spoke.
Mayor Edgar said the concept of rent control had not succeeded
and was not in concert with the American concept of free
enterprise. To implement rent control to provide for the needs
of the elderly or handicapped was an overkill. He was, however,
pleased to learn that the Orange County Mobile Home Rental
Assistance Program would subsidize those in need until
governmental housing assistance was received.
Mayor Pro Tem Puckett added he was also opposed to rent control
but wanted the Trail -A -Way residents to learn what alternatives
were available to them.
Councilmember Pontious felt strongly that rent control had long-
term, negative impacts and was an ineffective short-term
solution. She encouraged the Trail -A -Way residents to work with
the Manufactured Housing Educational Trust and City staff to
resolve their problems.
XIII. REPORTS
1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - MAY 29, 1990
Councilmember Prescott requested the record reflect his "no" vote
on Item No. 8 (Appeal of Design Review 90-17).
It was moved by Pontious, seconded by Puckett, to ratify the
Planning Commission Action Agenda of May 29, 1990.
Motion carried 5-0.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 6-4-90
2. AB 939 STATUS REPORT - CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT
OF 1989
Jennifer Raue, Public Works Administrative Assistant, reported
that she had outlined the nine elements that the City would have
to address within the next year to satisfy the extensive
requirements of AB 939. She had received positive responses from
citizens who were eager to begin recycling and the City was
working with Great Western Reclamation on the programs that would
be offered to the City. Staff anticipated hiring a consultant
to assist with major elements such as Waste Characterization
Study, Recycling and public awareness/education.
Council/staff discussion followed regarding League of Cities
programs, AB 1820, area recycling centers, and use of Tustin
Today to educate the public.
It was moved by Prescott, seconded by Pontious, to receive and
file subject report.
_ Motion carried 4-0, Edgar absent.
The following member of the audience spoke in support of
recycling and the need for business recycling education:
Zipora Shifberg-Mencher, 16282 Main St. #3B, Tustin
XIV. PUBLIC INPUT - None
XV. OTHER BUSINESS
1. HIKING TRAILS AND BIKE PATHS
Councilmember Potts requested a status report on hiking trails
and bike paths within the City.
2. MISS TUSTIN PAGEANT / CHILI COOK -OFF
Councilmember Prescott noted that both the Miss Tustin Pageant
and the Chili Cook -Off were successful events, with the Chamber
of Commerce chili taking top honor.
3. RECIPIENTS OF IRVINE COMPANY SPECTRUM LEADERSHIP AWARD
Mayor Pro Tem Puckett reported that two high school students from
Tustin were given the Irvine Company Spectrum Leadership Award.
Mayor Edgar noted that both students would be awarded
proclamations at the June 18, 1990 Council meeting.
XVI. CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Edgar announced the City Council would recess to Closed Session
to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Sebtion
54957; and pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer
with the City Attorney regarding pending litigation which has been
initiated formally and to which the City is a party. The title of
the litigation is Harris vs City of Tustin.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 6-4-90
XVII. ADJOURNMENT
At 9:40 p.m., the meeting was recessed to the Redevelopment Agency
and to the above Closed Session, and then adjourned to the next
Regular Meeting on June 18, 1990, at 7:00 p.m.
FOLLOWING CLOSED SESSION
It was moved by Pontious, seconded by Puckett, to approve the
Management Compensation Program, effective July 1, 1990, as
recommended by the City Manager.
Motion carried 5-0.
MAYOR
CITY CLERK