The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 07-02-90A C T I O N A G E N D A TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 25, 1990 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION REPORTS NO. 1 7/2/90 ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Le Jeune, Shaheen, Baker, Kasparian, Kasalek PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 1. Minutes of the June 11, 1990 Planning Commission Meeting 2. Swearing In of New Planning Commissioner Commissioner Baker moved, Shaheen seconded to approve the consent calendar as revised; Minutes, page 18, Commissioner Kasparian, should read: "...telephone pole and a light standard that... Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 3. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14068, DESIGN REVIEW 89-70 APPLICANT\ WILLIAM LYON COMPANY OWNER: 4490 VON KARMAN NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 LOCATION: LOTS 12, "L" AND "N" OF TRACT 12870 Planning Commission Action Agenda June 25, 1990 Page 2 ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: RECOMMENDATION MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN THIS PROJECT IS COVERED BY A PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED. EIR (NO. 85-2) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN. NO ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED. 1. AUTHORIZATION TO CREATE 10 NUMBERED AND 12 LETTERED LOTS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TO ACCOMMODATE 200 DWELLING UNITS. 2. APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. It is recommended that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. Approve the Environmental Determination for the project by adopting Resolution No. 2790; 2. Approve Design Review 89-70 by adopting Resolution No. 2791, as submitted or revised • and 3. Recommend City Council approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14068 by adopting Resolution No. 2792, as submitted or revised. Presentation: Sara Pashalides, Associate Planner Commissioner Shaheen moved, Baker seconded to approve Resolution No. 2790 as submitted. Motion carried 5-0. Commissioner Shaheen moved, Le Jeune seconded to approve Resolution No. 2791 as revised; Exhibit A, Page 2, item C should read: "...requirements of Condition 4..1 and 4.2 in Exhibit..."; Exhibit A, Page 8, item 5.1 should read: "...Condition 9.1 through 9.4 of Exhibit...". Motion carried 5-0. Commissioner Shaheen moved, Le Jeune seconded to approve Resolution No. 2792 as submitted. Motion carried 5-0. 4. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14168 AND DESIGN REVIEW 89- 76 APPLICANT\ BAYCREST DEVELOPMENT CO. OWNER: 1 CIVIC PLAZA, SUITE 275 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 C/O MR. CARY BREN LOCATION: LOTS 81 28, MM, NN, PP, QQ, GGG, HHH, III AND JJJ OF AMENDED MAP NO. 1 OF TRACT 12870, NORTHWEST CORNER OF TUSTIN RANCH ROAD AND TOWNSHIP DRIVE ZONING: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CATEGORY; EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN Planning Commission Action Agenda June 25, 1990 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: THIS PROJECT IS COVERED BY A PREVIOUS EIR (85-2) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN. NO ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED. REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO SUBDIVIDE 22.2 ACRES INTO 137 NUMBERED LOTS TO ACCOMMODATE 137 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS AND 30 LETTERED LOTS FOR LANDSCAPING, PRIVATE STREETS AND RECREATION PURPOSES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. Approve the Environmental Determination for the project by adoption of Resolution No. 2787; 2. Approve Design Review 89-76 by adoption of Resolution No. 2788, as submitted or revised; and 3. Recommend to the City Council approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14168 by adoption of Resolution No. 2789, as submitted or revised. Presentation: Daniel Fox, Senior Planner OLD BUSINESS 5. Development Status Report Presentation: Daniel Fox, Senior Planner Commissioner Rasparian moved, Shaheen seconded to approve Resolution No. 2787 as submitted. Motion carried 5-0. Commissioner Rasparian moved, Baker seconded to approve Resolution No. 2788 as revised; Exhibit A, Page 2, item C should read: "...Condition 4.1 throuch 4.3 in Exhibit...". Motion carried 5- 0. Commissioner Rasparian moved, Baker seconded to approve Resolution No. 2789 as revised; Exhibit A, Page 5, item 4.3 should read: "...greater than 5 feet...". Motion carried 5-0. NEW BUSINESS STAFF CONCERNS Commissioner Le Jeune questioned the Commissions or Councils ability to require the subsequent removal or reduction in height as it relates to the 35 foot sign for Carl's Jr. Commissioner Le Jeune also inquired regarding the Commissions ability to place time Planning Commission Action Agenda June 25, 1990 Page 4 limits on use permits as a precedent for future projects. Tom Nixon replied he would check on this and report back to the Commission. 6. Report on Actions taken at June 18, 1990 City Council Meeting. Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development COMMISSION CONCERNS Commissioner Kasparian Asked if the Planning Commissioners would be able to attend the APA Conference in September. The Assistant Director said she would check and report back to him. -Wanted to commend the City for the quick response in repairing the loose bench. -Asked if we could follow up on locating responsible party for Cocos Restaurant on 17th Street for the removal of the abandoned sign. Commissioner Baker -Inquired as to why they received duplicate plans, they receive copies of plans submitted by applicant and there are also copies in staff reports. Staff advised that applicant submits only enough full size sets for the Commissioners, that staff reports are for the public and therefore reduced plans need to be included. Staff questioned the Commission regarding their preference of full size plans verses reduced plans. Commissioner Le Jeune -Commented that in reviewing the Planning Commissioners Institute tapes he learned that Resolution findings should be very specific and inquired if maybe we were being to general. Tom Nixon replied that from a legal standpoint we should be as specific as possible. The Assistant Director advised that usually staff findings are adequate and that when denying a project findings need to be and are more specific. -Asked if the Southwest Neighborhood Stabilization Program workshop was open to the public. The Assistant Director confirmed that it would be. Planning Commission Action Agenda June 25, 1990 Page 5 ADJOURNMENT At 8:10 p.m. Commissioner Baker moved, Shaheen seconded to adjourn meeting to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on July 9, 1990 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin. Motion carried 5-0.