HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 09-17-90I.
II.
MINU7 OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR M [NG
,jF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
SEPTEMBER 4, 1990
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CONSENT CALEND R N0. 1
9/17/90
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 7:00 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiiance
was led by Councilmember Potts.
INVOCATION
The Invocation was given by Reverend Reese Riley, St. Pawl's
Episcopal Church.
III. ROLL CALL
IV.
Council Present: Richard B. Edgar, Mayor
Charles E. Puckett, Mayor Pro Tem
Leslie Pontious
Jim Potts
Earl J. Prescott
Council Absent: None
Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Rita Westfield, Asst. Dir./Community Develo
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Work
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Fred Wakefield, Captain/Police Department
Bettie Correa, Senior Personnel Analyst
Valerie Whiteman, Chief Deputy City Clerk
Paula Rankin, Associate Planner
Approximately 20 in the audience
PROCLAMATIONS
1. TUSTIN BOBBY SOX ALL-STAR TEAM
Mayor Edgar read and presented proclamations to the Tustin I
Sox All-Star Team who placed second in the National Tournz
of Champions.
nt
obby
ment
Carrie Leach, team manager, thanked the merchants of Tustin and
the parents for the team support.
i
2. CALIFORNIA RIDESHARE WEER, OCTOBER 1-51 1990
Mayor Edgar read and presented a proclamation declaring
California Rideshare Week, October 1-5, 1990.
Rita Westfield, Assistant Director of Community Development,
accepted the proclamation on behalf of SCAG.
PROCLAMATION REQUEST - MARY GRAY
Councilmember Potts requested a proclamation be presented at the
September 17th Council meeting to Mary Gray in recognition of her
anti -gang dress code program initiated at Currie Middle School.
Council concurred.
I
V. PUBLIC HEARING
1. APPEAL OF A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PE
90-15 (BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES, INC.)
Paula Rankin, Associate Planner, reported the Planning Commi
adopted Resolution No. 2794 approving Conditional Use Permi
15 and Design Review 89-58. The project included
construction of a full-service mechanized car wash, gas,
sales and automotive service bays, and a convenience mark
a 2.181 -acre site in the Tustin Market Place. A sign progra
also approved under Conditional Use Permit 90-15
established a customized sign program for the multi -use fact
The Planning Commission allowed the applicant, Beacon
Enterprises, Inc., a total or 87.75 square feet of sign
T
3s,ion
t 90 -
the
)1 ine
)t oil
m was
4hich
Lity.
Bay
area
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 9-4-90
which exceeded the allowable area by approximately 23 s uare
feet. The applicant had also requested two logos on the outh
and east sides; however, one of the conditions of approval of
Resolution No. 2794 limited the area of each wall sign to a
maximum of 25 square feet. The applicant had appealed Condition
No. 6.3 of Resolution No. 2794 and proposed an alternative that
would allow the additional 23 square feet of sign area o be
evenly divided between two logos.
I
Mayor Edgar commended Beacon Bay Enterprises, the Planning
Commission, and staff on reaching a compromise.
Mayor Edgar opened the Public Hearing at 7:10 p.m.
The following member of the audience stated he was available for
questions:
Bill McCullogh, Architect for Beacon Bay Enterprises 260
Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach
II
There were no other speakers on the subject and the P* is
Hearing was closed at 7:10 p.m.
i
It was moved by Puckett, seconded by Pontious, to approv the
appeal to amend the approved sign program for the project and
modify Condition No. 6.3 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2794
relating to Conditional Use Permit 90-15 by adopting the
following Resolution No. 90-98: !
RESOLUTION NO. 90-98 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 0 THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPEAL TO AMEN THE
SIGN PROGRAM, APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIO NO.
2794, AND MODIFY CONDITION NO. 6.3 OF EXHIBIT A OF P NING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2794, RELATING TO ALLOWABLE SIGN EAS
FOR BEACON BAY CAR WASH AT 2762 EL CAMINO REAL.
Motion carried 5-0.
VI. PUBLIC INPUT
1. AIRCRAFT NOISE
Judy Sutliff, 17962 Theodora Drive, Tustin, expressed her co cern
regarding the number of aircraft flights and noise over her ome.
Mayor Edgar responded that if aircraft maintained a certain �oise
decibel level, the airport was permitted more flights; however,
the City was monitoring the noise/energy level of flights over
the City.
i
Council/speaker/staff discussion followed regarding future
airport sites, flight paths and noise levels.
i
Rita Westfield, Assistant Director of Community Development,
stated the Community Development Department accepted citizen
complaints regarding aircraft noise and also had a referral
number for a contact person at the airport for regist ering
additional complaints.
i
William Huston, City Manager, suggested the speaker contact the
County Board of Supervisors. The City had no jurisdiction or
control as to the number of aircraft or flight patterns, b t did
monitor noise levels for compliance with State law and current
noise levels were in compliance.
VII. CONSENT CALENDAR
i
It was moved by Puckett, seconded by Pgntious, to approve the Cdnsent
Calendar. Motion carried 5-0.
1. APPROVED MINUTES - AUGUST 20, 1990, REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 9-4-90
2. APPROVED DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,928,332.45
RATIFIED PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $246,134.99
3. RESOLUTION NO. 90-79 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, 90-
104 LOCATED AT 14041 NEWPORT AVENUE
Adopted revised Resolution No. 90-79.
4. PROPOSED CONTRACTS FROM THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR PROVISIOP OF
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS, ORANGE STREET IMPROVEM NTS
Approved the proposed contracts from the County of Orange for
provision of public facilities and improvements, Orange Street
improvements.
5. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF EDINGER AVENUE STORM BRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN RED HILL AVENUE AND DEL AMO AVENUE PRCMJECT
NO. 900026
Awarded the contract for the subject project to the, low
bidder, Silverie & LeBouef JV of Anaheim, California, in the
amount of $399,699.00.
6. RESOLUTION NO. 90-116 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMEN AND
AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT 85-1 IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED AS THE LAURELWOOD !R.V.
STORAGE FACILITY
Adopted Resolution No. 90-116 accepting improve#ents
constructed as the Laurelwood R.V. storage facility) and
authorized the recordation of the Notice of Completion for
said improvements.
7. RESOLUTION NO. 90-113 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND
AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF WATER MAIN
IMPROVEMENTS ON HEWES AVENUE, BIKINI PLACE, SAIGON LANEi AND
LINDALE LANE
Adopted Resolution No. 90-113 accepting said work' and
authorized the recordation of the Notice of Completion.'
S. RESOLUTION NO. 90-115 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL O� THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
ANNUAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR EL CAMINO REAL
Adopted Resolution No. 90-115 approving specifications for
subject project and authorized advertisement for bids.
9. RESOLUTION NO. 90-114 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
ANNUAL PAVEMENT MARKING AND STRIPING PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
Adopted Resolution No. 90-114 approving specification for
subject project and authorized advertisement for bids.
10. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT - SAN DIEGO CREEK SEDIMENT MONITPRING
PROGRAM
Approved the Cooperative Agreement for the San Diego reek
Sediment Monitoring Program and authorized the May" to
execute said agreement subject to the City Attorney's rview
and approval of said agreement.
11. AUTHORIZATION TO REQUEST BIDS FOR CHLORINATION UNITS
Authorized staff to solicit bids for two portable chlorination
units at a total cost of $30,000, and carry over rema ning
budgeted funds in the amount of $95,000 to be use for
installation of permanent chlorination equipment in FY 9I1-92.
i
12. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT ON BROWNING AV NUE,
ENRAMADA DRIVE, ORVILLINA DRIVE, PROJECT NOS. 600070, 60007'1 AND
600073
Awarded the contract for subject project to Tomar Engineelring,
Inc. of Corona, California, in the amount of $110,745.00.
i
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 9-4-90
i
I
13. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 90-22; CLAIMANT-TAL SCHOFIELD, DAT: OF
LOSS -2/8/90; DATE FILED WITH CITY -6/25/90
Rejected subject claim for personal injury damages and
property damage of an undetermined amount.
VIII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION
1. ORDINANCE NO. 1048 - APRIL GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
It was moved by Prescott. seconded by Puckett, that Ordinance No.
1048 have first reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0.
Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1048 by
the City Clerk, it was moved by Pontious, seconded by Puckett,
that Ordinance No. 1048 be introduced as follows:
i
ORDINANCE NO. 1048 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 980 WHICH REQUIRED
THE CITY'S GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE CONSOLIDATED WITH THE
STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION HELD IN NOVEMBER OF EVEN NUMBERED
YEARS PURSUANT TO SECTION 36503.5 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
Motion carried 4-1, Prescott opposed.
�'X. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION - None
X. OLD BUSINESS - None
XI. NEW BUSINESS
1. PURCHASE OF SEMI-AUTOMATIC WEAPONS - POLICE DEPARTMENT
Councilmember Potts reported that Tustin Police Officers were
allowed to personally purchase and carry semi-automatic we pons
which were considered superior overall to revolvers for police
work, and he supported City payment for semi-automatic weapons.
It was moved by Potts, seconded by Edgar, to purchase semi-
automatic weapons and leather gear for new officers an to
reimburse officers for same who currently used semi -auto atic
weapons and leather gear.
Motion carried 5-0.
XII. REPORTS
1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - AUGUST 27, 1990
It was moved by Puckett, seconded by Pontious, to ratify, the
Planning Commission Action Agenda of August 27, 1990.
Motion carried 5-0.
2. NEWPORT AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL REVIEW
It was moved by Pontious, seconded by Potts, to receive andj file
subject report.
Motion carried 5-0.
3. I-5 WIDENING FROM JAMBOREE ROAD TO NEWPORT AVENUE MILESTONE
SCHEDULE
Mayor Edgar requested interim milestone reports for hose
projects having completion dates of one year or more.
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, stated that a
detailed report would be prepared regarding the Irvine Boulevard
and First Street closures.
It was moved 12v Puckett, seconded by Pontious, to receiv� and
file subject report.
Motion carried 5-0.
CI'T'Y COUNCIL MINU'T'ES
Page 51 9-4-90
XIII. PUBLIC INPUT
1. CITY PAYMENT OF PRESCOTT/KELLY LEGAL FEES
Carl Kasalek and Guido Borges, representatives of T I astin
Residents Action Committee, spoke in opposition to City pa ment
of attorney fees incurred by Councilmember Prescott and f rmer
Councilmember Kelly for the lawsuits initiated against the,City
to block the April, 1990, election (Closed Session Item).
XIV. OTHER BUSINESS
i
1. COMMENDATION FOR PLANNING COMMISSIONER KASPARIAN
Councilmember Potts commended Planning Commissioner Kasparijan on
the following items brought forth during the Planning Commi Sion
meeting: (1) Sign Code from Vancouver, British Columbia (2)
Parkland dedication; and (3) Distribution of Fire S4fety
brochures through the Tustin School District.
2 CLOCK AT EL CAMINO REAL/MAIN STREET
I
Councilmember Prescott reported the light illuminating the dock
at E1 Camino Real and Main Street was burned out.
3. POPULATION OF TUSTIN
Mayor Edgar reported the preliminary population report for the
City of Tustin published by the U.S. Census Bureau was 50,000
which may result in additional State and Federal funding.
i
Council/staff discussion followed regarding probability of $tate
and Federal funding.
i
XV. CLOSED SESSION
i
Mayor Edgar announced the City Council would recess to Closed Seg Sion
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer Witt the
City Attorney regarding pending litigation which had been initiated
formally and to which the City was a party. The title of the
litigation was Earl Prescott and John Kelly v. City of Tustin and
the case number was X61-85-41.
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
At 7:50 p.m., the meeting recessed to the Redevelopment Ag�ncy,
recessed to the above Closed Session, and then adjourned to the! next
Regular Meeting on Monday, September 17, 1990, at 7:00 p.m.
VII. FOLLOWING CLOSED SESSION
At 8:40 p.m., it was moved by Pontious, seconded by Potts, that the
City Council and Earl Prescott have agreed as follows regarding the
litigation entitled Earl Prescott and John Kelly vs. Tustin, et al.
No. X 61-85-41, Orange County Superior Court: (1) Mr. Prescott and
Mr. Kelly will dismiss their pending lawsuit described above with
prejudice; (2) The parties' respective attorneys will agree upO an
arbitrator, a retired judge officed outside of Orange County, 1 with
the arbitration to be conducted in a county bordering Orange Co nty,
to arbitrate in a timely manner the claims of Mr. Prescott an Mr.
Kelly for City payment of their attorneys' fees in the Wynn vs.
Tustin lawsuit and the two Prescott and Kelly vs. Tustin lawsuits and
that the parties agree to be bound by the arbitrator's decision
without resort to the courts or appeals; ( 3 ) Each party shall release
the others from all claims except as decided by the arbitrator as to
the claims of Mr. Prescott and Mr. Kelly to reimbursement of their
attorneys' fees; (4) The parties shall bear the expenses of
arbitration equally, except that Mr. Prescott shall bear and pay for
any additional costs of the arbitration occasioned by virtue of using
an out of county arbitrator and/or conducting the arbitration outside
of Orange County; (5) This agreement shall be set forth in a wry tten
I
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 9-4-90
'i
agreement to be executed by all parties within ten days of September
4, 1990.
i
Motion carried 4-0, Prescott abstained.
a
RICHARD B. EDGAR, MAYOR
i
MARY E. WYNN, CITY CLERK