Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 6 CLAIM #90-31 10-01-90AGEN:'.;. V, DATE: September 19, 1990 CONSTNT CALENDAR NO. 6 Inter - Com TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY ATTORNEY SUBJECT: CLAIMANT: William Blackwell; D/L: 5/28/90; DATE FILED W/CITY: 9/13/90; CLAIM NO: 90-31; CARL WARREN FILE NO: S 636698 CLB After investigation and review it is recommended that the above -referenced claim be rejected and the City Clerk directed to give proper notice of the rejection to the claimant and to the claimant's attorney. Lois E. Jef e Assistant City Attorney JGR:kbg(claim.frm) Enclosure: Copy of Claim September 6, 1990 CELLI @ STRUMPF A LAw CORPORATION 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD PENTHOUSE 2207 LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90010-1675 (213) 380-0921 FAX (213) 380-4258 L19 n� `1 ;� U SEP 1 3 1990 TUSTIN PUBLIC .';i j;rJ l%L;'T. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED City of Tustin Department of Street Maintenence 1472 Service Road Tustin, California 92680 Re: Governmental Claim Pursuant to Government Code Section 910, et seq. Dear City of Tustin, Department of Street Maintenence: Please take notice that this letter shall serve as the Formal Notice of Claim on behalf of William Blackwell. Claimant's Names and Addresses: William Blackwell Where Notices Are To Be Sent Celli & Strumpf, Attorneys at Law 3250 Wilshire Boulevard., Suite 2207 Los Angeles, California 90010 General Description of Injuries William Blackwell suffered injuries, including but not limited to a complete break of the left arm, dislocation of the left elbow, dislocation of the wrist joint, multiple cuts, abrasions and bruises, six surgeries to the left arm. Claimants are unaware of the names of the governmental employees who are responsible for causing the injury. The amount of the claim for each of the claimants is more than $10,000.00 and therefore no dollar amount is stated. Jurisdiction rests in the Superior Court. In William Blackwell Governmental Claim September 6, 1990 Page 2 Basis of Claim Claimants allege that on May 28, 1990 the City of Tustin, Department of Street Maintenence permitted there to be a dangerous condition of public property in that water was allowed to accumulate on the South Bound Interstate 5 at the Redhill exit making impossible to safely negotiate said on ramp in a motor vehicle. Other theories of liability include failure to warn, and defective and dangerous design of the highway. Respectfully submitted, CELLI & STRUMPF A Law Corporation By d-RAIG S. WASSERMAN Attorney for Claimant