HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 7 NPDES PERMIT 10-15-90DATE:
TO:
FROM:
OCTOBER 1, 1990
WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
)NSENT CALENDAR N0. 7
10-15-90
Inter - Com
SUBJECT: NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)
STORMWATER PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT (fILE #1101)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Authorize the Mayor to execute .the joint agreement for implementation of
the National Polllutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit as
approved by the City Attorney.
2. Allocate $16,159.39 for the City's first year percentage share of the
total program costs for the permit and the implementation of the permits
requirements.
BACKGROUND:
On April 16, 1990, the City Council authorized the Mayor to execute the joint
agreement in a form subject to the final approval by the City Attorney. The
permit implementation agreement has now been approved as to form by the City
Attorney.
In July, the Santa Ana and the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control
Boards (RWQCB's) issued a joint NPDES Stormwater permit to the Cities in
Orange County and the County of Orange.
The implementation agreement contains an attachment titled "1990-91
PARTICIPANT SHARE CALCULATIONS". Cost sharing is based on a formula
involving equal weighting of population and area. The City of Tustin's fair
share is $16,159.39 of a total of $1,000,000.00 first year program cost.
A copy of the previous April 10, 1990 staff report is attached for the City
Council's reference.
Bob Leden ecker
Director Public Works/City Engineer
BL: NM: ccg
T � yt�v�
Nestor Mondok
Junior Civil Engineer
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
A
APRIL 10, 1990
WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
e) Inter - Com
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
SUBJECT: NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) FOR
URBAN STORM WATER RUNOFF (FILE #1101)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Authorize the City to be a co -permittee on the application for the
Orange County NPDES permit.
2. Authorize the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to sign the
application and permit on behalf of the City.
3. Authorize the Mayor to execute the joint agreement for Implementa-
tion of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit in a form subject to the final approval by the City Attorney.
BACKGROUND: -
On February 4, 1987, congress passed the Water Quality Act of 1987
amending the 1972 Clean Water Act. Under this act, the Environmental
Protection Agency is required to regulate storm water that discharges
into waters of the United States. Municipalities, counties, and other
government agencies which discharge storm water will be required to
apply for a storm water discharge permit under the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System Program.
The draft regulations issued in December 1988, by the EPA suggest that
the permit program would require municipalities to, among other things,
establish storm 'water management programs consisting of the following
elements:
1. Water Quality Monitoring Program to characterize discharges
and identify source of pollutants.
2. Annual Facility Inspection Program to identify and eliminate
illegal and illicit connections of industrial and sewage
discharges to the drainage facility.
3. Land Use Best Management Practice (BMP) Program to reduce the
sources of non -point pollutants. This would include such
measures as requiring erosion controls on development criteria
for new developments as opposed to water treatment works, a
non-structural rather than a structural approach to the problem.
4. Facility design criteria to reduce the transport of pollutants.
V,
19PDES PROGRAM
APRIL 10, 1990
PAGE 2
5. Hazardous material management programs, including household
hazardous waste and waste oil management programs.
6. Water Pollution Enforcement Program with intent to eliminate
discharges of pollutants to storm drains.
DISCUSSION:
In order to bring about a more organized and efficient approach to this
program, several cities have been meeting with the County (EMA and Flood
Control) to develop a unified program -with the County as lead agency.
The County has the expertise to do much of the needed investigation and
storm water testing through the entire County (they already have a
limited program in place) and is willing to be the lead agency. They
would apply for the permit and the cities would be co -permittees.
City staff believes that the only practical way to move forward with
this neV-program is one in cooperation with the County and other cities.
It is not entirely clear yet what all will be expected of the City. As
a minimum, we think there will be storm drain system inspections needed,
on-site investigations of potential pollutants, and regulatory
enforcement required. The actual extent and cost is not now known.
During the initial permit term our total obligation will be determined.
Additional legislation at the City and State levels may be needed. If
legislation is needed, -a combined effort will be more effective. Also,
a funding source to cover the costs of these mandates will be required.
For the work to be done by the County in support of the cities, a joint
participation agreement is being developed. It is contemplated that the
County and all the Orange County cities would -sign this agreement and
pay their fair share of EMA's costs. Cost sharing would be based on a
formula involving equal weighting of population and area. The Flood
Control District will pay 5% of the cost off the top. A draft of the
agreement is_attached for the City Council's information.
Under normal circumstances, a permit application would be submitted to
the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (the local agency designated
by EPA to regulate the NPDES program) after the final rules have been
issued in July 1990. However, it appears to be a better strategy to
file for a permit ahead of the July date. In doing so, several
advantages are obtained.
1. A 5 -year permit will be issued which will not be subject to the
anticipated stringent rules to be promulgated in July.
WPDES PROGRAM
APRIL 10, 1990
PAGE 3
2. The guidelines of this early permit will be based on the federally -
mandated program, but patterned in a manner more feasible and
acceptable to all Orange County agencies.
3. Implementation time lines will be those developed by the County and
the cities and not those mandated by the July guidelines. This
should allow the implementation period to be extended over a longer
period of time which would benefit all agencies greatly.
4. The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board is advocating this
approach as one which will be easier for them to manage, and one
which will also be acceptable to EPA.
At this time, staff believes the filing of an early permit is necessary
as outlined.above. As the program develops, staff will bring the
appropriate matters back to Council for action.
It is anticipated that these mandated actions will have an impact on
next year's (1990-91) operating budget. Once these impacts have been
identified, staff will either include these needs within the upcoming
budget program preparation or return at a later date with a supplemental
request for budget appropriation.
Bob Ledendecker
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
BL: my
01
V TY O F
RANGE
SEP 2 6 1990
TUSTIN PUBLIC
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY
REGULATION
September 20, 1990
FILE
Dear NPDES Stormwater Co -permittee:
MICHAEL M. RUANE
DIRECTOR, EMA
RONALD J. NOVELLO
DIRECTOR OF REGULATION
LOCATION:
12 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. BOX 4048
SANTA ANA, CA 92702-4048
TELEPHONE:
(714) 834-2626
FAX # 835-7425
Enclosed is a copy of the final version of the NPDES Stormwater Implementation
Agreement. This agreement has been developed in response to the issuance of
stormwater permits by the California Regional Water Quality Control Boards
(San Diego and Santa Ana Regions). The permits, were issued in mid-July 1990
to Orange County and its incorporated cities. The County, acting as lead
agency on the permits, drafted and modified the agreement based on input from
members of the Orange County City Engineers Stormwater Committee.
The agreement outlines the responsibilities of the co -permittees for general
compliance. Interpretation of the exact permit requirements will be performed
by the County. Requests for information for compliance reports will be
submitted by the County to the cities.
This latest version reflects a correction in the dry land area for Laguna
Beach (Attachment 1). The contributions for each co -permittee were modified
slightly as a result of this correction. Note that Attachment 1 now contains
the costs per co -permittee based on the one million dollar, first year budget.
Please have the agreement approved and signed by the appropriate represent-
atives and submit a certified copy of the city's signature page, via
registered mail, to the address below by October 15, 1990.
County of Orange
Environmental Resources Division
10852 Douglass Road
Anaheim, CA 92806
Attn: D. R. Collacott
Please refer questions regarding this letter or the Implementation Agreement
to Bruce Moore or Joe Haug at 567-6363.
Very truly yours,
Ronald J. Novello
Director of Regulation
BM:rps
Enclosures
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement
Santa Ana/San Diego Regions
This AGREEMENT entered into as of this day of
1990 by the County of Orange, (herein called the
COUNTY), the Orange County Flood Control District (herein called
the DISTRICT and the Cities of Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Costa
Mesa, Cypress, Dana Point, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden
Grove, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Laguna Beach, Laguna Niguel, La
Habra, La Palma, Los Alamitos, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach,
Orange, Placentia, San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano, Santa Ana,
Seal Beach, Stanton, Tustin, Villa Park, Westminster, and Yorba
Linda (herein called the CITIES) establishes the responsibilities
of each party with respect to compliance with National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater regulations
administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) under the authority granted by the Clean Water Act (CWA)
and its 1987 amendments, the Water Quality Act (WQA).
RECITALS
Whereas
Congress in 1987 amended Section 402 of the Federal Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. 1342(p)) to require the federal
Environmental Protection Agency to promulgate regulations for
applications for permits for stormwater discharges; and
Whereas
These permit regulations will require the control of
pollutants from stormwater discharges by requiring a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit which would allow
the lawful discharge of stormwaters into waters of the United
States; and
Whereas
These EPA regulations will require NPDES permits for
discharges from municipal storm sewers on a system -wide or
jurisdiction -wide basis; and
Whereas
The Legislature, in enacting the Orange County Flood Control
Act, created the Orange County Flood Control District to provide
for the control of flood and storm waters; and
Whereas
The powers granted to the DISTRICT include carrying on
technical and other investigations, examinations, or tests of all
kinds, making measurements, collecting data, and making analyses,
studies, and inspections pertaining to water supply, control of
floods, use of water, water quality, nuisance, pollution, waste,
and contamination of water, both within and without the DISTRICT;
and
1
Whereas
The CITIES, the COUNTY and the DISTRICT desire to develop
an integrated stormwater discharge management program with the
objective of improving water quality in the County of Orange; and
Whereas
The California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB)
as designee of the EPA has delegated authority to the Regional
Water Quality Control Boards -Santa Ana Region (RWQCB-SAR) and -San
Diego Region (RWQCB-SDR) for administration of the NPDES Storm
Water permit application process within the boundaries of their
Regions; and
Whereas
The COUNTY, DISTRICT and CITIES have been designated as co -
permittees by the RWQCBs; and
Whereas
The COUNTY has been designated as the lead Agency on the
permits; and
Whereas
Cooperation between the CITIES, the COUNTY and the - DISTRICT
to jointly file applications for NPDES Stormwater permits is in
the best interests of the CITIES, the COUNTY and the DISTRICT;
and
Whereas
The COUNTY is willing to share the expertise of its staff
with the CITIES so that they can join in seeking and implementing
certain requirements of the NPDES Stormwater permits; and
NOW THEREFORE: The parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
I. Filing Status. The COUNTY, DISTRICT and CITIES will
file the- applications for stormwater permits as co -
permittees. The COUNTY, the DISTRICT and each
individual city will be a co -permittee.
II. Incorporation of Federal Guidelines. The terms of all
applicable Federal and State guidelines, as presently
written or as changed during the life of this agreement
are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of
this AGREEMENT and take precedence over any
inconsistent terms of this agreement. Inconsistencies
between the terms of the permit and final federal
regulations are not applicable unless mandated by court
order.
III. Delegation of Responsibilities. The responsibilities
of each of the parties shall be as follows:
A. The COUNTY, on a cost -shared basis, shall
administer system compliance by
2
1. Preparing implementation and annual operating
budgets. The budget year shall coincide with
the fiscal year of the COUNTY, July 1 - June
30.
a. Theparticipants shall be permitted to
review and approve the annual operating
budget for the forthcoming year.
Criteria for approval shall be
affirmative responses from a majority of
the co -permittees which represent a
majority of the percentage contribution
as described in Section IV.The COUNTY
and the DISTRICT will represent. one
voting co -permittee with their
percentage contribution equal to the
total of the COUNTY and the DISTRICT as
described in Section IV. The review
period shall be from November 1 to
November 30of each year with approval
of the final budget to be completed by
December 15.
b. The annual operating budget shall not be
exceeded without prior consent of the
majority of the co -permittees which
represent a majority of the percentage
contribution.
2. Preparing compliance reports to the Regional
Board and providing copies to the co -
permittees.
3. Preparing a draft system -wide Best Management
Practices (BMP) Program report.
4. Monitoring the implementation and ensuring
the effectiveness of system -wide BMPs. This
will include field reconnaissance to evaluate
structural and procedural BMPs. An annual
report to the RWQCB will be prepared
presenting the results of these evaluations.
B. The DISTRICT shall, to the maximum extent
practicable and on a cost -shared basis except in
paragraph 4 below,
1. Perform the water quality and hydrographic
monitoring for permit compliance.
2. Administer the water pollution control
program by enforcing the Orange County Water
Pollution Ordinance.
3. Develop uniform criteria for annual
3
inspection of drainage facilities.
4. Perform inspections, at no cost to the
CITIES or the COUNTY, on those facilities
owned by the DISTRICT and on .municipal
separate storm sewers in unincorporated
County. Contracts, for such inspections
within CITIES may be undertaken at the sole
expense of the requesting city.
C. The CITIES shall, to the maximum extent
practicable and at no cost to COUNTY or DISTRICT,
1. Implement a facility inspection program in
accordance with the uniform criteria
developed by the DISTRICT, for all municipal
separate storm sewers as defined by the
stormwater permit and within the
jurisdictional boundaries of that city.
2. Submit to the COUNTY, storm drain maps with
periodic revisions which reflect the
modifications that were made to the storm
drain system.
3. Prepare watershed characterizations,
including:
a. Zoning designations and
b. Identification of areas where hazardous
materials presently are or are suspected
to have been stored, manufactured or
disposed of. This shall include sites
at which a hazardous material spill has
occurred.
4. Review, approve, and implement system -wide
BMPs.
5. Eliminate or have eliminated, illegal/illicit
connections to the storm drain system.
6. Identify the legal authority for control of
discharges to the storm drain system.
7. Provide to the COUNTY annual reports (on
forms provided by the COUNTY) and any other
information needed to satisfy annual
reporting requirements of the RWQCBs.
8. Adopt and enforce, or name DISTRICT as
enforcer of a water pollution control
ordinance, which prohibits non-NPDES
permitted discharges to the municipal
4
separate storm sewer system.
D. The COUNTY shall, to the maximum extent
practicable and at no cost to the CITIES or the
DISTRICT, undertake in the unincorporated areas of
the COUNTY, all activities required above of the
CITIES that are not responsibilities of the
DISTRICT as outlined in Section III. B.
IV. Program Costs. The responsibilities for payment of all
shared costs of equipment, services, contracted
analytical services, and the cost of the Regional
Board permits, shall be distributed among the
DISTRICT, COUNTY and CITIES as follows:
Participant Percentage Contribution
DISTRICT 5
CITIES + COUNTY 95
The individual percentage contributions from each city
and the COUNTY shall be functions of their respective
areas and populations relative to those of the entire
County. Each shall be calculated as one half of the
sum of'the area and population fractions, multiplied by
95. Excluded are national forests, state parks,
airports, landfills, oceans, harbors, tidal bays and
military installations. The contribution of the COUNTY
shall be calculated from unincorporated areas and their
respective populations.
�L + yL
Share in percent for City # 1 = �xtot� �ytot� ( 95
2 )
x = area
y = population
tot = total population or area
95 = total percentage excluding Flood Control
District contribution
The percentage shares shall be calculated by the COUNTY
EMA Environmental Resources Division from population
and area data. These calculations shall be completed by
November 1 of each year and shall be included in the
annual budget proposal. The initial percentage shares
are presented in Attachment 1.
The total of shared costs shall not exceed $1,000,000
for the first year of the program. A deposit which
constitutes a share percentage of the total anticipated
first year costs shall be required of each city. The
5
COUNTY shall send invoices for these deposits to the
CITIES within 15 days of the signing of this AGREEMENT
by the Board of Supervisors. Each city shall pay the
deposit within 45 days of the date of the invoice.
If at any time during a given fiscal year the program
costs exceed the sum of the deposits, the COUNTY shall
submit invoices to the CITIES to recover the deficit.
The share for each city shall be prorated according to
the formula above. Each city shall pay the invoice
within 45 days of the billing date.
The COUNTY shall prepare a fiscal year end accounting
within 60 days of the end of the fiscal year. If the
fiscal year end accounting results in costs (net of
interest earnings) exceeding the sum of the deposits,
the COUNTY shall invoice each city for its prorated
share of the excess cost. Each city shall pay the
billing within .45 days of the date of the invoice. If
the fiscal year end accounting results in the sum of
the deposits exceeding costs (net of interest
earnings), the excess deposits will carry forward to
reduce the billings for the following year.
After the initial billing for the program, the COUNTY
shall invoice each city for its annual deposit at the
beginning (July 1) of each fiscal year. Each city
shall pay the deposit within 45 days of the date of the
invoice. Each city's deposit shall be based on their
prorated share of the approved annual budget, reduced
for any surplus identified in the prior fiscal year end
accounting.
Interest earned on the CITIES deposits will not be paid
to the CITIES, but will be credited against the CITIES
share of the program costs.
Upon termination of the program a final accounting
shall be performed by the COUNTY. If costs (net of
interest earnings) exceed the sum of the deposits, the
COUNTY shall invoice each city for its prorated share
of the excess. Each city shall pay the invoice within
45 days of the date of the invoice. If the sum of the
deposits exceeds the costs, the COUNTY shall reimburse
to each city its prorated share of the excess, within
45 days of the final accounting. Interest earnings are
used to offset the CITIES share of program costs and
will not be refunded to the CITIES.
Each city and the COUNTY shall bear the financial
responsibility for implementing the Program, within its
jurisdictional boundaries, as outlined in Section III.
C. and D.
The filing fees for the Permits shall be included in
the first year costs.
V. Lite of the AGREEMENT. The life of the AGREEMENT shall
be indefinite or as long as the WQA mandates
compliance.
VI. Additional Parties. Any city which becomes signatory
to this AGREEMENT after the applications for the
initial NPDES Stormwater permits have been approved and
any city which becomes incorporated shall become a co -
permittee on the NPDES Stormwater permit issued by its
respective RWQCB and shall comply with all of the
provisions of this AGREEMENT. The date of initiation,
for determining participant costs for newly
incorporated CITIES shall be the date of incorporation,
and for a city signing after NPDES Stormwater permit
approval it shall be the date of the initial
application for the NPDES Stormwater permit. The costs
for adding the additional parties to the program,
including additional permit and processing fees, shall
be paid by the added party. Monies to be reimbursed to
the existing co -permittees shall be credited to their
respective annual program operating fees for the
following budget year.
VII. Withdrawal from the AGREEMENT. A participant may
withdraw from the AGREEMENT 60 days subsequent to
written notice to the COUNTY. The COUNTY will notify
the remaining co -permittees within 10 business days of
receipt of the withdrawal notice. The withdrawing
participant shall agree to file for a separate permit
and to comply with all of the requirements established
by the RWQCB(s). In addition, withdrawal shall
constitute forfeiture of the withdrawing participant's
deposit for the budget year of withdrawal. The
withdrawing participant shall be responsible for all
lawfully assessed penalties as a consequence of
withdrawal. The cost allocations to the remaining
members will be recalculated in the following budget
year.
VIII. Non-compliance with Permit Requirements. Any
participant found in non-compliance with the conditions
of the permit within their jurisdictional
responsibilities shall be solely liable for any
lawfully assessed penalties, pursuant to Section 13385
of the Water Code. Common penalties shall be
calculated according to the formula outlined in Section
IV.
IX. Legal Action/Costs/Attorney Fees. Where any legal
action is necessary to enforce any provision hereof for
damages by reason of an alleged breach of any
provisions of this AGREEMENT, the prevailing party
shall be entitled to receive from the losing party all
7
litigation and collection expenses, administrative
costs, witness fees and court costs.
X. Amendments to the AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT may be
amended by consent of a majority of the co -permittees
which represent a majority of the percentage
contributions as described in Section IV. The COUNTY
and the DISTRICT will represent one voting co -permittee
_ with a percentage contribution equal to the sum of the
_ individual contributions of the COUNTY and DISTRICT as
described in Section IV. No amendment to this
AGREEMENT shall be effective unless it is in writing
and signed by the duly authorized representatives of
the majority of co -permittees.
XI. Authorized Signatories. The County Director of Public
Works and the respective City Engineers or Directors of
Public Works, shall be authorized to execute the
application(s) for NPDES Stormwater permit(s) and take
all other procedural steps necessary to file the
application(s) for NPDES Stormwater permit(s).
XII. Notices. All notices shall be deemed duly given if
delivered by hand; or three (3) days after deposit in
the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid.
XIII. Governing Lay. This AGREEMENT will be governed and
construed in accordance with laws of the State of
California. If any provision or provisions of this
AGREEMENT shall be held to be invalid, illegal or
unenforceable, the validity, legality and
enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in
any way be affected or impaired hereby.
XIV. Consent to Breach not Waiver. No term or provision
hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach excused,,
unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and
signed by the co -permittee to have waived or consented.
Any consent by any co -permittee to, or waiver of, a
breach by the other, whether express or implied, shall
not constitute a consent to, waiver of, or excuse for
any other different or subsequent breach.
XV. Applicability of Prior Agreements. This document
constitutes the entire AGREEMENT between the co -
permittees with respect to the subject matter; all
prior agreements, representations, statements,
negotiations and undertakings are superseded hereby.
XVI. Execution of the AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT may be
executed in counterpart and the signed counterparts
shall constitute a single instrument.
:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this AGREEMENT has been executed as of
the day and year first above written.
ATTEST:
Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors
COUNTY OF ORANGE
By
Chairperson, Board of Supervisors
ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
By
Chairperson, Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ADRIAN KUYPER, COUNTY COUNSEL
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORINIA
Deputy Date
9
PAGES 10 thru 34 ARE SIGNATURE
PAGES FOR OTHER ORANGE COUNTY
CITIES
ATTEST:
City Clerk
A P�OVED S /r'AM
J
�4
1 J �� G�
aty Attorney',/ /. ` �; ;
C.
35
City of Tustin
By
Mayor
ATTACHMENT 1
1990-91 PARTICIPANT SHARE CALCULATIONS
r
WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD
ANAHEIM
BREA
BUENA PARK
COSTA MESA
CYPRESS
DANA POINT
FOUNTAIN VALLEY
FULLERTON
GARDEN GROVE
HUNTINGTON BEACH
IRVINE
LAGUNA BEACH
LAGUNA NIGUEL
LA HABRA
LA PALMA
LOS ALAMITOS
MISSION VIEJO
NEWPORT BEACH
ORANGE
PLACENTIA
SAN CLEMENTE
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
SANTA ANA
SEAL BEACH
STANTON
TUSTIN
VILLA PARK
WESTMINSTER
YORBA LINDA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
ATTACHMENT 1
WEIGHTINGS: POPULATION 50%
AREA 50%
NUMBERS MAY NOT FOOT DUE TO ROUNDING
* Source: California State Department of Finance
** Source: Environmental Management Agency - Surveyor/Boundary Unit
Area has been calculated using the dry land area figures
provided by EMA and subtracting areas in each jurisdiction for
national forests, state parks, airports, landfills and military
installations.
7-31-90
WEIGHTED
PER
1-1-90
**AREA
AVERAGE
510000,000
*POPULATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% OF POP.
(sq. miles)
% OF AREA
SHARE
BUDGETED
247,822
10.65%
44.99
6.70%
8.243428%
582,434.28
33,815
1.45%
10.36
1.54%
1.423452%
$14,234.52
66,608
2.86%
10.06
1.50%
2.071843%
520,718.43
94,706
4.07%
15.34
2.28%
3.019148%
$30,191.48
45,703
1.96%
6.93
1.03%
1.423527%
$14,235.27
31,189
1.34%
6.04
0.90%
1.064192%
$10,641.92
56,382
2.42%
9.55
1.42%
1.826951%
$18,269.51
111,737
4.80%
22.19
3.31%
3.851549%
$38,515.49
135,286
5.82%
17.77
2.65%
4.019693%
$40,196.93
191,630
8.24%
26.80
3.99%
5.809078%
$58,090.78
102,418
4.40%
43.40
6.46%
5.161863%
$51,618.63
24,599
1.06%
7.50
1.12%
1.032922%
$10,329.22
37,527
1.61%
14.70
2.19%
1.806304%
518,063.04
49,398
2.12%
7.70
1.15%
1.553455%
515,534.55
16,120
0.69%
2.01
0.30%
0.471369%
$48713.69
12,206
0.52%
2.19
0.33%
0.404182%
54,041.82
75,537
3.25%
16.39
2.44%
2.702015%
$27,020.15
70,202
3.02%
13.72
2.04%
2.404175%
$24,041.75
107,712
4.63%
23.18
3.45%
3.839402%
$38,394.02
42,060
1.81%
6.61
0.98%
1.326499%
$13,264.99
40,381
1.74%
16.91
2.52%
2.020938%
$20,209.38
25,268
1.09%
14.05
2.09%
1.509994%
$15,099.94
235,961
10.14%
27.34
4.07%
6.752498%
$67,524.98
27,347
1.18%
8.55
1.27%
1.163322%
511,633.22
28,427
1.22%
3.13
0.47%
0.801911%
58,019.11
49,409
2.12%
8.58
1.28%
1.615939%
$16,159.39
6,959
0.30%
2.08
0.31%
0.289259%
52,892.59
73,403
3.16%
10.19
1.52%
2.219791%
$22,197.91
52,367
2.25%
17.96
2.68%
2.339973%
$23,399.73
234,032
10.06%
255.16
38.01%
22.831329%
$228,313.29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.000000%
$50,000.00
2,326,211
100.00%
671.38
100.00%
100.000000%
$1,000,000.00
NUMBERS MAY NOT FOOT DUE TO ROUNDING
* Source: California State Department of Finance
** Source: Environmental Management Agency - Surveyor/Boundary Unit
Area has been calculated using the dry land area figures
provided by EMA and subtracting areas in each jurisdiction for
national forests, state parks, airports, landfills and military
installations.
GROSS DRY LAND AREA FIGURES SUPPLIED BY EMA SURVEYOR/BOUNDARY UNIT:
ANAHEIM
44.99
LOS ALAMITOS
BREA
10.36
MISSION VIEJO
BUENA PARK
10.06
NEWPORT BEACH
COSTA MESA
15.34
ORANGE
CYPRESS
6.93
PLACENTIA
DANA POINT
6.44
SAN CLEMENTE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY
9.55
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
FULLERTON
22.30
SANTA ANA
GARDEN GROVE
17.77
SEAL BEACH
HUNTINGTON BEACH
27.27
STANTON
IRVINE
43.40
TUSTIN
LAGUNA BEACH
7.50
VILLA PARK
LAGUNA NIGUEL
14.70
WESTMINSTER
LA HABRA
7.70
YORBA LINDA
LA PALMA
2.01
COUNTY OF ORANGE
4.26
16.39
13.77
23.18
6.61
17.09
14.05
27.34
10.72
3.13
10.98
2.08
10.19
17.96
364.80
LAND AREA DEDUCTED FROM JURISDICTIONS:
Landf ills:
Airports:
Area
:(Sq. Miles) Jurisdiction
Fullerton .11 Fullerton
John Wayne .78 County
Military Facilities:
Area
(Sq. Miles) Jurisdiction
------------ ---------
Marine Corps Air Station 2.40 Tustin
E1 Toro Marine Base 6.25 County
Los Alamitos Armed 2.07 Los Alamitos
Services Reserve Center
Seal Beach Weapons Station 2.17 Seal Beach
National Forests:
Area
(Sq. Miles) Jurisdiction
------------ ---------
Cleveland National Forest 86.75 County
Area
(Sq. Miles)
------------
Jurisdiction
Olinda
.89
---------
County
Santiago
.25
County
Prima Deschecha
2.34
County
Bee Canyon
1.13
County
Coyote Canyon
1.09
County
State Parks:
Area
(Sq. Miles)
-------------
Jurisdiction
Alamitos St. Beach
.002
---------
Seal Beach
Bolsa Chica St. Beach
.27
Huntington Beach
Chino Hills St. Park
4.09
County
Corona Del Mar St. Beach
.05
Newport Beach
Crystal Cove St. Park
6.30
County
St. Beach
.40
Dana Point
_Doheny
Tuntington St. Beach
.20
Huntington Beach
an Clemente St. Beach
.18
San Clemente
Airports:
Area
:(Sq. Miles) Jurisdiction
Fullerton .11 Fullerton
John Wayne .78 County
Military Facilities:
Area
(Sq. Miles) Jurisdiction
------------ ---------
Marine Corps Air Station 2.40 Tustin
E1 Toro Marine Base 6.25 County
Los Alamitos Armed 2.07 Los Alamitos
Services Reserve Center
Seal Beach Weapons Station 2.17 Seal Beach
National Forests:
Area
(Sq. Miles) Jurisdiction
------------ ---------
Cleveland National Forest 86.75 County