HomeMy WebLinkAboutOB 1 ASBESTOS REMOVE 12-17-90DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
0-1
DECEMBER 17, 199
WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
') BUSINESS N0. 1
-17-90
Inter - Com
ASBESTOS REMOVAL COSTS - 1011 EL CAMINO REAL (FORMER CITY
HALL BUILDING)
RECOMMENDATION
Pleasure of the City Council.
BACKGROUND
At the City Council meeting on December 3, 1990, Frank Grienke
requested that the City of Tustin compensate him in an amount not
to exceed $1, 000 for the removal of asbestos in the former portable
Tustin City Hall building he purchased from the City of Tustin now
located at 1011 E1 Camino Real. At the December 3, 1990 City
Council meeting and in the attached letter to Mr. William A. Huston
dated November 28, 1990, Mr. Grienke states that it is his belief
that asbestos was installed in the former City Hall at the City's
direction and therefore the City is responsible for its removal and
handling including "originator responsibilities" (upon disposing of
the asbestos).
The City Council continued their discussion on this matter to
permit staff and the City Attorney's office to provide additional
background information to the Council on the original sale of,the
building and the City's legal responsibilities.
DISCUSSION
A review of City records indicates that the old City Hall building
previously located on Second Street was sold to Mr. Grienke on
November 15f 1978. The sale was made pursuant to an order of the
City Council made on September 18, 1978 (Resolution 78-96) and was
subject to specific terms and conditions as follows:
° Sale price of $36,101.00
° Subject to approval by the City of Tustin to install the
building at 1011 Laguna Road (El Camino Real)
° Obligation of buyer to remove at his sole cost and
expense the subject building from its previous location.
Staff can find no record or work orders that the City installed the
floor tiles and mastic nor that we altered the area that housed the
City Council Report
Asbestos Removal Costs
December 17, 1990
Page 2
- 1011 El Camino Real
telephone equipment that are those areas in the current building
where asbestos is present.
In response to complaints from the City Council (meeting November
7, 1988) and continuous complaints from the public and members of
the Planning Commission about the property located at 1001 and 1011
E1 Camino Real, a number of letters have been sent over the last
two years (November 1988, May 1990, July 13, 1990 and August 16,
1990) to Southern Counties dealing with the following issues on the
property:
Crushed rock and miscellaneous debris on site.
Service station and/or other buildings on the site
unsightly and in need of demolition.
Existing Karl's sign deteriorated, unsightly and should
be removed.
Mr. Grienke has been responsive to removal of weeds and debris from
the property as requested by staff on a regular basis. Demolition
permits for removal of all structures on -the site were obtained
over the counter from the Community Development Department on
November 27, 1990. The issue of the presence of asbestos in the
old City Hall building and the City's responsibilities in this
matter were not raised by Mr. Grienke until his letter of November
28, 1990.
The City Attorney has independently reviewed the City's legal
obligations in this matter and his specific analysis and
recommendations are attached to this report.
Christine Shingleton
Director of Communi Development
CAS:kf/ElCam.cas
attachment
Community Development Department
November 28, 1990
City of Tustin
Mr. William Huston, City Manager
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
Dear Bill:
In 1978 1 purchased the portable Tustin City Hall buildings from the City of Tustin and
relocated them at 1011 Ei Clzirnino Real in Tustin.
When we went to pick up permits to demolish the buildings we learned that among
other things was that we needed an asbestos inspection.
We ordered this done at a cost of $ 575.00. Asbestos was located in a small area
(approx. 6' by 8') that housed the telephone equipment.
It was found in the bottom layer of the floor tiles and the mastic which attached the
- tiles. The asbestos present was identified as Chrysotile 1-5% and Chrysotile 12%.
It is our belief that because this was installed in these buildings at the City's direction
the City of Tustin is responsible for its removal and proper handling.
There is considerable law regarding pollution clean up as it relates to the originators
responsibilities.
It is my strong belief that should legal action be required we would prevail. I did not
generate this asbestos and as such will fight from being listed as an E.P.A. Hazardous
v; �t /,^y�^_^+^" Th:4- .�_.1r►.I��^+�, �C p� s- -liv owned by m;� wife Margaret and I.
ti ao �e AGI IGI Q lVl . 1 t IBJ Ne V4� l y Iv ;
It will be a simple and relatively easy matter for the City of Tustin to correct this
problem that they created. Its cost is far less than the legal expenses we both will
incur.
Should you or your staff want to observe the area please let me know and we will
make arrangements for their entry.
November 28, 1990
Mr. William Huston
Page -2-
Bill, I want to clear up this site as soon as possible, as we are getting much pressure
from Tustin's Community Development Department to demolish the buildings.
Please discuss this issue with City Attorney Jim Rourke as soon as possible so that
we may get an answer as to the City of Tustin's position.
Thank you very much for your prompt reply.
Sincerely,
Frank H. Greinke
1825 W. Collins Avenue
Orange, CA 92667
714/744-7140
attachments
�bic''aec.�thl
ter' n �+ t•.f ^
AISEiEIsT0S DE �' �,T110N. lt.�..
r a►. •
�. �i.%r• r j:..nan C:• Ca�,r. F'tIVC .. �:;..1/.• .. %:;: (!air: ��`(lvE- �.!• � �t7�:� � 1 1 �i 7 �,•ir.. r c}::' ,
1 V11 %�1 '\ irrIJ I!:/ Real
a a7 .r i .J . .
Tj F-.. i. n V . Boy, 4159
JJ.
C• r_ .Z:• �r \.• ice. 1 1 �- \J_ ►. �. _i �- _._ �1 �y
's, iL, F,, :', ✓.`_�\Tlr•� i!," iJl !!.�.. ._.)iLl)?�\�:
i� •t
�c_rm ii,T:lte: Dui + uing survey. Sec c�:.aC�`lP:� : er7T = a^.:J C.J lC_
L:..r.--:ve:. `e: 14 —
••.. .• i•-r...lil T� t,iri OWNE if" �r c• li ir-i•t !rrt, r!'• -^...i• (1! ��:°i.`F: �:�� l:*erc 1f�i_'tnt' P?.. �i.!'r it 11 �. ri1urces ct frianitr
._ ,�:i'iift•. \J �5:,�.L 1,. h; fi � � �1... 5' t OfC� t f? n . .E' t .. _
Q� Zc'.:C; r ii%lji f1::i� i1r .�Ifil rt`F,v :'�' L>`fE Ci:.CltpF+r?is 1 hE< iE%r7C��'i C+r s.l:F rci.'.�r. C�' r.ncctU� product- i sutle•C•2 tC: a4r:: i re-ulat.ion }
J
n C fI SnO (r'. L'. ..t �" Q!lt\'ry1'!t:.:�`tS£:�. cJs+c:n: �f.^ r.n s.r: nn :!•�.
2��'..cl� '`cn 7�:3 _ G fi�.lOr:I1E.. _ _. rt ,_ . C_ :'fc .^.;: 9.^, 2t:i!T.i^f! TO L.'iG e:rCS£.St^:E
`''.2!_.3f- ; .�.' _'4 t'it3F^•ri�r .� It! fi
i,ii� 1'��)7f` C�CCUj3Frii£ F!1� C�iN't?c mac. ch_.Llr f�� _rr S�•t_.: mi;ry ncrrt,:.-_t:le proc'u t• Iricludi - .-.ome' tiC'
ci: t"aa.f�:lc :lil �: iaaG l�itQ ij. bi4: ii i-: iiip ►Q is C�.. Gi��i:. ll: X:'ril':, ,�� /fi\i1 fl r�ii• l i iiiLl IQtI CJ i�! have lr C'i7it
►r.r:^:; & C...._...._-,._.r7c SSi3e_.;os Pri;,-t✓ DRy fer:. c:..t.. E IN n C' c-,' uiFtf:>ft Ol r1oZuCt.>. .ti E• 8s5v..i.QE
c`ri4ant {JF • s •r��c 4 rr t cfe sn ur �--' t r �.
. tr,e..e n� c. � ops _ c ! be ce.ermific
- t� ; ^ rtiL� ... !'1 f'.,, �.c raG' `': .:C" �.:
�c.. i1 '(` ♦: �'� .ice �.•.
h- ��♦ - /f.r. ^., �� `+r...r Ct7.v. ; 1 _rl . T iC� .t. !^� tr 1. [`^•.,'� fel r.L.. - •r f -
'.:i�: _. .. _ _ .. _ .J :� ..._ .. ..:y.l '_:J ...• .. IG:. .. .... - . r. . I.. .••.. •N, �. .. . .. GSC . �v:;i C'_ :i. � , �U�l. \l:Ji\ C�7Ca'•j�:..
O'.: -n! 7, tnr-�`t �r�, rr.
..:i. ,i .c.. i:_ -i. .. , C:1t� �:✓: \.'.. i.Cii' ....ift'v vu 1_. t fes• ;i:�....L. .. ri ?:(;i t}�{. i.iil!(.
i-i�'r+•. ... .. ._.. _. ..._ � � .. .iGr ,. ��%�J.-•G .3:. .:. _:c_.. _ _ �_ .. E: -r .?G'; ... _ �t'. �. .. i'. �: �J. ..,. ", C•G.�'_ _ '1 :.. _fir.. C: �. _. CCS..
. - _ :r. c-. .u' i� irr•.l. :ter. �•c. •i• 1' :r. _ rte• r..- =f.-. r.[ �- _'�.-�-_ r ,: ;. __
.-- - ..." l- •.. -' '.J ... : _ _ ••"l!� .. ter'"��..."..� _ _.- .. a-. � .'t. ... .., ... .. . ilk"'� �.. .. �If (.a li:'f . "1:. ;.i: :':, t-- f'f'•..
•_ _ �. • . is .. _ ` • �' _ . _ , ... ,....
(' r i .- t 7 .. - `` _ .--t •.• / i V ~ - r C• _' e!,-. J•✓ O'..f
_-$25 QC) - 532—='--
• � �-�-- - .. . t. ' i �:.. , .: r � �' _ _
l� t — _-.--_-____.'___ _. ._ Y.:. ��r.-_�-•1 `.( In __._-._.__.�...-_.._�_
_0Oct-
-•i:
ASHES :; D --L- ;-PCT10t4. 1NC'.
��G�c �7z?t:�f•r: '.�r:)YC` �'a 1:f:•.. �tl1TC �
l7i•ifJf'.�. L;'L!:'1:. i,ir. Dc.Ltti
r. T U} • s-
I
ASBESTOS DETECTION, INC.
12862 Garden Grove Blvd., Suite 220
Garden Grove, CA 92643
(714) 530-1922
DEMOLITION PROTOCOL Former City Hall
I_ Client: Southern Counties Oil
P.O. Box 4159
Orange, CA 92613
II. Project address: 1011 E1 Camino Real
Tustin, CA
III. Date of Survey: November 19, 1990
IV. Inspector: Michael Ay, E.P.A. building inspector #318, U.S.C.
V. Structure: The structure is the former city hall. It is a
wood -frame, one-story building with multi -office interior areas.
VI. Systems/products surveyed:
A. Acoustical ceiling material: None observed.
B. Textured wall surfacing: None observed.
C_ pipe/boiler insulation: None observed.
D. Attic insulation: Assumed fiberglass insulation was observed
above the ceiling tiles.
E. HVAC duct system insulation: Two exterior forced air units
were observed with no suspect materials observed.
F. Ceiling tiles: One pattern of ceiling tiles existed
throughout the building:
Sample I Location Asbestos present
g W side front office None
G. Sprayed structural fireproofing: None observed.
H. Flooring: Linoleum and vinyl tiles were observed in various
areas of the building. Samples of distinctive patterns were obtained
as follows:
Sample f Location Asbestos present
5 W side office (brown) None
6 S end phone rm. (bottom layer) Chrysotile 1-5o
6A Mastic on sample 6 Chrysotile 120
7 Send phone rm. ( surface layer) None
I. Exterior Stucco: Stucco was observed on the structure. A
sample was obtainEu as follows:
Sample f Location Asbestos present
13 W side exterior None
-1-
. • BULK ASBESTOS ANAL�'"' S
RV (40 CF. R. Part 763, Subpart F, ndix & pages 293.299)
ASBESTOS DETECTION, INC. Client Name Southern Counties Oil
12862 Garden Grove Blvd., Suite 220
Garden Grove, CA 92643 Client Address P.O. Box 4159
(714) 530-1922 Orange, CA 92613
NAD - NO ASBESTOS DETECTED
Estimated percentages by 'area.
Detection Limit: 1% asbestos
This report pertains to samples investigated and does not necessarily apply to other apparently
identical or similar materials
This report is not to be reproduced without the express permission of Asbestos Detection Co., Inc
Sample No. 11S1588-4 ADI Lab. No. 6584
Type of Materia: Vinyl tile Color. Brown
Type(s) of asbestos present
1. NAD Percentage_
2. Percentage
Other fibrous material present None
Other norrfibrous material present Granular minerals; vinyl resins
Analyst's comment, if applicable: Ash.
Sample Na 11S1588-5 ADI Lab. No. 6585
Type of Material Vinyl tile Color. Brown
Type(s) of asbestos present:
1. NAD Percentage:
2. Percentage
Other fibrous material present None
Other non-fibrous material present Granular minerals; vinyl resins
Analyst's comment, if applicable Ash.
�. � �� � !� .� �� � �r r � � .r � Ate. it. ►�� � � �f/ �� � � � �� �� � � �! �� �t �� � � i �\ r� � �� r� �!
Sample No. 11S1588-6 ADI Lab. Na 6586
Type of 1,4ateria:. Vinyl tile Color. Tan/brown
Type(s) of asbestos present
1. Chrysotile Percentage: 1-5%
2. Percentage
Other fibroin material present . None
0 -.her non-fibrous material present Granular minerals-, vinyl resins
AnalvsL s comment, if applicable Ash.
1
11-21-90 R. FrauenbergerL
Date Analyst Approved By
ASBESTOS DETECTION, INC.
12862 Garden Grove Blvd., Suite 220
Garden Grove, CA 92643
(714) 530-1922
BULK ASBESTOS ANALYSIS
(40 CF. R, Part 763, Subpart F, �ndix A pages 293-299)
Client Name Southern Counties oil
Client Address P.O. Box 4159
Orange, CA 92613
NAD - NO ASBESTOS DETECTED
Estimated percentages by 'area.
Detection Limit 1% asbestos
This report pertains to samples investigated and does not necessarily apply to other apparently
identical or similar materials.
This report is not to be reproduced without the express permission of Asbestos Detection Co., Inc
.rr �� �..r �.,.� iA �� �� �� ter.. �� r �. m.A• r� �r �� �� �� r+� .�� .�� w �� �� �� �� rr� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� .rte r �� �. �� .r.
Sample No. 1151588-6A ADI Lab. No. 6586A
Type of Materia': Mastic on sample 6 Color. Black
Type(s) o` asbestos present
1. Chrysotile Percentage: 12%
2, Percentage:
Other fibrous material present Cellulose 1-2%
Other non-fibrous material present Resins
Analyst's comment, if applicable N/A
err Sam � J r � w r 0-0 w mum 0-0 r—a
Sample No. 11S1588-7 ADI Lab. No. 6587
Type of Material: Vinyl tile Color. Brown
Type(s) of asbestos present
1- NAD Percentage:
2. Percentage
Other fibrous material present Cellulose less than 10
Other non-fibrous material present Granular minerals; vinyl resins
AnaIyst's comment, if applicable N/A
owm 0o o yam r =MW � � M-0 r M. � rro mm" amm" =� ww� OMM
Sample No. 11S1588-8 ADI Lab. No. 6588
Type of Material: Joint compound Color. Off—white
Type(s) of asbestos present
1- NAD Percentage:
2. Percentage.
Other fibrous material present . Cellulose 10%
Other non-fibrous material present Granular minerals
Analyst's comment, if applicable Subsamples analyzed separately and, combined for reporting.
..e ..s ....: s.r ..o. wa _ _ ....s .rwc a.ec as.cs ra.w .�ca .w r .,........� .,.......r ..,. w w� �e .....� v w ....� �� �� �.a:.rte■ �•� �� �i s� some 4�
11-21-90 R. Frauenberger
v'�
�-
Date Analyst Approed y
Ti E C— 1 1 — 'D 0 T 1_1 E 1 C, F: �_� 1_I �: F E l.1 i_i i_1 _I R 11 F F
DECEMBER 11, 1990
PATE:
mw RECEIVEC) --
DEC A 1 �o
1TY my"tvrw"•....
x�er -- Com
CHRISTINE SHINGLETON, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO:
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM:
SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL COMPANY; OLD CITY HALL BUILDING
SUBJECT:
After having looked into this matter, it is our conclusion
that the City does not have liability to Southern Counties Oil
Company nor to Mr, and Mrs. Greinke for any claim that there is
asbestos floor tile in the building that was purchased by them from
the City a number of years ago. We realize that Mr. Greinke, who
has had extensive experience in hazardous waste situations,
believes the City does in fact have liability in this matter.
Mr. Greinke has stated that he is willing to have the matter
resolved by the city undertaking the responsibility of dealing with
the appropriate environmental authorities in its own name in order
to obtain necessary permits and approvals to have the floor the
properly disposed of and for the City to pay up to $x.,000 for the
cost involved in so doing. This would not seem like an
unreasonable resolution in the matter, provided that the City's
liability and responsibility in the matter is limited to just the
foregoing.
if the City Council is inclined to resolve this natter so as
to avoid any further problems, liability, legal action, etc., we
would recommend that it do so only upon a very precise agreement
being entered into with Mr. and Mrs. Greinke which would expressly
limit the responsibilities of the City to those two obligations
proposed by Mr. Greinke. For that purpose, we submit for the
Council's consideration a draft of such a proposed agreement.
rj4- 0
J M G . ROU'RKE
City Attorney
JGR/kbg:R:12/11/90(A1777.ks)
cc: WH
Post -It"' brand fax transmittal memo 7071
of pages 10
To
From
Co.
Co.
Dept.,
9�
Fax #
Fax 0
Ti E C_ - 1 1 - •_+ 0 T I_I E 1 2=- 1 F' C1 I_I R F=:: E LJ ID 1D D F.' I_I.)= F
This AgreeMent is made
Greinke and Margaret Greinke
as "Greinke") and the City
(hereinafter referred to a
day of
AGREEMENT
P _ C1
and entered into by and between Frank
(hereinafter referred to collectively
of Tustin, a municipal corporation
s "City") to be effective as of the
1990.
A. 2n approximately 1978 City sold to Greinke a certain
factory constructed, modular structure that had served as an off ice
building as part of the City Mall complex for the approximate sum
of $ (this building is referred to hereinafter as the
"Building"). From the time the Building was acquired by Greinke
until sometime in 1989, the Building was used by Southern Counties
Oil Company, a corporation in which Greinke is the ;Major
shareholder and Frank Greinke is President, and was located at
Newport Avenue and El. Camino Peal in the City of Tustin as a
headquarters office for Southern Counties Oil Company. Southern
Counties Oil. Company has now sold the property at Newport Avenue
dnd E1 Camino Real with the property in escrow subject to 'various
conditions including removal of all the improvements from the
property. Greinke has now advised City that while in the process
of obtaining permits for the removal and demolition of the Building
it has been determined, according to Greinke, that there is sore
floor the in an six by eight foot area of the Building which
contains asbestos and in order for the Building to be removed and
demolished, permits must be obtained from several. environmental
authorities with jurisdiction over such matters and then removed
and demolished in accordance with the terms, conditions, and
approvals prescribed by such permits. Greinke has advised City
that it is his opinion that City is the party responsible for the
floor tile being in the Building and is the party legally required
asbestos to obtain the necessary permits and pay for the removal
and proper and legal disposal of the asbestos floor tile. Greinke
has advised City that if it does not undertake the responsibilities
hereinafter set forth in this Agreement that Greinke would sue the
City, City and Greinke would each incur substantial, legal expense
and Greinke is certain that he would prevail in such litigation.
City, in order to resolve and settle the matter and buy its peace
and without admitting the truth, accuracy or correctness of any of
the foregoing, has agreed to the following:
in consideration of the mutual promises and agreerents
specified hereinafter, the parties hereby promise and agree as
follows:
1. City will apply for permits necessary to permit the legal
and proper removal and demolition of the floor the alleged to
contain asbestos and contained in a room of approximately six feet
by eight feet in the Building.
T+ E i_ - 1 1 - '_, Cl T 1_1 E 1 1 F- C_1 I_I F' F::- E ::: LJ C_1 0 D R I_I F F
F' _ 0 Y
2. upon obtaining the required permits, City will cause the
said floor the alleged to contain asbestos to be removed and
demolished in accordance with, the terms, conditions and approvals
contained in such permit.
3. City will pay for the cost of removal and demolition of
the said floor the in a legal manner, provided, however, anything
and everything to the contrary above notwithstanding, the complete
obligation and duty of City shall be limited to the filing and
processing of applications for the permits described above and the
removal and demolition, of the floor tile alleged to contain
asbestos at a cost and expense to City not to exceed One Thousand
Dollars ($i, 000.00) , including any and all permit fees, application
fees, costs, and all other expense, costs, charges and fees of
every other kind and nature whatsoever.
4. Greinke hereby agrees to save, defend, indemnify and hold
City harmless from any and all costs, expense, liability, claims,
demands and responsibilities of every kind and nature whatsoever
in excess of the obligations expressly and -specifically agreed to
by City as set forth hereinabove, including, any and all claims and
demands made by any and all environmental authorities and shall
fully protect City from any obligations, duties, claims and
demands, responsibilities in excess of (a) City filing for the
permits described above and (b) City removing or causing to be
removed the floor the alleged to contain asbestos, both at a total
cost to City not in excess of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00).
CITY OF TUSTIN, a municipal
corporation
BY:
Mayor
BY:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
FRANK GREINKE and MARGARET
GREINKE
BY:
Frank Greinke
BY:
Margaret Greinke
On , 19 , before me, the undersigned,
a Notary public in and for said State, personally appeared:
;and
known to ne to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to
me that he/she executed the same.
Witness my hand and official seal.