HomeMy WebLinkAboutPH 3 G.P. AMEND 89-02c 06-19-89Ar ~~~lr~ ~ ,..,...~ ~ PUBLIC HEARING
I =ltl%Il i#1 ~ NO. 3
~ ~1 ~ ~~ ~/, ;/'~ ~ 6-19-89
DATE: 4U~E 19; 1989 ~ ........... I
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
HO. MOP, ABLE IMYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CoILqUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
·
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02 (C), ZONE CHANGE 88-02 AND FAST
TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88-01
APPLICANT-
THE IRVINE COMPANY
550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE, BOX I
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 926S8-8904
GENERAL
LOCATION:
SECTORS 7 AND 11 OF THE FAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN
ENV I RONMENTAL
STATUS'.
AN ADDENDUM TO EIR 85-2 HAS BEEN PREPARED
REQUEST-.
RECOMMENDATION
A CHANGE IN THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION, ZONING PLAN
MAP DESIGNATION AND FAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION OF
CERTAIN PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IN SECTORS 7 AND 11 OF THE
EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN. CERTAIN TEXTUAL CHANGES TO THE EAST
TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN ARE ALSO PROPOSED TO IMPLEMENT THE REQUESTED
LANO USE OESIGNATION CHANGES~N THE SPECIFIC PLAN
It is recommended that the City Council'
1. Approve Addendum 89-01 to the East Tustln Specific Plan EIR-85-2 and
recertify Final EIR'8542 and all subsequently adopted Supplements and
Addendums by adoption of .Resolution No. 89-87.
2. Approve General Plan-Amendment 89-02(c) by the adoption of Resolution No.
89-88.
3. M.O. that Ordinance i024: for Zone Change 88-02 have first reading by title
only; and
M.O. that Ordinance 1024: for Zone Change 88-02 be introduced.
June 19, 1989
GPA 89-02 (C), ZC 88-02
ETSP Amendment 88-01
Page two
4. H.O. that Ordinance i026 for East Tustln Specific Plan Amendment 88-01 have
first reading by title onlyl and
M.O. that Ordinance 1026 for East Tustin Specific Plan 88-01 be introduced.
BACKGROUND .
The Planning Commission at a regular meeting on June 12, 1989 recommended to th~
City Council adoption of General Plan Amendment 89-02(c), Zone Change 88-02 and
East Tustin.Spec!fic Plan Amendment 88-01. The intent of these entitlement
changes is to .implement the School Facilities Agreement between the Irvine
Company and the Tustin Unified School District dated March, 1988 and a Letter of
Understand~g.bel~n the Irvine'Company and the City. of Tustin, dated March 11,
1988 and ~qXbseqUern'c~y-amended on April 3, 1989.
·
The Letter of Understanding with the City requires the Community Park originally
proposed on Lot 7 in Tract 12763 of Sector .11 of. the East Tustin'Specific Plan
to be relocated north 'of I~vine Boulevard within Tract 12870 and Sector 7. The
Park's relocation is to accommodate the expansion of the original high school
proposed in Sector 11 to a 40 acre site.
The portion of the project site locate~t-.in Sector 7 is northwest.of the
intersection of Ir_vine Boulevard and Jambo. r. ee Road. The portion of ~e projec.t
site within~-Sec, t'em~-11, is bounded by Irvine Boulevard on the north, Myford Road
on the east, Heri_tage Way on the south and Tustin Ranch Road on the west. Each
of the proposed p~oject components is discussed below'
1. General Pilan-Amendment 89-0.21,(C) - The existing General Plan Land Use
Designation" ~.~th~in the project site and proposed General Plan Land Use
revisions ar6~-~repicted in Exhibits 4 and 5 of the attached Addendum to
Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 85-2. The proposed-General Plan
AmenJment wou'~-d" revise General Plan land use configurations as follows'
..Changq th~e.~easterly 10 acre portion of the former high school site
located at;Irvine Boulevard and New Myford Road 'in Sector 11 of the
East Tustin~ Specific Plan from High School (HS) to Planned Community
Residential~ (PCR);
Change the designation of the. former 16 acre Community Park site
located at Irvine Boulevard and Tustin Ranch Road in Sector 11 of the
East Tustin Specific Plan from Community Park (CP) to High School
(HS);
° Change. the designation' of a former 20 acre residential'site located in
Community Development Department
Ctty Council Report
June '19, 1989
GPA 89-02(C), ZC 88-02, &
ETSP Amendment 88-01
Page' three
Sector 7 of the East Tustl'n Specific Plan adjacent t'o Jamboree' Road
north of future Keller Drive from Planned Community Residential (PCR)
to Community Park (CP). --
2. Zone Chan~e 88-02 - the existing Zoning Plan Map designation within the
projecl~ sit~ and the proposed Zoning Plan Map revisions are shown in
Exhibits 6 and 7 of the attached Addendum to Final EIR 85-2. The specific
Zone Change requested would revise the Zoning Plan Map as follows:
Change the easterly 10 acre portion of property currently classified
as Planned Community - Community Facility (PC-CF) located at Irvine
Boulevard and New Myford Road in Sector 11 of the East Tustin Specific
Plan to Planned Community Residential (PCR);
Change the designation .of a 20 acre site currently classified as
Planned Community Residential (PCR) located adjacent to -Jamboree Road
and north of future Keller Drive in the East Tusti'n Specific Plan to
Planned Community - Community Facility (PC-CF).
Since a Zoning Map must be consistent with a City's General Plan as
required by Stare'law, the proposed Amendments will establish consistency
between proposed General Plan land~-s~e changes and the City's ZOning
Ordinance.
.
Specific Plan Amendment - Proposed Specific Plan Amendments are map
amendments to the Specific Plan Land Use Plan and narrative amendments
which implement and establish textual consistency in the Plan with the map
amendments. The existing Specific Plan land uses and proposed Specific
land uses for Sectors 7 and 11 are depicted in Exhibits 2 and 3 of the
attached Addendum to Final EIR 85-2. Narrative amendments are provided in
Appendix A of the Addendum. Language to be removed from the plan is
cross-hatched and new language is bolded' and underlined. Proposed
specific Land Use Amend~nents can be summarized as follows:
Change the,easterly 10 acre portion of the former high school site
located at Irvine Boulevard and New Myford Road in Sector 11 of the
East Tustin Specific Plan from a High School (HS) designation to a
Medium High Density (MH) designation;
Change the 16 acre Community Park (CP) designation in Sector 11 to the
High School (HS) designation:
Change the designation of a former 20 acre site loca'ted adjacent to
Jamboree Road north of future Keller Drive 'in Sector 7 from Medium
High Residential (MH) to Community Park (CP).
Community Development Department
cttY Counct1 Report
June 19, 1989
GPA 89-02(C), ZC 88-02, &
ETSP Amendment 88-01
Page .four '
Once the above Speclftc Plan Amendments are approved the new "approved"
land use Hap w111 be used as a base for a revised repr.lnt of the East
Tustln Specific Plan and all maps in the Spectfic Plan by' the applicant.
These maps are ~not assigned a page number In the text, so they will be
listed by section number and Exhlbtt letter as follows:
SECTION # EXHIBIT TITLE
2 D
Circulation Plan
2 F
Drainage & Flood Control Concept Plan
2 G
Sewer Concept Plan
2 '' H
Water Concept Plan
2 I
L~ndscaPe Concept Plan
4. Addendum 89-01 to EIR 85-2 as Previously Amended- The initial General
Plan, zone Chafig'~I 'and ~pe6~fic Plan Aj_rendmentS necessary to adopt the East
Tustin Specific Plan were considered in EIR 85-2 certified on March 12,
1986 and the subsequently adopted supplements and addendums.
EIR 85-2 includ~ed a project description, identification of environmental
impacts and project mitigation measures. The California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) authorizes the preparation of an Addendum to an EIR when
only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to make the EIR
under consideration adequate under CEQA.
An Environmental Assessment has been prepared for the project as an
addendum to Final EIR 85-2, as previously modified. No new significant
environmental issues other than those raised in EIR 85-2 have been raised
by the proposed project. ·
A copy of Addendum 89-1 is attached.
CONCLUSION
ii
The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Specific Plan Amendment
have been reviewed for conformance with the California Environmental Quality
Community Development Department
·
City Councl] Report
'June 19, 1989
GPA 89-02(.C), ZC 88-02, &
ETSP Amndment, 88-01
· gage five
Act, State Subdivision Map Act, State Development and Planning Law, the T~sttn
Area General Plan and the Tustin City Code. The proposed amendments will
implement terms of a Letter Agreement between the applicant and the City of
Tustin and also the adopted School Facilities Agreement between the applicant
and the Tustin Unified School District. Addendum 89-01 with recertification of
EIR 85-2 is considered adequate under CEQA. Staff recommends approval of the
attached'resolutions approving the subject project request.
Christine S~ngleton ~e
Director of Community velopment
CAS'ts
Attachments:
Planning. Commission Resolution No's. 2629, 2630, 2631 and 2632
Addendum 89-1
Resolution No. 89-87 .. ·
Resolution No. 89-88
Ordinance No. 1024
Ordinance No. 1026
Community. Development Department
PLANNING COrdPITSSION RESOLUTIONS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2629
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
RECERTIFY FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIR 85-2
FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN AND ADDENDUM NO.
89-01 FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-02 (C), ZONE
CHANGE 88-02 AND EAST TUSTIN-SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
88-01 AND FIND THAT THE FINAL EIR, AND ALL SUBSEQUENT
ADDENDUMS AND SUPPLEMENTS ARE ADEQUATE FOR THE PROJECT
AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN
INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That an initial study questionnaire was prepared for General
Plan Amendment 88-02 {C), Zone Change 88-02 and E~st Tustin
Specific Plan Amendment 88-01 (the "Project"), and it was
determined that Environmental Impact Report (EIR)' 85-2 (East
Tustin Specific Plan including all certified supplemental and ,
addendum documents), with an Addendum (No. 89-01), could, be
employed to describe this project, in accordance with California
Environmental Quality-Act (CEQA).
B. That the environmental documentation was prepared by City of
Tustin and Michael Brand~han Associates.
C. That the City provided public notice of its initial study and
its intention to prepare an Addendum for the project. EIR 85-2
(including all. certified supplemental and addendum ~documents)
and Addendum No. 89-01, including comments, have bee'n reviewed
and considered by the City of Tustin.
D. That EIR 85-2 (including all certified supplemental and addendum
documents) and Addendum 89-01 was prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act, and CEQA Guidelines,
and the policies of the City of Tustin.
E. That pursuant to CEQA, EIR 85-2 (including all certified
Supplemental and addendum documents) has previously been
prepared and certified and adequately addresses the general
environmental setting of the project, its significant
environmental impacts, and the alternatives and mitigation
measures related to each significant environmental effect, and
that no additional environmental impacts or mitigation measures
were identified in Addendum 89-01.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IG
17
19
2O
2i
23
24
25
'26
27
28
Resolution No. 2629
Page two
F. That Addendum 89-01 prepared for the project addresses only
minor tecl~ntcal changes or additions and none of the conditions
described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines have occurred.
Ge
All tmpacts, mtttatlon measures and project alternatives
identified In the previously certified envlronmenta] documents
identified in Sectton I A. of this Resolution have been reviewed
and considered, mitigation measures have been Incorporated into
the proposed project, as applicable, that eliminate or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as
Identified In each of the previously certified documents and it
ts determined that any remaining significant effects on the
environment found to be unavoidable have been balanced against
the benefits of the Project and against the Project alternatives
and those beneflts have been found to be overriding on each
significant impact Identified in the previously considered
environmental documents. Findings and a Statement of Facts
supporting such ftndtngs and mitigation measures are 11steal tn
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 86-28 and Exhtbtt A of Resolution
No. 87-76 and are incorporated heretn by reference.
II. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council
certify that EIR 85-2 for t~e. East Tusttn Specific Plan (including
all certified supplemental and addendum documents) and Addendum 89-01
are adequate to serve as the'~roject EIR and that such documents have
been completed in compliance with State CEQA law and Guidelines.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a re(~Llar meeting of' the Planning Commission heldd on
the /~~ day of~. , 1989. /Q ~
A. L. Ba
~.~ ~~.~ Chairman
l~ni Foley
Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, PENNI FOLEY, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording
Secretary of .the Pla,n[pi, ng Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that
Resolution No. ~~;~ was duly passed and. adopted at a ~ular meeting of
the Tj~stin Plann~ing Co~mmiSsion, held on the ~v~ day of(~ _ . . ,
PENNI FOLEY
Recording Secretary
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2630
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
'OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE
CITY COUNCIL. OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02(c), A
REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
DESIGNATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTOR 7
AND 11 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT AREA.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tusttn does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows'
A. Government Code Section 65358 provides that when it is deemed to
be in the public interest, the legislative body may amend a part
of the General Plan.
B. That a proper application has been filed by the Irvine Company
for the purpose of reclassifying the General Plan Land Use
designation of property generally located in Sector 7 and 11 of
the East Tusttn Specific Project Plan area. The portion of the
project located in Sector 7 is northwest of the intersection of
Irvine Boulevard and Jamboree Road. The portion Of the project
with Sector 11 is bounded by Irvine Boulevard qn the north,
Myford Road on the east, Heritage Way on the south and Tusttn
Ranch Road on' the we~_
Ce
Government Code Se¢~ton 65358(b) states that no mandatory
element of a General Plan shall be amended more frequently than
four times per calendar year. However, each amendment ma~f
include more than one change. Appropriately in conjunction with
General Plan Amendment 89-02(c), four other Amendments are being
considered which shall be considered one Amendment per
Government Code Section 65358{b).
D. That a public hearing before the Planning Commission to consider
General Plan Amendment 89-02{c) was duly called, noticed, and
held on June 12, 1989.
E. This General Plan Amendment has been reviewed in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act and an Addendum to EIR
85-02 has been prepared.
F. The propo, sed amendments are in the best interest of the public
and surrounding properties in that the proposed amendments are
consistent with terms of a Letter of Understanding between the
City of Tustin and Irvine Company dated March 11, 1988 and
amended April 3, 1989 and will guarantee designation of an
adequate high school site and community park sites to serve the
communi ry.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2630
Page two
G. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with other
elements of the General Plan.
II. The Planntng Commission hereby, recommends to the City Counctl
approval of General Plan Amendment 89-02(c) as shown on Exhlbtt A and
more specifically described as follows:
A. Change the easterly [0 acre-'portton of the former high school
stte located at [rvtne Boulevard and New Myford Rdad In Sector
[! of the East Tusttn Specific Plan from Hlgh School (HS) to
Planned Community Residential (PCR);
Be
Change the designation of the former 16 acre community park stte
located at Irvtne Boulevard and Tustln Ranch Road In Sector 1!
of the East Tusttn Specific Plan from Community .Park (CP) to
High School (HS); and
C. Change the designation of a former 20 acre residential site
located In Sector 7 of the East Tusttn Speclftc Plan adjacent to
Jamboree Road north of future Keller Drlve from Planned
Community Residential (PCR) to Community Park (CP).
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regul~jne, etlng of the Tustln Plannln~ Commission,
eqeld on the//~r:~J4C day of (.~]X~.~.~_ 1989.
Penni Foley
Secretary
, ',~
J ~' ~ '.~
·
~ ,~ .****'".*.o ,.**.. *.
'" ' '." '~..' '~,..:i.
, -. '" · ~ 'i ~ .,"~...
j ,. ~.. · ,d, d* * *
:...':)':. '."...'
· ~ ,:.!; .:
~' . .-"~a ' . in,., _..~.,
~ . . '.~, &. ~ . ~ e~
...... '..,7 · '." ._"
.... '.';...'.~.[.':~., :. ~.~..-.¥
· 'q' ""°. ~ "d,q.. '.* - . .Ir *... ~"* '* ·
:..~.--:,-... ~.;.~;. .-. ,.
-. ,. :~.-..' ,,.~. ~.:. :,, .
~.: ;z,~. .,~}.. ~' .:.:.;.....~ ..
· .' ...:.[..,. ,,f :.-.-.;;.'/ .t
..i: * ' · ' ..
.l, ..d
..,-' ~*', i:" "" "'""
· . ·
·: ..'; *.:o'.a,.',
. .
· . . .
~.& ~'l .''*~.o ," !' *.'*' ..
.**' ,~,.,.,_:* *.' · ,~ .,.$,..,*. ._;~.*.*~,*...
'l . ..~;¶.~.*.~ ~***....* ...'1 *,,..*:
,~: .*..- 1,1 ;,* .j k. **.,' ....~.:..; ..
..... .- ,~. ~-.'.. .-...*.
: ~. .. "~
... . ~ .."~ ·- .
· .
..... :;. ;.~ "?. ·
· ~ ~.1 ' .
--'i : '.'.:
· .'.. ',~.'..-' ·
· ,:..~._,.,.,.~-
/;; ' ·.,
.~ '~"
.:. ooo.. · ·
i,,'. ...... .-= ..
, * .....,....~ ~, ~o ,.*o;.... .. ,.
i,~.~..... !~, .I
.**~*'4 .';.*.-*'.**d~*~ ; :*: ', .',**'~
· ,~.
-
· ./¥- ~. :%'::
EXHIB, .~
RESOLUTXOM
,
.NO, 2630 ......
·
·
·
L.~.__,~ ~ COMVlUNITY RESIDENTIAL
~fT'ERMEDIATE ~
REGIONAL PARK
·" REO:IEATION
PeR
REVISED
LAND USE DIAGRAM
.......
I Ill · I I "l Il I
Tustin Area General Plan
EDAW
- REVISED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF 'ORANGE
CITY OF TUSTIN
I, PENNI FOLEY, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording
Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that
Resolution No. ~/~0 was duly passed andadopted at a r~ular meeting of
the,T~stin Planning Commission, held on the y/~//'-dayof ~ ....
.
198 ,~/.-
Recording Secretary .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2631
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE
CITY COUNCIL OF ZONE CHANGE 88-02, A REQUEST TO
REZONE CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTORS 7 AND 11
OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT AREA
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and' determines as follows:
A. That a proper application has been filed by the Irvine Company
for the purpose of reclassifying the Zoning Plan Map-designation
of property generally located in Sectors 7 and 11 of the East
Tustin Specific Plan project area. The portion of the project
located in Sector 7 is northwest of the intersection of Irvine
Boulevard and Jamboree Road. The portion of the project within
· Sector 11 is bounded by Irvine Boulevard to the north Myford
Road on the east, Heritage Way on the south and Tustin Ranch
Road on the west.
·
B. That a public hearing before the Planning Commission to consider
Zone Change 88-02 was duly called, noticed, and held on-June 12,
1989.
C. This Zone Change ha.s been reviewed in accordanc~ with the
California Environmental Quality Act and an Addendum to EIR
85-02 has been prepared.
D. The proposed rezoning is necessary to establish consistency with
the General Plan as required by law.
E. The proposed zoning is in the best interest of the public
health, safety, and welfare and would be compatible with the.
existing and surrounding uses.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval to the City
Council of Zone Change 88-02 as shown on 'Exhibit A and more
specifically described as follows:
Ae
Change the easterly 10 acre portion of property currently
classified as Planned Community - Community Facility (PC-FC)
located at Irvine Boulevard and New Myford Road in Sector 11 of
the East Tustin Specific Plan to Planned Community Residential
(PCR); and
B. .Change the designation of a 20 acre site currently classified as
Planned Community Residential (PCR) located adjacent to Jamboree
Road and north of future Keller Drive in the East Tustin
Specific Plan to Planned Community - Community Facility (PC-CF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
lS
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2631
Page two
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetlng of the Tustln P]annlng Commission,
held on the ~/~ day of ~ , 1989.
enni Foley L ~"
I Secretary '
..~~L~. a~C h a trma n - '
:/'.
'..
~"l.'~ .e, · :
; ' ,
· 'o ~.
· ~ · · . .
..~.,. ·. ·.
.4'-4 , ~,
......[.,~ [~.,: ·
' .o . .i ,.- · .
,il..,.. ~e ~ ~ .,.. .. - ..
. ..'.':.. ~. ~,-~. , ;'~
', ,4 ..."~, · ,/ :...,'-,~'+,
, · ~ '~d~ ~ - ~. ~. ''.'
· ''.. & w... .~ '.. '.V.
..' , .. ':~'~. 1,~ .~
; .'~.d. '.- ' ' ' ' .~ ." "..
· ~....~.,~ ..
.'. ~ · . · ...~ ~,
-.. .,~ .. ~ -......' ~
~.'~ ,,' .. ~ · '.~,:. '.~.'~-.
~..~..: ~...'.. ,.. .'~ ....~
~ . · . . .
~'.~.." = .... .,...~:. '..~;.
~.~ ~-i' ':,, ,.. .~,~ ...'.".~...'
..: .'. .' h~:,".~ ~'".~'.". '.~ ' "
. .. · .~....... ..· .. · ..
~ ~ .'~.: .... '~......*' .; ... ..;~.
'".:::~./:.'.., ~ . ~ ...~
.%' ,~, ;...' .. · ~.,~ ~ ~.~
~'~..~':~..: ..~..... .~ ....
..','
,~.. '..~
PCR
PCR
PCR
PCR
AVl'.
PCldu
EXHIB]:T A
RESOLUTZON NO. 2631
.
·
·
LEGEND
l .c.l
· ~ R../u~ co~,~~ c~c~
~'~ PLA~ COMMUNITY
CO~UNI~ ~ACIUTIES
PCCF .:
·
...
· ·
·
I
I
REVISED
ZONING MAP
Inc.,
R~EVISED
STATE OF CALIIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF TUSTIN
I, PENNI FOLEY, the undersigned, hereby certi'fy that I am the RecOrding
Secretary of the_Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that
Resolution No. ~~/' was duly passed and adopted at a~ meetin£j of
the,I~stin Planning C6mmtssion, held on the y/~' day of
198~.
Recor. ding Secretary
·
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1!
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2632
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ~F THE CITY
OF TUSTIN,.CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE
CITY COUNCIL OF EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
88-01, PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN LAND
USE PLAN FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IN SECTOR 7
AND 11 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN AND NARRATIVE
TEXTURAL AMENDMENTS TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
·
I. The .Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A®
Section 3.14 of the East Tustln Specific Plan provides that
amendments to the East Tustin Specific Plan shall be initiated
and processed in the same manner set forth by the City Code for
amending the City Zoning Ordinance.
B. That a proper application has been filed by the Irvine Company
for the purpose of making certain Specific Plan Land Use Plan
amendments on certain property generally located in Sector 7 and
11 of the East Tustln Specific Plan. The portion of the project
site located in Sector 7 is northwest of the tnl~ersection of
Irvtne Boulevard and Jamboree Road. The porti, on of the project
site within Sector 11 is bounded by Irvine Boulevard on the
north, Myford Road on the east, Heritage Way on the south and
Tustin Ranch Road on t~ west. In addition to proposed Land Use
Plan amendments, narrative amendments are al so proposed to
establish textual consistency in the Plan with the proposed map
amendments.
C. A public, hearing before the Planning Commission was duly
noticed, called and held on June 12, 1989.
D. The. East Tusttn Specific Plan has been reviewed in accordance
with the California Environmental Quality Act' and Addendum 89-01
to East Tustin Specific Plan EIR 85-02 has been prepared.
E. The proposed East Tusttn Specific Plan Amendments is in the best
interest of the public heal th, safety, and welfare and would be
compatible with the existing and surrounding uses.
F. The proposed East Tusttn Specific Plan Amendments will establish
consistency with General Plan Amendment 89-02(c) and Zone Change
88-02.
II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval to the City
Council of East Tustin Specific Plan Amendment 88-01. Textual
amendments are shown on Exhibit A and map amendments are shown on
1
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
1-3
14
15
17
1,~
19
~0
21
23
24
25
27
28
Resolution No.-2632
Page two
Exhibit B and can be more specifically described as follows:
Ae
Be
Change to easterly 10 acre portion of the former high school
site located at Irvine Boulevard and New Myford Road in Sector
11 of the East Tustin Specific Plan from a High School (HS)
designation to a Medium High Density {MH) designation;
Change ~he 16 acre Community Park (CP) designation in Sector
to the High School (HS) designation; and
Ce
Change the designation of a former 20 acre site located adjacent
to Jamboree Road north of future Keller Drive in Sector 7 from
Medium High Residential (MH) to Community Park (CP).
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regul~.r meeting of the.Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the ~/JT~ day of ~ , 1989
EXHIBIT A
TO
RESOLUT[O# #0. 2632
TEXT MODIFICATIO#S
Table 2.1 ·
Statistical Summary
Land Use Designation
Acreaqe
Residential
Estate ([up to 2 du/ac)
Low (up to 5 du/ac)
Medlum Low (up to 10 du/ac)
Medlum (up to 18 du/ac)
Medium-High (up to 25 du/ac)
415
287
5O
222
188
Open Space
Public Neighborhood Parks*
Community Parks
Golf Course
7~741
150
Commerc I al/Bus 1 ness
Neighborhood Commerci al
General CommerCial
Mi xed Use
10
31
121
Institutional
Elementary Schools*
Intermediate Schools
High School
58
15
40
Other Uses
Roads {arterial and major on!y**}
101 '
* Certain park )nd school site acr~a-ges have not been
established. Such acreage wi.l-1 be taken from
residential land use area.
** Acreage for all roads other than arterial and major
roads, has been included in the acreage for the
surrounding land uses.
Residential Land Use: The Land use Plan designates five residential categories,
each of which has maxlmum denslty. Residential densities are controlled In all
of the following: land use areas, sectors and the Specific Plan Area.
For any residential subdivision map the maximum density range cannot be exceeded
for a particular land use area. Lower densities will be permitted in any area.
The boundaries and acreage of the land use areas shown on the Land Use Plan are
approximate and will be precisely determined in the future when subdivision Maps
are reviewed.
The land use areas described within each sector are subject to the policies
specific to a given sector. These policies are outlined in Section 2.14.
2-2
The total number of dwelling units, for the overall Specific Plan Area may not
exceed 7,250 units. However, if the total allowable units in Tentative Tract
Map No. 12345 are not constructed, the unbuilt units may be transferred to. the
Specific Plan Area. in accordance with the provisions of the following
paragraphs.
The total number of dwelling units in each Sector may not exceed the figures
specified Table 2.4. If a sector is developed with less than the maximum number
of units permitted within the sector, then a transfer of units will. be permitted
from sector to sector within the Specific Plan Area. These transfers will be
closely monitored. When proposing unit transfers, compatibility with adajacent
land use areas must be considered. Specific requirements for allowing unit
transfers and maximum unit increases in Sectors are outlined in the Development
Standards in Section 3.0. Also, in Section 3.0 there are more definitive
standards for development of each residential density category.
Mixed Use Designation: The Land Use Plan designates 121 acres in the southeast'
corner of the site, in Sector 12 between Bryan Avenue and the 1-5 Freeway, as a
mixed use area. A 70-acre commercial center and hotel/n~tel will be developed
in this area. Additional commercial uses or office and research and development
uses may also be developed within this area. The Mixed Use designation permits
flexibility for location and configuration of these uses. It also creates the
opportunity for development to respond to future changes in economic and market
forces. The Development Standards for the Mixed Use Area are defined in Section
3.0.
Non-Residential Land Uses: The Land use Plan (LUP) includes a number of non-
residential uses' such as: (1) Schools', (2} Parks, (3) Open Space and Recreation
Facilities, and {4) Commercial 'Land Use designations. These are summarized in
the fol 1 owl ng table: '
·
Table~2-',_
Land Uses Integral to the LuP
Institutional Use
Intermediate School
High School
Community Park
Golf Course
Commercial/Business Use
General Commerci al
Neighborhood Commerci al
Quantity
Approximate
Total Acreage
15
40
)7 41
150
31
10
2-3
Table 2.3
Land Uses Anticipated in LUP
Institutional Use
Elementary School
Public Neighborhood Parks
Private Neighborhood Parks
qua.nti, l~y
3-6
~3"
Varl es *
Approximate
Total Acreage
8-10
3-4 *
Vari es *
* The exact number, location and size of private
neighborhood parks will be established with Subdi-
vision maps.
One high school site is reserved along Irvine Boulevard and one junior high
school site is designated for the area along Peters Canyon Wash in Sector 2.
Five elementary school .sites are to be distributed throughout the Specific Plan
area, and one elementary school has been sited with an adjacent neighborhood
park, which encompasses the redwood/cedar stand situated on Sector 3. Four
other neighborhood parks are generally located in various sectors of the Plan.
Three.($) community parks are more specifically located; they include an eight-
acre site near the junior high school, a Ii~ 20-acre site, and a 13-acre site
incorporating a knoll situated south of Portola Parkway.
Elementary and. Intermediate schools and public neighborhood parks are
symbolically illustrated on the Land Use Plan. The specific sizes, location and-
numbers of these' facilities will be determined in accordance with the provision
of Subsection 2.8. -
2.2 Circulation
· .
The Circulation Plan, Exhibit D, illustrates the backbone vehicular circulation
system for the Specific Plan area. This section describes the existing and
planned arterial highway circulation system for the East Tustin Specific Plan.
Established Arterial Highway Ali~lnments
Street
City of Tustin
Classification
Irvine Boulevard
Bryan Avenue
Portol a Parkway
Santa Ana Freeway
Browning Avenue
Future Road
Myford Road
Weir Canyon Road
County of Orange
Classification
Major Major
Primary Primary
- Major*
Freeway Freeway
Secondary Secondary
Major* Major or Primary*
Major* _
Eastern Transportation Corridor -
E1 Camino Real Secondary
Primary
Freeway*
* Conceptual ly Proposed
2-4
Table 2.4
East Tustin.Statistical Analysis
SECTOR 1
. .
Subtotal
Acreage
'125
125
* Total
Max I mum A11 owab 1 e
Land Use Density Units
i
Estate Density Residential 2.0 du/ac
i
m
188
SECTOR 2
im
Subtota 1
SECTOR 3
Subtotal
SECTOR 4
Subtotal
SECTOR 5
Subtotal
SECTOR 6
Subtotal
74
101
.'
50
13
o 10 **
15 **
8 **
271
6
08**
03**
17
118
~18
·
98
18
116
31
31
Estate Density Resident(al 2 du/ac
Low Density Residential $ du/ac
Medium Low Density Residential 10 du/ac
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
E1 ementary School
Junior High School
Community Park
Low Density Residential
E1 ementary School
Neighborhood Park
5 du/ac
Estate Density Residential
2 du/ac
Estate Density Residential 2 du/ac
Low Density Residential 5 du/ac
General Commercial
1,010 +
68 +
177
219
SECTOR 7
111
132
10 **
I) $$ **
150
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Medium High Density Residential 25 du/ac
Elementary School
Community Park
Golf Course
Subtotal
SECTOR 8
Subtotal
436
77
26
o 10 **
0 4 **
117
Low Density ReSidential
Medium Density Residential
E1 ementary School
Neighborhood Park
4 du/ac
18 du/ac
3,605 +
349
233
2-24 582 _+
SECTOR 9
Acreage
Table 2.4 (Cont'd)
* Total
Max I mum A11 owab 1 e
Land Use Density Units
i i i
39 Low Density Residential 5 du/ac
i
Subtotal 3g 156
SECTOR 10
Subtotal
46 Low Density Residential 5 du/ac
15 Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
o 10 ** Elementary School
i i
71 405 +
SECTOR
Subtota 1
SECTOR
Subtotal
57
~ 56
40
0 10 **
o 4 **
·
10
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Medium High Density Residential 25 du/ac
High School
Elementary School
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Con~nercial
i ii ii i
177 1,540 +
121 Mixed Use .-
121 7, gSO ***
Total allowablq number of permitted~its' within a given sector may be
increased if a sector unit transfer.occurs as described in Subsection
2.1.
** The precise acreage and locations of private and public neighborhood
parks, elementary schools and intermediate schools will be determined as
part of the review of the Sector Subdivision Maps as identified under
Review Procedure Subsection 1.5 and consistent with policies established
in Subsections 2.9 and 2.10 of the Specific Plan.
-*** If the maximum allowable units in Tentative Tract Map No. 12345 are not
constructed, the unconstructed units may be transferred to the Specific
Plan area.'
This acreage figure is an estimated allocation for this land use. If it
changes, other land use acreage allocations in the sector may change.
However, the total allowable units for the sector will remain the same.
Total Allowable Units assumes that if a school and/or a park currently
designated for this sector are not built in this sector and that the
acreage goes into residential use. If these facilities are constructed,
the land use area density limitation may preclude construction of the
total allowable sector units and such unbuilt units would be transferred
to another sector.
2-25
Sector 7
o
This is the largest of the 12 sectors in
terms of acreage. The site is virtually
flat and encompasses 436 acres. It is
situated along the eastern boundary of the
site and is bounded by Portola Parkway on
the north, Myford Road on the east, the
Future Road on the west, and Trvlne
.Boulevard on the south.
The stte includes a hlllslde knoll located
south of P0rtola Parkway, a visually
prominent landform feature which contrasts
with the flat topography within the rest
of the Sector. Eucalyptus windrows occur
along Peters Canyon Wash and in the
easterly portion of the Sector.
This area is planned to encompass a
variety of residential densities to be
developed around an 18-hole privately
owned and operated golf course which is to
be open for public pl ay.
Residential uses including medium and
medium high densities are planned for this
Sector. Densities general ly decrease from
east to west with the medium-high areas
located along Myford Road.
Also planned for ~thls area is an el~-m-entary school which has not been
precisely located at this time, however; it is currently allocated for the
southwest quadrant of this sector. The precise location and size of this
school shall be determined as per Subsection 2.10 of this Specific Plan. A
regional riding/hiking trail, and bikeway are planned in accordance with
County Master Plans {Class I}. The trail may be located away from Peters
Canyon Wash in order to avoid conflicts with the golf course. The trail
location in Sector 7 shown on the Land Use Plan {Exhibit C) following along
arterial highways is conceptual and may be adjusted to meet specific site
conditions and to ensure trail continuation in the adjoining City of Irvine.
A neighborhood park has also been generally allocated for this same
quadrant. The size and location of this park will be precisely determined
as per Subsection 2.8. Finally, a 13-acre community park has been .precisely
located to encompass the knoll at the northern most end of the sector. Aa
additional 20 acre conmzunit), park will be provided near the southeast comer oft~re sector.
The following policies apply to Sector 7:
A. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted within this sector are as
shown in Table 2.4.
B. The golf course as shown on the Land Use Plan illustrates a conceptual
boundary. The precise edges of the golf course may vary as long as the
2-37
area of the oth'er residential land uses remain generally consistent with
the Statistical Summary and that the relative location of residential
land use are consistent with Exhibit C.
There may be an adjustment of increased acreage from the minimum acreage
of 150 to the golf course from that-shown on the statistical summary.
Any adjustment,, however, shall be at the discretion of the landowner,
and can encroach On the residential land use parcels within this sector.
Such an adjustment would change acreages within those land use parcels,
however, the total maximum number of units allowed within the sector
will not be exceeded.
The golf course provides a strong visual image within the sector as well
as the whole community and visibility shall be provided from the
arterial roadways, therefore the golf course shall directly front on
Myford Road, 'and Irvine Boulevard, and shal'l have at least two frontages
on the Future Road. A minimum of 250-feet of lineal frontage shall be
provided at each of these points.
Incorporation of existing eucalyptus windrows shall be considered within
the golf course.
C. In addition to the specific submittal requirements for the Subdivision
Map of this sector, reefer to Section 1.5, a conceptual landscape plan
for arterial roadways adjoining this Sector shall also be submitted with
the Subdivision Map' for approval by the Director of Community
Development, refer to Section 2.12 Implementation for specific
requl rment s. '
D. A community park shall be located along the edge south of Portola
Parkway and shall include the north side of the knoll located south of
this road. Development policies re'i~ted to this knoll are established
in Section 2.13, Hillside District'Guidelines, Landform Modification.
~ln additional 20 acre Commu~tity Park shall be provided ad/acent to Jamboree Road and
north of lrvine Boulevard.
E. Where feasible and consistent with flood control requirements, the
treatment of Peters Canyon Wash {Exhibit L) should retain a natural
appearance by {1} minimizing concrete channelization such as vertical
walls and concrete channel or trapezoidal soil cement; (2} retaining or
replanting indigenous vegetation along the drainage course, and/or
{3} locating the drainage course within open space areas.
2-38
Sector 11
This sector consists of approximately
183 acres. It is bounded by the Future
Road alignment on the west, Irvine
Boulevard on the north, Myford. Road on the
east, and Bryan Avenue on the south.
Several land uses are proposed within this
sector. The residential uses include
medium density which is to be located in
the southwest quadrant of the sector.
Medium high residential development is to
be situated along the eastern boundary of
the site encompassing the entire area
between Bryan Avenue and Irvine Boulevard.
A 40-acre site has been designated for a
high school just south of Irvine
.Boulevard. This will be centrally located
to both Myford and the Future Road
extension.
northeast corner of the sector, a lO-acre
. neighborhood commercial slte has been
planned at the Intersection of Irvine
Boulevard and Myford Road, an important
entry point lnto the City from the east.
An elementary school has been generally
located between the medium and medium high
residential development. The preclse sf~z-es and locatlon of schools shall be
determined as described in Subsection-2.10 of this Speciflc Plan. A
neighborhood park has been generally located in the area of the medium
residential development. The preclse locatlon of this park is to be
determined as described in Subsection 2.8 of this Specific Plan.
The following policies apply to Sector 11:
A. The maximum number of residential units permitted in this sector are as
shown on Table 2.4.
B. In addition to the specific submittal requirements for the Subdivision
Map of this Sector, refer to Section 1.5, a conceptual landscape plan
for arterial roadways within this Sector shall also be submitted with
the Subdivision Map for approval by the Director of Community
Development, refer to Section 2.12 Implementation for specific
requirements.
2-43
_C1). A buffer for the E1 Modena channel 'shall be provided. The methods for
buffering shall include, but not be limited to fencing and landscaping.
2-44
F_~ eT TUSTIN STATISTICAL ANALY~
SECTOR 1
Subtotal
Acreage
1.25
125
Maximum
Land Use Density
Estate Density Residential 2.0 du/ac
* Total
A11 owab 1 e
Units
i i
i i i
188 - ·
SECTOR 2
Subtotal
SECTOR 3
Subtotal
SECTOR 4
ii
Subtotal
SECTOR
Subtotal
SECTOR 6
i
Subtotal
74
101
5O
13
0 10 **
15 **
8 **
271
6
08**
03**
17
118
118
98
18
116
31
31
Estate Density Residential 2 du/ac
Low Density Residential 5 du/ac
Medium Low Density Residential 10 du/ac
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Elementary School
Junior High School
Co..nuni ty Park
Low Density Residential
E1 ementary School
Neighborhood Park
i i i
5 du/ac
Estate Density Residential
2 du/ac
Estate Density R6sidential
Low Density Residential
2 du/ac
5 du/ac
General Con~nercl al
1,010 +
68 +
177
219
SECTOR 7
Subtotal
SECTOR 8
I211 ~1
132
o 10 **
I) $$ **
150
ii
436
77
26
o 10 **
o 4 **
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Medium High Density Residefitial 25 du/ac
E1 ementary School
Community Park
Golf Course
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
E1 ementary School.
Neighborhood Park
4 du/ac
18 du/ac
3,605 +
349
233
Subtotal
117
582 +
3-13 -
· , EAST TUSTIN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (C~nt'd)
SECTOR 9
Acreage
39
..
Subtotal 39
Maximum
Land Use Density
Low Density Residential
* Total
Allowable
Units
5 du/ac.
156
SECTOR 10
Subtotal
SECTOR
46
15
o 10 **
71
57
~ 56
40
o 10 **
o 4 **
10
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Elementary School
i
5 du/ac
18 du/ac
ii
405 +
Subtotal IB;) 177
SECTOR 12
121
m,
Subtotal 121
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Medium High Density Residential 25 du/ac
High School
Elementary School
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Commercial
1,540 +
Mi xed Use
7,950 *~'*
Total allowable number of permltted'~lts within a given sector may be
increased if a sector unit transfer.occurs as described in Subsection
2.1.
** The precise acreage and locations of private and publiC' neighborhood
parks, elementary schools and .intermediate schools will be determined as
part of the review of the Sector Subdivision Maps as identified under
Review Procedure Subsection 1.5 and consistent with policies established
in Subsections 2.g and 2.10 of the Specific Plan.
*** If the maximum allowable units in Tentative Tract Map No. 12345 are not
constructed, the unconstructed units may be transferred to the Specific
'Plan area.
This acreage figure is an estimated allocation for this land use. If it
changes, other land use acreage allocations in the sector may change.
However, the total allowable units for the sector will remain the same.
Total Allowable Units assumes that if a school and/or a park currently
designated for this sector are not built in this sector and that the
acreage goes into residential use. If these facilities are constructed,
the land use area density limitation may preclude construction of the
total allowable sector units and such unbuilt units would be transferred
to another sector.
3-14 .
CF
C. Zoos or nature centers with live animals in conjunction
with a publlc park slte.
O. Hospitals outside the Browning Aircraft Approach and
departure corridor for MCAS Tustin.
E. Commercial recreational centers located on public
park and school sites.
F. Residential uses - compliance with Residential Regulations'
detailed in Section 3. 6.1 through 3. 6 4 (medium density)
G. Temporary uses - shall be regulal~ed pursuant to the applicable section of
the city municipal code.
H. Unlisted uses - those uses not. specifically listed in this Section 3.9.2
are subject to Community Development Department determination to be either
permitted, conditional or prohibited uses pursuant to the objectives of
this zoning regulatory document and the purposes of the individual land
use category. Decisions of the Community Development Department may be
appealed to the City Planning Commission.
3.9.3 Site Development Sl~ndards
A.. Building site area: no minimum requirements.
B. Building Height limit: 35 feet unless Community Facility Land use is
located totally within a land use area allowing greater building height,
in which case the greater height limit~hall be allowed.
· .
C. Building setbacks: same setbacks allowed for .the land use area in which
Community Facility Use is located. For uses not located entirely within
one land use area, the most restrictive setback standard for any adjoining
area shall prevail.
O. Landscaping: a minimum of fifteen (15) percent of the building site area
shalI] be 1 andscaped.
E. ?larking: compliance with parking regulations detailed in Section 3.10.
F. Signing: compliance with signing regulations detailed in Section 3.11.
G. Lighting:. all lighting, exterior and interior shall be designed and
located to confine direct rays and glare to the .premises except sports
field lighting which may be allowed subject to a conditional use permit
(Section 3.9.2.A.8).
H. Trash and Storage Areas: All storage, including cartons, containers and
trash, shall be shielded from view within a building or area e.,,., *,lsed by a
masonry wall not less than six (6) feet in height. No such d,,-, shall be
located within fifty {50) feet o-f any residentially designated ,~'ea unless
it is fully enclosed.
3-45
RESOLUTION N0.2632
EXHIBIT ' B'
i
LEGEND
.
Revised
Land Use Plan
EAST'TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN
City of Tustin i~
SEE EXHIBIT I-1 / I-IA FOR SITE SPECIFIC DETAIL
El)AW Inc.
REVISED ...................
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, PENNI FOLEY, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording
Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that
Resolution No. ~J~..~_ii was duly passed and adopted at a~cQgular meeting of
the~stin Planning Commission, held on the ~/:2m~. "day of ~ . ,
198 '~7'. ~-~ --
Recording Secretary
CZTY COUNCTL RESOLUTZONS
lo
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12'
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
201
21
22
23
24
25
26.
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 89-87'
A RESOLUTION OF THE-CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
CALIFORNIA, RECERTIFYING FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT EIR 85-2 FOR THE EAST TU~TIN SPECIFIC PLAN AND
ADDENDUM NO. 89-01 FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-02
(C), ZONE CHANGE 88-02 AND EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 88-01 AND FINDING THAT THE FINAL EIR, AND'
ALL SUBSEQUENT ADDENDUMS AND SUPPLEMENTS ARE ADEQUATE
FOR THE PROJECT AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES
HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT
The City Council of the City of Tusttn does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. That an initial study questionnaire was prepared for General
Plan Amendment 88-02 (C), Zone Change 88-02 and East Tustin
Specific Plan Amendment 88-01 (the "Project"), and it was
determined that Environmental Impact Report {EIR) 85-2 {East
Tustin Specific Plan including all certified supplemental and
addendum documents), with an Addendum (No. 89-01), could be
employed to describe this project, in accordance with California
Environmental Qual i ty Act (CEQA).
B. That the environmental documentation was prepared by City of
Tustin and Michael Bma~dman Associates.
C. That the City provided public notice of its initial study and
its intention to prepare an Addendum for the project. EIR 85-2
(including all certified supplemental and addendum d°cuments.)
and Addendum No. 89-01, including comments, have been reviewed
and considered by the City of Tustin.
D. That EIR 85-2 (including all certified supplemental and addendum
documents) and Addendum 89-01.was prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act, and CEQA Guidelines,
and the policies of the City of Tustin.
E. That pursuant to CEQA, EIR 85-2 (including all certified
supplemental and addendum documents) has previously been
prepared and certified and adequately addresses the general
environmental setting of the project, its significant
environmental impacts, and the alternatives and mi ttgation
measures related to each significant environmental effect, and
that no additional environmental impacts or mitigation measures
were identified in Addendum 89-01.
1
'2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12'
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
:/2
23
24
25
:26
27
28
Resolution No. 89-87
Page t~o
F.
That Addendum 89-01 prepared for the project addresses only
mtnor technical changes or additions and-none of the conditions
described tn Sectlon 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines have occurred.
G.
All Impacts, mlttatlon measures and project alternatives
Identified In the previously certified envlronmental documents.
Identified in Section I A. of thts Resolution have been revtewed
and considered, mitigation measures have been Incorporated Into
the proposed project, as applicable, that eliminate or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as
Identified tn each of the previously certified documents and It
ts determined that any remaining significant effects on the
environment found to be unavoidable have been balanced agatnst
the beneftts of the Project and agat nst the Project alternatives
and those beneftts have been found to be overriding on each
significant lmpact tdenttfle(l in the prevlously considered
environmental documents. Findings and a Statement of Facts
supporting such findings and mitigation measures are llsted in
Exhlbit A of Resolution No. 86-28 and Exhtbtt A of 'Resolution
No. 87-76 and are Incorporated heretn .by reference.
II.
The-Clty Council does hereby certlfy that EIR 85-2 for the East
Tusttn Spectftc. Plan (l~cludtng all certified supplemental and
addendum documents) and Addendum 89-01 are adequate to serve as the
project EZR and that such 'documents have been completed In compliance
with State CEQA law and Guidelines.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of'the City of Tusttn, at a regular
meeting on the day of , 1989.
Ursula E."Ken6&'dy,
Mayor
Mary Wynn, ....
City Clerk
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO: 89-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
89-02(C), A REQUEST TO' CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND
USE DESIGNATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTOR
7 AND 11 OF ~THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
AREA.
The City Council of the City of Tustln does hereby resolve asfollows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. Government Code Section 65358 provides that when it is deemed to
be in the public interest, the legislative body may amend a part
of the General Plan.
B. That a proper application has been filed by the Irvine Company
for the purpose of reclassifying the. General Plan Land Use
designation of property generally located in Sector 7 and 11 of
the East Tustin Specific Project Plan area. The portion of the
project located in Sector 7 is northwest of the intersection of
Irvine Boulevard and Jamboree Road.' The portion of the project
with sector 11 is bounded by Irvine Boulevard on the north,
· Myford Road on the east, Heritage Way on the south and Tustin
Ranch Road on the west.
C. Government Code Seci~Fon 65358(b) states that no mandatory
element of a General.Plan shall be amended more frequently than
four times per calendar year. However, each amendment may
include more than one change. Appropriately in conjunction With
General Plan Amendment 89-02(c), four other Amendments are being
considered which shall be considered one Amendment per
Government Code Section 65358(b).
De
That a public hearing before the City Council to consider
General Plan Amendment 89-02(c) was duly called, noticed, and
held on June 19, 1989.
E. This General Plan Amendment has 'been reviewed in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act and an Addendum to EIR
85-02 has been prepared.
F. The proposed amendments are in the best. interest of the public
and surrounding properties in that the proposed amendments are
consistent with terms of a Letter of Understanding between the
City of Tustin and Irvine Company dated March 11, 1988 and
amended April 3, 1989 and'will guarantee designation of an
adequate high school site and community park sites to serve the
communi ry.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 89-88
Page two
G. The proposed General Plan Amendment Is consistent wlth other
elements of the General Plan.
II. The City Council hereby approve General Plan Amendment 89-02(c) as
shown on Exhibit A and more specifically described as follows:
A. Change the easterly 10 acre portion of the former high school
site located at Irvine Boulevard .and New Myford Road in Sector
11 of the East Tustin Specific Plan from High School (HS) to
Planned Community Residential (PCR);
B. Change the designation of the former 16 acre community park site
located at Irvtne Boulevard and Tusttn Ranch Road in Sector 11
of the East Tustin Specific Plan from Community Park (CP) to
High School (HS); and
C. Change the designation of a former 20 acre residential site
located in Sector 7 of the East Tustin Specific Plan adjacent to
Jamboree Road north of future Keller Drive from Planned
Community Residential (PCR) to Community Park (CP).
·
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin, at a regular
meeting on the day of , 1989.
Ursula' E'" k&nnedy,
Mayor
MarY" W~nn~
City Clerk
8L¥
I
o ,
EXHIB~~ -
RESOLUTION
~10. 89-88
-.-
LEGEND
J PC.~ J'FU~NED COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL
PCR
COMMERCIAL
~ PLANNED COMITY COMMERCIAL
I
,
PUBLIC ANC)
II~ITERMEDIATE SC_J-C)OL
l c.I I COMMUNrW PARK
P-'"4
REGIONAL
· , " / ..--.~.
.o
RECREAT~DN
!i ~:' I ~o~ co~
I
,
I~VISED
LAND USE D~AGRA~-~]
_
I i m IIII II I I I I ·
Tustin Area General Plan
REVISED
El)AW Inc.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. 1024
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 88-02, A
REQUEST TO REZONE CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTORS
7 AND 11 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
AREA
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby ordain as follows:
I®
The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application has been filed by the Irvine Company'
for the purpose of reclassifying the Zoning Plan Map designation
of property generally located in Sectors 7 and 11 of the East
Tusttn Specific Plan project area. The portion of the project
located in Sector 7 is northwest of the intersection of Irvine
Boulevard and Jamboree Road. The portion of the project within
Sector 11 is bounded by Irvtne Boulevard to the north Myford
Road on the east, Heritage Way on the south and Tustin Ranch
Road on the west.
B. That a public hearing before the City Council to consider Zone
Change 88-02 was duly called, noticed, and held on June lg,
1989.
C. This Zone' Change has been reviewed in,accordance with the
California EnvironmelitCal Quality Act and an Addendum 'to EIR
85-02 has been prepared.
D. The proposed rezonlng is necessary to establish consistency with
the General Plan as required by law.
E. The proposed zoning is in the best interest of the public
health, safety, and welfare and would be compatible with the
existing and surrounding uses.
II. The City Council does hereby approve Zone Change 88-02 as shown on
Exhibit A and more specifically described as follows:
Ae
Change the easterly 10 acre portion of property currently
classified as Planned Community - Community Facility (PC-FC)
located at Irvine Boulevard and New Myford Road in Sector 11 of
the East TuStin Specific Plan to Planned Community Residential
(PCR); and
Be
Change the designation of a 20 acre site currently classified as
Planned Community Residential (PCR) located adjacent to Jamboree
Road and north of future Keller Drive in t~e East. Tustin
Specific Plan to Planned Community - Community Facility (PC-CF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
:26
27
28
Ordinance No. 1024
Page two
PASSED AND ADOPTED by
meettng on tl~e
the Ctty Councll of the City of Tusttn, at a regular
day of _ , 1989.'
Ursula E. Kennedy,-
~layor
~ary l~yiin,
ctty Clerk
1
2
3
4
5
ORDINANCE NO. 1026
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF-
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 88-01, PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE
SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE PLAN FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED IN SECTOR 7 AND 11 OF THE EAST TUSTIN.
SPECIFIC PLAN AND NARRATIVE TEXTUAL AMENDMENTS TO THE
SPECIFIC PLAN.
7 The City Council of the. City of Tustln does hereby ordain as follows:
8 I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:-
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ae
Section 3.14 of the East Tustln Specific Plan provides that
amendments to the East Tustin specific Plan shall be initiated
and processed in the same manner set forth by the City Code for
amending the City Zoning Ordinance.
B. That a proper application has been filed by the Irvine Company
for the purpose of making certain Specific Plan Land Use Plan
amendments on certain property generally located in Sector 7 and
11 of the East Tustin Specific Plan. The portion of the project
site located in Sector 7 is northwest of the intersection of
I rvtne Boulevard and Jamboree Road. The portion of the project
site within Sector 11 is bounded by Irvine Boulevard on the
north, Myford Road on the east, Heritage Way on the south and
Tustin Ranch Road on ~ west. In addition to proposed Land Use
Plan amendments, narrative amen[lments are also proposed to
establish textual consistency in the Plan With the proposed map
amendments.
C. A public hearing before the Planning Commission was duly
noticed, called and held on June 19, 1989.
D.
The East Tustin Specific Plan Amendments have been reviewed in
accordance with the California Environmenta.1 Quality Act and
Addendum 89-01 to East Tustin Specific Plan EIR 85-02 has been
prepared.
E. The proposed East Tustin Specific Plan Amendments is in the best
interest of the public health, safety, and welfare and would be
compatible with the existing and surrounding uses.
F. The proposed East Tusttn Specific Plan Amendments will establish
consistency with General Plan Amendment 89-02(c) and Zone Change
88-02.
II. The City Council does hereby approve East Tustin Specific Plan
Amendment 88-01. Textual amendments are shown on Exhibit A and map
amendments are shown on Exhibit B and can be more specifically
described as follows:
A. Change the easterly 10 acre portion of the former high school
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ordinance No. 1026
Page two
Be
Ce
site located at Irvtne Boulevard and New Myford Road in Sector
11 of the East Tustln Speclftc Plan from a High School (HS)
designation to a Medtum High Density (MH) designation;
Change the 16 acre Community Park (CP) designatlon in Sector 11
to the High School (HS) designation; and
Change the designation of a former 20 acre slte located adjacent
to Jamboree Road north of future Keller Drive in Sector 7 from
Medtum High Residential (MH) to Community Park (CP).
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustln, at a regular
meeting on the day of , 1989.
Mary Wynn,
City .Clerk
fJrs{ila" ~.1 Kennedy,
Mayor
EXH:]:BZT A
TO
ORDINANCE NO. 10E6
TEXT PtODZFICAT]:ONS
Table 2.1
Statistical Summary.
Land Use Desi gnati on
Acreage
Residential
Estate (up to 2 du/ac}
Izdw {up to $ du/ac}
Medium Low {up to 10 du/ac}
.Medium {up to 18 du/ac}
Medium-High' (up to 25 du/ac)
415
287
50
222
188
Open Space
Public Neighborhood Parks*
Community Parks
Golf Course
~741
1§0
Commerci al/Busi ness
Neighborhood Commerc i al
General Commercial
Mi xed Use
10
31
121
Institutional
Elementary Schools* 58
Intarmediate Schools 15
High School 40
·
Other Uses
Roads (arterial and major only.*.*) 101
* Certain park and school site acr~,ages have not .been
established. Such acreage wi:ll be t~ken from
residential land use area.
** Acreage for all roads other than arterial and major
roads, has been included in the acreage for the
surrounding land uses.
Residential Land Use: The Land use Plan designates five residential categories,
each of which has maximum density. Residential densities are controlled in all
of the following:, land use areas, sectors and the Specific Plan Area.
For any residential subdivision map the maximum density range cannot be exceeded
for a particular land use area. Lower densities will be permitted in any area.
The boundaries and acreage of the land use areas shown on the Land Use Plan are
approximate and will be precisely determined in the future when subdivision Maps
are reviewed.
The land use areas described within each sector, are subject to the policies
specific to a given sector. These policies are outlined in Sect;,·:n ~.:14.
2-2
The total number of c ling units, for the overall ~ecific Plan Area maY not
exceed 7,950 units. However, if the total .allowable units in Tentative Tract
Map No. 12345 are not constructed, the unbuilt units may be transferred to the
Specific Plan Area in accordance with the provisions of the following
paragraphs.
..
The total number of dwell.ing units in each Sector may not-exceed the figures
specified. Table 2.4. If'a sector is developed with less than the maximum number
of units permitted within the sector, then a transfer of units wil. 1 be permitted
from sector to sector within the Specific Plan Area. These transfers will be
closely monitored. When proposing unit transfers, compatibility with adajacent
land use areas must be considered. Specific requirements for allowing unit
transfers and maximum, unit increases in Sectors are outlined in the Development
Standards in Section 3.0. Also, in Section 3.0 there are more definitive
standards for development of each residential density category.
Mixed Use Designation: The Land Use Plan designates 121 acres in the southeast
corner of the site, in Sector 12 between Bryan Avenue and the I-5 Freeway, as a
mixed use area. A 70-acre commercial center and hotel/motel will be developed
in this area. Additional commercial uses or office and research and development
uses may also be developed within this area. The Mixed Use designation Permits
flexibility for location and configuration of. these uses. It also creates the
opportunity for development to respond to futuhe changes in economic and market
forces. The Development Standards for the Mixed Use Area are defined in Section
3.0.
Non-Residential Land Uses: The Land use Plan (LUP) includes a number of non-
residential uses such as: (1) Schools, (2) Parks, (3) Open Space and-[lecreation
Facilities, and (4) Commercial Land Use designations, lhese are summarized in
the fol 1 owing table:
Table-~-.2
Lart~ Uses Integral to the LU~
Institutional Use
Quantity
Approximate
Total Acreaqe
Intermediate School
High School
Community Park
Golf Course
15
40
)7 41
150
Commercial/Business Use
General Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
31
10
2-3
Table 2.3
.,Land Uses Anticipated in LUP
Institutional' Use
Elementary School
Public Neighborhood Parks
Private Neighborhood Parks
Quantity
3-6
~3'
Vari es *
Approximate
Total Acreage
8-10..
3-4 *
Vari es *
* The exact number, location and size.of private
neighborhood parks will be established with subdi-
vi sion maps.
One high school site is reserved along Irvine Boulevard and cne junior high
school site is designated for the area along Peters Canyon Wash in Sector 2.
Five elementary school sites are to be distributed throughout the Specific Plan
area, and one elementary school has been sited with an adjacent neighborhood
park, which encompasses the redwood/cedar stand situated on Sector 3. Four
other neighborhood parks are generally located in various sectors of the Plan.
Three ($)community parks a're more specifically located: they include an eight-
acre site near the junior high school, a I6 20-acre site, and a 13-acre site
incorporating a'knoll situated south of Portola Parkway.
Elementary and Intermediate schools and public neighborhood parks are
symbolically illustrated on She Land Use Plan. Th~ specific sizes, location and
numbers of these facili'ties will be determined in accordance with the provision
of Subsection 2.8.
2.2 Circulation ~_~
The Circulation Plan, Exhibit D, illusl~ates the backbone vehicular circulation
system for the Specific Plan area. This section describes the existing and
planne,-? arterial highway circulation system for the East Tustin Specific Plan.
Established Arterial Hiqhway Alignments
Street
City of Tustin
Classification
County of Orange
Clas,si fication
Irvine Boulevard
Bryan Avenue
Portol a Parkway
Santa Ana Freeway
Browning Avenue
Future Road
Myford Road
Weir Canyon Road
Major MajOr
Primary Primary
- Major.*
Freeway Freeway
Secondary Secondary
Major* Maj.or or Primary*
Major* -
Eastern Transportation Corridor -
E1 Camino Real Secondary
Primary
Freeway*
* Conceptually ~Pr'oposed
2-4
SECTOR !
·
Subtotal
SECTOR 2
ii
Subtotal
SECTOR 3
Subtotal
SECTOR 4
Subtotal
SECTOR
Subtotal
SECTOR 6
Subtotal
SECTOR 7
Subtotal
SECTOR 8
Subtotal
Acreage
125
125
74
101
50
13
o 10 **
15 **
8 **
271
6
08**
03**
17
· 118
118
98
18
116
31
31
132
o 10 **
I3 33 **
150
436
77
26
o 10 **
0 4' **
117
East Tustin.Statisticai Analysis
Land Use
/
Maximum
Density
i i
* Total
A11 owabl e
Units
Estate Density Residential 2.0 du/ac
188
Estate Density Residential 2 du/a¢
Low Density 'Residential 5 du/ac.
Medium Low Density Residential 10 du/ac
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Elementary School
Junior High School
Community Park
i ,
1,010 +
Low Density Residential
E1 ementary School
Neighborhood Park
Estate Density-Residential
Estate Density 'R'~sidential .
Low Density Residential
5 du/ac
2 du/ac
2 du/ac
5 du/ac
68 +
ii i
177
219
General Commercial
·
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Medium High Density Residential 25 du/ac
E1 ementary School
Community Park
Golf Course
.,, 605 +
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Elementary School
Neighborhood Park
4 du/ac
18 du/ac
349
233
2-24
582 +
Maximum
Acreage Land Use Density
* Total
Allowable
Units.-
SECTOR 9
Subtotal
39 Low Density Residential 5 du/ac
39
156
SECTOR 10
46 Low Density Residential 5 du/ac
15 Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
o 10 ** Elementary School
Subtotal 71
405 +
SECTOR
57
~ 56
40
o 10 **
o 4 **
10
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Medium High Density Residential 25 du/ac
High School
Elementary School
Neighborhood Park
Ne i ghbo rhood Commerc i al
n i i
Subtotal ~83 177 1,540 +
SECTOR 12
121 Mi xed Use
i i i
Subtotal 121 7,950. ***
.Total allowable number of permitted-~u~its within a given sector may be
increased if a sector unit transfers:occurs as described in Subsection
2.1.
** The precise acreage and locations of private and public neighborhood
parks, elementary schools and intermediate schools will be determined as
part of the review of the Sector Subdivision Maps as identified under
Review Procedure Subsection 1.5 and consistent with policies established
in Subsections 2.9 and 2.10 of the Specific Plan.
*** If the maximum allowable units in Tentative Tract Map No. 12345 are not
constructed, the unconstructed units may be transferred to the Specific
Plan area.
This acreage figure is an estimated allocation for this land use. If it
changes, other land use acreage allocations in the sector may change.
However, the total allowable units for the sector will remain the same.
Total Allowable Units assumes that if a school and/or a park currently
designated for this sector are not built in this sector and that the
acreage goes into residential use. If these facilities are constructed,
the land use area density limitation may preclude construction of the
total allowable 'sector units and such unbuilt units would be transferred
to another sector.
2-25 .
Sector 7 /,,
This. is the largest of the 12 sectors in
terms of acreage. The site is virtually
flat and encompasses 436 acres. It is
situated along the eastern boundary of the
site and is bounded by Portola Parkway on'
the north, Myford Road on the east, the
Future Road on the west, and Irvine
.Boulevard on the south.
The site includes a hillside knoll located
south of Portola Parkway, a visually
prominent landform feature which contrasts
with the flat topography within the rest
of the Sector. Eucalyptus windrows occur
along Peters Canyon Wash and in the
easterly portion of the Sector.
This area is plahned to encompass a
variety of residential densities to be
developed around an 18-hole privately
owned and operated golf course which is to
be open for public play.
Residential uses including medium and
medium hi~)h densities are planned for this
Sector. Densities generally decrease from
east to west with the medium-high areas
located along Myford Road.
Also planned for this &rea is an e~ementary school which has not been
precisely located at this time, howevelr.., it is currently allocated for the
southwest quadrant of this sector. The precise location and size of this
school shall be determined as per Subsection 2.10 of this Specific Plan. A
regional riding/hiking trail, and bikeway are planned in accordance with
County Master Plans (Class I). The trail may be located away from Peters
Canyon Wash in order to avoid conflicts with the golf course. The trail
location in Sector 7 shown on the Land Use Plan (Exhibit C) following along
arterial highways is conceptual and may be adjusted to meet specific site
conditions and to ensure trail continuation in the adjoining City of Irvine.
A neighborhood park has also been generally allocated, for this same
quadrant. The size and location of this park will be precisely determined o
as per Subsection 2.8. Finally, a 13-acre community park has been precisely
located to encompass the knoll at the northern most end of the sectorj An
additional 20 acre community park will be provided near the southeast corner of the sector.
The following policies apply to Sector 7:
A. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted within this sector are as
shown in Table 2.4.
B. The golf course as s.hown on the Land Use Plan illustrates a conceptual
boundary. The precise edges of the golf course may .vary as long as the
2-37
area of the other ~idential land useS remain b .~rally consistent with
the Statistical Summary and that the relative location of residential
land use are consistent with Exhibit C.
There may be an adjustment of increased acreage from the minimum acreage
of 150 to the gol.f course from that shown, on the statistical summary.
Any adjustment, however, shall be at the discretion of the landowner,
and can encroach o'n the residential land use parcels within thi's sector.
Such an adjustment would change acreages within those land use parcels,
however, the total maximum number of units~ allowed within the sector
will not be exceeded.
The golf course provides a strong visual image within the sector as well
as the whole community and visibility shall be provided from the
arterial roadways, therefore the golf course shall .directly front on
Myford Road, and Irvine Boulevard, and shall have at least two frontages
on the Future Road. A minimum of 250-feet of lineal frontage shall be
provided at each of these points.
Incorporation of existing eucalyptus windrows shall be considered within
the golf course.
C. In addition to the specific submittal requirements for the Subdivision
Map of this sector, refer to Section 1.5, a conceptual landscape plan
for arterial roadways adjoining this Sector shall also be submitted'with
the Subdivision Map for approval by the Director of Community
Development, refer to Section 2.12 Implementation, for specific
requi rments.
D. A community park'shall be located along the edge south of Portola
Parkway and shall include the north side of the knoll located south of
~his road. Development policies related to this knoll are established
in Section 2.13, Hillside District..Guidelines, Landform Modification.
~ln additional 20 acre Community Park shall be provided adjacent to Jamboree Road and
notch of Itvhte Bottlevard.
[. Where feasible and consistent with flood control requirements, the-
treatment of Peters Canyon Wash (Exhibit L) should retain a natural
appearance by (1) minimizing concrete channelization such as vertical
walls and concrete channel or trapezoidal soil cement; (2) retaining or
replanting indigenous vegetation along the drainage course, and/or
(3) locating the drainage course wi.~hin open space areas.
2-38
Sector
This sector consists of approximately
183 acres. It is bounded by the Future
Road al ignment on the west, Irvine
Boulevard on the north, Myford Road on the
east, and Bryan Av.enue on the south.
Several land uses are proposed within this
sector. The residential uses include
medium de'nsity which is to be located in
the.southwest quadrant of the sector.
Medium high residential development is to
be situated along the eastern boundary of
the site encompassing the entire area
between Bryan Avenue and Irvine Boulevard.
A 40-acre site has been 'designated for a
high school just south of Irvine
.Boulevard. This will be centrally located
to both Myford and the Future Road
extension. ~ ~t~i~y ~()~X ~ ~)t~t
northeast corner of the sector, a lO-acre
neighborhood commercial site-has been
planned at the intersection of Irvine
Boulevard and Myford Road, an important
entry point into the City from the east.
An e)ementary school has been generally
located between the medium and medium high
residential development. The precise s+zes and location of schools shall be
determined as described in Subsection 2.10 of this Specific Plan. A
neighborhood park has been generally located in the area of the medium
residential development. The precise location of this park is to be
determined as described in Subsection 2.8 of this S~ecific Plan.
The following policies-apply to Sector 11:
A. The maximum number of residential units permitted in this sector are as
shown on Table 2.4.
B. In addition to the specific submittal requirements for the Subdivision
Map. of this Sector, refer to .Section 1.5, a conceptual landscape plan
for arterial roadways within this Sector shall also be submitted with
the Subdivision Map for approval by the Director of Community
Development, refer to Section 2.12, Implementation for specific
requirements.
2-43
CI~. A buffer for the E1 Modena channel shall be provided. The methods for
buffering shall include, but not be limited to fencing and landscaping.
2-44
SECTOR 1
Subtotal
Acreage
125
125
* Total
/Maximum A1 lowable
Land Use Density Uni ts
Estate Density Residential 2.0 du/ac
188
S CTOR 2'
Subtotal
SECTOR 3
Subtotal
SECTOR 4
ii
Subtotal
74
101
50
13
10
15
8
271
6
o8
o3
17
118
118
Estate Density Residential 2
Low Density Residential 5
Medium'Low Density Residential 10
Medium Density Residential 18
Elementary School
Junior High School
·
Community Park
Low Dens i ty Res i dent i al
Elementary School
Neighborhood Park
Estate Density Residential
du/ac
du/ac
du/ac
du/ac
du/ac
du/ac .
1,010 +
68 +
177
SECTOR 5
Subtotal
SECTOR 6
Subtotal,
98
18
116
31
31
Estate Density .Residential
Low Density Residential
General Commercial
2 du/ac
5 du/ac
219
SECTOR 7'
I28 vi
132
o 10
I3 33
150
Medium Density Residen. tial 18
Medium High Density Residential 25
Elementary School
Community Park
Golf Course
du/ac
du/ac
Subtotal
SECTOR 8
Subtotal
436
77
26
.o 10
o 4
117
Low Dens i ty Res i dent i-al
Medium Density Residential
E1 ementary School
Neighborhood Park
4
18
du~ac
du/ac
3,605 +
349
233
582 +
3-13 -
Acreage
Land Use
.4aximum
Dens i ty
* Total
Allowable
Units
SECTOR
Subtotal
39
39
Low Density Residential
5 du/ac
156
SECTOR 10
Subtotal
46
· 15
o 10 **
71
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
E1 ementary School
5 du/ac
18 du/ac
405 +
SECTOR 11
57
~ 56
40
o 10 **
o 4 **
10
Subtotal. I~33 177
SECTOR 12
121
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Medium High Density Residential 25 du/ac
High School
E1 ementary School
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Commerci al
Mi xed Use
1,540 +
Subtotal 121 7,95.0 ***
Total allowable number of permitted~u~its within a given sector .may be
increased if a sector unit transfer..occurs as described i~ Subsecti. on
2.1.
** The precise acreage and locations of private and public neighborhood
parks, elementary schools and intermediate schools will be determined as
part] of the review of the Sector Subdivision Maps as identified under
Review Procedure Subsection 1.5 and consistent with policies established
in Subsections 2.9 and 2.10 of the Specific Plan.
*** If the maximum allowable units in Tentative Tract Map No. 12345 are not
constructed, the unconstructed units may be transferred to the Specific
Plan area.
This acreage figure is an estimated allocation for this land use. If it
changes, other land use acreage allocations in the sector may change.
However, the total allowable units for the sector will remain the same.
Total Allowable Units assumes that if a school and/or a park currently
designated for this sector are not built in this sector and that the
acreage goes into residential use. I'f these facil.ities are constructed,
the land use area density limitation may preclude con~*ruction of the
total .allowable sector units and such unbuilt units wbuld be transferred
to another sector.
3-14
CF
C. Zoos or nature centers with live animals in conjunction
with a public park site.
D. 'Hospitals outside the Browning Aircraft Approach and
departure corridor for MCAS Tustin.
oE. Commercial recreational centers located on public
park and school sites.
F. Residential uses - compliance with Residential Regttlations
detailed b~ Seca'on 3.6.1.through,3.6.40nedium densi~)
C
G. Temporary uses - shall be regulated pursuant to the applicable section of
the city municipal code.
H. Unlisted uses - those uses not specifically listed in this Section 3.9.2
are subject to Community Development Department determination to be either
permitted, conditional or prohibited uses pursuant to the objectives of
this zoning regulatory document and the purposes of the individual land
use category. Decisions of the Community Development Department may be
appealed to th~ City Planning Commission.
3.9.3 Site Development Standards
A. Building site area: no minimum requirements.
B. Building Height limit: 35 feet unless Community Facility Land use is
located totally within a land use area allowing greater building height,
in which case the greater height limit-~)hall be allowed.
·
C. Building setbacks: same setbacks ali"~wed for the land use area in which
Community Facility Use is located. For uses not located entir,~ly within
one land use area, the most restrictive setback standard for any adjoining
area shall prevail.
D. Landscaping: a minimum of fifteen (15) percent of the building site area
shal 1 be landscaped.
E. Parking: compliance with parking regulations detailed in Section 3.10.
F. Signing: compliance with signing regulations detailed in Section 3.11.
G. Lighting: all lighting, exterior and interior shall be deSigned and
located to confine direct rays and glare to the premises except sports
field lighting which may be allowed subject to a conditiona.1 use permit
(Section 3.9.2.A.8).
H. Trash and Storage Areas: All storage, including cartons, cmr.*.~iners and
trash, shall be shielded from view within a building or area ,. ~ed by a
masonry wall not less than six (6) feet in height. No such ~ '~hall be
located within fifty (50) feet of any residentially designat¢c~ ~,ea unless
it is fully enclosed.
3-45
ORDINANCE NO. 1026
.. ,
,
·
~ o
'., -'. **.. i*
· . 2' ' *. ',
. . ...,.. *
... ,.,. ~,~* .-. ·
·
-, ,,,o.. ;..,..,,
· ·
· --*..*':'*~.-'*i :, -_
7 ..,% '.% , ~,.
,~,..".
...
-. ,. ~ **, · . .
.~7~i.,'--~~**/' '~-
· ..~ a,,.~m~,..~- % -~ %.. ~,.--
.... ~ ~-....:.:,;~' '*%..*','~%
.. :~ o' ~**~ .'.'... ,~ ;,-'~ .~
· '..*.~, ~ ... ~, · ~ . . ~' ..'
· ;i*~.. .. ..:..**'*-'' '~*-
.'. % - ~ . .* . '~...*.,. · ~ .
, · .. . -,..
~ -~ :*'; '... '*' * ,"I' '.'~.~ .%....*
'. ~.3.,~ ..;.'*'3,.~-:'.. ~..i****
..... ,..~.23:. ~ ~
'.._. ~-.,
.
., . ,*
.
~,..,~. . .
.~, ~.~h,
..*~'~ ~ ,- % t ...:*~".~.,
~-,~-.%
....
;- ~*.~ ,
~* ..~:.
~'~%' =' · *~
~- , ', . %. ~;'** ·,
, r~f.. '~ :
-
. .. . , ~ ''"
%. ...~' ..
E
LEGEND
INSTITUT~NAI./RECREATIONAL
~ ~,~ .....
·
o-
Revised
'.and Plan
I I II I I I II
EAST TUSTIN SPECIRC PLAN
City of Tustin
SEE EXHIBIT I-1 / I-lA FOR SITE SPECIFIC DETAIL )
EDAW Inc..
REVISED
°.
·
ADDENDUM TO FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 85-2
EAST TUb'TIN LAND USE REVISIONS
(SCH No. 8505221?)
l~repared for=
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92680
(714) 544-8890
Contact: Ms. Christine Shingleton
Director of Community Development
Prepared by:
Michael Brandman Associates
Carnegie Centre
2530 Red Hill Avenue
Santa Aha, California 92705
(714) 250-5555
Contact: Michael E. Houlihan, Project Manager
May 1989
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Seetion
Pa~e
Introduction 1-1
Environmental Checklist Form ................................... 2-1
Discussion of Environmental Evaluation 3-1
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · e · · · · · · · · · · ·
Appendix A - East Tustin Specific Plan Text Modifications
Appen. dix B - Traffic Analysis
LIST OF TABLES
Table
Page
East Tustin Land Use Revisions .................................. 1-3
LIST OF E~ITS
Rwhibit
Follows
Page
Project Site Map ............................................... 1-2
Approved Specific Plan Land Uses 1-2
®e®®e®eeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
Proposed Specific Plan Land Uses ................................ 1-2
Approved General Plan Land Uses ................................ 1-4
Proposed General Plan Land Uses ................................. 1-4
Approved Zoning Designation .................................... 1-4
Proposed Zoning Designation ' 1 4
JBX/0190013Dlt
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE
In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this
environmental assessment has been prepared as an addendum to Final Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) 85-2. This addendum, in conjunction with final EIR 85-2, is
intended to fully address the potential environmental impacts of the proposed land
use revisions in an Initial Study format. The proposed discretionary actions covered
by this addendum include (1) general plan amendments, (2) specific plan amendments,
and (3) zone changes.
Section 15164 allows the preparation of an addendum to an EIR when only minor
technical changes or additions are necessary to make the EIR adequate under CEQA,
and when the changes or additions do not raise important new issues about significant
effects on the environment. This addendum evaluates proposed land use revisions for
the project that Was considered in EIR 85-2. No new significant environmental issues
other than those that were raised in final EIR 85-2 have been raised by the proposed
land use revisions.
An addendum need not be circulated for public review, but can be included in~ or
attached to, the final EIR. CEQA requires that a local decision-making body
consider the addendum with the final EIR prior to making a decision on the project.
Final EiR 85-2 was certified by the Tustin City Council on March 17, 1986.
In conformance with Section 15121 of the State CEQA Guidelines, final EIR 85-2 and
this addendum are intended to serve as documents that will generally inform the
decision makers and the general public of the significant environmental effects of
the proposed project and the potential mitigation measures for the proposed
project. Final EIR 85-2 is hereby incorporated by reference into this addendum.
Following is a description of the project location and the characteristics of the
proposed project. Section 2 includes an environmental checklist that provides an
overview of the potential impacts that may or may not result from project imple-
mentation. Section 3 elaborates on the information contained in the environmental
JBX/0190013D1
1-1
eheeldist and identifies any differences in environmental impacts between the
proposed land use revisions and the approved land uses that were analyzed in EIR
85-2.
PROJECT LOCATION
The project site is located in Sectors 7 and 11 in the East Tustin Specific Plan area
(see Exhibit 1). The portion of the project site that is located in Sector 7 is
northwest of the Irvine Boulevard/Jamboree Road intersection. The portion of the
project site that is located in Sector 11 is southeast of the Irvine Boulevard/Tustin
Ranch Road intersection. Regional access to the site is provided by the Santa Ana
Freeway (I-5) and local access to the site is provided by Irvine Boulevard, Jamboree
Road, and Tustin Ranch Road.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project involves revisions to approved land uses (land uses that were
·
proposed in EIR 85-2) in the East Tustin Specific Plan area. The approved and
-proposed specific plan land uses for Sectors 7 and 11 are depicted in Table I and
illustrated in Exhibits 2 and 3. The proposed land use revisions are a reconfiguration
of existing approved land uses. The proposed narrative amendments to the East
Tustin Specific Plan are provided in Appendix A. Also proposed, is a modification of
the list of conditional uses in Section 3.9.2 of the City of Tustin Zoning Ordinance
for the Planned Community 'Community Facility zone by including residential uses
subject to a Conditional Use Permit. Additional environmental analysis would be
required if residential uses are proposed in a Planned Community Community
Facility zone.
The purpose of the proposed land use revisions is to provide a 40-acre high school site
in which the Tustin Unified School District has control over the entire 40 acres.
When the tentative tract map for the high school area was approved, the project
applicant anticipated that a joint use agreement could be negotiated allowing, a 34-
acre high school site and an adjacent 16-acre community park to be used in a
complementary manner. However, the school district determined that it requires
unilateral control over at least 40 acres to ensure a successful high school program
and the city requires unilateral control of the adjacent 16-acre community park
JBX/0190013D1
1-2
. .
..
.'
· . .
.
·
I
· . ,~-.~, ,; '.
..
.~'
· . , . . ..
'. ...
... '~, .:.., .:,.. ..... .
~ . .
· --~-,"~ '.. ...... -: "-~ .-.. ~
... .
.~ y' ° ~ '-'.'~...-.'..'~ ..'.i .... ', '.~::, .-.?'?
:.. .... -..-~..;.,...,.:..~.; '..'.. ~
· '-'.';-..; :~ :. '.':.i ~::'.:'. ".' :' ... '.
..~,*. ~':.~..= ." . .. ':, ....: .=- *. ,.
...
.... . ~.'; .~.~ ~ ~-:
;.'; ~..'.-.: - . -
..
-... .~
i
2
4
3
7
I
,-'Projedt
Site i
..-..
Project Site Map
East Tustin Land Use Revisions
City of Tustin
Ma~
!1
0 1400 2800 FEET
Exhibit I
LEGEND
~IS~NAI./I~Ci~.&TIOKAL.
I
Approved Specific Plan Land Uses
East Tustin Land Use Revisions
City of Tustin
No~
May 1989
!1
0 1400 2800 FEET
Exhibit 2
!:-'-5::~"~ *~':"":' ::' ":"
~,.. ~:.-' -,~.,.. .... ~.-
-4-
.:~; ':..."::
.:: "..~...'1~
:7;..' ~, '~, ~ o
' '"':-' T' -~ · '
o-......
.. _ ·
'4 ' "o°
...;' .
·
o.
ML
i-
LEGEND.
~I'TI'UTIONAL/RECREA~
COMMERC~U./BUSINE$$
Proposed Specific Plan Land Uses
East Tustin Land Use Revisions
City of Tustin
May 1989
!t
o 140o 280o FEET
Exhibit 3
Approved
128 acres
13 acres
3 acres
TABLE 1
EAST TUSTIN LAND USE REVISIONSa
Medium-Density
Residential 18 du/ae
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Sector 7
111 acres
33 acres
0 acre
Proposed
Medium-Density
Residential 18 du/ac
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Sector 11
46 acres Medium-High Density
25 du/ac
56 acres Medium-High Density
25 du/ae
16 acres Community Park 0 acre Community Park
40 acresb High School 40 acres High School
Includes only the proposed revisions to the land uses in Sectors 7 and 11 and does
not include a complete composite of all the uses in Sectors 7 and 11. 'The housing
density caps provided in the specific plan for both Sectors 7 and 11 will not be
modified/increased as a result of the proposed land use revisions.
EIR 85-2 analyzed a 40-acre high school site. During tentative tract map
approvals~ the high school was identified as encompassing 34 acres and the
project applicant anticipated that a joint use with an adjacent 16-acre community
park could be negotiated with the city and the school district to provide adequate
acreage for the high school. The joint use was not approved and the high school is
currently proposed to encompass 40 acres.
to ensure efficient operation of the park facility. As a result, the land uses proposed
in EIlt 85-2 require revisions to provide a 40-acre high school site and a minimum 16-
acre community park. The 16-acre community park in Sector 11 would be
eliminated; however~ an additional 20-acre community park would be provided in
Sector 7, north of Irvine Boulevard.
JBX/0190013D1
1-3
DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS
The proposed project consists of the following discretionary actions, all of which are
the subject of this addendum.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
The approved and proposed General Plan land uses are illustrated in Exhibits 4 and 5
and described below.
Sector 11
Delete the easterly 10-acre portion of the former high school site
designation from High School (HS) change to Planned Community
Residential (PCR).
Change the designation of the former 16-acre Community Park site from
the Community Park (CP) designation to High School (HS).
Sector 7
Change the designation of Planned Community Residential (PCR) on a
former 20-acre residential site to Community Park (CP).
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS
The approved and proposed specific plan land uses are 'illustrated in Exhibits 2 and 3
and described below.
Sector 11
Delete the 16-acre Community Park (CP) designation and replace with
the High School (HS) designation.
Delete the existing High School (HS) designation of the 10-acre portion
adjacent to New Myford Road and replace with a Medium High Density
Residential (MH) designation.
~eetor 7
Change a 20-acre portion of the Medium High Residential (MH)
designation to Community Park (CP).
ZONE CHANGES
The approved and proposed zone changes are illustrated in Exhibits 6 and 7 and
described below.
1-4
JBX/0190013D1 .
PCR
PCR
PCR
PCR
·
IRMA# A~
PCMU
PCR
·
LEGEND
RESE:)ENT]AL
~ PLANNED COMMUNR'Y
COMMERCIAL
J pcc J PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
'PtJ- BLIC AND IN:STfTI.~ONAL
I ...... I$. ~ I~'FERMEDIATESCHOOL
J, HO J HiGH SCHOOL
COMMUNITY PARK
l',,"'".J ~a~o~^~
..~ REGIONAL PARK
~TION
Approved General Plan Land Uses
East Tustin Land Use Revisions
City of Tustin
.Ntich~I I~ndm~
0 1400 2800 FEET
Exhibit 4
PCR
COMMERCIAL
· I ~cc I PLANN~)~~IW COMMERCIAL.
PUBUC AND ~,.S'TiTUT'X2~
~'rERMEDIATE S~L
HI~ ~~L
! .... CPI COMMUN~ PARK
RE~~N
I"". ~, I ~,~~~
Proposed General Plan Land Uses
East Tustin Land Use Revisions
City of Tustin
May 1989
!!
0 1400 2800 FEET
Exhibit 5
-" '~ . PCR
·
.,
.o.
o
·
[.,.
~ .
,~."-' %, ~..- ,
.,..q....o~,., .r ,,
.
~ ~-.
.. ~ ..t .;.' :
.
.., ..~: ~.'~ . .~ --~ ....
~. . . "~ .-.
..,..
..
' . : · .~; ..
· ~ - ~
'~.
..:'. ;.... .
....
· "": '.i.. ;~ ' '.':~ i:::.'. ',
:..:: :..~ ?:.' ·
22-- . ....~.
. .. · ~ ~' '
;.... [ - ~.:"' ~.:~
.
--":: ' '~ 5:'
"-.':.-:':--'." "'"
.
'~.
PCR
PCR
PCR
PCR
PCCF
PCR
PCC
..
!
PCCF
Approved Zoning Designations
East Tustin Land Use Revisions
City of Tustin
LEGEND
I PC,q ! P~ED COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL
~ PLANNED COMML~ COMMERCIAL
I I~MU I PI_ANNED COMMtJN~ MIXED ~
~ R_ANNED COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES
N(~rTh
May 1989
o 1400 2800 FEET
Exhibit 6
PCR
PCR
PCR
PCR
PCCF
PCC
,...
Proposed Zoning Designations
East Tustin Land Use Revisions
City of Tustin ~-
LEGEND
! PCR I PLA~E~ CC)~ F:~ES~,AL
{ Pcc 1 PLANNED COMMUNITY C.,O~E~CIAL
{ PCMU{ PLANNED COMIVLJNITY'MIXED USE
I pcc'~l PLANNED COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY FACii. JTIES
il
0 1400 2800 FEET
Exhibit 7
Sector 1!
· Change the zoning classification of Planned Community Community
Facility (PCCF) to delete the easterly 10-acre portion adjacent to New
Myford Road and change this area to Planned Community Residential
(PCR).
Sector 7
· Change a portion of the property zoned as Planned Community
Residential (PCR), to the elassifieation of Planned Community
Community Facility (PCCF), which is the preferred Community Park
Land Use designation.
JBX/0190013D1
1-5
SECTION ~
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLI~ FORM
I. Baekground
As noted previously, the proposed land use revisions are a reeonfiguration of
the existing approved land uses for the project site. Environmental analysis has
been conducted for the approved land uses in EIR 85-2. The proposed
reeonfiguration of the land uses are not expected to result in any new
significant environmental effects that were not discussed in EIR 85-2.
Following is an environmental analysis that identifies any differences in
environmental impacts between the proposed land use revisions and the land
uses analyzed in EIR 85-2.
Differences in Environmental Impacts Between the Proposed Land Use
Revisions and the Land Uses That Were Proposed in EIR 85-2
(Explanations of all "yes," "maybe," and "no" answers are provided on attached
sheets.)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No
a. Unstable earth Conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or X
overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
X
d. The destruction, covering or modification of X
any unique geologic or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of X
soils, either on or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach X
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any
bay, inlet or lake?
ge
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
X
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
ae
Substantial air emissions or deterioration of
ambient air quality?
X
JBX/0190013D1
2-1
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
ae
Changes in currents, or the
direction of water movements,
marine or fresh waters?
course of
in either
Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of surface
runoff?
c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood
waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
e®
Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alterations of surface water quality, including
but not limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
groUnd waters?
Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or
withdrawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or tidal
waves?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a®
Change in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the number of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
Yes
Maybe
No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
JBX/0190013D1
2-2
Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a®
Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds, land
animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish,
benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction of the number of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
Introduction of new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6. Noise. Will 'the proposal result in:
®
Se
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light and glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial
alteration of the present or planned land use of an
area?
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a®
A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemical or
radiation) in the event of an accident or upset
conditions?
Yes
Maybe
No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
JBX/0190013D1
2-3
11.
12.
13.
14.
bo
Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human
population of an area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, or create a demand for additional
housing?
Transportation/Circulation.
result in:
Will the proposal
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
e. Substantial impact
transportation systems ?
upon existing
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and/or goods?
e. Alterations or waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the following
areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public' facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
Yes
Maybe
No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X_
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
JBX/0190013D1
2-4
15.
16.
Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b®
Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources or energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following utilities?
a. Water?
b. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
d. Power?
e. Natural gas?
f. Communications system?
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
18.
19.
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any. scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal result in 'the creation
of an aesthetically offensive site open to public
view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing'
recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources.
a®
Will the proposal result in the alteration of or
the destruction of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse physical or
aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object?
Yes
Maybe
No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
JBX/0190013D1
2-5
e. Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or
sacred uses within the potential impact area?
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the proposed project have an increased
potential, compared to the approved land
uses, to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the proposed project have an increased
potential to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals, compared to the approved land uses?
(A short-term impact on the environment is
one which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-term
impacts will endure well into the future.)
c. Does the proposed project have impacts that
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable, to a greater extent than the
approved land uses do? (A project 'may
impact on two or more separate resources
where the impact on each resource is
relatively small, but where the effect of the
total of those impacts on the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the proposed project have greater
environmental effects that will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly, than the
approved land uses do?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
JBX/0190013D1
2-6
SECTION 3
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Explanation of all "No" Answers
No significant unstable earth conditions are known to exist on the
project site, and the proposed project, as well as the land uses
proposed on the site in EIR 85-2, would not alter geologic
substructures because extensive grading would not be required.
Development of the proposed project would require minimal
grading activities to alter the topography of the site because the
site is relatively flat. The proposed alteration is not expected to
be significant.
de
e®
No unique geologic or physical features exist on the project site.
The proposed land use revisions would add impervious surfaces on
the project site; however, the additional amount of impervious
surfaces from the proposed land use revisions would 'not be
significantly different than the impervious surfaces that would be
created by the land uses proposed in EIR 85-2. Since no significant
differences would occur from the addition of impervious surfaces
between the proposed land use revisions and the land uses proposed
in EIR 85-2, no significant differences in water runoff from the
impervious surfaces would occur.
f®
The proposed project would not modify any river or stream
channels or lake beds because the project site does not contain
these features.
JBX/0190013D1
3-1
ge
Air
a.
No active or potentially active fault zones are located on the
project site according to EIR 85-2. In addition, landslides and
mudslides would not occur because the terrain is relatively flat.
EIR 85-2 identified that temporary dust would occur during
construction and long-term impacts to ambient air quality would
result from automobile emissions. The temporary dust and long-
term automobile emission impacts to air quality created by the
proposed project would be similar to the impacts to air quality
that would be created by the uses proposed_ for the site in EIR
85-2.
be
The implementation of the proposed land use revisions, as well as
the land uses proposed in EIR 85-2, would not result in the creation
of objectionable odors because the proposed land uses are not
associated with objectionable odors.
Ce
3. Water
The proposed project, as well as the land uses proposed in EIR
85-2, would add impervious surfaces on the site. Implementation
of the proposed land use revisions or the approved land uses for the
site would result in similar minimal increases in temperature in
areas with impervious surfaces.
a.
Ce
The project will not affect water movement in either marine or
fresh water because neither sea water nor fresh water exists on or
adjacent to the site.
The project site is not located in a 100-year flood zone according
to the Flood Insurance Rate Maps prepared by the Federal
Insurance Management Ag,ney.
JBX/0190013D1
3-2
de
e.
f®
go
h.
No water bodies exist on or near the project site.
EIR 85-2 identified that the impervious surfaces created on the
pr.jeer site that are used for parking or circulation would result in
additional auto-related pollutants (e.g., oil, tire particles, etc.).
During storms, these auto-related pollutants would incrementally
reduce the quality of the existing surface flows. Development of
the pr.jeer.site with the proposed land use revisions would result
in a reduction in water quality similar to the reduction from
implementing the uses proposed for the site in EIR 85-2.
Therefore, no new water quality impacts would occur from project
implementation that were not identified in EIR 85-2.
Similar to the approved land uses, the proposed land use revisions
would not alter the direction or the rate of flow of ground waters.
Similar to the approved land uses, the proposed land use revisions
would not change the quantity of ground waters through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through the interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations.
The proposed land use revisions would use water for domestic and
irrigation purposes. This water use would be similar to the water
that would be used by the land uses proposed for the site in EIR
85-2.
e
No water-related hazards are expected to occur on the pr.jeer site
because of its distance from substantial water bodies.
Plant Life
a.,b.
EIR 85-2 identified agricultural crops on the project site; however,
no significant plant life currently exists on the project site
because the site has recently been graded and is vacant.
JBX/0190013D1
3-3
Ce
The proposed projeet would result in the introduetion of onsite
plant species; however, there would be no significant differences
between the species that would occur from the project and those
that would occur from the uses proposed in EIR 85-2.
de
EIR 85-2 identified agricultural crops on the site; however, no
agricultural activities presently occur on the project site.
Therefore, no impacts to agricultural activities would occur.
Animal Life
a.,be
EIR 85-2 identified no. significant animal life on the project site.
The proposed land use revisions would result in a similar
'nonsignificant effect on the diversity of species and number of
animals as the land uses proposed for the site in EIR 85-2.
Ce
de
No animals would be introduced on the project site.
There is no known significant fish or wildlife habitat on the project
site.
6. No~e
ac,be
Existing noise levels would temporarily increase due to
construction activities and long-term levels would increase due to
traffic generated by the proposed land use revisions as well as the
approved land uses. The temporary noise level increases by the
proposed project 'would be similar to those increases associated
with the land uses proposed in EIR 85-2. The long-term noise level
increases by the proposed land use revisions would be slightly less
than the approved land uses because approximately 2 percent less
traffic would be generated by the proposed land use revisions (see
Appendix B). Therefore, less long-term noise associated with
traffic would be generated by the proposed land use revisions
compared to the approved land uses.
JBX/0190013D1
3-4
Light and Glare
Similar to the approved land uses for the site, the proposed land use
revisions would produce light and glare. The proposed land uses would
produce a similar amount of light and glare as the land uses proposed in
EIR 85-2.
Land Use
The proposed project is a reeonfiguration of approved land uses for the
project site. Land use revisions in Sector 7 would include a decrease in
residential acreage and an increase in park acreage. Sector 11 would
result in an increase in residential acreage and a decrease in park
acreage. No significant ~lteration to the approved land uses is proposed by
the project. Also, no significant differences in land use compatibility
effects would occur between the proposed project and the approved land
uses.
e
Naturnl Resources
a. EIR 85-2 identified increases in natural gas consumption by the
land uses proposed on the project site. Since the proposed land use
revisions would result in a reeonfiguration of land uses that were
approved on the project site, the increase in the use of natural gas
would be similar to the increased use in natural gas by the land
uses proposed for the site in EIR 85-2.
10. Risk of Upset
a., b.
Similar to the approved land uses, the proposed land use revisions
would not result in the generation of hazardous materials and
would not interfere with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan.
JBX/0190013D1
3-5
11.
12.
13.
Population
The proposed land use revisions would result in a reeonfiguration of
planned land uses for the project site; however, the residential population
would be similar to the residential population planned for the site in
EIR 85-2.
Housing
The proposed land use revisiOns would not affect any existing housing units
on the project site. The land use revisions would result in a
reconfiguration of the housing units planned for the site in EIR 85-2;
however, the number of housing units would be similar to the planned units
under EIR 85-2.
Transportation/Circulation
a®
The overall Change in project-generated trips between the
proposed land use revisions and the approved land uses for the site
is anticipated to be minimal. Average daily trips to and from 'the
project site are reduced by approximately 2 percent with the
proposed land use revisions compared to the approved land uses..
Peak-hour trips would be reduced by approximately 69 in the
morning and 131 in the evening (see Appendix B).
be
The proposed land use revisions would result in a similar demand
for new parking facilities as the approved land uses. Therefore,
there would be no differences in potential parking impacts
between the proposed land use revisions and the approved land
uses.
c.,d. The proposed land use revisions are expected to transfer trips
generated by approved land uses between adjacent sectors (7, 11)
with an overall reduction in projected total trips by approximately
2 percent. Therefore, Sectors 7 and 11 will not have any
significant impact differences on the level of service at the
JBX/0190013D1
3-6
adjacent intersections and/or locations on the roadway between
the proposed land use revisions and the approved land uses.
e®
The proposed project would not alter waterborne, rail, or air
traffic.
f.
Less traffic would be generated by the proposed project compared
to the approved land uses. Therefore, the proposed project may
result in a decrease in potential traffic hazards.
14. Public Services
a.
Fire. The Orange County Fire Department currently provides fire
protection service to the East Tustin Specific Plan area. The
proposed land use revisions would result in a similar demand for
fire protection services as the land uses proposed in EIR 85-2. The
potential impacts to the fire department were addressed in
EIR 85-2.
b®
C.
Police. Police protection in the project area is provided by the
City of Tustin Police Department.- The proposed project would
result in a similar demand for police protection services as the
land uses proposed in EIR 85-2. The potential impacts to the
police department were identified in EIR 85-2.
The proposed land use revisions do not alter the approved size of
the high school that was proposed and analyzed in EIR 85-2.
Therefore, no new impacts to school facilities would result from
project implementation.
de
Parks or Other Recreational Facilities. Development of the pro-
posed land use revisions would alter the location of planned
parkland on the project site; however, the project would provide
four additional community park acres compared to the approved
;
land uses. No significant differences in the ~mpacts on
recreational facilities would result between the proposed land use
revisions and the approved land uses.
3-7
JBX/0190013D1
e®
Maintenance of Public Facilities, The proposed land use revisions
would result in similar impacts to the maintenance of public
facilities as the approved land uses,
f®
Other Governmental Services. The proposed land use revisions
would result in similar impacts to other governmental services as
the approved land uses.
15. Energy
16.
Utilities
The proposed land use revisions would not significantly alter the
quantity of fuel or energy that is projected for the site in EIR 85-2
because land uses are primarily proposed to be reconfigured on the
site and no significant density increases would occur.
a,
Water. Development of the proposed land use revisions would
result in a similar demand for'water as the land uses proposed in
EIR 85-2. The potential impacts to water facilities were
·
identified in EIR 85-2, . .
be
Sewer. Development of the proposed land use revisions would
result in a similar generation of wast.water as the land uses
proposed in EIR 85-2. The potential impacts to sewer facilities
were identified in EIR 85-2.
d,
Drainage. Development of the proposed land use revisions would
result in similar stormwater runoff as the approved uses in
EIR 85-2. The potential impacts to stormwater facilities were
identified in EIR 85-2.
Electricity. The Southern California Edison Company currently
provides service to the project area. Electricity for the site would
be provided by a substation located at the intersection of Browning
JBX/0190013D1
3-8
Avenue and Bryan Avenue. The proposed land use revisions would
consume a similar amount of electricity as the land uses proposed
in EIR 85-2. The potential impacts to electrical facilities were
addressed in EIR 85-2.
e.
f.
Natural Gas. The project site is within the service jurisdiction of
Southern California Gas Company. The proposed land use revisions
would consume a similar amount of natural gas as the land uses
proposed in EIR 85-2. The potential impacts to natural gas
facilities were addressed in EIR 85-2.
Telephone. The proposed project is located in the Pacific Bell
Telephone Company service area. The proposed land use revisions
would demand similar telephone service as the land uses proposed
in EIR 85-2. The potential impacts to telephone service were
addressed in EIR 85-2.
17. Human Health
18.
a.,b.
Similar to the approved land uses, the proposed land use revisions
would not create significant health hazards.
Aesthetics
The visual character of Sectors 7 and 11 will be altered minimally, with
the implementation of the proposed land use revisions compared to the
approved land uses for the site. The visual changes will be limited by the
elimination of an approved 16-acre community park in Sector 11 and the
addition of a 20-acre community park in Sector 7. Other visual alterations
include 10 additional acres of Medium High Density residential in Sector
11 and 17 less acres of Medium Density residential in Sector 7. Since the
proposed project primarily represents a reeonfiguration of the land use
characteristics in Sectors 7 and 11, significant differences in aesthetic
impacts between the proposed project and the approved land uses would
not occur.
JBX/0190013D1
3-9
19.
Recreation
The proposed land use revisions include the addition of four community
park acres on the project site compared to the approved land uses for the
site. The project would reeonfigure the approved location of the
community park acres; however, no significant differences in the impacts
to recreational opportunities would result between the proposed project
and the approved land uses.
20. Cultural Resources
21.
ae~be,
c.,d.
No known cultural resources are located on the project site.
Therefore, the proposed project and the approved land uses
would not impact cultural resources.
Mandatory Findings of Significance
a®
be
Current~lY, the project site. is vacant and has been recently-
graded. No impacts to plants or wildlife would result from
project implementation or the implementation of the
approved land uses.
The proposed land use revisions would not result in any new
significant long-term adverse environmental impacts that
were not identified in EIR 85-2. The project would result in a
long-term impact on the visual character of the site; however,
this long-term impact was identified in EIR 85-2.
The proposed project would not result in any new significant
cumulative adverse effects that were not identified in EIR
85-2.
de
JBX/01900.13D1
The proposed land use revisions would not create greater
environmental effects which would cause significant direct or
indirect adverse effects on human beings than the approved
land uses. Potential adverse impacts on human beings (i.e.,
noise and traffic) were addressed in EIR 85-2.
3-10
APPgNDIX A
EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN
TEXT MODIFICATIONS
Land Use Designation
Table 2.1
Statistical Summary
Acreage
Residential
Estate (up to 2 du/ac)
Low (up to 5 du/ac)
Medium Low (up to 10 du/ac)
Medium (up to 18 du/ac)
Medium-High (up to 25 du/ac)
Open Space
Public Neighborhood Parks*
Community Parks
Golf Course .
415
287
5O
222
'Y88
·
~7~
15o
Commercl al/Busi ness
Neighborhood Commercial
General Commerci al
Mi xed Use
10
31
121
Institutional
Elementary School s*
Intermediate Schools
High School
58
15
40
Other Uses
Roads' (arterial and major only**)
101
* Certain park and school site acreages have not been
established. Such acreage will be taken from
residential land use area.
·
** Acreage for all roads other than arterial~ and major
roads, has been included in the acreage for the
surrounding land uses.
Residential Land Use: The Land use Plan designates five residential categories,
each of which has maximum density. Residential densities are controlled in all
of the following: land use areas, sectors and the Specific Plan Area.
For any residential subdivision map the maximum density range cannot be exceeded
for a particular land use area. Lower densities will be permitted in any area.
The boundaries and acreage of the land use areas shown on the Land Use Plan are
approximate and will be precisely determined in the future when subdivision Maps
are reviewed.
The land use areas described within each sector are subject to the policies
specific to a given sector. These policies are outlined in Section 2.14.
The total number of dwelling units for the overall Specific Plan Area may not
exceed 7,g50 units. However, if the total allowable units in Tentative Tract
Map No. 12345 are not constructed, the unbuilt units may be transferred to the
Specific Plan Area in accordance with the provisions of the following
paragraphs.
The total number of dwelling units in each Sector may not exceed the figures
specified Table 2.4. If a sector is developed with less than the maximum number
of units permitted within the sector, then a transfer of units will be permitted
from sector to sector within the Specific Plan Area. These transfers will be
closely monitored. When proposing unit transfers, compatibility with adaJacent
land use areas must be considered. Specific requirements for allowing unit
transfers and maximum unit increases in Sectors are outlined in the Development
Standards in Section 3.0. Also, in Section 3.0 there are more definitive
standards for development of each residential density category.
'Mixed Use Designation: The Land Use Plan designates 121 acres in the southeast
corner of the site, in Sector 12 between Bryan Avenue and the I-5 Freeway, as a
mixed use area. A 70-acre commercial center and hotel/motel will be developed
in this area. Additional commercial uses or office and research 'and development
uses may also be developed within this area. The Mixed Use designation permits
flexibility for location and configuration of these uses. It also creates the
opportunity for development to respond to future changes in economic and market
forces. The Development Standards for the Mixed Use Area are defined in Section
3.0.
Non-Residential Land Uses: The Land use Plan (LUP) includes a number of non-
residential uses such as: .{1} Schools, {2) Parks, {3} Open Space and Recreation
Facilities, and (4) Commercial Land. Use designationS. These are summarized in
the fol 1 owl ng table:
Table 2.2
Land Uses Integral to the LUP
Institutional Use
Quantity
Approximate
Total Acreage
Intermediate School I 15
High School I 40
Community Park 3 )7 41
Golf Course I 15-0
Commercial/Business Use
General Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
31
10
2-3
Table 2.3
Land Uses Anticipated in LUP
Institutional Use
Quantity
E1 ementary School
Public Neighborhood Parks
Private Neighborhood Parks
3-6
~3'
Varies *
* The exact number, location and size of private
neighborhood parks will be established with subdi-
vision maps.
Approximate
Total Acreage_
8-10
3-4 *
Vari es *
One high school site is reserved along Irvine Boulevard and one junior high
school site is designated for the area along Peters Canyon Wash in Sector 2.
Five elementary school sites are to be distributed throughout the Specific Plan
area, and one elementary school has been sited with an adjacent neighborhood
park, which encompasses the redwood/cedar stand situated on Sector 3. Four
other neighborhood parks are generally located in various sectors of 'the Plan.
Three ($)community parks are more specifically located; they include an eight-
acre site near the junior high school, a II~ 20-acre site, and a 13-acre site
incorporating a knoll situated south of Portola Parkway.
Elementary and Intermediate schools and public neighborhood parks are
symbolically illustrated on the Land Use Plan.. The specific sizes, location and
numbers of these facilities will be determined in accordance with the provision
of Subsection 2.8.
2.2 Circulation
The Circulation Plan, Exhibit D, illustrates the backbone vehicular circulation
system for the Specific· Plan area. This section describes the existing and
planned arterial highway circulation system for the East Tustin Specific Plan.
Street
Established Arterial Highway Alignments.
City of Tustin County of Orange
C1 assi fi cation C1 assi fi cation
Irvlne Boulevard Major Major
Bryan Avenue Primary Primary
Portola Parkway _
.Major*
Santa Ana Freeway Freeway Freeway
Browning Avenue Secondary Secondary
Future Road Major* Major or Primary*
Myford Road Major* _
Weir Canyon Road . Primary
Eastern Transportation Corridor - Freeway*
E1 Camlno Real Secondary '
* Conceptual ly Proposed
Table 2.,1
East Tustin .Statistical Analysis
SECTOR 1
mn
Subtotal
SECTOR 2
Subtotal
SECTOR 3
Subtotal
SECTOR 4
Subtotal
SECTOR $
Subtotal
SECTOR 6
Subtotal
Acreage
125
125
74
101
50
13
o 10 **
15 **
8 **
271
6
08**
03**
17
118
118
98
18
116
31
31
* Total
Max i mum A l l owab l e
Land Use Density Uni ts
Estate Density Residential 2.0 du/ac
Estate Density Residential 2 du/ac
Low Density Residential 5 du/ac
Medium Low Density Residential 10 du/ac
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Elementary School
Junior High School
Community Park
Low Density Residential
E1 ementary School
Neighborhood Park
5 du/ac
Estate Density Residential
2 du/ac
Estate Density Residential
Low Density Residential
2 du/ac
5 du/ac
General Commercial
188
1,010 +
68 +
177
219
SECTOR 7
Subtotal
SECTOR 8
Subtotal
132
0 10 **
I) $$ **
150
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Medium High Density Residential 25 du/ac
Elementary School
Community Park
Golf Course
436 3,605 +
77 Low Density Residential 4 du/ac 349
26 Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac 233
o 10 ** Elementary School
o 4 ** Neighborhood Park
117
2-24 582 +
Table 2.4 (Cont'd)
SECTOR 9
Subtotal
SECTOR 10
mm
Subtotal
SECTOR
Acreage
39
39
46
15
o 10 **
71
Land Use
Maximum
Density
* Total
Allowable
Units
57
~ 56
40
o 10 **
0 4 **
10
Low Density Residential
5 du/ac
156
m
Subtotal X)~;) 177
Low Dens I ty Res t dent I al
Medium Density Residential
E1 ementary School
5 du/ac
18 du/ac
SECTOR 12
405 +
Subtotal
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Medium High Density Residential 25 du/ac
High School
Elementary School
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Commercial
1,540 '+
121 Mi xed Use
121 7,950 ***
Total allowable number of permitted units within a given sector may be
increased if a sector unit transfer occurs as described in Subsection
2.1.
** The precise acreage and locations of private and public neighborhood
parks, elementary schools and intermediate schools will be determined as
part of the review of the Sector Subdivision Maps as identified under
Review Procedure Subsection 1.5 and consistent with policies established
in Subsections 2.g and 2.10 of the SpeCific Plan.
*** If the maximum allowable units in Tentative Tract Map No. 12345 are not
constructed, the unconstructed units may be transferred to the Specific
Plan area.
This acreage figure is an estimated allocation for this land use. If it
changes, other land use acreage allocations in the sector may change.
However, the total allowable units for the sector will remain the same.
Total Allowable Units assumes that if a school and/or a park currently
designated for this sector are not built in this sector and that the
acreage goes into residential use. I~ these facilities are constructed,
the land use area density limitation may preclude construction of the
total allowable sector units and such unbuilt units would be transferred
to another sector.
2-25
Sector 7
Thts Is the largest of the 12 sectors tn
terms of acreage. The site is vlrtually
flat and encompasses 436 acres. It is
situated along the eastern boundary of the
site and is bounded by Portola Parkway on
the north, Myford Road on the east, the
Future Road on the west, and Irvtne
.Boulevard on the south.
The site Includes a h111slde knoll located
south of Portola Parkway, a visually
prominent landform feature whtch contrasts
wtth the flat topography wtthtn the rest
of .the Sector. Eucalyptus windrows occur
along Peters Canyon Wash and in the
easterly portion of the Sector.
This area is planned to encompass a
variety of residential densities to be
developed around an 18-hole privately
owned and operated golf course which is to
be open for public play.
Residential uses including medium and
medium high densities are planned for this
Sector. Densities generally decrease from-
east to west with the medium-high areas
located along Myford Road.
Also planned for this area is an elementary school which has not been
precisely located at this time, however, it is currently allocated for the
southwest quadrant of this sector. The precise local~ion and size of this
school shall be determined as per Subsection 2.1b of this Specific Plan. A
regional riding/hiking trail, and bikeway are planned in accordance with
County Master Plans {Class I). The trail may be located away from Peters
Canyon Wash in order to. avoid conflicts with the golf course. The trail
location in Sector 7 shown on the Land Use Plan {Exhibit C) following along
arterial highways is conceptual and may be adjusted to meet specific site
conditions and to ensure trail continuation in the adjoining City of Irvine.
A neighborhood park has also been generally allocated for this same
quadrant. The size and location of this park will be precisely determined
as per Subsection 2.8. Finally, a 13-acre community park has been precisely
located to encompass the knoll at the northern most end of the sector. An
additional 20 acre community park will be provided near t/ye southeast comer of the sector. --
The following policies apply to Sector 7:
A. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted within this sector are as
shown in Table 2.4.
B. The golf course as shown on the Land Use Plan illustrates a conceptual
boundary. The precise edges of the golf course may vary as long as the
2-37
area of the other residential land uses remain generally consistent with
the Statistical Summary and that the relative location of residential
land use are consistent with Exhibit C.
There may be an adjustment of increased acreage from the minimum acreage
of 150 to the golf course from that shown on the statistical summary.
Any adjustment, however, shall be at the discretion of the landowner,
and can encroach on the residential land use parcels within this sector.
Such an adjustment would change acreages within those land use parcels,
however, the total maximum number of units allowed within the sector
will not be exceeded.
The golf course provides a strong visual image within the Sector as well
as the whole community and visibility shall be provided from the
arterial roadways, therefore the golf course shall directly front on
Myford Road, and Irvine Boulevard, and shall have at least two frontages
on the Future Road. A minimum of 250-feet of lineal frontage shall be
provided at each of these points.
Incorporation of existing eucalyptus windrows shall be considered within
the golf course.
C. In addition to the specific submittal requirements for the Subdivision
Map of this sector, refer to Section 1.5, a conceptual landscape plan
for arterial roadways adjoining this Sector shall' also be submitted with
the Subdivision Map for approval by the Director of Community
Development, refer to Section 2.12 Implementation for specific
requi rments. '
D. A community park shall be located along the edge south of Portola
Parkway and shall include the north side of the knoll located south of
this road. Development policies related to this knoll are established
in Section 2.13, Hillside District Guidelines, Landform Modification.
~4n additional 20 acre Co~nmutzit~ Park shall be provided ad/acent .to Jamboree Road
north of lrvine Boulevard.
E. Where feasible and consistent with flood control requirements, the
treatment of Peters Canyon Wash {Exhibit L} should retain a natural
appearance by {1) minimizing concrete channelizatlon such as vertical
walls and concrete channel or trapezoidal soil cement; {2) retaining or
anting indigenous vegetation along the drainage' course, and/or
~llocating the drainage course within open space areas.
. 2-38
Sector
This sector consists of approximately
183 acres. It is bounded by the Future
Road alignment on the west, Irvine
Boulevard on the north, Myford Road on the
east, and Bryan Avenue on the south.
Several land uses are proposed within this
sector. The residential uses include
medium density which is to be located in
the southwest quadrant of the sector.
Medium high residential development is to
be situated along the eastern boundary of
the site encompassing the entire area
between Bryan Avenue and Irvine Boulevard.
A 40-acre site has been designated for a
high school Just south of Irvine
.Boulevard. This will be centrally located
to both Myford and the Future Road
extension. ~ ~¢~(l~Y I~I)~X I~ ~W~
~lf~ ~~f f~ f~ ~l~ ~I. At the
northeast corner of the sector, a lO-acre
neighborhood co~ercial site has been
planned at the intersection of Irvine
Boulevard and Myford' Road, an important
entry point into the City from the east.
An elementary schoo) has .been generally
located between the medium and medium high
residential development. The precise sizes and location of schools shall be
dete~ined as described in Subsection 2.10 of this Specific Plan. A
neighborhood park has been, generally located in the area of the medium
residential development. The precise location of this park is to be
dete~ined as described tn Subsection 2.8 of this Specific Plan.
The following policies apply to Sector 11:
A. The maximum number of residential units permitted in this sector are as
shown on Table 2.4.
B. In addition to the specific submittal requirements for the Subdivision
Map of this Sector, refer to Section 1.5, a conceptual landscape plan
for arterial roadways within this Sector shall also be submitted with
the Subdivision Map for approval by the Director of Community
Development, refer to Section 2.12 Implementation for specific
requirements.
2-43
__CI~. A buffer for the E1 Modena channel shall be provided. The methods for
buffering shall include, but not be limited to fencing and landscaping.
2-44
F_.AST TUSTIN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
m i
SECTOR 1
Acreage
125
Subtotal 125
* Total
Max t mum A11 owab 1 e
Land Use Density Units
Estate Density Residential
2.0 du/ac
SECTOR 2
74
101 ·
50
13
o 10 **
15 **
8 **
mil
Subtotal 271
Estate Density Residential 2 du/ac
Low Density Residential 5 du/ac
Medium Low Density Residential 10 du/ac
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Elementary School
Junior High School
Community Park
SECTOR 3
6
08**
03**
Subtotal 17
Low Dens i ty Res i dent I al
E1 ementary School
Neighborhood Park
5 du/ac
SECTOR 4
118
Subtotal 118
Estate Dens.ity Residential
2 du/ac.
SECTOR $
98 Estate Density Residential
18 Low Density Residential
m~
Subtotal 116
2 du/ac
5 du/ac
SECTOR 6
31
General Commercial
Subtotal 31
188
1,010 +
68 +
177
219
SECTOR 7
Subtotal
SECTOR 8
Subtotal
132
o I0 **
I)$$ **
150
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Medium High Density Residential 25 du/ac
Elementary School
Community Park
Golf Course
436
3,605 +
77 Low Density Residential 4 du/ac 349
26 Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac 233
o 10 ** Elementary School
o 4 ** Neighborhood Park
117 -
3-13 582 ~
EAST TUSTIN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (Cont'd)
SECTOR 9
Subtotal
SECTOR 10
Subtotal
SECTOR
Acreage
39
39
46
15
o 10 **
Land Use
Low Density Residential
!
Maximum
Density
5 du/ac
* Total
Allowable
Units'
156
71
Low Dens I ty Res I dent I al
Medium Density Residential
Elementary School
5 du/ac
18 du/ac
57
4O
o 10 **
o 4 **
10
405 +
Subtotal I8) 177
SECTOR12
121
Subtotal 121
Medium Density Residential 18 du/ac
Medium High Density Residential 25 du/ac
High School
Elementary School
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Commercial
1,540 +
Mi xed Use
7,950 ***
Total allowable number of permitted units within a given sector may be
increased if a sector unit transfer occurs as described in Subsection
2.1.
** The precise acreage and locations of private and public neighborhood
parks, elementary schools and .intermediate schools will be determined as
part of the review of the Sector Subdivision Maps as identified under
Review Procedure Subsection 1.5 and consistent with policies established
in Subsections 2.g and 2.10 of the Specific Plan.
*** If the maximum allowable units in Tentative Tract Map No. 12345 are not
constructed, the unconstructed units may be transferred to the Specific
P1 an area.
This acreage figure is an estimated allocation for this land use. If it
changes, other land use acreage allocations in the sector may change.
However, the total allowable units for the sector will remain the same.
Total Allowable Units assumes that if a school and/or a park currently
designated for this sector are not built in this sector and that the
acreage goes into residential use. If these facilities are constructed,
the land use area density limitation may preclude construction of the
total allowable sector units and such unbuilt units would be transferred
to another sector.
3-14
CF
C. Zoos or nature centers with live animals in conjunction
with a public park site.
D. Hospitals outside the Browning Aircraft Approach and
departure corridor for MCAS Tustin.
E. Commercial recreational centers located on public
park and school sites.
F. Residential uses - compliance with Residential Regulations
detailed in Seca'on 3. 6.1 through 3. 6. 4 (medium density)
C
C
G. Temporary uses - shall be regulated pursuant to the applicable section of
the city municipal code.
H. Unlisted uses - those uses not specifically listed in this Section 3.g.2
are subject to Community Development Department determination to be either
permitted, conditional or prohibited uses pursuant to the objectives of
this zoning regulatory document and the purposes of the individual land
use category. Decisions of the Community Development Department may be
appealed to the City Planning Commission.
3.9.3 Site Development Standards
A. Building site area., no minimum requirements.
B. Building Height limit: 35 feet unless Community Facility Land use is
"located tOtally w.ithin a land use area allowing greater building height,
in which Case the greater height limit shall be allowed.
C. Building setbacks: same setbacks allowed for the land use area in which
Community Facility Use is located. For uses not located entirely within
one land use area, the most restrictive setback standard for any adjoining
area shall prevail.
D. Landscaping: a minimum of fifteen {15) percent of the building site area
shal 1 be landscaPed.
E. Parking.. compliance with parking regulations detailed in Section 3.10.
F. Slgnin_q: compliance with signing regulations detailed in Section 3.11.
G. Lighting: all lighting, exterior and interior shall be designed and
located to confine direct rays and glare to the premises except sports
field lighting which may be allowed subject to a conditional use permit
(Section 3.9.2.A.8).
H. ..Trash and Storage Areas: All storage, including cartons, conta, tners and
trash, shall be shielded from view within a building or area e,,, ~sed by a
masonry wall not less than six {6) feet in height. No such ar,~., shall be
located within fifty {50) feet of any residentially designated area unless
it is fully enclosed.
-45
APPENDIX B
TltAF~C ANALYSIS
AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
1450 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE, SUITE 10,8 · SANTA ANA,,CALIFORNIA 92701 · TELEPHONE (714) 667-0496
FAX (714) 667-7952
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM~
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Michael Houlihan, Michael Brandman Associates
Denise Schnarr, Austin-Foust Associates
EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
March 30, 1989
This memo is intended as an addendum to the "East Tustin Specific Plan Traffic
Analysis", Austin-Foust Associates, Inc.,' December 13, 1985. The traffic analysis served as
part of the application process for the East Tustin Specific Plan and identifies traffic i. mpacts
of the land uses subsequently approved in the Specific Plan.
The Irvine Company has since submitted an application to the City Of Tustin to revise
land uses in two adjacent'parcels,. Sectors 7 and 11. .These land uses (those previously
approved and currently proposed) are summarized in the attached Table 1 together with the
corresponding trip generation.
As is shown, the overall change in project-generated trips is minimal. Average daily
trips to and from the project are reduced by approximately two percent, with a peak hour trip
reduction of about 100 in both the AM and PM peak.
·
The land use revisions, in affect, transfer project trips between adjacent sectors with an
overall reduction in total trips. It is, therefore, our conclusion that the land use revisions
proposed for Sectors 7 and 11 will not have any significant impact on the level of service at
~the adjacent intersections and/or locations on the roadway.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions.
i ,-i
0 0
0
cO
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 o
0 0 0
aO aO
,4'
0 0 0
0 0 0
i i
0
0 0 0
z
oo~