Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 09-18-89REPORTS NO. 1 9-18-89 TUSTIN PLANNING CO)e4ISSION REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 11. 1989 CALL TO ORDER: 7-00 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/I NVOCATION ROLL CALL: PUBLIC CONCERNS' Pontious, Le Jeune, Baker, Shaheen, Kasparian (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 1. Minutes of the Au.gust 28, 1989 Plannin9 Commission meeting Conm~issioner Le Jeune moved, Pontious seconded to approve the minutes of the August 28. 1989 meeting. ,, Motion carried 4-0-1 (Baker abstained). 2. Final Map 13627 (Sector Map for Sector 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6} APPLICANT/ OWNER' LOCATION' ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS' REQUEST' FOOTHILL COMMUNITY BUILDERS 550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE BOX I ........... ~'~- '-L~ NEWPORT BEACH, CA ROUGHLY BOUNDED BY CITY OF TUSTIN EASTERLY BOUNDARY AND FUTURE EXPANSION OF jAMBOREE ON THE EAST, PORTIONS OF THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF THE TUSTIN RANCH AREA AND FUTURE EASTERN BOUNDARY PROPOSED FOR PETER'S CANYON REGIONAL PARK ON THE WEST, FUTURE PORTOLA PARKWAY AND THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE CITY AND PETER'S CANYON REGIONAL PARK ON THE NORTH MINITERIAL PROJECT SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 599 ACRES OF LAND PROVIDING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFIC LAND USES PURSUANT TO THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN. Planning Commission Action Agenda September 11, 1989 Page two Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of Final Map 13627 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2671 as submitted or revised. Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development C___r~_..issioner Le Jeune moved, Shaheen seconded to approve Final Nap 13627 by the adoption of R~solution No. 2671 with the follow~ng changes made by the Director: Item I.A. line 3 should read 'creating 27 numbered and numerous lettered lot subdi vi si on as' Item I.A.2.a. line 3 should read 'and parkway landscape plans relative to Sectors 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the East Tustin Specific Plan Phase IV have been met o, Item I.C.5. the last line should read 'Tustin Unified School District and the Facilities Agreement consil'~;tent with the East Tustin Specific Plan. Noti on carri ed 5-0. PUBLIC HEAR I NGS 3. Variance 89-0.9 {Dynachem) APPLICANT' MR. TERRENCE MCRELL MORTON THIOKOL, INC. DYNACHEM DIVISION 2631 MICHELLE DRIVE TUSTIN, CA 92680 LOCATION: 2631MICHELLE DRIVE ZONING' PC-IND (PLANNED COMMUNITY - INDUSTRIAL) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS' THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 5) FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. REQUEST' A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING FROM 389 SPACES TO 357 TO ACCOMMODATE APPROXIMATELY 8,000 SQUARE FEET OF MEZZANINE AREA FOR AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING. Recommendation· It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny Variance 89-09 by adopt'ion of Resolution No. 2653. Presentation' Daniel Fox, Associate Planner C~issioner Baker moved, Le deune seconded to deny Variance 89-09 by the adoption of Resolution 'No. '2653. Notion carried 5-0. 4. Amendment to Use Permit 88-15 APPLICANT' DONAHUE SCHRIBER 3501 jAMBOREE ROAD SUITE 300, SOUTH TOWER. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 Planning Commission Action o.~enda September 11, 1989 Page three OWNER' LOCATION· ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS' REQUEST' THE IRVINE COMPANY P.O. BOX I NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8904 THE TUSTIN MARKET PLACE PLANNED COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL' EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN - MIXED USE COMMERCIAL THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 11) PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 15311(a) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND THE APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE TUSTIN MARKET PLACE. Recommendation' It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve an amendment to the Tustin Market Place Sign Program by adopting Resolution No. 2657, subject to the conditions contained therein, as'submitted or revised. Presentation: Steve Rubin, Associate Planner Con~nissioner Le Jeune moved, Kasparian seconded to approve an amendment to Use Permit '~3-15 (the Tustin Market Place sill'lgn Iprogram) by the adoption of Resolution No. 2657 .lith the fol I owi ng changes: '- Add Item I. O. The Planning Comission finds that the location of fast food ---- restaurants in a 77t acre shopping center is a unique condition that is not found elsewhere in the City and that freeway signage for the four such restaurants in the Tustin Market Place is therefore justified. Change the following items in Item II as follows: C. Under Section 1.6 (Tenant areas) Type II, item #3 shall be deleted. ("One sign band identification per bay'). O. A maximum of 10 freeway signs shall be permitted, advertising the names of major tenants and-fast food restaurants as submitted per model with a maximum, of 4 fast food restaurants. The Planning Comission finds that the location of fast food restaurants in a 77t acre shopping center is a unique condition that is not found elsewhere in the City and that freeway si gnage for the four such restaurants in the Tustin Market Place is therefore justi fled. E. Section 1.5. G, Multi-Tenant Monument Signs; shall be modified to limit the number of multi-tenant monument signs to two (2) signs. F. Lettering on existing and future Freeway Signs shall be revised in accordance with Exhibit 'B' of the amended Sign Program dated August 25, 1989 and included with the Planning Co~ission staff report dated September 11, lgBg as Attachment I I I. Planning Commission Action. ~enda September 11, 1989 Page four . .. _ H. Section 1.5.C., Building Fascia Signs (Exhibit C); shall be amended to limit such signs to a maximum of two (2) tenants. The design of the fascia shall reflect that shown at the September 11, 1989 Planning Commission meeting and shall be flexible enough to accmmnodate the two foot high aluminum sign band should the need arise in the future. Revised structural plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to field alterations. It shall be noted that no adverti sing shal 1 be permitted only busi ness indent i fi cat i on. I. Section 1.$.C.1, Building Fascia Signs; North Entertainment Village, Building A (Exhibit C), shall be revised to restrict the fascia signs on Building 'A' in the theatre/retail facility of the North Village to tenants having access or frontage on the Village Center Court only. J. If Option A, as described in Section 1.5. D. is implemented, it shall be used for all tenants .in all buildings in the North Entertainment Village Theatre Complex. Determination to implement option A shall be made prior to issuance of building permits. Appropriate designs shall be included with structural drawings at building plan check. K. Section 1.$.F1~., Theatre Marquee (Exhibit H) shall be revised to limit the allowed square footage of the theatre marquee sign to 200 square feet, including the name of the theatre operator. (Item Fl is deleted and the remainder are relettered). M. All unamended provisions of the Master Sign Program of July 11, 1988, not herein amended per this Resolution, shall remain in full force and effect. N. All appli cable conditions contai ned i n Resolution No. 2516, incorporated herein by reference and not otherwise amended by this Resolution, shall remain i n ful 1 force and effect. O. The applicant shall submit a revised Sign Program which includes all corrections made by this Resolution for review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of any sign permits affected by this Resolution. The revised Sign Program shall incorporate all sign criteria for tenant and project identification, for all Phases of ~ Market Place, into one comprehensive document. P. The revised color combination for project signage, consisting of the subdued purple background with white letters, shall be used on project signage only, no walls (i.e. all perimeter and/or screen walls). At the conclusion of the one year time period from the adoption date of this Resolution, the Planning Commission will review the color of poject signage and may request modifications to the approved color. Planning Commission Action .genda September 11, 1989 Page fi ve Motion carried 5-0. i, OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS STAFF CONCERNS 5. City Council Action Agenda - September 5, 1989 Meetinl~ Presentation' Christine Shingleton, Director of Communi.ty Development No Planning Commission action necessary. COII4ISSION CONCERN Commissioner Le Jeune noted that the furniture store on Newport Avenue has storage in back and there is a trash bin on site that is not in an enclosure. He also noted that there is a satellite dish in the Auto Center. The Director noted that staff would follow up on these matters. Conmissioner Kasparian questioned whether ._ the red curbing on Newport Avenue at Andrews Street was tie~ into the Champion development. The Director noted that it was not and that the painting of the curb has been put on the regular maintenance schedule for curb painting by the Public Works Depart~nt. Commissioner Baker noted there are a lot of window signs and sandwich boards at the Market P1 ace. The Director incidated that the Code Enforcenmnt officer would follow-up. Conmissioner Pontious noted that she would be out of to~m for the Sept~,nber 25, 1989 nmeti rig. ADJOURNMENT At 9:55 p.m. Commissioner Baker nmved, Shaheen seconded to adjourn to the next regular scheduled lplanniflg Commission meeting On Sept~be'r' 25, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chmbers. Motion carried $-0.