HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 09-18-89REPORTS
NO. 1
9-18-89
TUSTIN PLANNING CO)e4ISSION
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 11. 1989
CALL TO ORDER:
7-00 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/I NVOCATION
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC CONCERNS'
Pontious, Le Jeune, Baker, Shaheen, Kasparian
(Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of the Au.gust 28, 1989 Plannin9 Commission meeting
Conm~issioner Le Jeune moved, Pontious seconded to approve the minutes of the August
28. 1989 meeting. ,, Motion carried 4-0-1 (Baker abstained).
2. Final Map 13627 (Sector Map for Sector 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6}
APPLICANT/
OWNER'
LOCATION'
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS'
REQUEST'
FOOTHILL COMMUNITY BUILDERS
550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE
BOX I ........... ~'~- '-L~
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
ROUGHLY BOUNDED BY CITY OF TUSTIN EASTERLY BOUNDARY AND FUTURE
EXPANSION OF jAMBOREE ON THE EAST, PORTIONS OF THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF
THE TUSTIN RANCH AREA AND FUTURE EASTERN BOUNDARY PROPOSED FOR PETER'S
CANYON REGIONAL PARK ON THE WEST, FUTURE PORTOLA PARKWAY AND THE
NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE CITY AND PETER'S CANYON REGIONAL PARK ON THE
NORTH
MINITERIAL PROJECT
SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 599 ACRES OF LAND PROVIDING FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFIC LAND USES PURSUANT TO THE EAST TUSTIN
SPECIFIC PLAN.
Planning Commission Action Agenda
September 11, 1989
Page two
Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to the City
Council approval of Final Map 13627 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2671 as
submitted or revised.
Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development
C___r~_..issioner Le Jeune moved, Shaheen seconded to approve Final Nap 13627 by the
adoption of R~solution No. 2671 with the follow~ng changes made by the Director:
Item I.A. line 3 should read 'creating 27 numbered and numerous lettered lot
subdi vi si on as'
Item I.A.2.a. line 3 should read 'and parkway landscape plans relative to
Sectors 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the East Tustin Specific Plan Phase IV have been
met o,
Item I.C.5. the last line should read 'Tustin Unified School District and the
Facilities Agreement consil'~;tent with the East Tustin Specific Plan.
Noti on carri ed 5-0.
PUBLIC HEAR I NGS
3. Variance 89-0.9 {Dynachem)
APPLICANT'
MR. TERRENCE MCRELL
MORTON THIOKOL, INC. DYNACHEM DIVISION
2631 MICHELLE DRIVE
TUSTIN, CA 92680
LOCATION: 2631MICHELLE DRIVE
ZONING' PC-IND (PLANNED COMMUNITY - INDUSTRIAL)
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS' THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 5) FROM THE
PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
REQUEST' A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING FROM 389
SPACES TO 357 TO ACCOMMODATE APPROXIMATELY 8,000 SQUARE FEET OF
MEZZANINE AREA FOR AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING.
Recommendation· It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny Variance
89-09 by adopt'ion of Resolution No. 2653.
Presentation' Daniel Fox, Associate Planner
C~issioner Baker moved, Le deune seconded to deny Variance 89-09 by the adoption of
Resolution 'No. '2653. Notion carried 5-0.
4. Amendment to Use Permit 88-15
APPLICANT'
DONAHUE SCHRIBER
3501 jAMBOREE ROAD
SUITE 300, SOUTH TOWER.
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
Planning Commission Action o.~enda
September 11, 1989
Page three
OWNER'
LOCATION·
ZONING:
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS'
REQUEST'
THE IRVINE COMPANY
P.O. BOX I
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8904
THE TUSTIN MARKET PLACE
PLANNED COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL' EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN - MIXED USE
COMMERCIAL
THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS
11) PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 15311(a) OF THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND THE APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE TUSTIN
MARKET PLACE.
Recommendation' It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve an
amendment to the Tustin Market Place Sign Program by adopting Resolution No.
2657, subject to the conditions contained therein, as'submitted or revised.
Presentation: Steve Rubin, Associate Planner
Con~nissioner Le Jeune moved, Kasparian seconded to approve an amendment to Use Permit
'~3-15 (the Tustin Market Place sill'lgn Iprogram) by the adoption of Resolution No. 2657
.lith the fol I owi ng changes: '-
Add Item I. O. The Planning Comission finds that the location of fast food
---- restaurants in a 77t acre shopping center is a unique condition that
is not found elsewhere in the City and that freeway signage for the
four such restaurants in the Tustin Market Place is therefore
justified.
Change the following items in Item II as follows:
C. Under Section 1.6 (Tenant areas) Type II, item #3 shall be deleted. ("One
sign band identification per bay').
O. A maximum of 10 freeway signs shall be permitted, advertising the names of
major tenants and-fast food restaurants as submitted per model with a
maximum, of 4 fast food restaurants. The Planning Comission finds that
the location of fast food restaurants in a 77t acre shopping center is a
unique condition that is not found elsewhere in the City and that freeway
si gnage for the four such restaurants in the Tustin Market Place is
therefore justi fled.
E. Section 1.5. G, Multi-Tenant Monument Signs; shall be modified to limit the
number of multi-tenant monument signs to two (2) signs.
F. Lettering on existing and future Freeway Signs shall be revised in
accordance with Exhibit 'B' of the amended Sign Program dated August 25,
1989 and included with the Planning Co~ission staff report dated
September 11, lgBg as Attachment I I I.
Planning Commission Action. ~enda
September 11, 1989
Page four .
.. _
H. Section 1.5.C., Building Fascia Signs (Exhibit C); shall be amended to
limit such signs to a maximum of two (2) tenants. The design of the
fascia shall reflect that shown at the September 11, 1989 Planning
Commission meeting and shall be flexible enough to accmmnodate the two
foot high aluminum sign band should the need arise in the future. Revised
structural plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Community Development Department prior to field alterations. It shall be
noted that no adverti sing shal 1 be permitted only busi ness
indent i fi cat i on.
I. Section 1.$.C.1, Building Fascia Signs; North Entertainment Village,
Building A (Exhibit C), shall be revised to restrict the fascia signs on
Building 'A' in the theatre/retail facility of the North Village to
tenants having access or frontage on the Village Center Court only.
J. If Option A, as described in Section 1.5. D. is implemented, it shall be
used for all tenants .in all buildings in the North Entertainment Village
Theatre Complex. Determination to implement option A shall be made prior
to issuance of building permits. Appropriate designs shall be included
with structural drawings at building plan check.
K. Section 1.$.F1~., Theatre Marquee (Exhibit H) shall be revised to limit the
allowed square footage of the theatre marquee sign to 200 square feet,
including the name of the theatre operator.
(Item Fl is deleted and the remainder are relettered).
M. All unamended provisions of the Master Sign Program of July 11, 1988, not
herein amended per this Resolution, shall remain in full force and effect.
N. All appli cable conditions contai ned i n Resolution No. 2516, incorporated
herein by reference and not otherwise amended by this Resolution, shall
remain i n ful 1 force and effect.
O. The applicant shall submit a revised Sign Program which includes all
corrections made by this Resolution for review and approval by the
Community Development Department prior to issuance of any sign permits
affected by this Resolution. The revised Sign Program shall incorporate
all sign criteria for tenant and project identification, for all Phases of
~ Market Place, into one comprehensive document.
P. The revised color combination for project signage, consisting of the
subdued purple background with white letters, shall be used on project
signage only, no walls (i.e. all perimeter and/or screen walls). At the
conclusion of the one year time period from the adoption date of this
Resolution, the Planning Commission will review the color of poject
signage and may request modifications to the approved color.
Planning Commission Action .genda
September 11, 1989
Page fi ve
Motion carried 5-0.
i,
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
STAFF CONCERNS
5. City Council Action Agenda - September 5, 1989 Meetinl~
Presentation' Christine Shingleton, Director of Communi.ty Development
No Planning Commission action necessary.
COII4ISSION CONCERN
Commissioner Le Jeune noted that the furniture store on Newport Avenue has storage in
back and there is a trash bin on site that is not in an enclosure. He also noted
that there is a satellite dish in the Auto Center.
The Director noted that staff would follow up on these matters.
Conmissioner Kasparian questioned whether ._ the red curbing on Newport Avenue at
Andrews Street was tie~ into the Champion development.
The Director noted that it was not and that the painting of the curb has been put on
the regular maintenance schedule for curb painting by the Public Works Depart~nt.
Commissioner Baker noted there are a lot of window signs and sandwich boards at the
Market P1 ace.
The Director incidated that the Code Enforcenmnt officer would follow-up.
Conmissioner Pontious noted that she would be out of to~m for the Sept~,nber 25, 1989
nmeti rig.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:55 p.m. Commissioner Baker nmved, Shaheen seconded to adjourn to the next
regular scheduled lplanniflg Commission meeting On Sept~be'r' 25, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. in
the City Council Chmbers. Motion carried $-0.