HomeMy WebLinkAboutOB 1 J.W. AIRPORT RPT 11-06-89OLD BUSINESS
NO. 1
TO:
FROM:
SUBdEGT:
WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MAN]%GER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP]%RTMENT
]%IRPORT ST]%TUS REPORT: JOHN W]%YNE ]%IRPORT (JW]%) , ]%IRPORT
SITE CO]%LITION (]%SC) ,. CO]%LITION FOR ]% RESPONSIBLE ]%IRPORT
SOLUTION (CRAS) AND HELICOPTER OVERFLIGHTS TASK FORCE
(HOTF)
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION
JWA - The Airport Commission review of the Phase 2 Access Plan was
rescheduled to November 8th, with the Board of Supervisors hearing
scheduled for November 15th. Staff will attend both hearings.
ASC - The next, and perhaps last, ASC meeting has been scheduled
for Saturday, November 18th a~ 8:'00 a.m. at the-University Club at
U.C.I. Staff will attend and report back to Council in the
December 4th status report.
CRAS - Attached to this report is a memo from Kathy Weil discussing
the October 23rd Board Meeting.
HOTF - There is no new information to report at this time.
Steve Rubin,
Associate Planner
Christine A. ~hingl~on,
Director of Community Development
SR: CAS: kbc
Attachments: Memo from Kathy Weil
MEMO
TO: TUSTIN CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: KATHY WEIL
RE: OCTOBER 23, 1989 MEETING OF "CRAS" BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Sam Rake, Irvine staff member appointed as watchdog for CRAS, gave a status report of the ongoing saga of Ken Delano,
ICAA, SCAG and the multi-use of E1 Toro.
Ken Delano's study of the feasibility of E1 Toro should be completed by October 30. The ICAA will see the final report by
Nov 18, with SCAG receiving the report by Nov 21. With Sam attending all these meetings we should have a copy of Ken's
report by the November meeting of CRAS. I think it's obvious what his conclusions will be, though he will probably take
a circuitous route to conclude that E1 Toro is THE site. CRAS and the Marines at E1 Toro are preparing a rebuttal though,
so the fight goes on. One interesting note - on "page 4" of Ken's initial report to $CAG (copy included) - the chart reveals
Ken's motives. Under Exclusive Use (Practical) - those figures (according to Sam Rake) assume the complete closure of
John Wayne airport. The same is true on page 5, under E1 Toro - All Civilian. Without interference from John Wayne the
skys wouldn't be nearly so crowded with aircraft. The Marine Corps will hold offcomment until the final report gets to the
Airport Working Coalition. .
One side note: The City of Ir-vine sent a letter to SCAG and ICAA complaining that county funds are being spent to
duplicate effort that has already been done. They've received no response. Irvine has. also requested that they be given the
opportunity to review Mr. Delano's findings.
If you'd like to get more information on this you might call Sam Rake, at the City of Irvine at 724-6381.'
818 West Seventh Street, 12th Floor · Los Angeles, California 90017 ~J (213) 236-1800 · FAX (213) 236-1825
]~,~I.'UTFVIr. (':C)MMI'I'! Kr
h,,P'~id Count7
'~; vc...le Coumy
Rob~r~ FarrHI, CYtmctlm~dl,,~,
I ,,x ,\n.c¢lc.~
C,I.: nl I~n~. B¢~ch
CL~rem~ ~mith. £'n,ncJm~,,&'r
Lang 6c:,cn
t~'dic.~ of Ri~¢r."k. t:ounty
.l~ck Clarke.
Rh~: r~idc
C'idc~
John i e~GIk.,
Rialt.n
In, yin Fried.
Y,,,h;, l inda
.{,~ki ~~.
Ra,wl~, Palos Vo'dc~
ma ~ach
MO~no Valley
August 25, 1989
Mr. Ken'Delino
Executive Director
Inter-County Airport Authority
3200 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach', California 92658-8915
Dear Mr. Delino:
As you know, SCAG policy directed staff to study E1 Toro and
Camp Pendleton further as potential sites for commercial air
operations. The two sites have been considered along with
number of others by the Airport Site Consensus Team. Since
E1 Toro did not rank as a finalist ~ite for study in round
III, SCAG needs to assess technical work on E1 Toro to
determine whether the SCAG Executive Committee policy
guidance for further study has been fulfilled. In that
regard, $CAG would appreciate the assistance of the
Inter-County Airport ~Authority in collecting E1 Toro
technical data completed to date'. The technical ~nformation
should be presented under separate cover and follow the
attached outline for the E1 Toro joint-use and civilian-use
alternatives.
upon completion, please forward one copy of the E1 Toro
material to Warren Ferrell at.._t_he SCAG offices and one copy
for review to A1 Beli at t'~e Planning Center.
Thank you
Authority.
Sincerely,
TIM MERWIN
Aviation Program Manager
Enclosure
for'the assistance of the Inter-County ~irport
CC:
Peter Drummond
ln~l~c,ial C,,,,r.,) c .k'anic Vogel..~,,p,~rv~.,.r . I os ~ngclc~ County o ~lmund Edelman..~t,pe't,'t~,r :,mi i',~rr ~ha~mm, 3(q,~t~,r. (.)r~mge Coun~, Gaddi VU.qlU,'*. ~'U~%'i~, ·
J~n ~anal. Mayor ~ T,',L C)l)re~n · Cdirs*of San ~,'nardi,,, C,.,umy o ~ Rhleha~ M, vor Mc, ntclair · Ch,c, ,,f Venlunl County o Frank MtI~ill. (¥,nclbtwttt~l. Oj.~ o
_
~EftT BY:NEWPOrT BSAOH -1~-~ ; 3'l~P~ ; LICENSE DIVI, ~1~ 23~ 1~2~/# ~
CIVILIAN USE OF USMAC~ EL TORO
ANALYSIS AND ISSUES
SCOPE OF WORK
The following Scope of Work will produce, a..r_eport p~ovlding a
convenient summary of the issues surrounding the subject. The
report will be based primarily on existing document) and resource~
but will be asgmented with some additional research and updated
graphics. Both Joint and exclusive u~e will b~ addressed
throughout·
.)
_T_ASK ~_~ ~_D__E.S.C__R~_~.E__TH_E .FACIL. ITY ~AND ENVIRONS
Provide graphics and statistics describing.
b ·
All on bas, activities and facilities including runways,
taxtways, fltght, operations, mission requirements,
m~intenance facilit~ie~, hou'stn!), p~r~onnel,-,tc.
Surrounding land use a
and planned Including
ways, transit faclliti
civilian use.
nO lnfra-si~ructure .both existing
housing, open-space are.as, road-
e~ and others inter-related to
TASK 2 - ANALYiZE AIRFI.E.L.,D__I_SSUES
Each of
the ai rf
and con
the following issues r~lated to the use or operation of
teld will be outlined and discussed (na more-or-less pro
~Ormat.
·
a, Runway utilization anU flight patterns of civilian aircraft.
b. Operational and airspace conflicts between military ond
civilian aircraft in a joint use situation.
c. Air Space capacity and air traffic conflicts.
d. Passenger capacity.
e. Live ordlnance danger~.
SENT BY:NEWPORT BEACH
236 1825 S C A G
~0n ~5×89
kICENSE DIVI~
2~3 2,38 ~2~;# 3
TASK 2 (continued)
t. Uavigastonal aids.
g.
Cost of alrsid~ improvements.
TASK 3 - A,NALYZE ~,,OUNDS,iID_,E' iSSUE~S
Each of the following issues related to passenger and cargo
handlln: will be outlined and discussed in a more-or-less pro and
con format.
a. Terminal location.
c, uargo f(~¢i es.
d. Mass transit availability.
e. Cost of groundside improvements.
'._TASK,,4 - AN_ALYZE E?VIRONME~TAL I, SSU,E$
Each of the following environmental impacts will be discussed by
providing both a "worst case"' unmitigated scenario and a "best
case" mtttgatQU scenario:
a. Aircraft noise.
b. Air quality.
6. Traffic.
T__ASK 5 ..- OUTL_!NE
IMPL, E,MENT, AT,I, ON ISS, UES
The institutional and reg
version of E1 Toro to a c
Primary among the issues
ula%ory ~nvlronment su'rrounding con-
ommercial airport will be outlined.
is gainin{..access from the Federal
Government which is steadfastl~ oiposeU. Additionally, potential
supportmr$ and opponents will e isted including governmental
jurisdictions and agencies, industry groups and citizen orgmni-
zatlons. Regulatory and zonin~ requirements will be discussed.
This ~ection will summarize the problems and potential ~or
assembling the necessary financial and institutional wherewithal
to accomplish civilian use of El'?oro.
· , !
,.
,
·
I1 : · i '
jATTAg
, .!
~.¥VONrK)J NOU. YJ.S ~ -- :. ~J
T
3
Z.
UNCONSTRAINED 52%
CONSTRAINED 1% <,
UNCONSTRAINED 38%
CONSTRAINED 0%
UNCONSTRAINED 2
'NSTRAINED
~ ~ Airport Boundary
~ Terminal Ar®m
0' 5000-- IO000,FEET
.MCAS El Toro (Joint Use)_"
Medium Haul Candidate Site
NOTE: Figure is conceptual
EL TORO PASSENGER CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS
Annual
Operations
Capacity
Joint Use
60,681
Exclusive
IFR Peak
Use
Practical ~~'~1
117,210
153,300
MAP @ 83
pax/op
5,037,000
9,728,000
12,724,000
MAP @ 93
pax/op
5,643,000
10,900,000
14,257,000
MAP @ 100
pax/op
6,068,000
11,721,000
15,330,000
MAP @ 110
pax/op
6,675,000
12,893,000
16,863,000
MAP @ 120
pax/op
7,282,000
14,065,000
18,396,000
COMMERCIAL JET AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS
JWA PHASE I
Z,. 5 MAP*
(EXISTING**)
JWA PHASE II
8.0 MAP*
( PROJECTED*** )
HOUR DEP- 'ARR '- DEP ARR
7 - 8 AM 12 3 19 5
8 - 9 AM 6 7 9 9
9 -10 AM 4 3 6 5
10 -11 AM 4 6 6 10
11 -12 AM 6 8 10 12
12 - 1 PM 5 3 8 5
1 - 2 PM 4 6 - 6 .......... 10
2 - 3 PM 7 3 11 5
.... 3- 4 PM 5 6 8 10
4 -'5 PM 6 6 10 10
5 - 6 PM 6 5 10 8
6 - 7 PM ' 6 4 10 6
7 - 8 PM 5 8 8 13
.
8 - 9 PM 5 8 8 13
9 -10 PM 6 8 10 13
10 -11 PM 0 3 0 5
Total 87 87 139 139
EL TORO
ALL CIVILIAN
(PROJECTED)
~EP ARR
28 8
15 15
10 8
10 16
15 18
12 8
10 16
15 8
12 16
15 16
15 12
15 9
12 20
12 20
14 20
0 0
210 210
Annual Ops 63,510'*** 101,470'*** "
153,300
* Excludes commuter passengers
** 10/13/89 '
·
·
*** 4 / 1'/90 "
**** JWA has an additional 300,000 GA operations
JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT
1988 AIRCRAFT LOAD FACTORS
A/C Type
MD-80
Average
Seat Capacity
Total
Operations
144 14,054
Percent of
Operations
24%
737-300
BAE-146
132 20,174
·
82 24,100
33%
4O%
B757
187 1,786
3%
~-~ B767.-200
201
B767-300
254
Total air carrier passengers 4,270,000 (excludes commuters)
Average 71 passengers per operation
Average load factor e~ual 54.4%
NOVEMBER 2, 1989
TO.'
FROM:
FOR:
SUBJECT:
PLANNING COMMISSION
MANAGER OF PLANNING SERVICES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 2, 1989
ACTIVITIES OF THE INTER-COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY RELATING
TO THE COMMERCIALIZATION OF MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
(MCAS) EL TORO
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Receive staff report.
2. Commission comments.
3. Authorize the chairperson to sign the letter to the City Council.
HISTORY:
At the Planning Commission meeting of October 5, 1989, members of the Commission
expressed concern about the efforts of the Inter-County Airport Authority (ICAA) to
study the technics/feasibility of the commercial use of Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS)
E1 Toro. The Commission was particularly concerned that the study is to be conducted
by ICAA Executive Director Ken Delino who is also Assistant to the City Manager for
the City of Newport Beach. The Commission requested that staff prepare a draft letter
to be sent to the City Council expressing its concerns.
ANALYSIS:
Staff has preparecl~a draft letter to be sent to the City Council (Attachment 1). The
letter expresses the Planning Commission's concerns that Mr. Ken Delino is an inappro-
priate choice to conduct the study due to the conflict of interest between his position
with the City of Newport Beach and as Executive Director of the Inter-County Airport
Authority. Mr. Delino's presentation to the California Commission on Aviation and
Airports in September 1988, in which he used outdated graphics, is cited as an example.
The letter recommends that the City Council closely monitor the efforts of the ICAA
and take the~ appropriate action to limit impacts on the City's strategy for the~
commercialization of MCAS E1 Toro.
CONCLUSION: '
Staff recommends that the planning Commission authorize the chairperson to sign the
letter to the City Council expressing its concerns.
Prepared by: Sammy Rake~ Assistant Planner (724-_6381)-
Revie_wed by: Steve Haubert, Principal Planner
Submitted b,y:
DA WATKINS
Manager of Planning Services
SR/DW:mjn
-- RECEI¥~2~3 _
N0V 0 lS89
COMMUNITY DEVLEOP~ENT
3IJ211-11/CDD(1)
NOVEMBER 2, 1989
TO:
CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
PLANNING COMMISSION
SUBJECT: ACTIVITIES OF THE INTER-COUNTY AIRPORT AIT~HORITY
RELATING TO THE COMMERCIALIZATION OF MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION (MCAS) EL TORO
Recently, the Planning CommiSsion was informed by staff that the
Southern 'California Association of Governments (SCAG) has
requested that the Inter-County Airport Authority (ICAA) collect
previously completed information on the feasibility of the
commercial use of MCAS E1 Toro. The work is to be done by ICAA
Executive Director Ken Delino. -I would like to'make you aware of
·
the Planning Commission's 'concerns about this study so that you
may take the appropriate action.
As-you are aware, Mr. Delino is employed as the Assistant to the
City Manager of the City of Newport Beach. As the City of
Newport Beach favors the commercial use of MCAS E1 Toro, this is
a clear conflict of interest with his position as' the Executive
· .
Director of an impartial organization such as the ICAA.
·
Mr. Delino's past actions have demonstrated bias favoring the
commercial use of MCAS E1 Toro. For example, in September 1988,
Mr. Delino made a presentation to the California Commission on
Aviation and Airports advocating the commercial use of the
facility. Furthermore, in making his presentation, Mr. Delino
used outdated maps and graphics to make the site- appear more
ATTACHMENT 1
NOV 0 I 1989
COMMUNITY DEVLEO~MENT
feasible. This bias could si~ilari~ {~luenc~ the information
collected and the results of the ICAA study in favor of the
commercial use of E1 Toro.
The City Council should be aware of the current activities of the
ICAA and Ken Delino. The Planning Commission recommends that
these, activities be'closely monitored and the appropriate action
taken to limit the potential negative impacts on ~he city of
Irvine's strategy for the commercialization of MCAS E1 Toro.
MARY ANN GAI DO,
Planning Commission Chairperson
MG/sr/MAG
cc: Planning Commission
04-00j